Maryland; Adequacy Status of the 2008 Reasonable Further Progress Plan for the Maryland Portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets, 13433-13434 [E9-6878]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices
Dated: March 13, 2009.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9–6881 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
EPA’s finding, the State of Maryland
must use the MVEBs from the June 4,
2007 RFP Plan for future conformity
determinations for the 8-hour ozone
standard. This finding has also been
announced on EPA’s conformity Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/pastsips.htm.
The adequate MVEBs are provided in
the following table:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
TABLE 1—MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE
EMISSIONS BUDGETS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anne Foster, 1445 Ross Avenue, Ste.
1200 (RC–S) Dallas, Texas 75202–2733
or call (214) 665–2169.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
[FRL–8787–3]
Maryland; Adequacy Status of the 2008
Reasonable Further Progress Plan for
the Baltimore 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is
notifying the public that we have found
that the Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets (MVEBs) in the Reasonable
Further Progress Plan (RFP) submitted
as a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision on June 4, 2007 by the
Maryland Department of the
Environment, (MDE) are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. As
a result of EPA’s finding, the State of
Maryland must use the MVEBs from the
June 4, 2007 RFP Plan for future
conformity determinations for the 8hour ozone standard.
DATES: These MVEBs are effective April
13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Kotsch, U.S. EPA, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19103 at (215) 814–3335 or by e-mail at:
kotsch.martin@EPA.gov. The finding is
available at EPA’s conformity Web site:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. The word
‘‘budgets’’ refers to the motor vehicle
emission budgets for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides
(NOx). The word ‘‘SIP’’ in this
document refers to the RFP Plans for the
Baltimore 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment
Area submitted to EPA as SIP revisions
on June 4, 2007.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that EPA has
already made. EPA Region III sent a
letter to MDE on January 15, 2009
stating that the MVEBs in the RFP Plan
are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. As a result of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Mar 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
13433
Nonattainment area
2008 Reasonable further
progress
VOC (tpd)
Baltimore ...
41.2
NOX (tpd)
106.8
Transportation conformity is required
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act,
as amended in 1990. EPA’s conformity
rule requires that transportation plans,
programs and projects conform to state
air quality implementation plans and
establishes the criteria andprocedure for
determining whether or not they do.
Conformity to a SIP means that
transportation activities will not
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission
budgets are adequate for conformity
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
93.118(e)(4). Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and it also should
not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
approval of the SIP. Even if we find a
budget adequate, the SIP could later be
disapproved. We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in 40 CFR
93.118(f), and have followed this rule in
making our adequacy determination.
Dated: March 10, 2009.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E9–6883 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FRL–8787–2]
Maryland; Adequacy Status of the 2008
Reasonable Further Progress Plan for
the Maryland Portion of the
Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is
notifying the public that we have found
that the Motor Vehicle Emissions
Budgets (MVEBs) in the Reasonable
Further Progress Plan (RFP) submitted
as a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision on June 4, 2007 by the
Maryland Department of the
Environment, (MDE) are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. As
a result of EPA’s finding, the State of
Maryland must use the MVEBs from the
June 4, 2007 RFP Plan for future
conformity determinations for the 8hour ozone standard.
DATES: These MVEBs are effective April
13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Kotsch, U.S. EPA, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19103 at (215) 814–3335 or by e-mail at:
kotsch.martin@EPA.gov. The finding is
available at EPA’s conformity Web site:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. The word
‘‘budgets’’ refers to the motor vehicle
emission budgets for volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides
(NOx). The word ‘‘SIP’’ in this
document refers to the RFP Plans for the
Maryland portion of the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City Ozone
Nonattainment Area submitted to EPA
as SIP revisions on June 4, 2007.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that EPA has
already made. EPA Region III sent a
letter to MDE on January 15, 2009
stating that the MVEBs in the RFP Plan
are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. As a result of
EPA’s finding, the State of Maryland
must use the MVEBs from the June 4,
2007 RFP Plan for future conformity
determinations for the 8-hour ozone
standard. This finding has also been
announced on EPA’s conformity Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/pastsips.htm.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
13434
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004,
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Financial Accounting Standards
TABLE 1—MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE Advisory Board (FASAB) staff has
issued Staff Implementation Guidance
EMISSIONS BUDGETS
(SIG) 31.1: Guidance for Implementation
2008 Reasonable further
of Statement of Federal Financial
Nonattainprogress
Accounting Standards 31, Accounting
ment area
for Fiduciary Activities.
VOC (tpd)
NOX (tpd)
The SIG will be available at https://
www.fasab.gov/codifica.html.
Cecil County ...........
2.3
7.9 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wendy Payne, Executive Director, 441 G
Transportation conformity is required St., NW., Mail Stop 6K17V, Washington,
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act,
DC 20548, or call (202) 512–7350.
as amended in 1990. EPA’s conformity
Authority: Federal Advisory Committee
rule requires that transportation plans,
Act. Pub. L. No. 92463.
programs and projects conform to state
Dated: March 19, 2009.
air quality implementation plans and
Charles Jackson,
establishes the criteria and
procedure for determining whether or Federal Register Liaison.
not they do. Conformity to a SIP means
[FR Doc. E9–6389 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am]
that transportation activities will not
BILLING CODE 1610–01–M
produce new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay
timely attainment of the national
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
ambient air quality standards.
CORPORATION
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission
Agency Information Collection
budgets are adequate for conformity
Activities: Proposed Collection
purposes are outlined in 40 CFR
Renewal (3064–0151); Comment
93.118(e)(4). Please note that an
Request
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and it also should AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
approval of the SIP. Even if we find a
budget adequate, the SIP could later be
SUMMARY: The FDIC, as part of its
disapproved. We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
submitted SIP budgets in 40 CFR
93.118(f), and have followed this rule in general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
making our adequacy determination.
comment on a continuing information
Dated: March 10, 2009.
collection, as required by the Paperwork
William T. Wisniewski,
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
chapter 35). Currently, the FDIC is
[FR Doc. E9–6878 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am]
soliciting comments concerning the
following collection of information
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
titled: ‘‘Notice Regarding Assessment
Credits.’’
FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS DATES: Comments must be submitted on
ADVISORY BOARD
or before May 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
Staff Implementation Guidance
invited to submit written comments by
any of the following methods. All
AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards
comments should refer to the name and
Advisory Board.
number of the collection:
ACTION: Notice of Statement of Federal
• https://www.FDIC.gov/regulations/
Financial Accounting Standards
laws/federal/notices.html.
Advisory Board Staff Implementation
• E-mail: comments@fdic.gov.
Guidance 31.1: Guidance for
Implementation of Statement of Federal Include the name and number of the
collection in the subject line of the
Financial Accounting Standards 31,
message.
Accounting for Fiduciary Activities.
• Mail: Leneta G. Gregorie
SUMMARY: Board Action: Pursuant to the
(202.898.3719), Counsel, Federal
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
Deposit Insurance Corporation, F–1064,
L. 92–463), as amended, section
550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
10(a)(2), and the FASAB Rules Of
20429.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
The adequate MVEBs are provided in
the following table:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Mar 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Hand Delivery: Comments may be
hand-delivered to the guard station at
the rear of the 550 17th Street Building
(located on F Street), on business days
between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
A copy of the comments may also be
submitted to the OMB Desk Officer for
the FDIC: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leneta G. Gregorie, at the address
identified above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal
to renew the following currently
approved collection of information:
Title: Notice Regarding Assessment
Credits.
OMB Number: 3064–0151.
Frequency of Response: On occasion.
Affected Public: FDIC-insured
institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
15.
Estimated Time per Response: 2
hours.
Total Annual Burden: 30 hours.
General Description of Collection:
FDIC-insured institutions must notify
the FDIC if deposit insurance
assessment credits are transferred, e.g.,
through a sale of the credits or through
a merger, in order to obtain recognition
of the transfer.
Request for Comment: Comments are
invited on: (a) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the FDIC’s functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
estimate of the burden of the
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
information collection on respondents,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
At the end of the comment period, the
comments and recommendations
received will be analyzed to determine
the extent to which the collection
should be modified prior to submission
to OMB for review and approval.
Comments submitted in response to this
notice also will be summarized or
included in the FDIC’s requests to OMB
for renewal of this collection. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated at Washington, DC, dated this 24th
day of March, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13433-13434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6878]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8787-2]
Maryland; Adequacy Status of the 2008 Reasonable Further Progress
Plan for the Maryland Portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic
City 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that we have found
that the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) in the Reasonable
Further Progress Plan (RFP) submitted as a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision on June 4, 2007 by the Maryland Department of the
Environment, (MDE) are adequate for transportation conformity purposes.
As a result of EPA's finding, the State of Maryland must use the MVEBs
from the June 4, 2007 RFP Plan for future conformity determinations for
the 8-hour ozone standard.
DATES: These MVEBs are effective April 13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martin Kotsch, U.S. EPA, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103 at (215) 814-3335 or by e-mail
at: kotsch.martin@EPA.gov. The finding is available at EPA's conformity
Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/currsips.htm.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. The word ``budgets'' refers to the motor vehicle
emission budgets for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen
oxides (NOx). The word ``SIP'' in this document refers to the RFP Plans
for the Maryland portion of the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City
Ozone Nonattainment Area submitted to EPA as SIP revisions on June 4,
2007.
Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that EPA has
already made. EPA Region III sent a letter to MDE on January 15, 2009
stating that the MVEBs in the RFP Plan are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. As a result of EPA's finding, the State of
Maryland must use the MVEBs from the June 4, 2007 RFP Plan for future
conformity determinations for the 8-hour ozone standard. This finding
has also been announced on EPA's conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/pastsips.htm.
[[Page 13434]]
The adequate MVEBs are provided in the following table:
Table 1--Maryland Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 Reasonable further
progress
Nonattainment area -------------------------------
VOC (tpd) NOX (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cecil County............................ 2.3 7.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. EPA's conformity rule requires that
transportation plans, programs and projects conform to state air
quality implementation plans and establishes the criteria and
procedure for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a
SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air
quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely
attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle
emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate
from EPA's completeness review, and it also should not be used to
prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget
adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved. We have described our
process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in 40 CFR
93.118(f), and have followed this rule in making our adequacy
determination.
Dated: March 10, 2009.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E9-6878 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P