Kirtland's Warbler Wildlife Management Area, Located Throughout 8 Counties in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan, 16886-16888 [E9-8380]
Download as PDF
16886
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Notices
the development and implementation of
an integrated resource management plan
for those lands and waters within the
Corridor.
The meeting will convene on May 21,
2009 at 9 a.m. at the Blackstone Valley
Regional Vocational Technical High
School, located at 65 Pleasant Street,
Upton, MA for the following reasons:
1. Approval of Minutes.
2. Chairman’s Report.
3. Executive Director’s Report.
4. Financial Budget.
5. Public Input.
It is anticipated that about thirty
people will be able to attend the session
in addition to the Commission
members.
Interested persons may make oral or
written presentations to the Commission
or file written statements. Such requests
should be made prior to the meeting to:
Jan H. Reitsma, Executive Director, John
H. Chafee, Blackstone River Valley
National Heritage Corridor Commission,
One Depot Square, Woonsocket, RI
02895, Tel.: (401) 762–0250.
Further information concerning this
meeting may be obtained from Jan H.
Reitsma, Executive Director of the
Commission at the aforementioned
address.
comments must be received on or before
4:30 p.m. on May 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be
held at the BLM North Dakota Field
Office Conference Room, 99 23rd
Avenue West, Dickinson, North Dakota.
Written comments on the FMV and
MER should be sent to the Bureau of
Land Management, Montana State
Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings,
MT 59101–4669. Written comments or
questions on the EA should be sent to
Angela Wetz, Natural Resource
Specialist, North Dakota Field Office,
Bureau of Land Management, 99 23rd
Avenue West, Dickinson, ND 58601.
Copies of the EA are available at the
North Dakota Field Office at the above
address. The EA is also available on the
Internet at https://www.blm.gov/mt/st/
en/fo/north_dakota_field.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The land
included in Coal Lease Application
NDM 97633 contains an estimated 4.1
million tons of recoverable coal
reserves. It is described as follows:
Jan H. Reitsma,
Executive Director, BRVNHCC.
[FR Doc. E9–8322 Filed 4–10–09; 8:45 am]
The EA addresses the cultural,
socioeconomic, environmental and
cumulative impacts that would likely
result from leasing these coal lands.
Two alternatives are addressed in the
EA:
Alternative 1: (Proposed Action) The
tract would be leased, as applied for.
Alternative 2: (No Action) The
application would be rejected or denied.
The Federal coal reserves would be
bypassed.
Proprietary data marked as
confidential may be submitted to the
Bureau of Land Management in
response to this solicitation of public
comments. Data so marked shall be
treated in accordance with the laws and
regulations governing the
confidentiality of such information. A
copy of the comments submitted by the
public on FMV and MER, except those
portions identified as proprietary by the
author and meeting exemptions stated
in the Freedom of Information Act, will
be available for public inspection at the
Bureau of Land Management, 5001
Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana
59101–4669, during regular business
hours (9 a.m. to 4 p.m.) Monday through
Friday. Other comments will be
available for public inspection at the
Bureau of Land Management, North
Dakota Field Office, 99 23rd Avenue
West, Dickinson, ND 58601 (9 a.m. to 4
p.m.) Monday through Friday.
BILLING CODE 4310–RK–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[LLMT921 09 L51100000.GD0000
LVEMCE280000; NDM 97633]
Notice of the Availability of the BNI
Coal, Ltd., Federal Coal Lease
Application Environmental
Assessment and Notice of Public
Hearing
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability and notice
of public hearing.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal coal management regulations at
43 CFR 3422 and 3425, the BNI Coal
Lease by Application Environmental
Assessment (EA) is available for public
review and comment. A public hearing
will be held to receive comments on the
EA and associated Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI), Fair Market
Value (FMV), and Maximum Economic
Recovery (MER) of the coal resources for
BNI Coal, Ltd.’s (BNI) Federal Coal
Lease Application NDM 97633.
DATES: The public hearing will be held
at 9 a.m. on April 30, 2009. Written
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:51 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
T. 142 N., R. 84 W., 5th P.M
Sec. 32: N2NW, SWNW, NWSW; 160.00
acres.
The land is adjacent to BNI’s Center Mine,
located in Oliver County, North Dakota.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Written comments on the FMV and
MER should address, but not necessarily
be limited to, the following:
1. The quality and quantity of the coal
resources;
2. The mining method or methods
which would achieve MER of the coal
including specifications of the seams to
be mined, timing and rate of production,
restriction to mining, and the inclusion
of the tract in an existing mining
operation;
3. The FMV appraisal including but
not limited to the evaluation of the tract
as an incremental unit of an existing
mine, selling price of the coal, mining
and reclamation costs, net present value
discount factors, depreciation and other
tax accounting factors, value of the
surface estate, and any comparable sales
data on similar coal lands. The values
given above may or may not change as
a result of comments received from the
public and changes in market
conditions between now and when final
economic evaluations are completed.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, please be aware that your
entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed
Hughes, Supervisory Industry
Economist, (406–896–5057), Bureau of
Land Management, Montana State
Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings,
Montana 59101.
Phillip C. Perlewitz,
Chief, Branch of Solid Minerals.
[FR Doc. E9–8353 Filed 4–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–$$–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–R–2009–N0036; 30136–1265–
0000–S3]
Kirtland’s Warbler Wildlife
Management Area, Located
Throughout 8 Counties in the Northern
Lower Peninsula of Michigan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Notices
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and draft
environmental assessment (EA) for
Kirtland’s Warbler Wildlife
Management Area (Kirtland’s Warbler
WMA) for public review and comment.
In this draft CCP/EA we describe how
we propose to manage Kirtland’s
Warbler WMA for the next 15 years. The
Kirtland’s Warbler WMA is part of the
National Wildlife Refuge System and is
administered by the staff of Seney
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR).
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
May 15, 2009. Special mailings,
newspaper articles, internet postings,
and other media announcements will
inform people of the opportunities to
submit written comments.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods. You may also
drop off comments in person at Seney
NWR.
• Agency Web site: View or download
a copy of the document and comment at
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Planning/
kirtland/
• E-mail: r3planning@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Kirtland’s Warbler WMA Draft
CCP/EA’’ in the subject line of the
message.
• Fax: 906–586–3800.
• Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager,
Seney National Wildlife Refuge, 1674
Refuge Entrance Road, Seney, MI 49883.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracy Casselman, 906–586–9851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Kirtland’s Warbler WMA,
which we began by publishing a notice
of intent April 21, 2006 (71 FR 20722).
For more about the initial process and
the history of this WMA, see that notice.
We established this WMA in the early
1980s due, in part, to the
recommendations of the Kirtland’s
Warbler Recovery Team. The original
goal was to acquire 7,500 acres of land
on which habitat would be managed for
the benefit of Kirtland’s warbler. At
present, the area contains 124 separate
tracts totaling 6,582 acres.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), requires us to develop a
comprehensive conservation plan for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:51 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
each national wildlife refuge and
wildlife management area. The purpose
in developing a CCP is to provide
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving wildlife management area
purposes and contributing toward the
mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System, consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, plans identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred
Alternative
Priority Issues
During the public scoping process,
we, other stakeholders and partners, and
the public identified several priority
issues, which include habitat
management, nuisance species control,
and recreation opportunities and visitor
services. To address these issues, we
developed and evaluated the following
alternatives during the planning
process.
Alternative 1: Current Management
Direction of Habitat Management (No
Action)
The current management direction of
Kirtland’s Warbler WMA would be
maintained under this alternative. For
NEPA purposes, this is referred to as the
‘‘No Action’’ alternative, a misnomer as
some changes will occur over the next
15 years. Nonetheless, in Alternative 1
intensive management of existing jack
pine stands would continue to occur in
close cooperation with the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources (DNR),
with the primary objective to produce
dense jack pine plantations for
Kirtland’s Warbler breeding habitat. The
WMA staff and Michigan DNR land
managers would continue to monitor
habitat prescription effects and make
improvements in jack pine habitat
management as it pertains primarily to
Kirtland’s Warbler. Public use would
follow the current direction and be
linked to uses of the surrounding state
lands. Environmental education and
outreach will be limited primarily to the
annual Kirtland’s Warbler Festival
events.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16887
Alternative 2: Management From an
Ecological Perspective
Alternative 2 would seek to make
changes from the current high intensity
habitat management that produces jack
pine plantations for Kirtland’s Warbler
by trenching and planting. Future
management would be from a more
ecologically broad and holistic jack pine
ecosystem management standpoint
based on benchmark conditions derived
from jack pine stands regenerated by
wildfire. This alternative would include
management practices that place a
greater emphasis on ecological integrity
and better emulating wildfire-produced
jack pine stand composition and
structural patterns and resulting
biodiversity. Timber harvests would try
to better emulate wildfire-produced
stand conditions, and a range of
regeneration options would be used,
including prescribed fire when and
where possible. An increased emphasis
would also occur within law
enforcement and visitor use.
Enforcement of hunting regulations,
trespass, and other violations would
likely require more staff time and yearround presence. Visitor use would be
facilitated by marking some properties
with signs and by outreach to
surrounding communities and users.
Alternative 3: Ecological Management
and Land Ownership Consolidation
(Preferred Alternative)
Alternative 3 would seek to manage
existing lands as suggested in
Alternative 2, but would also explore
land exchanges with the state (and
possibly U.S. Forest Service) to
consolidate state and WMA parcels.
Proposed land exchanges would likely
increase the total area of land managed
for Kirtland’s Warbler, as well as
increase management efficiency by both
federal and state agencies. Existing
lands and any new lands acquired
through exchange would be managed to
benefit the Kirtland’s Warbler and other
native flora and fauna of jack pine
ecosystems. However, jack pine stand
management would be shifted towards a
more ecologically-based approach rather
than the highly intensive manner of
present habitat management that
produces jack pine plantations. For
instance, if consolidation would occur
and the Service would obtain upland
jack pine stands in the eastern Upper
Peninsula, prescribed fire would be a
more likely management tool.
Public Input
We will give the public an
opportunity to provide comments upon
release of the draft plan. You may
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
16888
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Notices
submit comments anytime during the
comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should know that your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. E9–8380 Filed 4–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
General Management Plan; Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park Hawaii;
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement
SUMMARY: In accord with section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.), the National Park Service (NPS) is
undertaking a conservation planning
and environmental impact analysis
process for updating the General
Management Plan (GMP) for Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park. The new GMP
will include a wilderness eligibility
assessment for the recently accessioned
Kahuku District to evaluate if lands are
potentially eligible for wilderness
designation, as required by NPS
Management Policies 2006 for newly
acquired lands. The GMP will also
outline a commercial services strategy to
identify the appropriate role of
commercial operators in helping the
park provide opportunities for visitor
use and enjoyment. An Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared
concurrently with the GMP. The GMP is
intended to set forth the basic
management philosophy for this unit of
the National Park System and provide
the strategies for addressing issues and
achieving identified management
objectives for that unit. The GMP serves
as a ‘‘blueprint’’ to guide management of
natural and cultural resources and
visitor use during the next 15–20 years.
One or more development concept
plans, which guide more detailed, sitespecific preservation and development,
may also be included with the GMP.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:51 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
Consistent with NPS Planning
Program Standards, the updated GMP
will: (1) Describe the park’s purpose,
significance, and primary interpretive
themes; (2) identify the fundamental
resources and values of the park, its
other important resources and values,
and describe the condition of these
resources; (3) describe desired
conditions for cultural and natural
resources and visitor experiences
throughout the park; (4) develop
management zoning to support these
desired conditions; (5) develop
alternative applications of these
management zones to the park’s
landscape (i.e. zoning alternatives); (6)
address user capacity; (7) analyze
potential boundary modifications; (8)
ensure that management
recommendations are developed in
consultation with interested
stakeholders and the public and
adopted by NPS leadership after an
adequate analysis of the benefits,
environmental impacts, and economic
costs of alternative courses of action; (9)
develop cost estimates implementing
each of the alternatives; and (10)
identify and prioritize subsequent
detailed studies, plans and actions
needed to implement the updated GMP.
Scoping Process: The purpose of
scoping outreach efforts is to elicit early
public comment regarding issues and
concerns, the nature and extent of
potential environmental impacts (and as
appropriate, mitigation measures), and
preliminary alternatives which should
be considered for the plan update.
Through the outreach activities planned
in the scoping phase, the NPS welcomes
information and suggestions from the
public regarding resource protection,
visitor use, and land management. This
notice formally initiates the public
scoping comment phase for the EIS
process. Questions to be asked during
public scoping include: (1) What do you
value most about Hawaii Volcanoes
National Park? (2) What do you think
are the important issues facing the park?
(3) Imagine you are visiting Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park 20 years from
now: Describe what you would like to
experience. (4) Do you feel that the
purpose and significance statements
capture the essence of Hawaii Volcanoes
National Park? (5) Other comments or
concerns you would like to share?
All scoping comments must be
postmarked or transmitted no later than
June 30, 2009. You may submit your
comments electronically through the
NPS Planning, Environment and Public
Comment Web site https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/havo (select the
General Management Plan from the list
of projects). If it is more convenient, or
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
if you do not have access to a computer,
you can hand-deliver your comments
(see below) or send your written
comments to: General Management
Plan, Hawaii Volcanoes National Park,
Attn: Cindy Orlando, Superintendent,
Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, P.O.
Box 52, Hawaii National Park, HI
96718–0052.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Starting in late April a series of open
houses will be hosted on Hawaii Island
(including Hilo, Volcano, Naalehu and
Kailua-Kona), one on Maui, and one on
Oahu in Honolulu. Detailed information
including times and specific locations
for these meetings will be posted on the
GMP Web site https://www.nps.gov/
havo/parkmgmt/plan.htm. All attendees
will be given the opportunity to ask
questions and provide comments to the
planning team. The GMP Web site will
provide the most up-to-date information
regarding the project, including project
description, planning process updates,
meeting notices, reports and documents,
and useful links associated with the
project.
Hawaii
Volcanoes National Park (park) was
established in 1916 and is operating
with a 30-plus year-old Master Plan
written in 1975. Numerous major
changes have occurred in NPS
management, policy, land ownership,
and practices that directly affect the
park. The park needs a comprehensive
management document that will address
these changes and further develop
strategies to protect, maintain or restore
resources and address visitor access,
services, and development. The
following issues are among those to be
addressed in updating the GMP:
Park Visitation and Visitor
Facilities—Approximately 1.6 million
people visit the park each year. Since
1983, lava flows have destroyed a
number of facilities including a visitor
center, campground, ranger residences,
and have covered cultural sites, trails,
and miles of highway. Changes in
volcanic activity and gas emissions
require creative management to protect
visitor health and safety, while
encouraging access and promoting
outstanding visitor experiences.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16886-16888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8380]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-R-2009-N0036; 30136-1265-0000-S3]
Kirtland's Warbler Wildlife Management Area, Located Throughout 8
Counties in the Northern Lower Peninsula of Michigan
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 16887]]
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and draft
environmental assessment (EA) for Kirtland's Warbler Wildlife
Management Area (Kirtland's Warbler WMA) for public review and comment.
In this draft CCP/EA we describe how we propose to manage Kirtland's
Warbler WMA for the next 15 years. The Kirtland's Warbler WMA is part
of the National Wildlife Refuge System and is administered by the staff
of Seney National Wildlife Refuge (NWR).
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by May 15, 2009. Special mailings, newspaper articles, internet
postings, and other media announcements will inform people of the
opportunities to submit written comments.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods. You may also drop off comments in person at
Seney NWR.
Agency Web site: View or download a copy of the document
and comment at https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Planning/kirtland/
E-mail: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ``Kirtland's Warbler
WMA Draft CCP/EA'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 906-586-3800.
Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Seney National Wildlife
Refuge, 1674 Refuge Entrance Road, Seney, MI 49883.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracy Casselman, 906-586-9851.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Kirtland's
Warbler WMA, which we began by publishing a notice of intent April 21,
2006 (71 FR 20722). For more about the initial process and the history
of this WMA, see that notice.
We established this WMA in the early 1980s due, in part, to the
recommendations of the Kirtland's Warbler Recovery Team. The original
goal was to acquire 7,500 acres of land on which habitat would be
managed for the benefit of Kirtland's warbler. At present, the area
contains 124 separate tracts totaling 6,582 acres.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), requires us to develop a comprehensive
conservation plan for each national wildlife refuge and wildlife
management area. The purpose in developing a CCP is to provide managers
with a 15-year strategy for achieving wildlife management area purposes
and contributing toward the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge
System, consistent with sound principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal mandates, and our policies. In addition
to outlining broad management direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, plans identify wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public, including opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and
environmental education and interpretation.
CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative
Priority Issues
During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and
partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which
include habitat management, nuisance species control, and recreation
opportunities and visitor services. To address these issues, we
developed and evaluated the following alternatives during the planning
process.
Alternative 1: Current Management Direction of Habitat Management (No
Action)
The current management direction of Kirtland's Warbler WMA would be
maintained under this alternative. For NEPA purposes, this is referred
to as the ``No Action'' alternative, a misnomer as some changes will
occur over the next 15 years. Nonetheless, in Alternative 1 intensive
management of existing jack pine stands would continue to occur in
close cooperation with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
(DNR), with the primary objective to produce dense jack pine
plantations for Kirtland's Warbler breeding habitat. The WMA staff and
Michigan DNR land managers would continue to monitor habitat
prescription effects and make improvements in jack pine habitat
management as it pertains primarily to Kirtland's Warbler. Public use
would follow the current direction and be linked to uses of the
surrounding state lands. Environmental education and outreach will be
limited primarily to the annual Kirtland's Warbler Festival events.
Alternative 2: Management From an Ecological Perspective
Alternative 2 would seek to make changes from the current high
intensity habitat management that produces jack pine plantations for
Kirtland's Warbler by trenching and planting. Future management would
be from a more ecologically broad and holistic jack pine ecosystem
management standpoint based on benchmark conditions derived from jack
pine stands regenerated by wildfire. This alternative would include
management practices that place a greater emphasis on ecological
integrity and better emulating wildfire-produced jack pine stand
composition and structural patterns and resulting biodiversity. Timber
harvests would try to better emulate wildfire-produced stand
conditions, and a range of regeneration options would be used,
including prescribed fire when and where possible. An increased
emphasis would also occur within law enforcement and visitor use.
Enforcement of hunting regulations, trespass, and other violations
would likely require more staff time and year-round presence. Visitor
use would be facilitated by marking some properties with signs and by
outreach to surrounding communities and users.
Alternative 3: Ecological Management and Land Ownership Consolidation
(Preferred Alternative)
Alternative 3 would seek to manage existing lands as suggested in
Alternative 2, but would also explore land exchanges with the state
(and possibly U.S. Forest Service) to consolidate state and WMA
parcels. Proposed land exchanges would likely increase the total area
of land managed for Kirtland's Warbler, as well as increase management
efficiency by both federal and state agencies. Existing lands and any
new lands acquired through exchange would be managed to benefit the
Kirtland's Warbler and other native flora and fauna of jack pine
ecosystems. However, jack pine stand management would be shifted
towards a more ecologically-based approach rather than the highly
intensive manner of present habitat management that produces jack pine
plantations. For instance, if consolidation would occur and the Service
would obtain upland jack pine stands in the eastern Upper Peninsula,
prescribed fire would be a more likely management tool.
Public Input
We will give the public an opportunity to provide comments upon
release of the draft plan. You may
[[Page 16888]]
submit comments anytime during the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should know
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. E9-8380 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P