Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) Implementation in the Maritime Sector; Hazardous Materials Endorsement for a Commercial Driver's License, 13114-13116 [E9-6833]
Download as PDF
13114
§ 320.30
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
[Amended]
29. Section 320.30 is amended in
paragraph (c)(1) by removing ‘‘and
Biopharmaceutics (HFD–850), 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857’’ and
by adding in its place ‘‘, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002’’.
■
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 101
[Docket Nos. TSA–2006–24191; USCG–
2006–24196]
RIN 1652–AA41
PART 600—BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS:
GENERAL
30. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 600 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 351, 352, 355,
360, 360i, 371, 374; 42 U.S.C. 216, 262, 263,
263a, 264, 300aa–25.
§ 600.2
[Amended]
31. Section 600.2 is amended as
follows:
a. In paragraph (b)(1) by removing
‘‘(HFD–330)’’; and by removing ‘‘5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002’’; and
b. In paragraph (b)(3) by removing
‘‘(HFD–42)’’; and by removing ‘‘5600
Fishers Lane, rm. 8B45, Rockville, MD
20857’’ and adding in its place ‘‘5901–
B Ammendale Rd., Beltsville, MD
20705–1266’’.
■
Dated: March 20, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–6795 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 558
New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal
Feeds
CFR Correction
In title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 558, revised as of
April 1, 2008, on page 410, in § 558.58
(e)(1)(iii), the entry for Bambermycins 1
to 3, in the column under ‘‘Limitations’’
remove ‘‘057926’’ and in its place add
‘‘016592’’; in the column under
‘‘Sponsors’’, add ‘‘016592’’.
[FR Doc. E9–6810 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505–01–D
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) Implementation in
the Maritime Sector; Hazardous
Materials Endorsement for a
Commercial Driver’s License
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) through the United
States Coast Guard (Coast Guard) issues
this final rule to amend one provision
of its previously issued final rule.
Specifically, the Coast Guard is
amending its definition of secure area to
take into account facilities in American
Samoa, whose workers are not required
to be authorized to work in the United
States under U.S. immigration law when
working in American Samoa.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of dockets TSA–2006–24191 and
USCG–2006–24196, and are available
for inspection or copying at the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find this docket on the Internet by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
TSA–2006–24191 or USCG–2006–24196
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter,
and then clicking on the item in the
Docket ID column.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
LCDR Jonathan Maiorine, Coast Guard;
telephone 1–877–687–2243. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory History
On May 22, 2006, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), through the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard)
and the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), published a joint
notice of proposed rulemaking entitled
‘‘Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC) Implementation in
the Maritime Sector; Hazardous
Materials Endorsement for a
Commercial Driver’s License’’ in the
Federal Register (71 FR 29396). This
was followed by a 45-day comment
period and four public meetings. The
Coast Guard and TSA issued a joint
final rule, under the same title, on
January 25, 2007 (72 FR 3492)
(hereinafter referred to as the original
TWIC final rule). The preamble to that
final rule contains a discussion of the
provisions found in the original TWIC
final rule, which became effective on
March 26, 2007.
On September 28, 2007, the Coast
Guard and TSA issued a joint final rule
(72 FR 55043) that, among other things,
revised the definition for ‘‘secure area’’
to account for facilities in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (the CNMI), as non-citizen
workers at those facilities are not
required to have authorization to work
in the United States under U.S.
immigration law before being allowed to
work.
On May 7, 2008, the Coast Guard and
TSA issued a joint final rule to realign
the compliance date for implementation
of the original TWIC final rule (see 73
FR 25562). The date by which mariners
need to obtain a TWIC, and by which
owners and operators of vessels and
outer continental shelf facilities must
implement access control procedures
using TWIC, is April 15, 2009. Owners
and operators of facilities that must
comply with 33 CFR part 105 are subject
to earlier, rolling compliance dates, as
set forth in 33 CFR 105.115(e). The
Coast Guard announced these rolling
compliance dates via notices published
in the Federal Register. The final
compliance date for all COTP Zones is
not later than April 15, 2009.
On September 30, 2008, the Coast
Guard announced the compliance date
for COTP Zone Honolulu would be
February 12, 2009 (73 FR 56730). On
February 12, 2009, the Coast Guard
announced the extension of that
compliance date, for the territory of
American Samoa only, to April 14,
2009, due to the fact that a large
percentage of the maritime workforce is
not native to the island, and does not
need to be authorized to work in the
United States under U.S. immigration
law before being allowed to work in
American Samoa. In that notice, the
Coast Guard stated that the extension
was being granted in order to allow time
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
for the Coast Guard to consult with
TSA, DHS, and the Department of State,
to determine whether there is an
equivalent visa category that these
workers could use to qualify for a TWIC,
or whether the TWIC requirement for
facilities located in American Samoa
should be reconsidered. This final rule
is the result of those deliberations.
II. Background and Purpose
A complete discussion of the
background and purpose of the original
TWIC final rule may be found beginning
at 72 FR 3494. This final rule is being
issued in order to make an amendment
to the original TWIC final rule that is
necessary to address the fact that noncitizen workers on the island of
American Samoa do not meet the
immigration eligibility standards to
obtain a TWIC, but make up
approximately 87% of the maritime
workers that would otherwise need a
TWIC.
As in the case of the CNMI, while
American Samoa is part of the United
States, it is not currently included in the
definition of ‘‘United States’’ for
purposes of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 110(a)(38))
(Title VII of the Consolidated Natural
Resources Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110–229,
will change this situation later this year
with respect to the CNMI only by
bringing the CNMI within U.S.
immigration law). Therefore, the work
authorization of aliens in American
Samoa is a matter of territorial law only,
and the U.S. immigration statuses
relevant to TWIC eligibility
determinations in U.S. jurisdictions
subject to the Immigration and
Nationality Act do not apply there.
III. Discussion of Change
On September 28, 2007, the Coast
Guard and TSA issued a joint final rule
(72 FR 55043) that, among other
provisions, revised the definition for
‘‘secure area’’ to account for facilities in
the CNMI, as workers at those facilities
are not required to have authorization to
work in the United States under U.S.
immigration law before being allowed to
work in the CNMI.
Similar to the CNMI joint final rule,
this final rule amends the definition of
‘‘secure area’’ in 33 CFR 101.105, to
state that facilities otherwise subject to
33 CFR part 105 located in the territory
of American Samoa do not have secure
areas for the purposes of the TWIC
regulations. This action means that only
the facility security officer and facility
personnel whose primary employment
responsibility is security will be
required to obtain a TWIC, per 33 CFR
105.205 and 105.210, respectively.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Note that these facilities must
continue to implement their previously
approved facility security plans, which
include provisions for maintaining
access control. Vessels coming from
American Samoa to any other port in
the United States must continue to go
through the same port state control
screening required of a vessel coming
from a foreign country. Additionally,
workers provided unescorted access to
facilities in American Samoa would not
be eligible for unescorted access to any
other part 105 facility outside of
American Samoa, nor would they be
eligible for unescorted access to any part
104 vessel, unless issued a TWIC.
The rule also takes the opportunity to
correct a typographical error in the
definition of ‘‘secure area’’ that resulted
in an incorrect name of a U.S. territory,
by changing ‘‘the Commonwealth of
Northern Mariana Islands’’ to ‘‘the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands’’.
IV. Regulatory Requirements
The Coast Guard has not published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
for this final rule. Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing an
NPRM, because providing opportunity
for public comment would be contrary
to the public interest. The amendment
in this final rule eases a requirement, by
removing it completely for an entire
class of individuals. This serves the
public interest by ensuring that after
April 14, 2009, maritime businesses in
the territory of American Samoa are able
to continue operating without
significantly impacting the security risk
to the port area. Without this
amendment, these businesses would be
forced to escort the vast majority of their
personnel in secure areas, because 87%
of the maritime workforce who would
require a TWIC (without this
amendment) cannot qualify for one.
This would be unduly disruptive to
commerce in American Samoa and is
therefore contrary to the public interest.
For the same reasons, and because
this change is required before the April
14, 2009, TWIC compliance date, under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making this
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13115
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We expect the economic impact
of this rule to be minimal; therefore a
full economic evaluation is
unnecessary.
This final rule effectively removes the
TWIC requirement for the majority of
workers at facilities located in the
territory of American Samoa, thus
lessening the costs of the regulatory
action for the owners of these facilities,
and removing it entirely for those
workers who will no longer be required
to purchase a TWIC.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
For the reasons stated above, we
expect this final rule to reduce TWICrelated compliance costs, particularly
with respect to the costs of providing
escorted access to secure areas, for
facilities located in American Samoa.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this final rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
13116
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
concerning the training, qualifying,
licensing, and disciplining of maritime
personnel. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Harbors, Maritime security, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Security measures, Vessels, Waterways.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(c) of the Instruction.
This rule involves regulations
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 101
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 101 as follows:
■
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable
Waters
CHAPTER I—COAST GUARD
PART 101—MARITIME SECURITY:
GENERAL
1. The authority citation for part 101
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 192; Executive
Order 12656, 3 CFR 1988 Comp., p. 585; 33
CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
§ 101.105
[Amended]
2. In § 101.105, in the definition for
‘‘secure area’’, remove the words
‘‘Commonwealth of Northern Mariana
Islands’’ and add, in their place, the
words ‘‘Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands and American Samoa’’.
■
Dated: March 19, 2009.
Brian M. Salerno,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant
Commandant for Marine Safety, Security, and
Stewardship.
[FR Doc. E9–6833 Filed 3–24–09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2008–0069]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway (Algiers
Alternate Route), Belle Chasse, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the SR 23
bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13114-13116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6833]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 101
[Docket Nos. TSA-2006-24191; USCG-2006-24196]
RIN 1652-AA41
Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
Implementation in the Maritime Sector; Hazardous Materials Endorsement
for a Commercial Driver's License
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through the United
States Coast Guard (Coast Guard) issues this final rule to amend one
provision of its previously issued final rule. Specifically, the Coast
Guard is amending its definition of secure area to take into account
facilities in American Samoa, whose workers are not required to be
authorized to work in the United States under U.S. immigration law when
working in American Samoa.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of dockets TSA-2006-24191 and USCG-2006-24196, and are
available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option
on the right side of the screen, inserting TSA-2006-24191 or USCG-2006-
24196 in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call LCDR Jonathan Maiorine, Coast Guard; telephone 1-877-687-2243. If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Regulatory History
On May 22, 2006, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), through
the United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard) and the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA), published a joint notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ``Transportation Worker Identification Credential
(TWIC) Implementation in the Maritime Sector; Hazardous Materials
Endorsement for a Commercial Driver's License'' in the Federal Register
(71 FR 29396). This was followed by a 45-day comment period and four
public meetings. The Coast Guard and TSA issued a joint final rule,
under the same title, on January 25, 2007 (72 FR 3492) (hereinafter
referred to as the original TWIC final rule). The preamble to that
final rule contains a discussion of the provisions found in the
original TWIC final rule, which became effective on March 26, 2007.
On September 28, 2007, the Coast Guard and TSA issued a joint final
rule (72 FR 55043) that, among other things, revised the definition for
``secure area'' to account for facilities in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), as non-citizen workers at those
facilities are not required to have authorization to work in the United
States under U.S. immigration law before being allowed to work.
On May 7, 2008, the Coast Guard and TSA issued a joint final rule
to realign the compliance date for implementation of the original TWIC
final rule (see 73 FR 25562). The date by which mariners need to obtain
a TWIC, and by which owners and operators of vessels and outer
continental shelf facilities must implement access control procedures
using TWIC, is April 15, 2009. Owners and operators of facilities that
must comply with 33 CFR part 105 are subject to earlier, rolling
compliance dates, as set forth in 33 CFR 105.115(e). The Coast Guard
announced these rolling compliance dates via notices published in the
Federal Register. The final compliance date for all COTP Zones is not
later than April 15, 2009.
On September 30, 2008, the Coast Guard announced the compliance
date for COTP Zone Honolulu would be February 12, 2009 (73 FR 56730).
On February 12, 2009, the Coast Guard announced the extension of that
compliance date, for the territory of American Samoa only, to April 14,
2009, due to the fact that a large percentage of the maritime workforce
is not native to the island, and does not need to be authorized to work
in the United States under U.S. immigration law before being allowed to
work in American Samoa. In that notice, the Coast Guard stated that the
extension was being granted in order to allow time
[[Page 13115]]
for the Coast Guard to consult with TSA, DHS, and the Department of
State, to determine whether there is an equivalent visa category that
these workers could use to qualify for a TWIC, or whether the TWIC
requirement for facilities located in American Samoa should be
reconsidered. This final rule is the result of those deliberations.
II. Background and Purpose
A complete discussion of the background and purpose of the original
TWIC final rule may be found beginning at 72 FR 3494. This final rule
is being issued in order to make an amendment to the original TWIC
final rule that is necessary to address the fact that non-citizen
workers on the island of American Samoa do not meet the immigration
eligibility standards to obtain a TWIC, but make up approximately 87%
of the maritime workers that would otherwise need a TWIC.
As in the case of the CNMI, while American Samoa is part of the
United States, it is not currently included in the definition of
``United States'' for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act
(8 U.S.C. 110(a)(38)) (Title VII of the Consolidated Natural Resources
Act of 2008, Pub. L. 110-229, will change this situation later this
year with respect to the CNMI only by bringing the CNMI within U.S.
immigration law). Therefore, the work authorization of aliens in
American Samoa is a matter of territorial law only, and the U.S.
immigration statuses relevant to TWIC eligibility determinations in
U.S. jurisdictions subject to the Immigration and Nationality Act do
not apply there.
III. Discussion of Change
On September 28, 2007, the Coast Guard and TSA issued a joint final
rule (72 FR 55043) that, among other provisions, revised the definition
for ``secure area'' to account for facilities in the CNMI, as workers
at those facilities are not required to have authorization to work in
the United States under U.S. immigration law before being allowed to
work in the CNMI.
Similar to the CNMI joint final rule, this final rule amends the
definition of ``secure area'' in 33 CFR 101.105, to state that
facilities otherwise subject to 33 CFR part 105 located in the
territory of American Samoa do not have secure areas for the purposes
of the TWIC regulations. This action means that only the facility
security officer and facility personnel whose primary employment
responsibility is security will be required to obtain a TWIC, per 33
CFR 105.205 and 105.210, respectively.
Note that these facilities must continue to implement their
previously approved facility security plans, which include provisions
for maintaining access control. Vessels coming from American Samoa to
any other port in the United States must continue to go through the
same port state control screening required of a vessel coming from a
foreign country. Additionally, workers provided unescorted access to
facilities in American Samoa would not be eligible for unescorted
access to any other part 105 facility outside of American Samoa, nor
would they be eligible for unescorted access to any part 104 vessel,
unless issued a TWIC.
The rule also takes the opportunity to correct a typographical
error in the definition of ``secure area'' that resulted in an
incorrect name of a U.S. territory, by changing ``the Commonwealth of
Northern Mariana Islands'' to ``the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands''.
IV. Regulatory Requirements
The Coast Guard has not published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) for this final rule. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM, because
providing opportunity for public comment would be contrary to the
public interest. The amendment in this final rule eases a requirement,
by removing it completely for an entire class of individuals. This
serves the public interest by ensuring that after April 14, 2009,
maritime businesses in the territory of American Samoa are able to
continue operating without significantly impacting the security risk to
the port area. Without this amendment, these businesses would be forced
to escort the vast majority of their personnel in secure areas, because
87% of the maritime workforce who would require a TWIC (without this
amendment) cannot qualify for one. This would be unduly disruptive to
commerce in American Samoa and is therefore contrary to the public
interest.
For the same reasons, and because this change is required before
the April 14, 2009, TWIC compliance date, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. We expect the economic impact of this
rule to be minimal; therefore a full economic evaluation is
unnecessary.
This final rule effectively removes the TWIC requirement for the
majority of workers at facilities located in the territory of American
Samoa, thus lessening the costs of the regulatory action for the owners
of these facilities, and removing it entirely for those workers who
will no longer be required to purchase a TWIC.
B. Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
For the reasons stated above, we expect this final rule to reduce
TWIC-related compliance costs, particularly with respect to the costs
of providing escorted access to secure areas, for facilities located in
American Samoa. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
C. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The
[[Page 13116]]
Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's
responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
D. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
E. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
G. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
H. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
I. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
J. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
K. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
L. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically excluded under section 2.B.2,
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(c) of the Instruction. This rule involves
regulations concerning the training, qualifying, licensing, and
disciplining of maritime personnel. An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 101
Harbors, Maritime security, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Vessels, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 101 as follows:
Title 33--Navigation and Navigable Waters
CHAPTER I--COAST GUARD
PART 101--MARITIME SECURITY: GENERAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 101 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 192; Executive Order 12656, 3 CFR 1988 Comp., p. 585; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-11, 6.14, 6.16, and 6.19; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 101.105 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 101.105, in the definition for ``secure area'', remove the
words ``Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands'' and add, in their
place, the words ``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and
American Samoa''.
Dated: March 19, 2009.
Brian M. Salerno,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety,
Security, and Stewardship.
[FR Doc. E9-6833 Filed 3-24-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P