Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit River, Detroit, MI, 17627-17630 [E9-8759]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
involves establishing a safety zone
around a fireworks display. The display
is taking place on a beach and the safety
zone is intended to keep mariners away
from any hazardous materials that may
land in the water. A preliminary
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and preliminary categorical exclusion
determination, supporting this
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ section of this preamble.
This rule is categorically excluded,
under section 2.B.2. Figure 2–1,
paragraph 34(g), of the Instruction and
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to discovery
of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
tjames on PRODPC75 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:32 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
3306, 3703 and Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
2. Add § 165.T05–0012 to read as
follows:
17627
RIN 1625–AA00
§ 165.T05–0012 Safety Zone: Gwynn Island
4th of July Fireworks, Piankatank River,
Gwynn Island, VA.
(a) Regulated Area: The following area
is a safety zone: specified waters of the
Piankatank River located within a 560
feet radius of the fireworks display at
the approximate position of 37°29″22′
N/76°18″54′ W (NAD 1983) in the
vicinity of Gwynn Island, VA.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative
means: any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his/her behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or
his/her designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
Number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced on July 4,
2009, from 9 p.m. until 10:15 p.m., with
a rain date of July 5, 2009, from 9 p.m.
until 10:15 p.m.
Dated: April 2, 2009.
Patrick B. Trapp,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. E9–8722 Filed 4–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0089]
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit
River, Detroit, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan.
This Zone is intended to restrict vessels
from portions of the Detroit River during
the Red Bull Air Race. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with air races.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 1, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–0089 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
17628
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0089),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. A comment submitted
online via https://www.regulations.gov
will be considered received by the Coast
Guard when the comment is
successfully transmitted; a comment
submitted via fax, hand delivery, or
mail, will be considered as having been
received by the Coast Guard when the
comment is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2009–0089’’ in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the balloon
shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 8c by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
tjames on PRODPC75 with PROPOSALS
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2009–0089 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:32 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
Docket ID column. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The proposed temporary safety zone
is necessary to ensure, to the extent
practicable, the safety of vessels and the
public from hazards associated with an
air race. The Captain of the Port Detroit
has determined that air races in close
proximity to watercraft and
infrastructure pose a significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, airplanes traveling at
high speeds and performing aerial
acrobatics, and large numbers of
spectators in close proximity on the
water could result in serious injuries or
fatalities. Establishing a safety zone
around the location of the race course
will help ensure the safety of persons
and property at these events and help
minimize the associated risks. Likewise,
the Windsor Port Authority intends to
restrict vessel movement on the
Canadian side of the Detroit River. The
exclusionary area on the Canadian side
will be aligned with the east and west
borders of the U.S. safety zone and will
extend to the shoreline along Windsor,
ON.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to
ensure safety of the public and vessels
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
during the setup, course familiarization,
time trials, and race in conjunction with
the Red Bull Air Race. The air race and
associated set-up and removal will
occur between 9 a.m., June 11, 2009 and
6:30 p.m., June 14, 2009. The safety
zone will be enforced daily from 9 a.m.
to 6:30 p.m., June 11th through 14th,
2009. Specifically, on June 11–12, 2009,
the river closure will be enforced as
needed and therefore will be
intermittent. On June 13, 2009, the river
closure will total no more than 5 hours
between the hours of 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.
On June 14, 2009, the river closure will
total no more than 6 hours between the
hours of 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The Coast
Guard expects to have additional
information from the event organizer
before publication of the final rule, and
expects to provide more specific
information in the final rule regarding
hours of enforcement for each day.
The safety zone will encompass all
navigable waters of the United States on
the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound by
a line extending from a point on land
southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42°19.4′ N; 083°3.3′ W, northeast along
the Detroit shoreline to a point on land
at position 42°20.0′ N; 083°1.2′ W,
southeast to the international border
with Canada at position 42°19.8′ N
083°1.0′ W, southwest along the
international border to position 42°19.2′
N; 083°3.3′ W, and northwest to the
point of origin at position 42°19.4′ N;
083°3.3′ W. (DATUM: NAD 83). The
Captain of the Port will cause notice of
enforcement of the safety zone
established by this section to be made
by all appropriate means to the affected
segments of the public. Such means of
notification will include, but are not
limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and Local Notice to Mariners. The
Captain of the Port will issue a
broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying
the public when enforcement of the
safety zone is terminated.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
minimal adverse impact to mariners
from the zone’s activation.
tjames on PRODPC75 with PROPOSALS
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the above portion of the Detroit River
between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. on June 11,
through June 14, 2009.
The proposed safety zone will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: This rule will
be in effect for approximately six hours
each day of the race. Additionally, small
entities such as passenger vessels, have
been involved in the planning stages for
this event and have had ample time to
make alternate arrangements with
regards to mooring positions and
business operations during the hours
this safety zone will be in place.
Furthermore, local sailing and yacht
clubs will be notified prior to the event,
by Coast Guard Station Belle Isle, with
information on what to expect during
the event with the intention of
minimizing interruptions in their
normal business practices. In the event
that this temporary safety zone affects
shipping, commercial vessels may
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Detroit to transit through the
safety zone. The Coast Guard will give
notice to the public via a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners that the regulation is
in effect. Additionally, the COTP will
suspend enforcement of the safety zone
if the event, for which the zone is
established, ends earlier than the
expected time.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:32 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact CDR Joseph
Snowden, Prevention Department,
Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone
(313) 568–9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17629
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
17630
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone. Based on our preliminary
determination, there are no factors in
this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we
believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. Because this event
establishes a safety zone, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction applies.
We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
tjames on PRODPC75 with PROPOSALS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
3306, 3703 and Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 165.T09–0089 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air
Race, Detroit River, Detroit, MI.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All U.S. waters
of the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound
by a line extending from a point on land
southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42°19.4′ N; 083°3.3′ W, northeast along
the Detroit shoreline to a point on land
at position 42°20.0′ N; 083°1.2′ W,
southeast to the international boarder
with Canada at position 42°19.8′ N
083°1.0′ W, southwest along the
international border to position 42°19.2′
N; 083°3.3′ W, and northwest to the
point of origin at position 42°19.4′ N;
083°3.3′ W. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Enforcement Period. The safety
zone will be enforced daily from 9 a.m.
to 6:30 p.m. on June 11, 2009 through
June 14, 2009.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit, or his
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Detroit or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Detroit
or his on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so.
(5) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the Captain of the Port or his
on-scene representative.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Dated: March 26, 2009.
J.D. Jenkins,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. E9–8759 Filed 4–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
2. Section 165.T09–0089 is added to
read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:32 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50 CFR Part 300
RIN 0648–AX72
Identification and Certification of
Nations Whose Fishing Vessels Are
Engaged in Illegal, Unreported, or
Unregulated Fishing or Bycatch of
Protected Living Marine Resources
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing; request
for comments.
SUMMARY: On January 14, 2009, NMFS
published a proposed rule for
developing identification and
certification procedures to address
illegal, unreported, or unregulated (IUU)
fishing activities and bycatch of
protected living marine resources
(PLMRs) pursuant to the High Seas
Driftnet Fishing Moratorium Protection
Act (Moratorium Protection Act). On
March 3, 2009, NMFS announced five
public hearings to discuss and collect
comments on the issues described in the
proposed rule. This notice is to
announce an additional public hearing.
DATES: The additional hearing will be
held on April 27, 2009, from 11:00 a.m.
to 1:00 p.m. The due date for written
comments has not changed and must be
received no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on May 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The additional public
hearing will be held at 1601 Kapiolani
Blvd, 11th Floor, (the main reception is
on the 11th floor and all visitors must
check in), Honolulu, HI 96814; phone
808–944–2280.
Written comments on this action,
identified by RIN 0648–AV51, may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Laura Cimo, Trade and Marine
Stewardship Division, Office of
International Affairs, NMFS, 1315 East–
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
Instructions: All comments received
are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
E:\FR\FM\16APP1.SGM
16APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 72 (Thursday, April 16, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17627-17630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8759]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0089]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit River, Detroit, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on the Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan. This Zone is intended to
restrict vessels from portions of the Detroit River during the Red Bull
Air Race. This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect spectators
and vessels from the hazards associated with air races.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 1, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-0089 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention Department, Sector
Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9580, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 17628]]
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0089), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. A comment submitted
online via https://www.regulations.gov will be considered received by
the Coast Guard when the comment is successfully transmitted; a comment
submitted via fax, hand delivery, or mail, will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when the comment is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-2009-0089'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8[frac12] by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG-2009-0089 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
The proposed temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure, to the
extent practicable, the safety of vessels and the public from hazards
associated with an air race. The Captain of the Port Detroit has
determined that air races in close proximity to watercraft and
infrastructure pose a significant risk to public safety and property.
The likely combination of large numbers of recreation vessels,
airplanes traveling at high speeds and performing aerial acrobatics,
and large numbers of spectators in close proximity on the water could
result in serious injuries or fatalities. Establishing a safety zone
around the location of the race course will help ensure the safety of
persons and property at these events and help minimize the associated
risks. Likewise, the Windsor Port Authority intends to restrict vessel
movement on the Canadian side of the Detroit River. The exclusionary
area on the Canadian side will be aligned with the east and west
borders of the U.S. safety zone and will extend to the shoreline along
Windsor, ON.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
This proposed rule is intended to ensure safety of the public and
vessels during the setup, course familiarization, time trials, and race
in conjunction with the Red Bull Air Race. The air race and associated
set-up and removal will occur between 9 a.m., June 11, 2009 and 6:30
p.m., June 14, 2009. The safety zone will be enforced daily from 9 a.m.
to 6:30 p.m., June 11th through 14th, 2009. Specifically, on June 11-
12, 2009, the river closure will be enforced as needed and therefore
will be intermittent. On June 13, 2009, the river closure will total no
more than 5 hours between the hours of 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. On June 14,
2009, the river closure will total no more than 6 hours between the
hours of 9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The Coast Guard expects to have additional
information from the event organizer before publication of the final
rule, and expects to provide more specific information in the final
rule regarding hours of enforcement for each day.
The safety zone will encompass all navigable waters of the United
States on the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound by a line extending
from a point on land southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, northeast along the Detroit shoreline
to a point on land at position 42[deg]20.0' N; 083[deg]1.2' W,
southeast to the international border with Canada at position
42[deg]19.8' N 083[deg]1.0' W, southwest along the international border
to position 42[deg]19.2' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, and northwest to the point
of origin at position 42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W. (DATUM: NAD 83).
The Captain of the Port will cause notice of enforcement of the safety
zone established by this section to be made by all appropriate means to
the affected segments of the public. Such means of notification will
include, but are not limited to, Broadcast Notice to Mariners and Local
Notice to Mariners. The Captain of the Port will issue a broadcast
Notice to Mariners notifying the public when enforcement of the safety
zone is terminated.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
[[Page 17629]]
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects minimal adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the above portion of the Detroit River between 9 a.m. and
6 p.m. on June 11, through June 14, 2009.
The proposed safety zone will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following
reasons: This rule will be in effect for approximately six hours each
day of the race. Additionally, small entities such as passenger
vessels, have been involved in the planning stages for this event and
have had ample time to make alternate arrangements with regards to
mooring positions and business operations during the hours this safety
zone will be in place. Furthermore, local sailing and yacht clubs will
be notified prior to the event, by Coast Guard Station Belle Isle, with
information on what to expect during the event with the intention of
minimizing interruptions in their normal business practices. In the
event that this temporary safety zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the Captain of the Port Detroit to
transit through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to
the public via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect. Additionally, the COTP will suspend enforcement of the safety
zone if the event, for which the zone is established, ends earlier than
the expected time.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention
Department, Sector Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9580, e-
mail Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications
[[Page 17630]]
of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management systems practices) that are
developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone. Based on our
preliminary determination, there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. Because this
event establishes a safety zone, paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction
applies.
We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703 and
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6,
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Section 165.T09-0089 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0089 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit River,
Detroit, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
U.S. waters of the Detroit River, Detroit, MI, bound by a line
extending from a point on land southwest of Joe Louis Arena at position
42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, northeast along the Detroit shoreline
to a point on land at position 42[deg]20.0' N; 083[deg]1.2' W,
southeast to the international boarder with Canada at position
42[deg]19.8' N 083[deg]1.0' W, southwest along the international border
to position 42[deg]19.2' N; 083[deg]3.3' W, and northwest to the point
of origin at position 42[deg]19.4' N; 083[deg]3.3' W. (DATUM: NAD 83).
(b) Enforcement Period. The safety zone will be enforced daily from
9 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on June 11, 2009 through June 14, 2009.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so.
(5) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port or his on-scene representative.
Dated: March 26, 2009.
J.D. Jenkins,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. E9-8759 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P