Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge, Jackson, Jennings, and Monroe Counties, IN, 15297-15298 [E9-7482]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
neidl.od.nih.gov/. For additional
information concerning this meeting,
contact Ms. Laurie Lewallen, Advisory
Committee Coordinator, Office of
Biotechnology Activities, Office of
Science Policy, Office of the Director,
National Institutes of Health, 6705
Rockledge Drive, Room 750, Bethesda,
MD 20892–7985; telephone 301–496–
9838; e-mail lewallenl@od.nih.gov.
Dated: March 31, 2009.
Amy P. Patterson,
Acting Director, Office of Science Policy,
National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E9–7704 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5280–N–12]
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
DATES: Effective Date: April 3, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC
20410; telephone (202) 708–1234; TTY
number for the hearing- and speechimpaired (202) 708–2565 (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
Dated: March 26, 2009.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. E9–7180 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–R–2008–N0323 ; 30136–1265–
0000–S3]
Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge,
Jackson, Jennings, and Monroe
Counties, IN
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Draft
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and draft
environmental assessment (EA) for
Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR) for public review and comment.
In this draft CCP/EA, we describe how
we propose to manage the refuge for the
next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
May 6, 2009. An open house style
meeting will be held during the
comment period to receive comments
and provide information on the draft
plan. Special mailings, newspaper
articles, Internet postings, and other
media announcements will inform
people of the meetings and
opportunities for written comments.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods. You may also
drop off comments in person at
Muscatatuck NWR.
• Agency Web Site: View or
download a copy of the document and
comment at https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/planning/Muscatatuck.
• E-mail: r3planning@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Muscatatuck Draft CCP/EA’’ in
the subject line of the message.
• Fax: 812–522–6826.
• Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager,
Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge,
12985 East U.S. Highway 50, Seymour,
IN 47274–8518.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marc Webber, 812–522–4352.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Muscatatuck NWR, which
was started with the notice of intent we
published in 72 FR 27587–27588, May
16, 2007. For more about the initial
process and the history of this refuge,
see that notice.
Muscatatuck NWR was approved by
the Migratory Bird Conservation
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15297
Commission and established in 1966 to
provide duck breeding and migration
habitat. The Refuge covers 7,802 acres,
including the 78-acre ‘Restle’ unit
donated to the FWS located 45 miles
northwest of the refuge. Muscatatuck is
also responsible for nine Farm Service
Agency (FSA) conservation easements
in surrounding counties, totaling 130.5
acres.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd-668ee), requires us to develop a
comprehensive conservation plan for
each national wildlife refuge. The
purpose in developing a CCP is to
provide refuge managers with a 15-year
strategy for achieving refuge purposes
and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System,
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and our policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, plans identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred
Alternative
Priority Issues
During the public scoping process,
we, other stakeholders and partners, and
the public identified several priority
issues, which include habitat
management, invasive species control,
and demand for additional recreation
opportunities and visitor services. To
address these issues, we developed and
evaluated the following alternatives
during the planning process.
Alternative A: Current Management
Direction and Activities (No Action)
The current management direction of
Muscatatuck NWR would be maintained
under this alternative. For NEPA
purposes, this is referred to as the ‘‘No
Action’’ alternative, a misnomer as some
changes will occur over the next 15
years. Management includes
conservation, restoration, and
preservation but occurs
opportunistically as budgets allow.
Natural processes would play a large
role in the transition and succession of
habitats, with little active management.
Farming and water management would
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
15298
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 63 / Friday, April 3, 2009 / Notices
continue in those areas where it
currently exists. Some programs,
especially environmental education and
outreach, would see improvements only
if budgets increase in the future.
Alternative B: Increased Restoration of
Natural Processes; Maintain Focus on
Priority General Public Uses
Under Alternative B, we will focus on
natural processes and promote natural
habitat succession on the refuge. Many
of the constructed management areas
(moist soil units, open waters, green-tree
reservoirs, and agricultural areas) are
restored to more natural or historic
landscape conditions. Management will
increase in the areas of forestry and
invasive and pest species control, and
the hunting seasons are expanded for
most game animals. This alternative
proposes a reduction in the number of
trails and fishing areas to reduce
disturbances to wildlife.
Alternative C: Balance Natural
Processes and Constructed Management
Units; Increased Focus on High Quality
Priority General Public Uses (Preferred
Alternative)
Under Alternative C, we will increase
the Refuge’s forest acreage and decrease
the active management of some
constructed management units. Former
farmland areas are either forested or
managed as open areas to increase the
overall diversity of refuge habitat.
Management will increase in the areas
of forestry and invasive and pest species
control, and hunting and fishing
opportunities are expanded. The quality
of wildlife observation, photography,
and interpretation are all improved in
this alternative.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Alternative D: Intensified Management
of Constructed Management Units;
Expanded Priority General Public Uses
Under Alternative D, we will increase
both the Refuge’s forest acreage and its
active management of constructed
management areas (moist soil units,
open waters, green-tree reservoirs, and
agricultural areas). Wildlife observation
is enhanced by placing additional
acreage in agricultural production and
by maintaining open, non-forested
areas. In this alternative, more active
forest management and invasive and
pest species control are proposed,
hunting opportunities and seasons for
most game animals are expanded,
fishing opportunities are available at
nearly all available waters, and the
quality of wildlife observation,
photography, and interpretation are all
improved.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:07 Apr 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
Public Meeting
We will give the public an
opportunity to provide comments at a
public meeting. You may obtain the
schedule from the addresses listed in
this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may
also submit comments anytime during
the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should know that your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: February 11, 2009.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. E9–7482 Filed 4–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Jackson Hole Airport Use Agreement
Extension, Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, Grand Teton National Park,
WY
AGENCY: National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Jackson Hole Airport Use
Agreement Extension, Grand Teton
National Park.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park
Service announces the availability of a
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Jackson Hole Airport Use
Agreement Extension for Grand Teton
National Park, Wyoming. This effort
addresses a request from the Jackson
Hole Airport Board to amend the use
agreement between the Department of
the Interior and the Airport Board in
order to ensure that the airport remains
eligible for funding through the Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA). The
proposal would allow the agreement to
be amended to provide two additional
10-year options that could be exercised
by the Board, the first in 2013 and the
second in 2023. By exercising these
options, the Board would ensure that
the airport remains eligible for Airport
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Improvement Program grants from the
FAA, upon which commercial airports
are dependent. These grants provide
funds for projects such as maintenance
of the runway and taxiways, purchase of
capital equipment such as snowplows
and fire engines, and other projects
necessary for the airport to retain its
certification as a commercial airport.
Without such funds, the airport would
at some point be unable to retain its
certification and all commercial air
service would be terminated.
Alternatives considered in the EIS
include Alternative 1: No Action—The
airport would continue operations
under the existing agreement which
currently has an expiration date of April
27, 2033; and Alternative 2: Extend
Agreement—Jackson Hole Airport Board
proposal to extend the agreement for an
additional two 10-year terms, bringing
the expiration date to April 27, 2053.
Alternative 2 is the Preferred
Alternative.
The Jackson Hole Airport is located
on 533 acres of land within Grand Teton
National Park. The airport operates
under the terms and conditions of a
1983 agreement between the
Department of the Interior and the
Jackson Hole Airport Board. The 1983
agreement was for a primary term of 30
years, with options for two 10-year
extensions, both of which have been
exercised. The agreement also includes
a provision that further extensions,
amendments, or modifications could be
negotiated by the parties on mutually
satisfactory terms, and that the parties
agree that upon expiration of the
agreement, a mutually satisfactory
extension could be negotiated.
In November 2006, a scoping notice
soliciting public comments was
circulated describing the purpose and
need for the project. Based on comments
received and subsequent data gathered,
the National Park Service determined
the preparation of an EIS was warranted
and a Draft EIS was prepared. The
Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS was
published in the Federal Register on
August 9, 2007.
DATES: The National Park Service will
accept comments on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement from
the public for 60 days after the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes a Notice of Availability. No
public meetings are scheduled at this
time.
ADDRESSES: Information will be
available for public review and
comment online at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/GRTE, in the
office of the Superintendent, Mary
Gibson Scott, Grand Teton National
E:\FR\FM\03APN1.SGM
03APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 63 (Friday, April 3, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15297-15298]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7482]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-R-2008-N0323 ; 30136-1265-0000-S3]
Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge, Jackson, Jennings, and
Monroe Counties, IN
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: Draft comprehensive conservation plan
and environmental assessment; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and draft
environmental assessment (EA) for Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/EA, we describe
how we propose to manage the refuge for the next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by May 6, 2009. An open house style meeting will be held during the
comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft
plan. Special mailings, newspaper articles, Internet postings, and
other media announcements will inform people of the meetings and
opportunities for written comments.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods. You may also drop off comments in person at
Muscatatuck NWR.
Agency Web Site: View or download a copy of the document
and comment at https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/Muscatatuck.
E-mail: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ``Muscatatuck Draft
CCP/EA'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: 812-522-6826.
Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Muscatatuck National
Wildlife Refuge, 12985 East U.S. Highway 50, Seymour, IN 47274-8518.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Webber, 812-522-4352.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Muscatatuck NWR,
which was started with the notice of intent we published in 72 FR
27587-27588, May 16, 2007. For more about the initial process and the
history of this refuge, see that notice.
Muscatatuck NWR was approved by the Migratory Bird Conservation
Commission and established in 1966 to provide duck breeding and
migration habitat. The Refuge covers 7,802 acres, including the 78-acre
`Restle' unit donated to the FWS located 45 miles northwest of the
refuge. Muscatatuck is also responsible for nine Farm Service Agency
(FSA) conservation easements in surrounding counties, totaling 130.5
acres.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), requires us to develop a comprehensive
conservation plan for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy
for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of
the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with sound principles
of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and our
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, plans identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation, wildlife
photography, and environmental education and interpretation.
CCP Alternatives and Our Preferred Alternative
Priority Issues
During the public scoping process, we, other stakeholders and
partners, and the public identified several priority issues, which
include habitat management, invasive species control, and demand for
additional recreation opportunities and visitor services. To address
these issues, we developed and evaluated the following alternatives
during the planning process.
Alternative A: Current Management Direction and Activities (No Action)
The current management direction of Muscatatuck NWR would be
maintained under this alternative. For NEPA purposes, this is referred
to as the ``No Action'' alternative, a misnomer as some changes will
occur over the next 15 years. Management includes conservation,
restoration, and preservation but occurs opportunistically as budgets
allow. Natural processes would play a large role in the transition and
succession of habitats, with little active management. Farming and
water management would
[[Page 15298]]
continue in those areas where it currently exists. Some programs,
especially environmental education and outreach, would see improvements
only if budgets increase in the future.
Alternative B: Increased Restoration of Natural Processes; Maintain
Focus on Priority General Public Uses
Under Alternative B, we will focus on natural processes and promote
natural habitat succession on the refuge. Many of the constructed
management areas (moist soil units, open waters, green-tree reservoirs,
and agricultural areas) are restored to more natural or historic
landscape conditions. Management will increase in the areas of forestry
and invasive and pest species control, and the hunting seasons are
expanded for most game animals. This alternative proposes a reduction
in the number of trails and fishing areas to reduce disturbances to
wildlife.
Alternative C: Balance Natural Processes and Constructed Management
Units; Increased Focus on High Quality Priority General Public Uses
(Preferred Alternative)
Under Alternative C, we will increase the Refuge's forest acreage
and decrease the active management of some constructed management
units. Former farmland areas are either forested or managed as open
areas to increase the overall diversity of refuge habitat. Management
will increase in the areas of forestry and invasive and pest species
control, and hunting and fishing opportunities are expanded. The
quality of wildlife observation, photography, and interpretation are
all improved in this alternative.
Alternative D: Intensified Management of Constructed Management Units;
Expanded Priority General Public Uses
Under Alternative D, we will increase both the Refuge's forest
acreage and its active management of constructed management areas
(moist soil units, open waters, green-tree reservoirs, and agricultural
areas). Wildlife observation is enhanced by placing additional acreage
in agricultural production and by maintaining open, non-forested areas.
In this alternative, more active forest management and invasive and
pest species control are proposed, hunting opportunities and seasons
for most game animals are expanded, fishing opportunities are available
at nearly all available waters, and the quality of wildlife
observation, photography, and interpretation are all improved.
Public Meeting
We will give the public an opportunity to provide comments at a
public meeting. You may obtain the schedule from the addresses listed
in this notice (see addresses). You may also submit comments anytime
during the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should know
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: February 11, 2009.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. E9-7482 Filed 4-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P