Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals (RFGP): Congressionally Mandated-One-Time Grants Program for Academic Programs- Competition A, 17726-17734 [E9-8642]
Download as PDF
17726
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
deployment and Operational Tracker
(SPOT) system. Recipients of federal
assistance awards shall register in SPOT
before deployment, or if already in the
designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the
assistance award, and maintain current
data in SPOT. Information on how to
register in SPOT will be available from
your Grants Officer or Grants Officer
Representative during the final
negotiation and approval stages in the
federal assistance awards process.
Recipients of federal assistance awards
are advised that adherence to this policy
and procedure will be a requirement of
all final federal assistance awards issued
by ECA.
Recipient performance may require
the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such
private security contractors (PSCs) are
required, grantees are required to ensure
they adhere to Chief of Mission (COM)
policies and procedures regarding the
operation, oversight, and accountability
of PSCs.
VI.1c. Unsuccessful applicants will
receive notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please refer to the following Web sites
for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
1. A final project and financial report
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
2. A concise, one-page final project
report summarizing project outcomes no
more than 90 days after the expiration
of the award. This one-page report will
be transmitted to OMB, and be made
available to the public via OMB’s
USAspending.gov Web site—as part of
ECA’s Federal Funding Accountability
and Transparency Act (FFATA)
reporting requirements.
3. A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all project
reports.
4. Interim project and financial
reports after each project phase, as
required in the Bureau grant agreement.
Award Recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular project reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Project Data Requirements
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
project participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
1. Name, address, contact information
and biographic sketch of all persons
who travel internationally on funds
provided by the grant or who benefit
from the grant funding but do not travel.
2. Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, please contact: Curt
Huff, Professional Programs, Tel: (202)
453–8159; E-mail: HuffCE@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C–
09–One-time-Comp.B.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 8, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E9–8650 Filed 4–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6578]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals (RFGP): Congressionally
Mandated—One-Time Grants Program
for Academic Programs—
Competition A
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A–09–One-time-Comp. A
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 14, 2009.
Executive Summary: This competition
is one of two competitions that the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is conducting as directed in the
FY–2009 Omnibus Appropriation (Pub.
L. 111–8) under Division H of the
Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, under ‘‘Educational
and Cultural Exchange Programs’’ in
support of a $6 million ‘‘competitive
one-time grants program.’’ All
applications must be submitted by,
public or private non-profit
organizations, meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). Total
funding for this ‘‘one-time grants
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
program’’ is $6 million. $2.1 million
will be dedicated to this competition,
(Competition A—Academic Programs
One-time Grants Program—reference
number ECA/A–09–One-time-Comp. A),
and $3.9 million will be dedicated to
and announced simultaneously in a
separate RFGP (Competition B—
Professional, Cultural and Youth Onetime Grants Program– reference number
ECA/PE/C–09–One-time-Comp. B).
Please note: The Bureau reserves the
right to reallocate funds it has initially
allocated to each of these two
competitions, based upon factors such
as the number of applications received
and responsiveness to the review
criteria outlined in each of the
solicitations.
Applicants may only submit one
proposal (total) to the one-time grants
program. Applicants may submit either
one proposal for the Academic Programs
competition or one proposal for the
professional program competition, as
referenced above. In addition,
applicants under this competition (ECA/
A–09–One-time-Comp. A) may only
apply to administer one of the listed
activities (total): (1) Undergraduate
Intensive English Language Program, (2)
Capacity Building for Undergraduate or
Graduate Study Abroad, or (3) Study of
the United States Institutes for Foreign
Undergraduate Students. If multiple
proposals are received from the same
applicant, all submissions will be
declared technically ineligible and will
be given no further consideration in the
review process. Eligible applicants are
strongly encouraged to read both RFGPs
thoroughly, prior to developing and
submitting proposals, to ensure that
proposed activities are appropriate and
responsive to the goals, objectives and
criteria outlined in each of the
solicitations.
As further directed by the Congress,
‘‘The program shall be only for the
actual exchange of people and should
benefit a population that is not being
addressed through existing authorized
exchanges.’’
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs announces a
competition for grants that support
international exchanges in order to
increase mutual understanding and
build relationships, through individuals
and organizations, between the people
of the United States and their
counterparts in other countries. The
Bureau welcomes proposals from
organizations that have not had a
previous grant from the Bureau as well
as from those that have; see eligibility
information below and in section III.
Organizations that received grant
funding under the FY–2008 Competitive
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
One-time Grants Program (Reference
numbers: ECA/A–08–One-time-Comp. A
or ECA/PE/C/–08–One-time-Comp. B)
are not eligible to apply for this FY–
2009 One-time Program.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries
* * * ; to strengthen the ties which
unite us with other nations by
demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Background
The FY–2009 Omnibus Appropriation
(Pub. L. 111–8) under Division H of the
Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, under ‘‘Educational
and Cultural Exchange Programs’’
provides $6 million for a ‘‘competitive
one-time grants program. Grants shall
address issues of mutual interest to the
United States and other countries,
consistent with the program criteria
established in Public Law 110–161.
Programs shall support the actual
exchange of people and should benefit
a population that is not being addressed
through existing authorized exchanges.’’
ECA anticipates awarding
approximately 10 grants under this
Competition A—One-time Grants
Program for Academic Programs.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2009.
Approximate Total Funding: $2.1
Million.
Approximate Number of Awards: 10.
Approximate Average Award:
$300,000.
Floor of Award Range: Depending
upon an organization’s length of
experience in conducting international
exchanges, grants could be awarded for
less than $60,000. See section III.3.a.,
below.
Ceiling of Award Range: $700,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17727
Anticipated Award Date: August
2009.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
Approximately 24 months after the start
date of the grant.
Additional Information: As stipulated
in the legislation, this is a competitive
one-time grants program.
The Office of Academic Programs will
accept proposals for the following onetime special initiatives. For each of the
activities listed below, Bureau emphasis
is given to engaging participants from
select geographic regions. Further
details on specific program
responsibilities are included in the
Program Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) document for
this initiative. Interested organizations
should read the entire Federal Register
announcement for all information prior
to preparing proposals. Please refer to
the solicitation package for further
instructions.
1. Undergraduate Intensive English
Language Program: The U.S.
Department of State is dedicated to
increasing its engagement with
undergraduate students worldwide who
demonstrate the potential to become
student leaders and who represent
indigenous, disadvantaged or
underrepresented communities. ECA
offers exchange programs for
undergraduates from underserved
sectors of society that increase
participants’ knowledge and
understanding of the United States. The
Undergraduate Intensive English
Program will enroll foreign
undergraduate students in eight-week
intensive English language courses at
colleges and universities in the United
States, and provide them with an
introduction to American institutions,
society and culture. ECA expects to
fund a total of approximately 60
students. Regions of emphasis: SubSaharan Africa, Latin America and the
Caribbean, and East Asia and the
Pacific.
Purpose: The Undergraduate Intensive
English Language Study Program will
provide promising first, second, and
third-year undergraduate students from
underserved sectors, who would not
otherwise qualify for U.S. exchange
opportunities based on English language
ability, an opportunity to increase their
English language skills through a
substantive U.S. exchange experience,
and thereby make them more
competitive to participate in other U.S.
government-sponsored exchanges or for
later graduate admission to U.S.
institutions.
Program Design: Programs should
have a duration of eight weeks. ECA
anticipates a total of approximately 60
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17728
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
participants, who may be divided into
several cohorts of students. For
planning purposes, interested
applicants should anticipate that
programs should be planned from MaySeptember 2010. Programs should
provide participants with intensive
English language training, including
English for Academic Purposes, as well
as the development of general reading,
writing, speaking and listening skills,
and the testing of those skills.
Student participants will be
undergraduates and will be recruited
and selected by the U.S. Embassy Public
Affairs Sections or Fulbright
Commissions in the students’ home
countries. ECA will approve
nominations and make final selection.
Participants will come from non-elite
backgrounds, from both rural and urban
sectors, and with little to no prior
experience in the United States or
elsewhere outside of their home
country. It is anticipated that the
selection of participants will reflect
each region’s geographic, institutional,
ethnic, and gender diversity. Most of the
students selected will have a basic
knowledge of the English language
through formal study. For applicants
representing a consortium of colleges or
universities, it is necessary to indicate
the lead institution and produce letters
of support from all institutions or
organizations that will carry out
activities as part of the consortia. In
identifying the participating host
institutions, the proposal should make
clear why these institutions have been
recommended, and how those
institutions will specifically meet the
purposes outlined above.
It is essential that participants be
placed in classes with students from a
variety of language backgrounds and not
only in courses that contain only
speakers of their native language.
Applicants should design a program
that will offer an academic residency
component of eight weeks, the central
element of which is an intensive English
language training course (English for
Academic Purposes), together with
other instructional elements that will
develop participants’ general reading,
writing, speaking and listening skills.
Provisions should also be made for
testing those skills.
The program should also provide
opportunities for participants to
routinely meet with U.S citizens from a
variety of backgrounds, to regularly
meet with their American peers, and to
speak to appropriate students and civic
groups about their experiences and life
in their home countries. Programs
should include a community service
component, in which the students
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
experience firsthand how not-for-profit
organizations and volunteerism play key
roles in American civil society.
A total of one grant will be awarded
for the administration of the Intensive
English Language Study Program.
Applicant organizations should include
in their proposals the pedagogical
rationale for their plan to administer a
program to students from multiple
regions (regions: Sub-Saharan Africa,
Latin America and the Caribbean, and
East Asia/Pacific). ECA reserves the
right to adjust the regional composition
of student cohorts according to Bureau
or program priorities. Participating
countries within regions will be
determined by ECA, in consultation
with Public Affairs Sections at U.S.
embassies abroad.
Proposals should demonstrate
regional expertise. International travel
will be arranged separately by ECA and
therefore should not be included in
budget requests (please see POGI for
details). Please see the POGI document
for detailed budget information. It is
anticipated that the total amount of
funding for administrative and program
costs will be approximately $560,000.
However, the total funding for this
project will be approximately $700,000.
ECA anticipates withholding
approximately $140,000 for the
purchase of participants’ airline tickets.
Number of Awards: 1.
Award Amount: $560,000.
Contact: Vincent Pickett,
PickettVS@state.gov, 202–453–8137.
2. Capacity Building for
Undergraduate or Graduate Study
Abroad:
Purpose: The project will encourage
the development of new undergraduate
and/or graduate study abroad programs.
Program Design: Awards will support
exploratory visits of U.S. faculty and/or
study abroad administrators from
accredited U.S. higher education
institutions, as well as a limited number
of U.S. student participants. Program
funds will not support any travel of
representatives or students from foreign
institutions to the United States.
Programs should focus on increasing
the capacity of foreign institutions to
host U.S. undergraduate and/or graduate
students interested in pursuing quality
academic work that forms an integral
part of their degree programs. The
Bureau especially welcomes
applications focusing on non-traditional
study abroad destinations and nontraditional fields of study, including
critical languages.
Regions of Emphasis: Sub-Saharan
Africa, South America, Central America,
Middle East, Asia.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Bureau anticipates funding
approximately seven projects at levels
not to exceed $100,000 with total
Bureau funding not to exceed $700,000.
Applicants that do not have four years
of experience would receive awards that
do not exceed $60,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 7.
Approximate Average Award: $100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $700,000.
Contact: Amy Forest;
ForestAL@state.gov; 202–453–8866.
3. Study of the United States Institutes
for Foreign Undergraduate Students:
The U.S. Department of State is
dedicated to increasing its engagement
with undergraduate students worldwide
who demonstrate the potential to
become leaders and who represent
indigenous, disadvantaged, or
underrepresented communities. ECA
offers exchange programs for
undergraduate students from
underserved sectors of society that
increase participants’ knowledge and
understanding of the United States. The
Bureau is seeking detailed proposals for
two different Study of the United States
Institutes for Foreign Undergraduate
Students under the topics of: (1) Energy
and the Environment and (2) Social
Entrepreneurship. Applicants should
demonstrate the expertise and regional
knowledge, if applicable, to provide
participants with a program that
provides them information and knowhow that they can implement when they
return home.
Purpose: The purpose of the Study of
the United States Institutes for Foreign
Undergraduate Students is to provide
outstanding first, second, and third-year
undergraduate students with intensive
and collaborative six-week academic
programs on current developments in
their respective fields of study, as well
as broad exposure to U.S. society. Each
program will include 20–24
undergraduates whose major course of
study or demonstrated interests are
appropriate for the thematic focus of the
institute.
Program Design: Each institute should
be a specially designed intensive
academic program that combines
seminars, discussions, readings,
debates, site visits, and educational
travel into a coherent whole. The
institutes must not simply replicate
existing or previous lectures,
workshops, or group activities designed
for American or other students.
Each institute should provide
academic study in the specific
discipline as well as the development of
practical skills. Sessions should include
lectures, group discussions, and
exercises, and should promote
leadership, team-building, and problem-
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
solving skills. In addition, these
institutes are intended to promote a
better understanding of the United
States and its people. Participants
should gain a deeper understanding of
the history and evolution of U.S.
society, culture, values, and institutions.
During each program, participants
should spend approximately four weeks
at the host institution for the academic
residency component, and
approximately two weeks on an
educational study tour, including two to
three days in Washington, DC, at the
conclusion of the institute. The
educational travel component should
directly complement the academic
program, and should allow participants
to observe varied aspects of American
life in cities and other sites of interest.
The program should provide
opportunities for participants to meet
American citizens from a variety of
backgrounds, to interact with their
American peers, and to speak to
appropriate student and civic groups
about their experiences and life in their
home countries. Schedules should
include a community service
component, comprised of three to four
volunteering sessions directly related to
the institute theme, in which the
students gain hands-on experience with
the key roles of not-for-profit
organizations and volunteerism in
American civil society.
U.S. Embassy Public Affairs Sections
or Fulbright Commissions in the
students’ home countries will recruit
and select the undergraduate student
participants based on academic merit
and leadership potential. Participants
will come from non-elite backgrounds,
from both rural and urban sectors, and
should have little or no prior experience
in the United States or elsewhere
outside their home country. It is
anticipated that the selection of
participants will reflect each region’s
geographic, institutional, ethnic, and
gender diversity.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Institute Themes
(1) Study of the United States Institute
on Energy and the Environment
Study of the United States Institute on
Energy and the Environment should
provide participants with historical
insight into the role that energy and
environmental policy has played in the
economic and political development of
the United States. The Institute should
examine various aspects of energy and
environmental management, from local
grassroots activism and civic initiatives,
to market-oriented approaches, to
Federal Government policies and
regulation. The Institute also should
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
explore international aspects of the
subject, including collaboration among
governments and the private sector,
joint ventures among countries, and
U.S. involvement in negotiated
international agreements. Topics may
include, (but are not limited to): The
development and transfer of new
technologies; the effects of U.S.
Government policies related to energy
conservation, investment, and
production on the economy and
environment; and the future
possibilities for green technology and
renewable energy to address global
climate change.
Participants will be drawn from
majors that include business and
management, public administration,
political science, and the natural
sciences. Regions of emphasis: Global.
(2) Study of the United States Institute
on Social Entrepreneurship
Study of the United States Institute on
Social Entrepreneurship should provide
participants with an overview of how to
employ business techniques and
entrepreneurial skills to address social
issues (i.e. community or economic
development, civil society development,
education, environment, healthcare,
youth employment, or cultural arts
programs). The institute should review
the development, history, challenges,
and successes of social entrepreneurs
and social enterprises, in the United
States and globally. Case studies and
local site visits should highlight the
different business skills and techniques
employed such as: Organizational
development and management; strategy
development; fundraising; grant writing;
financial management; marketing;
public relations; project management;
emerging markets and risk analysis;
corporate social responsibility; human
resource and volunteer management;
training; and sustainability issues. The
program should be comparative in
nature, explaining how the United
States may differ globally in terms of
government regulation, access to credit,
support networks, funding, primary and
tertiary education, and entrepreneurial
history.
Participants will be drawn from fields
that include business and management,
public administration, social science,
and non-profit management. Regions of
emphasis: Eurasia, Near East, South and
Central Asia, or sub-Saharan Africa.
The Bureau anticipates funding the
two institutes at levels not to exceed
$350,000 each with total Bureau
funding not to exceed $700,000.
Applicant organizations may propose to
administer both institutes utilizing
separate host institutions with sub-grant
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17729
agreements. However, applicant
institutions may not host more than one
undergraduate student leader institute.
Approximate Number of Awards: 2.
Approximate Average Award (1
institute): $350,000.
Ceiling of Award Range (2 institutes):
$700,000.
Contact: Brendan M. Walsh,
WalshBM@state.gov, 202–453–8532.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications must be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
Organizations listed in the FY–2009
Omnibus Appropriation (Pub. L. 111–8)
under Division H of the Department of
State, Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs Appropriations Act, under
‘‘Educational and Cultural Exchange
Programs’’ in support of a $6 million
‘‘competitive one-time grants program’’
are encouraged to apply.
In addition, organizations listed in the
Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriation Act, 2008 (Division J,
Pub. L. 110–161) under ‘‘Educational
and Cultural Exchange Programs—a
competitive one-time grants program’’
that did not receive funding under the
FY–2008 Competitive One-time Grants
Program are encouraged and/or eligible
to apply.
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal Government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17730
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
a. Grants awarded to eligible
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000. Therefore,
applicants should explain their
experience in conducting international
exchanges, and, if that experience is less
than four years, should limit their
proposed grant budgets to $60,000.
As directed by the Congress, ‘‘The
program shall be only for the actual
exchange of people and should benefit
a population that is not being addressed
through existing authorized exchanges.’’
b. Technical Eligibility: All proposals
must comply with the following:
—Eligible applicants may only submit
one proposal (total) for one of the two
competitions referenced in the
Executive Summary Section of this
document. If multiple proposals are
received from the same applicant, all
submissions will be declared
technically ineligible and will be
given no further consideration in the
review process. Applicants under this
competition (ECA/A–09-One-timeComp. A) may only apply to
administer one of the three listed
activities (total).
—Proposals requesting funding for
infrastructure development activities,
sometimes referred to as ‘‘bricks and
mortar support’’ are not eligible for
consideration under this competition
and will be declared technically
ineligible and will receive no further
consideration in the review process.
—The Bureau does not support
proposals limited to conferences or
seminars (i.e., one- to fourteen-day
programs with plenary sessions, main
speakers, panels, and an audience). It
will support conferences only when
they are a small part of a larger project
in duration that is receiving Bureau
funding from this competition.
—No funding is available exclusively to
send U.S. citizens to conferences or
conference type seminars overseas;
nor is funding available for bringing
foreign nationals to conferences or to
routine professional association
meetings in the United States.
—Organizations that received grant
funding under the FY–2008
Competitive One-time Grants Program
(Reference numbers: ECA/A–08-Onetime-Comp. A or ECA/PE/C/–08-Onetime-Comp. B) are not eligible to
apply for this FY–2009 one-time
program. In the event a proposal is
received from a FY–2008, One-time
grant recipient, the proposal will be
declared technically ineligible and
will receive no further consideration
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
in the review process. Please note: A
FY–2008, One-time grant recipient,
per above, is defined by the DUNS
number of the organization and by the
signature of the authorized
representative contained on
‘‘Application for Federal Assistance
Form’’ (SF–424) that was submitted
under the FY–2008 Competitive Onetime Grants Program.
Please refer to the Proposal
Submission Instruction (PSI) document
for additional requirements.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Office of Academic
Exchanges, ECA/A/E, Room 234, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, tel:
202–453–8137, fax: 202–453–8125,
PickettVS@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A–
09-One-time-Comp. A located at the top
of this announcement when making
your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer
Vincent Pickett, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A–
09-One-time-Comp. A located at the top
of this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm.
Please read all information before
downloading.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The original and seven copies of the
application should be sent per the
instructions under IV.3e. ‘‘Submission
Dates and Times section’’ below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF—424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Office of
Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs is the official program sponsor of
the exchange program covered by this
RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau
will be the ‘‘Responsible Officer’’ for the
program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of
the Exchange Visitor Program (J visa
program). Under the terms of 22 CFR
part 62, organizations receiving grants
under this RFGP will be third parties
‘‘cooperating with or assisting the
sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor’s
program.’’ The actions of grantee
program organizations shall be
‘‘imputed to the sponsor in evaluating
the sponsor’s compliance with’’ 22 CFR
part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects
that any organization receiving a grant
under this competition will render all
assistance necessary to enable the
Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and
proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantee program organizations and
program participants to all regulations
governing the J visa program status.
Therefore, proposals should explicitly
state in writing that the applicant is
prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting
all requirements governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62.
If your organization has experience as a
designated Exchange Visitor Program
Sponsor, the applicant should discuss
their record of compliance with 22 CFR
part 62 et seq., including the oversight
of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers,
screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival
information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of Academic Exchange
Programs of ECA will be responsible for
issuing DS–2019 forms to participants
in this program. A copy of the complete
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
regulations governing the
administration of Exchange Visitor (J)
programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United
States Department of State, Office of
Exchange Coordination and Designation
ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44, Room 734, 301
Fourth Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547; Telephone: (202) 203–5029;
FAX: (202) 453–8640.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other instrument plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17731
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable timeframe), the easier it
will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of impact):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17732
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) Travel. International and domestic
airfare; visas; transit costs; ground
transportation costs. Except in the case
of Undergraduate Intensive English
Language Program; please see POGI for
further information. Please note that all
air travel must be in compliance with
the Fly America Act. There is no charge
for J–1 visas for participants in Bureausponsored programs.
(2) Per Diem. For U.S.-based
programming, organizations should use
the published Federal per diem rates for
individual U.S. cities. Domestic per
diem rates may be accessed at: https://
www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/
contentView.do?contentId=17943&
contentType=GSA_BASIC.
(3) Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3F. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Thursday,
May 14, 2009.
Reference Number: ECA/A–09–Onetime-Comp. A.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.,
below rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
Applicants must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ and budget sections of the
proposal as well as any essential
attachments, in Microsoft Word and/or
Excel on a PC-formatted disk. As
appropriate, the Bureau will provide
these files electronically to Public
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Affairs Sections at the U.S. Embassies
for their review.
The original and eight copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
Ref.: ECA/A–09–One-time-Comp. A
Program Management, ECA/EX/PM,
Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.
above, rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800 -518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday—Friday, 7
a.m.—9 p.m. Eastern Time. E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the
difference between a submission receipt
and a submission validation. Applicants
will receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
Applicants must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal the
Executive Summary, Proposal Narrative,
and Budget sections of the proposal, as
well as any essential attachments, in
Microsoft Word and/or Excel on a PCformatted disk. The Bureau will provide
these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Sections at
the U.S. Embassies for their review.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
17733
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (grants) resides with the
Bureau’s Grants Officer.
survey questionnaire or other technique
plus description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project
objectives. Please see Section IV.3d.3. of
this announcement for more
information.
6. Cost-effectiveness and Cost
Sharing: The applicant should
demonstrate efficient use of Bureau
funds. The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
The proposal should maximize costsharing through other private sector
support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below.
1. Quality of the Program Idea and
Program Planning: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. The
proposal should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan. The
proposed program should be creative
and well developed, respond to the
design outlined in the solicitation, and
demonstrate originality. It should be
clearly and accurately written,
substantive, and with sufficient detail.
The program plan should adhere to the
program overview and guidelines
described above.
2. Ability to Achieve Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Proposals should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
3. Support of Diversity: The proposal
should demonstrate the recipient’s
commitment to promoting the
awareness and understanding of
diversity in participant selection and
exchange program design and content.
4. Institutional Capacity and Track
Record: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program goals. The proposal should
demonstrate an institutional record,
including solid programming and
responsible fiscal management. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance, including compliance
with all reporting requirements for past
Bureau grants.
5. Program Evaluation: The proposal
should include a plan to evaluate the
program’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The proposal should include a draft
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive a Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply for exchanges
involving the Palestinian Authority,
West Bank, and Gaza:
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VI. Award Administration Information
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
Amy Forest in the Office of Global Education
Programs (e-mail: ForestAL@state.gov; phone:
202–453–8866) for additional information.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations’’;
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17734
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions’’;
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’;
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations;
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments;
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
1. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
2. A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
3. A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
4. Interim program and financial
reports after each program phase, as
required in the Bureau grant agreement.
Award Recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information.)
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, please contact:
Undergraduate Intensive English
Language Program, Vincent Pickett,
Academic Programs, Tel: (202) 453–
8137; E-mail: PickettVS@state.gov.
Capacity Building for Undergraduate
or Graduate Study Abroad, Amy Forest,
Global Educational Programs, Tel: (202)
453–8137; E-mail: ForestAL@state.gov.
Study of the United States Institutes
for Foreign Undergraduate Students,
Brendan M. Walsh, Study of the United
States, Tel: (202) 453–8532; E-mail:
WalshBM@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A–09–
One-time-Comp. A.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: April 8, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E9–8642 Filed 4–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6580]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant
Proposals: International Visitor
Leadership Program Assistance
Awards
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/V–10–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.402.
Key Dates: October 1, 2009–
September 30, 2010 (pending
availability of funds).
Application Deadline: June 5, 2009.
Executive Summary: The Office of
International Visitors, Division of
Professional and Cultural Exchanges,
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA/PE/V), United States
Department of State (DoS) announces an
open competition for two assistance
awards to develop and implement
International Visitor Leadership
Programs (IVLP). The IVLP seeks to
increase mutual understanding between
the U.S. and foreign publics through
carefully designed professional
programs for approximately 4,500
foreign visitors per year from all regions
of the world. The two awards will fund
programming for a minimum of 251 and
a maximum of 712 International Visitors
(IVs). Subject to availability of funds,
Award A will fund: (1) Up to
approximately 593 visitors ($1,939,113),
of which approximately 75 visitors will
be funded, if required, through seasonal
administrative funding for one 7-month
and one 4-month program team
included in this total or (2) up to
approximately 712 visitors ($2,326,936),
of which 75 visitors will be funded, if
required, through seasonal
administrative funding for one 7-month
and one 4-month program team
included in this total. Award B will
fund: (1) Up to approximately 251
visitors ($684,657) or (2) up to
approximately 301 visitors ($821,588).
Applicant organizations must include
two separate proposed budgets at the
two different projected funding levels
described above for each award for
which they apply. For Award A, each of
the proposed budgets should also
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 72 (Thursday, April 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17726-17734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8642]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6578]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals (RFGP): Congressionally Mandated--One-Time Grants
Program for Academic Programs-- Competition A
Announcement Type: New Grant.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 14, 2009.
Executive Summary: This competition is one of two competitions that
the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is conducting as
directed in the FY-2009 Omnibus Appropriation (Pub. L. 111-8) under
Division H of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs Appropriations Act, under ``Educational and Cultural Exchange
Programs'' in support of a $6 million ``competitive one-time grants
program.'' All applications must be submitted by, public or private
non-profit organizations, meeting the provisions described in Internal
Revenue code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). Total funding for this ``one-
time grants
[[Page 17727]]
program'' is $6 million. $2.1 million will be dedicated to this
competition, (Competition A--Academic Programs One-time Grants
Program--reference number ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A), and $3.9 million
will be dedicated to and announced simultaneously in a separate RFGP
(Competition B--Professional, Cultural and Youth One-time Grants
Program- reference number ECA/PE/C-09-One-time-Comp. B). Please note:
The Bureau reserves the right to reallocate funds it has initially
allocated to each of these two competitions, based upon factors such as
the number of applications received and responsiveness to the review
criteria outlined in each of the solicitations.
Applicants may only submit one proposal (total) to the one-time
grants program. Applicants may submit either one proposal for the
Academic Programs competition or one proposal for the professional
program competition, as referenced above. In addition, applicants under
this competition (ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A) may only apply to
administer one of the listed activities (total): (1) Undergraduate
Intensive English Language Program, (2) Capacity Building for
Undergraduate or Graduate Study Abroad, or (3) Study of the United
States Institutes for Foreign Undergraduate Students. If multiple
proposals are received from the same applicant, all submissions will be
declared technically ineligible and will be given no further
consideration in the review process. Eligible applicants are strongly
encouraged to read both RFGPs thoroughly, prior to developing and
submitting proposals, to ensure that proposed activities are
appropriate and responsive to the goals, objectives and criteria
outlined in each of the solicitations.
As further directed by the Congress, ``The program shall be only
for the actual exchange of people and should benefit a population that
is not being addressed through existing authorized exchanges.''
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces a
competition for grants that support international exchanges in order to
increase mutual understanding and build relationships, through
individuals and organizations, between the people of the United States
and their counterparts in other countries. The Bureau welcomes
proposals from organizations that have not had a previous grant from
the Bureau as well as from those that have; see eligibility information
below and in section III.
Organizations that received grant funding under the FY-2008
Competitive One-time Grants Program (Reference numbers: ECA/A-08-One-
time-Comp. A or ECA/PE/C/-08-One-time-Comp. B) are not eligible to
apply for this FY-2009 One-time Program.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * * ; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Background
The FY-2009 Omnibus Appropriation (Pub. L. 111-8) under Division H
of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs
Appropriations Act, under ``Educational and Cultural Exchange
Programs'' provides $6 million for a ``competitive one-time grants
program. Grants shall address issues of mutual interest to the United
States and other countries, consistent with the program criteria
established in Public Law 110-161. Programs shall support the actual
exchange of people and should benefit a population that is not being
addressed through existing authorized exchanges.''
ECA anticipates awarding approximately 10 grants under this
Competition A--One-time Grants Program for Academic Programs.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Grant Agreement.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2009.
Approximate Total Funding: $2.1 Million.
Approximate Number of Awards: 10.
Approximate Average Award: $300,000.
Floor of Award Range: Depending upon an organization's length of
experience in conducting international exchanges, grants could be
awarded for less than $60,000. See section III.3.a., below.
Ceiling of Award Range: $700,000.
Anticipated Award Date: August 2009.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: Approximately 24 months after
the start date of the grant.
Additional Information: As stipulated in the legislation, this is a
competitive one-time grants program.
The Office of Academic Programs will accept proposals for the
following one-time special initiatives. For each of the activities
listed below, Bureau emphasis is given to engaging participants from
select geographic regions. Further details on specific program
responsibilities are included in the Program Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) document for this initiative. Interested
organizations should read the entire Federal Register announcement for
all information prior to preparing proposals. Please refer to the
solicitation package for further instructions.
1. Undergraduate Intensive English Language Program: The U.S.
Department of State is dedicated to increasing its engagement with
undergraduate students worldwide who demonstrate the potential to
become student leaders and who represent indigenous, disadvantaged or
underrepresented communities. ECA offers exchange programs for
undergraduates from underserved sectors of society that increase
participants' knowledge and understanding of the United States. The
Undergraduate Intensive English Program will enroll foreign
undergraduate students in eight-week intensive English language courses
at colleges and universities in the United States, and provide them
with an introduction to American institutions, society and culture. ECA
expects to fund a total of approximately 60 students. Regions of
emphasis: Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and East
Asia and the Pacific.
Purpose: The Undergraduate Intensive English Language Study Program
will provide promising first, second, and third-year undergraduate
students from underserved sectors, who would not otherwise qualify for
U.S. exchange opportunities based on English language ability, an
opportunity to increase their English language skills through a
substantive U.S. exchange experience, and thereby make them more
competitive to participate in other U.S. government-sponsored exchanges
or for later graduate admission to U.S. institutions.
Program Design: Programs should have a duration of eight weeks. ECA
anticipates a total of approximately 60
[[Page 17728]]
participants, who may be divided into several cohorts of students. For
planning purposes, interested applicants should anticipate that
programs should be planned from May-September 2010. Programs should
provide participants with intensive English language training,
including English for Academic Purposes, as well as the development of
general reading, writing, speaking and listening skills, and the
testing of those skills.
Student participants will be undergraduates and will be recruited
and selected by the U.S. Embassy Public Affairs Sections or Fulbright
Commissions in the students' home countries. ECA will approve
nominations and make final selection. Participants will come from non-
elite backgrounds, from both rural and urban sectors, and with little
to no prior experience in the United States or elsewhere outside of
their home country. It is anticipated that the selection of
participants will reflect each region's geographic, institutional,
ethnic, and gender diversity. Most of the students selected will have a
basic knowledge of the English language through formal study. For
applicants representing a consortium of colleges or universities, it is
necessary to indicate the lead institution and produce letters of
support from all institutions or organizations that will carry out
activities as part of the consortia. In identifying the participating
host institutions, the proposal should make clear why these
institutions have been recommended, and how those institutions will
specifically meet the purposes outlined above.
It is essential that participants be placed in classes with
students from a variety of language backgrounds and not only in courses
that contain only speakers of their native language. Applicants should
design a program that will offer an academic residency component of
eight weeks, the central element of which is an intensive English
language training course (English for Academic Purposes), together with
other instructional elements that will develop participants' general
reading, writing, speaking and listening skills. Provisions should also
be made for testing those skills.
The program should also provide opportunities for participants to
routinely meet with U.S citizens from a variety of backgrounds, to
regularly meet with their American peers, and to speak to appropriate
students and civic groups about their experiences and life in their
home countries. Programs should include a community service component,
in which the students experience firsthand how not-for-profit
organizations and volunteerism play key roles in American civil
society.
A total of one grant will be awarded for the administration of the
Intensive English Language Study Program. Applicant organizations
should include in their proposals the pedagogical rationale for their
plan to administer a program to students from multiple regions
(regions: Sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, and East
Asia/Pacific). ECA reserves the right to adjust the regional
composition of student cohorts according to Bureau or program
priorities. Participating countries within regions will be determined
by ECA, in consultation with Public Affairs Sections at U.S. embassies
abroad.
Proposals should demonstrate regional expertise. International
travel will be arranged separately by ECA and therefore should not be
included in budget requests (please see POGI for details). Please see
the POGI document for detailed budget information. It is anticipated
that the total amount of funding for administrative and program costs
will be approximately $560,000. However, the total funding for this
project will be approximately $700,000. ECA anticipates withholding
approximately $140,000 for the purchase of participants' airline
tickets.
Number of Awards: 1.
Award Amount: $560,000.
Contact: Vincent Pickett, PickettVS@state.gov, 202-453-8137.
2. Capacity Building for Undergraduate or Graduate Study Abroad:
Purpose: The project will encourage the development of new
undergraduate and/or graduate study abroad programs.
Program Design: Awards will support exploratory visits of U.S.
faculty and/or study abroad administrators from accredited U.S. higher
education institutions, as well as a limited number of U.S. student
participants. Program funds will not support any travel of
representatives or students from foreign institutions to the United
States.
Programs should focus on increasing the capacity of foreign
institutions to host U.S. undergraduate and/or graduate students
interested in pursuing quality academic work that forms an integral
part of their degree programs. The Bureau especially welcomes
applications focusing on non-traditional study abroad destinations and
non-traditional fields of study, including critical languages.
Regions of Emphasis: Sub-Saharan Africa, South America, Central
America, Middle East, Asia.
The Bureau anticipates funding approximately seven projects at
levels not to exceed $100,000 with total Bureau funding not to exceed
$700,000. Applicants that do not have four years of experience would
receive awards that do not exceed $60,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 7. Approximate Average Award:
$100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $700,000.
Contact: Amy Forest; ForestAL@state.gov; 202-453-8866.
3. Study of the United States Institutes for Foreign Undergraduate
Students: The U.S. Department of State is dedicated to increasing its
engagement with undergraduate students worldwide who demonstrate the
potential to become leaders and who represent indigenous,
disadvantaged, or underrepresented communities. ECA offers exchange
programs for undergraduate students from underserved sectors of society
that increase participants' knowledge and understanding of the United
States. The Bureau is seeking detailed proposals for two different
Study of the United States Institutes for Foreign Undergraduate
Students under the topics of: (1) Energy and the Environment and (2)
Social Entrepreneurship. Applicants should demonstrate the expertise
and regional knowledge, if applicable, to provide participants with a
program that provides them information and know-how that they can
implement when they return home.
Purpose: The purpose of the Study of the United States Institutes
for Foreign Undergraduate Students is to provide outstanding first,
second, and third-year undergraduate students with intensive and
collaborative six-week academic programs on current developments in
their respective fields of study, as well as broad exposure to U.S.
society. Each program will include 20-24 undergraduates whose major
course of study or demonstrated interests are appropriate for the
thematic focus of the institute.
Program Design: Each institute should be a specially designed
intensive academic program that combines seminars, discussions,
readings, debates, site visits, and educational travel into a coherent
whole. The institutes must not simply replicate existing or previous
lectures, workshops, or group activities designed for American or other
students.
Each institute should provide academic study in the specific
discipline as well as the development of practical skills. Sessions
should include lectures, group discussions, and exercises, and should
promote leadership, team-building, and problem-
[[Page 17729]]
solving skills. In addition, these institutes are intended to promote a
better understanding of the United States and its people. Participants
should gain a deeper understanding of the history and evolution of U.S.
society, culture, values, and institutions.
During each program, participants should spend approximately four
weeks at the host institution for the academic residency component, and
approximately two weeks on an educational study tour, including two to
three days in Washington, DC, at the conclusion of the institute. The
educational travel component should directly complement the academic
program, and should allow participants to observe varied aspects of
American life in cities and other sites of interest.
The program should provide opportunities for participants to meet
American citizens from a variety of backgrounds, to interact with their
American peers, and to speak to appropriate student and civic groups
about their experiences and life in their home countries. Schedules
should include a community service component, comprised of three to
four volunteering sessions directly related to the institute theme, in
which the students gain hands-on experience with the key roles of not-
for-profit organizations and volunteerism in American civil society.
U.S. Embassy Public Affairs Sections or Fulbright Commissions in
the students' home countries will recruit and select the undergraduate
student participants based on academic merit and leadership potential.
Participants will come from non-elite backgrounds, from both rural and
urban sectors, and should have little or no prior experience in the
United States or elsewhere outside their home country. It is
anticipated that the selection of participants will reflect each
region's geographic, institutional, ethnic, and gender diversity.
Institute Themes
(1) Study of the United States Institute on Energy and the Environment
Study of the United States Institute on Energy and the Environment
should provide participants with historical insight into the role that
energy and environmental policy has played in the economic and
political development of the United States. The Institute should
examine various aspects of energy and environmental management, from
local grassroots activism and civic initiatives, to market-oriented
approaches, to Federal Government policies and regulation. The
Institute also should explore international aspects of the subject,
including collaboration among governments and the private sector, joint
ventures among countries, and U.S. involvement in negotiated
international agreements. Topics may include, (but are not limited to):
The development and transfer of new technologies; the effects of U.S.
Government policies related to energy conservation, investment, and
production on the economy and environment; and the future possibilities
for green technology and renewable energy to address global climate
change.
Participants will be drawn from majors that include business and
management, public administration, political science, and the natural
sciences. Regions of emphasis: Global.
(2) Study of the United States Institute on Social Entrepreneurship
Study of the United States Institute on Social Entrepreneurship
should provide participants with an overview of how to employ business
techniques and entrepreneurial skills to address social issues (i.e.
community or economic development, civil society development,
education, environment, healthcare, youth employment, or cultural arts
programs). The institute should review the development, history,
challenges, and successes of social entrepreneurs and social
enterprises, in the United States and globally. Case studies and local
site visits should highlight the different business skills and
techniques employed such as: Organizational development and management;
strategy development; fundraising; grant writing; financial management;
marketing; public relations; project management; emerging markets and
risk analysis; corporate social responsibility; human resource and
volunteer management; training; and sustainability issues. The program
should be comparative in nature, explaining how the United States may
differ globally in terms of government regulation, access to credit,
support networks, funding, primary and tertiary education, and
entrepreneurial history.
Participants will be drawn from fields that include business and
management, public administration, social science, and non-profit
management. Regions of emphasis: Eurasia, Near East, South and Central
Asia, or sub-Saharan Africa.
The Bureau anticipates funding the two institutes at levels not to
exceed $350,000 each with total Bureau funding not to exceed $700,000.
Applicant organizations may propose to administer both institutes
utilizing separate host institutions with sub-grant agreements.
However, applicant institutions may not host more than one
undergraduate student leader institute.
Approximate Number of Awards: 2.
Approximate Average Award (1 institute): $350,000.
Ceiling of Award Range (2 institutes): $700,000.
Contact: Brendan M. Walsh, WalshBM@state.gov, 202-453-8532.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications must be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
Organizations listed in the FY-2009 Omnibus Appropriation (Pub. L.
111-8) under Division H of the Department of State, Foreign Operations,
and Related Programs Appropriations Act, under ``Educational and
Cultural Exchange Programs'' in support of a $6 million ``competitive
one-time grants program'' are encouraged to apply.
In addition, organizations listed in the Department of State,
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriation Act, 2008
(Division J, Pub. L. 110-161) under ``Educational and Cultural Exchange
Programs--a competitive one-time grants program'' that did not receive
funding under the FY-2008 Competitive One-time Grants Program are
encouraged and/or eligible to apply.
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal Government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
[[Page 17730]]
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
a. Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four
years of experience in conducting international exchange programs will
be limited to $60,000. Therefore, applicants should explain their
experience in conducting international exchanges, and, if that
experience is less than four years, should limit their proposed grant
budgets to $60,000.
As directed by the Congress, ``The program shall be only for the
actual exchange of people and should benefit a population that is not
being addressed through existing authorized exchanges.''
b. Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the
following:
--Eligible applicants may only submit one proposal (total) for one of
the two competitions referenced in the Executive Summary Section of
this document. If multiple proposals are received from the same
applicant, all submissions will be declared technically ineligible and
will be given no further consideration in the review process.
Applicants under this competition (ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A) may only
apply to administer one of the three listed activities (total).
--Proposals requesting funding for infrastructure development
activities, sometimes referred to as ``bricks and mortar support'' are
not eligible for consideration under this competition and will be
declared technically ineligible and will receive no further
consideration in the review process.
--The Bureau does not support proposals limited to conferences or
seminars (i.e., one- to fourteen-day programs with plenary sessions,
main speakers, panels, and an audience). It will support conferences
only when they are a small part of a larger project in duration that is
receiving Bureau funding from this competition.
--No funding is available exclusively to send U.S. citizens to
conferences or conference type seminars overseas; nor is funding
available for bringing foreign nationals to conferences or to routine
professional association meetings in the United States.
--Organizations that received grant funding under the FY-2008
Competitive One-time Grants Program (Reference numbers: ECA/A-08-One-
time-Comp. A or ECA/PE/C/-08-One-time-Comp. B) are not eligible to
apply for this FY-2009 one-time program. In the event a proposal is
received from a FY-2008, One-time grant recipient, the proposal will be
declared technically ineligible and will receive no further
consideration in the review process. Please note: A FY-2008, One-time
grant recipient, per above, is defined by the DUNS number of the
organization and by the signature of the authorized representative
contained on ``Application for Federal Assistance Form'' (SF-424) that
was submitted under the FY-2008 Competitive One-time Grants Program.
Please refer to the Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI) document
for additional requirements.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1. Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of Academic Exchanges, ECA/A/E, Room 234,
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, tel: 202-453-8137, fax: 202-453-8125, PickettVS@state.gov to
request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A located at the top of this
announcement when making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer Vincent Pickett, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A located at the top
of this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The original and seven copies of the application should be
sent per the instructions under IV.3e. ``Submission Dates and Times
section'' below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF--424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one- page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in
[[Page 17731]]
the past three years, or if your organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years, you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI
document. Failure to do so will cause your proposal to be declared
technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Office of Academic Exchange Programs of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs is the official program sponsor of the exchange
program covered by this RFGP, and an employee of the Bureau will be the
``Responsible Officer'' for the program under the terms of 22 CFR part
62, which covers the administration of the Exchange Visitor Program (J
visa program). Under the terms of 22 CFR part 62, organizations
receiving grants under this RFGP will be third parties ``cooperating
with or assisting the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's
program.'' The actions of grantee program organizations shall be
``imputed to the sponsor in evaluating the sponsor's compliance with''
22 CFR part 62. Therefore, the Bureau expects that any organization
receiving a grant under this competition will render all assistance
necessary to enable the Bureau to fully comply with 22 CFR part 62 et
seq.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the secure and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by grantee program
organizations and program participants to all regulations governing the
J visa program status. Therefore, proposals should explicitly state in
writing that the applicant is prepared to assist the Bureau in meeting
all requirements governing the administration of Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62. If your organization has
experience as a designated Exchange Visitor Program Sponsor, the
applicant should discuss their record of compliance with 22 CFR part 62
et seq., including the oversight of their Responsible Officers and
Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program
participants, provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and
security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of Academic Exchange Programs of ECA will be responsible
for issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program. A copy of
the complete regulations governing the administration of Exchange
Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or
from: United States Department of State, Office of Exchange
Coordination and Designation ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734, 301 Fourth
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547; Telephone: (202) 203-5029; FAX:
(202) 453-8640.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
instrument plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable timeframe), the easier it will be to conduct the
evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link to
the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of impact):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
[[Page 17732]]
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) Travel. International and domestic airfare; visas; transit
costs; ground transportation costs. Except in the case of Undergraduate
Intensive English Language Program; please see POGI for further
information. Please note that all air travel must be in compliance with
the Fly America Act. There is no charge for J-1 visas for participants
in Bureau-sponsored programs.
(2) Per Diem. For U.S.-based programming, organizations should use
the published Federal per diem rates for individual U.S. cities.
Domestic per diem rates may be accessed at: https://www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/contentView.do?contentId=17943&contentType=GSA_BASIC.
(3) Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3F. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009.
Reference Number: ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways: 1. In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1., below rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
Applicants must also submit the ``Executive Summary'' and
``Proposal Narrative'' and budget sections of the proposal as well as
any essential attachments, in Microsoft Word and/or Excel on a PC-
formatted disk. As appropriate, the Bureau will provide these files
electronically to Public Affairs Sections at the U.S. Embassies for
their review.
The original and eight copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: Ref.: ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A Program Management, ECA/
EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1. above, rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
[[Page 17733]]
that all potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web
site, well in advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov
system. ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support. Contact Center Phone: 800 -
518-4726. Business Hours: Monday--Friday, 7 a.m.--9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
Applicants must also submit the ``Executive Summary'' and
``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the proposal the Executive Summary,
Proposal Narrative, and Budget sections of the proposal, as well as any
essential attachments, in Microsoft Word and/or Excel on a PC-formatted
disk. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Sections at the U.S. Embassies for their
review.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (grants) resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below.
1. Quality of the Program Idea and Program Planning: Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. The proposal should
clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's
objectives and plan. The proposed program should be creative and well
developed, respond to the design outlined in the solicitation, and
demonstrate originality. It should be clearly and accurately written,
substantive, and with sufficient detail. The program plan should adhere
to the program overview and guidelines described above.
2. Ability to Achieve Program Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Support of Diversity: The proposal should demonstrate the
recipient's commitment to promoting the awareness and understanding of
diversity in participant selection and exchange program design and
content.
4. Institutional Capacity and Track Record: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve
the program goals. The proposal should demonstrate an institutional
record, including solid programming and responsible fiscal management.
The Bureau will consider the past performance, including compliance
with all reporting requirements for past Bureau grants.
5. Program Evaluation: The proposal should include a plan to
evaluate the program's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. The proposal should include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. Please see Section
IV.3d.3. of this announcement for more information.
6. Cost-effectiveness and Cost Sharing: The applicant should
demonstrate efficient use of Bureau funds. The overhead and
administrative components of the proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. The proposal should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive a Federal
Assistance Award (FAA) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply for exchanges
involving the Palestinian Authority, West Bank, and Gaza:
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact Amy
Forest in the Office of Global Education Programs (e-mail:
ForestAL@state.gov; phone: 202-453-8866) for additional information.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations'';
[[Page 17734]]
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions'';
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments'';
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations;
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants-
in-Aid to State and Local Governments;
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and Non-
profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following reports:
1. A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award.
2. A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
3. A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
4. Interim program and financial reports after each program phase,
as required in the Bureau grant agreement.
Award Recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.)
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants will
be required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include
the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, please contact:
Undergraduate Intensive English Language Program, Vincent Pickett,
Academic Programs, Tel: (202) 453-8137; E-mail: PickettVS@state.gov.
Capacity Building for Undergraduate or Graduate Study Abroad, Amy
Forest, Global Educational Programs, Tel: (202) 453-8137; E-mail:
ForestAL@state.gov.
Study of the United States Institutes for Foreign Undergraduate
Students, Brendan M. Walsh, Study of the United States, Tel: (202) 453-
8532; E-mail: WalshBM@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A-09-One-time-Comp. A.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
Dated: April 8, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-8642 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P