Safety Zone, Red River, MN, 17902-17905 [E9-8911]
Download as PDF
17902
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
establishes Class E2 airspace at
Binghamton, NY by expanding the
controlled airspace, extending upward
from the surface of the Earth to support
IFR operations at Binghamton Regional/
Edwin A. Link Field Airport to a 4.3mile radius with minor extensions for
arrivals.
Class D, Class E2 and E4 airspace
designations for airspace areas
extending upwards from the surface of
the Earth are published in Paragraph
5000, 6002 and 6004 respectively, of
FAA Order 7400.9S, dated October 3,
2008, and effective October 31, 2008,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class D and E2 airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the
Order.
Agency Findings
The regulations adopted herein will
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government. Therefore, it is determined
that this final rule does not have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore, (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
is within the scope of that authority as
it modifies the Class D, E2 and E4
airspace at Binghamton Regional/Edwin
A. Link Field Airport in Binghamton,
NY.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
■
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated October 3, 2008, and effective
October 31, 2008, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY D Binghamton, NY [REVISED]
Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link Field
Airport, Binghamton, NY
(Lat. 42°12′31″ N, long. 75°58′47″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 4,100 feet MSL
within a 4.3-mile radius of the Binghamton
Regional/Edwin A. Link Field Airport. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific days and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
days and times will thereafter be
continuously published in the Airport/
Facility Directory.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace
Designated as Surface Areas.
*
*
*
*
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace
Designated as an Extension to Class D
Surface Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA NY E4 Binghamton, NY [REVISED]
Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link Field
Airport, Binghamton, NY
(Lat. 42°12′31″ N, long. 75°58′47″ W)
Binghamton VORTAC
(Lat. 42°09′27″ N, long. 76°08′11″ W)
SMITE LOM
(Lat. 42°06′17″ N, long. 75°53′29″ W)
Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link Field
Airport ILS Runway 34 Localizer
(Lat. 42°13′12″ N, long. 75°59′15″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within 1.6 miles each side of the 070°
bearing from the airport to 9.3 miles
northeast of the airport and within 1.8 miles
each side of the Binghamton VORTAC 067°
bearing from the VORTAC to the 4.3-mile
radius to the airport and within 1.8 miles
each side of the Binghamton Regional/Edwin
A. Link Field Airport ILS LOC SE course
extending from the 4.3-mile radius of the
airport to 1.8 miles SE of the SMITE LOM.
This Class E Surface airspace area is effective
during the specific days and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective days and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April 2,
2009.
Myron A. Jenkins,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. E9–8835 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
*
AEA NY E2 Binghamton, NY [NEW]
Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link Field
Airport, Binghamton, NY
(Lat. 42°12′31″ N, long. 75°58′47″ W)
Binghamton VORTAC
(Lat. 42°09′27″ N, long. 76°08′11″ W)
SMITE LOM
(Lat. 42°06′17″ N, long. 75°53′29″ W)
ILS Runway 34 Localizer
(Lat. 42°13′12″ N, long. 75°59′15″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface of the Earth within a 4.3-mile radius
of the Binghamton Regional/Edwin A. Link
Field Airport and within 1.6 miles each side
PO 00000
of the 070° bearing from the airport to 9.3
miles northeast of the airport and within 1.8
miles each side of the Binghamton VORTAC
067° bearing from the VORTAC to the 4.3mile radius to the airport and within 1.8
miles each side of the Binghamton Regional/
Edwin A. Link Field Airport ILS LOC SE
course extending from the 4.3-mile radius of
the airport to 1.8 miles SE of the SMITE
LOM. This Class E Surface airspace area is
effective during the specific days and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective days and times will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0240]
RIN 1625–AAOO
Safety Zone, Red River, MN
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
Coast Guard, DHS.
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
ACTION:
Temporary final rule.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard Captain of
the Port, Marine Safety Unit Duluth, MN
is establishing a temporary safety zone
on the Red River, MN. This safety zone
is being established to ensure, to the
extent practicable, the safety of the
public. The safety zone prohibits
individuals from entering all navigable
waters of the Red River, in the State of
Minnesota, north of a line drawn across
latitude 46°20′00″ N, including those
portions of the river in Wilkin, Clay,
Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson
counties, extending to the United StatesCanada international border.
DATES: This rule is effective from 12
p.m. on March 31, 2009 until 5 p.m. on
April 24, 2009. If the river conditions
change such that enforcement of the
Safety Zone is unnecessary prior to 5
p.m. on April 24, 2009, the COTP will
notify the public via a Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0240 and are available online at
https://www.regulations.gov. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and the Coast
Guard Marine Safety Unit Duluth, MN,
600 S. Lake Avenue, Duluth, MN, 55802
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call LT Aaron Gross, Chief of Port
Operations, Marine Safety Unit Duluth,
600 S. Lake Avenue, Duluth, MN 55802;
(218) 720–5286 Ext. 111. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be contrary to the emergency
nature for which this safety zone is
being established. Specifically,
inclement weather has caused the Red
River to flood, and in an effort to protect
the public, to the extent practicable,
from the dangers of the flood it is
necessary to publish this temporary rule
without notice and comment.
For that same reason, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure, to the extent
practicable, the safety of the public from
hazards involved with the flooding of
the Red River. Restricted access to the
Red River by the public will help
protect persons and property from the
dangers associated with the flooding
along the Red River.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure, to the extent practicable, the
safety of and property from the hazards
presented from the flooding of the Red
River. The safety zone will be in effect
from March 31, 2009 until 5 p.m. on
April 24, 2009.
The safety zone will encompass all
navigable waters of the Red River in the
State of Minnesota north of a line drawn
across latitude 46°20′00″ N, including
those portions of the river in Wilkin,
Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and
Kittson counties, extending to the
United States-Canada international
border.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated onscene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17903
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will be
in effect only until the Red River is
deemed safe to transit. Further, vessel
operators desiring to enter or operate
within the safety zone may contact the
Captain of the Port Duluth or his onscene representative to seek permission
to do so.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
17904
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
3306, 3703 and Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T09–0240 to
read as follows:
■
Technical Standards
§ 165.T09–0240 Safety zone; Red River
Safety Zone, Red River, MN.
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: all navigable
waters of the Red River in the State of
Minnesota north of a line drawn across
latitude 46°20′00″ N, including those
portions of the river in Wilkin, Clay,
Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson
counties, to the United States—Canada
international border.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced from 12 p.m. on March 31,
2009 until 5 p.m. on April 24, 2009. If
the River conditions change such that
enforcement of the Safety Zone is
unnecessary prior to 5 p.m. on April 24,
2009, the COTP will notify the public
via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Duluth, or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Duluth or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Duluth
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded under the Instruction
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. This temporary rule
establishes a safety zone therefore
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction
applies.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
of the Port Duluth or his on-scene
representative.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 31, 2009.
M.P. Lebsack,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Duluth.
[FR Doc. E9–8911 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0217]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Jordan Bridge
Demolition, Elizabeth River,
Chesapeake and Portsmouth, VA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
rmajette on PRODPC74 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Elizabeth River in the vicinity of
Chesapeake and Portsmouth, VA during
demolition of the Jordan Bridge. This
action is intended to protect mariners
and public property on the Elizabeth
River from the hazards associated with
bridge demolition.
DATES: This rule is effective from May
3, 2009 through May 6, 2009, with
contingency dates of May 18, 2009
through May 21, 2009 in the event of
adverse weather conditions.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0217 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2009–0217 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail LT Tiffany Duffy,
Coast Guard; telephone 757–668–5580,
e-mail Tiffany.A.Duffy@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:41 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because any
delay encountered in this regulation’s
effective date by publishing a NPRM
would be contrary to public interest
since immediate action is needed to
provide for the safety of life and
property on navigable waters.
Specifically, since debris from a bridge
being demolished could lead to severe
injury, fatalities and/or destruction of
public property, immediate action is
needed to protect, to the extent
practicable, the public’s safety.
For the same reason, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads
has been notified by Delta Demolition
Group that construction operations to
demolish the Jordan Bridge lift span
over the Elizabeth River will commence
on May 3, 2009. Due to the need to
protect mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with this project,
access to the Elizabeth River between
the Belt Line Railroad Bridge and the
Norfolk and Western Portsmouth
Chesapeake Railroad Bridge will be
temporarily restricted.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone on specified
waters of the Elizabeth River in the
vicinity of Chesapeake and Portsmouth,
VA. This safety zone will encompass all
navigable waters of the Elizabeth River
between the Belt Line Railroad Bridge at
approximate position 36°48′42″ N/
76°17′25″ W (NAD 1983) and the
Norfolk and Western Portsmouth
Chesapeake Railroad Bridge at
approximate position 36°47′49″ N/
76°17′34″ W (NAD 1983). This regulated
area will be established in the interest
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17905
of public safety during the removal of
the Jordan Bridge lift span and will be
enforced from May 3, 2009 through May
6, 2009, with contingency dates of May
18, 2009 through May 21, 2009 in the
event of adverse weather conditions.
Access to the area within the safety zone
will be restricted during the specified
date and times or until swing span
removal is complete, whichever is
sooner. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Representative, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. Although this proposed
regulation restricts access to the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because: (i) The safety zone
will be in effect for a limited duration;
(ii) the zone is of limited size; and (iii)
the Coast Guard will make notifications
via maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly. For the
above reasons, the Coast Guard does not
anticipate any significant economic
impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit a portion of
the Elizabeth River during the time this
regulation is in effect. Since the impact
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17902-17905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8911]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0240]
RIN 1625-AAOO
Safety Zone, Red River, MN
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
[[Page 17903]]
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Unit
Duluth, MN is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Red River,
MN. This safety zone is being established to ensure, to the extent
practicable, the safety of the public. The safety zone prohibits
individuals from entering all navigable waters of the Red River, in the
State of Minnesota, north of a line drawn across latitude
46[deg]20'00'' N, including those portions of the river in Wilkin,
Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson counties, extending to the
United States-Canada international border.
DATES: This rule is effective from 12 p.m. on March 31, 2009 until 5
p.m. on April 24, 2009. If the river conditions change such that
enforcement of the Safety Zone is unnecessary prior to 5 p.m. on April
24, 2009, the COTP will notify the public via a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0240 and are available online
at https://www.regulations.gov. They are also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and
the Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Duluth, MN, 600 S. Lake Avenue,
Duluth, MN, 55802 between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call LT Aaron Gross, Chief of Port Operations, Marine
Safety Unit Duluth, 600 S. Lake Avenue, Duluth, MN 55802; (218) 720-
5286 Ext. 111. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be contrary to the
emergency nature for which this safety zone is being established.
Specifically, inclement weather has caused the Red River to flood, and
in an effort to protect the public, to the extent practicable, from the
dangers of the flood it is necessary to publish this temporary rule
without notice and comment.
For that same reason, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure, to the extent
practicable, the safety of the public from hazards involved with the
flooding of the Red River. Restricted access to the Red River by the
public will help protect persons and property from the dangers
associated with the flooding along the Red River.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure, to the extent
practicable, the safety of and property from the hazards presented from
the flooding of the Red River. The safety zone will be in effect from
March 31, 2009 until 5 p.m. on April 24, 2009.
The safety zone will encompass all navigable waters of the Red
River in the State of Minnesota north of a line drawn across latitude
46[deg]20'00'' N, including those portions of the river in Wilkin,
Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson counties, extending to the
United States-Canada international border.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth
or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be in effect only until the Red River is deemed safe to
transit. Further, vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within
the safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-
scene representative to seek permission to do so.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
[[Page 17904]]
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This temporary rule establishes a safety
zone therefore paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction applies.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703 and
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T09-0240 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0240 Safety zone; Red River Safety Zone, Red River, MN.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all
navigable waters of the Red River in the State of Minnesota north of a
line drawn across latitude 46[deg]20'00'' N, including those portions
of the river in Wilkin, Clay, Norman, Polk, Marshall and Kittson
counties, to the United States--Canada international border.
(b) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced from 12 p.m. on
March 31, 2009 until 5 p.m. on April 24, 2009. If the River conditions
change such that enforcement of the Safety Zone is unnecessary prior to
5 p.m. on April 24, 2009, the COTP will notify the public via a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Duluth, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
[[Page 17905]]
of the Port Duluth or his on-scene representative.
Dated: March 31, 2009.
M.P. Lebsack,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Duluth.
[FR Doc. E9-8911 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P