U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Notice of Meeting; Notice of Intent (NOI) To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Proposed Realignment of a Portion of National Guard Avenue and Construction of the New Main Gate for the 158th Fighter Wing, Vermont Air National Guard at Burlington International Airport, Burlington, VT, 14108-14109 [E9-7054]
Download as PDF
14108
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Notices
review. Therefore, in accordance with
the above–referenced regulation, the
Department is initiating a changed–
circumstances review.
SKF Aeroengine claims that the
information contained in its February 6,
2009, request demonstrates that SKF
Aeroengine is the successor–in-interest
to SNFA and requests that the
Department thus refrain from issuing a
changed–circumstances questionnaire.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(2) and (4) and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(3)(i), we may issue a
questionnaire requesting factual
information for the review and will
publish a notice of preliminary results
of the antidumping duty changed–
circumstances review in the Federal
Register. The notice will set forth the
factual and legal conclusions upon
which our preliminary results are based.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4)(ii),
interested parties will have an
opportunity to comment on the
preliminary results of review. We will
issue our final results of review no later
than the regulatory deadline in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.216(e).
During the course of this antidumping
duty changed–circumstances review, we
will not change the cash–deposit
requirements for the subject
merchandise. The cash–deposit rate will
be altered, if warranted, pursuant only
to the final results of this changed–
circumstances review.
This notice of initiation is in
accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the
Act, 19 CFR 351.216(b) and (d), and 19
CFR 351.221(b)(1).
Dated: March 23, 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–7018 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Notice of Roundtable on Cribs and
Other Sleeping Environments for
Infants
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: On August 14, 2008, the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement
Act (CPSIA) of 2008 was signed into
law. Section 104 of the CPSIA requires
the Commission to study and develop
safety standards for durable infant and
toddler products. The Commission is
charged with examining and assessing
the effectiveness of any voluntary
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:33 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
consumer product safety standards for
these products in consultation with
representatives of consumer groups,
juvenile product manufacturers, and
independent child product engineers
and experts. As part of the consultation
process, the Commission will hold a
Roundtable on Cribs and Other Sleeping
Environments for Infants.
DATES: The Roundtable will be held
from 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on Wednesday,
April 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: The Roundtable will be
held at CPSC’s headquarters building at
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
Maryland 20814, 4th Floor Hearing
Room. There is no charge to attend the
Roundtable. If you are interested in
attending, you must register online at
https://www.cpsc.gov. Click on the link
entitled ‘‘CPSC Staff Roundtable: Cribs
and Other Sleeping Environments for
Infants’’ under ‘‘What’s Hot’’ near the
bottom of the home page. This link also
has more information about the
Roundtable.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia L. Hackett, Directorate for
Engineering Sciences, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, 4330 East
West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland
20814; telephone (301) 504–7577 or email: phackett@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
14, 2008, the CPSIA was signed into
law. Section 104 of the CPSIA requires
the Commission to study and develop
safety standards for durable infant and
toddler products. Section 104 of the
CPSIA requires the Commission to
examine and assess the effectiveness of
any voluntary consumer product safety
standards for these products in
consultation with representatives of
consumer groups, juvenile product
manufacturers, and independent child
product engineers and experts. Section
104(b)(1)(B) of the CPSIA requires the
Commission to promulgate consumer
product safety standards that are
substantially the same as such voluntary
standards or are more stringent than
such voluntary standards if the
Commission determines that more
stringent standards would further
reduce the risk of injury associated with
such products.
The purpose of the Roundtable is to
consult with interested stakeholders
pursuant to section 104 of the CPSIA
and to solicit input regarding the
adequacy of the current voluntary and
mandatory standards. At the
Roundtable, CPSC staff intends to
review recent incident data and provide
copies of comments received from the
Advance Notice of Proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rulemaking on Cribs, published on
November 25, 2008 at 73 FR 71570.
All attendees will have the
opportunity to ask questions or make
comments at the Roundtable. For those
attendees interested in making a formal
presentation, please e-mail an abstract
of 100 words or less, preferably in a
Word format, with ‘‘Crib Roundtable
Abstract’’ written in the subject line of
the e-mail. The e-mail should be sent to
Patricia Hackett at phackett@cpsc.gov
no later than April 6, 2009. The
abstracts may be edited for inclusion in
the agenda for the Roundtable. In
addition, please inform Patricia Hackett
of any special equipment needs required
to make a presentation. While an effort
will be made to accommodate all
persons who wish to make a
presentation, the time allotted for
presentations will depend on the
number of persons who wish to speak
on a given topic and the Roundtable
schedule. If a presenter wishes
attendees to have copies of his/her
presentation or other handouts, the
presenter should bring copies to the
Roundtable. Please note that all
comments should be restricted to cribs,
bassinets, play yards, and the current
voluntary or mandatory standards
pertaining to these products.
Accessories, including mattresses,
bedding, crib tents, sleep positioners,
etc., while of concern to the staff, will
not be addressed at this Roundtable.
Dated: March 25, 2009.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–7034 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory
Board Notice of Meeting; Notice of
Intent (NOI) To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Proposed Realignment of a Portion
of National Guard Avenue and
Construction of the New Main Gate for
the 158th Fighter Wing, Vermont Air
National Guard at Burlington
International Airport, Burlington, VT
National Guard Bureau.
Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 59 / Monday, March 30, 2009 / Notices
of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508), and
Air Force policy and procedures (32
CFR Part 989), the National Guard
Bureau is issuing this notice to advise
the public of its intent to prepare an EIS
to evaluate the potential environmental
impacts that could result from the
proposed realignment of a portion of
National Guard Avenue, and
construction of a new main gate at the
158th Fighter Wing (158 FW)
installation at Burlington International
Airport.
A recent evaluation of infrastructure
security at the installation identified
several vulnerabilities revealing a
potential threat to mission-critical
resources. Realignment of a segment of
National Guard Avenue would remedy
some of these vulnerabilities, and
protect mission-critical resources. Work
conducted would be in compliance with
anti-terrorism/force protection (AT/FP)
standoff criteria. Preliminary studies
indicate that potential significant
adverse effects to wetlands and to
sensitive Native American sites may
result from realignment of the roadway.
In addition to the road segment
realignment, the 158 FW would also
construct a new main gate along a
portion of the realigned roadway,
construct a new Security Forces facility,
which would be collocated with the
new main gate, and construct an
internal roadway loop that would
improve vehicular safety and circulation
to a portion of the installation.
In addition to the proposed action,
another action alternative will evaluate
the potential impacts of an alternative
roadway alignment for National Guard
Avenue, and redesigning the main gate
in its current location to meet AT/FP
criteria. The Security Forces and
internal roadway loop would remain as
described under the Proposed Action.
The no-action alternative will also be
analyzed in the EIS.
The National Guard Bureau will
conduct a scoping meeting to solicit
public input concerning the proposal.
The scoping process will help identify
issues to be addressed in the
environmental analysis. Comments will
be accepted at any time during the
environmental impact analysis process.
However, to ensure the Air Force has
sufficient time to consider public input
in the preparation of the Draft EIS,
comments should be submitted to the
address below by 16 April 2009.
Notices will be posted and published
in the Burlington Free Press. The
scoping meetings will be held at the
South Burlington High School, Cafeteria
#2, 550 Dorset Street, South Burlington,
VT 05403, on 16 April 2009, from 6–9
p.m.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:33 Mar 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please direct any written comments or
requests for information to Robert
Dogan, NGB/A7AM, at Conaway Hall,
3500 Fetchet Avenue, Andrews Air
Force Base, Maryland 20762–5157; (301)
836–8859; or fax (301) 836–7428.
Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–7054 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
14109
reviewed the value and effectiveness of
the approved alternative arrangements.
This notice announces the public
availability of the Navy’s report to the
CEQ. The full text of the report is
available for public viewing on the Web
site established for the SOCAL Range
Complex EIS at https://
www.socalrangecomplexeis.com.
Dated: March 25, 2009.
A. M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–7049 Filed 3–27–09; 8:45 am]
Department of the Navy
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
Notice of Availability of Department of
the Navy Report to the Council on
Environmental Quality on the Use of
Alternative Arrangements
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Navy
(Navy) announces the availability of its
report to the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) on the value and
effectiveness of the Alternative
Arrangements for the U.S. Navy’s
Composite Training Unit Exercises
(COMPTUEXs) and Joint Task Force
Exercises (JTFEXs) that occurred
between January 15, 2008 and January
23, 2009, in the Southern California
(SOCAL) Operating Area. The full text
of the Navy’s report to the CEQ is
available for public viewing on the Web
site established for the SOCAL Range
Complex Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) at https://
www.socalrangecomplexeis.com.
SUMMARY:
On
January 15, 2008, the Navy accepted
alternative arrangements approved by
the CEQ, for implementing the
procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq. for five COMPTUEXs
and four JTFEXs that occurred between
January 15, 2008 and January 23, 2009
in the SOCAL Operating Area. These
alternative arrangements specifically
addressed the use of mid-frequency
active (MFA) sonar and its effects on
marine mammals during Navy exercises
in the SOCAL Operating Area.
The Secretary of the Navy’s decision
memorandum documenting the Navy’s
acceptance of these alternative
arrangements was published in the
Federal Register on January 24, 2008.
The decision memorandum provided
that, after the conclusion of the
alternative arrangements, and no later
than March 23, 2009, the Navy would
provide a report to the CEQ that
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Intent To Repay to the Northwest
Indian College Funds Recovered as a
Result of a Final Audit Determination
Department of Education.
Notice of intent to award
grantback funds.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Education (Secretary) intends to repay
to the Northwest Indian College (NWIC)
an amount that represents
approximately 57 percent of the amount
of funds recovered by the Department of
Education (Department) as a result of
final audit determinations for audit
findings covering fiscal years 1999–
2001. The Department’s recovery of
funds followed resolution of the audit
disallowances identified in a September
30, 2004 Program Determination Letter
(PDL) issued by the Office of Vocational
and Adult Education (OVAE) for the
period of July 1, 1999 through
November 26, 2001. The PDL sought
recovery of $316,096. On December 1,
2004, NWIC appealed the monetary
findings in the September 30, 2004 PDL
to the Department’s Office of the
Administrative Law Judges (OALJ).
Following discussions and exchanges of
information between the parties, on
March 27, 2006, the parties entered into
a Repayment Agreement (Agreement)
that fully resolved the issues in the
proceeding and under which NWIC
agreed to repay the Department
$316,096. The NWIC has repaid the full
amount in accordance with the
Agreement.
This notice describes NWIC’s plan for
the use of a portion of the repaid funds
and the terms and conditions under
which the Secretary intends to make
grantback funds available to NWIC.
This notice invites comments on the
proposed grantback.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on or before April 29, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\30MRN1.SGM
30MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 59 (Monday, March 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14108-14109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-7054]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
U.S. Air Force Scientific Advisory Board Notice of Meeting;
Notice of Intent (NOI) To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for Proposed Realignment of a Portion of National Guard Avenue
and Construction of the New Main Gate for the 158th Fighter Wing,
Vermont Air National Guard at Burlington International Airport,
Burlington, VT
AGENCY: National Guard Bureau.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural
Provisions
[[Page 14109]]
of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and Air Force policy and procedures
(32 CFR Part 989), the National Guard Bureau is issuing this notice to
advise the public of its intent to prepare an EIS to evaluate the
potential environmental impacts that could result from the proposed
realignment of a portion of National Guard Avenue, and construction of
a new main gate at the 158th Fighter Wing (158 FW) installation at
Burlington International Airport.
A recent evaluation of infrastructure security at the installation
identified several vulnerabilities revealing a potential threat to
mission-critical resources. Realignment of a segment of National Guard
Avenue would remedy some of these vulnerabilities, and protect mission-
critical resources. Work conducted would be in compliance with anti-
terrorism/force protection (AT/FP) standoff criteria. Preliminary
studies indicate that potential significant adverse effects to wetlands
and to sensitive Native American sites may result from realignment of
the roadway. In addition to the road segment realignment, the 158 FW
would also construct a new main gate along a portion of the realigned
roadway, construct a new Security Forces facility, which would be
collocated with the new main gate, and construct an internal roadway
loop that would improve vehicular safety and circulation to a portion
of the installation.
In addition to the proposed action, another action alternative will
evaluate the potential impacts of an alternative roadway alignment for
National Guard Avenue, and redesigning the main gate in its current
location to meet AT/FP criteria. The Security Forces and internal
roadway loop would remain as described under the Proposed Action. The
no-action alternative will also be analyzed in the EIS.
The National Guard Bureau will conduct a scoping meeting to solicit
public input concerning the proposal. The scoping process will help
identify issues to be addressed in the environmental analysis. Comments
will be accepted at any time during the environmental impact analysis
process. However, to ensure the Air Force has sufficient time to
consider public input in the preparation of the Draft EIS, comments
should be submitted to the address below by 16 April 2009.
Notices will be posted and published in the Burlington Free Press.
The scoping meetings will be held at the South Burlington High School,
Cafeteria 2, 550 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403, on
16 April 2009, from 6-9 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct any written comments or
requests for information to Robert Dogan, NGB/A7AM, at Conaway Hall,
3500 Fetchet Avenue, Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland 20762-5157; (301)
836-8859; or fax (301) 836-7428.
Bao-Anh Trinh,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-7054 Filed 3-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P