Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: 2009 Fellowships in the Arts: Documentary Filmmaking and Iraq Museum Residencies, 15817-15825 [E9-7849]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
and any sub-granting agreements must
be included in the proposal submission.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6569]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: 2009 Fellowships in the
Arts: Documentary Filmmaking and
Iraq Museum Residencies
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreements.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
PE/C/CU–09–49.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 12, 2009.
Executive Summary: The Cultural
Programs Division of the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for two
Cooperative Agreements to support
programs for short residency and
training programs in the United States
for emerging and mid-career
documentary filmmakers from around
the world and museum specialists from
Iraq. The Bureau anticipates that
approximately $900,000 will be
available to support this competition.
Grantees will design, develop, and
implement 30–60 day programs in the
United States for the selected
participants, individually or in small
groups. Each program should be built
around a residency experience, which
may be supplemented by other program
elements designed to enhance and
expand upon the activities of the
residency.
Proposed projects should transform
institutional and individual
understanding of key international, arts
and/or cultural issues, foster dialogue,
and develop professional expertise and
leadership capacity. Projects should be
structured to encourage American
professionals and their international
counterparts to develop a common
dialogue for dealing with shared
challenges and concerns.
The Bureau is interested in receiving
proposals from organizations with a
strong interest, thematic expertise,
institutional commitment, and a
successful track-record in conducting
international exchanges and in the
specific thematic field their proposal
addresses. Organizations that have the
expertise, interest, and institutional
commitment but lack the required
experience of conducting exchanges
may wish to consider developing
proposals based on consortia type
relationships with more experienced,
eligible organizations. Please note that
for these proposals, the role of each
organization must be clearly defined
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:20 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority:
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic,
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: This competition is based on
the premise that people-to-people
exchanges encourage and strengthen
understanding of democratic values and
nurture the cultural and social growth of
societies. Under this premise, the
Bureau offers a new funding
opportunity for organizations to develop
short residency and training programs
in the United States for emerging and
mid-career documentary filmmakers
from around the world and museum
professionals from Iraq. Proposals that
show strong prospects for enhancing
existing long-term collaborations or
establishing new collaborative efforts
among participating organizations will
be deemed more competitive under the
program planning criterion listed below.
The two project themes for which the
Bureau will accept proposals under this
competition are as follows: (1)
Documentary Filmmaker Fellowship
Program; and (2) Iraq Museum
Professional Residency Program.
Under this program, U.S. non-profit
organizations will conduct projects in
cooperation with the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Cultural Programs Division on the
themes listed above, with their
counterparts abroad for each project
theme. No guarantee is made or implied
that cooperative agreements will be
awarded in both themes.
In addition to describing extensive
expertise in the specific thematic area,
proposals should reflect a practical
understanding of global issues, and
demonstrate sensitivity to cultural,
political, economic, and social
differences in the specific world regions
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15817
in which the exchange project will
occur. Special attention should be given
to describing the applicant
organization’s experience with planning
and implementing people-to-people
international cultural exchange projects.
Applicants should outline their project
team’s capacity for successfully
implementing projects of this nature,
provide a detailed sample program and
time line to illustrate planning capacity
and ability to achieve program
objectives. Applicants must identify all
U.S. and foreign partner organizations
and/or venues with whom they are
proposing to collaborate, and describe
previous cooperative projects in the
section on ‘‘Institutional Capacity.’’ For
this competition, applicants must
include in their proposal supporting
materials or documentation that
demonstrates a minimum of five years
experience in conducting international
arts exchange programs and four years
experience in conducting exchange
programs with the U.S. Government.
Proposals must include references with
name and contact information for other
assistance awards the applicant has
received in the event the Bureau
chooses to be in touch directly.
Proposals should acknowledge U.S.
Embassy involvement in the participant
nomination process and the Cultural
Programs Division’s (ECA/PE/C/CU)
involvement in the final selection of all
participants.
For the 2009 Fellowships in the Arts,
U.S. non-profit organizations may
submit proposals for either one of the
two—but not both—project themes and
countries of exchange that are listed
below. Please note that for additional
information about this competition, a
contact program officer at ECA is listed
under each of the following two themes:
1. Documentary Filmmaker
Fellowship Program (not to exceed
$400,000):
Residency and Training cultural
exchange for foreign emerging
documentary filmmakers from countries
to be determined by ECA/PE/C/CU.
Program Contact: Susan Cohen, tel:
(202) 203–7509, e-mail:
CohenSL@state.gov with copy to:
ProctorLF@state.gov.
Project Goals:
ECA seeks programs that will provide
participants with in-depth exposure to
their professional discipline as
practiced in the U.S.; outreach to U.S.
colleagues and publics, particularly
youth, and; opportunities for creation
and presentation of their work. ECA will
select innovative programs for emerging
or mid-career professionals in
documentary filmmaking that will
introduce them to the diversity of
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
15818
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
cultural expression in the United States;
provide them with direct, hands-on
experience with new techniques and
technology in filmmaking; offer
opportunities for interaction with U.S.
filmmakers and other arts professionals;
assist them with the development of
their careers; familiarize them with the
business aspects of documentary
filmmaking, including measures to
protect artists’ rights, and; offer them
opportunities to share their work with
U.S. audiences. The Bureau is
particularly interested in program
components that will provide linkages
between participants and public school
students in the U.S.
Proposals should provide programs
for a group of twenty (20) participants.
The proposal should describe the
proposed program, explain how it
reflects the diversity of U.S. culture,
show how it responds to the needs and
interests of artists coming from a variety
of countries and backgrounds, and
demonstrate how it responds to ECA’s
goals.
Programs may be 30–60 days in
length. Applicants should explain their
rationale for the length of the program
proposed. Programs should be centered
on documentary filmmaking, should be
customized to meet the needs and
interests of the participants, and include
the foreign program participants as
peers of U.S. counterparts. Applicants
should include other activities that will
enhance the residency experience,
including site visits; meetings with U.S.
film directors, cinematographers, and
other arts professionals; public
presentations of program participants’
work, and; workshops for U.S. youth
and educators. All programs must
include the opportunity for participants
to create works and to share their
creation with U.S. colleagues and the
public, particularly youth. Program
activities complementary to the
residency may take place in one or more
locations in the U.S. This project does
not include program activities outside
the U.S. Participation in university
courses for credit may not be included
in proposals and participation in
conferences will be considered only if it
is clearly relevant to the professional
background of the participants and
represents only a small part of the
overall program. Programs that
exclusively involve participation in ‘offthe-shelf’ summer institutes or other
pre-structured training situations are not
acceptable and will not be funded.
The Bureau encourages public
presentation of participants’
documentary films and recognizes its
value to mutual understanding.
Proposals should therefore include
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
opportunities for presentations and for
public programs, such as panel
discussions, and other avenues for
program participants to discuss their
work with U.S. audiences. Programming
with U.S. public schools and/or other
educational institutions is strongly
encouraged.
Proposals should include a sample
program with day-by-day schedules. An
orientation session in Washington, D.C.
must be included that provides general
information about U.S. society and an
opportunity for ECA to meet and brief
newly arrived participants. A postprogram event, at a site to be
determined by grantee, that provides the
opportunity for presentation of newly
created documentaries and a de-briefing
session must also be included.
Participants:
Program participants will be emerging
or mid-career professional documentary
filmmakers, generally aged 20–40 years
from around the world. They should
have also demonstrated a commitment
to their profession as well as to
positively influencing their
communities, particularly minorities
and youth. In general, participants will
not have extensive or recent experience
in the U.S. ECA intends that the
program be highly competitive and that
a final selection of nominations will
result in a diverse mix of participants
from a variety of countries.
Applicants must state that they are
prepared to work with program
participants from any country or region
determined by ECA. ECA will determine
the priority or target countries for
recruitment of program participants. It
is unlikely that the Bureau will include
countries whose artistic film community
has substantial and ongoing contact
with its counterpart in the U.S., such as
Western Europe. Potential program
participants must have a working
knowledge of English sufficient to carry
out the residency program without
interpretation.
Participant Selection:
Foreign participants will be
nominated in two ways: By the
Department of State through a call for
nominations from U.S. Embassies and
posts, and; by the grantee organization,
which will utilize its own network of
contacts overseas (including film
industry, film associations) and its own
resources (such as U.S. filmmakers) to
make a concurrent call for nominations.
All participant applications will be
reviewed by a panel organized and
convoked by the grantee organization
and consisting of artists and art
professionals, and an ECA
representative as an observer.
Procedures for the nomination, selection
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of participants, and panel members
must be detailed in the proposal. ECA
will review and approve nominees prior
to and following panel consideration.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
—Enhance participant professional
capacity.
—Provide participants with an
appreciation and a greater
understanding and respect for diverse
cultures—focusing specifically on
U.S. society and culture. Provide
them a greater understanding of the
similarities, including shared values
between the U.S. and the foreign
countries.
—Provide participants an understanding
of how international cultural
exchange and networking can
positively influence their lives and
those of others and provide them the
tools to accomplish successful
networking.
—Provide a platform for dialogue and
development of enduring professional
ties between U.S. contacts and foreign
participants, as well as among foreign
participants.
—Enhance participant leadership
capacity and their ability to initiate
and support follow-on activities in
their home countries intended.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Work jointly with foreign and U.S.
partners and/or contacts to design,
develop, and execute a multi-regional
documentary film residency program of
professional development, artistic
enrichment and cross-cultural dialogue
that achieves the goals described above.
(2) Identify, screen, recruit, and select
twenty (20) foreign documentary
filmmakers from specified countries
fitting the above description.
(3) Provide a sound infrastructure for
coordination and implementation of the
entire program. This refers to both
substantive and administrative
components of the program, including
but not limited to: Fellowship and
workshop content and organization,
travel, housing, orientation, and visa
applications. Successful applicants will
also have U.S. partners able and willing
to provide cost-sharing (including inkind) in order to help cover program
costs.
(4) Design, build, and implement
intensive 30–60 day professional
residency filmmaking program in the
U.S. that will achieve program
objectives.
(5) Develop enhancement activities
and opportunities that reinforce
program goals after the participants
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
return to their home countries. Followon components could be public
presentations of films by program
participants. Applicants are directed to
review the PSI for additional
information on this criterion.
(6) Provide to ECA/PE/C/CU at the
conclusion of the program a Web-ready
package that will showcase participants’
involvement in the program as well as
feature the artistic product of their
residency.
ECA expects that this project will lead
to greater artist-to-artist and institutionto-institution contact as well as
collaboration across international
borders. Proposals should describe
mechanisms for measuring, supporting,
and enhancing this cooperation during
the grant period and beyond.
In the cooperative agreement, ECA/
PE/C/CU is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond
routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU
responsibilities for this program are as
follows:
› ECA/PE/C/CU will make a final
decision regarding countries for
recruitment of program participants.
› Embassies will be one channel for
nominations of program participants.
Grantee may propose names for
consideration by Embassy Public Affairs
Sections and will have the opportunity
to review the biographic information
submitted and advise if a specific
nominee does not appear to have
attained an appropriate professional
level of expertise.
› ECA/PE/C/CU will participate in
selection of final participants for the
program.
› ECA/PE/C/CU will review the
proposed residency, orientation and debriefing program schedules and provide
final approval.
› ECA/PE/C/CU will issue DS–2019s
needed for travel to the U.S. under the
J visa program.
› Following return to their home
countries, Embassies will showcase the
participating filmmakers and their work
developed during or resulting from their
experience in the U.S.
2. Iraq Museum Professional
Residency Program (not to exceed
$500,000):
Residency and Training cultural
exchange for Iraqi museum
professionals.
Program Contact: Alan Cross, tel:
(202) 203–7497, e-mail:
CrossA@state.gov with copy to:
BrooksMM@state.gov.
Project Description:
ECA seeks an organization to design
and implement residency programs that
will provide museum professionals from
Iraq with in-depth exposure to their
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:20 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
professional discipline as practiced in
the U.S.; outreach to U.S. colleagues and
publics, and; opportunities for
increasing mutual understanding
between the people of Iraq and the
United States. This residency program is
an integral component of the ‘Iraq
Cultural Heritage Project’ (ICHP), which
constitutes ECA’s major commitment to
that country’s cultural heritage. Over a
period of three years, approximately 50
emerging and mid-career Iraqi museum
professionals will participate in
approximately 50 residencies in the
United States designed to increase their
expertise in collections management,
cultural heritage conservation, digital
collections/tools, museum
administration, community engagement,
and institutional capacity building. The
programs will also be expected to
introduce them to the diversity of
cultural expression in the United States;
provide them with direct, hands-on
experience with new techniques and
technology in their field; offer them
opportunities for interaction with U.S.
museum professionals; familiarize them
with related fields, including private/
public partnerships, volunteerism, and
new technologies, and; offer them
opportunities to share their work with
U.S. audiences.
Programs will range from 30–60 days
in length and will be custom designed
by the grantee organization based on
input from ECA and/or ECA partners.
Residency programs will generally be
sought for individual museum
professionals, but could also be
requested for a defined small group of
museum professionals.
Proposals should include sample
programs with day-by-day schedules for
a 30-day residency. An orientation
session must be included that will
provide participants with general
information about the United States, its
form of government, society and culture.
A post-program session in Washington,
DC must also be included, providing the
possibility for de-briefing. When
possible and practicable, orientation
and de-briefing sessions should take
place in groups in order to make best
use of resources.
The project will entail working with
ECA and/or its designated partners in
planning and scheduling all events,
including:
› Arranging all air travel (domestic
and international) and local
transportation;
› Oversight of arrivals and
departures (international and/or
domestic);
› Preparation of briefing materials
for participants;
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15819
› Designing and planning
residencies as well as additional
activities;
› Coordinating escorts as necessary;
› Arranging payment for all costs
related to the residency program,
including those incurred by residency
hosts (museums or other identified civic
spaces), per diem and lodging for
participants; educational materials,
equipments or supplies; etc.
Program activities complementary to
the residency may take place in one or
more locations in the U.S. This project
does not include program activities
outside the U.S. Participation in
university courses for credit may not be
included in proposals and participation
in conferences will be considered only
if it is clearly relevant to the
professional background of the
participants and represents only a small
part of the overall program. Programs
that exclusively involve participation in
‘off-the-shelf’ summer institutes or other
pre-structured training situations are not
acceptable and will not be funded.
Any key U.S. partner institutions
should be identified and letters of
support should be provided in the
proposal.
Participants:
Program participants will be emerging
and mid-career museum professionals,
generally aged 20–40 years from Iraq.
They will have various levels of
experience in the museum field and, in
general, will not have extensive
experience in the United States.
Potential program participants must
have a working knowledge of English
sufficient to carry out the residency
program without interpretation.
Participant Nomination and
Selection:
Foreign participants will be
nominated through different channels,
and will include but are not limited to:
Successful participants from other ICHP
projects, nominees from the U.S.
Embassy in Baghdad, and nominees
from other USG and Iraqi partners.
Grantee may also propose names for
consideration by the Public Affairs
Section of the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
Final selection of participants will be
made by ECA.
Successful programs will achieve the
following:
—Enhance participant professional
capacity.
—Provide a platform for dialogue and
development of enduring professional
ties between U.S. contacts and foreign
participants, as well as among foreign
participants.
—Enhance participant leadership
capacity and their ability to initiate
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
15820
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
and support follow-on activities in
their home countries intended.
—Provide participants with an
appreciation and a greater
understanding and respect for diverse
cultures—focusing specifically on
U.S. society and culture. Provide
them a greater understanding of the
similarities, including shared values
between the U.S. and Iraq.
—Provide participants an understanding
of how international cultural
exchange and networking can
positively influence their lives and
those of others and provide them the
tools to accomplish successful
networking.
Successful applicants must fully
demonstrate a capacity to achieve the
following:
(1) Work jointly with foreign and U.S.
partners and/or contacts to design,
develop, and execute a variety of
museum residency programs for
professional development, artistic
enrichment and cross-cultural dialogue
that achieve the goals described above.
(2) Provide a sound infrastructure for
coordination and implementation of the
entire program. This refers to both
substantive and administrative
components of the program, including
but not limited to: Fellowship and
workshops content and organization,
international and domestic travel,
housing, orientation, and visa
applications. Successful applicants will
also have U.S. partners able and willing
to provide cost-sharing (including inkind) in order to help cover program
costs.
(3) Design, build, and implement
intensive 30–60 day museum residency
programs in the U.S. that will achieve
program objectives.
(4) Develop enhancement activities
and opportunities that reinforce
program goals after the participants
return to their home countries. Followon components could be public
presentations by program participants.
Applicants are encouraged to review the
PSI for additional information regarding
this criterion.
(5) Show understanding of the
challenges of collaboration in the design
and implementation of the residency
programs and propose means for
addressing them.
ECA expects that this project will lead
to greater person-to-person and
institution-to-institution contact as well
as collaboration across international
borders. Proposals should describe
mechanisms for measuring, supporting
and enhancing this cooperation during
the grant period and beyond.
In the cooperative agreement, ECA/
PE/C/CU is substantially involved in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
program activities above and beyond
routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU
responsibilities for this program are as
follows:
fi ECA/PE/C/CU will make the final
determination of program participants.
Participants will be nominated as stated
previously.
fi ECA/PE/C/CU will review the
proposed residencies, orientation and
de-briefing program schedules, and
provide final approval.
fi Where applicable, ECA/PE/C/CU
will issue DS–2019s needed for travel to
the U.S. under the J visa program.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreements. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2009.
Approximate Total Funding:
$900,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 2.
Approximate Average Award:
Project 1: $400,000.
Project 2: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September
1, 2009.
Anticipated Project Completion Dates:
December 30, 2010 for documentary
residency; December 30, 2012 for Iraq
museum residency.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants:
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing,
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require
that organizations with less than four
years experience in conducting
international exchanges be limited to
$60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA
anticipates making two separate awards,
in amounts up to $500,000 to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
(b) Proposals must demonstrate that
an applicant has an established resource
base of programming contacts and the
ability to keep this resource base
continuously updated. This resource
base should include but is not limited
to thematically related institutions (e.g.,
film organizations and museums),
speakers, thematic specialists, and
practitioners in a wide range of
professional fields in both private and
public sectors.
(c) Technical Eligibility: All proposals
must comply with the list of
requirements below or they will result
in your proposal being declared
technically ineligible and given no
further consideration in the review
process:
— Applicants may only submit one
proposal under this open competition.
Submission of more than one
proposal per applicant under this
open competition will render all
proposals by the applicant technically
ineligible and will not receive further
consideration in the review process.
— Proposals for Project 2 (Iraq Museum
Professionals Residency program) that
contain any other country will be
considered technically ineligible, and
will not receive further consideration
in the review process.
— For this competition, all eligible
organizations must demonstrate a
minimum of five years’ experience
successfully conducting international
arts exchange programs that involved
the exchange of participants, as well
as at least four years’ experience
successfully conducting international
programs with the U.S. Government.
— Key U.S. partner institutions and
their roles in the project must be
identified and letters of support
provided in the proposal.
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package:
Please contact the Cultural Programs
Division of the Office of Citizens’
Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs, ECA/PE/P/CU,
Room 569, U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, 202–703–7488,
fax: 202–203–7525,
ProctorLM@state.gov, to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/
C/CU–09–49 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request. Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Susan Cohen and refer
to the Funding Opportunity Number
ECA/PE/C/CU–09–49 located at the top
of this announcement on all other
inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package via Internet:
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA Federal
assistance awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all Regulations
Governing the J Visa
The Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the security and
proper administration of the Exchange
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15821
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by award recipients and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
ECA/PE/C/CU will be responsible for
issuing DS–2019 forms to participants
in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD–SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau’s authorizing
legislation, programs must maintain a
non-political character and should be
balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social,
and cultural life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be
interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but
not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socioeconomic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
15822
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and
Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to
monitor and evaluate the project’s
success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. The
Bureau recommends that your proposal
include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives. The Bureau
expects that the recipient organization
will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation
questions, including satisfaction with
the program, learning as a result of the
program, changes in behavior as a result
of the program, and effects of the
program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3d.4 Describe your plans for: i.e.
Sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other
requirements, etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1 Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Budget requests may not
exceed $400,000 for project 1 or
$500,000 for project 2. There must be a
summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and
program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each
program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification.
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV.3e.2 Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) Lodging, per diem, and other
expenses related to foreign participation
in residency programs;
(2) Design and implementation of
residency program (including, as
appropriate, staff, administrative
expenses, educational expenses,
supplies, equipment, production costs
for filmmaking project, orientation and
de-briefing costs, etc.);
(3) International and domestic travel
and transportation;
(4) Other costs related to programs
complementary to the residency
program, including presentations to
public schools, panels, etc.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: May 12,
2009.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU–
09–49.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne
Express, or U.S. Postal Service Express
Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.,
below rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in these RFGPs, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and nine (9) copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/PE/C/CU–09–49, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at
the U.S. Embassy(ies) for its(their)
review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic
Applications
Applicants have the option of
submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in
the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the system.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages
organizations interested in applying for this
competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1.
above, rather than submitting electronically
through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high
volume of grant proposals that will be
submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package.
As stated in these RFGPs, ECA bears no
responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for
proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted.
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday,
7 a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight
(12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the
difference between a submission receipt
and a submission validation. Applicants
will receive a validation e-mail from
grants.gov upon the successful
submission of an application. Again,
validation of an electronic submission
via Grants.gov can take up to two
business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15823
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Optional—IV.3f. You may also state
here any limitations on the number of
applications that an applicant may
submit and make it clear whether the
limitation is on the submitting
organization, individual program
director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards (cooperative agreements) resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria:
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program planning: Detailed agenda
and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan
should adhere to the program overview
and guidelines described above.
2. Ability to Achieve Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Proposals should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
15824
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposed
personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project’s goals.
5. Institution’s Record/Ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau awards
(grants or cooperative agreements) as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize costsharing through other private sector
support as well as institutional direct
funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices:
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a
Federal Assistance Award (FAA) from
the Bureau’s Grants Office. The FAA
and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b The following additional
requirements apply to this project:
A critical component of current U.S.
government Iran policy is the support
for indigenous Iranian voices. The State
Department has made the awarding of
grants for this purpose a key component
of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has
requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate
the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571,
582, and 635(b) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18
U.S.C. §§ 2339A and 2339B; Executive
Order 13224; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department will collect
information from grantees and subgrantees regarding the identity and
background of their key employees and
Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact Jill Staggs—Iran
Coordinator at 202–203–7500 or
StaggsJJ@state.gov, for additional
information.
All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
Jill Staggs—at 202–203–7500 or
StaggsJJ@state.gov for additional information.
Special Provision for Performance in a
Designated Combat Area (Currently
Iraq and Afghanistan) (December 2008)
All Recipient personnel deploying to
areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense
(currently Iraq and Afghanistan), under
assistance awards over $100,000 or
performance over 14 days must register
in the Department of Defense
maintained Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker
(SPOT) system. Recipients of Federal
assistance awards shall register in SPOT
before deployment, or if already in the
designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the
assistance award, and maintain current
data in SPOT. Information on how to
register in SPOT will be available from
your Grants Officer or Grants Officer
Representative during the final
negotiation and approval stages in the
Federal assistance awards process.
Recipients of Federal assistance awards
are advised that adherence to this policy
and procedure will be a requirement of
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
all final Federal assistance awards
issued by ECA.
Recipient performance may require
the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such
private security contractors (PSCs) are
required, grantees are required to ensure
they adhere to Chief of Mission (COM)
policies and procedures regarding the
operation, oversight, and accountability
of PSCs.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus nine (9) copies of the
following reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 65 / Tuesday, April 7, 2009 / Notices
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
Program Data Requirements:
Award recipients will be required to
maintain specific data on program
participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact
information, and biographic sketch of
all persons who travel internationally
on funds provided by the agreement or
who benefit from the award funding but
do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Susan Cohen,
Cultural Programs Division, ECA/PE/C/
CU, Room 568, ECA/PE/C/CU–09–49,
U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301
4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
202–203–7509, fax: 202–203–7525,
CohenSL@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/PE/C/
CU–09–49.
Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice:
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Apr 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
15825
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Dated: March 31, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–7849 Filed 4–6–09; 8:45 am]
Maritime Administration
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
[USCG–2007–28535]
Atlantic Sea Island Group LLC, Safe
Harbor Energy Liquefied Natural Gas
Deepwater Port License Application
Maritime Administration, DOT.
Notice of public meeting;
reopening of scoping comment period.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
ACTION:
[Public Notice 6571]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘An
Antiquity of Imagination: Tullio
Lombardo and Venetian High
Renaissance Sculpture’’
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), Executive Order 12047 of March
27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘An
Antiquity of Imagination: Tullio
Lombardo and Venetian High
Renaissance Sculpture,’’ imported from
abroad for temporary exhibition within
the United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to loan agreements with the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at the National
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on
or about July 4 until on or about October
31, 2009, and at possible additional
exhibitions or venues yet to be
determined, is in the national interest.
Public Notice of these Determinations is
ordered to be published in the Federal
Register.
For Further Information Contact: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Carol B.
Epstein, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the
Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State
(telephone: 202/453–8048). The address
is U.S. Department of State, SA–44, 301
4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington,
DC 20547–0001.
Dated: March 30, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–7856 Filed 4–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By Federal Register notice of
January 9, 2009 (74 FR 982–984) the
Maritime Administration and the Coast
Guard announced the intent to prepare
an environmental impact statement
(EIS) for the Atlantic Sea Island Group
LLC, Safe Harbor Energy liquefied
natural gas deepwater port license
application located in Federal Waters
approximately 13.5 miles south of the
City of Long Beach, New York, 19 miles
east of Highlands, New Jersey, and 23
miles southeast of the Ports of New York
and New Jersey. The proposed project
location is in the area between the
Ambrose-to-Nantucket and Hudson
Canyon-to-Ambrose shipping lanes,
located at approximately 40°23′ N and
73°36 W, in water depth of between 60
and 70 feet covering an area known as
Cholera Bank.
The EIS will be prepared with the
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
as a cooperating agency in the
environmental review with the Coast
Guard. The EIS will meet the
requirements of both the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the New York State Environmental
Quality Review Act (SEQRA). In
addition, the Coast Guard and the
Maritime Administration will be
working with appropriate state agency
representatives from New Jersey to
ensure potential impacts and concerns
of New Jersey are addressed in the EIS.
The Maritime Administration and
Coast Guard held public scoping
meetings for the Safe Harbor Energy
liquefied natural gas deepwater port
license application on January 27, 2009
in Eatontown, New Jersey, as well as on
January 29, 2009 in Long Beach, New
York. In addition, the scoping comment
period was extended an additional 30
days by the Maritime Administration
and Coast Guard to accommodate
several requests for the scoping
comment period extension. The scoping
comment period closed on March 11,
2009. However, this notice announces
the reopening of the scoping comment
period, a public meeting to be held in
connection with the EIS, and request for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 7, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15817-15825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7849]
[[Page 15817]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6569]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: 2009 Fellowships in the Arts: Documentary Filmmaking
and Iraq Museum Residencies
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreements.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: May 12, 2009.
Executive Summary: The Cultural Programs Division of the Office of
Citizen Exchanges in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs
announces an open competition for two Cooperative Agreements to support
programs for short residency and training programs in the United States
for emerging and mid-career documentary filmmakers from around the
world and museum specialists from Iraq. The Bureau anticipates that
approximately $900,000 will be available to support this competition.
Grantees will design, develop, and implement 30-60 day programs in the
United States for the selected participants, individually or in small
groups. Each program should be built around a residency experience,
which may be supplemented by other program elements designed to enhance
and expand upon the activities of the residency.
Proposed projects should transform institutional and individual
understanding of key international, arts and/or cultural issues, foster
dialogue, and develop professional expertise and leadership capacity.
Projects should be structured to encourage American professionals and
their international counterparts to develop a common dialogue for
dealing with shared challenges and concerns.
The Bureau is interested in receiving proposals from organizations
with a strong interest, thematic expertise, institutional commitment,
and a successful track-record in conducting international exchanges and
in the specific thematic field their proposal addresses. Organizations
that have the expertise, interest, and institutional commitment but
lack the required experience of conducting exchanges may wish to
consider developing proposals based on consortia type relationships
with more experienced, eligible organizations. Please note that for
these proposals, the role of each organization must be clearly defined
and any sub-granting agreements must be included in the proposal
submission.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority:
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic, and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: This competition is based on the premise that people-to-
people exchanges encourage and strengthen understanding of democratic
values and nurture the cultural and social growth of societies. Under
this premise, the Bureau offers a new funding opportunity for
organizations to develop short residency and training programs in the
United States for emerging and mid-career documentary filmmakers from
around the world and museum professionals from Iraq. Proposals that
show strong prospects for enhancing existing long-term collaborations
or establishing new collaborative efforts among participating
organizations will be deemed more competitive under the program
planning criterion listed below.
The two project themes for which the Bureau will accept proposals
under this competition are as follows: (1) Documentary Filmmaker
Fellowship Program; and (2) Iraq Museum Professional Residency Program.
Under this program, U.S. non-profit organizations will conduct
projects in cooperation with the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Cultural Programs Division on the themes listed above, with
their counterparts abroad for each project theme. No guarantee is made
or implied that cooperative agreements will be awarded in both themes.
In addition to describing extensive expertise in the specific
thematic area, proposals should reflect a practical understanding of
global issues, and demonstrate sensitivity to cultural, political,
economic, and social differences in the specific world regions in which
the exchange project will occur. Special attention should be given to
describing the applicant organization's experience with planning and
implementing people-to-people international cultural exchange projects.
Applicants should outline their project team's capacity for
successfully implementing projects of this nature, provide a detailed
sample program and time line to illustrate planning capacity and
ability to achieve program objectives. Applicants must identify all
U.S. and foreign partner organizations and/or venues with whom they are
proposing to collaborate, and describe previous cooperative projects in
the section on ``Institutional Capacity.'' For this competition,
applicants must include in their proposal supporting materials or
documentation that demonstrates a minimum of five years experience in
conducting international arts exchange programs and four years
experience in conducting exchange programs with the U.S. Government.
Proposals must include references with name and contact information for
other assistance awards the applicant has received in the event the
Bureau chooses to be in touch directly.
Proposals should acknowledge U.S. Embassy involvement in the
participant nomination process and the Cultural Programs Division's
(ECA/PE/C/CU) involvement in the final selection of all participants.
For the 2009 Fellowships in the Arts, U.S. non-profit organizations
may submit proposals for either one of the two--but not both--project
themes and countries of exchange that are listed below. Please note
that for additional information about this competition, a contact
program officer at ECA is listed under each of the following two
themes:
1. Documentary Filmmaker Fellowship Program (not to exceed
$400,000):
Residency and Training cultural exchange for foreign emerging
documentary filmmakers from countries to be determined by ECA/PE/C/CU.
Program Contact: Susan Cohen, tel: (202) 203-7509, e-mail:
CohenSL@state.gov with copy to: ProctorLF@state.gov.
Project Goals:
ECA seeks programs that will provide participants with in-depth
exposure to their professional discipline as practiced in the U.S.;
outreach to U.S. colleagues and publics, particularly youth, and;
opportunities for creation and presentation of their work. ECA will
select innovative programs for emerging or mid-career professionals in
documentary filmmaking that will introduce them to the diversity of
[[Page 15818]]
cultural expression in the United States; provide them with direct,
hands-on experience with new techniques and technology in filmmaking;
offer opportunities for interaction with U.S. filmmakers and other arts
professionals; assist them with the development of their careers;
familiarize them with the business aspects of documentary filmmaking,
including measures to protect artists' rights, and; offer them
opportunities to share their work with U.S. audiences. The Bureau is
particularly interested in program components that will provide
linkages between participants and public school students in the U.S.
Proposals should provide programs for a group of twenty (20)
participants. The proposal should describe the proposed program,
explain how it reflects the diversity of U.S. culture, show how it
responds to the needs and interests of artists coming from a variety of
countries and backgrounds, and demonstrate how it responds to ECA's
goals.
Programs may be 30-60 days in length. Applicants should explain
their rationale for the length of the program proposed. Programs should
be centered on documentary filmmaking, should be customized to meet the
needs and interests of the participants, and include the foreign
program participants as peers of U.S. counterparts. Applicants should
include other activities that will enhance the residency experience,
including site visits; meetings with U.S. film directors,
cinematographers, and other arts professionals; public presentations of
program participants' work, and; workshops for U.S. youth and
educators. All programs must include the opportunity for participants
to create works and to share their creation with U.S. colleagues and
the public, particularly youth. Program activities complementary to the
residency may take place in one or more locations in the U.S. This
project does not include program activities outside the U.S.
Participation in university courses for credit may not be included in
proposals and participation in conferences will be considered only if
it is clearly relevant to the professional background of the
participants and represents only a small part of the overall program.
Programs that exclusively involve participation in `off-the-shelf'
summer institutes or other pre-structured training situations are not
acceptable and will not be funded.
The Bureau encourages public presentation of participants'
documentary films and recognizes its value to mutual understanding.
Proposals should therefore include opportunities for presentations and
for public programs, such as panel discussions, and other avenues for
program participants to discuss their work with U.S. audiences.
Programming with U.S. public schools and/or other educational
institutions is strongly encouraged.
Proposals should include a sample program with day-by-day
schedules. An orientation session in Washington, D.C. must be included
that provides general information about U.S. society and an opportunity
for ECA to meet and brief newly arrived participants. A post-program
event, at a site to be determined by grantee, that provides the
opportunity for presentation of newly created documentaries and a de-
briefing session must also be included.
Participants:
Program participants will be emerging or mid-career professional
documentary filmmakers, generally aged 20-40 years from around the
world. They should have also demonstrated a commitment to their
profession as well as to positively influencing their communities,
particularly minorities and youth. In general, participants will not
have extensive or recent experience in the U.S. ECA intends that the
program be highly competitive and that a final selection of nominations
will result in a diverse mix of participants from a variety of
countries.
Applicants must state that they are prepared to work with program
participants from any country or region determined by ECA. ECA will
determine the priority or target countries for recruitment of program
participants. It is unlikely that the Bureau will include countries
whose artistic film community has substantial and ongoing contact with
its counterpart in the U.S., such as Western Europe. Potential program
participants must have a working knowledge of English sufficient to
carry out the residency program without interpretation.
Participant Selection:
Foreign participants will be nominated in two ways: By the
Department of State through a call for nominations from U.S. Embassies
and posts, and; by the grantee organization, which will utilize its own
network of contacts overseas (including film industry, film
associations) and its own resources (such as U.S. filmmakers) to make a
concurrent call for nominations. All participant applications will be
reviewed by a panel organized and convoked by the grantee organization
and consisting of artists and art professionals, and an ECA
representative as an observer. Procedures for the nomination, selection
of participants, and panel members must be detailed in the proposal.
ECA will review and approve nominees prior to and following panel
consideration.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
--Enhance participant professional capacity.
--Provide participants with an appreciation and a greater understanding
and respect for diverse cultures--focusing specifically on U.S. society
and culture. Provide them a greater understanding of the similarities,
including shared values between the U.S. and the foreign countries.
--Provide participants an understanding of how international cultural
exchange and networking can positively influence their lives and those
of others and provide them the tools to accomplish successful
networking.
--Provide a platform for dialogue and development of enduring
professional ties between U.S. contacts and foreign participants, as
well as among foreign participants.
--Enhance participant leadership capacity and their ability to initiate
and support follow-on activities in their home countries intended.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Work jointly with foreign and U.S. partners and/or contacts to
design, develop, and execute a multi-regional documentary film
residency program of professional development, artistic enrichment and
cross-cultural dialogue that achieves the goals described above.
(2) Identify, screen, recruit, and select twenty (20) foreign
documentary filmmakers from specified countries fitting the above
description.
(3) Provide a sound infrastructure for coordination and
implementation of the entire program. This refers to both substantive
and administrative components of the program, including but not limited
to: Fellowship and workshop content and organization, travel, housing,
orientation, and visa applications. Successful applicants will also
have U.S. partners able and willing to provide cost-sharing (including
in-kind) in order to help cover program costs.
(4) Design, build, and implement intensive 30-60 day professional
residency filmmaking program in the U.S. that will achieve program
objectives.
(5) Develop enhancement activities and opportunities that reinforce
program goals after the participants
[[Page 15819]]
return to their home countries. Follow-on components could be public
presentations of films by program participants. Applicants are directed
to review the PSI for additional information on this criterion.
(6) Provide to ECA/PE/C/CU at the conclusion of the program a Web-
ready package that will showcase participants' involvement in the
program as well as feature the artistic product of their residency.
ECA expects that this project will lead to greater artist-to-artist
and institution-to-institution contact as well as collaboration across
international borders. Proposals should describe mechanisms for
measuring, supporting, and enhancing this cooperation during the grant
period and beyond.
In the cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/C/CU is substantially involved
in program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU
responsibilities for this program are as follows:
[dec221] ECA/PE/C/CU will make a final decision regarding countries
for recruitment of program participants.
[dec221] Embassies will be one channel for nominations of program
participants. Grantee may propose names for consideration by Embassy
Public Affairs Sections and will have the opportunity to review the
biographic information submitted and advise if a specific nominee does
not appear to have attained an appropriate professional level of
expertise.
[dec221] ECA/PE/C/CU will participate in selection of final
participants for the program.
[dec221] ECA/PE/C/CU will review the proposed residency,
orientation and de-briefing program schedules and provide final
approval.
[dec221] ECA/PE/C/CU will issue DS-2019s needed for travel to the
U.S. under the J visa program.
[dec221] Following return to their home countries, Embassies will
showcase the participating filmmakers and their work developed during
or resulting from their experience in the U.S.
2. Iraq Museum Professional Residency Program (not to exceed
$500,000):
Residency and Training cultural exchange for Iraqi museum
professionals.
Program Contact: Alan Cross, tel: (202) 203-7497, e-mail:
CrossA@state.gov with copy to: BrooksMM@state.gov.
Project Description:
ECA seeks an organization to design and implement residency
programs that will provide museum professionals from Iraq with in-depth
exposure to their professional discipline as practiced in the U.S.;
outreach to U.S. colleagues and publics, and; opportunities for
increasing mutual understanding between the people of Iraq and the
United States. This residency program is an integral component of the
`Iraq Cultural Heritage Project' (ICHP), which constitutes ECA's major
commitment to that country's cultural heritage. Over a period of three
years, approximately 50 emerging and mid-career Iraqi museum
professionals will participate in approximately 50 residencies in the
United States designed to increase their expertise in collections
management, cultural heritage conservation, digital collections/tools,
museum administration, community engagement, and institutional capacity
building. The programs will also be expected to introduce them to the
diversity of cultural expression in the United States; provide them
with direct, hands-on experience with new techniques and technology in
their field; offer them opportunities for interaction with U.S. museum
professionals; familiarize them with related fields, including private/
public partnerships, volunteerism, and new technologies, and; offer
them opportunities to share their work with U.S. audiences.
Programs will range from 30-60 days in length and will be custom
designed by the grantee organization based on input from ECA and/or ECA
partners. Residency programs will generally be sought for individual
museum professionals, but could also be requested for a defined small
group of museum professionals.
Proposals should include sample programs with day-by-day schedules
for a 30-day residency. An orientation session must be included that
will provide participants with general information about the United
States, its form of government, society and culture. A post-program
session in Washington, DC must also be included, providing the
possibility for de-briefing. When possible and practicable, orientation
and de-briefing sessions should take place in groups in order to make
best use of resources.
The project will entail working with ECA and/or its designated
partners in planning and scheduling all events, including:
[dec221] Arranging all air travel (domestic and international) and
local transportation;
[dec221] Oversight of arrivals and departures (international and/or
domestic);
[dec221] Preparation of briefing materials for participants;
[dec221] Designing and planning residencies as well as additional
activities;
[dec221] Coordinating escorts as necessary;
[dec221] Arranging payment for all costs related to the residency
program, including those incurred by residency hosts (museums or other
identified civic spaces), per diem and lodging for participants;
educational materials, equipments or supplies; etc.
Program activities complementary to the residency may take place in
one or more locations in the U.S. This project does not include program
activities outside the U.S. Participation in university courses for
credit may not be included in proposals and participation in
conferences will be considered only if it is clearly relevant to the
professional background of the participants and represents only a small
part of the overall program. Programs that exclusively involve
participation in `off-the-shelf' summer institutes or other pre-
structured training situations are not acceptable and will not be
funded.
Any key U.S. partner institutions should be identified and letters
of support should be provided in the proposal.
Participants:
Program participants will be emerging and mid-career museum
professionals, generally aged 20-40 years from Iraq. They will have
various levels of experience in the museum field and, in general, will
not have extensive experience in the United States.
Potential program participants must have a working knowledge of
English sufficient to carry out the residency program without
interpretation.
Participant Nomination and Selection:
Foreign participants will be nominated through different channels,
and will include but are not limited to: Successful participants from
other ICHP projects, nominees from the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, and
nominees from other USG and Iraqi partners. Grantee may also propose
names for consideration by the Public Affairs Section of the U.S.
Embassy in Baghdad. Final selection of participants will be made by
ECA.
Successful programs will achieve the following:
--Enhance participant professional capacity.
--Provide a platform for dialogue and development of enduring
professional ties between U.S. contacts and foreign participants, as
well as among foreign participants.
--Enhance participant leadership capacity and their ability to initiate
[[Page 15820]]
and support follow-on activities in their home countries intended.
--Provide participants with an appreciation and a greater understanding
and respect for diverse cultures--focusing specifically on U.S. society
and culture. Provide them a greater understanding of the similarities,
including shared values between the U.S. and Iraq.
--Provide participants an understanding of how international cultural
exchange and networking can positively influence their lives and those
of others and provide them the tools to accomplish successful
networking.
Successful applicants must fully demonstrate a capacity to achieve
the following:
(1) Work jointly with foreign and U.S. partners and/or contacts to
design, develop, and execute a variety of museum residency programs for
professional development, artistic enrichment and cross-cultural
dialogue that achieve the goals described above.
(2) Provide a sound infrastructure for coordination and
implementation of the entire program. This refers to both substantive
and administrative components of the program, including but not limited
to: Fellowship and workshops content and organization, international
and domestic travel, housing, orientation, and visa applications.
Successful applicants will also have U.S. partners able and willing to
provide cost-sharing (including in-kind) in order to help cover program
costs.
(3) Design, build, and implement intensive 30-60 day museum
residency programs in the U.S. that will achieve program objectives.
(4) Develop enhancement activities and opportunities that reinforce
program goals after the participants return to their home countries.
Follow-on components could be public presentations by program
participants. Applicants are encouraged to review the PSI for
additional information regarding this criterion.
(5) Show understanding of the challenges of collaboration in the
design and implementation of the residency programs and propose means
for addressing them.
ECA expects that this project will lead to greater person-to-person
and institution-to-institution contact as well as collaboration across
international borders. Proposals should describe mechanisms for
measuring, supporting and enhancing this cooperation during the grant
period and beyond.
In the cooperative agreement, ECA/PE/C/CU is substantially involved
in program activities above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/PE/C/CU
responsibilities for this program are as follows:
[dec222] ECA/PE/C/CU will make the final determination of program
participants. Participants will be nominated as stated previously.
[dec222] ECA/PE/C/CU will review the proposed residencies,
orientation and de-briefing program schedules, and provide final
approval.
[dec222] Where applicable, ECA/PE/C/CU will issue DS-2019s needed
for travel to the U.S. under the J visa program.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreements. ECA's level of involvement
in this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2009.
Approximate Total Funding: $900,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 2.
Approximate Average Award:
Project 1: $400,000.
Project 2: $500,000.
Anticipated Award Date: September 1, 2009.
Anticipated Project Completion Dates: December 30, 2010 for
documentary residency; December 30, 2012 for Iraq museum residency.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants:
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 USC 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing, and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a) Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates making two
separate awards, in amounts up to $500,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
(b) Proposals must demonstrate that an applicant has an established
resource base of programming contacts and the ability to keep this
resource base continuously updated. This resource base should include
but is not limited to thematically related institutions (e.g., film
organizations and museums), speakers, thematic specialists, and
practitioners in a wide range of professional fields in both private
and public sectors.
(c) Technical Eligibility: All proposals must comply with the list
of requirements below or they will result in your proposal being
declared technically ineligible and given no further consideration in
the review process:
-- Applicants may only submit one proposal under this open competition.
Submission of more than one proposal per applicant under this open
competition will render all proposals by the applicant technically
ineligible and will not receive further consideration in the review
process.
-- Proposals for Project 2 (Iraq Museum Professionals Residency
program) that contain any other country will be considered technically
ineligible, and will not receive further consideration in the review
process.
-- For this competition, all eligible organizations must demonstrate a
minimum of five years' experience successfully conducting international
arts exchange programs that involved the exchange of participants, as
well as at least four years' experience successfully conducting
international programs with the U.S. Government.
-- Key U.S. partner institutions and their roles in the project must be
identified and letters of support provided in the proposal.
[[Page 15821]]
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package:
Please contact the Cultural Programs Division of the Office of
Citizens' Exchanges of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
ECA/PE/P/CU, Room 569, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20547, 202-703-7488, fax: 202-203-7525,
ProctorLM@state.gov, to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to
the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49 located at the top of
this announcement when making your request. Alternatively, an
electronic application package may be obtained from grants.gov. Please
see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
Please specify Susan Cohen and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49 located at the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package via Internet:
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please Refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA Federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to all Regulations Governing the J Visa
The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs places critically
important emphases on the security and proper administration of the
Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence by award recipients
and sponsors to all regulations governing the J visa. Therefore,
proposals should demonstrate the applicant's capacity to meet all
requirements governing the administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62, including the oversight of
Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival information
and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper
maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other
requirements.
ECA/PE/C/CU will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to
participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD-SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029,
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines
Pursuant to the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must
maintain a non-political character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of American political, social, and
cultural life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest
sense and encompass differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere
to the advancement of this principle both in program administration and
in program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the
`Support for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides
that ``in carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the
Bureau ``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
[[Page 15822]]
IV.3d.3 Program Monitoring and Evaluation
Proposals must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's
success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a description of a methodology to
use to link outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects
that the recipient organization will track participants or partners and
be able to respond to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction
with the program, learning as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4 Describe your plans for: i.e. Sustainability, overall
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any
other requirements, etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1 Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Budget requests may not exceed $400,000 for project 1
or $500,000 for project 2. There must be a summary budget as well as
breakdowns reflecting both administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate sub-budgets for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2 Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) Lodging, per diem, and other expenses related to foreign
participation in residency programs;
(2) Design and implementation of residency program (including, as
appropriate, staff, administrative expenses, educational expenses,
supplies, equipment, production costs for filmmaking project,
orientation and de-briefing costs, etc.);
(3) International and domestic travel and transportation;
(4) Other costs related to programs complementary to the residency
program, including presentations to public schools, panels, etc.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: May 12, 2009.
Reference Number: ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal
Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Please Note: ECA strongly encourages organizations interested
in applying for this competition to submit printed, hard copy
applications as outlined in section IV.3f.1., below rather than
submitting electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is
being made as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant
proposals that will be submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as
part of the Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in these RFGPs,
ECA bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from
transmission or conversion processes for proposals submitted via
Grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but
[[Page 15823]]
received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and nine (9) copies of the application should be sent
to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on a PC-formatted
disk. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. Embassy(ies) for
its(their) review.
IV.3f.2 Submitting Electronic Applications
Applicants have the option of submitting proposals electronically
through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation
packages are available at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the
system.
Please Note:
ECA strongly encourages organizations interested in applying for
this competition to submit printed, hard copy applications as
outlined in section IV.3f.1. above, rather than submitting
electronically through Grants.gov. This recommendation is being made
as a result of the anticipated high volume of grant proposals that
will be submitted via the Grants.gov Web portal as part of the
Recovery Act stimulus package. As stated in these RFGPs, ECA bears
no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes for proposals submitted via Grants.gov.
Please follow the instructions available in the ``Get Started''
portion of the site (https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted.
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726.
Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: grants.gov">support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation. Applicants will receive a
validation e-mail from grants.gov upon the successful submission of an
application. Again, validation of an electronic submission via
Grants.gov can take up to two business days. Therefore, we strongly
recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to begin the
submission process through Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
Optional--IV.3f. You may also state here any limitations on the
number of applications that an applicant may submit and make it clear
whether the limitation is on the submitting organization, individual
program director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards (cooperative agreements) resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria:
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Program planning: Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda
and plan should adhere to the program overview and guidelines described
above.
2. Ability to Achieve Program Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
[[Page 15824]]
4. Institutional Capacity: Proposed personnel and institutional
resources should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or
project's goals.
5. Institution's Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau awards (grants or cooperative agreements)
as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector
support as well as institutional direct funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices:
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive a Federal Assistance Award (FAA)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S. Government. The
FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient's responsible officer identified in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b The following additional requirements apply to this project:
A critical component of current U.S. government Iran policy is the
support for indigenous Iranian voices. The State Department has made
the awarding of grants for this purpose a key component of its Iran
policy. As a condition of licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b),
531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as
amended); 18 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 2339A and 2339B; Executive Order 13224;
and Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department conduct a vetting of potential
Iran grantees and sub-grantees for counter-terrorism purposes. To
conduct this vetting the Department will collect information from
grantees and sub-grantees regarding the identity and background of
their key employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran complies
with requirements, please contact Jill Staggs--Iran Coordinator at
202-203-7500 or StaggsJJ@state.gov, for additional information.
All awards made under this competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance to the
Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza. Organizations
must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before entering into
any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian organizations or
institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact
Jill Staggs--at 202-203-7500 or StaggsJJ@state.gov for additional
information.
Special Provision for Performance in a Designated Combat Area
(Currently Iraq and Afghanistan) (December 2008)
All Recipient personnel deploying to areas of combat operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense (currently Iraq and
Afghanistan), under assistance awards over $100,000 or performance over
14 days must register in the Department of Defense maintained
Synchronized Pre-deployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT) system.
Recipients of Federal assistance awards shall register in SPOT before
deployment, or if already in the designated operational area, register
upon becoming an employee under the assistance award, and maintain
current data in SPOT. Information on how to register in SPOT will be
available from your Grants Officer or Grants Officer Representative
during the final negotiation and approval stages in the Federal
assistance awards process. Recipients of Federal assistance awards are
advised that adherence to this policy and procedure will be a
requirement of all final Federal assistance awards issued by ECA.
Recipient performance may require the use of armed private security
personnel. To the extent that such private security contractors (PSCs)
are required, grantees are required to ensure they adhere to Chief of
Mission (COM) policies and procedures regarding the operation,
oversight, and accountability of PSCs.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements:
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus nine (9) copies of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
[[Page 15825]]
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Program Data Requirements:
Award recipients will be required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an electronically accessible
database format that can be shared with the Bureau as required. As a
minimum, the data must include the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information, and biographic sketch of
all persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the
agreement or who benefit from the award funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Susan Cohen,
Cultural Programs Division, ECA/PE/C/CU, Room 568, ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49,
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, 202-203-7509, fax: 202-203-7525, CohenSL@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/PE/C/CU-09-49.
Please read the complete announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff
may not discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice:
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: March 31, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-7849 Filed 4-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P