Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Federal Financial Report (FNS-778) and Financial Status Report Addendum (FNS-778A), 15240-15251 [E9-7509]
Download as PDF
15240
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 63
Friday, April 3, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notice of Public Information
Collections Being Reviewed by the
U.S. Agency for International
Development; Comments Requested
SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) is making efforts
to reduce the paperwork burden. USAID
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on the
following proposed and/or continuing
information collections, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act for 1995.
Comments are requested concerning: (a)
Whether the proposed or continuing
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on the respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
June 2, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Johnson, Bureau for
Management, Office of Administrative
Services, Information and Records
Division, U.S. Agency for International
Development, Room 2.07–106, RRB,
Washington, DC 20523, (202) 712–1365
or via e-mail bjohnson@usaid.gov.
ADDRESSES: Send comments via e-mail
at rrussell@usaid.gov or mail comments
to: Ranta Russell, Office of the Assistant
Administrator, Bureau for Africa,
United States Agency for International
Development, Ronald Reagan Building,
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20523, (202) 712–1137.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
OMB No.: OMB 0412–0572. Form No.:
N/A.
Title: Summer Internship Application.
Type of Review: Renewal of
Information Collection.
Purpose: The United States Agency
for International Development, Africa
Bureau, uses the Summer Internship
Application to collect information from
approximately 300 student applicants to
its summer internship programs for
USAID Missions in Africa and in
Washington, DC.
Annual Reporting Burden:
Respondents: 300.
Total annual responses: 300.
Total annual hours requested: 150
hours.
Dated: March 25, 2009.
Sylvia Lankford,
Acting Chief, Information and Records
Division, Office of Administrative Services,
Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. E9–7377 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program: Federal
Financial Report (FNS–778) and
Financial Status Report Addendum
(FNS–778A)
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) is
publishing for public comment, a
summary of a proposed information
collection. The collection establishes a
new financial report that will replace
the SF–269 (Food Stamp) report
currently used by State agencies to
report expenditures in the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program (formerly the Food Stamp
Program).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Jane
Duffield, Chief, State Administration
Branch, Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program, Food and Nutrition
Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Room 818, Alexandria, VA 22302.
Comments may also be submitted via
fax to the attention of Ms. Duffield at
703–605–0795 or via e-mail to
PADMAILBOX@fns.usda.gov.
Comments will also be accepted through
the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to
5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 818,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will become a
matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection
should be directed to Jane Duffield at
(703) 605–4385.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program: Federal Financial
Report Forms.
OMB Number: Not Yet Assigned.
Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: Section 16(a) of the Food
and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the Act) (7
U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) authorizes the
Secretary to pay each State agency an
amount equal to 50 percent of most
allowable administrative costs involved
in each State agency’s operation of the
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
Program (SNAP) (formerly known as the
Food Stamp Program). In fiscal year
2007, FNS paid State agencies $2.8
billion in reimbursement for their SNAP
administrative costs. Under
corresponding SNAP regulations at 7
CFR 277.11(c), State agencies are
required to use the standard Financial
Status Report (Form SF–269) on a
quarterly basis to report program
administrative costs to FNS and to
support the claims made for Federal
funding. Since 1980, the SNAP has used
a program-specific SF–269 variant
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) that captures total
SNAP administrative costs and
subdivides it into 26 functional
categories. In 1988, OMB published a
new version of the SF–269 that captures
only total program costs. The continued
use of the program-specific variant since
then thus represents an exception to the
general rule approved by OMB.
The requirement to use the SF–269 for
financial reporting originated in OMB
Circular A–102 (Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and
Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments). However, on
December 7, 2007, OMB published a
Federal Register Notice announcing the
promulgation of a new Federal
Financial Report (FFR) and directing
Federal grant-making agencies to begin
requiring their grantees to use it not
later than September 30, 2008 (72 FR
69248). Subsequently, on August 13,
2008, OMB published a Notice which
requires Federal agencies to transition to
the new form no later than October 1,
2009. The new FFR would replace the
SF–269, other standard forms, and
agency-specific and program-specific
financial reports.
While OMB adopted the new FFR in
order to standardize and streamline the
financial reporting on Federal grants
and agreements, the new form cannot
meet the needs of a program as complex
as SNAP. This is because:
1. SNAP consists of numerous
functions and components for which
financial data is needed in order for
FNS to maintain a high level of program
integrity and accountability. All such
functions are required by SNAP
regulations. FNS uses the reported data
to monitor the actual cost of each
function against budgeted amounts
approved for each State agency. Many of
these functions also have a component
in the State Plan. Where the SF–269
currently used for SNAP financial
reporting captures financial data on 26
FSP functions, the new FFR captures
only total program costs. Examples of
needs that cannot be met with capturing
only total program costs include:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
a. Certification. A disproportionate
share of total SNAP administrative
funding supports the cost of certifying
households eligible for SNAP benefits.
Being the largest category in SNAP,
changes in certification activity and
caseload can easily impact both
certification and total costs, both in the
aggregate and in the cost per case. This
function is also affected by a funding
reduction under section 16(k) of the Act
for common costs allocable to the SNAP
but built into States’ block grants under
the Temporary Assistance to Needy
Families (TANF) Program. FNS
monitors to ensure that the offset
occurred in full. Changes in certification
costs and monitoring the offset would
be lost in the total costs data captured
by the new FFR.
b. Nutrition Education. This area of
the program has seen a dramatic
increase in terms of activity and costs in
recent years. The goal of SNAP–Ed is to
improve the likelihood that persons
eligible for SNAP will make healthy
food choices within a limited budget
and choose physically active lifestyles
consistent with the current Dietary
Guidelines for Americans and
MyPyramid. State agencies submit a
SNAP–Ed plan to FNS for approval each
year and FNS monitors the costs against
the budget and approved plan activities.
The SF–269 collection of the costs of
this vital and increasing activity is
necessary for program accountability
and management. It would be buried in
the total costs data captured by the new
FFR.
c. Fraud Control. The Food and
Nutrition Act authorizes FNS to pay the
costs of State SNAP investigations and
prosecutions. States agencies are
required to investigate any allegation of
a suspected intentional program
violation by recipients and refer the
positive cases for administrative
hearings or prosecution which can lead
to disqualification of the recipient. The
SF–269 reporting for this functional
category allows FNS to track and
monitor these State costs for Federal
reimbursement.
d. For the sake of brevity, we will not
go into every functional component.
However, we should note that many of
the cost components are tied to
individual State Plans. They are also
tied to the FNS–366A, Budget
Projection, which uses the same cost
categories as the SF–269.
2. Costs incurred by State agencies to
conduct some SNAP functions are
reimbursed at rates other than the
standard 50 percent rate. For example
FNS reimburses 100 percent of the costs
of administering the program’s
Employment and Training (E&T)
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15241
component, up to a stated ceiling. E&T
administrative costs beyond that ceiling
are reimbursed at 50 percent, and some
E&T cost items are ineligible for 100
percent reimbursement altogether. To
monitor State agencies’ compliance with
these requirements, FNS must collect
data on State agencies’ costs of both 100
percent and 50 percent E&T activity.
However, these distinctions would be
lost in the total cost data captured by
the new FFR.
3. Since the costs of most SNAP
functions are reimbursed at the 50
percent rate, FNS must capture data on
costs supported by resources from
within each State. That is, FNS must
ensure that each State agency has met
its matching requirement.
The options available to FNS are
limited. They include:
Option 1: Instructing State agencies to
shift to the new FFR.
Adopting this option would require a
sweeping re-tooling of FNS and State
agency information technology (IT)
systems to accommodate the new
format. FNS recognizes that the retooling is inevitable because Federal
awarding agencies and their grantees
will begin using the new FFR for
financial reporting on most Federal
programs. As already noted, however,
the new FFR may be satisfactory for
discretionary project and research grants
where only total program costs are
meaningful, but it cannot meet the
needs of SNAP. The only way FNS
could obtain the data needed for SNAP
monitoring and oversight would be to
require each State agency to submit one
FFR covering SNAP’s total
administrative costs and another FFR on
each component/function (26 in all).
Such a procedure would be expensive to
implement and burdensome for State
agencies to comply with. The data
gathered, thereby, would also be
misleading; each SNAP function would
be reported as if it were a discrete
categorical program. A State agency
would end up submitting 26 FFRs under
the same grant agreement.
Option 2: Capturing total SNAP
administrative costs on the new FFR
and devising an addendum to capture
the subset applicable to each function/
component.
This option would enable FNS to
acquire the data needed for SNAP
monitoring and oversight without
requiring State agencies to submit a
separate FFR on each function. While it
would be less burdensome in that
regard, this option would, nonetheless,
suffer from other drawbacks of Option 1.
Specifically, it would also require the
massive IT re-tooling. In addition, it
would entail extensive developmental
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
15242
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
work to create an addendum, obtain
authorization to use it, publish it, train
State officials on its use, and construct
the electronic programming to capture,
analyze, and store the data. Since the
data themselves would be substantially
the same as those currently collected,
FNS believes that re-arranging the data
solely for the sake of change would not
add value.
Option 3: Retaining the existing
reporting requirement.
This option would entail retaining the
content of the SF–269 currently used for
SNAP financial reporting, but would
require FNS to recast that document as
an FNS form rather than a governmentwide standard form. It would have the
advantages of the other options without
their drawbacks. Specifically, it would
require little change to FNS and State IT
systems and no change in the data
themselves. It would minimize
disruption to State agencies, since they
could continue using the SNAP
financial reporting format to which they
are accustomed. For these reasons, FNS
has decided to adopt Option 3.
Accordingly, FNS is proposing to
establish a new program-specific
financial reporting form that would
continue to collect the same data in the
same sequence as the SF–269 currently
used in SNAP. FNS use of the SF–269
(FS) for SNAP is currently approved
under OMB Control No. 0348–0039, but
that information collection
authorization is expected to be
eliminated government-wide. Therefore,
FNS is proposing to assign the current
SF–269 (FS) report for SNAP a new FNS
form number and to put the new
program-specific form into a new
information collection package. The
new form would look nearly identical to
the current SF–269 (FS) except for the
new FNS form number and OMB
control number. These Federal changes
for SNAP would not affect State
agencies data collection and reporting,
or FNS’ automated system’s budget and
cost analysis. States would report on the
new form which would essentially
retain the current line items, cost
categories, and data sequence but will
have a new form number. We should
note that four categories have been
removed from the form because they are
obsolete (coupon issuance, 75% fraud,
75% ADP development, and 63% ADP
development). FNS proposes to seek
OMB approval of the new financial
Affected public
State Agencies ....................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
reporting form and new information
collection package as an exception to
the FFR.
The Financial Status Report
Addendum (SF–269A (FS)) is used by
State agencies for quarterly reporting of
program cash-out benefits where FNS
has approved the issuance of checks or
electronic cash payments in lieu of
electronic benefit transfer (EBT)
benefits. This program benefit report
also is a program-specific form
approved by OMB. Final reports are due
December 30 for the preceding Federal
fiscal year. As with the expenditure
report for administrative costs, FNS is
proposing to give the program benefit
expenditure report a new FNS form
number while keeping the current line
items and one program benefit cost
category on that report. We believe the
consistency between the line items in
the two financial reports (for
administrative costs and for program
benefits) would avoid confusion and
would continue to promote
standardization between the two forms
within the State for SNAP. The new
form would look nearly identical to the
current program specific SF–269A (FS)
used by SNAP, except for the new FNS
form number.
Copies of the proposed new FNS–778,
Financial Status Report, and FNS–778A,
Financial Status Report Addendum, are
displayed at the end of this notice.
Currently, the program regulations at
7 CFR 277.11(c) specifically mention the
use of the ‘‘standard Financial Status
Report (Form SF–269) to report program
costs.’’ Since the new forms will report
the same line items and cost categories
as their predecessors and accomplish
the same purpose as the SF–269 (FS)
and SF–269(A) (FS) for SNAP, FNS is
planning to do a final rule to make a
nomenclature change to the current
regulations to refer to the new forms.
Thus, 7 CFR 277.11(c) will then read
‘‘State agencies shall use the Form FNS–
778 to report program costs.’’ The final
rule will go on to change the other
references to the SF–269 in 277.11(c)
and (d) to conform to the new form
FNS–778. That change will be made via
a final rule, will be on a separate track
and will not delay the changeover to the
new form under the Paperwork
Reduction Act provisions.
FNS plans to extend the use of the
current SF–269 (FS) and SF–269A (FS)
through the end of the Fiscal Year 2009
Number of
respondents
Forms
FNS–778 (Initial Submission).
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Frequency of
response
53
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reporting cycle. That is, the last reports
submitted in the old format will be the
final reports on State agencies’ Fiscal
Year 2009 awards; these reports will be
due December 30, 2009. Use of the new
reports FNS–778 and FNS–778A will
begin with financial reporting for Fiscal
Year 2010. As with the current financial
reports, the new financial status reports
will be due 30 days after the end of the
calendar quarters to which they pertain,
and a final report will be due 90 days
after the end of the fiscal year. Thus, the
first reports using the new FNS–778 and
FNS–778A will be due January 30, 2010,
and the final reports for that fiscal year
will be due December 30, 2010.
State agencies should continue to use
the old form that was in use for a prior
year to amend reports for that prior year.
State agencies may amend a prior year
report in FNS’ Food Programs Reporting
System (FPRS).
Respondents: State agencies that
administer SNAP.
Number of Respondents: 53.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent:
Financial Status Report (FNS–778): 53
State agencies averaging 5 responses per
respondent for the current fiscal year
and an estimated 3 responses per year
for prior year adjustments and
corrections (if needed).
Estimated Total Annual Responses
(FNS–778): 424.
Financial Status Report Addendum
(FNS–778A): 7 State agencies averaging
5 responses per respondent.
Estimated Total Annual Responses
(FNS–778A): 35.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 4,646.
The State agencies submit the
financial status report (FNS–778) for the
current year for administrative costs at
an estimate of 16.8 hours per
respondent, or 4,452 total hours. The 53
State agencies submit revised
expenditure reports on the FNS–778 (for
prior years) for which we estimate 1
hour per respondent for an additional
159 hours annually. The use of the
electronic system will minimize the
burden to State agencies for a revised
report. Seven (7) State agencies will
submit the FNS–778A which is
estimated at 1 hour per respondent or a
total of 35 hours annually.
Total annual
responses
5
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
265
03APN1
Time per
response
(hrs)
16.8
Annual burden
hours
4,452.00
15243
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
Affected public
Number of
respondents
Forms
Frequency of
response
Total annual
responses
Time per
response
(hrs)
Annual burden
hours
FNS–778 (for 2-year revisions).
FNS–778A ..........................
Total Burden Estimates
53
3
159
1
159.00
7
5
35
1
35.00
.............................................
53
........................
459
........................
4,646.00
Dated: March 31, 2009.
E. Enrique Gomez,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
EN03AP09.000
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
15244
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
15245
EN03AP09.001
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
EN03AP09.002
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
15246
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
15247
EN03AP09.003
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
EN03AP09.004
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
15248
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
15249
EN03AP09.005
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
EN03AP09.006
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
15250
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting
to Becki Heath, Designated Federal
Official, USDA, Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane,
Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509–
664–9200.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–C
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Eastern Washington Cascades
Provincial Advisory Committee and the
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee
AGENCY:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Forest Service, USDA.
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington
Cascades Provincial Advisory
Committee and the Yakima Provincial
Advisory Committee will meet on
Thursday, April 23, 2009 at the
Sunnyslope Fire Station, 206 Easy
Street, Wenatchee, WA and on May 27
at the Okanogan-Wenatchee National
Forest Headquarters office, 215 Melody
Lane, Wenatchee, WA. Both meetings
will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until
3 p.m. During the April 23, 2009
meeting, Provincial Advisory
Committee members will receive
information about Lynx habitat studies,
livestock grazing permit system,
motorized law enforcement program,
and volunteer work on the forest.
During the May 27, 2009 meeting
information will be shared about the
Forest’s Travel Management plan and
process. All Eastern Washington
Cascades and Yakima Province
Advisory Committee meetings are open
to the public.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Dated: March 27, 2009.
Rebecca Lockett Heath,
Designated Federal Official, OkanoganWenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–7484 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
members will review Okanogan County
projects proposed for Resource Advisory
Committee consideration under Title II
of the Secure Rural Schools and
Community Self-Determination Act of
2000.
All Wenatchee-Okanogan Resource
Advisory Committee meetings are open
to the public. Interested citizens are
welcome to attend.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting
to Robin DeMario, Public Affairs
Specialist, Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest, 215 Melody Lane,
Wenatchee, Washington 98801 (509)
664–9200.
AGENCY:
Dated: March 27, 2009.
Rebecca Lockett Heath,
Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, Forest
Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9–7485 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
Okanogan and Wenatchee National
Forests Resource Advisory Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Wenatchee-Okanogan
Resource Advisory Committee will meet
on Wednesday, April 29 and
Wednesday, May 13 at the OkanoganWenatchee National Forest
Headquarters Office, 215 Melody Lane,
Wenatchee, WA, and on Wednesday,
May 6 at the Rural County Fire District
#1 Sunnyslope Fire Station, 206 Easy
Street, Wenatchee, WA. These meetings
will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until
3 p.m. On April 29, committee members
will review Yakima County and Kittitas
County projects, on May 6, committee
members will review Chelan County
projects, and on May 13, committee
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR
SEVERELY DISABLED
Procurement List; Additions and
Deletions
AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From
People Who Are Blind or Severely
Disabled.
ACTION: Additions to and deletions from
Procurement List.
SUMMARY: This action adds to the
Procurement List services to be
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
EN03AP09.007
[FR Doc. E9–7509 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
15251
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 63 (Friday, April 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15240-15251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7509]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Federal
Financial Report (FNS-778) and Financial Status Report Addendum (FNS-
778A)
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) is publishing for public comment, a
summary of a proposed information collection. The collection
establishes a new financial report that will replace the SF-269 (Food
Stamp) report currently used by State agencies to report expenditures
in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly the Food
Stamp Program).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Jane Duffield, Chief, State Administration
Branch, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Food and Nutrition
Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 818, Alexandria, VA 22302.
Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of Ms. Duffield
at 703-605-0795 or via e-mail to PADMAILBOX@fns.usda.gov. Comments will
also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday) at 3101 Park Center Drive,
Room 818, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of this information collection should be directed to Jane
Duffield at (703) 605-4385.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Federal Financial
Report Forms.
OMB Number: Not Yet Assigned.
Expiration Date: Not Yet Determined.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: Section 16(a) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the
Act) (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) authorizes the Secretary to pay each State
agency an amount equal to 50 percent of most allowable administrative
costs involved in each State agency's operation of the Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance
[[Page 15241]]
Program (SNAP) (formerly known as the Food Stamp Program). In fiscal
year 2007, FNS paid State agencies $2.8 billion in reimbursement for
their SNAP administrative costs. Under corresponding SNAP regulations
at 7 CFR 277.11(c), State agencies are required to use the standard
Financial Status Report (Form SF-269) on a quarterly basis to report
program administrative costs to FNS and to support the claims made for
Federal funding. Since 1980, the SNAP has used a program-specific SF-
269 variant approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that
captures total SNAP administrative costs and subdivides it into 26
functional categories. In 1988, OMB published a new version of the SF-
269 that captures only total program costs. The continued use of the
program-specific variant since then thus represents an exception to the
general rule approved by OMB.
The requirement to use the SF-269 for financial reporting
originated in OMB Circular A-102 (Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments).
However, on December 7, 2007, OMB published a Federal Register Notice
announcing the promulgation of a new Federal Financial Report (FFR) and
directing Federal grant-making agencies to begin requiring their
grantees to use it not later than September 30, 2008 (72 FR 69248).
Subsequently, on August 13, 2008, OMB published a Notice which requires
Federal agencies to transition to the new form no later than October 1,
2009. The new FFR would replace the SF-269, other standard forms, and
agency-specific and program-specific financial reports.
While OMB adopted the new FFR in order to standardize and
streamline the financial reporting on Federal grants and agreements,
the new form cannot meet the needs of a program as complex as SNAP.
This is because:
1. SNAP consists of numerous functions and components for which
financial data is needed in order for FNS to maintain a high level of
program integrity and accountability. All such functions are required
by SNAP regulations. FNS uses the reported data to monitor the actual
cost of each function against budgeted amounts approved for each State
agency. Many of these functions also have a component in the State
Plan. Where the SF-269 currently used for SNAP financial reporting
captures financial data on 26 FSP functions, the new FFR captures only
total program costs. Examples of needs that cannot be met with
capturing only total program costs include:
a. Certification. A disproportionate share of total SNAP
administrative funding supports the cost of certifying households
eligible for SNAP benefits. Being the largest category in SNAP, changes
in certification activity and caseload can easily impact both
certification and total costs, both in the aggregate and in the cost
per case. This function is also affected by a funding reduction under
section 16(k) of the Act for common costs allocable to the SNAP but
built into States' block grants under the Temporary Assistance to Needy
Families (TANF) Program. FNS monitors to ensure that the offset
occurred in full. Changes in certification costs and monitoring the
offset would be lost in the total costs data captured by the new FFR.
b. Nutrition Education. This area of the program has seen a
dramatic increase in terms of activity and costs in recent years. The
goal of SNAP-Ed is to improve the likelihood that persons eligible for
SNAP will make healthy food choices within a limited budget and choose
physically active lifestyles consistent with the current Dietary
Guidelines for Americans and MyPyramid. State agencies submit a SNAP-Ed
plan to FNS for approval each year and FNS monitors the costs against
the budget and approved plan activities. The SF-269 collection of the
costs of this vital and increasing activity is necessary for program
accountability and management. It would be buried in the total costs
data captured by the new FFR.
c. Fraud Control. The Food and Nutrition Act authorizes FNS to pay
the costs of State SNAP investigations and prosecutions. States
agencies are required to investigate any allegation of a suspected
intentional program violation by recipients and refer the positive
cases for administrative hearings or prosecution which can lead to
disqualification of the recipient. The SF-269 reporting for this
functional category allows FNS to track and monitor these State costs
for Federal reimbursement.
d. For the sake of brevity, we will not go into every functional
component. However, we should note that many of the cost components are
tied to individual State Plans. They are also tied to the FNS-366A,
Budget Projection, which uses the same cost categories as the SF-269.
2. Costs incurred by State agencies to conduct some SNAP functions
are reimbursed at rates other than the standard 50 percent rate. For
example FNS reimburses 100 percent of the costs of administering the
program's Employment and Training (E&T) component, up to a stated
ceiling. E&T administrative costs beyond that ceiling are reimbursed at
50 percent, and some E&T cost items are ineligible for 100 percent
reimbursement altogether. To monitor State agencies' compliance with
these requirements, FNS must collect data on State agencies' costs of
both 100 percent and 50 percent E&T activity. However, these
distinctions would be lost in the total cost data captured by the new
FFR.
3. Since the costs of most SNAP functions are reimbursed at the 50
percent rate, FNS must capture data on costs supported by resources
from within each State. That is, FNS must ensure that each State agency
has met its matching requirement.
The options available to FNS are limited. They include:
Option 1: Instructing State agencies to shift to the new FFR.
Adopting this option would require a sweeping re-tooling of FNS and
State agency information technology (IT) systems to accommodate the new
format. FNS recognizes that the re-tooling is inevitable because
Federal awarding agencies and their grantees will begin using the new
FFR for financial reporting on most Federal programs. As already noted,
however, the new FFR may be satisfactory for discretionary project and
research grants where only total program costs are meaningful, but it
cannot meet the needs of SNAP. The only way FNS could obtain the data
needed for SNAP monitoring and oversight would be to require each State
agency to submit one FFR covering SNAP's total administrative costs and
another FFR on each component/function (26 in all). Such a procedure
would be expensive to implement and burdensome for State agencies to
comply with. The data gathered, thereby, would also be misleading; each
SNAP function would be reported as if it were a discrete categorical
program. A State agency would end up submitting 26 FFRs under the same
grant agreement.
Option 2: Capturing total SNAP administrative costs on the new FFR
and devising an addendum to capture the subset applicable to each
function/component.
This option would enable FNS to acquire the data needed for SNAP
monitoring and oversight without requiring State agencies to submit a
separate FFR on each function. While it would be less burdensome in
that regard, this option would, nonetheless, suffer from other
drawbacks of Option 1. Specifically, it would also require the massive
IT re-tooling. In addition, it would entail extensive developmental
[[Page 15242]]
work to create an addendum, obtain authorization to use it, publish it,
train State officials on its use, and construct the electronic
programming to capture, analyze, and store the data. Since the data
themselves would be substantially the same as those currently
collected, FNS believes that re-arranging the data solely for the sake
of change would not add value.
Option 3: Retaining the existing reporting requirement.
This option would entail retaining the content of the SF-269
currently used for SNAP financial reporting, but would require FNS to
recast that document as an FNS form rather than a government-wide
standard form. It would have the advantages of the other options
without their drawbacks. Specifically, it would require little change
to FNS and State IT systems and no change in the data themselves. It
would minimize disruption to State agencies, since they could continue
using the SNAP financial reporting format to which they are accustomed.
For these reasons, FNS has decided to adopt Option 3.
Accordingly, FNS is proposing to establish a new program-specific
financial reporting form that would continue to collect the same data
in the same sequence as the SF-269 currently used in SNAP. FNS use of
the SF-269 (FS) for SNAP is currently approved under OMB Control No.
0348-0039, but that information collection authorization is expected to
be eliminated government-wide. Therefore, FNS is proposing to assign
the current SF-269 (FS) report for SNAP a new FNS form number and to
put the new program-specific form into a new information collection
package. The new form would look nearly identical to the current SF-269
(FS) except for the new FNS form number and OMB control number. These
Federal changes for SNAP would not affect State agencies data
collection and reporting, or FNS' automated system's budget and cost
analysis. States would report on the new form which would essentially
retain the current line items, cost categories, and data sequence but
will have a new form number. We should note that four categories have
been removed from the form because they are obsolete (coupon issuance,
75% fraud, 75% ADP development, and 63% ADP development). FNS proposes
to seek OMB approval of the new financial reporting form and new
information collection package as an exception to the FFR.
The Financial Status Report Addendum (SF-269A (FS)) is used by
State agencies for quarterly reporting of program cash-out benefits
where FNS has approved the issuance of checks or electronic cash
payments in lieu of electronic benefit transfer (EBT) benefits. This
program benefit report also is a program-specific form approved by OMB.
Final reports are due December 30 for the preceding Federal fiscal
year. As with the expenditure report for administrative costs, FNS is
proposing to give the program benefit expenditure report a new FNS form
number while keeping the current line items and one program benefit
cost category on that report. We believe the consistency between the
line items in the two financial reports (for administrative costs and
for program benefits) would avoid confusion and would continue to
promote standardization between the two forms within the State for
SNAP. The new form would look nearly identical to the current program
specific SF-269A (FS) used by SNAP, except for the new FNS form number.
Copies of the proposed new FNS-778, Financial Status Report, and
FNS-778A, Financial Status Report Addendum, are displayed at the end of
this notice.
Currently, the program regulations at 7 CFR 277.11(c) specifically
mention the use of the ``standard Financial Status Report (Form SF-269)
to report program costs.'' Since the new forms will report the same
line items and cost categories as their predecessors and accomplish the
same purpose as the SF-269 (FS) and SF-269(A) (FS) for SNAP, FNS is
planning to do a final rule to make a nomenclature change to the
current regulations to refer to the new forms. Thus, 7 CFR 277.11(c)
will then read ``State agencies shall use the Form FNS-778 to report
program costs.'' The final rule will go on to change the other
references to the SF-269 in 277.11(c) and (d) to conform to the new
form FNS-778. That change will be made via a final rule, will be on a
separate track and will not delay the changeover to the new form under
the Paperwork Reduction Act provisions.
FNS plans to extend the use of the current SF-269 (FS) and SF-269A
(FS) through the end of the Fiscal Year 2009 reporting cycle. That is,
the last reports submitted in the old format will be the final reports
on State agencies' Fiscal Year 2009 awards; these reports will be due
December 30, 2009. Use of the new reports FNS-778 and FNS-778A will
begin with financial reporting for Fiscal Year 2010. As with the
current financial reports, the new financial status reports will be due
30 days after the end of the calendar quarters to which they pertain,
and a final report will be due 90 days after the end of the fiscal
year. Thus, the first reports using the new FNS-778 and FNS-778A will
be due January 30, 2010, and the final reports for that fiscal year
will be due December 30, 2010.
State agencies should continue to use the old form that was in use
for a prior year to amend reports for that prior year. State agencies
may amend a prior year report in FNS' Food Programs Reporting System
(FPRS).
Respondents: State agencies that administer SNAP.
Number of Respondents: 53.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent:
Financial Status Report (FNS-778): 53 State agencies averaging 5
responses per respondent for the current fiscal year and an estimated 3
responses per year for prior year adjustments and corrections (if
needed).
Estimated Total Annual Responses (FNS-778): 424.
Financial Status Report Addendum (FNS-778A): 7 State agencies
averaging 5 responses per respondent.
Estimated Total Annual Responses (FNS-778A): 35.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 4,646.
The State agencies submit the financial status report (FNS-778) for
the current year for administrative costs at an estimate of 16.8 hours
per respondent, or 4,452 total hours. The 53 State agencies submit
revised expenditure reports on the FNS-778 (for prior years) for which
we estimate 1 hour per respondent for an additional 159 hours annually.
The use of the electronic system will minimize the burden to State
agencies for a revised report. Seven (7) State agencies will submit the
FNS-778A which is estimated at 1 hour per respondent or a total of 35
hours annually.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time per
Affected public Forms Number of Frequency of Total annual response Annual burden
respondents response responses (hrs) hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Agencies............................ FNS-778 (Initial Submission) 53 5 265 16.8 4,452.00
[[Page 15243]]
FNS-778 (for 2-year 53 3 159 1 159.00
revisions).
FNS-778A.................... 7 5 35 1 35.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Burden Estimates................ ............................ 53 .............. 459 .............. 4,646.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: March 31, 2009.
E. Enrique Gomez,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
[[Page 15244]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.000
[[Page 15245]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.001
[[Page 15246]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.002
[[Page 15247]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.003
[[Page 15248]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.004
[[Page 15249]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.005
[[Page 15250]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.006
[[Page 15251]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03AP09.007
[FR Doc. E9-7509 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-C