Television Broadcasting Services; Derby, KS, 14103-14104 [E9-7055]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules exempts the system of records entitled ‘‘PBGC–17, Office of Inspector General Investigative File System—PBGC’’ from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) for the same reasons as stated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, that is, because the system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes other than material within the scope of subsection 552a(j)(2). (2) Reasons for exemption. The reasons for asserting this exemption are because the disclosure and other requirements of the Privacy Act could substantially compromise the efficacy and integrity of the Office of Inspector General operations. Disclosure could invade the privacy of other individuals and disclose their identity when they were expressly promised confidentiality. Disclosure could interfere with the integrity of information which would otherwise be subject to privileges, see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(5), and which could interfere with other important law enforcement concerns, see, e.g., 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(7). (c) Federal Civilian or Contract Employment—(1) Exemption. Under the authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the PBGC hereby exempts the system of records entitled ‘‘PBGC–17, Office of Inspector General Investigative File System—PBGC’’ from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G) and (H), and (f) because the system contains investigatory material compiled for the purpose of determining eligibility or qualifications for federal civilian or contract employment. (2) Reason for exemption. The reason for asserting this exemption is to protect from disclosure the identity of a confidential source when an express promise of confidentiality has been given to obtain information from sources who would otherwise be unwilling to provide necessary information. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS Issued in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March, 2009. Vincent K. Snowbarger, Acting Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. E9–6973 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–01–P VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:30 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 217001 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [DA 09–650; MB Docket No. 08–101; RM– 11438] Television Broadcasting Services; Ann Arbor, MI AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Dismissal. SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses the pending rulemaking petition filed by Paxson Communications License Company, LLC (‘‘Paxson’’), permittee of WPXD–DT, post-transition digital television channel 31, which proposes to substitute digital television channel 19 for post-transition digital television channel 31 at Ann Arbor, Michigan. Paxson’s proposed channel substitution requires coordination and concurrence with the Canadian government because the proposed facility is located within the Canadian coordination zone. The Canadian government has indicated that Paxson’s proposed channel substitution is not acceptable. Therefore, the Commission cannot approve Paxson’s rulemaking petition. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk, Media Bureau, (202) 418–1600. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Order, MB Docket No. 08–101, adopted March 18, 2009, and released March 20, 2009. The full text of this document is available for public inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC’s Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/ or Adobe Acrobat.) This document may be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1–800–478–3160 or via e-mail https://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This document does not contain information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14103 information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. This document is not subject to the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not required to submit a copy of this Order to the Government Accountability Office, pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) since this proposed rule is dismissed, herein.) Federal Communications Commission. Clay C. Pendarvis, Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. E9–7032 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 73 [DA 09–638; MB Docket No. 09–33; RM– 11521] Television Broadcasting Services; Derby, KS AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a channel substitution proposed by Entravision Holdings, LLC (‘‘Entravision’’), the permittee of KDCU– DT, DTV channel 46, Derby, Kansas. Entravision requests the substitution of DTV channel 31 for post-transition DTV channel 46 at Derby. DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 14, 2009, and reply comments on or before April 24, 2009. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for petitioner as follows: Barry A. Friedman, Esq., Thompson Hine LLP, 1920 N Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk, adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media Bureau, (202) 418–1600. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 09–33, adopted March 17, 2009, and released March 19, 2009. The full text of this document is available for public E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM 30MRP1 14104 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Proposed Rules inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC’s Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY– A257, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via ECFS (https:// www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This document may be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 800–478–3160 or via e-mail https:// www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). This document does not contain proposed information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed information collection burden ‘‘for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Television, Television broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR Part 73 as follows: rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336. § 73.622 [Amended] 2. Section 73.622(i), the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments VerDate Nov<24>2008 18:30 Mar 27, 2009 Jkt 217001 under Kansas, is amended by adding DTV channel 31 and removing DTV channel 46 at Derby. Federal Communications Commission. Clay C. Pendarvis, Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. E9–7055 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration 49 CFR Part 260 [Docket No. FRA–2008–0061, Notice No. 2] RIN 2130–AB91 Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing Program AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal. SUMMARY: On June 9, 2008, FRA published an NPRM in the Federal Register proposing to amend the eligibility and application form and content criteria of the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Finance (RRIF) Program. For the reasons stated below, FRA has decided to withdraw the NPRM. DATES: The NPRM published on June 9, 2008 at 73 FR 32515 is withdrawn as of March 30, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Casey Symington, Attorney Advisor, Office of Chief Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., RCC–20, Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–493–6349). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The NPRM was developed in order to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program, promote the competitiveness of the railroad industry, and reduce the risk of default for applicants and the Federal government (government). The NPRM proposed to accomplish these goals by adding additional eligibility and application content requirements to the existing RRIF regulations. However, during and after the formal comment period on the NPRM, FRA received adverse comments on its provisions. After reviewing these comments, FRA has determined that it has insufficient information to ensure that the proposed PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 provisions would achieve the stated goals of the NPRM or to ensure that the proposed provisions would not cause unintended consequences on the utilization of the RRIF program. Accordingly, FRA is withdrawing the NPRM. FRA received 21 written comments in response to the NPRM. All commenters opposed the NPRM. Nine commenters requested that it be withdrawn and three commenters requested that the NPRM be suspended or not implemented. The majority of comments raised concerns about the need and purpose of the rulemaking, the inability of the proposed rule to address the stated goals, the negative effect of the proposed rule on small entities and non-railroad entities, the increased costs and expense of complying with the proposed rule, the NPRM’s effect of limiting the availability of the RRIF program and the possible resulting reduction in rail infrastructure investment, possible contradictions of legislative intent, and potentially unclear language in several of the NPRM provisions. The comments thoughtfully addressed a number of issues raised through the NPRM, and FRA appreciates the time and effort put forth by those who commented. II. Reason for Withdrawal FRA has carefully reviewed the comments submitted pursuant to the NPRM. Based on our review of the comments, there is insufficient information at this time to assure a final rule with the proposed provisions would not have the unintended negative consequences anticipated by the commenters. FRA remains dedicated to ensuring responsible lending through the RRIF program. As such, this withdrawal does not preclude the agency from issuing a separate rulemaking concerning the program. Should FRA decide to undertake such a rulemaking in the future, FRA will re-propose actions and provide new opportunities for comment. III. The Withdrawal In consideration of the foregoing, the NPRM for FRA Docket No. FRA–2008– 0061, as published in the Federal Register on June 9, 2008 (73 FR 32515) is hereby withdrawn. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2009. Jo Strang, Acting Deputy Administrator. [FR Doc. E9–6940 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–06–P E:\FR\FM\30MRP1.SGM 30MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14103-14104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 09-638; MB Docket No. 09-33; RM-11521]


Television Broadcasting Services; Derby, KS

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a channel substitution 
proposed by Entravision Holdings, LLC (``Entravision''), the permittee 
of KDCU-DT, DTV channel 46, Derby, Kansas. Entravision requests the 
substitution of DTV channel 31 for post-transition DTV channel 46 at 
Derby.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 14, 2009, and reply 
comments on or before April 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Office of the Secretary, 
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing 
comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve counsel for 
petitioner as follows: Barry A. Friedman, Esq., Thompson Hine LLP, 1920 
N Street, NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Y. Denysyk, 
adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media Bureau, (202) 418-1600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 09-33, adopted March 17, 
2009, and released March 19, 2009. The full text of this document is 
available for public

[[Page 14104]]

inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC's 
Reference Information Center at Portals II, CY-A257, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via 
ECFS (https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents will be available 
electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This document 
may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best 
Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-478-3160 or via e-mail https://www.BCPIWEB.com. To request this document in accessible formats 
(computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send 
an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission's Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 
(TTY). This document does not contain proposed information collection 
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 
104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any proposed 
information collection burden ``for small business concerns with fewer 
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief 
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the 
time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no 
longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex 
parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this 
one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules 
governing permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Television, Television broadcasting.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR Part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES

    1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.622  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.622(i), the Post-Transition Table of DTV Allotments 
under Kansas, is amended by adding DTV channel 31 and removing DTV 
channel 46 at Derby.

Federal Communications Commission.
Clay C. Pendarvis,
Associate Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
 [FR Doc. E9-7055 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.