New Standards for Letter-Sized Booklets, 17399-17403 [E9-8532]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
navigation areas found in § 165.13 of
this part apply to the regulated
navigation area described in paragraph
(b).
(2) All vessels of 100 gross tons and
greater are not permitted to transit the
regulated area without permission from
the District Commander or his
representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, mariners can contact
Sector North Carolina at telephone
number (252) 247–4570.
(3) Any vessel transiting the regulated
area must do so at a no-wake speed
during the effective period. The Coast
Guard vessels enforcing this section can
be contacted on Marine Band Radio,
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel by siren, radio, flashing light or
other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed. If permission
is granted, all persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
District Commander or his
representative and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 5 a.m. on April
16, 2009, through 8 p.m. on June 5,
2009.
Dated: April 6, 2009.
F.M. Rosa, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9–8610 Filed 4–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Standards for Letter-Sized
Booklets
Postal ServiceTM.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Postal Service adopts
new Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail
Manual (DMM®) to reflect changes to
the construction and sealing of lettersized booklets mailed at automation,
presorted machinable or carrier route
letter prices. We also adopt a definition
of booklets and clarify weight standards
for letter-sized mail.
DATES: Effective Date: September 8,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krista Finazzo, 202–268–7304; Bill
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Apr 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Chatfield, 202–268–7278; or Susan
Thomas, 202–268–7268.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 29, 2008, a proposed rule was
published in the Federal Register (73
FR 79430–79435), that provided
information on changes to tab
placement and construction of folded
self-mailers and booklets. The proposed
rule followed two years of collaborative
work with mailers to analyze and test a
wide variety of letter-size booklets and
other letter-size mailpiece designs. In
response to the proposed rule, the Postal
Service received more than 900
comments.
On February 3, 2009, a revision to our
original proposal was announced in the
DMM Advisory and PCC Insider
indicating that the design and tab
placement changes for folded selfmailers would become optional
recommendations instead of
requirements. Current standards for
folded self-mailers will remain in effect
and we will continue to work with the
mailing community to test various
folded self-mailer designs. Mailers’
Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC)
member associations that have an
interest in folded self-mailers will
coordinate the opportunity to
participate in our research. We will
publish recommendations regarding
folded self-mailers in September 2009.
An additional proposed rule for folded
self-mailers will be published upon
completion of the test of mailersupplied sample pieces.
Changes for Booklets
General
This final rule includes the new
required DMM standards for design,
preparation, and sealing of machinable
and automation letter-size booklets. We
also describe in this final rule,
recommended upgrades to the new
requirements. We base these
recommendations on observations of a
wide variety of booklets tested and
observed over the past several years.
Following these recommendations will
minimize mailpiece damage and
maximize the efficient processing of
booklets.
Definition
Booklets consist of bound sheets or
pages. Binding methods that are
compatible with machinable processing
include perfect binding, permanent
fastening with at least two staples in the
manufacturing fold (saddle stitched),
pressed glue, or another binding method
that creates a nearly uniformly thick
mailpiece. Spiral bindings are not
machinable so booklets prepared with
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17399
spiral bindings do not qualify for
automation prices. Large booklets may
be folded to letter-size for mailing if the
final mailpiece remains uniform in
thickness.
Physical Characteristics
The maximum height for all
machinable and automation booklets is
six inches and the maximum length can
vary between 9 and 101⁄2 inches,
depending on the booklet design. The
minimum thickness for booklets is 0.009
inch and the maximum thickness is 0.25
inch regardless of size. Thickness is
measured at the spine of the mailpiece.
The current maximum weight of 3
ounces has not changed and is
applicable to all mailpieces prepared
without envelopes. However, to
improve machinability we recommend
reducing the length of 3-ounce booklets
to a final trim size of 9 inches.
Cover stock requirements vary with
40-pound minimum basis weight for
folded booklet designs and 60- or 70pound minimum basis weight for pieces
longer than 9 inches. Lighter-weight
paper tends to be easily damaged in
processing equipment. The use of paper
that is 10 pounds heavier than the
required minimum basis weight is
recommended for better processing
performance. We strongly recommend
using a minimum of 70-pound paper as
cover stock on mailpiece designs that
approach maximum booklet
dimensions. References to paper
weights are for book-grade paper unless
otherwise specified. A paper grade
conversion table is included in DMM
Exhibit 201.3.2 for reference.
The bottom edge of booklets must be
a bound edge or fold unless the
mailpiece is prepared as an oblong
booklet. Oblong booklets must be
prepared with a spine on the leading
edge. Booklets with a spine on the
trailing edge are nonmachinable.
Tabs used to seal booklets must not
have perforations. Generally, booklets
need three 11⁄2-inch tabs as closures. For
larger or heavier booklets, we
recommend 2-inch paper tabs. Glue
spots or a continuous glue line may be
used to seal some booklet designs.
Booklets that do not comply with the
new standards will not be eligible for
machinable or automation letter prices.
Nonmachinable booklets will be
assessed a surcharge (for First-Class
Mail®), pay nonmachinable prices (for
Standard Mail®), or pay nonbarcoded
prices (for Periodicals).
Overview of Comments
We received more than 900 customer
comments in response to the proposed
standards. Of these, 79 noted concerns
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
17400
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
about booklet design changes. Many
commenters expressed concerns about
multiple issues. Below we describe all
comments and not those exclusively
about booklets.
There were 442 comments concerning
tabs without perforations. Of these, 287
were form letters or parts of form letters
stating that tabs without perforations
would make mailpieces hard to open for
the elderly and infirm. Six came from
manufacturers of tabs. Two mail
preparers claim that mail with solid tabs
went unread. At the request of a group
of mail owners, one mail preparer
completed a 6-month study of response
rates to mailpieces prepared with three
solid tabs. No appreciable change in
response rate occurred.
Booklets with tabs that fail during
high-speed processing sustain damage
and cause damage to other mailpieces.
Our tests revealed that tabs with
perforations are easily broken, often do
not maintain their integrity, and are
damaged in transport prior to entering
the mailstream. To minimize tab failure,
tabs used to seal booklets claiming
automation or machinable prices may
not be perforated. Solid tabs made of
plastic, vinyl, translucent paper, opaque
paper, or cellophane tape is acceptable.
Tab placement generated 401
responses. Commenters cited the lack of
machinery capable of applying two tabs
on the leading edge and one tab on the
trailing edge of each booklet, the cost of
upgrading existing tabbing equipment,
and the amount of extra space required
to install upgrades as reasons why they
objected to the proposed standards for
tab placement. Three commenters stated
that the tabbing systems they purchased
would become obsolete because they
can only apply tabs on the top open
edges. There were 170 mailers
concerned about tab size. They objected
to the introduction of minimum tab
sizes that exceed one inch because their
equipment couldn’t apply tabs larger
than one inch.
We realize that using different size
tabs on booklets, adding an additional
tab to the leading edge, and affixing
them in locations that were until now
optional, will require some adjustments
to customer manufacturing processes.
Some customers are already producing
and mailing booklets with the tabbing
configurations required by the new
standards despite the obstacles
mentioned. In addition, at least one
manufacturer of tabbing machines is
advertising a unit with the capability of
tabbing mail in the proposed locations.
Mailer and controlled tests
demonstrate that using 11⁄2-inch tabs to
seal booklets in place of the smaller 1inch tabs improved the productivity of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Apr 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
processing. Sorting booklets sealed with
11⁄2-inch tabs still reduced machine
throughput compared to processing
other letter-size pieces. To improve
productivity and processing, 11⁄2-inch
tabs are required. We will continue to
monitor booklet processing
performance.
The increase in the number of tabs
required to seal booklets generated 179
comments. Remarks focused on the
absence of notification, with some
commenters stating that the mailings
they present now are not generating
error reports from the plants that
process them. As booklet volumes
increase in the mailstream, processing
operations must divert these mailings to
manual or flat mail operations to avoid
mailpiece damage and machine down
time. The USPS generated numerous
irregularity reports concerning poorly
prepared booklets over the past several
years. These reports have documented
instances of jammed machines and torn
mailpieces. Our experiences processing
booklets as live mailpieces and in a
variety of controlled and customersupplied mailpiece tests show that the
new standards are needed. Customers
who observed their own booklets being
tested acknowledged that although their
mail is currently being charged
automation or machinable prices, it
cannot be machine sorted.
A number of commenters stated that
we did not justify the amount of added
workload applying additional tabs
would impose on the customer. Testing
demonstrated that the machine
throughput when processing booklets
with two 1-inch tabs on the top edge
was half the throughput for booklets
with two 11⁄2-inch tabs on the lead edge
and one tab on the trailing edge, and
almost one fourth the throughput for
enveloped letter mail. Therefore, we
believe this warrants the changes.
Many commenters objected to the
definition of a folded self-mailer. The
definition of folded self-mailers will be
refined in conjunction with a
subsequent phase of testing customersupplied samples and will be published
at a later date as part of the changes to
folded self-mailer standards indicated
by test results.
Only 31 customers expressed
concerns about standards for static
charge and coefficient of friction. Some
commenters wanted to know where to
buy paper that conformed to the
standards while others asked how mail
would be tested for these characteristics
in the acceptance units. We recommend
this requirement while further methods
are explored to measure these standards.
We recommend testing your mailpieces
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for static charge and coefficient of
friction when possible.
Forty-nine commenters asked that we
delay changing standards for booklets
and folded self-mailers until the
economy turns around. We believe that
implementing standards for booklets
will improve the processing and cost
effective handling of these pieces.
However, we will work with the mailing
community to further refine standards
for folded self-mailers.
Some commenters wondered how
they could determine if their mailpiece
was made of high tear strength paper.
Paper distributors generally recognize
which of their products have high tear
strength, and most papers sold in office
supply stores have adequate tear
strength. High tear strength paper has
properties like a high fiber length, a low
degree of beating, and for machine-made
papers, fiber orientation. Mailpieces
made of high tear strength paper can be
sorted on automated processing
equipment without tearing or shattering.
Some commenters objected to the
increase in required paper grade for the
covers of booklets. Paper values
published in the DMM varied by
product. Our new booklet illustrations
and descriptions are based on bookgrade paper. Paper grades are printed on
the packaging of reams, boxes, and rolls
of paper.
The maximum weight of automation
letters was a concern for some
customers. The proposal did not change
the maximum allowable weight for
booklets. According to current standards
in DMM 201.3.14.4, letters that weigh
more than 3 ounces must be prepared in
a sealed envelope, therefore booklets
weighing more than 3 ounces must be
prepared in sealed envelopes. Our
standards reflect this required mailpiece
characteristic.
Based on the results of continued
testing, a modification to the standards
was published in the Federal Register
on December 29, 2008, increasing the
amount of acceptable tab overhang from
1/32 of an inch to 1/16 of an inch.
The Postal Service adopts the
following changes to Mailing Standards
of the United States Postal Service,
Domestic Mail Manual (DMM),
incorporated by reference in the Code of
Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and
procedure, Postal Service.
■ Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is
amended as follows.
PART 111—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
17401
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632,
3633, and 5001.
2. Revise the following sections of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM) as follows:
1.1.3 All Machinable Letters
[Revise the first sentence of 1.1.3 as
follows:]
All pieces of First-Class Mail and
Standard Mail machinable letters must
meet the standards for automationcompatible letters in 201.3.0. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM)
3.0 Physical Standards for
Automation Letters and Cards
[Revise text of 3.1 as follows:]
*
3.1 Basic Standards Automation
Letters and Cards
Letters and cards claimed at any
machinable, automation, or Standard
Mail carrier route price, must meet the
standards in 3.0. Unless prepared as a
folded self-mailer, booklet, or postcard
under 3.14 through 3.16, each
machinable or automation letter must be
a sealed envelope (the preferred
method) or, if unenveloped, must be
sealed or glued completely along all
four sides.
■
*
*
*
*
200 Commercial Mail Letters and
Cards
201
Physical Standards
1.0 Physical Standards for
Machinable Letters and Cards
1.1 Physical Standards for
Machinable Letters
*
*
*
*
*
Book wt.
[Delete current 3.4 through 3.6 in their
entirety.]
[Renumber current 3.2 through 3.3 as
new 3.3 through 3.4.]
[Add new 3.2 as follows:]
3.2
Paper Weight
Mailpieces should be constructed
from high tear strength paper stock. All
references in 3.0 to paper basis weight
are for book-grade paper unless
otherwise stated. The conversion table
in Exhibit 3.2 provides a paper basis
weight cross-reference.
Exhibit 3.2 Paper Basis Weight
Conversion Table
Note: Paper basis weight is based on the
weight of 500 sheets of: 25 x 38 inch sheets
of book-grade paper, 17 x 22 inch bond-grade
paper, 20 x 26 inch sheets of cover-grade
paper, 24 x 36 inch sheets of newsprint. For
example, if 500 sheets of book-grade paper
weigh 39 pounds, the paper is considered 39pound book paper.
Bond wt.
39 .........................................................................................................................................................
40 .........................................................................................................................................................
50 .........................................................................................................................................................
55 .........................................................................................................................................................
60 .........................................................................................................................................................
70 .........................................................................................................................................................
75 .........................................................................................................................................................
80 .........................................................................................................................................................
90 .........................................................................................................................................................
100 .......................................................................................................................................................
110 .......................................................................................................................................................
128 .......................................................................................................................................................
[Revise heading and introductory text
of renumbered 3.3 as follows:]
3.3
Dimensions and Shape
Each machinable or automation lettersized piece must be rectangular (see
1.1.1) and must meet the following
standards (see 3.15 for booklets):
*
*
*
*
*
[Add new 3.5 as follows:]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
3.5 Maximum Weight, Machinable
and Automation Letters and Cards
16:06 Apr 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Heavy Letter Mail (Over 3 Ounces)
Heavy letter mail (letter-size pieces
over 3 ounces) must be prepared in a
sealed envelope, may not contain stiff
enclosures, and must have an 11-digit
delivery point POSTNET or an
Intelligent Mail barcode with a routing
code in the address block (see 202.5.0).
*
*
*
*
*
[Revise heading and text of 3.11 as
follows:]
3.11
The following maximum weight
limits apply:
a. Booklets and folded self-mailers—
3 ounces.
b. Machinable enveloped letters and
cards—3.3 ounces.
c. Automation enveloped letters and
cards—3.5 ounces (see 3.6 for pieces
over 3 ounces.)
[Renumber current 3.14.4 as new 3.6
and revise heading and text as follows:]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
3.6
Tabs, Tape, and Glue
Tabs on booklets must be at least 11⁄2
inches in width. The tab placement
standards in 3.15 are subject to 1⁄4-inch
variance in either direction. Tabs may
be made of opaque paper, translucent
paper, vinyl or plastic, and must not
contain perforations. Cellophane tape
may also be used as a closure. The
following standards also apply:
a. Translucent paper tabs should be
made of paper with a minimum of 40pound basis weight.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15
16
20
22
24
28
30
31
36
40
44
50
Cover wt.
21
22
27
30
33
40
41
44
50
56
60
70
Newsprint wt.
35
36
45
50
55
64
68
73
82
91
100
116
b. Opaque paper tabs should be made
of a minimum of 60-pound basis weight
paper with a tear strength of at least 56
grams of force in the machine direction
(MD) and 60 grams of force in the cross
direction (CD).
c. Tabs in the barcode clear zone must
have a paper face meeting the standards
for background reflectance and, if the
barcode is not preprinted by the mailer,
the standards for acceptance of waterbased ink.
d. Vinyl tabs and cellophane tape
closures are not acceptable within the
barcode clear zone.
e. Tabs must be tight against the edge
of the mailpiece. A maximum 1⁄16-inch
overhang is recommended.
f. Glue spots may be used in lieu of
tabs and must be placed within 3⁄4-inch
of the open edges (see Exhibit
201.3.11.f).
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
17402
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Exhibit 201.3.11.f
Placement
3.15.2
[Revise the title of 3.14 and
restructure as follows:]
Glue Spot
3.14
Folded Self-Mailers
[Add new 3.14.1 to read as follows:]
3.14.1
g. Continuous glue lines may be used
as cover-to-cover seals and must be
placed along the entire length of the
open edge and end no more than 3⁄4inch from the open ends (see Exhibit
201.3.11.g).
Exhibit 201.3.11.g
Placement
*
*
*
3.15
3.15.1
Booklets
Definition
Booklets must have a bound edge.
Sheets that are fastened with at least
two staples in the manufacturing fold
(saddle stitched), perfect bound,
pressed-glued, or joined together by
another binding method that produces
an end where pages are attached
together are considered booklets.
Booklets are open on three sides before
sealing, similar in design to a book. In
general, booklets must be uniformly
thick. Large bound booklets that are
folded for mailing qualify for
automation and machinable prices if the
final mailpiece remains nearly uniform
in thickness.
3.15.3
Physical Standards for Booklets
Booklets must be:
a. Height: Not more than 6 inches or
less than 3.5 inches high.
b. Length: Not more than 10.5 inches
or less than 5 inches long. See Exhibit
3.15.4 for some booklet designs with
shorter maximum lengths.
c. Thickness: Not more than 0.25 inch
or less than 0.009 inch thick.
d. Weight: Not more than 3 ounces.
e. Aspect ratio: Within 1.3 to 2.5 (see
201.3.1).
3.15.4
Booklet Design and Sealing
Booklets may be designed with the
spine or final fold at the bottom or on
the leading edge. See Exhibit 3.15.4 for
design and sealing standards.
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ER15AP09.001
*
The standards in 3.14.2 for folded
self-mailers are basic requirements.
[Renumber current 3.14.1 as new
3.14.2.]
[Renumber current 3.14.2 as new 3.15
and revise as follows:]
Booklet covers generally must be
made with a minimum paper basis
weight of 60-pounds or equivalent.
Minimum basis weights are higher for
some designs (see 3.15.4).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Apr 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
ER15AP09.000
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
*
Glue Line
General
Paper
[Renumber current 3.14.3 as new
3.16.]
[Renumber current 3.14.4 as new 3.6.]
[Renumber current 3.15 as new 3.17.]
*
*
*
*
*
We will publish an appropriate
amendment to 39 CFR part 111.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E9–8532 Filed 4–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–C
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 35
[EPA–HQ–OW–2006–0765; FRL–8792–3]
RIN 2040–AE99
Withdrawal of NPDES Voluntary Permit
Fee Incentive for Clean Water Act
Section 106 Grants; Allotment Formula
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action on
withdrawal of a regulation revising the
allotment formula contained in EPA’s
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:06 Apr 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17403
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 106
Water Pollution Control grant
regulations. The current regulations
include a financial incentive for States
to voluntarily collect adequate National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit fees. This final rule
withdraws the financial incentive for
States to voluntarily collect permit fees.
DATES: This rule is effective on April 15,
2009 without further notice.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OW–2006–0765. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
ER15AP09.002
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 71 / Wednesday, April 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17399-17403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8532]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Standards for Letter-Sized Booklets
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service adopts new Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM[supreg]) to reflect
changes to the construction and sealing of letter-sized booklets mailed
at automation, presorted machinable or carrier route letter prices. We
also adopt a definition of booklets and clarify weight standards for
letter-sized mail.
DATES: Effective Date: September 8, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Krista Finazzo, 202-268-7304; Bill
Chatfield, 202-268-7278; or Susan Thomas, 202-268-7268.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 29, 2008, a proposed rule was
published in the Federal Register (73 FR 79430-79435), that provided
information on changes to tab placement and construction of folded
self-mailers and booklets. The proposed rule followed two years of
collaborative work with mailers to analyze and test a wide variety of
letter-size booklets and other letter-size mailpiece designs. In
response to the proposed rule, the Postal Service received more than
900 comments.
On February 3, 2009, a revision to our original proposal was
announced in the DMM Advisory and PCC Insider indicating that the
design and tab placement changes for folded self-mailers would become
optional recommendations instead of requirements. Current standards for
folded self-mailers will remain in effect and we will continue to work
with the mailing community to test various folded self-mailer designs.
Mailers' Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) member associations that
have an interest in folded self-mailers will coordinate the opportunity
to participate in our research. We will publish recommendations
regarding folded self-mailers in September 2009. An additional proposed
rule for folded self-mailers will be published upon completion of the
test of mailer-supplied sample pieces.
Changes for Booklets
General
This final rule includes the new required DMM standards for design,
preparation, and sealing of machinable and automation letter-size
booklets. We also describe in this final rule, recommended upgrades to
the new requirements. We base these recommendations on observations of
a wide variety of booklets tested and observed over the past several
years. Following these recommendations will minimize mailpiece damage
and maximize the efficient processing of booklets.
Definition
Booklets consist of bound sheets or pages. Binding methods that are
compatible with machinable processing include perfect binding,
permanent fastening with at least two staples in the manufacturing fold
(saddle stitched), pressed glue, or another binding method that creates
a nearly uniformly thick mailpiece. Spiral bindings are not machinable
so booklets prepared with spiral bindings do not qualify for automation
prices. Large booklets may be folded to letter-size for mailing if the
final mailpiece remains uniform in thickness.
Physical Characteristics
The maximum height for all machinable and automation booklets is
six inches and the maximum length can vary between 9 and 10\1/2\
inches, depending on the booklet design. The minimum thickness for
booklets is 0.009 inch and the maximum thickness is 0.25 inch
regardless of size. Thickness is measured at the spine of the
mailpiece.
The current maximum weight of 3 ounces has not changed and is
applicable to all mailpieces prepared without envelopes. However, to
improve machinability we recommend reducing the length of 3-ounce
booklets to a final trim size of 9 inches.
Cover stock requirements vary with 40-pound minimum basis weight
for folded booklet designs and 60- or 70-pound minimum basis weight for
pieces longer than 9 inches. Lighter-weight paper tends to be easily
damaged in processing equipment. The use of paper that is 10 pounds
heavier than the required minimum basis weight is recommended for
better processing performance. We strongly recommend using a minimum of
70-pound paper as cover stock on mailpiece designs that approach
maximum booklet dimensions. References to paper weights are for book-
grade paper unless otherwise specified. A paper grade conversion table
is included in DMM Exhibit 201.3.2 for reference.
The bottom edge of booklets must be a bound edge or fold unless the
mailpiece is prepared as an oblong booklet. Oblong booklets must be
prepared with a spine on the leading edge. Booklets with a spine on the
trailing edge are nonmachinable.
Tabs used to seal booklets must not have perforations. Generally,
booklets need three 1\1/2\-inch tabs as closures. For larger or heavier
booklets, we recommend 2-inch paper tabs. Glue spots or a continuous
glue line may be used to seal some booklet designs.
Booklets that do not comply with the new standards will not be
eligible for machinable or automation letter prices. Nonmachinable
booklets will be assessed a surcharge (for First-Class Mail[supreg]),
pay nonmachinable prices (for Standard Mail[supreg]), or pay
nonbarcoded prices (for Periodicals).
Overview of Comments
We received more than 900 customer comments in response to the
proposed standards. Of these, 79 noted concerns
[[Page 17400]]
about booklet design changes. Many commenters expressed concerns about
multiple issues. Below we describe all comments and not those
exclusively about booklets.
There were 442 comments concerning tabs without perforations. Of
these, 287 were form letters or parts of form letters stating that tabs
without perforations would make mailpieces hard to open for the elderly
and infirm. Six came from manufacturers of tabs. Two mail preparers
claim that mail with solid tabs went unread. At the request of a group
of mail owners, one mail preparer completed a 6-month study of response
rates to mailpieces prepared with three solid tabs. No appreciable
change in response rate occurred.
Booklets with tabs that fail during high-speed processing sustain
damage and cause damage to other mailpieces. Our tests revealed that
tabs with perforations are easily broken, often do not maintain their
integrity, and are damaged in transport prior to entering the
mailstream. To minimize tab failure, tabs used to seal booklets
claiming automation or machinable prices may not be perforated. Solid
tabs made of plastic, vinyl, translucent paper, opaque paper, or
cellophane tape is acceptable.
Tab placement generated 401 responses. Commenters cited the lack of
machinery capable of applying two tabs on the leading edge and one tab
on the trailing edge of each booklet, the cost of upgrading existing
tabbing equipment, and the amount of extra space required to install
upgrades as reasons why they objected to the proposed standards for tab
placement. Three commenters stated that the tabbing systems they
purchased would become obsolete because they can only apply tabs on the
top open edges. There were 170 mailers concerned about tab size. They
objected to the introduction of minimum tab sizes that exceed one inch
because their equipment couldn't apply tabs larger than one inch.
We realize that using different size tabs on booklets, adding an
additional tab to the leading edge, and affixing them in locations that
were until now optional, will require some adjustments to customer
manufacturing processes. Some customers are already producing and
mailing booklets with the tabbing configurations required by the new
standards despite the obstacles mentioned. In addition, at least one
manufacturer of tabbing machines is advertising a unit with the
capability of tabbing mail in the proposed locations.
Mailer and controlled tests demonstrate that using 1\1/2\-inch tabs
to seal booklets in place of the smaller 1-inch tabs improved the
productivity of processing. Sorting booklets sealed with 1\1/2\-inch
tabs still reduced machine throughput compared to processing other
letter-size pieces. To improve productivity and processing, 1\1/2\-inch
tabs are required. We will continue to monitor booklet processing
performance.
The increase in the number of tabs required to seal booklets
generated 179 comments. Remarks focused on the absence of notification,
with some commenters stating that the mailings they present now are not
generating error reports from the plants that process them. As booklet
volumes increase in the mailstream, processing operations must divert
these mailings to manual or flat mail operations to avoid mailpiece
damage and machine down time. The USPS generated numerous irregularity
reports concerning poorly prepared booklets over the past several
years. These reports have documented instances of jammed machines and
torn mailpieces. Our experiences processing booklets as live mailpieces
and in a variety of controlled and customer-supplied mailpiece tests
show that the new standards are needed. Customers who observed their
own booklets being tested acknowledged that although their mail is
currently being charged automation or machinable prices, it cannot be
machine sorted.
A number of commenters stated that we did not justify the amount of
added workload applying additional tabs would impose on the customer.
Testing demonstrated that the machine throughput when processing
booklets with two 1-inch tabs on the top edge was half the throughput
for booklets with two 1\1/2\-inch tabs on the lead edge and one tab on
the trailing edge, and almost one fourth the throughput for enveloped
letter mail. Therefore, we believe this warrants the changes.
Many commenters objected to the definition of a folded self-mailer.
The definition of folded self-mailers will be refined in conjunction
with a subsequent phase of testing customer-supplied samples and will
be published at a later date as part of the changes to folded self-
mailer standards indicated by test results.
Only 31 customers expressed concerns about standards for static
charge and coefficient of friction. Some commenters wanted to know
where to buy paper that conformed to the standards while others asked
how mail would be tested for these characteristics in the acceptance
units. We recommend this requirement while further methods are explored
to measure these standards. We recommend testing your mailpieces for
static charge and coefficient of friction when possible.
Forty-nine commenters asked that we delay changing standards for
booklets and folded self-mailers until the economy turns around. We
believe that implementing standards for booklets will improve the
processing and cost effective handling of these pieces. However, we
will work with the mailing community to further refine standards for
folded self-mailers.
Some commenters wondered how they could determine if their
mailpiece was made of high tear strength paper. Paper distributors
generally recognize which of their products have high tear strength,
and most papers sold in office supply stores have adequate tear
strength. High tear strength paper has properties like a high fiber
length, a low degree of beating, and for machine-made papers, fiber
orientation. Mailpieces made of high tear strength paper can be sorted
on automated processing equipment without tearing or shattering.
Some commenters objected to the increase in required paper grade
for the covers of booklets. Paper values published in the DMM varied by
product. Our new booklet illustrations and descriptions are based on
book-grade paper. Paper grades are printed on the packaging of reams,
boxes, and rolls of paper.
The maximum weight of automation letters was a concern for some
customers. The proposal did not change the maximum allowable weight for
booklets. According to current standards in DMM 201.3.14.4, letters
that weigh more than 3 ounces must be prepared in a sealed envelope,
therefore booklets weighing more than 3 ounces must be prepared in
sealed envelopes. Our standards reflect this required mailpiece
characteristic.
Based on the results of continued testing, a modification to the
standards was published in the Federal Register on December 29, 2008,
increasing the amount of acceptable tab overhang from 1/32 of an inch
to 1/16 of an inch.
The Postal Service adopts the following changes to Mailing
Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM), incorporated by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations.
See 39 CFR 111.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
0
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is amended as follows.
PART 111--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 continues to read as
follows:
[[Page 17401]]
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414,
416, 3001-3011, 3201-3219, 3403-3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632, 3633,
and 5001.
0
2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM) as follows:
Mailing Standards of the United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail
Manual (DMM)
* * * * *
200 Commercial Mail Letters and Cards
201 Physical Standards
1.0 Physical Standards for Machinable Letters and Cards
1.1 Physical Standards for Machinable Letters
* * * * *
1.1.3 All Machinable Letters
[Revise the first sentence of 1.1.3 as follows:]
All pieces of First-Class Mail and Standard Mail machinable letters
must meet the standards for automation-compatible letters in 201.3.0. *
* *
* * * * *
3.0 Physical Standards for Automation Letters and Cards
[Revise text of 3.1 as follows:]
3.1 Basic Standards Automation Letters and Cards
Letters and cards claimed at any machinable, automation, or
Standard Mail carrier route price, must meet the standards in 3.0.
Unless prepared as a folded self-mailer, booklet, or postcard under
3.14 through 3.16, each machinable or automation letter must be a
sealed envelope (the preferred method) or, if unenveloped, must be
sealed or glued completely along all four sides.
[Delete current 3.4 through 3.6 in their entirety.]
[Renumber current 3.2 through 3.3 as new 3.3 through 3.4.]
[Add new 3.2 as follows:]
3.2 Paper Weight
Mailpieces should be constructed from high tear strength paper
stock. All references in 3.0 to paper basis weight are for book-grade
paper unless otherwise stated. The conversion table in Exhibit 3.2
provides a paper basis weight cross-reference.
Exhibit 3.2 Paper Basis Weight Conversion Table
Note: Paper basis weight is based on the weight of 500 sheets
of: 25 x 38 inch sheets of book-grade paper, 17 x 22 inch bond-grade
paper, 20 x 26 inch sheets of cover-grade paper, 24 x 36 inch sheets
of newsprint. For example, if 500 sheets of book-grade paper weigh
39 pounds, the paper is considered 39-pound book paper.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Book wt. Bond wt. Cover wt. Newsprint wt.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
39............................ 15 21 35
40............................ 16 22 36
50............................ 20 27 45
55............................ 22 30 50
60............................ 24 33 55
70............................ 28 40 64
75............................ 30 41 68
80............................ 31 44 73
90............................ 36 50 82
100........................... 40 56 91
110........................... 44 60 100
128........................... 50 70 116
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Revise heading and introductory text of renumbered 3.3 as
follows:]
3.3 Dimensions and Shape
Each machinable or automation letter-sized piece must be
rectangular (see 1.1.1) and must meet the following standards (see 3.15
for booklets):
* * * * *
[Add new 3.5 as follows:]
3.5 Maximum Weight, Machinable and Automation Letters and Cards
The following maximum weight limits apply:
a. Booklets and folded self-mailers--3 ounces.
b. Machinable enveloped letters and cards--3.3 ounces.
c. Automation enveloped letters and cards--3.5 ounces (see 3.6 for
pieces over 3 ounces.)
[Renumber current 3.14.4 as new 3.6 and revise heading and text as
follows:]
3.6 Heavy Letter Mail (Over 3 Ounces)
Heavy letter mail (letter-size pieces over 3 ounces) must be
prepared in a sealed envelope, may not contain stiff enclosures, and
must have an 11-digit delivery point POSTNET or an Intelligent Mail
barcode with a routing code in the address block (see 202.5.0).
* * * * *
[Revise heading and text of 3.11 as follows:]
3.11 Tabs, Tape, and Glue
Tabs on booklets must be at least 1\1/2\ inches in width. The tab
placement standards in 3.15 are subject to \1/4\-inch variance in
either direction. Tabs may be made of opaque paper, translucent paper,
vinyl or plastic, and must not contain perforations. Cellophane tape
may also be used as a closure. The following standards also apply:
a. Translucent paper tabs should be made of paper with a minimum of
40-pound basis weight.
b. Opaque paper tabs should be made of a minimum of 60-pound basis
weight paper with a tear strength of at least 56 grams of force in the
machine direction (MD) and 60 grams of force in the cross direction
(CD).
c. Tabs in the barcode clear zone must have a paper face meeting
the standards for background reflectance and, if the barcode is not
preprinted by the mailer, the standards for acceptance of water-based
ink.
d. Vinyl tabs and cellophane tape closures are not acceptable
within the barcode clear zone.
e. Tabs must be tight against the edge of the mailpiece. A maximum
\1/16\-inch overhang is recommended.
f. Glue spots may be used in lieu of tabs and must be placed within
\3/4\-inch of the open edges (see Exhibit 201.3.11.f).
[[Page 17402]]
Exhibit 201.3.11.f Glue Spot Placement
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15AP09.000
g. Continuous glue lines may be used as cover-to-cover seals and
must be placed along the entire length of the open edge and end no more
than \3/4\-inch from the open ends (see Exhibit 201.3.11.g).
Exhibit 201.3.11.g Glue Line Placement
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15AP09.001
* * * * *
[Revise the title of 3.14 and restructure as follows:]
3.14 Folded Self-Mailers
[Add new 3.14.1 to read as follows:]
3.14.1 General
The standards in 3.14.2 for folded self-mailers are basic
requirements.
[Renumber current 3.14.1 as new 3.14.2.]
[Renumber current 3.14.2 as new 3.15 and revise as follows:]
3.15 Booklets
3.15.1 Definition
Booklets must have a bound edge. Sheets that are fastened with at
least two staples in the manufacturing fold (saddle stitched), perfect
bound, pressed-glued, or joined together by another binding method that
produces an end where pages are attached together are considered
booklets. Booklets are open on three sides before sealing, similar in
design to a book. In general, booklets must be uniformly thick. Large
bound booklets that are folded for mailing qualify for automation and
machinable prices if the final mailpiece remains nearly uniform in
thickness.
3.15.2 Paper
Booklet covers generally must be made with a minimum paper basis
weight of 60-pounds or equivalent. Minimum basis weights are higher for
some designs (see 3.15.4).
3.15.3 Physical Standards for Booklets
Booklets must be:
a. Height: Not more than 6 inches or less than 3.5 inches high.
b. Length: Not more than 10.5 inches or less than 5 inches long.
See Exhibit 3.15.4 for some booklet designs with shorter maximum
lengths.
c. Thickness: Not more than 0.25 inch or less than 0.009 inch
thick.
d. Weight: Not more than 3 ounces.
e. Aspect ratio: Within 1.3 to 2.5 (see 201.3.1).
3.15.4 Booklet Design and Sealing
Booklets may be designed with the spine or final fold at the bottom
or on the leading edge. See Exhibit 3.15.4 for design and sealing
standards.
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[[Page 17403]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR15AP09.002
[Renumber current 3.14.3 as new 3.16.]
[Renumber current 3.14.4 as new 3.6.]
[Renumber current 3.15 as new 3.17.]
* * * * *
We will publish an appropriate amendment to 39 CFR part 111.
Stanley F. Mires,
Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E9-8532 Filed 4-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-C