South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company; Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 15008-15009 [E9-7418]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
15008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 62 / Thursday, April 2, 2009 / Notices
(c) VETS 402A or B (Proposed): 2
Hours, Range 1–3 Hours.
(d) VETS 501 (Proposed): 2 Hours,
Range 1–3 Hours.
(e) VETS 601 (Proposed): 1 Hour,
Range 0.5–1.5 Hours.
Frequency of Response: Annually
and/or Quarterly.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
(a) VETS 201 (Proposed): 2,000.
(b) VETS 401 (Proposed): 53.
(c) VETS 402A or B (Proposed): 53.
(d) VETS 501 (Proposed): 53.
(e) VETS 601 (Proposed): 40.
Total Annualized Capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Initial Annual Costs: $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the agency’s request for
OMB approval of the information
collection request. Comments will
become a matter of public record.
Dated in Washington, DC, this 27th day of
March, 2009.
John M. McWilliam,
Deputy Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–7341 Filed 4–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–79–P
NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
AGENCY:
National Mediation Board
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
(NMB).
SUMMARY: The Director, Office of
Administration, invites comments on
the proposed information collection
requests as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments within 30 days from
the date of this publication.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) provide interested Federal
agencies and the public an early
opportunity to comment on information
collection requests. OMB may amend or
waive the requirement for public
consultation to the extent that public
participation in the approval process
would defeat the purpose of the
information collection, violate State or
Federal law, or substantially interfere
with any agency’s ability to perform its
statutory obligations. The Director,
Office of Administration, publishes that
notice containing proposed information
collection requests prior to submission
of these requests to OMB. Each
proposed information collection
contains the following: (1) Type of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:43 Apr 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
review requested, e.g. new, revision
extension, existing or reinstatement; (2)
Title; (3) Summary of the collection; (4)
Description of the need for, and
proposed use of, the information; (5)
Respondents and frequency of
collection; and (6) Reporting and/or
Record keeping burden. OMB invites
public comment.
Currently, the National Mediation
Board is soliciting comments
concerning the proposed extension of
the Application for Investigation of
Representation Dispute and is interested
in public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
agency; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the agency enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the agency minimize the burden
of this collection on the respondents,
including through the use of
information technology.
Dated: March 30, 2009.
June D.W. King,
Director, Office of Administration, National
Mediation Board.
Application for Investigation of
Representation Dispute
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: Application for Investigation of
Representation Dispute,
OMB Number: 3140–0001.
Frequency: On occasion.
Affected Public: Carrier and Union
Officials, and employees of railroads
and airlines.
Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour
Burden:
Responses: 68 annually.
Burden Hours: 17.00.
Abstract: When a dispute arises
among a carrier’s employees as to who
will be their bargaining representative,
the National Mediation Board (NMB) is
required by Section 2, Ninth, to
investigate the dispute, to determine
who is the authorized representative, if
any, and to certify such representative.
The NMB’s duties do not arise until its
services have been invoked by a party
to the dispute. The Railway Labor Act
is silent as to how the invocation of a
representation dispute is to be
accomplished and the NMB has not
promulgated regulations requiring any
specific vehicle. Nonetheless, 29 CFR
1203.2, provides that applications for
the services of the NMB under Section
2, Ninth, to investigate representation
disputes may be made on printed forms
secured from the NMB’s Office of Legal
Affairs or on the Internet at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
www.nmb.gov/representation/
rapply.html. The application requires
the following information: The name of
the carrier involved; the name or
description of the craft or class
involved; the name of the petitioning
organization or individual; the name of
the organization currently representing
the employees, if any; the names of any
other organizations or representatives
involved in the dispute; and the
estimated number of employees in the
craft or class involved. This basic
information is essential in providing the
NMB with the details of the dispute so
that it can determine what resources
will be required to conduct an
investigation.
The extension of this form is
necessary considering the information is
used by the Board in determining such
matters as how many staff will be
required to conduct an investigation and
what other resources must be mobilized
to complete our statutory
responsibilities. Without this
information, the Board would have to
delay the commencement of the
investigation, which is contrary to the
intent of the Railway Labor Act.
Requests for copies of the proposed
information collection request may be
accessed from https://www.nmb.gov or
should be addressed to Denise Murdock,
NMB, 1301 K Street NW, Suite 250 E,
Washington, DC 20005 or addressed to
the e-mail address murdock@nmb.gov or
faxed to 202–692–5081. Please specify
the complete title of the information
collection when making your request.
Comments regarding burden and/or
the collection activity requirements
should be directed to June D.W. King at
202–692–5010 or via internet address
king@nmb.gov. Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD/TDY) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339.
[FR Doc. E9–7403 Filed 4–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7550–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52–012–COL and 52–013–
COL; ASLBP No. 09–883–06–COL–BD01]
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating
Company; Establishment of Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the
Commission dated December 29, 1972,
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR
28,710 (1972), and the Commission’s
regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300,
2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 2.318, and 2.321,
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 62 / Thursday, April 2, 2009 / Notices
notice is hereby given that an Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is
being established to preside over the
appeal from the NRC Staff’s
determination to deny requests for
access to sensitive unclassified nonsafeguards information (SUNSI) in the
following proceeding:
South Texas Project Nuclear
Operating Company
(South Texas Project Units 3 and 4)
This appeal arises from an ‘‘Order
Imposing Procedures for Access to
[SUNSI] and Safeguards Information for
Contention Preparation’’ dated February
13, 2009, which was included as part of
a Federal Register notice providing an
opportunity to petition for leave to
intervene in a hearing on the
application for a combined license for
the South Texas Project Units 3 and 4
in Matagorda County, Texas. See 74 FR
7943 (Feb. 20, 2009). By e-mail
submission dated March 2, 2009, several
individuals requested access to SUNSI
material. By letter dated March 12,
2009, the NRC Staff denied the requests.
On March 17, 2009, the requesters
appealed the Staff’s determination.
The Board is comprised of the
following Administrative Judges:
E. Roy Hawkens, Chair, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001.
Anthony J. Baratta, Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
Charles N. Kelber, Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall be filed in
accordance with the NRC E–Filing rule,
which the NRC promulgated in August
2007 (72 FR 49,139).
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th
day of March 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9–7418 Filed 4–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:43 Apr 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
Extension:
Form D and Regulation D, OMB Control
No. 3235–0076, SEC File No. 270–72.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Regulation D (17 CFR 230.501 et seq.)
sets forth rules governing the limited
offer and sale of securities without
Securities Act registration. Those
relying on Regulation D must file Form
D (17 CFR 239.500). The purpose of the
Form D is to collect empirical data,
which provides a continuing basis for
action by the Commission either in
terms of amending existing rules and
regulations or proposing new ones. In
addition, the form allows the
Commission to elicit information
necessary to assess the effectiveness of
Regulation D and Section 4(6) of the
Securities Act of 1933 (U.S.C. 77d(6)) as
capital-raising devices. Form D
information is required to obtain or
retain benefits under Regulation D.
Approximately 25,000 issuers file Form
D and it takes approximately 4 hours
per response. We estimate that 25% of
the 4 hours per response (1 hour per
response) is prepared by the issuer for
an estimated annual reporting burden of
25,000 hours (1 hour per response ×
25,000 responses).
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington DC 20503 or send an e-mail
to Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and
(ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria VA 22312; or
send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must
be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
15009
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Dated: March 27, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–7354 Filed 4–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Upon Written Request; Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Form TH; OMB Control No. 3235–0425;
SEC File No. 270–377.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget a
request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information
discussed below.
Form TH (17 CFR 239.65, 249.447,
269.10 and 274.404) under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.), the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), the Trust
Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa
et seq.) and the Investment Company
Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) is
used by registrants to notify the
Commission that an electronic filer is
relying on the temporary hardship
exemption for the filing of a document
in paper format that would otherwise be
required to be filed electronically as
prescribed by Rule 201(a) of Regulation
S–T (17 CFR 232.201(a)). Form TH is a
public document and is filed on
occasion. Form TH must be filed every
time an electronic filer experiences
unanticipated technical difficulties
preventing the timely preparation and
submission of a required electronic
filing. Approximately 70 registrants file
Form TH and it takes an estimated 0.33
hours per response for a total estimated
annual burden of 23 hours.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
Written comments regarding the
above information should be directed to
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer
for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102,
New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503; or send an email to Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov;
(ii) Charles Boucher, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or
send an e-mail to:
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 62 (Thursday, April 2, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15008-15009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7418]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 52-012-COL and 52-013-COL; ASLBP No. 09-883-06-COL-BD01]
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company; Establishment of
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972,
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311,
2.318, and 2.321,
[[Page 15009]]
notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
(Board) is being established to preside over the appeal from the NRC
Staff's determination to deny requests for access to sensitive
unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) in the following
proceeding:
South Texas Project Nuclear Operating Company
(South Texas Project Units 3 and 4)
This appeal arises from an ``Order Imposing Procedures for Access
to [SUNSI] and Safeguards Information for Contention Preparation''
dated February 13, 2009, which was included as part of a Federal
Register notice providing an opportunity to petition for leave to
intervene in a hearing on the application for a combined license for
the South Texas Project Units 3 and 4 in Matagorda County, Texas. See
74 FR 7943 (Feb. 20, 2009). By e-mail submission dated March 2, 2009,
several individuals requested access to SUNSI material. By letter dated
March 12, 2009, the NRC Staff denied the requests. On March 17, 2009,
the requesters appealed the Staff's determination.
The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:
E. Roy Hawkens, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Anthony J. Baratta, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
Charles N. Kelber, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day of March 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-7418 Filed 4-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
