Customer Panel Quality Survey, 13421-13422 [E9-6770]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices
Alliance; and (4) Steven Fosmark. An
opportunity for public testimony was
provided during the Council meeting.
For more details on these EFP
applications and to view copies of the
applications, see the Pacific Council’s
website at www.pcouncil.org and
browse the September 2008 Briefing
Book. The Council recommended that
NMFS consider issuing the following
EFPs.
Dated: March 23, 2009.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9–6895 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am]
Community Based Fishing Association
EFP
Customer Panel Quality Survey
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)
submitted a proposal for a 2009 EFP,
along with their collaborators: City of
Morro Bay Harbor Department; Port San
Luis Commercial Fishermen’s
Association; Port San Luis Harbor
District; California Department of Fish
and Game; Morro Bay Commercial
Fishermen’s Organization, Inc.; and
Environmental Defense. The primary
purpose of the EFP is to test whether
establishing a cooperatively managed,
community based fishing association
can provide economic and
environmental performance benefits.
Recreational Chilipepper EFP
The California Recreational Fishing
Alliance (RFA) and the Golden Gate
Fishermen’s Association submitted an
application for a 2009 EFP. The primary
purpose of the EFP is to do an area–
based recreational fishing study to test
if hook and line fishing gear can be used
to access underutilized chilipepper
rockfish seaward of the non–trawl RCA,
while keeping bycatch of overfished
species low.
Recreational Yellowtail EFP
The Oregon RFA submitted an
application for a 2009 EFP. The primary
purpose of the EFP is to test if
recreational fishing gear, fitted with a
long leader to keep gear up off the ocean
floor, can be used to access
underutilized yellowtail rockfish, while
keeping bycatch of overfished species
low.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Commercial Chilipepper EFP
Steven Fosmark submitted an
application for a 2009 EFP. The primary
purpose of the EFP is to test if a specific
longline gear configuration can be used
in the commercial fishery to target
underutilized chilipepper rockfish,
while keeping bycatch of overfished
species low.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Mar 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment
request.
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this extension of a
continuing information collection, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before May 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov.
Include ‘‘0651–0057 Customer Panel
Quality Survey comment’’ in the subject
line of the message.
• Fax: 571–273–0112, marked to the
attention of Susan K. Fawcett.
• Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records
Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Administrative Management
Group, U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of
Martin Rater, Management Analyst,
Office of Patent Quality Assurance,
United States Patent and Trademark
Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA
22313–1450; by telephone at 571–272–
5966; or by e-mail at
martin.rater@uspto.gov with
‘‘Paperwork’’ in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
For over the past 10 years, the USPTO
has used surveys to obtain customer
feedback regarding the products,
services, and related service standards
of the USPTO. The USPTO used the
data to measure how well the agency is
meeting established customer service
standards, to identify any disjoints
between customer expectations and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13421
USPTO performance, and to develop
improvement strategies. Typically, these
surveys ask customers to express their
satisfaction with the USPTO’s products
and services based upon their
interactions with the agency as a whole
over a 12-month period.
In order to obtain further data
concerning customer ratings of the
USPTO’s services, service standards,
and performance, the USPTO developed
the Customer Panel Quality Survey.
This survey narrows the focus of
customer satisfaction to examination
quality and uses a longitudinal, rotating
panel design to assess changes in
customer perceptions and to identify
key areas for examiner training and
opportunities for improvement. The
USPTO plans to survey patent agents,
attorneys, and other individuals from
large domestic corporations (including
those with 500+ employees), small and
medium-size businesses, universities
and other non-profit research
organizations, and independent
inventors; however, the USPTO does
not plan to survey foreign entities.
The USPTO will draw a random
sample of these customers from their
database. Due to the rotating panel
design, some sample members will be
surveyed twice in order to measure
change over a period of time. Each year
of the survey will include four waves of
data collection.
The Customer Panel Quality Survey is
a mail survey, although respondents can
also complete the survey electronically
on the Web. The content of both
versions will be identical. A survey
packet containing the questionnaire, a
separate cover letter prepared by the
Commissioner of Patents, a postagepaid, pre-addressed return envelope,
and instructions for completing the
survey electronically will be mailed to
all sample members. A pre-notification
letter, reminder/thank you postcards,
and telephone calls will be used to
encourage response from sample
members.
This is a voluntary survey and all
responses will remain confidential. The
collected data will not be linked to the
respondent and contact information that
is used for sampling purposes will be
maintained in a separate file from the
quantitative data. Respondents are not
required to provide any identifying
information such as their name, address,
or Social Security Number. In order to
access and complete the online survey,
respondents will need to use the
username, password, and survey ID
number provided by the USPTO.
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
13422
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 58 / Friday, March 27, 2009 / Notices
II. Method of Collection
By mail or electronically over the
Internet if respondents choose to
complete the survey online.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651–0057.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; business or other for profit;
not-for-profit institutions; Federal
Government; and state, local, or Tribal
Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
3,168 responses per year. Out of a
sample size of 2,842 for each wave of
data collection, the USPTO estimates
that 792 completed surveys will be
received. Each year of the survey will
include four waves of data collection
with an estimated 3,168 completed
surveys received. Of this total, the
USPTO estimates that 70% or 2,218
surveys will be returned by mail and
that 30% or 950 surveys will be
completed using the online option.
Estimated Time per Response: The
USPTO estimates that it takes
approximately 10 minutes (0.17 hours)
to complete either the paper or online
version of this survey. This includes the
time to gather the necessary
information, complete the survey, and
submit it to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours: 539 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent
Cost Burden: $167,090. The USPTO
believes that patent attorneys will be
responding to these surveys. Using the
professional hourly rate of $310 for
attorneys in private firms, the USPTO
estimates that the total respondent cost
burden for this collection is $167,090
per year.
Estimated
annual
responses
Estimated
annual burden
hours
Item
Estimated time for response
Customer Panel Quality Survey (paper) ......................
Customer Panel Quality Survey (electronic) ................
10 minutes ....................................................................
10 minutes ....................................................................
2,218
950
377
162
Total .......................................................................
.......................................................................................
3,168
539
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour
Respondent Cost Burden: $0. There are
no capital start-up, maintenance,
operation, or recordkeeping costs, nor
are there any filing fees associated with
this information collection. The USPTO
covers the costs of all survey materials
and provides postage-paid, preaddressed return envelopes for the
completed mail surveys.
IV. Request for Comments
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Administrative
Management Group.
[FR Doc. E9–6770 Filed 3–26–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:13 Mar 26, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Army Educational Advisory Committee
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the
Sunshine in the Government Act of
1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and
41 CFR 102–3.150, the following
meeting notice is announced:
Name of Committee: U.S. Army War
College Subcommittee of the Army
Education Advisory Committee.
Date of Meeting: April 15, 2009 and
April 16, 2009.
Place of Meeting: U.S. Army War
College, 122 Forbes Avenue, Carlisle,
PA, Command Conference Room, Root
Hall, Carlisle Barracks, PA 17013.
Time of Meeting: 10:15 a.m.–4 p.m.,
15 April 2009. 8 a.m.–11:45 p.m., 16
April 2009.
Proposed Agenda: Receive
information briefings; conduct
discussions with the Commandant and
staff and faculty; attend the
Commandant’s Lecture Series and key
note speaker focused on technology and
strategy, examine College charter to the
Board that recommends the curriculum
subcommittee consider a gap analysis
approach to its process and findings;
assess an overview and proposed
growth of the International Fellows
program, assess the College’s approach
to provide academic support through a
.mil domain and considerations for a
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
.edu domain. Propose strategies and
recommendations that will continue the
momentum of Federal accreditation
success and guarantee compliance with
regional accreditation standards.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request advance approval or obtain
further information, contact Colonel
Scott Horton at 717–245–3907.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
meeting is open to the public. Interested
persons may submit a written statement
for consideration by the U.S. Army War
College Subcommittee. Written
statements should be no longer than two
type-written pages and must address:
the issue, discussion, and a
recommended course of action.
Supporting documentation may also be
included as needed to establish the
appropriate historical context and to
provide any necessary background
information.
Individuals submitting a written
statement must submit their statement
to the Designated Federal Officer at U.S.
Army War College, ATTN: Joint
Education Office, 122 Forbes Avenue,
Carlisle, PA 17013, at any point,
however, if a written statement is not
received at least 10 calendar days prior
to the meeting, which is the subject of
this notice, then it may not be provided
to or considered by the U.S. Army War
College Subcommittee until its next
open meeting.
The Designated Federal Officer will
review all timely submissions with the
U.S. Army War College Subcommittee
Chairperson, and ensure they are
provided to members of the U.S. Army
War College Subcommittee before the
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 58 (Friday, March 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13421-13422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6770]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office
Customer Panel Quality Survey
ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this extension of a continuing information
collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
E-mail: Susan.Fawcett@uspto.gov. Include ``0651-0057
Customer Panel Quality Survey comment'' in the subject line of the
message.
Fax: 571-273-0112, marked to the attention of Susan K.
Fawcett.
Mail: Susan K. Fawcett, Records Officer, Office of the
Chief Information Officer, Administrative Management Group, U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to the attention of Martin Rater, Management
Analyst, Office of Patent Quality Assurance, United States Patent and
Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450; by
telephone at 571-272-5966; or by e-mail at martin.rater@uspto.gov with
``Paperwork'' in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
For over the past 10 years, the USPTO has used surveys to obtain
customer feedback regarding the products, services, and related service
standards of the USPTO. The USPTO used the data to measure how well the
agency is meeting established customer service standards, to identify
any disjoints between customer expectations and USPTO performance, and
to develop improvement strategies. Typically, these surveys ask
customers to express their satisfaction with the USPTO's products and
services based upon their interactions with the agency as a whole over
a 12-month period.
In order to obtain further data concerning customer ratings of the
USPTO's services, service standards, and performance, the USPTO
developed the Customer Panel Quality Survey. This survey narrows the
focus of customer satisfaction to examination quality and uses a
longitudinal, rotating panel design to assess changes in customer
perceptions and to identify key areas for examiner training and
opportunities for improvement. The USPTO plans to survey patent agents,
attorneys, and other individuals from large domestic corporations
(including those with 500+ employees), small and medium-size
businesses, universities and other non-profit research organizations,
and independent inventors; however, the USPTO does not plan to survey
foreign entities.
The USPTO will draw a random sample of these customers from their
database. Due to the rotating panel design, some sample members will be
surveyed twice in order to measure change over a period of time. Each
year of the survey will include four waves of data collection.
The Customer Panel Quality Survey is a mail survey, although
respondents can also complete the survey electronically on the Web. The
content of both versions will be identical. A survey packet containing
the questionnaire, a separate cover letter prepared by the Commissioner
of Patents, a postage-paid, pre-addressed return envelope, and
instructions for completing the survey electronically will be mailed to
all sample members. A pre-notification letter, reminder/thank you
postcards, and telephone calls will be used to encourage response from
sample members.
This is a voluntary survey and all responses will remain
confidential. The collected data will not be linked to the respondent
and contact information that is used for sampling purposes will be
maintained in a separate file from the quantitative data. Respondents
are not required to provide any identifying information such as their
name, address, or Social Security Number. In order to access and
complete the online survey, respondents will need to use the username,
password, and survey ID number provided by the USPTO.
[[Page 13422]]
II. Method of Collection
By mail or electronically over the Internet if respondents choose
to complete the survey online.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0651-0057.
Form Number(s): N/A.
Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Individuals or households; business or other for
profit; not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; and state,
local, or Tribal Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,168 responses per year. Out of a
sample size of 2,842 for each wave of data collection, the USPTO
estimates that 792 completed surveys will be received. Each year of the
survey will include four waves of data collection with an estimated
3,168 completed surveys received. Of this total, the USPTO estimates
that 70% or 2,218 surveys will be returned by mail and that 30% or 950
surveys will be completed using the online option.
Estimated Time per Response: The USPTO estimates that it takes
approximately 10 minutes (0.17 hours) to complete either the paper or
online version of this survey. This includes the time to gather the
necessary information, complete the survey, and submit it to the USPTO.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours: 539 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost Burden: $167,090. The USPTO
believes that patent attorneys will be responding to these surveys.
Using the professional hourly rate of $310 for attorneys in private
firms, the USPTO estimates that the total respondent cost burden for
this collection is $167,090 per year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Estimated
Item Estimated time for response annual annual burden
responses hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Panel Quality Survey (paper)......... 10 minutes...................... 2,218 377
Customer Panel Quality Survey (electronic).... 10 minutes...................... 950 162
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................... ................................ 3,168 539
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Non-hour Respondent Cost Burden: $0. There
are no capital start-up, maintenance, operation, or recordkeeping
costs, nor are there any filing fees associated with this information
collection. The USPTO covers the costs of all survey materials and
provides postage-paid, pre-addressed return envelopes for the completed
mail surveys.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized or
included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Susan K. Fawcett,
Records Officer, USPTO, Office of the Chief Information Officer,
Administrative Management Group.
[FR Doc. E9-6770 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P