Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant Proposals: International Visitor Leadership Program Assistance Awards, 17734-17741 [E9-8640]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17734
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions’’;
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’;
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Agreements with Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Nonprofit Organizations;
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments;
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one copy of the following
reports:
1. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
2. A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
3. A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
4. Interim program and financial
reports after each program phase, as
required in the Bureau grant agreement.
Award Recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information.)
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VI.4. Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, please contact:
Undergraduate Intensive English
Language Program, Vincent Pickett,
Academic Programs, Tel: (202) 453–
8137; E-mail: PickettVS@state.gov.
Capacity Building for Undergraduate
or Graduate Study Abroad, Amy Forest,
Global Educational Programs, Tel: (202)
453–8137; E-mail: ForestAL@state.gov.
Study of the United States Institutes
for Foreign Undergraduate Students,
Brendan M. Walsh, Study of the United
States, Tel: (202) 453–8532; E-mail:
WalshBM@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A–09–
One-time-Comp. A.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00103
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: April 8, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E9–8642 Filed 4–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6580]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA); Request for Grant
Proposals: International Visitor
Leadership Program Assistance
Awards
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/V–10–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 19.402.
Key Dates: October 1, 2009–
September 30, 2010 (pending
availability of funds).
Application Deadline: June 5, 2009.
Executive Summary: The Office of
International Visitors, Division of
Professional and Cultural Exchanges,
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA/PE/V), United States
Department of State (DoS) announces an
open competition for two assistance
awards to develop and implement
International Visitor Leadership
Programs (IVLP). The IVLP seeks to
increase mutual understanding between
the U.S. and foreign publics through
carefully designed professional
programs for approximately 4,500
foreign visitors per year from all regions
of the world. The two awards will fund
programming for a minimum of 251 and
a maximum of 712 International Visitors
(IVs). Subject to availability of funds,
Award A will fund: (1) Up to
approximately 593 visitors ($1,939,113),
of which approximately 75 visitors will
be funded, if required, through seasonal
administrative funding for one 7-month
and one 4-month program team
included in this total or (2) up to
approximately 712 visitors ($2,326,936),
of which 75 visitors will be funded, if
required, through seasonal
administrative funding for one 7-month
and one 4-month program team
included in this total. Award B will
fund: (1) Up to approximately 251
visitors ($684,657) or (2) up to
approximately 301 visitors ($821,588).
Applicant organizations must include
two separate proposed budgets at the
two different projected funding levels
described above for each award for
which they apply. For Award A, each of
the proposed budgets should also
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
include a separate budget spreadsheet
for the one 7-month and one 4-month
supplemental program team described
above. Applicant organizations may bid
on one or both awards. Pending
availability of funds, one assistance
award will be made for each category
described above. If an organization is
interested in bidding on more than one
award, a separate proposal and budget
is required for each award. See Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) for definitions of programrelated terminology.
The intent of this announcement is to
provide the opportunity for
organizations to develop and implement
a variety of programs for International
Visitors from multiple regions of the
world. Please refer to the POGI for a
breakdown of regions. The award
recipients will function as national
program agencies (NPAs) and will work
closely with Department of State (DoS)
Bureau staff, who will guide them
through programmatic, procedural, and
budgetary issues for the full range of IVL
programs. (Hereafter, the terms ‘‘award
recipient’’ and ‘‘national program
agency’’ will be used interchangeably to
refer to the grantee organization[s].)
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: Program Information.
Overview: The International Visitor
Leadership Program seeks to increase
mutual understanding between the U.S.
and foreign publics through carefully
designed professional programs. IVL
programs support U.S. foreign policy
objectives. Participants are current or
potential foreign leaders in government,
politics, media, education, science,
labor relations, non-government
organizations (NGOs), the arts, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
other key fields. They are selected by
officers of U.S. embassies overseas and
are approved by the DoS staff in
Washington, DC. Since the program’s
inception in 1940, there have been over
140,000 distinguished participants in
the program. Over 290 program alumni
subsequently became heads of state or
government in their home countries. All
IVL programs must maintain a nonpartisan character.
The Bureau seeks proposals from
nonprofit organizations for development
and implementation of professional
programs for Bureau-sponsored
International Visitors to the U.S. Once
the awards are made, separate proposals
will be required for each group project
[Single Country (SCP), Sub-Regional
(SRP), Regional (RP), and MultiRegional (MRP)] as well as less formal
proposals for Individual and Individuals
Traveling Together (ITT) and Voluntary
Visitors (Volvis) programs. Each
program will be focused on a
substantive theme. Some typical IVL
program themes are: (1) U.S. foreign
policy; (2) U.S. government and
political system; (3) economic
development; (4) education; (5) media;
(6) interfaith dialogue; (7) freedom of
information; (8) NGO management; (9)
women’s issues; (10) tolerance and
diversity; (11) counterterrorism; (12)
democracy and human rights; (13) rule
of law; (14) international crime; and (15)
environmental issues. IVL programs
must conform to all Bureau
requirements and guidelines. Please
refer to the Program Objectives, Goals,
and Implementation (POGI) document
for a more detailed description of each
type of IVL program.
Guidelines: Goals and objectives for
each specific IVL program will be
shared with the award recipients at an
appropriate time following the
announcement of the assistance awards.
DoS will provide close coordination and
guidance throughout the duration of the
awards. Award recipients will consult
closely with the responsible ECA/PE/V
program officer throughout the
development, implementation, and
evaluation of each IVL program.
Prospective program agencies should
demonstrate the potential to develop the
following types of programs.
1. Programs must contain substantive
meetings that focus on foreign policy
goals and program objectives and are
presented by experts. Meetings, site
visits, and other program activities
should promote dialogue between
participants and their U.S. professional
counterparts. Programs must be
balanced to show different sides of an
issue.
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17735
2. Most programs will be three weeks
long and will begin in Washington, DC,
with an orientation and overview of the
issues and a central examination of
Federal policies regarding these issues.
Well-paced program itineraries usually
include visits to four or five
communities. Program itineraries
ideally include urban and rural small
communities in diverse geographical
and cultural regions of the U.S., as
appropriate to the program theme.
3. Programs should provide
opportunities for participants to
experience the diversity of American
society and culture. Participants in RPs
or MRPs are divided into smaller subgroups for simultaneous visits to
different communities, with subsequent
opportunities to share their experiences
with the full group once it is reunited.
4. Programs should provide
opportunities for the participants to
share a meal or similar experience
(home hospitality) in the homes of
Americans of diverse occupational, age,
gender, and ethnic groups. Some
individual and group programs might
include an opportunity for an overnight
stay (home stay) in an American home.
5. Programs should provide
opportunities for participants to address
student, civic and professional groups
in relaxed and informal settings.
6. Participants should have
appropriate opportunities for site visits
and hands-on experiences that are
relevant to program themes. The award
recipients may propose professional
‘‘shadowing’’ experiences with U.S.
professional colleagues for some
programs (a typical shadowing
experience means spending a half- or
full-workday with a professional
counterpart.)
7. Programs should also allow time for
participants to reflect on their
experiences and, in group programs, to
share observations with program
colleagues. Participants should have
opportunities to visit cultural and
tourist sites.
8. The award recipients must make
arrangements for community visits
through affiliates of the National
Council for International Visitors
(NCIV). In cities where there is no such
council, the award recipients will
arrange for coordination of local
programs.
Qualifications
1. Proposals must demonstrate a
minimum of four years of successful
experience in coordinating international
exchanges.
2. Proposals must demonstrate the
ability to develop and administer IVL
programs.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17736
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
3. Proposals must demonstrate an
applicant’s broad knowledge of
international relations and U.S. foreign
policy issues.
4. Proposals must demonstrate an
applicant’s broad knowledge of the
United States and U.S. domestic issues.
5. Award recipients must have a
Washington, DC presence. Applicants
who do not currently have a
Washington, DC presence must include
a detailed plan in their proposal for
establishing such a presence by October
1, 2009. The costs related to establishing
such a presence must be borne by the
award recipient. No such costs may be
included in the budget submission in
this proposal. The award recipient must
have e-mail capability, access to Internet
resources, and the ability to exchange
data electronically with all partners
involved in the International Visitor
Leadership Program.
6. Proposals must demonstrate that an
applicant has an established resource
base of programming contacts and the
ability to keep this resource base
continuously updated. This resource
base should include speakers, thematic
specialists, or practitioners in a wide
range of professional fields in both the
private and public sectors.
7. All proposals must demonstrate
sound financial management.
8. All proposals must contain a sound
management plan to carry out the
volume of work outlined in the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
guidelines (POGI). This plan should
include an appropriate staffing pattern
and a work plan/timeframe.
9. Applicant organizations must
include two separate proposed budgets
at the two different projected funding
levels for each award for which they
apply.
10. Proposals must describe capacity
to employ additional staff during
particularly busy months of the IVLP
cycle and to assume additional projects,
if requested. For Award A, each of the
proposed budgets should also include a
separate budget spreadsheet for the one
7-month and one 4-month supplemental
program team described above.
11. Applicants must include in their
proposal narrative a discussion of
‘‘lessons learned’’ from past exchange
coordination experiences, and how
these will be applied in implementing
the International Visitor Leadership
Program.
12. Award recipients must have the
capability to utilize the world wide Web
for the electronic retrieval of program
data from the Department of State’s
IVLP Web site. The award recipient’s
office technology must be capable of
exchanging information with all
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
partners involved in the International
Visitor Leadership Program. The award
recipient must have the capability to
electronically communicate through
eNPA (Electronic National Program
Agency), the software application that
allows award recipients to share
information and data electronically
through the Department of State’s
Exchange Visitor Database (EVDB-e) and
with the Councils for International
Visitors (CIVs), as well as to produce a
national program book and other
supporting documents (e.g.,
appointment requests and
confirmations, participant welcome
letters, and mailing labels) generated
directly into Microsoft Word.
13. Applicants must include as a
separate attachment under TAB G of
their proposals the following:
a. Samples of at least two schedules
for international exchange or training
programs that they have coordinated
within the past four years that they are
particularly proud of and that they feel
demonstrate their organization’s
competence and abilities to conduct the
activities outlined in the RFGP;
b. Samples of orientation and NPA
self-evaluation materials used in past
international exchange or training
programs.
Requirements for Past Performance
References
Instead of Letters of Endorsement,
DoS will use past performance as an
indicator of an applicant’s ability to
successfully perform the work. TAB E of
the proposal must contain between
three and five references who may be
called upon to discuss recently
completed or ongoing work performed
for professional exchange programs
(which may include the IVL Program).
The reference must contain the
information outlined below. Please note
that the requirements for submission of
past performance information also apply
to all proposed sub-recipients when the
total estimated cost of the sub-award is
over $100,000.
At a minimum, the applicant must
provide the following information for
each reference:
• Name of the reference organization.
• Project name.
• Project description.
• Performance period of the contract/
grant.
• Amount of the contract/grant.
• Technical contact person and
telephone number for referenced
organization.
• Administrative contact person and
telephone number for referenced
organization.
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DoS may contact representatives from
the organizations cited in the examples
to obtain information on the applicant’s
past performance. DoS also may obtain
past performance information from
sources other than those identified by
the applicant.
Personnel: Applicants must include
complete and current resumes of the key
personnel who will be involved in the
program management, design, and
implementation of IVL programs. Each
resume is limited to two pages per
person.
Budget Guidelines
Applicants are required to submit a
comprehensive line-item administrative
budget in accordance with the
instructions in the Solicitation Package
(Proposal Submission Instructions.) The
submission must include a summary
budget and a detailed budget showing
all administrative costs. Proposed
staffing and costs associated with
staffing must be appropriate to the
requirements outlined in the RFGP and
in the Solicitation Package. Cost sharing
is encouraged and should be shown in
the budget presentation.
The Department of State is seeking
proposals from public and private
nonprofit organizations that are not
already in communication with DoS
regarding an FY–2010 assistance award
from ECA/PE/V. All applicants must
have a minimum of four years’
experience conducting international
exchanges, an ability to closely consult
with DoS staff throughout program
administration, and proven fiscal
management integrity. Please refer to
the Solicitation Package for complete
budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, as sponsor and
manager of the International Visitor
Leadership Program, plays a significant
role in the planning, implementation,
and evaluation of all types of
International Visitor Leadership
Programs and is responsible for all
communication with overseas missions.
The Bureau will provide close
coordination and guidance throughout
the duration of the awards. Award
recipients will consult closely with the
responsible ECA/PE/V program officer
throughout the development,
implementation, and evaluation of each
IVL program.
All liaison shall be with the
designated elements of the DoS relative
to the following responsibilities
incurred by the recipient under this
agreement:
A. Program Administration—Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
Office of International Visitors,
Community Resources Division, ECA/
PE/V/C.
B. Financial—Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Grants Division,
ECA–IIP/EX/G.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2010 (pending
availability of funds).
Approximate Total Funding:
$2,623,770 or $3,148,524.
Administrative funding only; program
funds provided as needed.
Number of Awards: Two.
Approximate Average Award:
$1,443,074.
Floor of Award Range: $684,657 (251
visitors).
Ceiling of Award Range: $2,326,936
(712 visitors).
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, October 1, 2009.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
September 30, 2010.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew these cooperative
agreements for five additional fiscal
years, before openly competing them
again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, award
recipients must maintain written
records to support all costs which are
claimed as its contribution, as well as
costs to be paid by the Federal
government. Such records are subject to
audit. The basis for determining the
value of cash and in-kind contributions
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a) Bureau cooperative agreement
guidelines require that organizations
with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding.
ECA anticipates awarding two
cooperative agreements of which the
minimum award is $684,657. Therefore,
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges are ineligible to apply under
this competition. Program costs will be
transferred directly to the award
recipient based upon International
Visitor workload, and should not be
included in the proposal. The Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
(b) Technical Eligibility: All proposals
must comply with the technical
eligibility requirements specified in the
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
and the Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) documents.
Failure to do so will result in proposals
being declared technically ineligible
and given no further consideration in
the review process.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
must be in accordance with OMB
Circular A–110, (Revised), Subpart
C.23—Cost Sharing and Matching. In
the event the recipient organization
does not provide the minimum amount
of cost sharing as stipulated in the
approved budget, ECA’s contribution
will be reduced in like proportion.
Note: Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the
RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an
Application Package
Please contact the Office of
International Visitors, Community
Relations Division (ECA/PE/V/C), Room
247, U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, telephone (202) 453–8624, fax
(202) 453–8631 number, or e-mail
JohnsonPA2@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/
V–10–01) located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from https://grants.gov. Please see
section IV.3f for further information.
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17737
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Patricia Johnson and
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number (ECA/PE/V–10–01) located at
the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a.
You are required to have a Dun and
Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number to apply for a
grant or cooperative agreement from the
U.S. Government. This number is a
nine-digit identification number which
uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and
there is no charge. To obtain a DUNS
number, access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b.
All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation
package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c.
You must have nonprofit status with
the IRS at the time of application. If
your organization is a private nonprofit
which has not received a grant or
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
17738
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
cooperative agreement from ECA in the
past three years, or if your organization
received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must
submit the necessary documentation to
verify nonprofit status as directed in the
PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared
technically ineligible.
IV.3d.
Please take into consideration the
following information when preparing
the proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to all regulations
governing the J Visa: The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Office of International Visitors
(ECA/PE/V) will be responsible for
issuing DS–2019 forms to participants
in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547. Telephone:
(202) 203–5029. FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106—113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Successful monitoring and
evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear objectives and outcomes at the
outset of a program. In support of the
Bureau’s evaluation goals, the Office of
International Visitors will administer a
post-program evaluation for
International Visitors upon conclusion
of Regional and Multi-Regional
programs.
In addition, applicants must monitor
and evaluate the program’s success,
both as activities unfold and at the end
of each program. (See Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document.) Proposal submissions
should include a monitoring and
evaluation plan that demonstrates: An
understanding of overall IVLP goals, as
well as the objectives of assigned
projects; the anticipated results and
outcomes, including specific changes in
International Visitors’ behavior,
knowledge, skills, and status resulting
from the program activities; and the link
between the outcomes and the original
project objectives.
Proposals should further demonstrate
how applicants will obtain an
understanding of the goals and
objectives of each assigned IVL program,
and how applicants will review and
analyze the outcomes and results upon
conclusion of each IVL program. For
regional and multi-regional programs,
participation at a final oral evaluation
session is expected and a final program
report is required. (See Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document.) Proposal
submissions should demonstrate how
award recipients will apply the
feedback provided by International
Visitors to strengthen the overall goals
and objectives of the International
Visitor Leadership Program.
IV.3d.4. Alumni Outreach Follow on
Programming: No alumni outreach
follow-on programming is expected or
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will be funded. However, the Bureau
expects that all recipient organization(s)
will encourage and assist participants in
registering and using the State Alumni
Web site (https://alumni.state.gov) and
the Exchanges Connect Web site (https://
connect.state.gov) at multiple points
during their exchange experience, at a
minimum during program orientations
and pre-departure briefings as well as at
the end of programs to encourage
participants to create groups and/or
forums on exchanges connect. Proposals
should detail how the Web sites will be
promoted to exchange participants and
how the recipient organization(s) will
facilitate participant registration. The
Bureau expects that all recipient
organization(s) will place a link to both
State Alumni and Exchanges Connect
on their own Web sites.
IV.3d.5. Program Management:
Proposals should describe the
applicant’s plans for: overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA or any other requirements,
sustainability, etc.
IV.3e. Please Take the Following
Information Into Consideration When
Preparing the Proposed Budget
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit
comprehensive budgets for the entire
program. Funding levels are listed
under Section II of this announcement.
There must be summary budgets as well
as breakdowns reflecting the
administrative budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) Staff Salaries and Benefits;
(2) Office and Program Supplies;
(3) Telephone and Communications;
(4) Staff Travel and Per Diem;
(5) ADP Equipment Maintenance and
IT Costs;
(6) Indirect Costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: June 05,
2009.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/V–10–01.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.,
below rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Important Note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 10 number of copies
of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/V–10–01, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.
above, rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in this RFGP, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time. E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17739
automatically rejected by the Grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the
difference between a submission receipt
and a submission validation. Applicants
will receive a validation e-mail from
Grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is responsibility of all applicants
submitting proposals via the Grants.gov
Web portal to ensure that proposals
have been received by Grants.gov in
their entirety and ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting
from transmission or conversion
processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications
Executive Order 12372 does not apply
to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office. Eligible proposals
will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other
Department elements. Final funding
decisions are at the discretion of the
Department of State’s Assistant
Secretary for Educational and Cultural
Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards or cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Evidence of Understanding/
Program Planning: The proposal should
convey that the applicant has a good
understanding of the overall goals and
objectives of the IVL Program. It should
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
17740
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
exhibit originality, substance, and
precision, and be responsive to the
requirements stated in the RFGP and the
Solicitation Package. The proposal
should contain a detailed and relevant
work plan that demonstrates substantive
intent and logistical capacity. The
agenda and plan should adhere to the
program overview and guidelines
described in the RFGP and the POGI.
2. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of program resources and
interlocutors, program venue, etc.) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
3. Institutional Capacity: The award
recipient must have a Washington, DC
presence. Applicants who do not
currently have a Washington, DC
presence must include a detailed plan
in their proposal for establishing such a
presence by October 1, 2009. The costs
related to establishing such a presence
must be borne by the award recipient.
No such costs may be included in the
budget submission in this proposal. The
proposal should clearly demonstrate the
applicant’s capability for performing the
type of work required by the IVL
Program and how the institution will
execute its program activities to meet
the goals of the IVL Program. It should
reflect the applicant’s ability to design
and implement, in a timely and creative
manner, professional exchange
programs which encompass a variety of
project themes. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program goals. The proposal must
demonstrate that the applicant has or
can recruit adequate and well-trained
staff. All recipients must submit their
IVL Program and national itinerary data
electronically to the DoS by utilizing
either the eNPA tool provided by the
Department or the mandated standard
data format submission that has been
established as an interface to existing
legacy systems.
4. Institution’s Record/Ability: The
proposal should demonstrate an
institutional record of a minimum of
four years of successful experience in
conducting IVL or other professional
exchange programs, which are similar in
nature and magnitude to the scope of
work outlined in this solicitation. The
applicant must demonstrate the
potential for programming IVL
participants from multiple regions of the
world. Applicants should demonstrate
that their organizations would consult
with DoS program officers on a regular
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
basis to ensure that the assigned visitor
projects would consistently meet
program objectives. Proposals should
demonstrate an institutional record of
successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with
all reporting requirements for past
Bureau cooperative agreements as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
5. Project Evaluation: While program
agencies do not have sole responsibility
for program evaluation, proposals
should describe how program agency
will evaluate the activity’s success, both
as the activities unfold and through
required reporting at the conclusion of
group program, and address how
lessons learned will be incorporated in
future program planning. A description
of the methodology to be used to link
outcomes to original project objectives
is recommended.
6. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead
and administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. This includes acquiring and
retaining capable staff. All other costs,
such as building maintenance, should
be necessary and appropriate.
7. Cost-sharing: Proposals should
maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI.1b. Optional—The Following
Additional Requirements Apply to This
Project
VI. Award Administration Information
The U.S. Government is opposed to
prostitution and related activities,
which are inherently harmful and
dehumanizing, and contribute to the
phenomenon of trafficking in persons.
None of the funds made available under
this agreement may be used to promote,
support, or advocate the legalization or
practice of prostitution. Nothing in the
preceding sentence shall be construed to
preclude assistance designed to
ameliorate the suffering of, or health
risks to, victims while they are being
trafficked or after they are out of the
situation that resulted from such victims
being trafficked.
The recipient shall insert the
foregoing provision in all subagreements under this award.
This provision includes express terms
and conditions of the agreement and
any violation of it shall be grounds for
unilateral termination of the agreement
by the Department of State prior to the
end of its term.
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, and allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For Assistance Awards Involving Iran
A critical component of current U.S.
government Iran policy is the support
for indigenous Iranian voices. The State
Department has made the awarding of
grants for this purpose a key component
of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has
requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate
the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571,
582, and 635(b) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18
U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive
Order 13224; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department will collect
information from grantees and subgrantees regarding the identity and
background of their key employees and
Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact Patricia Johnson
(ECA/PE/V/C), Office of International
Visitors, by e-mail JohnsonPA2@state.gov for
additional information.
Prohibition on the Use of Federal Funds
To Promote, Support, or Advocate for
the Legalization or Practice of
Prostitution
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 72 / Thursday, April 16, 2009 / Notices
For Assistance Awards Involving the
Palestinian Authority, West Bank, and
Gaza
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
Patricia Johnson (ECA/PE/V/C), Office of
International Visitors, by e-mail
JohnsonPA2@state.gov for additional
information.
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.
OMB Circular A–87, Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
VI.3. Mandatory Reporting
Requirements
Award recipients must provide ECA
with a hard copy original plus one copy
of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This report
must disclose cost sharing and be
certified by the award recipient’s chief
financial officer or an officer of
comparable rank.
(2) Quarterly financial reports within
thirty (30) days following the end of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:47 Apr 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
calendar year quarter. These reports
should itemize separately International
Visitor costs, Voluntary Visitor costs,
English Language Officer/Interpreter
costs for International Visitors, English
Language Officer/Interpreter costs for
Voluntary Visitors, special project costs
by projects, and administrative costs for
the previous quarter on a cash basis.
These reports should also list separately
the number of English Language
Officers/Interpreters accompanying
International Visitors, and the number
of English Language Officers/
Interpreters accompanying Voluntary
Visitors for whom funds are expended.
Quarterly financial reports must be
certified by the award recipient’s chief
financial officer or an officer of
comparable rank. For further
information, please refer to the Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation
(POGI) document.
(3) Providing ECA with Quarterly
Projected Expenditure Reports: Due by
the 15th day of the 3rd month of each
quarter. These reports should indicate
projections for the next quarter in the
following categories: Grant Benefits:
Regional Program Visitor Benefits (plus
group enhancements, per diem and
ground transportation), Voluntary
Visitor Benefits (plus group
enhancements, per diem and ground
transportation), English Language
Office/Interpreter Benefits (plus per
diem and ground transportation), and
Multi-Regional Projects (MRP group
enhancements). Travel Manager
Company (TMC): Regional/MRP
Program domestic air travel, Voluntary
Visitor domestic air travel and English
Language Officers/Interpreter domestic
air travel. Number of Visitors: Number
of Regional/MRP Program Visitors,
number of Voluntary Visitors, and
number of English Language Officers/
Interpreters. The original hard copy of
the reports should be sent to ECA/PE/
V/C—Patricia Johnson, who is
responsible for Cooperative Agreement
administration. The report should also
be sent to JOHNSONPA2@state.gov.
(4) Such operating, statistical, and
financial information relating to the
program as may be requested by the DoS
to meet its reporting requirements and
answer inquiries concerning the
operation of the IVL Program, as
stipulated in the FY 2010 Project
Objectives, Goals, and Implementation.
(5) Reports analyzing evaluation
findings should be provided to the
Bureau in award recipient’s regular
program reports. Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected must be maintained
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17741
for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Patricia
Johnson, Office of International Visitors,
Community Relations Division, Room
247, Reference Number ECA/PE/V–08–
01, U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, telephone 202–494–8714, fax
202–453–8631, or e-mail
JohnsonPA2@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/V–
10–01. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 9, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–8640 Filed 4–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6585]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA)
Request for Grant Proposals: Youth
Ambassadors Program With South
America and Mexico
Announcement Type: New Grants.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/PY–09–51.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 72 (Thursday, April 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17734-17741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8640]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6580]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA); Request for
Grant Proposals: International Visitor Leadership Program Assistance
Awards
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/V-10-01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 19.402.
Key Dates: October 1, 2009-September 30, 2010 (pending availability
of funds).
Application Deadline: June 5, 2009.
Executive Summary: The Office of International Visitors, Division
of Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs (ECA/PE/V), United States Department of State (DoS)
announces an open competition for two assistance awards to develop and
implement International Visitor Leadership Programs (IVLP). The IVLP
seeks to increase mutual understanding between the U.S. and foreign
publics through carefully designed professional programs for
approximately 4,500 foreign visitors per year from all regions of the
world. The two awards will fund programming for a minimum of 251 and a
maximum of 712 International Visitors (IVs). Subject to availability of
funds, Award A will fund: (1) Up to approximately 593 visitors
($1,939,113), of which approximately 75 visitors will be funded, if
required, through seasonal administrative funding for one 7-month and
one 4-month program team included in this total or (2) up to
approximately 712 visitors ($2,326,936), of which 75 visitors will be
funded, if required, through seasonal administrative funding for one 7-
month and one 4-month program team included in this total. Award B will
fund: (1) Up to approximately 251 visitors ($684,657) or (2) up to
approximately 301 visitors ($821,588). Applicant organizations must
include two separate proposed budgets at the two different projected
funding levels described above for each award for which they apply. For
Award A, each of the proposed budgets should also
[[Page 17735]]
include a separate budget spreadsheet for the one 7-month and one 4-
month supplemental program team described above. Applicant
organizations may bid on one or both awards. Pending availability of
funds, one assistance award will be made for each category described
above. If an organization is interested in bidding on more than one
award, a separate proposal and budget is required for each award. See
Project Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) for definitions of
program-related terminology.
The intent of this announcement is to provide the opportunity for
organizations to develop and implement a variety of programs for
International Visitors from multiple regions of the world. Please refer
to the POGI for a breakdown of regions. The award recipients will
function as national program agencies (NPAs) and will work closely with
Department of State (DoS) Bureau staff, who will guide them through
programmatic, procedural, and budgetary issues for the full range of
IVL programs. (Hereafter, the terms ``award recipient'' and ``national
program agency'' will be used interchangeably to refer to the grantee
organization[s].)
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: Program Information.
Overview: The International Visitor Leadership Program seeks to
increase mutual understanding between the U.S. and foreign publics
through carefully designed professional programs. IVL programs support
U.S. foreign policy objectives. Participants are current or potential
foreign leaders in government, politics, media, education, science,
labor relations, non-government organizations (NGOs), the arts, and
other key fields. They are selected by officers of U.S. embassies
overseas and are approved by the DoS staff in Washington, DC. Since the
program's inception in 1940, there have been over 140,000 distinguished
participants in the program. Over 290 program alumni subsequently
became heads of state or government in their home countries. All IVL
programs must maintain a non-partisan character.
The Bureau seeks proposals from nonprofit organizations for
development and implementation of professional programs for Bureau-
sponsored International Visitors to the U.S. Once the awards are made,
separate proposals will be required for each group project [Single
Country (SCP), Sub-Regional (SRP), Regional (RP), and Multi-Regional
(MRP)] as well as less formal proposals for Individual and Individuals
Traveling Together (ITT) and Voluntary Visitors (Volvis) programs. Each
program will be focused on a substantive theme. Some typical IVL
program themes are: (1) U.S. foreign policy; (2) U.S. government and
political system; (3) economic development; (4) education; (5) media;
(6) interfaith dialogue; (7) freedom of information; (8) NGO
management; (9) women's issues; (10) tolerance and diversity; (11)
counterterrorism; (12) democracy and human rights; (13) rule of law;
(14) international crime; and (15) environmental issues. IVL programs
must conform to all Bureau requirements and guidelines. Please refer to
the Program Objectives, Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document for a
more detailed description of each type of IVL program.
Guidelines: Goals and objectives for each specific IVL program will
be shared with the award recipients at an appropriate time following
the announcement of the assistance awards. DoS will provide close
coordination and guidance throughout the duration of the awards. Award
recipients will consult closely with the responsible ECA/PE/V program
officer throughout the development, implementation, and evaluation of
each IVL program. Prospective program agencies should demonstrate the
potential to develop the following types of programs.
1. Programs must contain substantive meetings that focus on foreign
policy goals and program objectives and are presented by experts.
Meetings, site visits, and other program activities should promote
dialogue between participants and their U.S. professional counterparts.
Programs must be balanced to show different sides of an issue.
2. Most programs will be three weeks long and will begin in
Washington, DC, with an orientation and overview of the issues and a
central examination of Federal policies regarding these issues. Well-
paced program itineraries usually include visits to four or five
communities. Program itineraries ideally include urban and rural small
communities in diverse geographical and cultural regions of the U.S.,
as appropriate to the program theme.
3. Programs should provide opportunities for participants to
experience the diversity of American society and culture. Participants
in RPs or MRPs are divided into smaller sub-groups for simultaneous
visits to different communities, with subsequent opportunities to share
their experiences with the full group once it is reunited.
4. Programs should provide opportunities for the participants to
share a meal or similar experience (home hospitality) in the homes of
Americans of diverse occupational, age, gender, and ethnic groups. Some
individual and group programs might include an opportunity for an
overnight stay (home stay) in an American home.
5. Programs should provide opportunities for participants to
address student, civic and professional groups in relaxed and informal
settings.
6. Participants should have appropriate opportunities for site
visits and hands-on experiences that are relevant to program themes.
The award recipients may propose professional ``shadowing'' experiences
with U.S. professional colleagues for some programs (a typical
shadowing experience means spending a half- or full-workday with a
professional counterpart.)
7. Programs should also allow time for participants to reflect on
their experiences and, in group programs, to share observations with
program colleagues. Participants should have opportunities to visit
cultural and tourist sites.
8. The award recipients must make arrangements for community visits
through affiliates of the National Council for International Visitors
(NCIV). In cities where there is no such council, the award recipients
will arrange for coordination of local programs.
Qualifications
1. Proposals must demonstrate a minimum of four years of successful
experience in coordinating international exchanges.
2. Proposals must demonstrate the ability to develop and administer
IVL programs.
[[Page 17736]]
3. Proposals must demonstrate an applicant's broad knowledge of
international relations and U.S. foreign policy issues.
4. Proposals must demonstrate an applicant's broad knowledge of the
United States and U.S. domestic issues.
5. Award recipients must have a Washington, DC presence. Applicants
who do not currently have a Washington, DC presence must include a
detailed plan in their proposal for establishing such a presence by
October 1, 2009. The costs related to establishing such a presence must
be borne by the award recipient. No such costs may be included in the
budget submission in this proposal. The award recipient must have e-
mail capability, access to Internet resources, and the ability to
exchange data electronically with all partners involved in the
International Visitor Leadership Program.
6. Proposals must demonstrate that an applicant has an established
resource base of programming contacts and the ability to keep this
resource base continuously updated. This resource base should include
speakers, thematic specialists, or practitioners in a wide range of
professional fields in both the private and public sectors.
7. All proposals must demonstrate sound financial management.
8. All proposals must contain a sound management plan to carry out
the volume of work outlined in the Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation guidelines (POGI). This plan should include an
appropriate staffing pattern and a work plan/timeframe.
9. Applicant organizations must include two separate proposed
budgets at the two different projected funding levels for each award
for which they apply.
10. Proposals must describe capacity to employ additional staff
during particularly busy months of the IVLP cycle and to assume
additional projects, if requested. For Award A, each of the proposed
budgets should also include a separate budget spreadsheet for the one
7-month and one 4-month supplemental program team described above.
11. Applicants must include in their proposal narrative a
discussion of ``lessons learned'' from past exchange coordination
experiences, and how these will be applied in implementing the
International Visitor Leadership Program.
12. Award recipients must have the capability to utilize the world
wide Web for the electronic retrieval of program data from the
Department of State's IVLP Web site. The award recipient's office
technology must be capable of exchanging information with all partners
involved in the International Visitor Leadership Program. The award
recipient must have the capability to electronically communicate
through eNPA (Electronic National Program Agency), the software
application that allows award recipients to share information and data
electronically through the Department of State's Exchange Visitor
Database (EVDB-e) and with the Councils for International Visitors
(CIVs), as well as to produce a national program book and other
supporting documents (e.g., appointment requests and confirmations,
participant welcome letters, and mailing labels) generated directly
into Microsoft Word.
13. Applicants must include as a separate attachment under TAB G of
their proposals the following:
a. Samples of at least two schedules for international exchange or
training programs that they have coordinated within the past four years
that they are particularly proud of and that they feel demonstrate
their organization's competence and abilities to conduct the activities
outlined in the RFGP;
b. Samples of orientation and NPA self-evaluation materials used in
past international exchange or training programs.
Requirements for Past Performance References
Instead of Letters of Endorsement, DoS will use past performance as
an indicator of an applicant's ability to successfully perform the
work. TAB E of the proposal must contain between three and five
references who may be called upon to discuss recently completed or
ongoing work performed for professional exchange programs (which may
include the IVL Program). The reference must contain the information
outlined below. Please note that the requirements for submission of
past performance information also apply to all proposed sub-recipients
when the total estimated cost of the sub-award is over $100,000.
At a minimum, the applicant must provide the following information
for each reference:
Name of the reference organization.
Project name.
Project description.
Performance period of the contract/grant.
Amount of the contract/grant.
Technical contact person and telephone number for
referenced organization.
Administrative contact person and telephone number for
referenced organization.
DoS may contact representatives from the organizations cited in the
examples to obtain information on the applicant's past performance. DoS
also may obtain past performance information from sources other than
those identified by the applicant.
Personnel: Applicants must include complete and current resumes of
the key personnel who will be involved in the program management,
design, and implementation of IVL programs. Each resume is limited to
two pages per person.
Budget Guidelines
Applicants are required to submit a comprehensive line-item
administrative budget in accordance with the instructions in the
Solicitation Package (Proposal Submission Instructions.) The submission
must include a summary budget and a detailed budget showing all
administrative costs. Proposed staffing and costs associated with
staffing must be appropriate to the requirements outlined in the RFGP
and in the Solicitation Package. Cost sharing is encouraged and should
be shown in the budget presentation.
The Department of State is seeking proposals from public and
private nonprofit organizations that are not already in communication
with DoS regarding an FY-2010 assistance award from ECA/PE/V. All
applicants must have a minimum of four years' experience conducting
international exchanges, an ability to closely consult with DoS staff
throughout program administration, and proven fiscal management
integrity. Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, as sponsor and
manager of the International Visitor Leadership Program, plays a
significant role in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of all
types of International Visitor Leadership Programs and is responsible
for all communication with overseas missions. The Bureau will provide
close coordination and guidance throughout the duration of the awards.
Award recipients will consult closely with the responsible ECA/PE/V
program officer throughout the development, implementation, and
evaluation of each IVL program.
All liaison shall be with the designated elements of the DoS
relative to the following responsibilities incurred by the recipient
under this agreement:
A. Program Administration--Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs,
[[Page 17737]]
Office of International Visitors, Community Resources Division, ECA/PE/
V/C.
B. Financial--Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Grants
Division, ECA-IIP/EX/G.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2010 (pending availability of funds).
Approximate Total Funding: $2,623,770 or $3,148,524. Administrative
funding only; program funds provided as needed.
Number of Awards: Two.
Approximate Average Award: $1,443,074.
Floor of Award Range: $684,657 (251 visitors).
Ceiling of Award Range: $2,326,936 (712 visitors).
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, October 1,
2009.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: September 30, 2010.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew these cooperative agreements for five additional
fiscal years, before openly competing them again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, award recipients must maintain written records to
support all costs which are claimed as its contribution, as well as
costs to be paid by the Federal government. Such records are subject to
audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind
contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised),
Subpart C.23--Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event the recipient
organization does not provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as
stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced
in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a) Bureau cooperative agreement guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates awarding two cooperative agreements of which the minimum
award is $684,657. Therefore, organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. Program costs will be transferred
directly to the award recipient based upon International Visitor
workload, and should not be included in the proposal. The Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
(b) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the
technical eligibility requirements specified in the Proposal Submission
Instructions (PSI) and the Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation (POGI) documents. Failure to do so will result in
proposals being declared technically ineligible and given no further
consideration in the review process.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete Federal Register announcement
before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1. Contact Information to Request an Application Package
Please contact the Office of International Visitors, Community
Relations Division (ECA/PE/V/C), Room 247, U.S. Department of State,
SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, telephone (202) 453-
8624, fax (202) 453-8631 number, or e-mail JohnsonPA2@state.gov to
request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number (ECA/PE/V-10-01) located at the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from https://grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further
information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application forms
and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Patricia Johnson and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number (ECA/PE/V-10-01) located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm or from
the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a.
You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b.
All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c.
You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or
[[Page 17738]]
cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the past
four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d.
Please take into consideration the following information when
preparing the proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1. Adherence to all regulations governing the J Visa: The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed emphasis
on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa)
Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the
applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR
part 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Office of International Visitors (ECA/PE/V) will be responsible
for issuing DS-2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547. Telephone: (202) 203-5029.
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2. Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106--113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Successful monitoring
and evaluation depend heavily on setting clear objectives and outcomes
at the outset of a program. In support of the Bureau's evaluation
goals, the Office of International Visitors will administer a post-
program evaluation for International Visitors upon conclusion of
Regional and Multi-Regional programs.
In addition, applicants must monitor and evaluate the program's
success, both as activities unfold and at the end of each program. (See
Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document.) Proposal
submissions should include a monitoring and evaluation plan that
demonstrates: An understanding of overall IVLP goals, as well as the
objectives of assigned projects; the anticipated results and outcomes,
including specific changes in International Visitors' behavior,
knowledge, skills, and status resulting from the program activities;
and the link between the outcomes and the original project objectives.
Proposals should further demonstrate how applicants will obtain an
understanding of the goals and objectives of each assigned IVL program,
and how applicants will review and analyze the outcomes and results
upon conclusion of each IVL program. For regional and multi-regional
programs, participation at a final oral evaluation session is expected
and a final program report is required. (See Project Objectives, Goals
and Implementation (POGI) document.) Proposal submissions should
demonstrate how award recipients will apply the feedback provided by
International Visitors to strengthen the overall goals and objectives
of the International Visitor Leadership Program.
IV.3d.4. Alumni Outreach Follow on Programming: No alumni outreach
follow-on programming is expected or will be funded. However, the
Bureau expects that all recipient organization(s) will encourage and
assist participants in registering and using the State Alumni Web site
(https://alumni.state.gov) and the Exchanges Connect Web site (https://connect.state.gov) at multiple points during their exchange experience,
at a minimum during program orientations and pre-departure briefings as
well as at the end of programs to encourage participants to create
groups and/or forums on exchanges connect. Proposals should detail how
the Web sites will be promoted to exchange participants and how the
recipient organization(s) will facilitate participant registration. The
Bureau expects that all recipient organization(s) will place a link to
both State Alumni and Exchanges Connect on their own Web sites.
IV.3d.5. Program Management: Proposals should describe the
applicant's plans for: overall program management, staffing,
coordination with ECA or any other requirements, sustainability, etc.
IV.3e. Please Take the Following Information Into Consideration When
Preparing the Proposed Budget
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit comprehensive budgets for the
entire program. Funding levels are listed under Section II of this
announcement. There must be summary budgets as well as breakdowns
reflecting the administrative budgets. Applicants may provide separate
sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or activity to
provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) Staff Salaries and Benefits;
(2) Office and Program Supplies;
(3) Telephone and Communications;
(4) Staff Travel and Per Diem;
(5) ADP Equipment Maintenance and IT Costs;
(6) Indirect Costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission
Application Deadline Date: June 05, 2009.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/V-10-01.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
[[Page 17739]]
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1., below rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important Note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and 10 number of copies of the application should be
sent to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/V-10-01, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM,
Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in
applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1. above, rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in this RFGP,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the `Get Started'
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support. Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726. Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time. E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
Grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from Grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety and ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications
Executive Order 12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office. Eligible proposals
will be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards or cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Evidence of Understanding/Program Planning: The proposal should
convey that the applicant has a good understanding of the overall goals
and objectives of the IVL Program. It should
[[Page 17740]]
exhibit originality, substance, and precision, and be responsive to the
requirements stated in the RFGP and the Solicitation Package. The
proposal should contain a detailed and relevant work plan that
demonstrates substantive intent and logistical capacity. The agenda and
plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described in
the RFGP and the POGI.
2. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
program resources and interlocutors, program venue, etc.) and program
content (orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
3. Institutional Capacity: The award recipient must have a
Washington, DC presence. Applicants who do not currently have a
Washington, DC presence must include a detailed plan in their proposal
for establishing such a presence by October 1, 2009. The costs related
to establishing such a presence must be borne by the award recipient.
No such costs may be included in the budget submission in this
proposal. The proposal should clearly demonstrate the applicant's
capability for performing the type of work required by the IVL Program
and how the institution will execute its program activities to meet the
goals of the IVL Program. It should reflect the applicant's ability to
design and implement, in a timely and creative manner, professional
exchange programs which encompass a variety of project themes. Proposed
personnel and institutional resources should be adequate and
appropriate to achieve the program goals. The proposal must demonstrate
that the applicant has or can recruit adequate and well-trained staff.
All recipients must submit their IVL Program and national itinerary
data electronically to the DoS by utilizing either the eNPA tool
provided by the Department or the mandated standard data format
submission that has been established as an interface to existing legacy
systems.
4. Institution's Record/Ability: The proposal should demonstrate an
institutional record of a minimum of four years of successful
experience in conducting IVL or other professional exchange programs,
which are similar in nature and magnitude to the scope of work outlined
in this solicitation. The applicant must demonstrate the potential for
programming IVL participants from multiple regions of the world.
Applicants should demonstrate that their organizations would consult
with DoS program officers on a regular basis to ensure that the
assigned visitor projects would consistently meet program objectives.
Proposals should demonstrate an institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting requirements for past Bureau cooperative
agreements as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
5. Project Evaluation: While program agencies do not have sole
responsibility for program evaluation, proposals should describe how
program agency will evaluate the activity's success, both as the
activities unfold and through required reporting at the conclusion of
group program, and address how lessons learned will be incorporated in
future program planning. A description of the methodology to be used to
link outcomes to original project objectives is recommended.
6. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead and administrative components
of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as
low as possible. This includes acquiring and retaining capable staff.
All other costs, such as building maintenance, should be necessary and
appropriate.
7. Cost-sharing: Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through
other private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, and allocated and committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award
Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. Optional--The Following Additional Requirements Apply to This
Project
For Assistance Awards Involving Iran
A critical component of current U.S. government Iran policy is the
support for indigenous Iranian voices. The State Department has made
the awarding of grants for this purpose a key component of its Iran
policy. As a condition of licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b),
531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as
amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive Order 13224; and
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6. These licensing conditions
mandate that the Department conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct
this vetting the Department will collect information from grantees and
sub-grantees regarding the identity and background of their key
employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran complies
with requirements, please contact Patricia Johnson (ECA/PE/V/C),
Office of International Visitors, by e-mail JohnsonPA2@state.gov for
additional information.
Prohibition on the Use of Federal Funds To Promote, Support, or
Advocate for the Legalization or Practice of Prostitution
The U.S. Government is opposed to prostitution and related
activities, which are inherently harmful and dehumanizing, and
contribute to the phenomenon of trafficking in persons. None of the
funds made available under this agreement may be used to promote,
support, or advocate the legalization or practice of prostitution.
Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed to preclude
assistance designed to ameliorate the suffering of, or health risks to,
victims while they are being trafficked or after they are out of the
situation that resulted from such victims being trafficked.
The recipient shall insert the foregoing provision in all sub-
agreements under this award.
This provision includes express terms and conditions of the
agreement and any violation of it shall be grounds for unilateral
termination of the agreement by the Department of State prior to the
end of its term.
[[Page 17741]]
For Assistance Awards Involving the Palestinian Authority, West Bank,
and Gaza
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact
Patricia Johnson (ECA/PE/V/C), Office of International Visitors, by
e-mail JohnsonPA2@state.gov for additional information.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.
OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Mandatory Reporting Requirements
Award recipients must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus
one copy of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award. This report must disclose cost sharing and
be certified by the award recipient's chief financial officer or an
officer of comparable rank.
(2) Quarterly financial reports within thirty (30) days following
the end of the calendar year quarter. These reports should itemize
separately International Visitor costs, Voluntary Visitor costs,
English Language Officer/Interpreter costs for International Visitors,
English Language Officer/Interpreter costs for Voluntary Visitors,
special project costs by projects, and administrative costs for the
previous quarter on a cash basis. These reports should also list
separately the number of English Language Officers/Interpreters
accompanying International Visitors, and the number of English Language
Officers/Interpreters accompanying Voluntary Visitors for whom funds
are expended. Quarterly financial reports must be certified by the
award recipient's chief financial officer or an officer of comparable
rank. For further information, please refer to the Project Objectives,
Goals, and Implementation (POGI) document.
(3) Providing ECA with Quarterly Projected Expenditure Reports: Due
by the 15th day of the 3\rd\ month of each quarter. These reports
should indicate projections for the next quarter in the following
categories: Grant Benefits: Regional Program Visitor Benefits (plus
group enhancements, per diem and ground transportation), Voluntary
Visitor Benefits (plus group enhancements, per diem and ground
transportation), English Language Office/Interpreter Benefits (plus per
diem and ground transportation), and Multi-Regional Projects (MRP group
enhancements). Travel Manager Company (TMC): Regional/MRP Program
domestic air travel, Voluntary Visitor domestic air travel and English
Language Officers/Interpreter domestic air travel. Number of Visitors:
Number of Regional/MRP Program Visitors, number of Voluntary Visitors,
and number of English Language Officers/Interpreters. The original hard
copy of the reports should be sent to ECA/PE/V/C--Patricia Johnson, who
is responsible for Cooperative Agreement administration. The report
should also be sent to JOHNSONPA2@state.gov.
(4) Such operating, statistical, and financial information relating
to the program as may be requested by the DoS to meet its reporting
requirements and answer inquiries concerning the operation of the IVL
Program, as stipulated in the FY 2010 Project Objectives, Goals, and
Implementation.
(5) Reports analyzing evaluation findings should be provided to the
Bureau in award recipient's regular program reports. Please refer to
IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for
Program Monitoring and Evaluation information. All data collected must
be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the Bureau
upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Patricia Johnson,
Office of International Visitors, Community Relations Division, Room
247, Reference Number ECA/PE/V-08-01, U.S. Department of State, SA-44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, telephone 202-494-8714, fax
202-453-8631, or e-mail JohnsonPA2@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/V-10-01. Please read the
complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals.
Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this
competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been
completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: April 9, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-8640 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P