Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter, 15510-15513 [E9-7609]
Download as PDF
15510
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
ACTION:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
Notice of Cancellation of Customs
Broker Licenses
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
General notice.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs
Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the
following Customs broker licenses and
all associated permits are cancelled
without prejudice.
Name
License No.
Romeo Chapa .................................................................................................................................................
Elite Brokerage Services, Inc ..........................................................................................................................
Philip C. Ziskrout, Inc ......................................................................................................................................
Murphy International Corporation ....................................................................................................................
Dated: March 25, 2009.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. E9–7614 Filed 4–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Ground
Fault Circuit Interrupter
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
SUMMARY: This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of a ground fault circuit
interrupter (‘‘GFCI’’). Based upon the
facts presented, CBP has concluded in
the final determination that Mexico is
the country of origin of the GFCI for
purposes of U.S. government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on March 26, 2009. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within May 6,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elif
Eroglu, Valuation and Special Programs
Branch: (202) 325–0277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on March 26, 2009,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of the GFCI which may be offered
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
to the U.S. Government under an
undesignated government procurement
contract. This final determination, in
HQ H047362, was issued at the request
of Pass & Seymour, Inc. under
procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177,
subpart B, which implements Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the
final determination, CBP has concluded
that, based upon the facts presented, the
GFCI, assembled in Mexico from parts
made in China, is substantially
transformed in Mexico, such that
Mexico is the country of origin of the
finished article for purposes of U.S.
government procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
Dated: March 26, 2009.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
Attachment
March 26, 2009.
MAR–2–05 OT:RR:CTF:VS H047362 EE
CATEGORY: Marking
Daniel B. Berman, Esq., Hancock &
Estabrook, LLP, 1500 AXA Tower I, 100
Madison Street, Syracuse, NY 13202.
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III,
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C.
2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP
Regulations; Country of Origin Marking;
Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter.
Dear Mr. Berman: This is in response to
your correspondence of November 20, 2008,
requesting a final determination on behalf of
Pass & Seymour, Inc. (‘‘P&S’’), pursuant to
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
09928
09912
13201
20547
Issuing port
Houston.
Houston.
Los Angeles.
Los Angeles.
subpart B of part 177, Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) Regulations (19 CFR
177.21 et seq.). Under the pertinent
regulations, which implement Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country
of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or
would be a product of a designated country
or instrumentality for the purpose of granting
waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of a ground fault circuit
interrupter (‘‘GFCI’’). We note that P&S is a
party-at-interest within the meaning of 19
CFR § 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
You also request a country of origin
marking determination.
FACTS: You describe the pertinent facts as
follows. The business of P&S includes the
design, manufacture, and distribution of
GFCIs in the U.S. for residential and
commercial use in electrical circuits of less
than 1,000 volts. The GFCIs are electrical
components, designed for permanent
installation in electrical circuits, which are
able to detect small imbalances in the
circuit’s current caused by leakages of
current to ground. When leakage is detected,
the GFCI opens the electrical circuit,
stopping the flow of current. Legrand, the
parent company of P&S, produces the
components of the GFCI in China through
another subsidiary, Rocom Electric Co. Ltd.
(‘‘Rocom’’). Rocom plans to ship the
components to a facility in Mexico where
thirty-two of the components will be
assembled in a forty-two step process into a
Printed Circuit Board subassembly (‘‘PCB’’),
which will in turn be assembled, with
twenty-nine other components, into the GFCI
in a forty-three step process. The GFCI will
be tested and packaged at the same facility.
Upon completion of assembly, testing, and
packaging, the GFCI will be imported into the
U.S. by P&S for sale and distribution.
The components from China include the
following: cover, reset button, test button,
light pipe, strap assembly, assembly
terminals, contact, separator, springs, latch
block top, spark gap blades, assembly screw
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
terminals, armature, spring assembly, term
assemblies, resistors, capacitors, diodes,
LEDs, latches, solenoids, wires, back body,
miswire cap, screws, and labels. A complete
list of the sixty-one components was
included with your submission. You have
provided six exhibits, which include
schematics, photographs, and the step-bystep assembly process of the GFCI in Mexico.
Exhibit G shows phase one (the assembly of
the PCB), which is comprised of forty-two
discreet steps and thirty-two parts, takes
approximately twelve minutes. Exhibit D
shows phase two (the assembly of the GFCI
from components including the PCB), which
is comprised of forty-three discrete steps and
thirty parts, takes approximately ten minutes.
You claim that each step, unless otherwise
noted, is completed by skilled workers who
undergo an extensive training process.
PCB assembly process:
1. Apply adhesive to PCB (in three-up
array).
2–25. Place surface-mount electronic
components onto foil-side of PCB: fourteen
resistors; nine capacitors; integrated circuit.
26. Cure adhesive in oven.
27–32. Place leaded electronic components
onto top-side of PCB: two jumper wires;
Medal Oxide Varistor; Diode; Silicon
Controlled Rectifier; Light Emitting Diode.
33–34. Assemble bobbin solenoid
subassembly—bobbin, latch block, latch,
spring and auxiliary contact (two pcs). Fit
subassembly into corresponding holes in
PCB.
35. Place spring over solenoid plunger and
insert into hole in solenoid.
36. Fit toroid subassembly into
corresponding holes in PCB.
37. Place leaded resistor through hole in
toroid subassembly into PCB.
38. Send PCB subassembly (still in array)
through wave solder machine.
39. Visually inspect solder side of PCB
after wave solder, touch-up as required.
40. Hand solder in miswire link between
resistors R9 and R15.
41. Send assembly through in-circuit test
for component verification and measurement.
42. Place array in press and singulate
individual PCB subassemblies from array.
GFCI assembly process:
1. Place back body into date code fixture/
stamping-press and press button to apply
date code on side of back body.
2. Remove back body from date code
fixture. Place hot terminal-screw/pressureplate assembly into back body cradle on line
end.
3. Place neutral terminal-screw/pressureplate assembly into back body cradle on line
end.
4. Place PCB subassembly into back body,
capturing terminal-screw/pressure-plate
subassemblies under line terminals.
5. Place hot terminal-screw/pressure-plate
subassembly into back body cradle on load
end.
6. Place neutral terminal-screw/pressureplate subassembly into back body cradle on
load end.
7. Place hot load terminal subassembly into
back body, over load screw/pressure plate
subassembly.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
8. Place neutral load terminal subassembly
into back body, over load screw/pressure
plate assembly.
9. Place two break springs into latch block.
10. Place latch block with springs onto line
contacts, aligning leg of latch block over
auxiliary switch on PCB.
11. Drop separator over device, aligning
test resistor lead through hole in separator.
Snap separator onto back body.
12. Place strap subassembly into center
channel of separator.
13. Place hot-side load contact into slot in
separator.
14. Bend test resistor lead over with finger
to test blade slot.
15. Press test blade leg into slot in
separator, capturing test resistor lead in slot
on bottom leg of test blade.
16. Place neutral-side load contact into slot
in separator.
17. Place light pipe into hole/slot in
separator.
18. Place reset button/pin/make spring
subassembly into hole through strap/
separator.
19. Set two shutter subassemblies into
pockets in device cover/test button
subassembly.
20. Place cover/test-button subassembly on
top of device, fitting over reset button
subassembly and light pipe.
21. Turn device over. Place four assembly
screws in holes at corners of back body.
22. Run assembly screws in and torque
down with driver.
23. Place device in automated final tester
fixture.
24. Short circuit test.
25. False trip test.
26. Trip level test in forward polarity, full
load.
27. Trip level test in reverse polarity, full
load.
28. Grounded-neutral test.
29. Test-button test.
30. Dielectric test.
31. Response time test with 500 ohm fault
resistor.
32. If device passes all tests, hand solder
link across solder bridge on bottom of PCB
to activate miswire circuit.
33. Depress reset button on device and
place device in automatic miswire-function
tester. Push button to initiate test to verify
device trips.
34. If device passes, snap plastic cap into
back body, covering miswire solder bridge.
35. Remove miswire label from roll and
apply across back body and load terminal
screws.
36. Remove UL label from roll and apply
to neutral side of device, overlapping back
body, separator and cover.
37. Place cardboard protector over face of
device.
38. Place wallplate subassembly with
captive screws over cardboard protector and
face of device.
39. Take stack of three pre-folded
instruction sheets and fuse box label and
place under device.
40. Remove product box label from roll and
place on flap of individual box.
41. Assemble individual box, closing flap
on one end.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15511
42. Slide device, protector, wallplate and
instruction sheets into individual box and
close flap.
43. Place individual box into carton for
shipping.
ISSUES
1. What is the country of origin of the GFCI
for the purpose of U.S. government
procurement?
2. What is the country of origin of the GFCI
for the purpose of marking?
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Government Procurement
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR
177.21 et seq., which implements Title III of
the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues
country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or
would be a product of a designated country
or instrumentality for the purposes of
granting waivers of certain ‘‘Buy American’’
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S.
Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19
U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly the
growth, product, or manufacture of that
country or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case
of an article which consists in whole or in
part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially
transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was so transformed.
See also, 19 CFR § 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final
determinations for purposes of U.S.
government procurement, CBP applies the
provisions of subpart B of part 177 consistent
with the Federal Acquisition Regulations.
See 19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP
recognizes that the Federal Acquisition
Regulations restrict the U.S. Government’s
purchase of products to U.S.-made or
designated country end products for
acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR
25.403(c)(1). The Federal Acquisition
Regulations define ‘‘U.S.-made end product’’
as:
* * * an article that is mined, produced, or
manufactured in the United States or that is
substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of
commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles
from which it was transformed.
48 CFR 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of
parts or materials constitutes a substantial
transformation, the determinative issue is the
extent of operations performed and whether
the parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149
(Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), aff’d, 741 F.2d 1368
(Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or
meaningful, will generally not result in a
substantial transformation. Factors which
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
15512
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
may be relevant in this evaluation may
include the nature of the operation
(including the number of components
assembled), the number of different
operations involved, and whether a
significant period of time, skill, detail, and
quality control are necessary for the assembly
operation. See C.S.D. 80–111, C.S.D. 85–25,
C.S.D. 89–110, C.S.D. 89–118, C.S.D. 90–51,
and C.S.D. 90–97. If the manufacturing or
combining process is a minor one which
leaves the identity of the article intact, a
substantial transformation has not occurred.
Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3 CIT 220,
542 F. Supp. 1026 (1982), aff’d 702 F. 2d
1022 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
In order to determine whether a substantial
transformation occurs when components of
various origins are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the
circumstances and makes such
determinations on a case-by-case basis. The
country of origin of the item’s components,
extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing
renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations
in such cases. Additionally, factors such as
the resources expended on product design
and development, extent and nature of postassembly inspection and testing procedures,
and the degree of skill required during the
actual manufacturing process may be
relevant when determining whether a
substantial transformation has occurred. No
one factor is determinative.
In a number of rulings (e.g., HQ 735608,
dated April 27, 1995 and HQ 559089 dated
August 24, 1995), CBP has stated: ‘‘in our
experience these inquiries are highly fact and
product specific; generalizations are
troublesome and potentially misleading. The
determination is in this instance ‘a mixed
question of technology and Customs law,
mostly the latter.’ ’’ Texas Instruments, Inc. v.
United States, 681 F.2d 778, 783 (CCPA
1982).
In C.S.D. 85–25, 19 Cust. Bull. 844 (1985),
CBP held that for purposes of the Generalized
System of Preferences, the assembly of a large
number of fabricated components onto a
printed circuit board in a process involving
a considerable amount of time and skill
resulted in a substantial transformation. In
that case, in excess of 50 discrete fabricated
components (such as resistors, capacitors,
diodes, integrated circuits, sockets, and
connectors) were assembled. In HQ 711967,
dated March 17, 1980, CBP held that
television sets which were assembled in
Mexico with printed circuit boards, power
transformers, yokes and tuners from Korea
and picture tubes, cabinets, and additional
wiring from the U.S. were products of
Mexico for country of origin marking
purposes. The U.S. and Korean parts were
substantially transformed by the processing
performed in Mexico and all the components
lost their individual identities to become
integral parts of the new article—a television.
In HQ 561734, dated March 22, 2001, CBP
held that certain multifunctional machines
(consisting of printer, copier, and fax
machines) assembled in Japan were a product
of that country for the purposes of U.S.
government procurement. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
multifunctional machines were assembled
from 227 parts (108 parts obtained from
Japan, 92 from Thailand, 3 from China, and
24 from other countries) and eight
subassemblies, each of which was assembled
in Japan. In finding that the imported parts
were substantially transformed in Japan, CBP
stated that the individual parts and
components lost their separate identities
when they became part of the multifunctional machine. See also HQ 561568,
dated March 22, 2001.
This case involves sixty-one components
manufactured in China which are proposed
to be assembled in Mexico in a two phase
process, largely by skilled workers using
sophisticated equipment. The first phase is
the assembly of the PCB and involves a fortytwo step process which will take
approximately twelve minutes. After a
careful consideration of the pertinent facts
and authorities, we find that the assembly of
the PCB, which consists of inserting all active
and passive components into a bare printed
circuit board and soldering all components
necessary for the completion of the
subassembly, is technically complex.
Further, the PCB has all the major
components necessary for the GFCI to fulfill
its function. These components include the
active and passive components, the solenoid
bobbin assembly with both coils/inductors,
hot and neutral ‘‘Line’’ terminals, test, trip
and reset contacts. Therefore, the PCB
imparts the essential character of the GFCI.
In the second phase, the PCB will be
assembled with twenty-nine other
components, into the GFCI in a forty-three
step process which will take approximately
ten minutes. Under the described two-phase
assembly process, the foreign components
lose their individual identities and become
an integral part of a new article, the GFCI,
possessing a new name, character and use.
Based upon the information before us, we
find that the components that are used to
manufacture the GFCI, including the
technically complex PCB assembled in
Mexico, are substantially transformed as a
result of the assembly operations performed
in Mexico, and that the country of origin of
the GFCI for government procurement
purposes is Mexico.
Country of Origin Marking
Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1304), provides that,
unless excepted, every article of foreign
origin imported into the United States shall
be marked in a conspicuous place as legibly,
indelibly, and permanently as the nature of
the article (or container) will permit, in such
manner as to indicate to the ultimate
purchaser in the U.S. the English name of the
country of origin of the article.
Part 134, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 134),
implements the country of origin marking
requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C.
1304. Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19
CFR 134.1(b)), defines the country of origin
of an article as the country of manufacture,
production, or growth of any article of
foreign origin entering the United States.
Further work or material added to an article
in another country must effect a substantial
transformation in order to render such other
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
country the country of origin for country of
origin marking purposes; however, for a good
of a NAFTA country, the NAFTA Marking
Rules will determine the country of origin.
Section 134.1(j), CBP Regulations provides
that the ‘‘NAFTA Marking Rules’’ are the
rules promulgated for purposes of
determining whether a good is a good of a
NAFTA country. Section 134.1(g), CBP
Regulations defines a ‘‘good of a NAFTA
country’’ as an article for which the country
of origin is Canada, Mexico or the United
States as determined under the NAFTA
Marking Rules.
Part 102, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 102),
sets forth the ‘‘NAFTA Marking Rules’’ for
purposes of determining whether a good is a
good of a NAFTA country. Section 102.11,
CBP Regulations (19 CFR § 102.11) sets forth
the required hierarchy for determining
country of origin for marking purposes.
Section 102.11(a), CBP Regulations provides
that the country of origin of a good is the
country in which:
(1) The good is wholly obtained or
produced;
(2) The good is produced exclusively from
domestic materials; or
(3) Each foreign material incorporated in
that good undergoes an applicable change in
tariff classification set out in section 102.20
and satisfies any other applicable
requirements of that section, and all other
requirements of these rules are satisfied.
‘‘Foreign Material’’ is defined in section
102.1(e), CBP Regulations as ‘‘a material
whose country of origin as determined under
these rules is not the same country as the
country in which the good is produced.’’
Section 102.11(a)(1) and (2) do not apply
to the facts presented in this case because the
GFCI, assembled in Mexico from Chinese
components, is neither wholly obtained or
produced, nor produced exclusively from
domestic (i.e., Mexican) materials. Since an
analysis of sections 102.11(a)(1) and
102.11(a)(2) will not yield a country of origin
determination, we look to section
102.11(a)(3) to determine whether the foreign
materials incorporated in the GFCI undergo
an applicable change in tariff classification
(or other applicable requirement) under
section 102.20. The GFCI is classified in
subheading 8536.30.80, Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).
The applicable tariff shift rule found in
section 102.20(o) provides as follows:
8536.10–8536.90 A change to subheading
8536.10 through 8536.90 from any other
subheading, including another subheading
within that group.
In this case, the foreign materials
incorporated in the GFCI are classified in
subheadings other than subheading 8536.30,
HTSUS. Since the components are classified
in a different subheading than the GFCI, the
requisite tariff shift rule is met. Therefore,
pursuant to 19 CFR 102.11(a)(3), the country
of origin of the GFCI is Mexico.
With regard to the marking requirements,
section 134.43(e), CBP Regulations (19 CFR
134.43(e)), provides, in pertinent part that:
Where an article is produced as a result of
an assembly operation and the country of
origin of such article is determined under
this chapter to be the country in which the
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 64 / Monday, April 6, 2009 / Notices
article was finally assembled, such article
may be marked, as appropriate, in a manner
such as the following:
(1) Assembled in (country of final
assembly);
(2) Assembled in (country of final
assembly) from components of (name of
country or countries of origin of all
components); or
(3) Made in, or product of, (country of final
assembly).
The GFCI was the result of an assembly
operation and was finally assembled in
Mexico within the meaning of 19 CFR
134.43(e). Therefore, we find that the GFCI
may be marked ‘‘Made in Mexico,’’
‘‘Assembled in Mexico,’’ or ‘‘Product of
Mexico.’’
HOLDINGS
The components that are used to
manufacture the GFCI are substantially
transformed as a result of the assembly
operations performed in Mexico. Therefore,
the country of origin of the GFCI for
government procurement purposes is
Mexico.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1304, the country of
origin of the GFCI for country of origin
marking purposes is Mexico.
The GFCI may be marked ‘‘Made in
Mexico,’’ ‘‘Assembled in Mexico,’’ or
‘‘Product of Mexico.’’
Notice of this final determination will be
given in the Federal Register, as required by
19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final
determination may request, pursuant to 19
CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any party-atinterest may, within 30 days after publication
of the Federal Register notice referenced
above, seek judicial review of this final
determination before the Court of
International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. E9–7609 Filed 4–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–06–P
1604.14.22, HTSUS, is based on the
apparent United States consumption of
tuna in airtight containers during the
preceding Calendar Year. This
document sets forth the tariff-rate quota
for Calendar Year 2009.
EFFECTIVE DATES: The 2009 tariff-rate
quota is applicable to tuna entered or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption during the period January
1, through December 31, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Headquarters Quota Branch, Textile/
Apparel Policy and Programs Division,
Trade Policy and Programs, Office of
International Trade, U.S. Customs and
Border Protection, Washington, DC
20229, (202) 863–6560.
Background
It has been determined that
18,457,467 kilograms of tuna in air-tight
containers may be entered and
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption during the Calendar Year
2009, at the rate of 6 percent ad valorem
under subheading 1604.14.22, HTSUS.
Any such tuna which is entered or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption during the current
calendar year in excess of this quota
will be dutiable at the rate of 12.5
percent ad valorem under subheading
1604.14.30 HTSUS.
Dated: April 1, 2009.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. E9–7612 Filed 4–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5297–N–01]
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Comment Request; Opinion
by Counsel to the Mortgagor (FHA)
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
AGENCY:
Office of the General Counsel,
Tuna—Tariff-Rate Quota; The TariffRate Quota for Calendar Year 2009
Tuna Classifiable Under Subheading
1604.14.22, Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
HUD.
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection requirement described below
will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The Department is
soliciting public comments on the
subject proposal.
DATES: Comments Due Date: June 5,
2009.
ACTION:
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Announcement of the quota
quantity of tuna in airtight containers
for Calendar Year 2009.
Each year the tariff-rate quota
for tuna described in subheading
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
19:48 Apr 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
Notice.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15513
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Lillian Deitzer, Departmental Reports
Management Officer, QDAM,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410; e-mail
Lillian_L._Deitzer@HUD.gov or
telephone (202) 402–8048.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Millicent Potts, Assistant General
Counsel, Multifamily Mortgage
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street, SW.,
Room 9230, Washington, DC 20410,
telephone (202) 708–4090 (this is not a
toll free number). Copies of the form
documents to be submitted to OMB for
review can be obtained from Ms. Potts
or from HUD’s Web site: https://
www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/
forms/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department is submitting the proposed
information collection to OMB for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended).
This Notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information to: (1) Evaluate
whether the proposed collection is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond; including
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
This Notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposal: Opinion by Counsel
to the Mortgagor (FHA).
OMB Control Number, if applicable:
2510–0010.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
opinion is required to provide comfort
to HUD and the mortgagee in
multifamily rental and health care
facility mortgage insurance transactions.
Agency form numbers, if applicable:
HUD–91725, 91725–instr, 91725–CERT.
Estimation of the total numbers of
hours needed to prepare the information
collection including number of
respondents, frequency of response, and
hours of response: As closings occur in
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 64 (Monday, April 6, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15510-15513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7609]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Ground Fault
Circuit Interrupter
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of a ground fault circuit interrupter (``GFCI'').
Based upon the facts presented, CBP has concluded in the final
determination that Mexico is the country of origin of the GFCI for
purposes of U.S. government procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on March 26, 2009. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within May 6, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elif Eroglu, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch: (202) 325-0277.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on March 26,
2009, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of the GFCI which may be offered to the U.S.
Government under an undesignated government procurement contract. This
final determination, in HQ H047362, was issued at the request of Pass &
Seymour, Inc. under procedures set forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the final determination, CBP has
concluded that, based upon the facts presented, the GFCI, assembled in
Mexico from parts made in China, is substantially transformed in
Mexico, such that Mexico is the country of origin of the finished
article for purposes of U.S. government procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: March 26, 2009.
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
Attachment
March 26, 2009.
MAR-2-05 OT:RR:CTF:VS H047362 EE
CATEGORY: Marking
Daniel B. Berman, Esq., Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, 1500 AXA Tower I,
100 Madison Street, Syracuse, NY 13202.
RE: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979 (19 U.S.C. 2511); Subpart B, Part 177, CBP Regulations; Country
of Origin Marking; Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter.
Dear Mr. Berman: This is in response to your correspondence of
November 20, 2008, requesting a final determination on behalf of
Pass & Seymour, Inc. (``P&S''), pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') Regulations (19 CFR 177.21
et seq.). Under the pertinent regulations, which implement Title III
of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et
seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final
determinations as to whether an article is or would be a product of
a designated country or instrumentality for the purpose of granting
waivers of certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or
practice for products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of a
ground fault circuit interrupter (``GFCI''). We note that P&S is a
party-at-interest within the meaning of 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(d)(1)
and is entitled to request this final determination.
You also request a country of origin marking determination.
FACTS: You describe the pertinent facts as follows. The business
of P&S includes the design, manufacture, and distribution of GFCIs
in the U.S. for residential and commercial use in electrical
circuits of less than 1,000 volts. The GFCIs are electrical
components, designed for permanent installation in electrical
circuits, which are able to detect small imbalances in the circuit's
current caused by leakages of current to ground. When leakage is
detected, the GFCI opens the electrical circuit, stopping the flow
of current. Legrand, the parent company of P&S, produces the
components of the GFCI in China through another subsidiary, Rocom
Electric Co. Ltd. (``Rocom''). Rocom plans to ship the components to
a facility in Mexico where thirty-two of the components will be
assembled in a forty-two step process into a Printed Circuit Board
subassembly (``PCB''), which will in turn be assembled, with twenty-
nine other components, into the GFCI in a forty-three step process.
The GFCI will be tested and packaged at the same facility. Upon
completion of assembly, testing, and packaging, the GFCI will be
imported into the U.S. by P&S for sale and distribution.
The components from China include the following: cover, reset
button, test button, light pipe, strap assembly, assembly terminals,
contact, separator, springs, latch block top, spark gap blades,
assembly screw
[[Page 15511]]
terminals, armature, spring assembly, term assemblies, resistors,
capacitors, diodes, LEDs, latches, solenoids, wires, back body,
miswire cap, screws, and labels. A complete list of the sixty-one
components was included with your submission. You have provided six
exhibits, which include schematics, photographs, and the step-by-
step assembly process of the GFCI in Mexico. Exhibit G shows phase
one (the assembly of the PCB), which is comprised of forty-two
discreet steps and thirty-two parts, takes approximately twelve
minutes. Exhibit D shows phase two (the assembly of the GFCI from
components including the PCB), which is comprised of forty-three
discrete steps and thirty parts, takes approximately ten minutes.
You claim that each step, unless otherwise noted, is completed by
skilled workers who undergo an extensive training process.
PCB assembly process:
1. Apply adhesive to PCB (in three-up array).
2-25. Place surface-mount electronic components onto foil-side
of PCB: fourteen resistors; nine capacitors; integrated circuit.
26. Cure adhesive in oven.
27-32. Place leaded electronic components onto top-side of PCB:
two jumper wires; Medal Oxide Varistor; Diode; Silicon Controlled
Rectifier; Light Emitting Diode.
33-34. Assemble bobbin solenoid subassembly--bobbin, latch
block, latch, spring and auxiliary contact (two pcs). Fit
subassembly into corresponding holes in PCB.
35. Place spring over solenoid plunger and insert into hole in
solenoid.
36. Fit toroid subassembly into corresponding holes in PCB.
37. Place leaded resistor through hole in toroid subassembly
into PCB.
38. Send PCB subassembly (still in array) through wave solder
machine.
39. Visually inspect solder side of PCB after wave solder,
touch-up as required.
40. Hand solder in miswire link between resistors R9 and R15.
41. Send assembly through in-circuit test for component
verification and measurement.
42. Place array in press and singulate individual PCB
subassemblies from array.
GFCI assembly process:
1. Place back body into date code fixture/stamping-press and
press button to apply date code on side of back body.
2. Remove back body from date code fixture. Place hot terminal-
screw/pressure-plate assembly into back body cradle on line end.
3. Place neutral terminal-screw/pressure-plate assembly into
back body cradle on line end.
4. Place PCB subassembly into back body, capturing terminal-
screw/pressure-plate subassemblies under line terminals.
5. Place hot terminal-screw/pressure-plate subassembly into back
body cradle on load end.
6. Place neutral terminal-screw/pressure-plate subassembly into
back body cradle on load end.
7. Place hot load terminal subassembly into back body, over load
screw/pressure plate subassembly.
8. Place neutral load terminal subassembly into back body, over
load screw/pressure plate assembly.
9. Place two break springs into latch block.
10. Place latch block with springs onto line contacts, aligning
leg of latch block over auxiliary switch on PCB.
11. Drop separator over device, aligning test resistor lead
through hole in separator. Snap separator onto back body.
12. Place strap subassembly into center channel of separator.
13. Place hot-side load contact into slot in separator.
14. Bend test resistor lead over with finger to test blade slot.
15. Press test blade leg into slot in separator, capturing test
resistor lead in slot on bottom leg of test blade.
16. Place neutral-side load contact into slot in separator.
17. Place light pipe into hole/slot in separator.
18. Place reset button/pin/make spring subassembly into hole
through strap/separator.
19. Set two shutter subassemblies into pockets in device cover/
test button subassembly.
20. Place cover/test-button subassembly on top of device,
fitting over reset button subassembly and light pipe.
21. Turn device over. Place four assembly screws in holes at
corners of back body.
22. Run assembly screws in and torque down with driver.
23. Place device in automated final tester fixture.
24. Short circuit test.
25. False trip test.
26. Trip level test in forward polarity, full load.
27. Trip level test in reverse polarity, full load.
28. Grounded-neutral test.
29. Test-button test.
30. Dielectric test.
31. Response time test with 500 ohm fault resistor.
32. If device passes all tests, hand solder link across solder
bridge on bottom of PCB to activate miswire circuit.
33. Depress reset button on device and place device in automatic
miswire-function tester. Push button to initiate test to verify
device trips.
34. If device passes, snap plastic cap into back body, covering
miswire solder bridge.
35. Remove miswire label from roll and apply across back body
and load terminal screws.
36. Remove UL label from roll and apply to neutral side of
device, overlapping back body, separator and cover.
37. Place cardboard protector over face of device.
38. Place wallplate subassembly with captive screws over
cardboard protector and face of device.
39. Take stack of three pre-folded instruction sheets and fuse
box label and place under device.
40. Remove product box label from roll and place on flap of
individual box.
41. Assemble individual box, closing flap on one end.
42. Slide device, protector, wallplate and instruction sheets
into individual box and close flap.
43. Place individual box into carton for shipping.
ISSUES
1. What is the country of origin of the GFCI for the purpose of
U.S. government procurement?
2. What is the country of origin of the GFCI for the purpose of
marking?
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Government Procurement
Pursuant to subpart B of part 177, 19 CFR 177.21 et seq., which
implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin advisory
rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is or
would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if
(i) it is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country
or instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists
in whole or in part of materials from another country or
instrumentality, it has been substantially transformed into a new
and different article of commerce with a name, character, or use
distinct from that of the article or articles from which it was so
transformed.
See also, 19 CFR Sec. 177.22(a).
In rendering advisory rulings and final determinations for
purposes of U.S. government procurement, CBP applies the provisions
of subpart B of part 177 consistent with the Federal Acquisition
Regulations. See 19 CFR 177.21. In this regard, CBP recognizes that
the Federal Acquisition Regulations restrict the U.S. Government's
purchase of products to U.S.-made or designated country end products
for acquisitions subject to the TAA. See 48 CFR 25.403(c)(1). The
Federal Acquisition Regulations define ``U.S.-made end product'' as:
* * * an article that is mined, produced, or manufactured in the
United States or that is substantially transformed in the United
States into a new and different article of commerce with a name,
character, or use distinct from that of the article or articles from
which it was transformed.
48 CFR 25.003.
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983),
aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful, will
generally not result in a substantial transformation. Factors which
[[Page 15512]]
may be relevant in this evaluation may include the nature of the
operation (including the number of components assembled), the number
of different operations involved, and whether a significant period
of time, skill, detail, and quality control are necessary for the
assembly operation. See C.S.D. 80-111, C.S.D. 85-25, C.S.D. 89-110,
C.S.D. 89-118, C.S.D. 90-51, and C.S.D. 90-97. If the manufacturing
or combining process is a minor one which leaves the identity of the
article intact, a substantial transformation has not occurred.
Uniroyal, Inc. v. United States, 3 CIT 220, 542 F. Supp. 1026
(1982), aff'd 702 F. 2d 1022 (Fed. Cir. 1983).
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation
occurs when components of various origins are assembled into
completed products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances
and makes such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country
of origin of the item's components, extent of the processing that
occurs within a country, and whether such processing renders a
product with a new name, character, and use are primary
considerations in such cases. Additionally, factors such as the
resources expended on product design and development, extent and
nature of post-assembly inspection and testing procedures, and the
degree of skill required during the actual manufacturing process may
be relevant when determining whether a substantial transformation
has occurred. No one factor is determinative.
In a number of rulings (e.g., HQ 735608, dated April 27, 1995
and HQ 559089 dated August 24, 1995), CBP has stated: ``in our
experience these inquiries are highly fact and product specific;
generalizations are troublesome and potentially misleading. The
determination is in this instance `a mixed question of technology
and Customs law, mostly the latter.' '' Texas Instruments, Inc. v.
United States, 681 F.2d 778, 783 (CCPA 1982).
In C.S.D. 85-25, 19 Cust. Bull. 844 (1985), CBP held that for
purposes of the Generalized System of Preferences, the assembly of a
large number of fabricated components onto a printed circuit board
in a process involving a considerable amount of time and skill
resulted in a substantial transformation. In that case, in excess of
50 discrete fabricated components (such as resistors, capacitors,
diodes, integrated circuits, sockets, and connectors) were
assembled. In HQ 711967, dated March 17, 1980, CBP held that
television sets which were assembled in Mexico with printed circuit
boards, power transformers, yokes and tuners from Korea and picture
tubes, cabinets, and additional wiring from the U.S. were products
of Mexico for country of origin marking purposes. The U.S. and
Korean parts were substantially transformed by the processing
performed in Mexico and all the components lost their individual
identities to become integral parts of the new article--a
television. In HQ 561734, dated March 22, 2001, CBP held that
certain multifunctional machines (consisting of printer, copier, and
fax machines) assembled in Japan were a product of that country for
the purposes of U.S. government procurement. The multifunctional
machines were assembled from 227 parts (108 parts obtained from
Japan, 92 from Thailand, 3 from China, and 24 from other countries)
and eight subassemblies, each of which was assembled in Japan. In
finding that the imported parts were substantially transformed in
Japan, CBP stated that the individual parts and components lost
their separate identities when they became part of the multi-
functional machine. See also HQ 561568, dated March 22, 2001.
This case involves sixty-one components manufactured in China
which are proposed to be assembled in Mexico in a two phase process,
largely by skilled workers using sophisticated equipment. The first
phase is the assembly of the PCB and involves a forty-two step
process which will take approximately twelve minutes. After a
careful consideration of the pertinent facts and authorities, we
find that the assembly of the PCB, which consists of inserting all
active and passive components into a bare printed circuit board and
soldering all components necessary for the completion of the
subassembly, is technically complex. Further, the PCB has all the
major components necessary for the GFCI to fulfill its function.
These components include the active and passive components, the
solenoid bobbin assembly with both coils/inductors, hot and neutral
``Line'' terminals, test, trip and reset contacts. Therefore, the
PCB imparts the essential character of the GFCI.
In the second phase, the PCB will be assembled with twenty-nine
other components, into the GFCI in a forty-three step process which
will take approximately ten minutes. Under the described two-phase
assembly process, the foreign components lose their individual
identities and become an integral part of a new article, the GFCI,
possessing a new name, character and use. Based upon the information
before us, we find that the components that are used to manufacture
the GFCI, including the technically complex PCB assembled in Mexico,
are substantially transformed as a result of the assembly operations
performed in Mexico, and that the country of origin of the GFCI for
government procurement purposes is Mexico.
Country of Origin Marking
Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1304), provides that, unless excepted, every article of foreign
origin imported into the United States shall be marked in a
conspicuous place as legibly, indelibly, and permanently as the
nature of the article (or container) will permit, in such manner as
to indicate to the ultimate purchaser in the U.S. the English name
of the country of origin of the article.
Part 134, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 134), implements the country
of origin marking requirements and exceptions of 19 U.S.C. 1304.
Section 134.1(b), CBP Regulations (19 CFR 134.1(b)), defines the
country of origin of an article as the country of manufacture,
production, or growth of any article of foreign origin entering the
United States. Further work or material added to an article in
another country must effect a substantial transformation in order to
render such other country the country of origin for country of
origin marking purposes; however, for a good of a NAFTA country, the
NAFTA Marking Rules will determine the country of origin.
Section 134.1(j), CBP Regulations provides that the ``NAFTA
Marking Rules'' are the rules promulgated for purposes of
determining whether a good is a good of a NAFTA country. Section
134.1(g), CBP Regulations defines a ``good of a NAFTA country'' as
an article for which the country of origin is Canada, Mexico or the
United States as determined under the NAFTA Marking Rules.
Part 102, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 102), sets forth the ``NAFTA
Marking Rules'' for purposes of determining whether a good is a good
of a NAFTA country. Section 102.11, CBP Regulations (19 CFR Sec.
102.11) sets forth the required hierarchy for determining country of
origin for marking purposes. Section 102.11(a), CBP Regulations
provides that the country of origin of a good is the country in
which:
(1) The good is wholly obtained or produced;
(2) The good is produced exclusively from domestic materials; or
(3) Each foreign material incorporated in that good undergoes an
applicable change in tariff classification set out in section 102.20
and satisfies any other applicable requirements of that section, and
all other requirements of these rules are satisfied.
``Foreign Material'' is defined in section 102.1(e), CBP
Regulations as ``a material whose country of origin as determined
under these rules is not the same country as the country in which
the good is produced.''
Section 102.11(a)(1) and (2) do not apply to the facts presented
in this case because the GFCI, assembled in Mexico from Chinese
components, is neither wholly obtained or produced, nor produced
exclusively from domestic (i.e., Mexican) materials. Since an
analysis of sections 102.11(a)(1) and 102.11(a)(2) will not yield a
country of origin determination, we look to section 102.11(a)(3) to
determine whether the foreign materials incorporated in the GFCI
undergo an applicable change in tariff classification (or other
applicable requirement) under section 102.20. The GFCI is classified
in subheading 8536.30.80, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (``HTSUS''). The applicable tariff shift rule found in
section 102.20(o) provides as follows:
8536.10-8536.90 A change to subheading 8536.10 through 8536.90 from
any other subheading, including another subheading within that
group.
In this case, the foreign materials incorporated in the GFCI are
classified in subheadings other than subheading 8536.30, HTSUS.
Since the components are classified in a different subheading than
the GFCI, the requisite tariff shift rule is met. Therefore,
pursuant to 19 CFR 102.11(a)(3), the country of origin of the GFCI
is Mexico.
With regard to the marking requirements, section 134.43(e), CBP
Regulations (19 CFR 134.43(e)), provides, in pertinent part that:
Where an article is produced as a result of an assembly
operation and the country of origin of such article is determined
under this chapter to be the country in which the
[[Page 15513]]
article was finally assembled, such article may be marked, as
appropriate, in a manner such as the following:
(1) Assembled in (country of final assembly);
(2) Assembled in (country of final assembly) from components of
(name of country or countries of origin of all components); or
(3) Made in, or product of, (country of final assembly).
The GFCI was the result of an assembly operation and was finally
assembled in Mexico within the meaning of 19 CFR 134.43(e).
Therefore, we find that the GFCI may be marked ``Made in Mexico,''
``Assembled in Mexico,'' or ``Product of Mexico.''
HOLDINGS
The components that are used to manufacture the GFCI are
substantially transformed as a result of the assembly operations
performed in Mexico. Therefore, the country of origin of the GFCI
for government procurement purposes is Mexico.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1304, the country of origin of the GFCI
for country of origin marking purposes is Mexico.
The GFCI may be marked ``Made in Mexico,'' ``Assembled in
Mexico,'' or ``Product of Mexico.''
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR 177.29. Any party-at-interest other
than the party which requested this final determination may request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 177.31, that CBP reexamine the matter anew and
issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR 177.30, any
party-at-interest may, within 30 days after publication of the
Federal Register notice referenced above, seek judicial review of
this final determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
Sandra L. Bell,
Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. E9-7609 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-06-P