Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia; Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Plan, 17783-17785 [E9-8784]
Download as PDF
17783
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
1997, and section 14.3, effective on July
2, 2007.
*
*
*
*
*
State regulation
*
Title 7, Chapter 27.
State effective date
*
§ 52.1605 EPA-approved New Jersey
regulations.
3. Section 52.1605 is amended by
revising the entry for Subchapter 14
under Title 7, Chapter 27 to read as
follows:
■
EPA approved date
*
*
Comments
*
*
*
*
Subchapter 14, ‘‘Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution from DieselPowered Motor Vehicles’’.
*
....................................
*
*
..............................................................
Sections 14.1–14.3 ..............................
Section 14.1 .........................................
July 1, 1985 ...............
July 2, 2007 ...............
Section 14.2 .........................................
September 15, 1997
Section 14.3 .........................................
July 2, 2007 ...............
June 13, 1986. ....................................
April 17, 2009 [Insert Federal Register page citation].
April 17, 2009 [Insert Federal Register page citation].
April 17, 2009 [Insert Federal Register page citation].
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–8762 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2009–0181; FRL–8892–8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Georgia;
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance
Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
*
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by Georgia Department of
Natural Resources (GA DNR) through
the Georgia Environmental Protection
Division (GA EPD) on February 13,
2009. The revisions include minor
changes to Georgia’s Air Quality Rules
found at Chapter 391–3–20-.17,
pertaining to rules for Enhanced
Inspection and Maintenance (I/M).
Specifically, the changes update the
amount of repair costs that may qualify
for a waiver. This action is being taken
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
June 16, 2009, without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by May 18, 2009. If adverse comment is
received, EPA will publish a timely
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
*
*
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2009–0181 by one of the following
methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2009–
0181,’’ Regulatory Development Section;
Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae
Benjamin, Regulatory Development
Section; Air Planning Branch; Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2009–
0181.’’ EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
*
*
On September 15, 1997, section 14.2
was re-numbered to 14.6. The State
did not submit this change as a SIP
revision. Therefore, the July 1,
1985, version of section 14.2 will
continue to be the EPA-approved
regulation.
Sfmt 4700
*
*
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
through https://www.regulations.gov or
e-mail, information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access,’’ which means
EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comments. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA
without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM
17APR1
17784
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other materials, such as
copyrighted material, are not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in the hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section;
Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mohammad Madjdinasab, Regulatory
Development Section; Air Planning
Branch; Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9026.
Mr. Madjdinasab can also be reached via
electronic mail at
madjdinasab.mohammad@epa.gov. For
information relating to the Georgia State
SIP, contact Ms. Stacy Harder. Ms.
Harder may be reached at (404) 562–
9042, or harder.stacy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Analysis of the State’s Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The I/M program is a way to ensure
that vehicles are maintained properly
and verify that the emission control
system is operating correctly, in order to
reduce vehicle-related emissions.
Enhanced I/M was required for 1-hour
ozone nonattainment areas classified as
serious nonattainment and above, under
the CAA. Georgia implemented an
enhanced I/M program for the 13-county
Atlanta 1-hour ozone area in 1996 to
fulfill the requirements under the CAA
for a serious nonattainment area.
Georgia was able to demonstrate
attainment with the 1-hour ozone
standard in 2005 for the Atlanta 1-hour
ozone nonattainment area (referred to
hereafter as the ‘‘Atlanta area’’).
However, on April 30, 2004, the Atlanta
area was designated nonattainment for
the 8-hour ozone standard (69 FR
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Apr 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
23857), and the area was expanded from
13 to 20 counties. The Atlanta area was
first classified as a marginal
nonattainment area and later
reclassified to a moderate
nonattainment area on March 6, 2008
(73 FR 12013).
The enhanced I/M program is no
longer a required measure for Atlanta
for the 8-hour ozone standard pursuant
to the CAA because the area is now
classified as a moderate non-attainment
area (73 FR 12013). However, the
enhanced I/M program was approved
into the SIP for the 1-hour ozone
standard and must remain in the SIP
until such time that the State removes
the requirement, pursuant to section
110(l) of the CAA. On February 13,
2009, GA EPD provided its annual
submission to update the waiver
provision related to its enhanced I/M
rule. This submission was provided to
satisfy 40 CFR 51.360(a)(7). Specifically,
40 CFR 51.360(a)(7) states ‘‘Beginning
on January 1, 1998, enhanced I/M
programs shall require the motorist to
make an expenditure of at least $450 in
repairs to qualify for a waiver. The I/M
program shall provide that the $450
minimum expenditure shall be adjusted
in January of each year by the
percentage, if any, by which the
Consumer Price Index for the preceding
calendar year differs from the Consumer
Price Index of 1989. Prior to January 1,
1998, States may adopt any minimum
expenditure commensurate with the
waiver rate committed to for the
purposes of modeling compliance with
the relevant enhanced I/M performance
standard.’’
II. Analysis of the State’s Submittal
In accordance with 40 CFR
51.360(a)(7), Rule 391–3–20-.17
‘‘Waivers’’ was revised effective January
1, 2009, to adjust the minimum amount
that must be paid on qualifying repairs
after a vehicle fails an initial test in
order to be granted a wavier from
complying with the inspection
requirements for the corresponding
registration period. A minimum repair
cost of $450 must be made on qualifying
repairs after the vehicle fails the initial
test. The $450 level will be adjusted
each year to reflect the change in the
Consumer Price Index after 1989. These
revisions became State effective on
December 28, 2008. In the February 13,
2009, submittal, State of Georgia stated
that this change will not have a negative
impact on small business owners that
conduct vehicle inspections. Further,
there is no change in cost to the general
public, as these fees used to be adjusted
annually utilizing the Consumer Price
Index and submitted to EPA for
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
approval annually. GA EPD is simply
making this SIP revision to avoid the
submission of minimum required repair
cost and revising their SIP annually.
III. Final Action
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve the aforementioned revisions,
specifically, Chapter 391–30–20-.17
Subparagraph (2)(a) into the Georgia
SIP. These revisions submitted by GA
EPD on February 13, 2009, are
consistent with CAA requirements, and
EPA policy and guidance.
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the agency views
this as a noncontroversial submittal and
anticipates no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication,
EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to
approve the SIP revision should adverse
comments be filed. This rule will be
effective June 16, 2009 without further
notice unless the Agency receives
adverse comments by May 18, 2009.
If EPA receives such comments, then
EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments
received will then be addressed in a
subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period. Parties
interested in commenting should do so
at this time. If no such comments are
received, the public is advised that this
rule will be effective on June 16, 2009
and no further action will be taken on
the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM
17APR1
17785
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 73 / Friday, April 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in an Indian
country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal laws.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 16, 2009.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 3, 2009.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart L—Georgia
2. Section 52.570(c) is amended by
revising the entry for ‘‘391–3–20’’ to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.570
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
Chapter 52
*
*
*
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance ......
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–8784 Filed 4–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
12/28/2008
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Wisconsin: Final Authorization of State
Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
15:01 Apr 16, 2009
*
*
*
04/17/2009 [Insert citation of publication].
[EPA–R05–RCRA–2008–0712; FRL–8789–6]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Explanation
*
Attainment and Maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
*
391–3–20 .........
*
EPA approval date
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Final rule.
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
SUMMARY: EPA is granting Wisconsin
final authorization of the changes to its
hazardous waste program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). The agency published a
proposed rule on November 25, 2008 at
73 FR 71583 and provided for public
comment. The public comment period
ended on December 26, 2008. We
received no comments. No further
opportunity for comment will be
provided. EPA has determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements
needed to qualify for final authorization,
and is proposing to authorize the State’s
E:\FR\FM\17APR1.SGM
17APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 73 (Friday, April 17, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17783-17785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8784]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0181; FRL-8892-8]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia;
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by Georgia Department of
Natural Resources (GA DNR) through the Georgia Environmental Protection
Division (GA EPD) on February 13, 2009. The revisions include minor
changes to Georgia's Air Quality Rules found at Chapter 391-3-20-.17,
pertaining to rules for Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance (I/M).
Specifically, the changes update the amount of repair costs that may
qualify for a waiver. This action is being taken pursuant to section
110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 16, 2009, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 18, 2009. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2009-0181 by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0181,'' Regulatory Development Section;
Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Regulatory
Development Section; Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR-
2009-0181.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access,'' which means EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comments.
If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an
electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
[[Page 17784]]
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other materials,
such as copyrighted material, are not placed on the Internet and will
be publicly available only in the hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section; Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mohammad Madjdinasab, Regulatory
Development Section; Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9026. Mr. Madjdinasab can also be reached via electronic
mail at madjdinasab.mohammad@epa.gov. For information relating to the
Georgia State SIP, contact Ms. Stacy Harder. Ms. Harder may be reached
at (404) 562-9042, or harder.stacy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Analysis of the State's Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
The I/M program is a way to ensure that vehicles are maintained
properly and verify that the emission control system is operating
correctly, in order to reduce vehicle-related emissions. Enhanced I/M
was required for 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas classified as serious
nonattainment and above, under the CAA. Georgia implemented an enhanced
I/M program for the 13-county Atlanta 1-hour ozone area in 1996 to
fulfill the requirements under the CAA for a serious nonattainment
area. Georgia was able to demonstrate attainment with the 1-hour ozone
standard in 2005 for the Atlanta 1-hour ozone nonattainment area
(referred to hereafter as the ``Atlanta area''). However, on April 30,
2004, the Atlanta area was designated nonattainment for the 8-hour
ozone standard (69 FR 23857), and the area was expanded from 13 to 20
counties. The Atlanta area was first classified as a marginal
nonattainment area and later reclassified to a moderate nonattainment
area on March 6, 2008 (73 FR 12013).
The enhanced I/M program is no longer a required measure for
Atlanta for the 8-hour ozone standard pursuant to the CAA because the
area is now classified as a moderate non-attainment area (73 FR 12013).
However, the enhanced I/M program was approved into the SIP for the 1-
hour ozone standard and must remain in the SIP until such time that the
State removes the requirement, pursuant to section 110(l) of the CAA.
On February 13, 2009, GA EPD provided its annual submission to update
the waiver provision related to its enhanced I/M rule. This submission
was provided to satisfy 40 CFR 51.360(a)(7). Specifically, 40 CFR
51.360(a)(7) states ``Beginning on January 1, 1998, enhanced I/M
programs shall require the motorist to make an expenditure of at least
$450 in repairs to qualify for a waiver. The I/M program shall provide
that the $450 minimum expenditure shall be adjusted in January of each
year by the percentage, if any, by which the Consumer Price Index for
the preceding calendar year differs from the Consumer Price Index of
1989. Prior to January 1, 1998, States may adopt any minimum
expenditure commensurate with the waiver rate committed to for the
purposes of modeling compliance with the relevant enhanced I/M
performance standard.''
II. Analysis of the State's Submittal
In accordance with 40 CFR 51.360(a)(7), Rule 391-3-20-.17
``Waivers'' was revised effective January 1, 2009, to adjust the
minimum amount that must be paid on qualifying repairs after a vehicle
fails an initial test in order to be granted a wavier from complying
with the inspection requirements for the corresponding registration
period. A minimum repair cost of $450 must be made on qualifying
repairs after the vehicle fails the initial test. The $450 level will
be adjusted each year to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index
after 1989. These revisions became State effective on December 28,
2008. In the February 13, 2009, submittal, State of Georgia stated that
this change will not have a negative impact on small business owners
that conduct vehicle inspections. Further, there is no change in cost
to the general public, as these fees used to be adjusted annually
utilizing the Consumer Price Index and submitted to EPA for approval
annually. GA EPD is simply making this SIP revision to avoid the
submission of minimum required repair cost and revising their SIP
annually.
III. Final Action
EPA is taking direct final action to approve the aforementioned
revisions, specifically, Chapter 391-30-20-.17 Subparagraph (2)(a) into
the Georgia SIP. These revisions submitted by GA EPD on February 13,
2009, are consistent with CAA requirements, and EPA policy and
guidance.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 16, 2009
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by
May 18, 2009.
If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on June 16, 2009 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
[[Page 17785]]
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in an Indian country located
in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal laws.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 16, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed
rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 3, 2009.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart L--Georgia
0
2. Section 52.570(c) is amended by revising the entry for ``391-3-20''
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Georgia Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 52 Attainment and Maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
391-3-20................. Enhanced Inspection 12/28/2008 04/17/2009 [Insert
and Maintenance. citation of
publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-8784 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P