Economically Motivated Adulteration; Public Meeting; Request for Comment, 15497-15499 [E9-7843]
Download as PDF
15497
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–3794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Notice of Participation—(OMB Control
Number 0910–0191)—Extension
Section 12.45 (21 CFR 12.45), issued
under section 701 of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 371),
sets forth the format and procedures for
any interested person to file a petition
to participate in a formal evidentiary
hearing, either personally or through a
representative. Section 12.45 requires
that any person filing a notice of
participation, state their specific interest
in the proceedings, including the
specific issues of fact about which the
person desires to be heard. This section
also requires that the notice include a
statement that the person will present
testimony at the hearing and will
comply with specific requirements in 21
CFR 12.85, or, in the case of a hearing
before a Public Board of Inquiry,
concerning disclosure of data and
information by participants (21 CFR
13.25). In accordance with § 12.45(e),
the presiding officer may omit a
participant’s appearance.
The presiding officer and other
participants will use the collected
information in a hearing to identify
specific interests to be presented. This
preliminary information serves to
expedite the pre-hearing conference and
commits participation.
The respondents are individuals or
households, State or local governments,
not-for-profit institutions and
businesses, or other for-profit groups
and institutions.
In the Federal Register of December
29, 2008 (73 FR 79495), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting public
comment on the information collection
provisions. No comments were received.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Section 502 of the FFD&C Act/
Section 351 of the PHS Act
No. of
Respondents
12.45
1 There
8
Dated: March 30, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–7671 Filed 4–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0166]
Economically Motivated Adulteration;
Public Meeting; Request for Comment
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting;
request for comment.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Total Annual
Responses
1
Hours per
Response
8
Total Hours
3
24
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
The burden estimates for this
collection of information are based on
agency records and experience over the
past 3 years.
AGENCY:
Annual Frequency
per Response
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing a
public meeting pertaining to
economically motivated adulteration
(EMA). The purpose of the meeting is to
stimulate and focus a discussion about
ways in which the food (including
dietary supplements and animal food),
drug, medical device, and cosmetic
industries, regulatory agencies, and
other parties can better predict and
prevent economically motivated
adulteration with a focus on situations
that pose the greatest public health risk.
FDA invites interested individuals,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
organizations, and other stakeholders,
including industry representatives, to
present information pertaining to
predicting and preventing EMA of food
(including dietary supplements and
animal food), drugs, medical devices,
and cosmetics. The agency also requests
interested parties to submit comments
on this issue to the public docket.
DATES: The public meeting will be held
on May 1, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Submit written or electronic comments
by August 1, 2009. See section I of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
deadlines regarding the meeting.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be
held in the Wiley Auditorium, Center
for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park,
MD 20740–3835. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD, 20852. Submit
electronic comments to the docket at
https://www.regulations.gov. See section
V of this document for additional
information on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For registration, requests to make an
oral presentation, and submission
of written material for the
presentation: Deborah Harris, EDJ
Associates, Inc., 11300 Rockville
Pike, suite 1001, Rockville, MD
20852, 240–221–4326, FAX: 301–
945–4295, e-mail:
dharris@edjassociates.com.
For general questions about the
meeting, to request onsite parking
for the meeting, or for special
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
accommodations due to a
disability: Juanita Yates, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration
(HFS–009), 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
301–436–1731, e-mail:
Juanita.Yates@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. How to Participate in the Meeting
Due to limited space and time, we
encourage all persons who wish to
attend the meeting, including those
requesting an opportunity to make an
oral presentation at the meeting, to
register in advance. Attendees may
register in advance for the meeting by
April 23, 2009. Requests for oral
presentations should be made by April
16, 2009. Presenters should submit final
presentations by April 23, 2009, in order
for us to accommodate their request.
Requests for special accommodations
due to disability should be made by
April 23, 2009. Requests for onsite
parking may be made until April 27,
2009.
We encourage attendees to register for
this meeting electronically at https://
www.fda.gov/oc/meetings/ema.html.
You may also register by mail, fax, email, or telephone by providing
registration information (including
name, title, firm name, address,
telephone number, fax number, and email address) to the contact person (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Attendees will have an opportunity to
provide oral comments. Depending on
the number of oral presentations, we
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
15498
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
may need to limit the time of each oral
presentation (e.g., 5 minutes each).
Requests to make an oral presentation,
submission of written material for the
presentation, requests for special
accommodations due to disability, and
requests for onsite parking should be
directed to the contact person (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
II. Background on the Meeting
A. Suspected Economically Motivated
Adulteration of FDA-Regulated Products
For purposes of this public meeting,
FDA proposes a working definition of
EMA as the fraudulent, intentional
substitution or addition of a substance
in a product for the purpose of
increasing the apparent value of the
product or reducing the cost of its
production, i.e., for economic gain.
EMA includes dilution of products with
increased quantities of an alreadypresent substance (e.g., increasing
inactive ingredients of a drug with a
resulting reduction in strength of the
finished product, or watering down of
juice) to the extent that such dilution
poses a known or possible health risk to
consumers, as well as the addition or
substitution of substances in order to
mask dilution.
Several recent incidents involving
FDA-regulated products are suspected
to be examples of EMA. These incidents
illustrate the potential for serious public
health harm from such adulterated
products.
In March 2007, FDA received reports
of kidney failure among cats and dogs
and a report that cats died during taste
tests of certain brands of pet food. In the
subsequent investigation, melamine and
melamine-related compounds were
found in products labeled as wheat
gluten and rice protein concentrate that
had been imported from China. Wheat
gluten and rice protein concentrate are
common ingredients in numerous pet
food products sold in the United States.
Melamine and its related compounds
are not approved for use as an
ingredient in animal or human food,
and FDA believes it was these
contaminants that made the cats and
dogs sick. At certain exposure levels,
the interaction of melamine and
melamine-related compounds appears
to cause the formation of crystals in the
kidneys, resulting in kidney damage.
Based on the information that FDA has,
it appears that these contaminants were
added to the products handled by
Chinese suppliers to increase the
apparent protein content in those
products. Consumers and veterinarians
have since reported many more animal
illnesses and deaths potentially
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
associated with pet foods made from
these products. Over 150 brands of pet
food and 1,000 products were
voluntarily recalled by a number of
companies.
In January 2008, FDA received reports
of adverse reactions in pediatric dialysis
patients in the U.S. Initial investigations
by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention indicated that the adverse
events appeared to be associated with
heparin manufactured by Baxter
Healthcare Corp. that was administered
during the dialysis procedures. In
January and February 2008, Baxter
Healthcare Corp. voluntarily recalled all
of its heparin products. FDA’s
investigation ultimately identified
almost 150 U.S. deaths occurring
between January 1, 2007, and May 31,
2008, that appeared to be associated
with the use of these heparin products.
During the investigation, FDA scientists
collaborated with academia and
industry and identified a contaminant
in the heparin active pharmaceutical
ingredient (API) obtained from suppliers
in China. The contaminant was a
heparin-like molecule whose presence
in heparin API was not detected by the
United States Pharmacopoeia (USP)
release tests for heparin. The
contaminant was identified as
oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS).
FDA posted two new analytical tests to
detect the contaminant OSCS on its Web
site in March 2008, and the agency
collaborated with USP to revise the test
methods and modify the monograph for
heparin to test for OSCS. These new
tests were used on heparin API
imported into the United States and
throughout the world. Contaminated
heparin API has been found in 11
countries.
In September 2008, FDA issued a
Health Information Advisory in
response to reports of melamine
contaminated milk-based infant formula
manufactured in China. Melamine was
apparently added to diluted milk in
order to increase measured nitrogen
levels (indicators of protein content)
and thereby inflate the apparent protein
content found in the product. FDA
issued further advisories to address
additional milk-based products. To date,
official reports from the Chinese
Ministry of Health state that nearly
300,000 Chinese infants were sickened
by the contaminated infant formula, and
that six infant deaths were likely due to
the contamination. There have been no
confirmed illnesses or deaths in the
United States attributed to melamine in
products containing milk or milkderived ingredients, although some
contaminated products were found at
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ethnic markets selling imported
products.
Adulteration of glycerin, an
ingredient in cough syrup and other
drugs, with diethylene glycol (DEG) has
resulted in several mass poisonings
around the world in the past two
decades. In 1996, contaminated
acetaminophen syrup was responsible
for the deaths of more than 70 children
in Haiti. In 2006, tainted cough syrup
resulted in dozens of deaths in Panama.
In Nigeria, between 2008 and 2009,
more than 50 children died after
ingesting contaminated teething syrup.
Incidents of DEG contamination in these
two decades have not resulted in any
reported U.S. deaths or illnesses, but in
2007, foreign-made toothpaste
contaminated with DEG was reported in
the United States resulting in recalls
and restriction on imports of suspect
toothpastes. FDA has collaborated with
USP to revise the test methods for
glycerin and other monographs to test
for the presence of DEG.
As the preceding examples illustrate,
despite longstanding FDA requirements
to assure the safety of regulated
products, such as requirements for the
use of ingredients of known identity and
quality in drugs, economically
motivated adulteration remains a public
health threat.
B. FDA Science Board Meeting and EMA
Workgroup
At the October 31, 2008, meeting of
the FDA Science Board, FDA presented
a conceptual model of EMA. The model
describes circumstances and factors that
are likely to lead to EMA, and points to
certain types of information that may be
useful in trying to prevent EMA. In
response to the feedback obtained
during the Science Board Meeting, FDA
formed an internal working group
focused on predicting and addressing
EMA (‘‘EMA Workgroup’’). At the
February 25, 2009, meeting of the
Science Board, FDA announced its
intent to hold a public meeting on EMA.
III. Purpose of Meeting and Questions
for Discussion
The purpose of the public meeting is
to raise awareness about the potential
for EMA and solicit input and
comments on how industry, regulators,
and other parties can better predict,
prevent, and address EMA. FDA’s EMA
Workgroup has developed a set of
questions to focus discussion on the
matter. These questions apply to food
(including dietary supplements and
animal food), drug, device and cosmetic
products and their components/
ingredients. The EMA Workgroup
requests comment and input on these
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
questions, as well as any responses to
the questions themselves based on
information that may already be in the
public domain. The EMA Workgroup
further requests comment on the utility
of the working definition of EMA used
here. A transcript of the public meeting
will be made available.
Please note that FDA does not wish to
publicize sensitive information that
could potentially be used by those who
wish to commit EMA or other
adulteration or that identifies those who
may be committing adulteration FDA
would like to remind the public that if
they have information about these or
any other problems they have
encountered with FDA products, they
may report such information at https://
www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/
problem.html. In addition, if the public
has information pertaining to suspected
criminal activity with regard to FDAregulated products (e.g., information
about individuals who may be
committing EMA or other adulteration),
they may contact FDA’s Office of
Criminal Investigations at https://
www.fda.gov/oci/default.htm in lieu of
responding publicly to this document.
(1) General Questions:
a. What information should U.S.
regulators seek and from what
sources to help predict and prevent
EMA? What further steps can U.S.
regulators take to predict and
prevent EMA?
b. What are members of industry
doing to prevent EMA? What
further steps can industry take to
prevent EMA?
c. What recent examples of known
or suspected EMA domestically and
internationally should U.S.
regulators study and learn from?
d. What information do other
organizations (including, but not
limited to, trade organizations and
security service providers) have that
would be useful in predicting and
preventing EMA? What are
members of other organizations
doing to prevent EMA?
e. What are other government
regulators within and outside of the
United States doing to predict and
address EMA?
f. What indicators (economic-based,
chemistry-based, etc.) might be
used to detect potential EMA?
(2) Questions pertaining to attributes of
products, components/ingredients that
may be at risk for EMA:
a. What are attributes of products or
components/ingredients of products
that may cause them to be more
vulnerable to EMA?
b. What food products are marketed
based on measured content of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
certain constituents, such as
content of certain proteins, certain
fats, or certain sugars?
(3) Questions pertaining to changes in
the marketing environment: What
changes relevant to the risk for EMA
have occurred recently in:
a. The marketing environment of
products or components/
ingredients?
b. The sourcing and/or distribution
of products?
c. The prices, output, imports or
exports of products or components/
ingredients?
d. The supply of components/
ingredients or source materials for
products?
(4) Questions about detection methods:
a. What analytical equipment or
methods currently used by industry
and regulators to establish the
identity or quality of a product or
its conformity to specifications may
be inadequate to detect evidence of
EMA or adulterated products or
ingredients?
b. Are there appropriate analytical
methods/equipment that could be
used instead of, or in addition to,
existing methods or equipment in
particular situations?
c. What rapid methods can be used
to detect adulteration of products or
ingredients?
(5) What systems are currently being
used to track and verify components/
ingredients from their source?
(6) Are there particular types of industry
structures or supply chains that are
especially vulnerable to or secure from
potential EMA?
IV. Transcripts
Please be advised that as soon as a
transcript is available, it will be
accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed
at the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD. A transcript will
also be available in either hardcopy or
on CD-ROM, after submission of a
Freedom of Information request. Written
requests are to be sent to Division of
Freedom of Information (HFI–35), Office
of Management Programs, Food and
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, rm. 6–30, Rockville, MD 20857.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic
comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic
comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15499
individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: April 1, 2009.
Randall W. Lutter,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9–7843 Filed 4–2–09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Diabetes Mellitus Interagency
Coordinating Committee; Notice of
Meeting
The Diabetes Mellitus Interagency
Coordinating Committee (DMICC) will
hold a meeting on May 6, 2009, from
12:30 to 4:30 p.m. at Building 31C,
Conference Room 6C, on the NIH
campus, 9000 Wisconsin Ave.,
Bethesda, MD. The meeting will be open
to the public, with attendance limited to
space available. Non-federal individuals
planning to attend the meeting should
notify the Contact Person listed on this
notice at least 2 days prior to the
meeting. Individuals who plan to attend
and need special assistance, such as
sign language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodations, should
inform the Contact Person listed below
at least 10 days in advance of the
meeting.
The DMICC facilitates cooperation,
communication, and collaboration on
diabetes among government entities.
DMICC meetings, held several times a
year, provide an opportunity for
members to learn about and discuss
current and future diabetes programs in
DMICC member organizations and to
identify opportunities for collaboration.
The May 6, 2009, DMICC meeting will
discuss ‘‘Federally Supported DiabetesRelated National Education Programs.’’
Any member of the public interested
in presenting oral comments to the
Committee should notify the Contact
Person listed on this notice at least 10
days in advance of the meeting.
Interested individuals and
representatives or organizations should
submit a letter of intent, a brief
description of the organization
represented, and a written copy of their
oral presentation in advance of the
meeting. Only one representative of an
organization will be allowed to present
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15497-15499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7843]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0166]
Economically Motivated Adulteration; Public Meeting; Request for
Comment
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public
meeting pertaining to economically motivated adulteration (EMA). The
purpose of the meeting is to stimulate and focus a discussion about
ways in which the food (including dietary supplements and animal food),
drug, medical device, and cosmetic industries, regulatory agencies, and
other parties can better predict and prevent economically motivated
adulteration with a focus on situations that pose the greatest public
health risk. FDA invites interested individuals, organizations, and
other stakeholders, including industry representatives, to present
information pertaining to predicting and preventing EMA of food
(including dietary supplements and animal food), drugs, medical
devices, and cosmetics. The agency also requests interested parties to
submit comments on this issue to the public docket.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on May 1, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m. Submit written or electronic comments by August 1, 2009. See
section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for deadlines
regarding the meeting.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held in the Wiley Auditorium,
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy.,
College Park, MD 20740-3835. Submit written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD, 20852. Submit electronic
comments to the docket at https://www.regulations.gov. See section V of
this document for additional information on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
For registration, requests to make an oral presentation, and
submission of written material for the presentation: Deborah Harris,
EDJ Associates, Inc., 11300 Rockville Pike, suite 1001, Rockville, MD
20852, 240-221-4326, FAX: 301-945-4295, e-mail:
dharris@edjassociates.com.
For general questions about the meeting, to request onsite parking
for the meeting, or for special accommodations due to a disability:
Juanita Yates, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and
Drug Administration (HFS-009), 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park,
MD 20740, 301-436-1731, e-mail: Juanita.Yates@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. How to Participate in the Meeting
Due to limited space and time, we encourage all persons who wish to
attend the meeting, including those requesting an opportunity to make
an oral presentation at the meeting, to register in advance. Attendees
may register in advance for the meeting by April 23, 2009. Requests for
oral presentations should be made by April 16, 2009. Presenters should
submit final presentations by April 23, 2009, in order for us to
accommodate their request. Requests for special accommodations due to
disability should be made by April 23, 2009. Requests for onsite
parking may be made until April 27, 2009.
We encourage attendees to register for this meeting electronically
at https://www.fda.gov/oc/meetings/ema.html. You may also register by
mail, fax, e-mail, or telephone by providing registration information
(including name, title, firm name, address, telephone number, fax
number, and e-mail address) to the contact person (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Attendees will have an opportunity to provide
oral comments. Depending on the number of oral presentations, we
[[Page 15498]]
may need to limit the time of each oral presentation (e.g., 5 minutes
each). Requests to make an oral presentation, submission of written
material for the presentation, requests for special accommodations due
to disability, and requests for onsite parking should be directed to
the contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
II. Background on the Meeting
A. Suspected Economically Motivated Adulteration of FDA-Regulated
Products
For purposes of this public meeting, FDA proposes a working
definition of EMA as the fraudulent, intentional substitution or
addition of a substance in a product for the purpose of increasing the
apparent value of the product or reducing the cost of its production,
i.e., for economic gain. EMA includes dilution of products with
increased quantities of an already-present substance (e.g., increasing
inactive ingredients of a drug with a resulting reduction in strength
of the finished product, or watering down of juice) to the extent that
such dilution poses a known or possible health risk to consumers, as
well as the addition or substitution of substances in order to mask
dilution.
Several recent incidents involving FDA-regulated products are
suspected to be examples of EMA. These incidents illustrate the
potential for serious public health harm from such adulterated
products.
In March 2007, FDA received reports of kidney failure among cats
and dogs and a report that cats died during taste tests of certain
brands of pet food. In the subsequent investigation, melamine and
melamine-related compounds were found in products labeled as wheat
gluten and rice protein concentrate that had been imported from China.
Wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate are common ingredients in
numerous pet food products sold in the United States. Melamine and its
related compounds are not approved for use as an ingredient in animal
or human food, and FDA believes it was these contaminants that made the
cats and dogs sick. At certain exposure levels, the interaction of
melamine and melamine-related compounds appears to cause the formation
of crystals in the kidneys, resulting in kidney damage. Based on the
information that FDA has, it appears that these contaminants were added
to the products handled by Chinese suppliers to increase the apparent
protein content in those products. Consumers and veterinarians have
since reported many more animal illnesses and deaths potentially
associated with pet foods made from these products. Over 150 brands of
pet food and 1,000 products were voluntarily recalled by a number of
companies.
In January 2008, FDA received reports of adverse reactions in
pediatric dialysis patients in the U.S. Initial investigations by the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicated that the adverse
events appeared to be associated with heparin manufactured by Baxter
Healthcare Corp. that was administered during the dialysis procedures.
In January and February 2008, Baxter Healthcare Corp. voluntarily
recalled all of its heparin products. FDA's investigation ultimately
identified almost 150 U.S. deaths occurring between January 1, 2007,
and May 31, 2008, that appeared to be associated with the use of these
heparin products. During the investigation, FDA scientists collaborated
with academia and industry and identified a contaminant in the heparin
active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) obtained from suppliers in
China. The contaminant was a heparin-like molecule whose presence in
heparin API was not detected by the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP)
release tests for heparin. The contaminant was identified as
oversulfated chondroitin sulfate (OSCS). FDA posted two new analytical
tests to detect the contaminant OSCS on its Web site in March 2008, and
the agency collaborated with USP to revise the test methods and modify
the monograph for heparin to test for OSCS. These new tests were used
on heparin API imported into the United States and throughout the
world. Contaminated heparin API has been found in 11 countries.
In September 2008, FDA issued a Health Information Advisory in
response to reports of melamine contaminated milk-based infant formula
manufactured in China. Melamine was apparently added to diluted milk in
order to increase measured nitrogen levels (indicators of protein
content) and thereby inflate the apparent protein content found in the
product. FDA issued further advisories to address additional milk-based
products. To date, official reports from the Chinese Ministry of Health
state that nearly 300,000 Chinese infants were sickened by the
contaminated infant formula, and that six infant deaths were likely due
to the contamination. There have been no confirmed illnesses or deaths
in the United States attributed to melamine in products containing milk
or milk-derived ingredients, although some contaminated products were
found at ethnic markets selling imported products.
Adulteration of glycerin, an ingredient in cough syrup and other
drugs, with diethylene glycol (DEG) has resulted in several mass
poisonings around the world in the past two decades. In 1996,
contaminated acetaminophen syrup was responsible for the deaths of more
than 70 children in Haiti. In 2006, tainted cough syrup resulted in
dozens of deaths in Panama. In Nigeria, between 2008 and 2009, more
than 50 children died after ingesting contaminated teething syrup.
Incidents of DEG contamination in these two decades have not resulted
in any reported U.S. deaths or illnesses, but in 2007, foreign-made
toothpaste contaminated with DEG was reported in the United States
resulting in recalls and restriction on imports of suspect toothpastes.
FDA has collaborated with USP to revise the test methods for glycerin
and other monographs to test for the presence of DEG.
As the preceding examples illustrate, despite longstanding FDA
requirements to assure the safety of regulated products, such as
requirements for the use of ingredients of known identity and quality
in drugs, economically motivated adulteration remains a public health
threat.
B. FDA Science Board Meeting and EMA Workgroup
At the October 31, 2008, meeting of the FDA Science Board, FDA
presented a conceptual model of EMA. The model describes circumstances
and factors that are likely to lead to EMA, and points to certain types
of information that may be useful in trying to prevent EMA. In response
to the feedback obtained during the Science Board Meeting, FDA formed
an internal working group focused on predicting and addressing EMA
(``EMA Workgroup''). At the February 25, 2009, meeting of the Science
Board, FDA announced its intent to hold a public meeting on EMA.
III. Purpose of Meeting and Questions for Discussion
The purpose of the public meeting is to raise awareness about the
potential for EMA and solicit input and comments on how industry,
regulators, and other parties can better predict, prevent, and address
EMA. FDA's EMA Workgroup has developed a set of questions to focus
discussion on the matter. These questions apply to food (including
dietary supplements and animal food), drug, device and cosmetic
products and their components/ingredients. The EMA Workgroup requests
comment and input on these
[[Page 15499]]
questions, as well as any responses to the questions themselves based
on information that may already be in the public domain. The EMA
Workgroup further requests comment on the utility of the working
definition of EMA used here. A transcript of the public meeting will be
made available.
Please note that FDA does not wish to publicize sensitive
information that could potentially be used by those who wish to commit
EMA or other adulteration or that identifies those who may be
committing adulteration FDA would like to remind the public that if
they have information about these or any other problems they have
encountered with FDA products, they may report such information at
https://www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/problem.html. In addition, if
the public has information pertaining to suspected criminal activity
with regard to FDA-regulated products (e.g., information about
individuals who may be committing EMA or other adulteration), they may
contact FDA's Office of Criminal Investigations at https://www.fda.gov/oci/default.htm in lieu of responding publicly to this document.
(1) General Questions:
a. What information should U.S. regulators seek and from what
sources to help predict and prevent EMA? What further steps can U.S.
regulators take to predict and prevent EMA?
b. What are members of industry doing to prevent EMA? What further
steps can industry take to prevent EMA?
c. What recent examples of known or suspected EMA domestically and
internationally should U.S. regulators study and learn from?
d. What information do other organizations (including, but not
limited to, trade organizations and security service providers) have
that would be useful in predicting and preventing EMA? What are members
of other organizations doing to prevent EMA?
e. What are other government regulators within and outside of the
United States doing to predict and address EMA?
f. What indicators (economic-based, chemistry-based, etc.) might
be used to detect potential EMA?
(2) Questions pertaining to attributes of products, components/
ingredients that may be at risk for EMA:
a. What are attributes of products or components/ingredients of
products that may cause them to be more vulnerable to EMA?
b. What food products are marketed based on measured content of
certain constituents, such as content of certain proteins, certain
fats, or certain sugars?
(3) Questions pertaining to changes in the marketing environment: What
changes relevant to the risk for EMA have occurred recently in:
a. The marketing environment of products or components/
ingredients?
b. The sourcing and/or distribution of products?
c. The prices, output, imports or exports of products or
components/ingredients?
d. The supply of components/ingredients or source materials for
products?
(4) Questions about detection methods:
a. What analytical equipment or methods currently used by industry
and regulators to establish the identity or quality of a product or its
conformity to specifications may be inadequate to detect evidence of
EMA or adulterated products or ingredients?
b. Are there appropriate analytical methods/equipment that could
be used instead of, or in addition to, existing methods or equipment in
particular situations?
c. What rapid methods can be used to detect adulteration of
products or ingredients?
(5) What systems are currently being used to track and verify
components/ingredients from their source?
(6) Are there particular types of industry structures or supply chains
that are especially vulnerable to or secure from potential EMA?
IV. Transcripts
Please be advised that as soon as a transcript is available, it
will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at
the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD. A
transcript will also be available in either hardcopy or on CD-ROM,
after submission of a Freedom of Information request. Written requests
are to be sent to Division of Freedom of Information (HFI-35), Office
of Management Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, rm. 6-30, Rockville, MD 20857.
V. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
Dated: April 1, 2009.
Randall W. Lutter,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-7843 Filed 4-2-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S