Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of 13 Southeastern Plant Species, 16230-16232 [E9-8078]
Download as PDF
16230
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 67 / Thursday, April 9, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5285–N–11]
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Comment Request; FHA–
Insured Mortgage Loan Servicing
Involving the Claims and Conveyance
Process, Property Inspection/
Preservation
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection requirement described below
will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The Department is
soliciting public comments on the
subject proposal.
DATES: Comments Due Date: June 8,
2009.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Lillian Deitzer, Departmental Reports
Management Officer, QDAM,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410; e-mail
Lillian_L._Deitzer@HUD.gov or
telephone (202) 402–8048.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donna Tomposki, Director, Valuation
Policy Division, Office of Single Family
Program Development, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410,
telephone (202) 708–2121 (this is not a
toll free number) for copies of the
proposed forms and other available
information.
ADDRESSES:
The
Department is submitting the proposed
information collection to OMB for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended).
This Notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information to: (1) Evaluate
whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Minimize the
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Apr 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond; including
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
This Notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposal: Appraisal Industry
Forms.
OMB Control Number, if Applicable:
2502–0538.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use: HUD
requires that appraisals and inspections
be performed on certain FHA insured
properties and the FHA Appraiser and
Inspector rosters assure that HUD has
the ability to track the performance of
appraisers and inspectors and sanction
those who are not performing
adequately, this is necessary to protect
the FHA insurance fund.
Agency Form Numbers, if Applicable:
HUD–92563I, HUD 92563A, HUD
92564–CN, Fannie Mae Forms: 1004,
1004c, 1004mc, 1025, 1073, 1075, 2055
1004MC.
Estimation of the Total Numbers of
Hours Needed to Prepare the
Information Collection Including
Number of Respondents, Frequency of
Response, and Hours of Response: The
number of burden hours is 25,184. The
number of respondents is 17,650, the
number of responses is 468,150, the
frequency of response is on occasion,
and the burden hour per response is less
than 15 minutes.
Status of the Proposed Information
Collection: This is an extension of a
currently approved collection.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C., Chapter 35, as amended.
Ronald Y. Spraker,
Acting General Deputy Assistant Secretary
for Housing—Deputy Federal Housing
Commissioner.
[FR Doc. E9–8031 Filed 4–8–09; 8:45 am]
announce their intent to prepare an
Environmental Assessment on the
Wasatch County Water Efficiency
Recycled Water Project. The project
would make recycled water, which
would be part of Central Utah Project
(CUP) water, available in the facilities of
the Wasatch County Water Efficiency
Project (WCWEP), Bonneville Unit,
CUP. It would provide an opportunity
for more effective and efficient
management of water, make efficient
use of recycled water as an additional
water supply, create opportunities to
exchange water for stream and wetland
benefits, and encourage the
conservation and wise use of water, all
of which are objectives of the Central
Utah Project Completion Act.
The proposed action would make
recycled water which would be part of
CUP water available in the WCWEP
facilities. All water supply
commitments under the existing
contracts and agreements will continue
to be met.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information pertaining to
this action may be obtained by
contacting Mr. Lynn Hansen, Program
Coordinator, Central Utah Project
Completion Act Office, 302 East 1860
South, Provo, Utah 84606, by calling
(801) 379–1238, or e-mail at
lhansen@uc.usbr.gov.
Dated: April 3, 2009.
Reed R. Murray,
Program Director, Central Utah Project
Completion Act, Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E9–8086 Filed 4–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–ES–2009–N0032]; [40120–1113–
0000–C4]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Status Reviews of
13 Southeastern Plant Species
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews;
request for information.
Central Utah Project Completion Act
AGENCIES: Department of the Interior,
Office of the Assistant Secretary—Water
and Science.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the
Wasatch County Water Efficiency
Recycled Water Project.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the
Central Utah Water Conservancy District
and the Department of the Interior
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) are initiating
5-year status reviews of 13 species
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act). We conduct
these reviews to ensure that the
classification of species as threatened or
endangered on the Lists of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife and Plants is
accurate. A 5-year review is an
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 67 / Thursday, April 9, 2009 / Notices
assessment of the best scientific and
commercial data available at the time of
the review.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to
conduct these reviews, we must receive
your comments or information on or
before June 8, 2009. However, we will
continue to accept new information
about any listed species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to
submit information and review
information we receive on these species,
see ‘‘Request for New Information.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
species-specific information, contact the
appropriate person under ‘‘Request for
New Information.’’
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we
maintain lists of endangered and
threatened wildlife and plant species in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 17.11 (for wildlife) and 17.12
(for plants) (collectively referred to as
the List). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act
requires that we conduct a review of
listed species at least once every 5 years.
Then, on the basis of such reviews,
under section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine
whether or not any species should be
removed from the Lists (delisted), or
reclassified from endangered to
threatened or from threatened to
endangered. If we consider delisting a
species, we must support the action by
the best scientific and commercial data
available, and we must consider if these
data substantiate that the species is
neither endangered nor threatened for
one or more of the following reasons: (1)
The species is considered extinct; (2)
the species is considered to be
recovered; and/or (3) the original data
available when the species was listed, or
the interpretation of such data, were in
error. Any change in Federal
classification requires a separate
rulemaking process. We make
amendments to the List in the CFR
through final rules published in the
Federal Register.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21
require that we publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing those
species currently under our active
review. This notice announces our
active review of 13 species that are
currently listed as endangered: The
Brooksville bellflower (Campanula
robinsiae), fragrant prickly-apple
(Cereus eriophorus var. fragrans),
pygmy fringe-tree (Chionanthus
pygmaeus), snakeroot (Eryngium
cuneifolium), Cooley’s water-willow
(Justicia cooleyi), scrub blazingstar
(Liatris ohlingerae), Britton’s beargrass
(Nolina brittoniana), Key tree-cactus
(Pilosocereus robinii), Lewton’s polygala
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Apr 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
(Polygala lewtonii), wireweed
(Polygonella basiramia), sandlace
(Polygonella myriophylla), Chapman’s
rhododendron (Rhododendron
chapmanii), and Florida torreya
(Torreya taxifolia). The List is also
available on our internet site at https://
endangered.fws.gov/
wildlife.html#Species.
What Information Do We Consider in a
5-Year Review?
A 5-year review considers the best
scientific and commercial data that have
become available since the current
listing determination or most recent
status review of each species, such as:
A. Species biology, including but not
limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics,
and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but
not limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have
been implemented to benefit the
species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five
factors under heading ‘‘How do we
determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened?’’); and
E. Other new information, data, or
corrections, including but not limited to
taxonomic or nomenclatural changes,
identification of erroneous information
contained in the List, and improved
analytical methods.
Definitions
A. Species includes any species or
subspecies of fish, wildlife, or plant,
and any distinct population segment of
any species of vertebrate which
interbreeds when mature.
B. Endangered means any species that
is in danger of extinction throughout all
or a significant portion of its range.
C. Threatened means any species that
is likely to become an endangered
species within the foreseeable future
throughout all or a significant portion of
its range.
How Do We Determine Whether a
Species Is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act establishes
that we determine whether a species is
endangered or threatened based on one
or more of the following five factors:
A. The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
B. Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16231
What Could Happen Because of This 5Year Review?
If we find that there is new
information concerning any of these 13
species indicating that a change in
classification may be warranted, we may
propose a new rule that could do one of
the following: (a) Reclassify the species
from endangered to threatened; (b)
reclassify the species from threatened to
endangered; or (c) delist the species. If
we determine that a change in
classification is not warranted, then the
species will remain on the List under its
current status.
Request for New Information
To do any of the following, contact
the person associated with the species
you are interested in below:
(a) To get more information on a
species,
(b) To submit information on a
species, or
(c) To review information we receive,
which will be available for public
inspection by appointment, during
normal business hours, at the listed
addresses.
• Brooksville bellflower, Cooley’s
water-willow, and Britton’s beargrass:
Sandy MacPherson, Jacksonville Field
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite 200,
Jacksonville, FL 32256–7517; fax: 904–
731–3045; telephone: 904/731–3328; email: sandy_macpherson@fws.gov.
• Fragrant prickly-apple, pygmy
fringe-tree, snakeroot, scrub blazingstar,
Key tree-cactus, Lewton’s polygala,
wireweed, and sandlace: Chris Belden,
South Florida Ecological Services
Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960;
fax: 772–562–4288; telephone: 772/562–
3909, ext. 237; e-mail:
chris_belden@fws.gov.
• Chapman’s rhododendron and
Florida torreya: Janet Mizzi, Panama
City Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1601 Balboa Avenue, Panama
City, FL 32405; fax: 850–763–2177;
telephone: 850/769–0552, ext. 247; email janet_mizzi@fws.gov
We request any new information
concerning the status of any of these 13
species. See ‘‘What Information Do We
Consider in a 5-Year Review?’’ heading
for specific criteria. Support your
information by documentation such as
maps, bibliographic references, methods
used to gather and analyze the data,
and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by
knowledgeable sources.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
16232
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 67 / Thursday, April 9, 2009 / Notices
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Authority
We publish this document under the
authority of the Endangered Species Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: February 25, 2009.
Michael L. Piccirilli,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E9–8078 Filed 4–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2009–N0059; 20124–
11130000–C2]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Recovery Plan for the Rio
Grande Silvery Minnow (Hybognathus
amarus)
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability:
draft amendment and supplement to the
2007 Draft revised recovery plan for Rio
Grande Silvery Minnow.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of an amendment and
supplement to our draft revised
Recovery Plan (Recovery Plan) for the
Rio Grande silvery minnow
(Hybognathus amarus) under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). The species currently
inhabits the Rio Grande in New Mexico
and has been introduced to the Big Bend
area of Texas. This amendment and
supplement consist of revised draft
recovery criteria and a population
viability assessment (PVA, or draft
Appendix H), respectively. We invite
public review and comment on these
documents. After review we will
incorporate the documents into the
Final Recovery Plan (the PVA as
Appendix H).
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive any comments no later
than May 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to review the
revised draft recovery criteria and PVA/
draft Appendix H, you may obtain a
copy from Jennifer Norris, Rio Grande
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Apr 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
Endangered Species Act Coordinator, by
U.S. mail at New Mexico Ecological
Services Field Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 2105 Osuna Road,
Albuquerque, NM 87113; by telephone
at 505–761–4710; by facsimile at 505–
346–2542; or by e-mail at:
Jennifer_Norris@fws.gov. You may also
download the documents from https://
www.fws.gov/endangered. For more on
obtaining and commenting on
documents, see ‘‘Document
Availability.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Norris, by telephone at 505–
761–4710, by any means under
ADDRESSES.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Rio Grande silvery minnow was
extirpated from about 93 percent of its
original range, persisting in only one
280-kilometer (km) ((174-mile (mi)))
reach of the Rio Grande in New Mexico,
from just downstream of Cochiti Dam to
the headwaters of the Elephant Butte
Reservoir. As part of our efforts to
recover the species, on December 17,
2008, we reintroduced Rio Grande
silvery minnows to the Big Bend area of
the Rio Grande under Section 10(j) of
the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (73 FR
74357, December 8, 2008). We listed the
species as federally endangered in 1994
(July 20, 1994, 59 FR 36988) and
designated critical habitat in 2003
(February 19, 2003, 68 FR 8088).
Throughout much of its historic range,
the decline of the Rio Grande silvery
minnow may be attributed in part to
destruction and modification of its
habitat due to dewatering and diversion
of water, water impoundment, and
modification of the river
(channelization). Competition and
predation by introduced non-native
species, water quality degradation, and
other factors may also have contributed
to its decline.
Restoring an endangered or
threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, selfsustaining member of its ecosystem is a
primary goal of our endangered species
program. To help guide the recovery
effort, we are working to prepare
recovery plans for most of the listed
species native to the United States.
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for conservation of
species, establish criteria for
downlisting or delisting them, and
estimate time and cost for implementing
the recovery measures. The recovery
criteria form the basis from which to
gauge the species’ recovery and
subsequent risk of extinction.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Our draft revised recovery plan,
which we announced and took
comments on in early 2007 (January 18,
2007, 72 FR 2301), includes scientific
information about the species and
provides criteria and actions needed to
reclassify or delist (recover) the species.
We may consider reclassifying the Rio
Grande silvery minnow from
endangered to threatened when three
populations (including at least two that
are self-sustaining) have been
established within the historical range
of the species and have been maintained
for at least 5 years each. We may
consider delisting when three selfsustaining populations have been
established within the historical range
of the species and have been maintained
for at least 10 years each. The revised
recovery criteria provide objective
measures by which we may determine
that populations of silvery minnow are
self-sustaining.
We finalized our original Rio Grande
Silvery Minnow Recovery Plan in 1999.
On January 18, 2007, we issued a notice
of availability and request for comments
on our draft revised plan (72 FR 2301).
After receiving and considering public
and peer review comments on the
original draft revised criteria, we
developed the revised criteria and PVA
document which we announce and
make available with this notice. We will
not re-release the draft revised plan and
take further comments. After
consideration of comments we received
during this public comment period, we
will finalize the recovery plan and make
it available to the public through a
Federal Register notice.
Document Availability
To download review copies of the
documents from the internet, go to
https://www.fws.gov/endangered and
find ‘‘Search For a Species:’’ in the leftside menu. Type ‘‘silvery minnow’’ in
the text box and click on ‘‘Search.’’
Although we are no longer accepting
comments on the January 2007 draft
revised recovery plan, a copy of the plan
may be useful for your review of the
revised draft criteria and PVA/draft
Appendix H. The draft revised recovery
plan may be also obtained through the
methods outlined above.
Comments and materials we receive
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the New Mexico Ecological
Services Field Office in Albuquerque
(see ADDRESSES).
Request for Public Comments
We are accepting written comments
and information during this comment
period on the revised draft recovery
E:\FR\FM\09APN1.SGM
09APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 67 (Thursday, April 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16230-16232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-8078]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-ES-2009-N0032]; [40120-1113-0000-C4]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 5-Year Status
Reviews of 13 Southeastern Plant Species
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) are
initiating 5-year status reviews of 13 species under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We conduct these reviews to
ensure that the classification of species as threatened or endangered
on the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants is
accurate. A 5-year review is an
[[Page 16231]]
assessment of the best scientific and commercial data available at the
time of the review.
DATES: To allow us adequate time to conduct these reviews, we must
receive your comments or information on or before June 8, 2009.
However, we will continue to accept new information about any listed
species at any time.
ADDRESSES: For instructions on how to submit information and review
information we receive on these species, see ``Request for New
Information.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For species-specific information,
contact the appropriate person under ``Request for New Information.''
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), we
maintain lists of endangered and threatened wildlife and plant species
in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.11 (for wildlife)
and 17.12 (for plants) (collectively referred to as the List). Section
4(c)(2)(A) of the Act requires that we conduct a review of listed
species at least once every 5 years. Then, on the basis of such
reviews, under section 4(c)(2)(B), we determine whether or not any
species should be removed from the Lists (delisted), or reclassified
from endangered to threatened or from threatened to endangered. If we
consider delisting a species, we must support the action by the best
scientific and commercial data available, and we must consider if these
data substantiate that the species is neither endangered nor threatened
for one or more of the following reasons: (1) The species is considered
extinct; (2) the species is considered to be recovered; and/or (3) the
original data available when the species was listed, or the
interpretation of such data, were in error. Any change in Federal
classification requires a separate rulemaking process. We make
amendments to the List in the CFR through final rules published in the
Federal Register.
Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 require that we publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing those species currently under our
active review. This notice announces our active review of 13 species
that are currently listed as endangered: The Brooksville bellflower
(Campanula robinsiae), fragrant prickly-apple (Cereus eriophorus var.
fragrans), pygmy fringe-tree (Chionanthus pygmaeus), snakeroot
(Eryngium cuneifolium), Cooley's water-willow (Justicia cooleyi), scrub
blazingstar (Liatris ohlingerae), Britton's beargrass (Nolina
brittoniana), Key tree-cactus (Pilosocereus robinii), Lewton's polygala
(Polygala lewtonii), wireweed (Polygonella basiramia), sandlace
(Polygonella myriophylla), Chapman's rhododendron (Rhododendron
chapmanii), and Florida torreya (Torreya taxifolia). The List is also
available on our internet site at https://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html#Species.
What Information Do We Consider in a 5-Year Review?
A 5-year review considers the best scientific and commercial data
that have become available since the current listing determination or
most recent status review of each species, such as:
A. Species biology, including but not limited to population trends,
distribution, abundance, demographics, and genetics;
B. Habitat conditions, including but not limited to amount,
distribution, and suitability;
C. Conservation measures that have been implemented to benefit the
species;
D. Threat status and trends (see five factors under heading ``How
do we determine whether a species is endangered or threatened?''); and
E. Other new information, data, or corrections, including but not
limited to taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, identification of
erroneous information contained in the List, and improved analytical
methods.
Definitions
A. Species includes any species or subspecies of fish, wildlife, or
plant, and any distinct population segment of any species of vertebrate
which interbreeds when mature.
B. Endangered means any species that is in danger of extinction
throughout all or a significant portion of its range.
C. Threatened means any species that is likely to become an
endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range.
How Do We Determine Whether a Species Is Endangered or Threatened?
Section 4(a)(1) of the Act establishes that we determine whether a
species is endangered or threatened based on one or more of the
following five factors:
A. The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range;
B. Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes;
C. Disease or predation;
D. The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms; or
E. Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence.
What Could Happen Because of This 5-Year Review?
If we find that there is new information concerning any of these 13
species indicating that a change in classification may be warranted, we
may propose a new rule that could do one of the following: (a)
Reclassify the species from endangered to threatened; (b) reclassify
the species from threatened to endangered; or (c) delist the species.
If we determine that a change in classification is not warranted, then
the species will remain on the List under its current status.
Request for New Information
To do any of the following, contact the person associated with the
species you are interested in below:
(a) To get more information on a species,
(b) To submit information on a species, or
(c) To review information we receive, which will be available for
public inspection by appointment, during normal business hours, at the
listed addresses.
Brooksville bellflower, Cooley's water-willow, and
Britton's beargrass: Sandy MacPherson, Jacksonville Field Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite 200,
Jacksonville, FL 32256-7517; fax: 904-731-3045; telephone: 904/731-
3328; e-mail: sandy_macpherson@fws.gov.
Fragrant prickly-apple, pygmy fringe-tree, snakeroot,
scrub blazingstar, Key tree-cactus, Lewton's polygala, wireweed, and
sandlace: Chris Belden, South Florida Ecological Services Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, FL 32960; fax:
772-562-4288; telephone: 772/562-3909, ext. 237; e-mail: chris_belden@fws.gov.
Chapman's rhododendron and Florida torreya: Janet Mizzi,
Panama City Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1601 Balboa
Avenue, Panama City, FL 32405; fax: 850-763-2177; telephone: 850/769-
0552, ext. 247; e-mail janet_mizzi@fws.gov
We request any new information concerning the status of any of
these 13 species. See ``What Information Do We Consider in a 5-Year
Review?'' heading for specific criteria. Support your information by
documentation such as maps, bibliographic references, methods used to
gather and analyze the data, and/or copies of any pertinent
publications, reports, or letters by knowledgeable sources.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other
[[Page 16232]]
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
We publish this document under the authority of the Endangered
Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: February 25, 2009.
Michael L. Piccirilli,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. E9-8078 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P