Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Opportunity for Comment, 16815-16823 [E9-8262]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Background and Purpose
We published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register on February 12, 2009 (74 FR
7022), entitled ‘‘Regulated Navigation
Areas; Bars Along the Coasts of Oregon
and Washington.’’ In it we stated that
we did not plan to hold a public
meeting, but that we welcomed requests
explaining why one would be beneficial
(74 FR 7023). We received several such
requests and have concluded that a
public meeting would aid this
rulemaking. Therefore, we are
publishing this notice.
In the NPRM, we propose to establish
Regulated Navigation Areas (RNA)
covering specific bars along the coasts of
Oregon and Washington that will
include procedures for restricting and/
or closing those bars as well as
additional safety requirements for
recreational and small commercial
vessels operating in the RNAs. The
RNAs are necessary to help ensure the
safety of the persons and vessels
operating in those hazardous bar areas.
The RNAs will do so by establishing
clear procedures for restricting and/or
closing the bars and mandating
additional safety requirements for
recreational and small commercial
vessels operating in the RNAs when
certain conditions exist.
You may view the NPRM in our
online docket, in addition to supporting
documents prepared by the Coast
Guard, including an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Checklist’’ and RNA Fact
Sheets for recreational, passenger, and
commercial fishing vessels, and
comments submitted thus far by going
to https://www.regulations.gov. Once
there, select the Advanced Docket
Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG–2008–1017 in the
Docket ID box, press Enter, and then
click on the item in the Docket ID
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments either orally at the meetings
or in writing. If you bring written
comments to the meetings, you may
submit them to Coast Guard personnel
specified at the meetings to receive
written comments. These comments
will be submitted to our online public
docket. All comments received will be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Comments submitted after the
meetings must reach the Coast Guard on
or before April 19, 2009. If you submit
a comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Information on Service for Individuals
With Disabilities
For information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request special assistance at the
public meeting, contact LCDR Emily
Saddler at the telephone number or
e-mail address indicated under the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
Public Meeting
The Coast Guard will hold a public
meeting regarding its ‘‘Regulated
Navigation Areas; Bars Along the Coasts
of Oregon and Washington’’ proposed
rule on Tuesday, April 14, 2009, from
6 p.m. to 9 p.m, at The Loft at the Red
Building, 20 Basin Street, Astoria, OR
97103, telephone 503–325–2223, and on
Wednesday, April 15, 2009, from 6 p.m.
to 9 p.m., at The Embarcadero Resort
Hotel & Marina, 1000 SE Bay Blvd.,
Newport, OR 97365, telephone 541–
265–8521 or 1–800–547–4779.
We plan to have an official transcript
of the meetings prepared and will make
that transcript available through a link
in our online docket.
Dated: March, 30, 2009.
J.P. Currier,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9–8266 Filed 4–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16815
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 612
RIN 3145–AA52
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Opportunity for Comment
National Science Foundation.
Notice of proposed rulemaking
and opportunity for comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document sets forth
proposed revisions of the Foundation’s
regulations under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). The new FOIA
provisions implement the Openness
Promotes Effectiveness in our National
Government Act of 2007, or the OPEN
Government Act of 2007, Public Law
110–175.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
May 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this proposed rule to the
Office of the General Counsel, National
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA
22230. You may also send comments by
facsimile transmission to (703) 292–
9041, or send them electronically
through the Federal Government’s onestop rulemaking Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie A. Jensen, Legal Analyst, Office of
the General Counsel, National Science
Foundation, telephone 703–292–8060
and e-mail ljensen@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Records and
Information (45 CFR part 612) (FOIA
Regulations)
This revision of part 612 implements
the new provisions of the Openness
Promotes Effectiveness in our National
Government Act of 2007, or the OPEN
Government Act of 2007, Public Law
110–175. No changes to the Act’s nine
exemptions were made. The
amendments address a range of
procedural issues impacting FOIA
administration, including the
codification of several provisions of
Executive Order 13392, Improving
Agency Disclosure of Information.
Clarifications or minor procedural
changes are found at § 612.3(a), (b), (f)
and (g) (Requirements for making
requests), § 612.4(a) (Responding to
requests), § 612.5 (c)(1) and (2) (Timing
of Response to Requests), § 612.6 (a), (b),
(c)(1) (Processing requests) and
§ 612.10(c)(iii) (Fees).
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the
proposed rule will not have a significant
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
16816
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities; the proposed rule
addresses the procedures to be followed
when submitting or responding to
requests for information under the
Freedom of Information Act. For
purposes of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) the
proposed rule would not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments and
would not result in increased
expenditures by State, local, and tribal
governments, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more. For purposes of
Executive Order 12866, the proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action
requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget. For the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) it has been
determined that this proposed
rulemaking does not impose any
reporting or recordkeeping requirement
on the public.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 612
Administrative practice and
procedure: Freedom of information.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the National Science
Foundation proposes to amend 45 CFR
chapter VI by revising part 612 as
follows:
PART 612—AVAILABILITY OF
RECORDS AND INFORMATION
Sec.
612.1
612.2
612.3
612.4
612.5
612.6
612.7
612.8
612.9
612.10
612.11
General provisions.
Public reading room.
Requirements for making requests.
Responding to requests.
Timing of responses to requests.
Processing requests.
Exemptions.
Business information.
Appeals.
Fees.
Other rights and services.
General provisions.
This part contains the rules that the
National Science Foundation follows in
processing requests for records under
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),
5 U.S.C. 552. Information routinely
made available to the public as part of
a regular Foundation activity (for
example, program announcements and
solicitations, summary of awarded
proposals, statistical reports on U.S.
science, news releases) may be provided
to the public without reliance on this
part. As a matter of policy, the
Foundation also makes discretionary
disclosures of records or information
otherwise exempt under the FOIA
whenever disclosure would not
foreseeably harm an interest protected
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
§ 612.2
Public reading room.
(a) The Foundation maintains a public
reading room located in the NSF Library
at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 225,
Arlington, Virginia, open during regular
working hours Monday through Friday.
It contains the records that the FOIA
requires to be made regularly available
for public inspection and copying and
has computers and printers available for
public use in accessing records. Also
available for public inspection and
copying are current subject matter
indexes of reading room records.
(b) Information about FOIA and
Privacy at NSF and copies of frequently
requested FOIA releases are available
Online at https://www.nsf.gov/pubinfo/
foia.html. Most NSF policy documents,
staff instructions, manuals, and other
publications that affect a member of the
public, are available in electronic form
through the ‘‘Documents’’ option on the
tool bar on NSF’s Home Page on the
Internet at https://www.nsf.gov.
§ 612.3
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.
§ 612.1
by a FOIA exemption. This policy,
however, does not create any right
enforceable in court. When individuals
seek records about themselves under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, NSF
processes those requests under both
NSF’s Privacy regulations at part 613,
and this part.
Requirements for making requests.
(a) Where to send a request. The
National Science Foundation has one
Agency component. You may make a
FOIA request for records of the National
Science Foundation by writing directly
to the FOIA Officer, Office of the
General Counsel, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. For
records maintained by the NSF Office of
the Inspector General (OIG), a
designated Agency component, you may
write directly to the Office of Inspector
General, National Science Foundation,
4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1135,
Arlington, VA 22230. The Agency FOIA
officer and the OIG component will also
forward requests as appropriate.
Requests may also be sent by facsimile
to the Agency FOIA Officer on (703)
292–9041 or by e-mail to foia@nsf.gov;
or, as appropriate to the OIG component
via Fax on (703) 292–9158.
(b) Form of request. A FOIA request
need not be in any particular format, but
it must be in writing, include the
requester’s name and mailing address,
and be clearly identified both on the
envelope and in the letter, or in a
facsimile or electronic mail message as
a Freedom of Information Act or
‘‘FOIA’’ request. It must describe the
records sought with sufficient
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
specificity to permit identification, and
include agreement to pay applicable
fees chargeable under the Foundation’s
fee schedule as described in § 612.10.
(c)(1) If you are making a request for
records about yourself and the records
are not contained in a Privacy Act
system of records, your request will be
processed only under the FOIA, since
the Privacy Act does not apply. If the
records about you are contained in a
Privacy Act system of records, NSF will
respond with information on how to
make a Privacy Act request (see NSF
Privacy Act regulations at 45 CFR
613.2).
(2) If you are making a request for
personal information about another
individual, either a written
authorization signed by that individual
in accordance with § 613.2(f) permitting
disclosure of those records to you, or
proof that that individual is deceased
(for example, a copy of a death
certificate or a published obituary) will
help the agency process your request.
(d) Description of records sought.
Your request must describe the records
that you seek in enough detail to enable
NSF personnel to locate them with a
reasonable amount of effort. A record
must have been created or obtained by
NSF and under the control of NSF at the
time of the request to be subject to the
FOIA. NSF has no obligation under the
FOIA to create, compile or obtain a
record to satisfy a FOIA request.
Whenever possible, your request should
include specific descriptive information
about each record sought, such as the
date, title or name, author, recipient,
and subject matter of the record. As a
general rule, the more specific you are
about the records or type of records that
you want, the more likely the
Foundation will be able to locate those
records in response to your request, and
the more likely fees will be reduced or
eliminated. If NSF determines that your
request does not reasonably describe
records, you will be advised what
additional information is needed to
perfect your request or why your request
is otherwise insufficient.
(e) Agreement to pay fees. Your
request must state that you will
promptly pay the total fees chargeable
under this regulation or set a maximum
amount you are willing to pay. NSF
does not charge if fees total less than
$25.00. If you seek a waiver of fees,
please see § 612.10(k) for a discussion of
the factors you must address. If you
place an inadequate limit on the amount
you will pay, or have failed to make
payments for previous requests, NSF
may require advance payment (see
§ 612.10(i)).
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(f) Receipt date. A request that meets
the requirements of this section will be
considered received on the date it is
received by the Office of the General
Counsel or the Office of the Inspector
General. In determining which records
are responsive to a FOIA request, the
Foundation will include only records in
its possession as of the date the search
begins.
(g) Publications excluded. For the
purpose of public requests for records
the term ‘‘record’’ does not include
publications which are available to the
public in the Federal Register, or by sale
or free distribution. NSF publications
are available in print. To request one or
more print publications (https://
www.nsf.gov/publications/obtain.jsp),
you may:
(1) Fill out Web-based order form.
https://www.nsf.gov/publications/
orderpub.jsp.
(2) Contact NSF Publications at (703)
292–PUBS (7827).
(3) Send a letter with the publication
number(s) clearly stated to: NSF
Publications, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite P–60, Arlington, VA 22230.
§ 612.4
Responding to requests.
(a) Monitoring of requests. The NSF
Office of the General Counsel (OGC), or
such other office as may be designated
by the Director, will serve as the central
office for administering these
regulations. For records maintained by
the Office of Inspector General, that
Office will control incoming requests
made directly or referred to it, dispatch
response letters, and maintain
administrative records. For all other
records maintained by NSF, OGC (or
such other office as may be designated
by the Director) will control incoming
requests, assign them to appropriate
action offices, monitor compliance,
consult with action offices on
disclosure, approve necessary
extensions, dispatch denial and other
letters, and maintain administrative
records.
(b) Consultations and referrals. When
the Foundation receives a request for a
record in its possession that originated
with another agency or in which
another agency has a substantial
interest, it may decide that the other
agency of the Federal Government is
better able to determine whether the
record should or should not be released
under the FOIA.
(1) If the Foundation determines that
it is the agency best able to process the
record in response to the request, then
it will do so, after consultation with the
other interested agencies where
appropriate.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
(2) If it determines that it is not the
agency best able to process the record,
then it will refer the request regarding
that record (or portion of the record) to
the agency that originated or has a
substantial interest in the record in
question (but only if that agency is
subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the
agency that originated a record will be
presumed to be best able to determine
whether to disclose it.
(c) Notice of referral. Whenever the
Foundation refers all or any part of the
responsibility for responding to a
request to another agency, it ordinarily
will notify the requester of the referral
and inform the requester of the name of
each agency to which the request has
been referred and of the part of the
request that has been referred, unless
such notification would disclose
information otherwise exempt.
§ 612.5
Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. NSF ordinarily will
initiate processing of requests according
to their order of receipt.
(b) Time for response. The
Foundation will make reasonable effort
to act on a request within 20 days of
when a request is received by the OGC
or the OIG or perfected (excluding the
date of receipt, weekends, and legal
holidays). A request is perfected when
you have reasonably described the
records sought under § 612.3(d), agreed
to pay fees chargeable under § 612.3(c),
or otherwise met the fee requirements
under § 612.10.
(c) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where
the time limits for processing a request
cannot be met because of ‘‘unusual
circumstances’’ as defined in the FOIA,
the FOIA Officer or the OIG component
will notify the requester as soon as
practicable in writing of the unusual
circumstances and may extend the
response period for up to ten working
days.
(2) Where the extension is for more
than ten working days, the FOIA Officer
or the OIG component will provide the
requester with an opportunity either to
modify the request so that it may be
processed within the time limits or to
arrange an agreed upon alternative time
period with the FOIA Officer or the OIG
component for processing the request or
a modified request.
(d) Expedited processing. (1) If you
want to receive expedited processing
you must submit a statement, certified
to be true and correct to the best of your
knowledge and belief, explaining in
detail the basis for requesting expedited
processing.
(2) Requests and appeals will be given
expedited treatment whenever it is
determined that a requester has
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16817
demonstrated compelling need by
presenting:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of
expedited treatment could reasonably be
expected to pose an imminent threat to
the life or physical safety of an
individual; or
(ii) An urgency to inform the public
about an actual or alleged Federal
government activity, if made by a
person primarily engaged in
disseminating information.
For example, a requester who is not
a full-time member of the news media
must establish that he or she is a person
whose main professional activity or
occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his
or her sole occupation. Such requester
also must establish a particular urgency
to inform the public about the
government activity involved in the
request, beyond the public’s right to
know about government activity
generally, and that the information
sought has particular value that would
be lost if not disseminated quickly.
(3) Within ten calendar days of receipt
of a request for expedited processing,
the FOIA Officer or OIG component will
decide whether to grant it, and will
notify the requester of the decision
orally or in writing. If a request for
expedited treatment is granted, the
request will be processed as soon as
practicable. If a request for expedited
processing is denied, any appeal of that
decision will be acted on expeditiously.
§ 612.6
Processing requests.
(a) Acknowledgment of requests. Each
request is assigned a tracking number
and the requester is advised of this
FOIA number, the receipt date and the
estimated date of action on the request.
(b) Grants of requests. Once the
Foundation makes a determination to
grant a request in whole or in part, it
will notify the requester in writing. The
Foundation will inform the requester in
the notice of any applicable fee and will
disclose records to the requester
promptly on payment of applicable fees.
Records disclosed in part will be
marked or annotated to show both the
amount, the location and the FOIA
Exemption under which the deletion is
made.
(c) Denials of requests. (1) Denials of
FOIA requests will be made by the
Office of the General Counsel, the Office
of the Inspector General, or such other
office as may be designated by the
Director. The response letter will briefly
set forth the reasons for the denial,
including any FOIA exemption(s)
applied by the Foundation or the OIG in
denying the request. It will also provide
the name and title or position of the
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
16818
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
person responsible for the denial, will
inform the requester of the right to
appeal, and will, where appropriate,
include an estimate of the volume of
any requested materials withheld. An
estimate need not be provided when the
volume is otherwise indicated through
deletions on records disclosed in part,
or if providing an estimate would harm
an interest protected by an applicable
exemption.
(2) Requesters can appeal an agency
determination to withhold all or part of
any requested record; a determination
that a requested record does not exist or
cannot be located; a determination that
what has been requested is not a record
subject to the Act; a disapproval of a fee
category claim by a requester; denial of
a fee waiver or reduction; or a denial of
a request for expedited treatment (see
§ 612.9).
§ 612.7
Exemptions.
(a) Exemptions from disclosure. The
following types of records or
information may be withheld as exempt
in full or in part from mandatory public
disclosure:
(1) Exemption 1—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1).
Records specifically authorized and
properly classified pursuant to
Executive Order to be kept secret in the
interest of national defense or foreign
policy. NSF does not have classifying
authority and normally does not deal
with classified materials.
(2) Exemption 2—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2).
Records related solely to the internal
personnel rules and practices of NSF.
This exemption primarily protects
information that if released would allow
the recipient to circumvent a statute or
agency regulation. Administrative
information such as rules relating to the
work hours, leave, and working
conditions of NSF personnel, or similar
matters, can be disclosed to the extent
that no harm would be caused to the
functions to which the information
pertains. Examples of records exempt
from disclosure include, but are not
limited to:
(i) Operating rules, guidelines,
manuals on internal procedure,
schedules and methods utilized by NSF
investigators, inspectors, auditors and
examiners.
(ii) Negotiating positions or limits at
least until the execution of a contract
(including a grant or cooperative
agreement) or the completion of the
action to which the negotiating
positions were applicable. They may
also be exempt pursuant to other
provisions of this section.
(iii) Information relating to position
management and manpower utilization,
such as internal staffing plans,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
authorizations or controls, or involved
in determination of the qualifications of
candidates for employment,
advancement, or promotion including
examination questions and answers.
(iv) Computer software, the release of
which would allow circumvention of a
statute or NSF rules, regulations, orders,
manuals, directives, instructions, or
procedures; or the integrity and security
of data systems.
(3) Exemption 3—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3).
Records specifically exempted from
disclosure by another statute that either
requires that the information be
withheld in such a way that the agency
has no discretion in the matter; or
establishes particular criteria for
withholding or refers to particular types
of information to be withheld. Examples
of records exempt from disclosure
include, but are not limited to:
(i) Trade secrets, processes,
operations, style of work, or apparatus;
or the confidential statistical data, type,
amount, or source of any income,
profits, losses, or expenditures of any
person, firm, partnership, corporation or
association, 18 U.S.C. 1905;
(ii) Records that disclose any
invention in which the Federal
Government owns or may own a right,
title, or interest (including a
nonexclusive license), 35 U.S.C. 205;
(iii) Contractor proposals not
specifically set forth or incorporated by
reference into a contract, 41 U.S.C.
253b(m);
(iv) Information protected by the
Procurement Integrity Act, 41 U.S.C.
423.
(4) Exemption 4—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).
Trade secrets and commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person, and privileged or confidential.
Information subject to this exemption is
that customarily held in confidence by
the originator(s), including nonprofit
organizations and their employees.
Release of such information is likely to
cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the originator or
submitter, or impair the Foundation’s
ability to obtain such information in the
future. NSF will process information
potentially exempted from disclosure by
Exemption 4 under § 612.8. Examples of
information exempt from disclosure
include, but are not limited to:
(i) Information received in
confidence, such as grant applications,
fellowship applications, and research
proposals prior to award;
(ii) Confidential scientific and
manufacturing processes or
developments, and technical, scientific,
statistical data or other information
developed by a grantee.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Technical, scientific, or statistical
data, and commercial or financial
information privileged or received in
confidence from an existing or potential
contractor or subcontractor, in
connection with bids, proposals, or
contracts, concerning contract
performance, income, profits, losses,
and expenditures, as well as trade
secrets, inventions, discoveries, or other
proprietary data. When the provisions of
41 U.S.C. 253b(m) or 41 U.S.C. 423 are
met, certain proprietary and source
selection information may also be
withheld under Exemption 3.
(iv) Confidential proprietary
information submitted on a voluntary
basis.
(v) Statements or information
collected in the course of inspections,
investigations, or audits, when such
statements are received in confidence
from the individual and retained in
confidence because they reveal trade
secrets or commercial or financial
information normally considered
confidential or privileged.
(5) Exemption 5—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5).
Inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda
or letters which would not be available
by law to a private party in litigation
with NSF. Factual material contained in
such records will be considered for
release if it can be reasonably segregated
and is not otherwise exempt. Examples
of records exempt from disclosure
include, but are not limited to:
(i) Reports, memoranda,
correspondence, work papers, minutes
of meetings, and staff papers, containing
evaluations, advice, opinions,
suggestions, or other deliberative
material that are prepared for use within
NSF or within the Executive Branch of
the Government by agency personnel
and others acting in a consultant or
advisory capacity;
(ii) Advance information on proposed
NSF plans to procure, lease, or
otherwise acquire, or dispose of
materials, real estate, facilities, services
or functions, when such information
would provide undue or unfair
competitive advantage to private
interests or impede legitimate
government functions;
(iii) Trade secret or other confidential
research development, or commercial
information owned by the Government,
where premature release is likely to
affect the Government’s negotiating
position or other commercial interest;
(iv) Records prepared for use in
proceedings before any Federal or State
court or administrative body;
(v) Evaluations of and comments on
specific grant applications, research
projects or proposals, or potential
contractors and their products, whether
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
made by NSF personnel or by external
reviewers acting either individually or
in panels, committees or similar groups;
(vi) Preliminary, draft or unapproved
documents, such as opinions,
recommendations, evaluations,
decisions, or studies conducted or
supported by NSF;
(vii) Proposed budget requests, and
supporting projections used or arising in
the preparation and/or execution of a
budget; proposed annual and multi-year
policy, priorities, program and financial
plan and supporting papers;
(viii) Those portions of official reports
of inspection, reports of the Inspector
General, audits, investigations, or
surveys pertaining to safety, security, or
the internal management,
administration, or operation of NSF,
when these records have traditionally
been treated by the courts as privileged
against disclosure in litigation.
(6) Exemption 6—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6).
Personnel and medical files and similar
files, the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy. The
exemption applies to living persons and
to family members of a deceased person
identified in a record. Information in
such files which is not otherwise
exempt from disclosure pursuant to
other provisions of this section will be
released to the subject or to his
designated legal representative, and may
be disclosed to others with the subject’s
written consent. Examples of records
exempt from disclosure include, but are
not limited to:
(i) Reports, records, and other
materials pertaining to individual cases
in which disciplinary or other
administrative action has been or may
be taken. Opinions and orders resulting
from those administrative or
disciplinary proceedings shall be
disclosed without identifying details if
used, cited, or relied upon as precedent.
(ii) Records compiled to evaluate or
adjudicate the suitability of candidates
for employment, and the eligibility of
individuals (civilian or contractor
employees) for security clearances, or
for access to classified information.
(iii) Reports and evaluations which
reflect upon the qualifications or
competence of individuals.
(iv) Personal information such as
home addresses and telephone and
facsimiles numbers, private e-mail
addresses, social security numbers,
dates of birth, marital status and the
like.
(v) The exemption also applies when
the fact of the existence or nonexistence
of a responsive record would itself
reveal personally private information,
and the public interest in disclosure is
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
not sufficient to outweigh the privacy
interest.
(7) Exemption 7—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7).
Records or information compiled for
civil or criminal law enforcement
purposes, including the implementation
of Executive Orders or regulations
issued pursuant to law. This exemption
may exempt from mandatory disclosure
records not originally created, but later
gathered, for law enforcement purposes.
(i) This exemption applies only to the
extent that the production of such law
enforcement records or information:
(A) Could reasonably be expected to
interfere with enforcement proceedings;
(B) Would deprive a person of the
right to a fair trial or an impartial
adjudication;
(C) Could reasonably be expected to
constitute an unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy of a living person, or
family members of a deceased person
identified in a record;
(D) Could reasonably be expected to
disclose the identity of a confidential
source, including a source within the
Federal Government, or a State, local, or
foreign agency or authority, or any
private institution, that furnished
information on a confidential basis; and
information furnished by a confidential
source and obtained by a criminal law
enforcement authority in a criminal
investigation;
(E) Would disclose techniques and
procedures for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions, or would
disclose guidelines for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions if such
disclosure could reasonably be expected
to risk circumvention of the law, or
(F) Could reasonably be expected to
endanger the life or physical safety of
any individual.
(ii) Examples of records exempt from
disclosure include, but are not limited
to:
(A) The identity and statements of
complainants or witnesses, or other
material developed during the course of
an investigation and all materials
prepared in connection with related
government litigation or adjudicative
proceedings;
(B) The identity of firms or
individuals investigated for alleged
irregularities involving NSF grants,
contracts or other matters when no
indictment has been obtained, no civil
action has been filed against them by
the United States, or no governmentwide public suspension or debarment
has occurred.
(C) Information obtained in
confidence, expressed or implied, in the
course of a criminal investigation by the
NSF Officer of the Inspector General.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16819
(iii) The exclusions contained in 5
U.S.C. 552(c)(1) and (2) may also apply
to these records.
(8) Exemption 8—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8).
Records contained in or related to
examination, operating, or condition
reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for
the use of any agency responsible for the
regulation or supervision of financial
institutions.
(9) Exemption 9—5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9).
Records containing geological and
geophysical information and data,
including maps, concerning wells.
(b) Deletion of exempt portions and
identifying details. Any reasonably
segregable portion of a record will be
provided to requesters after deletion of
the portions which are exempt.
Whenever any final opinion, order, or
other materials required to be made
available relates to a private party or
parties and the release of the name(s) or
other identifying details will constitute
a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy, the record shall be
published or made available with such
identifying details left blank, or shall be
published or made available with
obviously fictitious substitutes and with
a notification such as the following:
Names of parties and certain other
identifying details have been removed
(and fictitious names substituted) in
order to prevent a clearly unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of the
individuals involved.
§ 612.8
Business information.
(a) In general. Business information
obtained by the Foundation from a
submitter of that information will be
disclosed under the FOIA only under
this section’s procedures.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Business Information means
commercial or financial information
obtained by the Foundation from a
submitter that may be protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the
FOIA and § 612.7(a)(4).
(2) Submitter means any person or
entity from whom the Foundation
obtains business information, directly or
indirectly. The term includes
corporations; state, local, and tribal
governments; and foreign governments.
(c) Designation of business
information. A submitter of business
information must use good faith efforts
to designate, by appropriate markings,
either at the time of submission or at a
reasonable time thereafter, any portions
of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4. These designations will
expire ten years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
16820
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
requests, and provides justification for,
a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. The
Foundation will provide a submitter
with prompt written notice of a FOIA
request or administrative appeal that
seeks its business information wherever
required under this section, in order to
give the submitter an opportunity to
object to disclosure of any specified
portion of that information under
paragraph (f) of this section. The notice
shall either describe the business
information requested or include copies
of the requested records or record
portions containing the information.
(e) Where notice is required. Notice
will be given to a submitter wherever:
(1) The information has been
designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(2) The Foundation has reason to
believe that the information may be
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure.
NSF will allow a submitter a reasonable
time, consistent with statutory
requirements, to respond to the notice
described in paragraph (d) of this
section. If a submitter has any objection
to disclosure, it must submit a detailed
written statement. The statement must
specify all grounds for withholding any
portion of the information under any
exemption of the FOIA and, in the case
of Exemption 4, must show why the
information is a trade secret, or
commercial or financial information
that is privileged or confidential. In the
event that a submitter fails to respond
within the time specified in the notice,
the submitter will be considered to have
no objection to disclosure of the
information. Information provided by a
submitter under this paragraph may
itself be a record subject to disclosure
under the FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. The
Foundation will consider a submitter’s
objections and specific grounds for
nondisclosure in deciding whether to
disclose business information.
Whenever it decides to disclose
business information over the objection
of a submitter, the Foundation will give
the submitter written notice, which will
include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why
the submitter’s disclosure objections
were not sustained;
(2) A description of the business
information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which
will be a reasonable time subsequent to
the notice.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements.
The notice requirements of paragraphs
(d) and (g) of this section will not apply
if:
(1) The Foundation determines that
the information should not be disclosed
(the Foundation protects from
disclosure to third parties information
about specific unfunded applications,
including pending, withdrawn, or
declined proposals);
(2) The information lawfully has been
published or has been officially made
available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by statute (other than the
FOIA) or by a regulation issued in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 12600 (3 CFR, 1988
Comp., p. 235); or
(4) The designation made by the
submitter under paragraph (c) of this
section appears obviously frivolous, in
which case the Foundation will, within
a reasonable time prior to a specified
disclosure date, give the submitter
written notice of any final decision to
disclose the information.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever
a requester files a lawsuit seeking to
compel the disclosure of business
information, the Foundation will
promptly notify the submitter(s).
Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit
seeking to prevent the disclosure of
business information, the Foundation
will notify the requester(s).
§ 612.9
Appeals.
(a) Appeals of denials. You may
appeal a denial of your request to the
General Counsel, National Science
Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You
must make your appeal in writing and
it must be received by the Office of the
General Counsel within ten days of the
receipt of the denial (weekends, legal
holidays, and the date of receipt
excluded). Clearly mark your appeal
letter and the envelope ‘‘Freedom of
Information Act Appeal.’’ Your appeal
letter must include a copy of your
written request and the denial together
with any written argument you wish to
submit.
(b) Responses to appeals. A written
decision on your appeal will be made by
the General Counsel. A decision
affirming an adverse determination in
whole or in part will contain a
statement of the reason(s) for the
affirmance, including any FOIA
exemption(s) applied, and will inform
you of the FOIA provisions for court
review of the decision. If the adverse
determination is reversed or modified
on appeal, in whole or in part, you will
be notified in a written decision and
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
your request will be reprocessed in
accordance with that appeal decision.
(c) When appeal is required. If you
wish to seek review by a court of any
denial, you must first appeal it under
this section.
§ 612.10
Fees.
(a) In general. NSF will charge for
processing requests under the FOIA in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, except where fees are limited
under paragraph (d) of this section or
where a waiver or reduction of fees is
granted under paragraph (k) of this
section. If fees are applicable, NSF will
itemize the amounts charged. NSF may
collect all applicable fees before sending
copies of requested records to a
requester. Requesters must pay fees by
check or money order made payable to
the Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Commercial use request means a
request from or on behalf of a person
who seeks information for a use or
purpose that furthers his or her
commercial, trade, or profit interests,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. When it
appears that the requester will put the
records to a commercial use, either
because of the nature of the request
itself or because NSF has reasonable
cause to doubt a requester’s stated use,
NSF will provide the requester a
reasonable opportunity to submit
further clarification.
(2) Direct costs means those expenses
that an agency actually incurs in
searching for and duplicating (and, in
the case of commercial use requests,
reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA
request. Direct costs include, for
example, the salary of the employee
performing the work (the basic rate of
pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of
that rate to cover benefits) and the cost
of operating duplication machinery. Not
included in direct costs are overhead
expenses such as the costs of space and
heating or lighting of the facility in
which the records are kept.
(3) Duplication means the making of
a copy of a record, or of the information
contained in it, necessary to respond to
a FOIA request. Copies can take the
form of paper, microform, audiovisual
materials, or electronic records (for
example, magnetic tape or disk) among
others. NSF will honor a requester’s
specified preference of form or format of
disclosure if the record is readily
reproducible by NSF, with reasonable
effort, in the requested form or format.
(4) Educational institution means a
preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate
higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution
of vocational education, that operates a
program of scholarly research. To be in
this category, a requester must show
that the request is authorized by and
made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are not
sought for a commercial use, but are
sought to further scholarly research.
(5) Noncommercial scientific
institution means an institution that is
not operated on a ‘‘commercial’’ basis,
as that term is defined in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, and that is
operated solely for the purpose of
conducting scientific research, the
results of which are not intended to
promote any particular product or
industry. To be in this category, a
requester must show that the request is
authorized by and made under the
auspices of a qualifying institution and
that the records are not sought for a
commercial use or to promote any
particular product or industry, but are
sought to further scientific research.
(6) Representative of the news media
or news media requester means any
person actively gathering news for an
entity that is organized and operated to
publish or broadcast news to the public.
The term ‘‘news’’ means information
that is about current events or that
would be of current interest to the
public. Examples of news media entities
include television or radio stations
broadcasting to the public at large and
publishers of periodicals (but only in
those instances where they can qualify
as disseminators of ‘‘news’’) who make
their products available for purchase or
subscription by the general public. For
‘‘freelance’’ journalists to be regarded as
working for a news organization, they
must demonstrate a solid basis for
expecting publication through that
organization. A publication contract
would be the clearest proof, but the
Agency or the OIG, as appropriate, shall
also look to the past publication record
of a requester in making this
determination. To be in this category, a
requester must not be seeking the
requested records for a commercial use.
However, a request for records
supporting the news-dissemination
function of the requester shall not be
considered to be for a commercial use.
(7) Review means the examination of
a record located in response to a request
in order to determine whether any
portion of it is exempt from disclosure.
It also includes processing any record
for disclosure, for example, doing all
that is necessary to redact it and prepare
it for disclosure. Review costs are
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
recoverable even if a record ultimately
is not disclosed. Review time includes
time spent considering any formal
objection to disclosure made by a
business submitter under § 612.8, but
does not include time spent resolving
general legal or policy issues regarding
the application of exemptions.
(8) Search means the process of
looking for and retrieving records or
information responsive to a request. It
includes page by page or line by line
identification of information within
records and also includes reasonable
efforts to locate and retrieve information
from records maintained in electronic
form or format. NSF will ensure that
searches are done in the most efficient
and least expensive manner reasonably
possible. For example, NSF will not
search line by line where duplicating an
entire document would be quicker and
less expensive.
(c) Fees. In responding to FOIA
requests, NSF will charge the following
fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees
has been granted under paragraph (k) of
this section:
(1) Search. (i) Search fees will be
charged for all requests—other than
requests made by educational
institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the
news media—subject to the limitations
of paragraph (d) of this section. NSF
may charge for time spent searching
even if responsive records are not
located or are withheld entirely as
exempt from disclosure.
(ii) Manual searches for records.
Whenever feasible, NSF will charge at
the salary rate(s) (i.e., basic pay plus 16
percent) of the employee(s) conducting
the search. Where a homogeneous class
of personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all
administrative/clerical or all
professional/executive), NSF has
established an average rate for the range
of grades typically involved. Routine
search for records by clerical personnel
are charged at $2.50 for each quarter
hour. When a non-routine, non-clerical
search by professional personnel is
conducted (for example, where the task
of determining which records fall
within a request requires professional
time) the charge is $7.50 for each
quarter hour.
(iii) Computer searches of records.
NSF will charge at the actual direct cost
of conducting the search. This will
include the cost of computer operations
for that portion of operating time that is
directly attributable to searching for
records responsive to a FOIA request
and operator/programmer salary (i.e.,
basic pay plus 16 percent) apportionable
to the search. When NSF can establish
a reasonable agency-wide average rate
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16821
for computer operating costs and
operator/programmer salaries involved
in FOIA searches, the Foundation will
do so and charge accordingly.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will
be charged to all requesters, subject to
the limitations of paragraph (d) of this
section. For a paper photocopy of a
record (no more than one copy of which
need be supplied), the fee will be 25
cents per page. For copies produced by
computer, such as tapes or printouts,
NSF will charge the direct costs,
including operator time, of producing
the copy. For other forms of duplication,
NSF will charge the direct costs of that
duplication.
(3) Review. Review fees will be
charged to requesters who make a
commercial use request. Review fees
will be charged only for the initial
record review—in other words, the
review done when NSF determines
whether an exemption applies to a
particular record or record portion at the
initial request level. NSF may charge for
review even if a record ultimately is not
disclosed. No charge will be made for
review at the administrative appeal
level for an exemption already applied.
However, records or record portions
withheld under an exemption that is
subsequently determined not to apply
may be reviewed again to determine
whether any other exemption not
previously considered applies; the costs
of that review are chargeable where it is
made necessary by a change of
circumstances. Review fees will be
charged at the salary rate (basic pay plus
16%) of the employee(s) performing the
review.
(d) Limitations on charging fees. (1)
No search fee will be charged for
requests by educational institutions,
noncommercial scientific institutions,
or representatives of the news media.
(2) Except for requesters seeking
records for a commercial use, NSF will
provide without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication
(or the cost equivalent); and
(ii) The first two hours of search (or
the cost equivalent).
(3) Whenever a total fee calculated
under paragraph (c) of this section is
$25.00 or less for any request, no fee
will be charged.
(4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)
(2) and (3) of this section work together.
This means that noncommercial
requesters will be charged no fees
unless the cost of search in excess of
two hours plus the cost of duplication
in excess of 100 pages totals more than
$25.00. Commercial requesters will not
be charged unless the costs of search,
review, and duplication total more than
$25.00.
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
16822
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess
of $25.00. When NSF determines or
estimates that the fees to be charged
under this section will exceed $25.00, it
will notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount of the fees, unless the
requester has indicated a willingness to
pay fees as high as those anticipated. If
only a portion of the fee can be
estimated readily, NSF will advise the
requester that the estimated fee may be
only a portion of the total fee. In cases
in which a requester has been notified
that actual or estimated fees exceed
$25.00, the request will not be
considered perfected and further work
will not be done until the requester
agrees to pay the anticipated total fee.
Any such agreement should be
memorialized in writing. A notice under
this paragraph will offer the requester
an opportunity to discuss the matter
with Foundation personnel in order to
reformulate the request to meet the
requester’s needs at a lower cost, if
possible. If a requester fails to respond
within 60 days of notice of actual or
estimated fees with an agreement to pay
those fees, NSF may administratively
close the request.
(f) Charges for other services. Apart
from the other provisions of this section,
when NSF chooses as a matter of
administrative discretion to provide a
requested special service—such as
certifying that records are true copies or
sending them by other than ordinary
mail—the direct costs of providing the
service will be charged to the requester.
(g) Charging interest. NSF may charge
interest on any unpaid bill starting on
the 31st day following the date of billing
the requester. Interest charges will be
assessed at the rate provided in 31
U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the
date of the billing until payment is
received by NSF. NSF will follow the
provisions of the Debt Collection Act of
1982 (Pub. L. 97–365, 96 Stat. 1749), as
amended, and its administrative
procedures, including the use of
consumer reporting agencies, collection
agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. Where NSF
reasonably believes that a requester or a
group of requesters acting together is
attempting to divide a request into a
series of requests for the purpose of
avoiding fees, the agency may aggregate
those requests and charge accordingly.
NSF may presume that multiple
requests of this type made within a 30day period have been made in order to
avoid fees. Where requests are separated
by a longer period, NSF will aggregate
them only where there exists a solid
basis for determining that aggregation is
warranted under all the circumstances
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
involved. Multiple requests involving
unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For
requests other than those described in
paragraphs (i)(2) and (3) of this section,
NSF will not require the requester to
make an advance payment—in other
words, a payment made before work is
begun or continued on a request.
Payment owed for work already
completed (i.e., a prepayment before
copies are sent to a requester) is not an
advance payment.
(2) Where NSF determines or
estimates that a total fee to be charged
under this section will be more than
$250.00, it may require the requester to
make an advance payment of an amount
up to the amount of the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to
process the request, except where it
receives a satisfactory assurance of full
payment from a requester that has a
history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously
failed to pay a properly charged fee to
any agency within 30 days of the date
of billing, NSF may require the
requester to pay the full amount due,
plus any applicable interest, and to
make an advance payment of the full
amount of any anticipated fee, before
NSF begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request
from that requester.
(4) In cases in which NSF requires
advance payment or payment due under
paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the
request will not be considered perfected
and further work will not be done on it
until the required payment is received.
(j) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any statute that
specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of
records. Where records responsive to
requests are maintained for distribution
by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, NSF will
inform requesters of the steps for
obtaining records from those sources so
that they may do so most economically.
(k) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1)
Records responsive to a request will be
furnished without charge or at a charge
reduced below that established under
paragraph (c) of this section where NSF
determines, based on all available
information, that disclosure of the
requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government and is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) To determine whether the first fee
waiver requirement is met, NSF will
consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether
the subject of the requested records
concerns ‘‘the operations or activities of
the government.’’ The subject of the
requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the
information to be disclosed: Whether
disclosure is ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
understanding of government operations
or activities. The disclosable portions of
the requested records must be
meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities in
order to be ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
increased public understanding of those
operations or activities. Disclosure of
information already in the public
domain, in either duplicative or
substantially identical form, is unlikely
to contribute to such understanding
where nothing new would be added to
the public’s understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an
understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure:
Whether disclosure of the requested
information will contribute to ‘‘public
understanding.’’ The disclosure must
contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons
interested in the subject as opposed to
the individual understanding of the
requester. A requester’s expertise in the
subject area and ability and intention to
effectively convey information to the
public will be considered. A
representative of the news media as
defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this
section will normally be presumed to
satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the
contribution to public understanding:
Whether disclosure is likely to
contribute ‘‘significantly’’ to public
understanding of government operations
or activities. The public’s understanding
of the subject in question must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a
significant extent as compared to the
level of public understanding existing
prior to the disclosure. NSF will make
no value judgments about whether
information that would contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government is ‘‘important’’ enough to be
made public.
(3) To determine whether the second
fee waiver requirement is met, NSF will
consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a
commercial interest: Whether the
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 69 / Monday, April 13, 2009 / Proposed Rules
requester has a commercial interest that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. NSF will consider any
commercial interest of the requester
(with reference to the definition of
‘‘commercial use’’ in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section), or of any person on whose
behalf the requester may be acting, that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters will be given an
opportunity in the administrative
process to provide explanatory
information regarding this
consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure:
Whether any identified commercial
interest of the requester is sufficiently
large, in comparison with the public
interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
‘‘primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester.’’ A fee waiver or
reduction is justified where the public
interest standard is satisfied and that
public interest is greater in magnitude
than that of any identified commercial
interest in disclosure. NSF ordinarily
will presume that where a news media
requester has satisfied the public
interest standard, the public interest
will be the interest primarily served by
disclosure to that requester. Disclosure
to data brokers or others who merely
compile and market government
information for direct economic return
will not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(4) Where only some of the requested
records satisfy the requirements for a
waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted
for those records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or
reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3)
of this section, insofar as they apply to
each request.
§ 612.11
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this part will be construed
to entitle any person, as of right, to any
service or to the disclosure of any record
to which such person is not entitled
under the FOIA.
Dated: April 7, 2009.
Amy Northcutt,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9–8262 Filed 4–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Apr 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 2, 19 and 52
[FAR Case 2006–005; Docket 2009–0014;
Sequence 1]
RIN 9000–AL18
Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR
Case 2006–005, HUBZone Program
Revisions
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
(Councils) are proposing to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement revisions to the Small
Business Administration’s HUBZone
Program as a result of revisions to the
Small Business Administration’s
regulations.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the FAR
Secretariat on or before June 12, 2009 to
be considered in the formulation of a
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by FAR case 2006–005 by any
of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
inputting ‘‘FAR Case 2006–005’’ under
the heading ‘‘Comment or Submission’’.
Select the link ‘‘Send a Comment or
Submission’’ that corresponds with FAR
Case 2006–005. Follow the instructions
provided to complete the ‘‘Public
Comment and Submission Form’’.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case 2006–
005’’ on your attached document.
• Fax: 202–501–4067.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(VIR), 1800 F Street, NW., Room 4041,
ATTN: Hada Flowers, Washington, DC
20405.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR case 2006–005 in all
correspondence related to this case. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16823
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rhonda Cundiff, Procurement Analyst,
at (202) 501–0044 for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the FAR Secretariat at (202) 501–4755.
Please cite FAR case 2006–005.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
On May 24, 2004, the Small Business
Administration (SBA) published a final
rule in the Federal Register at 69 FR
29411, and on August 30, 2005, an
interim rule at 70 FR 51243 amending
its HUBZone regulations at 13 CFR Part
126 to implement the Small Business
Reauthorization Act of 2000, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005,
and other various policy changes. This
rule proposes to amend the FAR, as
follows, to implement changes in the
HUBZone regulations:
• FAR 19.1303(d), Status as a
qualified HUBZone small business
concern; 52.219–3, Notice of Total
HUBZone Set-Aside; and 52.219–4,
Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for
HUBZone Small Business Concerns, are
revised to stipulate that to be eligible for
a HUBZone contract, a HUBZone small
business concern must be a HUBZone
small business concern both at the time
of its initial offer and at the time of
contract award. SBA revised the
HUBZone regulations to require
HUBZone small business concerns to
‘‘certify,’’ at the time of their initial
offers and again at the time of contract
award, their HUBZone small business
concern status. While the SBA
regulations use the term ‘‘certify,’’ the
certification is intended to be a
‘‘representation’’ as used in the FAR.
Small business concern offerors are
already required to ‘‘represent’’ their
HUBZone small business concern status
at the time of their initial offer.
• FAR 52.219–3 and 52.219–4 are
revised to add a requirement that the
HUBZone concern provide to the
contracting officer a copy of the notice
required by 13 CFR 126.501 if material
changes occur before award that could
affect its HUBZone eligibility.
• The performance of work
requirements of sections 52.219–3 and
52.219–4 are revised to be consistent
with the SBA HUBZone regulations.
Alternate I would be used if there are
not at least two HUBZones that can
meet the 50 percent requirement. FAR
19.1308, Performance of work
requirements (limitations on
subcontracting), is also revised to reflect
the changes in the performance of work
requirements.
• The definition of ‘‘HUBZone
contract,’’ which is used in the SBA
E:\FR\FM\13APP1.SGM
13APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 69 (Monday, April 13, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16815-16823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8262]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
45 CFR Part 612
RIN 3145-AA52
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Opportunity for Comment
AGENCY: National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and opportunity for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document sets forth proposed revisions of the
Foundation's regulations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
The new FOIA provisions implement the Openness Promotes Effectiveness
in our National Government Act of 2007, or the OPEN Government Act of
2007, Public Law 110-175.
DATES: Submit comments on or before May 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this proposed rule to the
Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You may also send comments
by facsimile transmission to (703) 292-9041, or send them
electronically through the Federal Government's one-stop rulemaking Web
site at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie A. Jensen, Legal Analyst,
Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, telephone
703-292-8060 and e-mail ljensen@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Availability of Records and Information (45 CFR part 612) (FOIA
Regulations)
This revision of part 612 implements the new provisions of the
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act of 2007,
or the OPEN Government Act of 2007, Public Law 110-175. No changes to
the Act's nine exemptions were made. The amendments address a range of
procedural issues impacting FOIA administration, including the
codification of several provisions of Executive Order 13392, Improving
Agency Disclosure of Information. Clarifications or minor procedural
changes are found at Sec. 612.3(a), (b), (f) and (g) (Requirements for
making requests), Sec. 612.4(a) (Responding to requests), Sec. 612.5
(c)(1) and (2) (Timing of Response to Requests), Sec. 612.6 (a), (b),
(c)(1) (Processing requests) and Sec. 612.10(c)(iii) (Fees).
For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601), the
proposed rule will not have a significant
[[Page 16816]]
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities; the proposed
rule addresses the procedures to be followed when submitting or
responding to requests for information under the Freedom of Information
Act. For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4) the proposed rule would not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments and would not result in increased expenditures by
State, local, and tribal governments, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more. For purposes of Executive Order 12866, the proposed
rule is not a significant regulatory action requiring review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35) it has been determined that this
proposed rulemaking does not impose any reporting or recordkeeping
requirement on the public.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 612
Administrative practice and procedure: Freedom of information.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Science
Foundation proposes to amend 45 CFR chapter VI by revising part 612 as
follows:
PART 612--AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
Sec.
612.1 General provisions.
612.2 Public reading room.
612.3 Requirements for making requests.
612.4 Responding to requests.
612.5 Timing of responses to requests.
612.6 Processing requests.
612.7 Exemptions.
612.8 Business information.
612.9 Appeals.
612.10 Fees.
612.11 Other rights and services.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.
Sec. 612.1 General provisions.
This part contains the rules that the National Science Foundation
follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. Information routinely made
available to the public as part of a regular Foundation activity (for
example, program announcements and solicitations, summary of awarded
proposals, statistical reports on U.S. science, news releases) may be
provided to the public without reliance on this part. As a matter of
policy, the Foundation also makes discretionary disclosures of records
or information otherwise exempt under the FOIA whenever disclosure
would not foreseeably harm an interest protected by a FOIA exemption.
This policy, however, does not create any right enforceable in court.
When individuals seek records about themselves under the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, NSF processes those requests under both NSF's
Privacy regulations at part 613, and this part.
Sec. 612.2 Public reading room.
(a) The Foundation maintains a public reading room located in the
NSF Library at 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 225, Arlington, Virginia,
open during regular working hours Monday through Friday. It contains
the records that the FOIA requires to be made regularly available for
public inspection and copying and has computers and printers available
for public use in accessing records. Also available for public
inspection and copying are current subject matter indexes of reading
room records.
(b) Information about FOIA and Privacy at NSF and copies of
frequently requested FOIA releases are available Online at https://www.nsf.gov/pubinfo/foia.html. Most NSF policy documents, staff
instructions, manuals, and other publications that affect a member of
the public, are available in electronic form through the ``Documents''
option on the tool bar on NSF's Home Page on the Internet at https://www.nsf.gov.
Sec. 612.3 Requirements for making requests.
(a) Where to send a request. The National Science Foundation has
one Agency component. You may make a FOIA request for records of the
National Science Foundation by writing directly to the FOIA Officer,
Office of the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. For records maintained by
the NSF Office of the Inspector General (OIG), a designated Agency
component, you may write directly to the Office of Inspector General,
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1135,
Arlington, VA 22230. The Agency FOIA officer and the OIG component will
also forward requests as appropriate. Requests may also be sent by
facsimile to the Agency FOIA Officer on (703) 292-9041 or by e-mail to
foia@nsf.gov; or, as appropriate to the OIG component via Fax on (703)
292-9158.
(b) Form of request. A FOIA request need not be in any particular
format, but it must be in writing, include the requester's name and
mailing address, and be clearly identified both on the envelope and in
the letter, or in a facsimile or electronic mail message as a Freedom
of Information Act or ``FOIA'' request. It must describe the records
sought with sufficient specificity to permit identification, and
include agreement to pay applicable fees chargeable under the
Foundation's fee schedule as described in Sec. 612.10.
(c)(1) If you are making a request for records about yourself and
the records are not contained in a Privacy Act system of records, your
request will be processed only under the FOIA, since the Privacy Act
does not apply. If the records about you are contained in a Privacy Act
system of records, NSF will respond with information on how to make a
Privacy Act request (see NSF Privacy Act regulations at 45 CFR 613.2).
(2) If you are making a request for personal information about
another individual, either a written authorization signed by that
individual in accordance with Sec. 613.2(f) permitting disclosure of
those records to you, or proof that that individual is deceased (for
example, a copy of a death certificate or a published obituary) will
help the agency process your request.
(d) Description of records sought. Your request must describe the
records that you seek in enough detail to enable NSF personnel to
locate them with a reasonable amount of effort. A record must have been
created or obtained by NSF and under the control of NSF at the time of
the request to be subject to the FOIA. NSF has no obligation under the
FOIA to create, compile or obtain a record to satisfy a FOIA request.
Whenever possible, your request should include specific descriptive
information about each record sought, such as the date, title or name,
author, recipient, and subject matter of the record. As a general rule,
the more specific you are about the records or type of records that you
want, the more likely the Foundation will be able to locate those
records in response to your request, and the more likely fees will be
reduced or eliminated. If NSF determines that your request does not
reasonably describe records, you will be advised what additional
information is needed to perfect your request or why your request is
otherwise insufficient.
(e) Agreement to pay fees. Your request must state that you will
promptly pay the total fees chargeable under this regulation or set a
maximum amount you are willing to pay. NSF does not charge if fees
total less than $25.00. If you seek a waiver of fees, please see Sec.
612.10(k) for a discussion of the factors you must address. If you
place an inadequate limit on the amount you will pay, or have failed to
make payments for previous requests, NSF may require advance payment
(see Sec. 612.10(i)).
[[Page 16817]]
(f) Receipt date. A request that meets the requirements of this
section will be considered received on the date it is received by the
Office of the General Counsel or the Office of the Inspector General.
In determining which records are responsive to a FOIA request, the
Foundation will include only records in its possession as of the date
the search begins.
(g) Publications excluded. For the purpose of public requests for
records the term ``record'' does not include publications which are
available to the public in the Federal Register, or by sale or free
distribution. NSF publications are available in print. To request one
or more print publications (https://www.nsf.gov/publications/obtain.jsp), you may:
(1) Fill out Web-based order form. https://www.nsf.gov/publications/orderpub.jsp.
(2) Contact NSF Publications at (703) 292-PUBS (7827).
(3) Send a letter with the publication number(s) clearly stated to:
NSF Publications, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard,
Suite P-60, Arlington, VA 22230.
Sec. 612.4 Responding to requests.
(a) Monitoring of requests. The NSF Office of the General Counsel
(OGC), or such other office as may be designated by the Director, will
serve as the central office for administering these regulations. For
records maintained by the Office of Inspector General, that Office will
control incoming requests made directly or referred to it, dispatch
response letters, and maintain administrative records. For all other
records maintained by NSF, OGC (or such other office as may be
designated by the Director) will control incoming requests, assign them
to appropriate action offices, monitor compliance, consult with action
offices on disclosure, approve necessary extensions, dispatch denial
and other letters, and maintain administrative records.
(b) Consultations and referrals. When the Foundation receives a
request for a record in its possession that originated with another
agency or in which another agency has a substantial interest, it may
decide that the other agency of the Federal Government is better able
to determine whether the record should or should not be released under
the FOIA.
(1) If the Foundation determines that it is the agency best able to
process the record in response to the request, then it will do so,
after consultation with the other interested agencies where
appropriate.
(2) If it determines that it is not the agency best able to process
the record, then it will refer the request regarding that record (or
portion of the record) to the agency that originated or has a
substantial interest in the record in question (but only if that agency
is subject to the FOIA). Ordinarily, the agency that originated a
record will be presumed to be best able to determine whether to
disclose it.
(c) Notice of referral. Whenever the Foundation refers all or any
part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another
agency, it ordinarily will notify the requester of the referral and
inform the requester of the name of each agency to which the request
has been referred and of the part of the request that has been
referred, unless such notification would disclose information otherwise
exempt.
Sec. 612.5 Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. NSF ordinarily will initiate processing of requests
according to their order of receipt.
(b) Time for response. The Foundation will make reasonable effort
to act on a request within 20 days of when a request is received by the
OGC or the OIG or perfected (excluding the date of receipt, weekends,
and legal holidays). A request is perfected when you have reasonably
described the records sought under Sec. 612.3(d), agreed to pay fees
chargeable under Sec. 612.3(c), or otherwise met the fee requirements
under Sec. 612.10.
(c) Unusual circumstances. (1) Where the time limits for processing
a request cannot be met because of ``unusual circumstances'' as defined
in the FOIA, the FOIA Officer or the OIG component will notify the
requester as soon as practicable in writing of the unusual
circumstances and may extend the response period for up to ten working
days.
(2) Where the extension is for more than ten working days, the FOIA
Officer or the OIG component will provide the requester with an
opportunity either to modify the request so that it may be processed
within the time limits or to arrange an agreed upon alternative time
period with the FOIA Officer or the OIG component for processing the
request or a modified request.
(d) Expedited processing. (1) If you want to receive expedited
processing you must submit a statement, certified to be true and
correct to the best of your knowledge and belief, explaining in detail
the basis for requesting expedited processing.
(2) Requests and appeals will be given expedited treatment whenever
it is determined that a requester has demonstrated compelling need by
presenting:
(i) Circumstances in which the lack of expedited treatment could
reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or
physical safety of an individual; or
(ii) An urgency to inform the public about an actual or alleged
Federal government activity, if made by a person primarily engaged in
disseminating information.
For example, a requester who is not a full-time member of the news
media must establish that he or she is a person whose main professional
activity or occupation is information dissemination, though it need not
be his or her sole occupation. Such requester also must establish a
particular urgency to inform the public about the government activity
involved in the request, beyond the public's right to know about
government activity generally, and that the information sought has
particular value that would be lost if not disseminated quickly.
(3) Within ten calendar days of receipt of a request for expedited
processing, the FOIA Officer or OIG component will decide whether to
grant it, and will notify the requester of the decision orally or in
writing. If a request for expedited treatment is granted, the request
will be processed as soon as practicable. If a request for expedited
processing is denied, any appeal of that decision will be acted on
expeditiously.
Sec. 612.6 Processing requests.
(a) Acknowledgment of requests. Each request is assigned a tracking
number and the requester is advised of this FOIA number, the receipt
date and the estimated date of action on the request.
(b) Grants of requests. Once the Foundation makes a determination
to grant a request in whole or in part, it will notify the requester in
writing. The Foundation will inform the requester in the notice of any
applicable fee and will disclose records to the requester promptly on
payment of applicable fees. Records disclosed in part will be marked or
annotated to show both the amount, the location and the FOIA Exemption
under which the deletion is made.
(c) Denials of requests. (1) Denials of FOIA requests will be made
by the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of the Inspector
General, or such other office as may be designated by the Director. The
response letter will briefly set forth the reasons for the denial,
including any FOIA exemption(s) applied by the Foundation or the OIG in
denying the request. It will also provide the name and title or
position of the
[[Page 16818]]
person responsible for the denial, will inform the requester of the
right to appeal, and will, where appropriate, include an estimate of
the volume of any requested materials withheld. An estimate need not be
provided when the volume is otherwise indicated through deletions on
records disclosed in part, or if providing an estimate would harm an
interest protected by an applicable exemption.
(2) Requesters can appeal an agency determination to withhold all
or part of any requested record; a determination that a requested
record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination that what
has been requested is not a record subject to the Act; a disapproval of
a fee category claim by a requester; denial of a fee waiver or
reduction; or a denial of a request for expedited treatment (see Sec.
612.9).
Sec. 612.7 Exemptions.
(a) Exemptions from disclosure. The following types of records or
information may be withheld as exempt in full or in part from mandatory
public disclosure:
(1) Exemption 1--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1). Records specifically
authorized and properly classified pursuant to Executive Order to be
kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy. NSF
does not have classifying authority and normally does not deal with
classified materials.
(2) Exemption 2--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2). Records related solely to the
internal personnel rules and practices of NSF. This exemption primarily
protects information that if released would allow the recipient to
circumvent a statute or agency regulation. Administrative information
such as rules relating to the work hours, leave, and working conditions
of NSF personnel, or similar matters, can be disclosed to the extent
that no harm would be caused to the functions to which the information
pertains. Examples of records exempt from disclosure include, but are
not limited to:
(i) Operating rules, guidelines, manuals on internal procedure,
schedules and methods utilized by NSF investigators, inspectors,
auditors and examiners.
(ii) Negotiating positions or limits at least until the execution
of a contract (including a grant or cooperative agreement) or the
completion of the action to which the negotiating positions were
applicable. They may also be exempt pursuant to other provisions of
this section.
(iii) Information relating to position management and manpower
utilization, such as internal staffing plans, authorizations or
controls, or involved in determination of the qualifications of
candidates for employment, advancement, or promotion including
examination questions and answers.
(iv) Computer software, the release of which would allow
circumvention of a statute or NSF rules, regulations, orders, manuals,
directives, instructions, or procedures; or the integrity and security
of data systems.
(3) Exemption 3--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3). Records specifically exempted
from disclosure by another statute that either requires that the
information be withheld in such a way that the agency has no discretion
in the matter; or establishes particular criteria for withholding or
refers to particular types of information to be withheld. Examples of
records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to:
(i) Trade secrets, processes, operations, style of work, or
apparatus; or the confidential statistical data, type, amount, or
source of any income, profits, losses, or expenditures of any person,
firm, partnership, corporation or association, 18 U.S.C. 1905;
(ii) Records that disclose any invention in which the Federal
Government owns or may own a right, title, or interest (including a
nonexclusive license), 35 U.S.C. 205;
(iii) Contractor proposals not specifically set forth or
incorporated by reference into a contract, 41 U.S.C. 253b(m);
(iv) Information protected by the Procurement Integrity Act, 41
U.S.C. 423.
(4) Exemption 4--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). Trade secrets and commercial
or financial information obtained from a person, and privileged or
confidential. Information subject to this exemption is that customarily
held in confidence by the originator(s), including nonprofit
organizations and their employees. Release of such information is
likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of the
originator or submitter, or impair the Foundation's ability to obtain
such information in the future. NSF will process information
potentially exempted from disclosure by Exemption 4 under Sec. 612.8.
Examples of information exempt from disclosure include, but are not
limited to:
(i) Information received in confidence, such as grant applications,
fellowship applications, and research proposals prior to award;
(ii) Confidential scientific and manufacturing processes or
developments, and technical, scientific, statistical data or other
information developed by a grantee.
(iii) Technical, scientific, or statistical data, and commercial or
financial information privileged or received in confidence from an
existing or potential contractor or subcontractor, in connection with
bids, proposals, or contracts, concerning contract performance, income,
profits, losses, and expenditures, as well as trade secrets,
inventions, discoveries, or other proprietary data. When the provisions
of 41 U.S.C. 253b(m) or 41 U.S.C. 423 are met, certain proprietary and
source selection information may also be withheld under Exemption 3.
(iv) Confidential proprietary information submitted on a voluntary
basis.
(v) Statements or information collected in the course of
inspections, investigations, or audits, when such statements are
received in confidence from the individual and retained in confidence
because they reveal trade secrets or commercial or financial
information normally considered confidential or privileged.
(5) Exemption 5--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5). Inter-agency or intra-agency
memoranda or letters which would not be available by law to a private
party in litigation with NSF. Factual material contained in such
records will be considered for release if it can be reasonably
segregated and is not otherwise exempt. Examples of records exempt from
disclosure include, but are not limited to:
(i) Reports, memoranda, correspondence, work papers, minutes of
meetings, and staff papers, containing evaluations, advice, opinions,
suggestions, or other deliberative material that are prepared for use
within NSF or within the Executive Branch of the Government by agency
personnel and others acting in a consultant or advisory capacity;
(ii) Advance information on proposed NSF plans to procure, lease,
or otherwise acquire, or dispose of materials, real estate, facilities,
services or functions, when such information would provide undue or
unfair competitive advantage to private interests or impede legitimate
government functions;
(iii) Trade secret or other confidential research development, or
commercial information owned by the Government, where premature release
is likely to affect the Government's negotiating position or other
commercial interest;
(iv) Records prepared for use in proceedings before any Federal or
State court or administrative body;
(v) Evaluations of and comments on specific grant applications,
research projects or proposals, or potential contractors and their
products, whether
[[Page 16819]]
made by NSF personnel or by external reviewers acting either
individually or in panels, committees or similar groups;
(vi) Preliminary, draft or unapproved documents, such as opinions,
recommendations, evaluations, decisions, or studies conducted or
supported by NSF;
(vii) Proposed budget requests, and supporting projections used or
arising in the preparation and/or execution of a budget; proposed
annual and multi-year policy, priorities, program and financial plan
and supporting papers;
(viii) Those portions of official reports of inspection, reports of
the Inspector General, audits, investigations, or surveys pertaining to
safety, security, or the internal management, administration, or
operation of NSF, when these records have traditionally been treated by
the courts as privileged against disclosure in litigation.
(6) Exemption 6--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). Personnel and medical files
and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. The exemption applies to
living persons and to family members of a deceased person identified in
a record. Information in such files which is not otherwise exempt from
disclosure pursuant to other provisions of this section will be
released to the subject or to his designated legal representative, and
may be disclosed to others with the subject's written consent. Examples
of records exempt from disclosure include, but are not limited to:
(i) Reports, records, and other materials pertaining to individual
cases in which disciplinary or other administrative action has been or
may be taken. Opinions and orders resulting from those administrative
or disciplinary proceedings shall be disclosed without identifying
details if used, cited, or relied upon as precedent.
(ii) Records compiled to evaluate or adjudicate the suitability of
candidates for employment, and the eligibility of individuals (civilian
or contractor employees) for security clearances, or for access to
classified information.
(iii) Reports and evaluations which reflect upon the qualifications
or competence of individuals.
(iv) Personal information such as home addresses and telephone and
facsimiles numbers, private e-mail addresses, social security numbers,
dates of birth, marital status and the like.
(v) The exemption also applies when the fact of the existence or
nonexistence of a responsive record would itself reveal personally
private information, and the public interest in disclosure is not
sufficient to outweigh the privacy interest.
(7) Exemption 7--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7). Records or information
compiled for civil or criminal law enforcement purposes, including the
implementation of Executive Orders or regulations issued pursuant to
law. This exemption may exempt from mandatory disclosure records not
originally created, but later gathered, for law enforcement purposes.
(i) This exemption applies only to the extent that the production
of such law enforcement records or information:
(A) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement
proceedings;
(B) Would deprive a person of the right to a fair trial or an
impartial adjudication;
(C) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy of a living person, or family members of a
deceased person identified in a record;
(D) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a
confidential source, including a source within the Federal Government,
or a State, local, or foreign agency or authority, or any private
institution, that furnished information on a confidential basis; and
information furnished by a confidential source and obtained by a
criminal law enforcement authority in a criminal investigation;
(E) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement
investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law
enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could
reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or
(F) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical
safety of any individual.
(ii) Examples of records exempt from disclosure include, but are
not limited to:
(A) The identity and statements of complainants or witnesses, or
other material developed during the course of an investigation and all
materials prepared in connection with related government litigation or
adjudicative proceedings;
(B) The identity of firms or individuals investigated for alleged
irregularities involving NSF grants, contracts or other matters when no
indictment has been obtained, no civil action has been filed against
them by the United States, or no government-wide public suspension or
debarment has occurred.
(C) Information obtained in confidence, expressed or implied, in
the course of a criminal investigation by the NSF Officer of the
Inspector General.
(iii) The exclusions contained in 5 U.S.C. 552(c)(1) and (2) may
also apply to these records.
(8) Exemption 8--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(8). Records contained in or
related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on
behalf of, or for the use of any agency responsible for the regulation
or supervision of financial institutions.
(9) Exemption 9--5 U.S.C. 552(b)(9). Records containing geological
and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
(b) Deletion of exempt portions and identifying details. Any
reasonably segregable portion of a record will be provided to
requesters after deletion of the portions which are exempt. Whenever
any final opinion, order, or other materials required to be made
available relates to a private party or parties and the release of the
name(s) or other identifying details will constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, the record shall be published
or made available with such identifying details left blank, or shall be
published or made available with obviously fictitious substitutes and
with a notification such as the following: Names of parties and certain
other identifying details have been removed (and fictitious names
substituted) in order to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of the
personal privacy of the individuals involved.
Sec. 612.8 Business information.
(a) In general. Business information obtained by the Foundation
from a submitter of that information will be disclosed under the FOIA
only under this section's procedures.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Business Information means commercial or financial information
obtained by the Foundation from a submitter that may be protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the FOIA and Sec. 612.7(a)(4).
(2) Submitter means any person or entity from whom the Foundation
obtains business information, directly or indirectly. The term includes
corporations; state, local, and tribal governments; and foreign
governments.
(c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business
information must use good faith efforts to designate, by appropriate
markings, either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time
thereafter, any portions of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under Exemption 4. These designations will
expire ten years after the date of the submission unless the submitter
[[Page 16820]]
requests, and provides justification for, a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. The Foundation will provide a submitter
with prompt written notice of a FOIA request or administrative appeal
that seeks its business information wherever required under this
section, in order to give the submitter an opportunity to object to
disclosure of any specified portion of that information under paragraph
(f) of this section. The notice shall either describe the business
information requested or include copies of the requested records or
record portions containing the information.
(e) Where notice is required. Notice will be given to a submitter
wherever:
(1) The information has been designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4; or
(2) The Foundation has reason to believe that the information may
be protected from disclosure under Exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure. NSF will allow a submitter
a reasonable time, consistent with statutory requirements, to respond
to the notice described in paragraph (d) of this section. If a
submitter has any objection to disclosure, it must submit a detailed
written statement. The statement must specify all grounds for
withholding any portion of the information under any exemption of the
FOIA and, in the case of Exemption 4, must show why the information is
a trade secret, or commercial or financial information that is
privileged or confidential. In the event that a submitter fails to
respond within the time specified in the notice, the submitter will be
considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information.
Information provided by a submitter under this paragraph may itself be
a record subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. The Foundation will consider a
submitter's objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in
deciding whether to disclose business information. Whenever it decides
to disclose business information over the objection of a submitter, the
Foundation will give the submitter written notice, which will include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why the submitter's disclosure
objections were not sustained;
(2) A description of the business information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which will be a reasonable time
subsequent to the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of
paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section will not apply if:
(1) The Foundation determines that the information should not be
disclosed (the Foundation protects from disclosure to third parties
information about specific unfunded applications, including pending,
withdrawn, or declined proposals);
(2) The information lawfully has been published or has been
officially made available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other
than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12600 (3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 235); or
(4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of
this section appears obviously frivolous, in which case the Foundation
will, within a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure date,
give the submitter written notice of any final decision to disclose the
information.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of business information, the
Foundation will promptly notify the submitter(s). Whenever a submitter
files a lawsuit seeking to prevent the disclosure of business
information, the Foundation will notify the requester(s).
Sec. 612.9 Appeals.
(a) Appeals of denials. You may appeal a denial of your request to
the General Counsel, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 1265, Arlington, VA 22230. You must make your appeal
in writing and it must be received by the Office of the General Counsel
within ten days of the receipt of the denial (weekends, legal holidays,
and the date of receipt excluded). Clearly mark your appeal letter and
the envelope ``Freedom of Information Act Appeal.'' Your appeal letter
must include a copy of your written request and the denial together
with any written argument you wish to submit.
(b) Responses to appeals. A written decision on your appeal will be
made by the General Counsel. A decision affirming an adverse
determination in whole or in part will contain a statement of the
reason(s) for the affirmance, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied,
and will inform you of the FOIA provisions for court review of the
decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on
appeal, in whole or in part, you will be notified in a written decision
and your request will be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal
decision.
(c) When appeal is required. If you wish to seek review by a court
of any denial, you must first appeal it under this section.
Sec. 612.10 Fees.
(a) In general. NSF will charge for processing requests under the
FOIA in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, except where
fees are limited under paragraph (d) of this section or where a waiver
or reduction of fees is granted under paragraph (k) of this section. If
fees are applicable, NSF will itemize the amounts charged. NSF may
collect all applicable fees before sending copies of requested records
to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check or money order made
payable to the Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Commercial use request means a request from or on behalf of a
person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers his or
her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can include
furthering those interests through litigation. When it appears that the
requester will put the records to a commercial use, either because of
the nature of the request itself or because NSF has reasonable cause to
doubt a requester's stated use, NSF will provide the requester a
reasonable opportunity to submit further clarification.
(2) Direct costs means those expenses that an agency actually
incurs in searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial
use requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct
costs include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the
work (the basic rate of pay for the employee, plus 16 percent of that
rate to cover benefits) and the cost of operating duplication
machinery. Not included in direct costs are overhead expenses such as
the costs of space and heating or lighting of the facility in which the
records are kept.
(3) Duplication means the making of a copy of a record, or of the
information contained in it, necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Copies can take the form of paper, microform, audiovisual materials, or
electronic records (for example, magnetic tape or disk) among others.
NSF will honor a requester's specified preference of form or format of
disclosure if the record is readily reproducible by NSF, with
reasonable effort, in the requested form or format.
(4) Educational institution means a preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
[[Page 16821]]
institution of undergraduate higher education, an institution of
graduate higher education, an institution of professional education, or
an institution of vocational education, that operates a program of
scholarly research. To be in this category, a requester must show that
the request is authorized by and made under the auspices of a
qualifying institution and that the records are not sought for a
commercial use, but are sought to further scholarly research.
(5) Noncommercial scientific institution means an institution that
is not operated on a ``commercial'' basis, as that term is defined in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that is operated solely for the
purpose of conducting scientific research, the results of which are not
intended to promote any particular product or industry. To be in this
category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by and
made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the
records are not sought for a commercial use or to promote any
particular product or industry, but are sought to further scientific
research.
(6) Representative of the news media or news media requester means
any person actively gathering news for an entity that is organized and
operated to publish or broadcast news to the public. The term ``news''
means information that is about current events or that would be of
current interest to the public. Examples of news media entities include
television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large and
publishers of periodicals (but only in those instances where they can
qualify as disseminators of ``news'') who make their products available
for purchase or subscription by the general public. For ``freelance''
journalists to be regarded as working for a news organization, they
must demonstrate a solid basis for expecting publication through that
organization. A publication contract would be the clearest proof, but
the Agency or the OIG, as appropriate, shall also look to the past
publication record of a requester in making this determination. To be
in this category, a requester must not be seeking the requested records
for a commercial use. However, a request for records supporting the
news-dissemination function of the requester shall not be considered to
be for a commercial use.
(7) Review means the examination of a record located in response to
a request in order to determine whether any portion of it is exempt
from disclosure. It also includes processing any record for disclosure,
for example, doing all that is necessary to redact it and prepare it
for disclosure. Review costs are recoverable even if a record
ultimately is not disclosed. Review time includes time spent
considering any formal objection to disclosure made by a business
submitter under Sec. 612.8, but does not include time spent resolving
general legal or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.
(8) Search means the process of looking for and retrieving records
or information responsive to a request. It includes page by page or
line by line identification of information within records and also
includes reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information from
records maintained in electronic form or format. NSF will ensure that
searches are done in the most efficient and least expensive manner
reasonably possible. For example, NSF will not search line by line
where duplicating an entire document would be quicker and less
expensive.
(c) Fees. In responding to FOIA requests, NSF will charge the
following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been granted
under paragraph (k) of this section:
(1) Search. (i) Search fees will be charged for all requests--other
than requests made by educational institutions, noncommercial
scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media--subject
to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. NSF may charge for
time spent searching even if responsive records are not located or are
withheld entirely as exempt from disclosure.
(ii) Manual searches for records. Whenever feasible, NSF will
charge at the salary rate(s) (i.e., basic pay plus 16 percent) of the
employee(s) conducting the search. Where a homogeneous class of
personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all administrative/clerical or all
professional/executive), NSF has established an average rate for the
range of grades typically involved. Routine search for records by
clerical personnel are charged at $2.50 for each quarter hour. When a
non-routine, non-clerical search by professional personnel is conducted
(for example, where the task of determining which records fall within a
request requires professional time) the charge is $7.50 for each
quarter hour.
(iii) Computer searches of records. NSF will charge at the actual
direct cost of conducting the search. This will include the cost of
computer operations for that portion of operating time that is directly
attributable to searching for records responsive to a FOIA request and
operator/programmer salary (i.e., basic pay plus 16 percent)
apportionable to the search. When NSF can establish a reasonable
agency-wide average rate for computer operating costs and operator/
programmer salaries involved in FOIA searches, the Foundation will do
so and charge accordingly.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will be charged to all
requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this
section. For a paper photocopy of a record (no more than one copy of
which need be supplied), the fee will be 25 cents per page. For copies
produced by computer, such as tapes or printouts, NSF will charge the
direct costs, including operator time, of producing the copy. For other
forms of duplication, NSF will charge the direct costs of that
duplication.
(3) Review. Review fees will be charged to requesters who make a
commercial use request. Review fees will be charged only for the
initial record review--in other words, the review done when NSF
determines whether an exemption applies to a particular record or
record portion at the initial request level. NSF may charge for review
even if a record ultimately is not disclosed. No charge will be made
for review at the administrative appeal level for an exemption already
applied. However, records or record portions withheld under an
exemption that is subsequently determined not to apply may be reviewed
again to determine whether any other exemption not previously
considered applies; the costs of that review are chargeable where it is
made necessary by a change of circumstances. Review fees will be
charged at the salary rate (basic pay plus 16%) of the employee(s)
performing the review.
(d) Limitations on charging fees. (1) No search fee will be charged
for requests by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the news media.
(2) Except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use, NSF
will provide without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent);
and
(ii) The first two hours of search (or the cost equivalent).
(3) Whenever a total fee calculated under paragraph (c) of this
section is $25.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged.
(4) The provisions of paragraphs (d) (2) and (3) of this section
work together. This means that noncommercial requesters will be charged
no fees unless the cost of search in excess of two hours plus the cost
of duplication in excess of 100 pages totals more than $25.00.
Commercial requesters will not be charged unless the costs of search,
review, and duplication total more than $25.00.
[[Page 16822]]
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $25.00. When NSF
determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section
will exceed $25.00, it will notify the requester of the actual or
estimated amount of the fees, unless the requester has indicated a
willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. If only a portion
of the fee can be estimated readily, NSF will advise the requester that
the estimated fee may be only a portion of the total fee. In cases in
which a requester has been notified that actual or estimated fees
exceed $25.00, the request will not be considered perfected and further
work will not be done until the requester agrees to pay the anticipated
total fee. Any such agreement should be memorialized in writing. A
notice under this paragraph will offer the requester an opportunity to
discuss the matter with Foundation personnel in order to reformulate
the request to meet the requester's needs at a lower cost, if possible.
If a requester fails to respond within 60 days of notice of actual or
estimated fees with an agreement to pay those fees, NSF may
administratively close the request.
(f) Charges for other services. Apart from the other provisions of
this section, when NSF chooses as a matter of administrative discretion
to provide a requested special service--such as certifying that records
are true copies or sending them by other than ordinary mail--the direct
costs of providing the service will be charged to the requester.
(g) Charging interest. NSF may charge interest on any unpaid bill
starting on the 31st day following the date of billing the requester.
Interest charges will be assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C.
3717 and will accrue from the date of the billing until payment is
received by NSF. NSF will follow the provisions of the Debt Collection
Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended, and its
administrative procedures, including the use of consumer reporting
agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. Where NSF reasonably believes that a
requester or a group of requesters acting together is attempting to
divide a request into a series of requests for the purpose of avoiding
fees, the agency may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly.
NSF may presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30-
day period have been made in order to avoid fees. Where requests are
separated by a longer period, NSF will aggregate them only where there
exists a solid basis for determining that aggregation is warranted
under all the circumstances involved. Multiple requests involving
unrelated matters will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described
in paragraphs (i)(2) and (3) of this section, NSF will not require the
requester to make an advance payment--in other words, a payment made
before work is begun or continued on a request. Payment owed for work
already completed (i.e., a prepayment before copies are sent to a
requester) is not an advance payment.
(2) Where NSF determines or estimates that a total fee to be
charged under this section will be more than $250.00, it may require
the requester to make an advance payment of an amount up to the amount
of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request,
except where it receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from
a requester that has a history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly
charged fee to any agency within 30 days of the date of billing, NSF
may require the requester to pay the full amount due, plus any
applicable interest, and to make an advance payment of the full amount
of any anticipated fee, before NSF begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request from that requester.
(4) In cases in which NSF requires advance payment or payment due
under paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the request will not be
considered perfected and further work will not be done on it until the
required payment is received.
(j) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any
statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees
for particular types of records. Where records responsive to requests
are maintained for distribution by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, NSF will inform requesters of the steps
for obtaining records from those sources so that they may do so most
economically.
(k) Waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive to a
request will be furnished without charge or at a charge reduced below
that established under paragraph (c) of this section where NSF
determines, based on all available information, that disclosure of the
requested information is in the public interest because it is likely to
contribute significantly to public understanding of the operations or
activities of the government and is not primarily in the commercial
interest of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the first fee waiver requirement is met,
NSF will consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the
requested records concerns ``the operations or activities of the
government.'' The subject of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed:
Whether disclosure is ``likely to contribute'' to an understanding of
government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government
operations or activities in order to be ``likely to contribute'' to an
increased public understanding of those operations or activities.
Disclosure of information already in the public domain, in either
duplicative or substantially identical form, is unlikely to contribute
to such understanding where nothing new would be added to the public's
understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the
requested information will contribute to ``public understanding.'' The
disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the subject as opposed to the
individual understanding of the requester. A requester's expertise in
the subject area and ability and intention to effectively convey
information to the public will be considered. A representative of the
news media as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section will normally
be presumed to satisfy this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding:
Whether disclosure is likely to contribute ``significantly'' to public
understanding of government operations or activities. The public's
understanding of the subject in question must be enhanced by the
disclosure to a significant extent as compared to the level of public
understanding existing prior to the disclosure. NSF will make no value
judgments about whether information that would contribute significantly
to public understanding of the operations or activities of the
government is ``important'' enough to be made public.
(3) To determine whether the second fee waiver requirement is met,
NSF will consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether
the
[[Page 16823]]
requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. NSF will consider any commercial interest of the
requester (with reference to the definition of ``commercial use'' in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section), or of any person on whose behalf the
requester may be acting, that would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters will be given an opportunity in the
administrative process to provide explanatory information regarding
this consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether any identified
commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in
comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
``primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.'' A fee waiver
or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is
satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of
any identified commercial interest in disclosure. NSF ordinarily will
presume that where a news media requester has satisfied the public
interest standard, the public interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester. Disclosure to data brokers or
others who merely compile and market government information for direct
economic return will not be presumed to primarily serve the public
interest.
(4) Where only some of the requested records satisfy the
requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver will be granted for those
records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3) of this section, insofar as
they apply to each request.
Sec. 612.11 Other rights and services.
Nothing in this part will be construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which such
person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Dated: April 7, 2009.
Amy Northcutt,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-8262 Filed 4-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P