Virginia Regulatory Program, 17806-17810 [E9-8883]
Download as PDF
17806
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Act
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal
that is the subject of this rule is based
on counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State or
local governmental agencies or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the state submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based on the
analysis performed under various laws
and executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: February 24, 2009.
Thomas D. Shope,
Appalachian Regional Director.
[FR Doc. E9–8885 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:03 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
30 CFR Part 946
[VA–126–FOR; Docket ID OSM–2008–0012]
Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
public comment period.
SUMMARY: We are reopening the public
comment period on a proposed
amendment to the Virginia regulatory
program under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). Since the close of
the comment period, Virginia revised its
regulations pertaining to Valid Existing
Rights (VER) and made other minor
wording and organizational changes.
Virginia intends to revise its program to
be consistent with the corresponding
Federal regulations and SMCRA and is
responding, in part, to 30 CFR Part 732
letters.
DATES: We will accept written
comments until 4 p.m., local time, May
4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by ‘‘VA–126–FOR/OSM–
2008–0012’’ by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: ebandy@osmre.gov.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Earl Bandy,
Knoxville Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
710 Locust Street, 2nd Floor, Knoxville,
Tennessee 37902, Telephone: (865) 545–
4103.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The proposed rule
has been assigned Docket ID OSM–
2008–0012. If you would like to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and do the
following. Click on the ‘‘Advanced
Docket Search’’ button on the right side
of the screen. Type in the Docket ID
OSM–2008–0012 and click the
‘‘Submit’’ button at the bottom of the
page. The next screen will display the
Docket Search Results for the
rulemaking. If you click on OSM–2008–
0012, you can view the proposed rule
and submit a comment. You can also
view supporting material and any
comments submitted by others.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
‘‘OSM–2008–0012/VA–126–FOR’’ for
this rulemaking. For detailed
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ section in this
document. You may also request to
speak at a public hearing by any of the
methods listed above or by contacting
the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
Virginia program, this submission, a
listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in
response to this document at OSM’s
Knoxville Field Office at the address
listed above during normal business
hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the submission by
contacting OSM’s Knoxville Field
Office. In addition, you may receive a
copy of the submission during regular
business hours at the following location:
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals,
and Energy, 3405 Mountain Empire
Road, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219,
Telephone: Legal Services Officer (276)
523–8157.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Earl
Bandy, Telephone: (865) 545–4103. email: ebandy@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Description of the Submission
III. Public Comment Procedures
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act * * * and
rules and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Virginia
program on December 15, 1981. You can
find background information on the
Virginia program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
of the Virginia program in the December
15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR
61088). You can also find later actions
concerning Virginia’s program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 946.12,
946.13, and 946.15.
E:\FR\FM\17APP1.SGM
17APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
II. Description of the Submission
By letter dated June 11, 2008, the
Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals,
and Energy (DMME) sent us an informal
proposed amendment to its program for
a pre-submission review (VA–126–INF).
We reviewed the pre-submission and
responded to the DMME, with
comments, via electronic mail on July 2,
2008. By letter dated July 17, 2008, the
DMME formally submitted the proposed
amendments to its program
(Administrative Record No. VA–1089).
We announced receipt of the
amendment in the August 29, 2008,
Federal Register (73 FR 50915).
OSM’s review of the July 17, 2008,
submittal identified several issues that
we presented to the DMME. The first
discussion occurred by telephone on
September 4, 2008. As a result of that
discussion the DMME submitted on the
same date via electronic mail
Memorandum #13–86 which specifies
application processing time limits for
new permits and revision applications
(Administrative Record No. VA–1093).
The complete text of the Memorandum
can be found at https://
www.dmme.virginia.gov/DMLR/docs/
operatormemos. A subsequent meeting
was held on October 16, 2008
(Administrative Record No. VA–1099).
In an electronic mail message dated
October 29, 2008 (Administrative
Record No. VA–2000), the DMME
provided its position in response to
OSM’s comments and agreed to
expeditiously submit additional
changes. On November 3, 2008, the
DMME responded by submitting
regulation changes via electronic mail
(Administrative Record No. VA–2001).
OSM provided additional comments on
the regulation changes on November 13,
2008 (Administrative Record No. VA–
2002), and the DMME responded to
these comments on November 20, 2008,
by electronic mail (Administrative
Record No. VA–2003). The DMME
proposes the following changes:
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
1. 4VAC25–130–700.5
Definitions.
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 761.5. The
DMME proposes to modify the
definition of Valid Existing Rights
(VER). As proposed, the definition will
read as follows (revised text in italics):
‘‘Valid existing rights’’ means a set of
circumstances under which a person
may, subject to Division approval,
conduct surface coal mining operations
on lands where Section 45.1–252 D of
the Act and Section 4VAC25–130–
761.11 of the regulations would
otherwise prohibit such operations. The
possession of valid existing rights only
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:03 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
confers an exception from the
prohibitions of Sections 45.1–252 D and
4VAC25–130–761.11. A person seeking
to exercise valid existing rights must
comply with all pertinent requirements
of the Act and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, and would
need:
(a) Except as provided in subsection
(c) of this definition, a demonstration of
the legally binding conveyance, lease,
deed, contract, or other document
which vests the person, or predecessor
in interest, with the right to conduct the
type of surface coal mining operations
intended. The right must exist at the
time the land came under the protection
of Sections 4VAC25–130–761.11 and
45.1–252 D.
2. 4VAC25–130–761.11 Areas where
mining is prohibited or limited;
4VAC25–130–761.12 Exception for
existing operations; 4VAC25–130–
761.16 Submission and processing of
requests for valid existing rights
determinations; 4VAC25–130–772.12
Permit requirements for exploration
removing more than 250 tons of coal.
The corresponding Federal
regulations for the following sections
are 30 CFR 761.11, 761.12, 761.16, and
772.12. The DMME proposes to add new
sections 4VAC25–130–761.12, and
4VAC25–130–761.16 and revise
4VAC25–130–761.11 and 4VAC25–130–
772.12 to read as follows:
(a) 4VAC25–130–761.11. Areas where
mining is prohibited or limited.
(Revised) Delete Paragraph (h) which
reads as follows: There will be no
surface coal mining, permitting,
licensing, or exploration of Federal
Lands in the National Park System,
National Wildlife Refuge System,
National System of Trails, National
Wilderness Preservation System, Wild
and Scenic Rivers System, or National
Recreation Areas, unless called for by
Acts of Congress.
(b) 4VAC25–130–761.12 Exception for
existing operations. (New) The
prohibitions and limitations of
4VAC25–130–761.11 do not apply to
surface coal mining operations for
which a valid permit, issued under
Subchapter VG of this chapter, exists
when the land comes under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11. This
exception applies only to lands within
the permit area as it exists when the
land comes under the protection of
4VAC25–130–761.11.
(c) 4VAC25–130–761.16 Submission
and processing of requests for valid
existing rights determinations. (New)
(a) Basic framework for valid existing
rights determinations. The table of 30
CFR 761.16(a) identifies the agency
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17807
responsible for making a valid existing
rights determination and the definition
that it must use, based upon which
subsection of 30 CFR 761.11 or
4VAC25–130–761.11 applies and
whether the request includes federal
lands.
(b) A request for a valid existing rights
determination must be submitted to the
Division, if a person intends to conduct
surface coal mining operations on the
basis of valid existing rights under
4VAC25–130–761.11 or wishes to
confirm the right to do so. The request
may be submitted before the person
prepares and submits an application for
a permit or boundary revision for the
land.
(1) The person must provide a
property rights demonstration under the
definition of valid existing rights if the
request relies upon the ‘‘good faith/all
permits’’ or the ‘‘needed for and
adjacent’’ standard set forth in the valid
existing rights definition in 4VAC25–
130–700.5. For the land subject to the
request, the demonstration must
include:
(i) A legal description of the land.
(ii) Complete documentation of the
character and extent of the person’s
current interests in the surface and
mineral estates of the land.
(iii) A complete chain of title for the
surface and mineral estates of the land.
(iv) A description of the nature and
effect of each title instrument that forms
the basis for the request, including any
provision pertaining to the type or
method of mining or mining-related
surface disturbances and facilities.
(v) A description of the type and
extent of surface coal mining operations
that the person claims the right to
conduct, including the method of
mining, any mining-related surface
activities and facilities, and an
explanation of how those operations
would be consistent with Virginia
property law.
(vi) Complete documentation of the
nature and ownership, as of the date
that the land came under the protection
of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or Section 45.1–
252, of all property rights for the surface
and mineral estates.
(vii) Names and addresses of the
current owners of the surface and
mineral estates of the land.
(viii) If the coal interests have been
severed from other property interests,
documentation that the person has
notified and provided reasonable
opportunity for the owners of other
property interests in the land to
comment on the validity of the person’s
property rights claims.
E:\FR\FM\17APP1.SGM
17APP1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
17808
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(ix) Any comments that the person
receives in response to the notification
provided under subdivision (b)(1)(viii).
(2) If the request relies upon the good
faith/all permits standard in subdivision
(b)(1) of the valid existing rights
definition in 4VAC25–130–700.5, in
addition to the information provided by
subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the
person must also submit the information
about permits, licenses, and
authorizations for surface coal mining
operations on the land subject to the
request that the person or predecessor in
interest obtained, submitted, or made:
(i) Approval and issuance dates and
identification numbers for any permits,
licenses, and authorizations obtained
before the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252.
(ii) Application dates and
identification numbers for any permits,
licenses, and authorizations submitted
before the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252.
(iii) An explanation of any other good
faith effort made to obtain the necessary
permits, licenses, and authorizations as
of the date that the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252.
(3) If the request relies upon the
needed for and adjacent standard in
subdivision (b)(2) of the valid existing
rights definition in 4VAC25–130–700.5,
in addition to the information provided
by subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the
person must explain how and why the
land is needed for and immediately
adjacent to the operation upon which
the request is based, including a
demonstration that prohibiting
expansion of the operation onto that
land would unfairly impact the viability
of the operation as originally planned
before the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252.
(4) If the request relies upon one of
the standards for roads in subdivisions
(c)(1–3) of the valid existing rights
definition in 4VAC25–130–700.5, the
person must submit satisfactory
documentation that:
(i) The road existed when the land
upon which it is located came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252, and the person has a
legal right to use the road for surface
coal mining operations;
(ii) A properly recorded right of way
or easement for a road in that location
existed when the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252, and, under the
document creating the right of way or
easement, and under any subsequent
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:03 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
conveyances, the person has a legal
right to use or construct a road across
that right of way or easement to conduct
surface coal mining operations; or
(iii) A valid permit for use or
construction of a road in that location
for surface coal mining operations
existed when the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11 or
Section 45.1–252.
(c) Initial review of request. The
Division must conduct an initial review
to determine whether the request
includes all applicable components of
the submission requirements of
subsection (b). The review pertains only
to the completeness of the request, not
the legal or technical adequacy of the
materials submitted.
(2) If the request does not include all
applicable components of the
submission requirements of subsection
(b), the Division must notify the person
and establish a reasonable time for
submission of the missing information.
Should the person not provide the
information requested by the Division
under this subdivision, within the time
specified or as subsequently extended,
the Division must issue a determination
under subdivision (e)(4) that the person
has not demonstrated valid existing
rights.
(3) When the request includes all
applicable components of the
submission requirements of subsection
(b), the Division must implement the
notice and comment requirements of
subsection (d).
(d)(1) When the division determines
that the request satisfies the
completeness requirements of
subsection (c), it shall publish a notice
in a newspaper of general circulation in
the county in which the land is located
inviting public comment on the merits
of the request. OSMRE will publish a
similar notice in the Federal Register if
the request involves Federal lands
within an area listed in 4VAC25–130–
761.11(a) or (b). The public notice must
include:
(i) The location of the land to which
the request pertains.
(ii) A description of the type of
surface coal mining operations planned.
(iii) A reference to and brief
description of the applicable standard(s)
under the definition of valid existing
rights in 4VAC25–130–700.5.
(A) If the request relies upon the
‘‘good faith/all permits’’ or the ‘‘needed
for and adjacent’’ standard set forth in
the valid existing rights definition in
4VAC25–130–700.5, the notice must
include a description of the property
rights that the person claims and the
basis for the claim.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(B) If the request relies upon the road
standard set forth in subdivision (c)(1)
of the valid existing rights definition in
4VAC25–130–700.5, the notice must
include a description of the basis for the
claim that the road existed when the
land came under the protection of
4VAC25–130–761.11 or Section 45.1–
252. In addition, the notice must
include a description of the basis for the
claim that the person has a legal right
to use that road for surface coal mining
operations.
(C) If the request relies upon the
standard in subdivision (c)(2) of the
valid existing rights definition in
4VAC25–130–700.5, the notice must
include a description of the basis for the
claim that a properly recorded right of
way or easement for a road in that
location existed when the land came
under the protection of 4VAC25–130–
761.11 or Section 45.1–252. In addition,
the notice must include a description of
the basis for the claim that, under the
document creating the right of way or
easement, and under any subsequent
conveyances, the person has a legal
right to use or construct a road across
the right of way or easement to conduct
surface coal mining operations.
(iv) If the request relies upon one or
more of the standards in subdivisions
(b) and (c)(1and 2) and (c)(2) of the valid
existing rights definition in 4VAC25–
130–700.5, a statement that the Division
will not make a decision on the merits
of the request if, by the close of the
comment period under the notice or the
notice required by subdivision (d)(3), a
person with a legal interest in the land
initiates appropriate legal action in the
proper venue to resolve any differences
concerning the validity or interpretation
of the deed, lease, easement, or other
documents that form the basis of the
valid existing rights claim.
(v) A description of the procedures
the division will follow in processing
the request.
(vi) The closing date of the public
comment period, which shall be a
minimum of 30 days after the notice’s
publication date.
(vii) A statement that interested
persons may request, in writing, from
the Division a 30 day extension of the
public comment period. The extension
request shall set forth with reasonable
specificity, the reasons the commenter
needs the additional time to submit
comments.
(viii) Include the Division office’s
address where a copy of the valid
existing rights request is available for
public inspection and to where
comments and requests for extension of
the comment period should be sent.
E:\FR\FM\17APP1.SGM
17APP1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(2) The Division must promptly
provide a copy of the notice required
under subdivision (d)(1) to:
(i) All reasonably locatable owners of
surface and mineral estates in the land
included in the valid existing rights
request.
(ii) The owner of the feature causing
the land to come under the protection
of 4VAC25–130–761.11, and, when
applicable, the agency(ies) with primary
jurisdiction over the feature with
respect to the values causing the land to
come under the protection of 4VAC25–
130–761.11.
(3) The notice required under
subdivision (d)(2) must provide a 30 day
comment period, and specify that
another 30 days may be granted for good
cause shown at the discretion of the
Division or agency responsible for the
valid existing rights determination.
(e)(1) The division or agency
responsible for making the valid
existing rights determination must
review the materials submitted under
subsection (b), comments received
under subsection (d), and any other
relevant, reasonably available
information to determine whether the
record is sufficiently complete and
adequate to support a decision on the
merits of the request. If not, the division
must notify the person in writing,
explaining the inadequacy of the record
and requesting submittal, within a
specified reasonable time, of any
additional information that the division
deems necessary to remedy the
inadequacy.
(2) Once the record is complete and
adequate, the Division must determine
whether you have demonstrated valid
existing rights. The Division’s decision
must explain how the person has or has
not satisfied all applicable elements of
the valid existing rights definition under
4VAC25–130–700.5, contain findings of
fact and conclusions, and specify the
reasons for the conclusions.
(3) When the request relies upon one
or more of the standards in subdivisions
(b) and (c)(1 and 2) of the valid existing
rights definition in 4VAC25–130–700.5,
the Division:
(i) Must issue a determination that the
person has not demonstrated valid
existing rights if the property rights
claim is the subject of pending litigation
in a court or administrative body with
jurisdiction over the property rights in
question. The division will make the
determination without prejudice,
meaning that the person may refile the
request once the property rights dispute
is finally adjudicated. This applies only
to situations in which legal action has
been initiated as of the closing date of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:03 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
the comment period under subdivisions
(d)(1) or (d)(3).
(ii) If the record indicates
disagreement as to the accuracy of the
person’s property rights claim, but the
disagreement is not the subject of
pending litigation in a court or
administrative agency of competent
jurisdiction, must evaluate the merits of
the information in the record and
determine whether the person has
demonstrated that the requisite property
rights exist under subdivision (a), (c)(1),
or (c)(2) of the valid existing rights
definition in 4VAC25–130–700.5, as
appropriate. The Division must then
proceed with the decision process under
subdivision (e)(2) of this section.
(4) The Division must issue a
determination that the person has not
demonstrated valid existing rights if the
person does not submit information that
the division requests under subdivision
(c)(2) or (e)(1) of this section within the
time specified or as subsequently
extended. The Division will make the
determination without prejudice,
meaning the person may refile a revised
request at any time.
(5) After making a valid existing rights
determination, the Division shall:
(i) Provide the person a copy of the
determination with an explanation of
appeal rights and procedures to the
person seeking the determination,
owner or owners of the land to which
the determination applies, owner of the
feature causing the land to come under
the protection of 4VAC25–130–761.11,
and, when applicable, the agency with
primary jurisdiction over the feature
with respect to the values that caused
the land to come under the protection
of 4VAC25–130–761.11.
(ii) Publish notice of the
determination in a newspaper of general
circulation in the county in which the
land is located. OSMRE will publish the
determination, together with an
explanation of appeal rights and
procedures, in the Federal Register if
the request includes Federal lands
within an area listed in 4VAC25–130–
761.11(a) or (b).
(f) The division’s valid existing rights
determination shall be subject to
administrative and judicial review
under 4VAC25–130–775.11 and
4VAC25–130–775.13.
(g) The division must make a copy of
the valid existing rights determination
request available to the public as
provided by 4VAC25–130–773.13(d),
and the records associated with that
request, and any subsequent
determination under subsection (e) of
this section, available to the public in
accordance with 4VAC25–130–840.14.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17809
(d) 4VAC25–130–772.12. Permit
requirements for exploration removing
more than 250 tons of coal, or occurring
on lands designated as unsuitable for
surface coal mining operations.
(Revised by adding paragraphs (b)(14)
and (d)(2)(iv))
(b) Application Information. Each
application for an exploration permit
shall contain, at a minimum, the
following information:
(14) For any lands listed in 4VAC25–
130–761.11, a demonstration that, to the
extent technologically and economically
feasible, the proposed exploration
activities have been designed to
minimize interference with the values
for which those lands were designated
as unsuitable for surface coal mining
operations. The application must
include documentation of consultation
with the owner of the feature causing
the land to come under the protection
of 4VAC25–130–761.11, and, when
applicable, with the agency with
primary jurisdiction over the feature
with respect to the values that caused
the land to come under the protection
of 4VAC25–130–761.11.
(d) Decisions on applications for
exploration.
(2) The Division shall approve a
complete and accurate application for a
coal exploration permit filed in
accordance with this Part if it finds, in
writing, that the applicant has
demonstrated that the exploration and
reclamation described in the application
will:
(iv) With respect to exploration
activities on any lands protected under
4VAC25–130–761.11, minimize
interference, to the extent
technologically and economically
feasible, with the values for which those
lands were designated as unsuitable for
surface coal mining operations. Before
making this finding, the division must
provide reasonable opportunity to the
owner of the feature causing the land to
come under the protection of 4VAC25–
130–761.11, and, when applicable, to
the agency with primary jurisdiction
over the feature with respect to the
values that caused the land to come
under the protection of 4VAC25–130–
761.11, to comment on whether the
finding is appropriate.
3. 4VAC25–130–773.21 Improvidently
issued permits; rescission procedures.
The corresponding Federal regulation
is 30 CFR 773.23(c)(2). At subsection
(b), the DMME proposes to require that
the division shall post notice of a permit
suspension or rescission at its offices
and on its internet home page. At
subsection (e), the DMME proposes to
require that if a permittee files an appeal
E:\FR\FM\17APP1.SGM
17APP1
17810
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
for administrative review of the notice
or decision under subsection (c) under
§ 4VAC25–130–775.11 and § 2.2–4000 et
seq of the Code of Virginia, the notice
of the public hearing scheduled under
this subsection will be posted at the
division office located nearest to the
permit.
4. 4VAC25–130–773.13 Public
participation in permit processing.
The corresponding Federal regulation
is 30 CFR 773.6. The DMME proposes
to change ‘‘paragraph’’ to ‘‘subsection’’
in section (b)(1).
5. 4VAC25–130–774.12
issuance requirements.
Post-permit
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 774.11. The
DMME proposes to change ‘‘paragraph’’
to ‘‘subsection’’ in section (e).
III. Public Comment Procedures
6. 4VAC25–130–774.17 Transfer,
assignment, or sale of permit rights.
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 774.17. The
DMME proposes to change ‘‘paragraph’’
to ‘‘subsection’’ in section (a).
7. 4VAC130–778.13
interests.
Identification of
The corresponding Federal regulation
for this section is 30 CFR 778.11. The
DMME proposes to change
‘‘paragraph(s)’’ to ‘‘subsection(s)’’ in
sections (c), (d), (k), and (m).
8. 4VAC25–130–801.13
Self-bonding.
There is no direct Federal counterpart
regulation for this section. The DMME
proposes to change ‘‘paragraph’’ to
‘‘subdivision’’ in sections (a)(3), (a)(7),
and (b).
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
9. 4VAC25–130–840.14
records.
Aailability of
The corresponding Federal regulation
is 30 CFR 840.14(c). The DMME
proposes to post a notice that states in
part: Pursuant to § 2.1–340 et seq. of the
Code of Virginia, as amended, and §§ 4
VAC 25–130–700.14, 4 VAC 25–130–
702.13, 4 VAC 25–130–772.15, 4 VAC
25–130–773.13(d), and 4 VAC 25–130–
840.14 (b) of the Virginia Coal Surface
Mining Reclamation Regulations, the
Division of Mined Land Reclamation
(DMLR) will make available copies of all
records, reports, inspection materials,
permit applications, or information
obtained by the Division for public
inspection and copying. The Division
will maintain the information at its
principal office located in Big Stone
Gap, Virginia. The information will also
be made available upon request at the
Division’s Lebanon office. The DMLR
may, upon request, provide the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:03 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
information at other Federal, State, or
local government office(s) located in the
county where the mining is or may be
proposed to occur, or provide the
information electronically to the
requestor. If a person wishes to inspect
the information, he or she may visit or
call one of DMLR’s offices, or send an
electronic request. Information
regarding laws, regulations, public
participation, complaints, guidance
documents, procedures to request
information, and other topics may be
obtained from the DMLR’s office or
accessed through the DMLR’s internet
site. This notice will be sent to Circuit
Court Clerks of coal-producing counties
(Lee, Wise, Scott, Dickenson, Russell,
Tazewell, Buchanan); posted at DMLR
offices; and placed on the DMME
webpage.
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Virginia program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they
should be specific, confined to issues
pertinent to the proposed regulations,
and explain the reason for any
recommended change(s). We appreciate
any and all comments, but those most
useful and likely to influence decisions
on the final regulations will be those
that either involve personal experience
or include citations to and analyses of
SMCRA, its legislative history, its
implementing regulations, case law,
other pertinent Tribal or Federal laws or
regulations, technical literature, or other
relevant publications. We cannot ensure
that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) or
sent to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be
included in the docket for this
rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: January 22, 2009.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director.
Editorial Note: This document was
received in the Office of the Federal Register
on Tuesday, April 14, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9–8883 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0181; FRL–8892–9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Georgia;
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance
Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Georgia
Department of Natural Resources
through the Georgia Environmental
Protection Division on February 13,
2009. The revisions include minor
changes to Georgia’s Air Quality Rules
found at Chapter 391–3–20–.17,
pertaining to rules for Enhanced
Inspection and Maintenance.
Specifically, the changes update the
amount of repair costs that may qualify
for a waiver. This action is being taken
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act.
In the Final Rules Section of this
Federal Register, EPA is approving the
State’s SIP revision as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. A detailed rationale for the
approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this final rule,
no further activity is contemplated. If
EPA receives adverse comments, the
direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on this proposed rule. EPA will
not institute a second comment period
of this proposal. Any parties interested
in commenting on this proposal should
do so at this time.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before May 18, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\17APP1.SGM
17APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 73 (Friday, April 17, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17806-17810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8883]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA-126-FOR; Docket ID OSM-2008-0012]
Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are reopening the public comment period on a proposed
amendment to the Virginia regulatory program under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Since the close
of the comment period, Virginia revised its regulations pertaining to
Valid Existing Rights (VER) and made other minor wording and
organizational changes. Virginia intends to revise its program to be
consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations and SMCRA and is
responding, in part, to 30 CFR Part 732 letters.
DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., local time, May 4,
2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by ``VA-126-FOR/OSM-
2008-0012'' by any of the following methods:
E-mail: ebandy@osmre.gov.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Earl Bandy, Knoxville Field Office,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 710 Locust
Street, 2nd Floor, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, Telephone: (865) 545-
4103.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
The proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID OSM-2008-0012. If you
would like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal,
go to https://www.regulations.gov and do the following. Click on the
``Advanced Docket Search'' button on the right side of the screen. Type
in the Docket ID OSM-2008-0012 and click the ``Submit'' button at the
bottom of the page. The next screen will display the Docket Search
Results for the rulemaking. If you click on OSM-2008-0012, you can view
the proposed rule and submit a comment. You can also view supporting
material and any comments submitted by others.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
docket number ``OSM-2008-0012/VA-126-FOR'' for this rulemaking. For
detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures''
section in this document. You may also request to speak at a public
hearing by any of the methods listed above or by contacting the
individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the Virginia program, this
submission, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this document at OSM's Knoxville Field
Office at the address listed above during normal business hours, Monday
through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of
the submission by contacting OSM's Knoxville Field Office. In addition,
you may receive a copy of the submission during regular business hours
at the following location: Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals, and
Energy, 3405 Mountain Empire Road, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219,
Telephone: Legal Services Officer (276) 523-8157.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Earl Bandy, Telephone: (865) 545-4103.
e-mail: ebandy@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Description of the Submission
III. Public Comment Procedures
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of this Act * * * and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Virginia program on December 15, 1981. You can find background
information on the Virginia program, including the Secretary's
findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of
the Virginia program in the December 15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR
61088). You can also find later actions concerning Virginia's program
and program amendments at 30 CFR 946.12, 946.13, and 946.15.
[[Page 17807]]
II. Description of the Submission
By letter dated June 11, 2008, the Virginia Department of Mines,
Minerals, and Energy (DMME) sent us an informal proposed amendment to
its program for a pre-submission review (VA-126-INF). We reviewed the
pre-submission and responded to the DMME, with comments, via electronic
mail on July 2, 2008. By letter dated July 17, 2008, the DMME formally
submitted the proposed amendments to its program (Administrative Record
No. VA-1089). We announced receipt of the amendment in the August 29,
2008, Federal Register (73 FR 50915).
OSM's review of the July 17, 2008, submittal identified several
issues that we presented to the DMME. The first discussion occurred by
telephone on September 4, 2008. As a result of that discussion the DMME
submitted on the same date via electronic mail Memorandum 13-
86 which specifies application processing time limits for new permits
and revision applications (Administrative Record No. VA-1093). The
complete text of the Memorandum can be found at https://www.dmme.virginia.gov/DMLR/docs/operatormemos. A subsequent meeting was
held on October 16, 2008 (Administrative Record No. VA-1099). In an
electronic mail message dated October 29, 2008 (Administrative Record
No. VA-2000), the DMME provided its position in response to OSM's
comments and agreed to expeditiously submit additional changes. On
November 3, 2008, the DMME responded by submitting regulation changes
via electronic mail (Administrative Record No. VA-2001). OSM provided
additional comments on the regulation changes on November 13, 2008
(Administrative Record No. VA-2002), and the DMME responded to these
comments on November 20, 2008, by electronic mail (Administrative
Record No. VA-2003). The DMME proposes the following changes:
1. 4VAC25-130-700.5 Definitions.
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
761.5. The DMME proposes to modify the definition of Valid Existing
Rights (VER). As proposed, the definition will read as follows (revised
text in italics):
``Valid existing rights'' means a set of circumstances under which
a person may, subject to Division approval, conduct surface coal mining
operations on lands where Section 45.1-252 D of the Act and Section
4VAC25-130-761.11 of the regulations would otherwise prohibit such
operations. The possession of valid existing rights only confers an
exception from the prohibitions of Sections 45.1-252 D and 4VAC25-130-
761.11. A person seeking to exercise valid existing rights must comply
with all pertinent requirements of the Act and the regulations
promulgated thereunder, and would need:
(a) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this definition, a
demonstration of the legally binding conveyance, lease, deed, contract,
or other document which vests the person, or predecessor in interest,
with the right to conduct the type of surface coal mining operations
intended. The right must exist at the time the land came under the
protection of Sections 4VAC25-130-761.11 and 45.1-252 D.
2. 4VAC25-130-761.11 Areas where mining is prohibited or limited;
4VAC25-130-761.12 Exception for existing operations; 4VAC25-130-761.16
Submission and processing of requests for valid existing rights
determinations; 4VAC25-130-772.12 Permit requirements for exploration
removing more than 250 tons of coal.
The corresponding Federal regulations for the following sections
are 30 CFR 761.11, 761.12, 761.16, and 772.12. The DMME proposes to add
new sections 4VAC25-130-761.12, and 4VAC25-130-761.16 and revise
4VAC25-130-761.11 and 4VAC25-130-772.12 to read as follows:
(a) 4VAC25-130-761.11. Areas where mining is prohibited or limited.
(Revised) Delete Paragraph (h) which reads as follows: There will be no
surface coal mining, permitting, licensing, or exploration of Federal
Lands in the National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System,
National System of Trails, National Wilderness Preservation System,
Wild and Scenic Rivers System, or National Recreation Areas, unless
called for by Acts of Congress.
(b) 4VAC25-130-761.12 Exception for existing operations. (New) The
prohibitions and limitations of 4VAC25-130-761.11 do not apply to
surface coal mining operations for which a valid permit, issued under
Subchapter VG of this chapter, exists when the land comes under the
protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11. This exception applies only to lands
within the permit area as it exists when the land comes under the
protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11.
(c) 4VAC25-130-761.16 Submission and processing of requests for
valid existing rights determinations. (New)
(a) Basic framework for valid existing rights determinations. The
table of 30 CFR 761.16(a) identifies the agency responsible for making
a valid existing rights determination and the definition that it must
use, based upon which subsection of 30 CFR 761.11 or 4VAC25-130-761.11
applies and whether the request includes federal lands.
(b) A request for a valid existing rights determination must be
submitted to the Division, if a person intends to conduct surface coal
mining operations on the basis of valid existing rights under 4VAC25-
130-761.11 or wishes to confirm the right to do so. The request may be
submitted before the person prepares and submits an application for a
permit or boundary revision for the land.
(1) The person must provide a property rights demonstration under
the definition of valid existing rights if the request relies upon the
``good faith/all permits'' or the ``needed for and adjacent'' standard
set forth in the valid existing rights definition in 4VAC25-130-700.5.
For the land subject to the request, the demonstration must include:
(i) A legal description of the land.
(ii) Complete documentation of the character and extent of the
person's current interests in the surface and mineral estates of the
land.
(iii) A complete chain of title for the surface and mineral estates
of the land.
(iv) A description of the nature and effect of each title
instrument that forms the basis for the request, including any
provision pertaining to the type or method of mining or mining-related
surface disturbances and facilities.
(v) A description of the type and extent of surface coal mining
operations that the person claims the right to conduct, including the
method of mining, any mining-related surface activities and facilities,
and an explanation of how those operations would be consistent with
Virginia property law.
(vi) Complete documentation of the nature and ownership, as of the
date that the land came under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or
Section 45.1-252, of all property rights for the surface and mineral
estates.
(vii) Names and addresses of the current owners of the surface and
mineral estates of the land.
(viii) If the coal interests have been severed from other property
interests, documentation that the person has notified and provided
reasonable opportunity for the owners of other property interests in
the land to comment on the validity of the person's property rights
claims.
[[Page 17808]]
(ix) Any comments that the person receives in response to the
notification provided under subdivision (b)(1)(viii).
(2) If the request relies upon the good faith/all permits standard
in subdivision (b)(1) of the valid existing rights definition in
4VAC25-130-700.5, in addition to the information provided by
subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the person must also submit the
information about permits, licenses, and authorizations for surface
coal mining operations on the land subject to the request that the
person or predecessor in interest obtained, submitted, or made:
(i) Approval and issuance dates and identification numbers for any
permits, licenses, and authorizations obtained before the land came
under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252.
(ii) Application dates and identification numbers for any permits,
licenses, and authorizations submitted before the land came under the
protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252.
(iii) An explanation of any other good faith effort made to obtain
the necessary permits, licenses, and authorizations as of the date that
the land came under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section
45.1-252.
(3) If the request relies upon the needed for and adjacent standard
in subdivision (b)(2) of the valid existing rights definition in
4VAC25-130-700.5, in addition to the information provided by
subdivision (b)(1) of this section, the person must explain how and why
the land is needed for and immediately adjacent to the operation upon
which the request is based, including a demonstration that prohibiting
expansion of the operation onto that land would unfairly impact the
viability of the operation as originally planned before the land came
under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252.
(4) If the request relies upon one of the standards for roads in
subdivisions (c)(1-3) of the valid existing rights definition in
4VAC25-130-700.5, the person must submit satisfactory documentation
that:
(i) The road existed when the land upon which it is located came
under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252, and the
person has a legal right to use the road for surface coal mining
operations;
(ii) A properly recorded right of way or easement for a road in
that location existed when the land came under the protection of
4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252, and, under the document creating
the right of way or easement, and under any subsequent conveyances, the
person has a legal right to use or construct a road across that right
of way or easement to conduct surface coal mining operations; or
(iii) A valid permit for use or construction of a road in that
location for surface coal mining operations existed when the land came
under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252.
(c) Initial review of request. The Division must conduct an initial
review to determine whether the request includes all applicable
components of the submission requirements of subsection (b). The review
pertains only to the completeness of the request, not the legal or
technical adequacy of the materials submitted.
(2) If the request does not include all applicable components of
the submission requirements of subsection (b), the Division must notify
the person and establish a reasonable time for submission of the
missing information. Should the person not provide the information
requested by the Division under this subdivision, within the time
specified or as subsequently extended, the Division must issue a
determination under subdivision (e)(4) that the person has not
demonstrated valid existing rights.
(3) When the request includes all applicable components of the
submission requirements of subsection (b), the Division must implement
the notice and comment requirements of subsection (d).
(d)(1) When the division determines that the request satisfies the
completeness requirements of subsection (c), it shall publish a notice
in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the land
is located inviting public comment on the merits of the request. OSMRE
will publish a similar notice in the Federal Register if the request
involves Federal lands within an area listed in 4VAC25-130-761.11(a) or
(b). The public notice must include:
(i) The location of the land to which the request pertains.
(ii) A description of the type of surface coal mining operations
planned.
(iii) A reference to and brief description of the applicable
standard(s) under the definition of valid existing rights in 4VAC25-
130-700.5.
(A) If the request relies upon the ``good faith/all permits'' or
the ``needed for and adjacent'' standard set forth in the valid
existing rights definition in 4VAC25-130-700.5, the notice must include
a description of the property rights that the person claims and the
basis for the claim.
(B) If the request relies upon the road standard set forth in
subdivision (c)(1) of the valid existing rights definition in 4VAC25-
130-700.5, the notice must include a description of the basis for the
claim that the road existed when the land came under the protection of
4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section 45.1-252. In addition, the notice must
include a description of the basis for the claim that the person has a
legal right to use that road for surface coal mining operations.
(C) If the request relies upon the standard in subdivision (c)(2)
of the valid existing rights definition in 4VAC25-130-700.5, the notice
must include a description of the basis for the claim that a properly
recorded right of way or easement for a road in that location existed
when the land came under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11 or Section
45.1-252. In addition, the notice must include a description of the
basis for the claim that, under the document creating the right of way
or easement, and under any subsequent conveyances, the person has a
legal right to use or construct a road across the right of way or
easement to conduct surface coal mining operations.
(iv) If the request relies upon one or more of the standards in
subdivisions (b) and (c)(1and 2) and (c)(2) of the valid existing
rights definition in 4VAC25-130-700.5, a statement that the Division
will not make a decision on the merits of the request if, by the close
of the comment period under the notice or the notice required by
subdivision (d)(3), a person with a legal interest in the land
initiates appropriate legal action in the proper venue to resolve any
differences concerning the validity or interpretation of the deed,
lease, easement, or other documents that form the basis of the valid
existing rights claim.
(v) A description of the procedures the division will follow in
processing the request.
(vi) The closing date of the public comment period, which shall be
a minimum of 30 days after the notice's publication date.
(vii) A statement that interested persons may request, in writing,
from the Division a 30 day extension of the public comment period. The
extension request shall set forth with reasonable specificity, the
reasons the commenter needs the additional time to submit comments.
(viii) Include the Division office's address where a copy of the
valid existing rights request is available for public inspection and to
where comments and requests for extension of the comment period should
be sent.
[[Page 17809]]
(2) The Division must promptly provide a copy of the notice
required under subdivision (d)(1) to:
(i) All reasonably locatable owners of surface and mineral estates
in the land included in the valid existing rights request.
(ii) The owner of the feature causing the land to come under the
protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11, and, when applicable, the agency(ies)
with primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect to the values
causing the land to come under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11.
(3) The notice required under subdivision (d)(2) must provide a 30
day comment period, and specify that another 30 days may be granted for
good cause shown at the discretion of the Division or agency
responsible for the valid existing rights determination.
(e)(1) The division or agency responsible for making the valid
existing rights determination must review the materials submitted under
subsection (b), comments received under subsection (d), and any other
relevant, reasonably available information to determine whether the
record is sufficiently complete and adequate to support a decision on
the merits of the request. If not, the division must notify the person
in writing, explaining the inadequacy of the record and requesting
submittal, within a specified reasonable time, of any additional
information that the division deems necessary to remedy the inadequacy.
(2) Once the record is complete and adequate, the Division must
determine whether you have demonstrated valid existing rights. The
Division's decision must explain how the person has or has not
satisfied all applicable elements of the valid existing rights
definition under 4VAC25-130-700.5, contain findings of fact and
conclusions, and specify the reasons for the conclusions.
(3) When the request relies upon one or more of the standards in
subdivisions (b) and (c)(1 and 2) of the valid existing rights
definition in 4VAC25-130-700.5, the Division:
(i) Must issue a determination that the person has not demonstrated
valid existing rights if the property rights claim is the subject of
pending litigation in a court or administrative body with jurisdiction
over the property rights in question. The division will make the
determination without prejudice, meaning that the person may refile the
request once the property rights dispute is finally adjudicated. This
applies only to situations in which legal action has been initiated as
of the closing date of the comment period under subdivisions (d)(1) or
(d)(3).
(ii) If the record indicates disagreement as to the accuracy of the
person's property rights claim, but the disagreement is not the subject
of pending litigation in a court or administrative agency of competent
jurisdiction, must evaluate the merits of the information in the record
and determine whether the person has demonstrated that the requisite
property rights exist under subdivision (a), (c)(1), or (c)(2) of the
valid existing rights definition in 4VAC25-130-700.5, as appropriate.
The Division must then proceed with the decision process under
subdivision (e)(2) of this section.
(4) The Division must issue a determination that the person has not
demonstrated valid existing rights if the person does not submit
information that the division requests under subdivision (c)(2) or
(e)(1) of this section within the time specified or as subsequently
extended. The Division will make the determination without prejudice,
meaning the person may refile a revised request at any time.
(5) After making a valid existing rights determination, the
Division shall:
(i) Provide the person a copy of the determination with an
explanation of appeal rights and procedures to the person seeking the
determination, owner or owners of the land to which the determination
applies, owner of the feature causing the land to come under the
protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11, and, when applicable, the agency with
primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect to the values that
caused the land to come under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11.
(ii) Publish notice of the determination in a newspaper of general
circulation in the county in which the land is located. OSMRE will
publish the determination, together with an explanation of appeal
rights and procedures, in the Federal Register if the request includes
Federal lands within an area listed in 4VAC25-130-761.11(a) or (b).
(f) The division's valid existing rights determination shall be
subject to administrative and judicial review under 4VAC25-130-775.11
and 4VAC25-130-775.13.
(g) The division must make a copy of the valid existing rights
determination request available to the public as provided by 4VAC25-
130-773.13(d), and the records associated with that request, and any
subsequent determination under subsection (e) of this section,
available to the public in accordance with 4VAC25-130-840.14.
(d) 4VAC25-130-772.12. Permit requirements for exploration removing
more than 250 tons of coal, or occurring on lands designated as
unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. (Revised by adding
paragraphs (b)(14) and (d)(2)(iv))
(b) Application Information. Each application for an exploration
permit shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(14) For any lands listed in 4VAC25-130-761.11, a demonstration
that, to the extent technologically and economically feasible, the
proposed exploration activities have been designed to minimize
interference with the values for which those lands were designated as
unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. The application must
include documentation of consultation with the owner of the feature
causing the land to come under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11,
and, when applicable, with the agency with primary jurisdiction over
the feature with respect to the values that caused the land to come
under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11.
(d) Decisions on applications for exploration.
(2) The Division shall approve a complete and accurate application
for a coal exploration permit filed in accordance with this Part if it
finds, in writing, that the applicant has demonstrated that the
exploration and reclamation described in the application will:
(iv) With respect to exploration activities on any lands protected
under 4VAC25-130-761.11, minimize interference, to the extent
technologically and economically feasible, with the values for which
those lands were designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining
operations. Before making this finding, the division must provide
reasonable opportunity to the owner of the feature causing the land to
come under the protection of 4VAC25-130-761.11, and, when applicable,
to the agency with primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect
to the values that caused the land to come under the protection of
4VAC25-130-761.11, to comment on whether the finding is appropriate.
3. 4VAC25-130-773.21 Improvidently issued permits; rescission
procedures.
The corresponding Federal regulation is 30 CFR 773.23(c)(2). At
subsection (b), the DMME proposes to require that the division shall
post notice of a permit suspension or rescission at its offices and on
its internet home page. At subsection (e), the DMME proposes to require
that if a permittee files an appeal
[[Page 17810]]
for administrative review of the notice or decision under subsection
(c) under Sec. 4VAC25-130-775.11 and Sec. 2.2-4000 et seq of the Code
of Virginia, the notice of the public hearing scheduled under this
subsection will be posted at the division office located nearest to the
permit.
4. 4VAC25-130-773.13 Public participation in permit processing.
The corresponding Federal regulation is 30 CFR 773.6. The DMME
proposes to change ``paragraph'' to ``subsection'' in section (b)(1).
5. 4VAC25-130-774.12 Post-permit issuance requirements.
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
774.11. The DMME proposes to change ``paragraph'' to ``subsection'' in
section (e).
6. 4VAC25-130-774.17 Transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights.
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
774.17. The DMME proposes to change ``paragraph'' to ``subsection'' in
section (a).
7. 4VAC130-778.13 Identification of interests.
The corresponding Federal regulation for this section is 30 CFR
778.11. The DMME proposes to change ``paragraph(s)'' to
``subsection(s)'' in sections (c), (d), (k), and (m).
8. 4VAC25-130-801.13 Self-bonding.
There is no direct Federal counterpart regulation for this section.
The DMME proposes to change ``paragraph'' to ``subdivision'' in
sections (a)(3), (a)(7), and (b).
9. 4VAC25-130-840.14 Aailability of records.
The corresponding Federal regulation is 30 CFR 840.14(c). The DMME
proposes to post a notice that states in part: Pursuant to Sec. 2.1-
340 et seq. of the Code of Virginia, as amended, and Sec. Sec. 4 VAC
25-130-700.14, 4 VAC 25-130-702.13, 4 VAC 25-130-772.15, 4 VAC 25-130-
773.13(d), and 4 VAC 25-130-840.14 (b) of the Virginia Coal Surface
Mining Reclamation Regulations, the Division of Mined Land Reclamation
(DMLR) will make available copies of all records, reports, inspection
materials, permit applications, or information obtained by the Division
for public inspection and copying. The Division will maintain the
information at its principal office located in Big Stone Gap, Virginia.
The information will also be made available upon request at the
Division's Lebanon office. The DMLR may, upon request, provide the
information at other Federal, State, or local government office(s)
located in the county where the mining is or may be proposed to occur,
or provide the information electronically to the requestor. If a person
wishes to inspect the information, he or she may visit or call one of
DMLR's offices, or send an electronic request. Information regarding
laws, regulations, public participation, complaints, guidance
documents, procedures to request information, and other topics may be
obtained from the DMLR's office or accessed through the DMLR's internet
site. This notice will be sent to Circuit Court Clerks of coal-
producing counties (Lee, Wise, Scott, Dickenson, Russell, Tazewell,
Buchanan); posted at DMLR offices; and placed on the DMME webpage.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the submission satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Virginia program.
Electronic or Written Comments
If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined
to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason
for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but
those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final
regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or
include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history,
its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or
Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant
publications. We cannot ensure that comments received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES) or sent to an address other than
those listed above (see ADDRESSES) will be included in the docket for
this rulemaking and considered.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: January 22, 2009.
Thomas D. Shope,
Regional Director.
Editorial Note: This document was received in the Office of the
Federal Register on Tuesday, April 14, 2009.
[FR Doc. E9-8883 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P