Television Broadcasting Services; Derby, KS, 14103-14104 [E9-7055]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
exempts the system of records entitled
‘‘PBGC–17, Office of Inspector General
Investigative File System—PBGC’’ from
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3),
(d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and
(H), and (f) for the same reasons as
stated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section,
that is, because the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes other than
material within the scope of subsection
552a(j)(2).
(2) Reasons for exemption. The
reasons for asserting this exemption are
because the disclosure and other
requirements of the Privacy Act could
substantially compromise the efficacy
and integrity of the Office of Inspector
General operations. Disclosure could
invade the privacy of other individuals
and disclose their identity when they
were expressly promised
confidentiality. Disclosure could
interfere with the integrity of
information which would otherwise be
subject to privileges, see, e.g., 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(5), and which could interfere
with other important law enforcement
concerns, see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7).
(c) Federal Civilian or Contract
Employment—(1) Exemption. Under the
authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5),
the PBGC hereby exempts the system of
records entitled ‘‘PBGC–17, Office of
Inspector General Investigative File
System—PBGC’’ from the provisions of
5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) because
the system contains investigatory
material compiled for the purpose of
determining eligibility or qualifications
for federal civilian or contract
employment.
(2) Reason for exemption. The reason
for asserting this exemption is to protect
from disclosure the identity of a
confidential source when an express
promise of confidentiality has been
given to obtain information from
sources who would otherwise be
unwilling to provide necessary
information.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
Issued in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
March, 2009.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9–6973 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–01–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 09–650; MB Docket No. 08–101; RM–
11438]
Television Broadcasting Services; Ann
Arbor, MI
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Dismissal.
SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses
the pending rulemaking petition filed by
Paxson Communications License
Company, LLC (‘‘Paxson’’), permittee of
WPXD–DT, post-transition digital
television channel 31, which proposes
to substitute digital television channel
19 for post-transition digital television
channel 31 at Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Paxson’s proposed channel substitution
requires coordination and concurrence
with the Canadian government because
the proposed facility is located within
the Canadian coordination zone. The
Canadian government has indicated that
Paxson’s proposed channel substitution
is not acceptable. Therefore, the
Commission cannot approve Paxson’s
rulemaking petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau,
(202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Order,
MB Docket No. 08–101, adopted March
18, 2009, and released March 20, 2009.
The full text of this document is
available for public inspection and
copying during normal business hours
in the FCC’s Reference Information
Center at Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.
This document will also be available via
ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/).
(Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/
or Adobe Acrobat.) This document may
be purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail
https://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request
this document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14103
information collection burden ‘‘for
small business concerns with fewer than
25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding.
This document is not subject to the
Congressional Review Act. (The
Commission, is, therefore, not required
to submit a copy of this Order to the
Government Accountability Office,
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) since this
proposed rule is dismissed, herein.)
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E9–7032 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 09–638; MB Docket No. 09–33; RM–
11521]
Television Broadcasting Services;
Derby, KS
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Commission requests
comments on a channel substitution
proposed by Entravision Holdings, LLC
(‘‘Entravision’’), the permittee of KDCU–
DT, DTV channel 46, Derby, Kansas.
Entravision requests the substitution of
DTV channel 31 for post-transition DTV
channel 46 at Derby.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before April 14, 2009, and reply
comments on or before April 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554. In addition to filing comments
with the FCC, interested parties should
serve counsel for petitioner as follows:
Barry A. Friedman, Esq., Thompson
Hine LLP, 1920 N Street, NW., Suite
800, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Y. Denysyk,
adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media
Bureau, (202) 418–1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
09–33, adopted March 17, 2009, and
released March 19, 2009. The full text
of this document is available for public
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
14104
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC’s Reference
Information Center at Portals II, CY–
A257, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS (https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents
will be available electronically in ASCII,
Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This
document may be purchased from the
Commission’s duplicating contractor,
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–
800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this
document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio
recording, and Braille), send an e-mail
to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY). This document does not contain
proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, therefore, it does not
contain any proposed information
collection burden ‘‘for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding. Members of the public
should note that from the time a Notice
of Proposed Rule Making is issued until
the matter is no longer subject to
Commission consideration or court
review, all ex parte contacts are
prohibited in Commission proceedings,
such as this one, which involve channel
allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for
rules governing permissible ex parte
contacts.
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
Part 73 as follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.622
[Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:30 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
under Kansas, is amended by adding
DTV channel 31 and removing DTV
channel 46 at Derby.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E9–7055 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 260
[Docket No. FRA–2008–0061, Notice No. 2]
RIN 2130–AB91
Railroad Rehabilitation and
Improvement Financing Program
AGENCY: Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM); withdrawal.
SUMMARY: On June 9, 2008, FRA
published an NPRM in the Federal
Register proposing to amend the
eligibility and application form and
content criteria of the Railroad
Rehabilitation and Improvement
Finance (RRIF) Program. For the reasons
stated below, FRA has decided to
withdraw the NPRM.
DATES: The NPRM published on June 9,
2008 at 73 FR 32515 is withdrawn as of
March 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Casey Symington, Attorney Advisor,
Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., RCC–20, Mail Stop
10, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone
202–493–6349).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The NPRM was developed in order to
ensure the long-term sustainability of
the Railroad Rehabilitation and
Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program,
promote the competitiveness of the
railroad industry, and reduce the risk of
default for applicants and the Federal
government (government). The NPRM
proposed to accomplish these goals by
adding additional eligibility and
application content requirements to the
existing RRIF regulations. However,
during and after the formal comment
period on the NPRM, FRA received
adverse comments on its provisions.
After reviewing these comments, FRA
has determined that it has insufficient
information to ensure that the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provisions would achieve the stated
goals of the NPRM or to ensure that the
proposed provisions would not cause
unintended consequences on the
utilization of the RRIF program.
Accordingly, FRA is withdrawing the
NPRM.
FRA received 21 written comments in
response to the NPRM. All commenters
opposed the NPRM. Nine commenters
requested that it be withdrawn and
three commenters requested that the
NPRM be suspended or not
implemented. The majority of
comments raised concerns about the
need and purpose of the rulemaking, the
inability of the proposed rule to address
the stated goals, the negative effect of
the proposed rule on small entities and
non-railroad entities, the increased costs
and expense of complying with the
proposed rule, the NPRM’s effect of
limiting the availability of the RRIF
program and the possible resulting
reduction in rail infrastructure
investment, possible contradictions of
legislative intent, and potentially
unclear language in several of the NPRM
provisions.
The comments thoughtfully addressed
a number of issues raised through the
NPRM, and FRA appreciates the time
and effort put forth by those who
commented.
II. Reason for Withdrawal
FRA has carefully reviewed the
comments submitted pursuant to the
NPRM. Based on our review of the
comments, there is insufficient
information at this time to assure a final
rule with the proposed provisions
would not have the unintended negative
consequences anticipated by the
commenters.
FRA remains dedicated to ensuring
responsible lending through the RRIF
program. As such, this withdrawal does
not preclude the agency from issuing a
separate rulemaking concerning the
program. Should FRA decide to
undertake such a rulemaking in the
future, FRA will re-propose actions and
provide new opportunities for comment.
III. The Withdrawal
In consideration of the foregoing, the
NPRM for FRA Docket No. FRA–2008–
0061, as published in the Federal
Register on June 9, 2008 (73 FR 32515)
is hereby withdrawn.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24,
2009.
Jo Strang,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–6940 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM
30MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14103-14104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7055]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 09-638; MB Docket No. 09-33; RM-11521]
Television Broadcasting Services; Derby, KS
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a channel substitution
proposed by Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), the permittee
of KDCU-DT, DTV channel 46, Derby, Kansas. Entravision requests the
substitution of DTV channel 31 for post-transition DTV channel 46 at
Derby.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 14, 2009, and reply
comments on or before April 24, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing
comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for
petitioner as follows: Barry A. Friedman, Esq., Thompson Hine LLP, 1920
N Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk,
adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 09-33, adopted March 17,
2009, and released March 19, 2009. The full text of this document is
available for public
[[Page 14104]]
inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via
ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This document
may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-478-3160 or via e-mail https://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats
(computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send
an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432
(TTY). This document does not contain proposed information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed
information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply
to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the
time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no
longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex
parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules
governing permissible ex parte contacts.
For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments,
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Television, Television broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR Part 73 as follows:
PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
Sec. 73.622 [Amended]
2. Section 73.622(i), the Post-Transition Table of DTV Allotments
under Kansas, is amended by adding DTV channel 31 and removing DTV
channel 46 at Derby.
Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. E9-7055 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P