Operations in Controlled Airspace Designated for an Airport, 13098-13099 [E9-6731]
Download as PDF
13098
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
2009–06–16 Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (Embraer):
Amendment 39–15853. Docket No.
FAA–2008–0831; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–051–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective April 30, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model
ERJ 170–100 LR, –100 SE, –100 STD, –100
SU, –200 LR, –200 STD, and –200 SU
airplanes; and Model ERJ 190–100 IGW, –100
LR, –100 STD, –100 ECJ, –200 IGW, –200 LR,
and –200 STD airplanes; certificated in any
category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 24: Electrical power.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
It has been found the occurrence of failed
bearings of the RAT [ram air turbine]
generator, which may lead to a RAT
generator failure. The RAT generator was
designed to provide emergency electrical
power to essential systems in case of loss of
all other sources of aircraft AC electrical
power.
Loss of emergency electrical power could
result in reduced controllability of the
airplane during in-flight emergencies. The
corrective actions include determining the
part number (P/N) and serial number (S/N)
of the RAT, and re-identifying or replacing
the RAT if necessary.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 1,300 flight hours or 6 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first, determine the P/N and S/N of
the RAT. For airplanes on which a RAT
having P/N 1703781 is installed, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as applicable, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin
170–24–0041, Revision 01, dated August 28,
2007; or 190–24–0012, Revision 01, dated
August 21, 2007; as applicable.
(i) For airplanes on which the S/N on the
RAT is 0110, 0150, 0255, or 0354 through
0419: Before further flight, re-identify RAT P/
N 1703781 to P/N 1703781A.
(ii) For airplanes on which the S/N on the
RAT is 0005, 0101 through 0109, 0111
through 0149, 0151 through 0254, or 0256
through 0353: Within 6,000 flight hours or 26
months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, replace the affected
RAT with a serviceable RAT.
(2) Previous accomplishment of the reidentification or replacement of the RAT
before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with EMBRAER Service Bulletin
170–24–0041 or 190–24–0012, both dated
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
May 4, 2007, meets the requirements of
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
difference.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Brazilian Airworthiness
Directives 2007–12–01 and 2007–12–02, both
effective January 24, 2008, and EMBRAER
Service Bulletins 170–24–0041, Revision 01,
dated August 28, 2007; and 190–24–0012,
Revision 01, dated August 21, 2007; for
related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(i) You must use EMBRAER Service
Bulletin 170–24–0041, Revision 01, dated
August 28, 2007; or EMBRAER Service
Bulletin 190–24–0012, Revision 01, dated
August 21, 2007; as applicable; to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Empresa Brasileira de
Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro
˜
Faria Lima, 2170—Putim—12227–901 Sao
Jose dos Campos—SP—BRASIL; telephone:
+55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732; fax:
+55 12 3927–7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://
www.flyembraer.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_
locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on March
10, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–6565 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 137
Operations in Controlled Airspace
Designated for an Airport
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
SUMMARY: This final rule revises an
incorrect cross-reference in the
regulations regarding operations in
controlled airspace designated for an
airport. The current regulations crossreference a particular paragraph that no
longer exists. This final rule updates the
cross-reference so that the reader will be
able to find the appropriate weather
minimum limitations on visual flight
rules for aircraft in controlled airspace
near airports.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective March 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl
N. Johnson, Flight Standards Office,
AFS–820, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 493–5351; e-mail
carl.n.johnson@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 17, 1991 (56 FR 65664),
an amendment created § 137.43,
Operations in controlled airspace
designated for an airport. Paragraph (c)
of this section contains a reference to
paragraph (a)(2) of § 91.157, Special
VFR weather minimums. The purpose
of the cross-reference is to set out the
exceptions for aircraft operating under
special visual flight rules (VFR) in
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
26MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 57 / Thursday, March 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
controlled airspace designated for
airports. However, a final rule published
on December 5, 1995 (58 FR 51968)
revised § 91.157. That revision removed
paragraph (a)(2) and placed the
information in paragraph (b)(4). As a
result, the cross-reference in § 137.43
became inaccurate. This final rule
revises the cross-reference in § 137.43(c)
so that it correctly refers to
§ 91.157(b)(4).
Technical Amendment
This technical amendment merely
revises an out-of-date cross-reference.
There are no other changes to the
existing regulatory text.
Justification for Immediate Adoption
Because this action updates an
inaccurate cross-reference, the FAA
finds that notice and public comment
under 5 U.S.C. section 553(b) is
unnecessary. For the same reason, the
FAA finds good cause exists under 5
U.S.C. section 553(d) for making this
rule effective upon publication.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 137
Agriculture, Aircraft, Aviation safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Amendment
In consideration of the forgoing, the
FAA amends 14 CFR part 137 as
follows:
■
PART 137—AGRICULTURAL
AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 137
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
44701–44702.
§ 137.43
[Amended]
2. Amend § 137.43(c) by removing the
reference ‘‘§ 91.157(a)(2)’’ and adding in
its place the reference ‘‘§ 91.157(b)(4)’’.
■
Issued in Washington, DC on March 13,
2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9–6731 Filed 3–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 303
Rules and Regulations Under the
Textile Fiber Products Identification
Act
Federal Trade Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:51 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘FTC’’)
amends Rule 7(c) of the Rules and
Regulations under the Textile Fiber
Products Identification Act (‘‘Textile
Rules’’) to establish a new generic fiber
subclass name and definition within the
existing definition of ‘‘polyester’’ for a
subclass of fibers made from
poly(trimethylene terephthalate)
(‘‘PTT’’). The amendment establishes
the subclass name ‘‘triexta.’’
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janice Podoll Frankle, Attorney,
Division of Enforcement, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Ave.,
N.W., Washington, D.C., 20580; (202)
326-3022.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to a petition filed by Mohawk
Industries, Inc. (‘‘Mohawk’’), E. I. du
Pont de Nemours and Company
(‘‘DuPont’’), and PTT Poly Canada
(‘‘PTT Canada’’) (collectively
‘‘Petitioners’’), the FTC amends Rule
7(c) of the Textile Rules. 16 CFR
§ 303.7(c). The amendment establishes
the subclass name ‘‘triexta’’ as an
alternative to the generic name
‘‘polyester’’ for a specific subclass of
textile fibers defined in the amendment.
In reaching this conclusion, the
following Federal Register document
recounts the procedural history of this
matter and details the record established
by the petition and public comments.
The document then analyzes this record
based on the applicable Commission
standard.
I. Procedural History
On February 21, 2006, Petitioners
asked the Commission to establish a
new generic subclass within the existing
‘‘polyester’’ category for fibers made
from poly(trimethylene terephthalate)
(‘‘PTT’’).1 After initially analyzing the
request with the assistance of a textile
expert, tentatively and without the
benefit of public comment, the
Commission agreed with Petitioners that
PTT fiber satisfied the criteria for
establishing a new generic fiber subclass
name and definition within Rule 7(c)’s
definition of ‘‘polyester.’’2 Accordingly,
1 Mohawk sells a line of carpets manufactured
from PTT under the trademark SmartStrand®.
DuPont markets PTT under the trademark Sorona®.
PTT Canada markets PTT under the trademark
Corterra® Polymers.
2 16 CFR 303.7(c). Rule 7(c) defines ‘‘polyester’’
as ‘‘a manufactured fiber in which the fiber-forming
substance is any long chain synthetic polymer
composed of at least 85% by weight of an ester of
a substituted aromatic carboxylic acid, including
but not restricted to substituted terephthalate units,
and para substituted hydroxy-benzoate units.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13099
on April 18, 2006, the Commission
assigned Petitioners the designation
‘‘PTT001’’ for temporary use in
identifying PTT fiber pending a final
determination on the merits of their
Petition.
On September 7, 2006, Petitioners
submitted a revised petition
(‘‘Petition’’)3 restating the original
request and addressing minor questions
raised by Commission staff.4
On August 24, 2007, the Commission
solicited comment on whether to amend
Rule 7(c) of the Textile Rules to
establish a new generic fiber subclass
name for PTT within the definition of
‘‘polyester’’ for PTT (‘‘2007 Notice’’).5
At the close of the comment period,
November 12, 2007, the Commission
had received 49 comments.6
INVISTA S.r.l. (‘‘Invista’’)7 was the
sole commenter to oppose the Petition.
Its comment, however, raised serious
concerns. Specifically, the comment
criticized Petitioners’ testing procedures
and provided Invista’s own test results
that showed little difference between
PTT and traditional ‘‘polyester’’ fibers
(polyethylene terephthalate (‘‘PET’’)).8
Because the Commission received
Invista’s comment only three days prior
to the close of the 75 day comment
period, Petitioners and other interested
parties had limited opportunity to
review and respond to it.9 Therefore, on
3 The Petition is available in electronic form at:
(https://www.ftc.gov/os/statutes/textile/info/
PTTGenAppRev8-30-06.pdf). The Petition, as well
as any comments filed in this proceeding, are
available for public inspection in accordance with
the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, and
the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 CFR 4.11,
at the Consumer Response Center, Public Reference
Section, Room 130, Federal Trade Commission, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.
4 These questions addressed improving the
legibility of some data and identifying the KruskalWallis test as a statistical analysis rather than a
carpet human traffic test.
5 72 FR 48600 (Aug. 24, 2007).
6 Comments filed in this rulemaking can be found
under the Rules and Regulations Under the Textile
Fiber Products Identification Act, 16 CFR Part 303,
Matter No. P074201, ‘‘Mohawk, DuPont, and PTT
Canada Generic Fiber Petition Rulemaking.’’ The
comments also may be viewed on the Commission’s
website at: (https://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/
textile-mohawk/index.shtm) and (https://
www.ftc.gov/os/comments/textilefibernewgeneric/
index.shtm).
7 In its comment, Invista stated that it is one of
the world’s largest integrated producers of manmade fibers, and the largest producer of nylon fibers
used in the production of both residential and
commercial carpeting. Invista at 1.
8 Invista also argued that Mohawk violated the
Textile Fiber Products Identification Act and
Textile Rules by marketing PTT carpet without
identifying it as ‘‘polyester,’’ and that this failure to
comply should weigh heavily against granting the
Petition. Invista at 7.
9 Prior to the comment period closing, the
Commission did not receive any comments
responding to Invista’s comment. Petitioners
E:\FR\FM\26MRR1.SGM
Continued
26MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 57 (Thursday, March 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13098-13099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 137
Operations in Controlled Airspace Designated for an Airport
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule revises an incorrect cross-reference in the
regulations regarding operations in controlled airspace designated for
an airport. The current regulations cross-reference a particular
paragraph that no longer exists. This final rule updates the cross-
reference so that the reader will be able to find the appropriate
weather minimum limitations on visual flight rules for aircraft in
controlled airspace near airports.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective March 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl N. Johnson, Flight Standards
Office, AFS-820, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 493-5351; e-mail
carl.n.johnson@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 17, 1991 (56 FR 65664), an amendment created Sec.
137.43, Operations in controlled airspace designated for an airport.
Paragraph (c) of this section contains a reference to paragraph (a)(2)
of Sec. 91.157, Special VFR weather minimums. The purpose of the
cross-reference is to set out the exceptions for aircraft operating
under special visual flight rules (VFR) in
[[Page 13099]]
controlled airspace designated for airports. However, a final rule
published on December 5, 1995 (58 FR 51968) revised Sec. 91.157. That
revision removed paragraph (a)(2) and placed the information in
paragraph (b)(4). As a result, the cross-reference in Sec. 137.43
became inaccurate. This final rule revises the cross-reference in Sec.
137.43(c) so that it correctly refers to Sec. 91.157(b)(4).
Technical Amendment
This technical amendment merely revises an out-of-date cross-
reference. There are no other changes to the existing regulatory text.
Justification for Immediate Adoption
Because this action updates an inaccurate cross-reference, the FAA
finds that notice and public comment under 5 U.S.C. section 553(b) is
unnecessary. For the same reason, the FAA finds good cause exists under
5 U.S.C. section 553(d) for making this rule effective upon
publication.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 137
Agriculture, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Amendment
0
In consideration of the forgoing, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 137 as
follows:
PART 137--AGRICULTURAL AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 137 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 44701-44702.
Sec. 137.43 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 137.43(c) by removing the reference ``Sec.
91.157(a)(2)'' and adding in its place the reference ``Sec.
91.157(b)(4)''.
Issued in Washington, DC on March 13, 2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-6731 Filed 3-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P