Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income Persons, 12535-12540 [E9-6628]
Download as PDF
12535
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 56
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 440
[Docket No. EEWAP1201]
RIN 1904–AB84
Weatherization Assistance Program for
Low-Income Persons
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is expanding the
definition of ‘‘State’’ under the
Weatherization Assistance Program for
Low-Income Persons and amending the
financial assistance allocation
procedure to reflect the expanded
definition. The Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 amended the
Weatherization Assistance Program
definition of ‘‘State’’ to include the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
other territories and possessions of the
United States. Consistent with the
statutory amendment, DOE is amending
the regulatory definition of ‘‘State,’’ and
amending the allocation procedure
relied on to calculate the amount of
financial assistance received by each
State so as to include American Samoa,
Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
Further, DOE is amending the
Weatherization Assistance Program
regulations consistent with recent
statutory amendments in the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
25, 2009, and applicable on March 12,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
Diggs, U.S. Department of Energy, Office
of Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, Weatherization Assistance
Program, EE–2K, Room 6070, 1000
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121, (202) 586–
8506, e-mail: jean.diggs@ee.doe.gov, or
Chris Calamita, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
Forrestal Building, GC–72, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–9507,
e-mail:
Christopher.Calamita@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
II. Definition of ‘‘State’’
III. Allocation of Funds
IV. American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009
V. Effective Date
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Congressional Notification
VIII. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Introduction
Sections 411–418 of the Energy
Conservation and Production Act
established the Weatherization
Assistance Program for Low-Income
Persons (Weatherization Assistance
Program). (42 U.S.C. 6861 et seq.) The
Weatherization Assistance Program
reduces energy costs for low-income
households by increasing the energy
efficiency of their homes, while
promoting their health and safety. DOE
works in partnership with State- and
local-level agencies to implement the
Weatherization Assistance Program.
DOE’s Project Management Center
awards grants to State-level agencies,
which then contract with local agencies.
DOE issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NOPR) to amend the
Weatherization Assistance Program
regulations consistent with amendments
to the Energy Conservation and
Production Act under the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
(Pub. L. No. 110–140; December 19,
2007). (73 FR 79414; December 29,
2008) The Energy Independence and
Security Act of 2007 amended the
Weatherization Assistance Program
definition of ‘‘State’’ to include the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the
other territories and possessions of the
United States. Consistent with the
statutory amendment, DOE proposed to
amend the regulatory definition of
‘‘State,’’ and to amend the allocation
procedure relied on to calculate the
amount of financial assistance received
by each State so as to include American
Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the
Virgin Islands.
DOE received one comment in
response to the NOPR, from the
Governor of the Virgin Islands. The
comment was generally supportive of
the rule as proposed. As explained in
the remainder of this notice, DOE is
adopting the NOPR as proposed.
Further, DOE is making additional
amendments to the Weatherization
Assistance Program regulations
consistent with the recent statutory
changes in the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. No.
111–5).
II. Definition of ‘‘State’’
DOE allocates financial assistance for
weatherization to States and Indian
tribes. 10 CFR 440.10 and 440.11.
Section 411(c) of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007
amended section 412 of the Energy
Conservation and Production Act to
include under the definition of ‘‘State,’’
the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and
any other territory or possession of the
United States. (42 U.S.C. 6862(8)) In the
NOPR, DOE proposed to amend the
regulatory definition of ‘‘State’’ under
the Weatherization Program consistent
with the statutory definition. As
proposed the definition of ‘‘State’’
would include American Samoa, Guam,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands (hereafter
collectively referred to as the U.S.
territories).
The amended statutory definition of
‘‘State’’ includes territories or
possessions of the United States
generally, which would indicate that the
territories of Palmyra Atoll and Wake
Atoll would also be included. However,
as explained in the NOPR, the territories
of Palmyra Atoll and Wake Atoll do not
have significant permanent populations
to warrant inclusion in the
Weatherization Program. Palmyra Atoll
is a national Wildlife Refuge and access
to Wake Atoll is restricted. (See,
https://www.doi.gov/oia/Firstpginfo/
islandfactsheet.htm, last visited
September 30, 2008.) The purpose of the
Weatherization Assistance Program is to
provide grants ‘‘for the purpose of
providing financial assistance with
regard to projects designed to provide
for the weatherization of dwelling units,
particularly those where elderly or
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
12536
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
handicapped low-income persons
reside, occupied by low-income
families.’’ (42 U.S.C. 6863(a)) Further
DOE must ‘‘allocate financial assistance
to each State on the basis of the relative
need for weatherization assistance
among low-income persons throughout
the States[.]’’ (42 U.S.C. 6864) The
absence of permanent populations on
Palmyra Atoll and Wake Atoll would
make the inclusion of these Atolls
superfluous. As such DOE did not
propose to include the territories of
Palmyra Atoll and Wake Atoll in the
regulatory definition of State for the
purpose of the Weatherization
Assistance Program.
The comment from the Governor of
the Virgin Islands supported inclusion
of the U.S. territories in the definition
of ‘‘State,’’ and urged DOE to finalize
the revised definition in advance of
distributing funds made available under
the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009.
DOE has concluded that the rationale
for the proposed definition remains
valid. Therefore, DOE is amending the
definition of ‘‘State,’’ as proposed, to
mean each of the States, the District of
Columbia, American Samoa, Guam,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands.
III. Allocation of Funds
Each year Congress appropriates
funds to implement the Weatherization
Assistance Program. A portion of the
appropriated funds is used for training
and technical assistance. The remaining
funds, comprising the majority of the
appropriated funds, are distributed to
the States as program funds based on a
two-part allocation.
From the total appropriation, DOE
reserves funds for national training and
technical assistance (T&TA) activities
that benefit all States. In addition, DOE
specifically allocates funding to States
for T&TA activities at both the State and
local levels. Prior to the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009,
the total funds for national, State, and
local T&TA could not exceed 10 percent
of the Congressional appropriation.
Section 407 of the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 increased
the percent of funds eligible for T&TA
to up to 20 percent. (42 U.S.C. 6866)
The remaining funds comprise the State
program allocations.
If the State program allocations in a
fiscal year (FY) are at or above the
amount allocated to States in FY 1994
under Public Law No. 103–332
(September 30, 1994) (i.e., the funds
made available to the Weatherization
Assistance Program minus funds for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
T&TA, which equaled $209,724,761) the
State program allocations are distributed
according to a two-part allocation
procedure. Should total funds for State
program allocation fall below
$209,724,761, the allocations to States
are reduced proportionally. See 10 CFR
440.10(c).
The two-part allocation is comprised
of a base allocation plus a formula
allocation. See 10 CFR 440.10(b). The
base allocation for each State is fixed,
but differs for each State and was
derived from each State’s allocation
under the appropriations for FY 1993.1
The base allocation was developed to
minimize fluctuations in funds received
by States between fiscal years resulting
from changes in the total amount of
appropriated funds received for the
Weatherization Assistance Program. The
base allocation was established in
response to concern that substantial
fluctuation between annual funds could
disrupt a State’s program.
Under the two-part allocation, funds
in excess of the total base allocation are
allocated among States according to the
formula allocation set forth in 10 CFR
440.10(b)(3). A State’s formula
allocation is based on three factors for
each State. Factor 1, Low-Income
Population, represents the share of the
nation’s low-income households in each
State expressed as a percentage of all
U.S. low-income households. Factor 2,
Climatic Conditions, is obtained from
the heating and cooling degrees for each
State, treating the energy needed for
heating and cooling proportionately.
Factor 3, Residential Energy
Expenditures by Low-Income
Households in each State, is an
approximation of the financial burden
that energy use places on low-income
households. The approximation is
necessary because State-specific data on
residential energy expenditures by lowincome households is generally lacking.
In the NOPR, DOE proposed to revise
how funds are allocated under the
Weatherization Assistance Program so
as to include the U.S. territories. The
proposed revisions were based on a
method for determining the base and
formula allocation for the U.S.
territories that was consistent with how
the current allocation method for States
was developed.
Essentially, the Department followed
the development process used in 1995
to establish the existing allocation
method (i.e., basing the allocation
formula on FY 1994 allocation) under
1 Calculation of each State’s share of the funds
was based on a formula different from that in the
current regulations. See, 60 FR 4480, 4482; January
23, 1995.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the assumption that at that time the U.S.
territories were included in the
Weatherization Assistance Program.
DOE recognized that the data used to
calculate a State’s share of the funds
under the 1995 rulemaking are not
available for the U.S. territories.
Therefore, DOE proposed to use
Hawaii’s information for the U.S.
territories. Similar to Hawaii, the U.S.
territories are in hot climates with
virtually no heating load, are all islands,
and share a common main fuel type
used in low-income households,
electricity.
A. Allocation Threshold
As discussed in the previous
paragraphs, the allocation of funding
under the Weatherization Assistance
Program is dependent first upon
whether the total funds available for
allocation to the States (excluding funds
for T&TA) are at or above the level made
available under Public Law No. 103–
322, i.e., $209,724,761. In order to make
the regulations clearer, the Department
is replacing the references in 10 CFR
part 440 to the ‘‘total program
allocations under Public Law No. 103–
322’’ with the actual dollar value. This
amendment does not impact the
allocation process, and is solely for the
purpose of making the current
regulation easier to read and
understand.
B. Base Allocation
To reflect the addition of the U.S.
territories to the Weatherization
Assistance Program, DOE is revising the
base allocation to include the newly
added jurisdictions, as proposed. As
discussed previously, DOE relied on
Hawaii’s base allocation ($120,000) as
the base allocation for the U.S.
territories. This revision does not reduce
the base allocation amount for any State,
but instead increases the total base
allocation value so as to include the
U.S. territories.
The comment from the Governor of
the Virgin Islands supported the use of
data from Hawaii, although indicated
that such data could be made available
for the Virgin Islands. However, such
data was not provided as part of the
comment.
For the reasons expressed in the
NOPR and in this Final Rule, DOE is
adopting the Base Allocation as
proposed.
C. Formula Allocation
In addition to a base allocation, DOE
will now allocate weatherization funds
to the U.S. territories through the
formula allocation. Essentially, the
weatherization funds will be based on
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
the U.S. territories’ (1) Number of lowincome households (10 CFR
440.10(b)(3)(i)), (2) number of ‘‘heating
degree’’ and ‘‘cooling degree’’ days (10
CFR 440.10(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)), and (3)
average residential household energy
expenditures (10 CFR 440.10(b)(3)(v)).
DOE recognizes that data for the third
factor of the formula allocation, i.e.,
average residential household energy
expenditures, may not be available for
all the U.S. territories. In the instances
in which DOE does not have such data,
DOE will again rely on comparable data
from a comparable State, i.e., Hawaii, as
proposed. This approach does not
require revisions to the regulatory text
for the formula allocation.
IV. American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
Section 407 of the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 amended
several of the Weatherization Assistance
Program provisions in the Energy
Conservation and Production Act. The
amendments under section 407—
• Increased the referenced percentage
of the poverty level in the definition of
‘‘low income’’ from 150 percent to 200
percent (42 U.S.C. 6862(7));
• Increased the limit on the minimum
average expenditure per dwelling unit
from $2,500 to $6,500 (42 U.S.C.
6865(c)(1));
• Increased the maximum amount of
appropriated funds that the Department
may apply towards T&TA from 10
percent of the appropriated sums to 20
percent (42 U.S.C. 6866); and
• Extended eligibility for further
financial assistance to dwelling units
that had been partially weatherized
under a Federal program from
September 30, 1975, through September
30, 1994.
The first three of these amendments
under section 407 of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
require updates to the Weatherization
Assistance Program regulations. Today’s
final rule amends the regulations
consistent with these changes. The time
period for previously received financial
assistance as it relates to dwelling
eligibility is governed by the statute and
is not reflected in regulation, and as
such there is no existing regulation to
update.
DOE finds that there is good cause to
amend the Weatherization Assistance
Program regulations consistent with the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 without providing an
opportunity for notice and comment as
such procedures are unnecessary. DOE
is establishing the maximum percent of
poverty level referenced in the
definition of ‘‘low income,’’ the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
12537
maximum permitted expenditure per
dwelling, or the maximum percent of
funds permitted to be used for T&TA in
accordance with the specific provisions
of the statute. DOE is exercising no
discretion in codifying these provisions
and does not have the authority to
amend the specific aspects of these
provisions. Thus, no useful purpose
would be served by offering an
opportunity for public comment.
Congressional direction to commence
expenditures as quickly as possible, and
thereby unnecessary, impracticable, and
contrary to public interest. For the
reasons stated above, DOE finds good
cause, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), to
waive the 30-day delay in effective date
required by the rulemaking provisions
of the Administrative Procedures Act.
V. Effective Date
A. Review under Executive Order 12866
Today’s final rule is effective on
March 25, 2009. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Department finds good
cause that the effective date of this final
rule need not be delayed. In the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 Congress appropriated $5
billion for the Weatherization
Assistance Program. The stated
purposes of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 are—
(1) To preserve and create jobs and
promote economic recovery.
(2) To assist those most impacted by
the recession.
(3) To provide investments needed to
increase economic efficiency by
spurring technological advances in
science and health.
(4) To invest in transportation,
environmental protection, and other
infrastructure that will provide longterm economic benefits.
(5) To stabilize State and local
government budgets, in order to
minimize and avoid reductions in
essential services and
counterproductive state and local tax
increases. (Section 3(a), Pub. L. No. 11–
5) Moreover, Congress directed the
agencies to manage and expend the
funds made available so as to achieve
the specified purposes, including
commencing expenditures and activities
as quickly as possible consistent with
prudent management. (Section 3(b),
Pub. L. No. 11–5) A delay in the
effective date of today’s final rule would
delay the allocation of weatherization
assistance funds to the States including
the U.S. territories.2 DOE believes it
would be contrary to the public interest
to delay the allocation of weatherization
funds made available under the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009. Thus, a delay to the final
rule would be inconsistent with the
Today’s final rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f)(1) of
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735;
October 4, 1993). Accordingly, today’s
action was not subject to review by the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
2 The comment from the Governor of the Virgin
Islands encouraged DOE to apply the amended
definition and allocation formula to funds made
available under the Consolidated Security, Disaster
Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act,
2009 (Pub. L. No. 110–329; September 30, 2008).
Today’s final rule will apply to fund allocation
determinations made following the issuance date of
today’s final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VI. Regulatory Analysis
B. Review under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires the
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis for any rule that by
law must be proposed for public
comment, unless the agency certifies
that the rule, if promulgated, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272,
‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking,’’ (67 FR 53461;
August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process (68 FR 7990). DOE
has made its procedures and policies
available on the Office of General
Counsel’s Web site: https://
www.gc.doe.gov.
DOE has reviewed today’s final rule
for the Weatherization Assistance
Program under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. Today’s final
rule incorporates statutory changes
made to the Weatherization Assistance
Program. The amendments include the
U.S. territories in the Weatherization
Assistance Program to the same extent
as States are currently included. This
rule will directly affect States and
individual recipients of assistance. It
will not have an economic impact on
small entities. On this basis, DOE
certifies that today’s final rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
12538
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
C. Review Under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE has determined that today’s final
rule is covered under the Categorical
Exclusion found in DOE’s National
Environmental Policy Act regulations at
paragraph A.6. of Appendix A to
subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021. That
Categorical Exclusion applies to
rulemakings that are strictly procedural,
such as rulemaking establishing the
administration of grants. Today’s final
rule establishes the procedure for
allocating funds under the
Weatherization Assistance Program so
as to cover, in addition to the States and
the District of Columbia, the U.S.
territories. The regulations will not have
any independent environmental impact.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement.
D. Review Under Executive Order
13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255
(August 4, 1999), imposes certain
requirements on agencies formulating
and implementing policies or
regulations that pre-empt State law or
that have federalism implications.
Agencies are required to examine the
constitutional and statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States and carefully assess the necessity
for such actions. DOE has examined
today’s final rule and has determined
that it will not pre-empt State law and
will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order
13132.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996),
imposes on Executive agencies the
general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and
(3) provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard and promote simplification
and burden reduction. The review
required by sections 3(a) and 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the pre-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
emptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is
unreasonable to meet one or more of
them.
DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, today’s final
rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
F. Review Under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine
closely the impacts of regulatory actions
on State, local, and tribal governments.
Subsection 101(5) of Title I of that law
defines a Federal intergovernmental
mandate to include any regulation that
would impose upon State, local, or
tribal governments an enforceable duty,
except a condition of Federal assistance
or a duty arising from participating in a
voluntary Federal program. Title II of
that law requires each Federal agency to
assess the effects of Federal regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, other than to the extent
such actions merely incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in a
statute. Section 202 of that title requires
a Federal agency to perform a detailed
assessment of the anticipated costs and
benefits of any rule that includes a
Federal mandate which may result in
costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Section 204 of
that title requires each agency that
proposes a rule containing a significant
Federal intergovernmental mandate to
develop an effective process for
obtaining meaningful and timely input
from elected officers of State, local, and
tribal governments.
Today’s final rule will not impose a
Federal mandate on State, local or tribal
governments, and it will not result in
the expenditure by State, local, and
tribal governments in the aggregate, or
by the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. Accordingly, no
assessment or analysis is required under
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
G. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being.
Today’s final rule will not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
H. Review Under the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act of 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note)
provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the
public under guidelines established by
each agency pursuant to general
guidelines issued by OMB. OMB’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
8452 (February 22, 2002), and DOE’s
guidelines were published at 67 FR
62446 (October 7, 2002). DOE has
reviewed today’s final rule under the
OMB and DOE guidelines and has
concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the OMB a
Statement of Energy Effects for any
proposed significant energy action. A
‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined as
any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy, or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) as a significant energy
action. For any proposed significant
energy action, the agency must give a
detailed statement of any adverse effects
on energy supply, distribution, or use,
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Today’s regulatory action will not
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy
and is therefore not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175. ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249; November
9, 2000), requires DOE to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ refers to regulations that
have ‘‘substantial direct effects on one
or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ Today’s
regulatory action is not a policy that has
‘‘tribal implications’’ under Executive
Order 13175.
Under the Weatherization Assistance
Program, a tribal organization may
qualify as a unit of general purpose local
government and, therefore, be eligible to
apply for funds. See 10 CFR 440.11.
Today’s regulatory action will not
change the eligibility of Indian tribes to
apply for or receive funds under the
Weatherization Assistance Program.
Today’s regulatory action will include
the U.S. territories in the allocation of
available funds. DOE has reviewed
today’s final rule under Executive Order
13175 and has determined that it is
consistent with applicable policies of
that Executive Order.
VII. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of this rule prior to its effective date.
The report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VIII. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 440
Administrative practice and
procedure, Energy conservation, Grant
programs—energy, Grant programs—
housing and community development,
Housing standards, Indians, Individuals
with disabilities, Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Weatherization.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 12,
2009.
Steve Chalk,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy.
§ 440.10
*
1. The authority citation for Part 440
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6861 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
7101 et seq.
2. Section 440.3 is amended by
revising the definitions of ‘‘low income’’
and ‘‘State’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 440.3
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Low Income means that income in
relation to family size which:
(1) At or below 200 percent of the
poverty level determined in accordance
with criteria established by the Director
of the Office of Management and
Budget, except that the Secretary may
establish a higher level if the Secretary,
after consulting with the Secretary of
Agriculture and the Secretary of Health
and Human Services, determines that
such a higher level is necessary to carry
out the purposes of this part and is
consistent with the eligibility criteria
established for the weatherization
program under Section 222(a)(12) of the
Economic Opportunity Act of 1964;
(2) Is the basis on which cash
assistance payments have been paid
during the preceding twelve monthperiod under Titles IV and XVI of the
Social Security Act or applicable State
or local law; or
(3) If a State elects, is the basis for
eligibility for assistance under the Low
Income Home Energy Assistance Act of
1981, provided that such basis is at least
200 percent of the poverty level
determined in accordance with criteria
established by the Director of the Office
of Management and Budget.
*
*
*
*
*
State means each of the States, the
District of Columbia, American Samoa,
Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 440.10 is amended by:
■ a. Removing the phrase ‘‘total program
allocations under Pub. L. 103–332’’ in
paragraph (b) introductory text and
adding in its place ‘‘$209,724,761’’;
■ b. Revising Table 1 in paragraph (b)(1)
and paragraph (c) to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
BASE ALLOCATION TABLE
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, DOE amends part 440 of
chapter II of title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations, to read as follows:
■
Allocation of funds.
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
■
PART 440—WEATHERIZATION
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR LOWINCOME PERSONS
12539
State
Alabama ................................
Alaska ...................................
Arizona ..................................
Arkansas ...............................
California ...............................
Colorado ...............................
Connecticut ...........................
Delaware ...............................
District of Columbia ..............
Florida ...................................
Georgia .................................
Hawaii ...................................
Idaho .....................................
Illinois ....................................
Indiana ..................................
Iowa ......................................
Kansas ..................................
Kentucky ...............................
Louisiana ..............................
Maine ....................................
Maryland ...............................
Massachusetts ......................
Michigan ...............................
Minnesota .............................
Mississippi ............................
Missouri ................................
Montana ................................
Nebraska ..............................
Nevada .................................
New Hampshire ....................
New Jersey ...........................
New Mexico ..........................
New York ..............................
North Carolina ......................
North Dakota ........................
Ohio ......................................
Oklahoma .............................
Oregon ..................................
Pennsylvania ........................
Rhode Island ........................
South Carolina ......................
South Dakota ........................
Tennessee ............................
Texas ....................................
Utah ......................................
Vermont ................................
Virginia ..................................
Washington ...........................
West Virginia ........................
Wisconsin .............................
Wyoming ...............................
American Samoa ..................
Guam ....................................
Puerto Rico ...........................
Northern Mariana Islands .....
Virgin Islands ........................
Total ......................................
*
Base
allocation
$1,636,000
1,425,000
760,000
1,417,000
4,404,000
4,574,000
1,887,000
409,000
487,000
761,000
1,844,000
120,000
1,618,000
10,717,000
5,156,000
4,032,000
1,925,000
3,615,000
912,000
2,493,000
1,963,000
5,111,000
12,346,000
8,342,000
1,094,000
4,615,000
2,123,000
2,013,000
586,000
1,193,000
3,775,000
1,519,000
15,302,000
2,853,000
2,105,000
10,665,000
1,846,000
2,320,000
11,457,000
878,000
1,130,000
1,561,000
3,218,000
2,999,000
1,692,000
1,014,000
2,970,000
3,775,000
2,573,000
7,061,000
967,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
120,000
171,858,000
*
*
*
*
(c) Should total program allocations
for any fiscal year fall below
$209,724,761, then each State’s program
allocation shall be reduced from its
allocated amount under a total program
allocation of $209,724,761 by the same
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
12540
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
percentage as total program allocations
for the fiscal year fall below
$209,724,761.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 440.18 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (c)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 440.18
Eligible dwelling units.
(a) A dwelling unit shall be eligible
for weatherization assistance under this
part if it is occupied by a family unit:
(1) Whose income is at or below 200
percent of the poverty level determined
in accordance with criteria established
by the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget,
(2) Which contains a member who has
received cash assistance payments
under Title IV or XVI of the Social
Security Act or applicable State or local
law at any time during the 12-month
period preceding the determination of
eligibility for weatherization assistance;
or
(3) If the State elects, is eligible for
assistance under the Low-Income Home
Energy Assistance Act of 1981, provided
that such basis is at least 200 percent of
the poverty level determined in
accordance with criteria established by
the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Section 440.23 is amended by
revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
§ 440.23 Oversight, training, and technical
assistance.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The Secretary may reserve from
the funds appropriated for any fiscal
year an amount not to exceed 20 percent
to provide, directly or indirectly,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
00:39 Mar 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
[FR Doc. E9–6628 Filed 3–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Allowable expenditures.
(a) Except as adjusted, the
expenditure of financial assistance
provided under this part for labor,
weatherization materials, and related
matters included in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (9) of this section shall not
exceed an average of $6,500 per
dwelling unit weatherized in the State,
except as adjusted in paragraph (c) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The $6,500 average will be
adjusted annually by DOE beginning in
calendar year 2010 and the $3,000
average for renewable energy systems
will be adjusted annually by DOE
beginning in calendar year 2007, by
increasing the limitations by an amount
equal to:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 440.22 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 440.22
training and technical assistance to any
grantee or subgrantee. Such training and
technical assistance may include
providing information concerning
conservation practices to occupants of
eligible dwelling units.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 37
[Docket Nos. RM05–17–004 and RM05–25–
004; Order No. 890–C]
Preventing Undue Discrimination and
Preference in Transmission Service
March 19, 2009.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Order on Rehearing and
Clarification.
SUMMARY: The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission affirms its basic
determinations in Order Nos. 890, 890–
A and 890–B, granting rehearing and
clarification regarding certain revisions
to its regulations and the pro forma
open-access transmission tariff, or
OATT, adopted in Order Nos. 888 and
889 to ensure that transmission services
are provided on a basis that is just,
reasonable, and not unduly
discriminatory. The Commission grants
clarification of the degree of consistency
required in the calculation of available
transfer capability by transmission
providers and denies rehearing
regarding the requirement to
undesignate network resources used to
serve off-system sales
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will
become effective March 25, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: W.
Mason Emnett, Office of the General
Counsel—Energy Markets, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Before Commissioners: Jon
Wellinghoff, Acting Chairman; Suedeen
G. Kelly, Marc Spitzer, and Philip D.
Moeller.
1. On February 16, 2007, the
Commission issued Order No. 890,1
1 Preventing Undue Discrimination and
Preference in Transmission Service, Order No. 890,
72 FR 12,266 (March 15, 2007), FERC Stats. & Regs.
¶ 31,241, order on reh’g, Order No. 890–A, 73 FR
2984 (January 16, 2008), FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶
31,261 (2007), order on reh’g, Order No. 890–B, 123
FERC ¶ 61,299 (2008).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
addressing and remedying opportunities
for undue discrimination under the pro
forma Open Access Transmission Tariff
(OATT) adopted in Order No. 888.2 The
pro forma OATT was intended to foster
greater competition in wholesale power
markets by reducing barriers to entry in
the provision of transmission service. In
the ten years since Order No. 888,
however, flaws in the pro forma OATT
undermined its ability to realize the
core objective of remedying undue
discrimination. The Commission acted
in Order No. 890 to correct these flaws
by reforming the terms and conditions
of the pro forma OATT in several
critical areas, including the calculation
of available transfer capability (ATC),
the planning of transmission facilities,
and the conditions of services offered by
each transmission provider.
2. In Order Nos. 890–A and 890–B,
the Commission largely affirmed the
reforms adopted in Order No. 890. The
Commission concluded that, taken
together, these reforms will better
enable the pro forma OATT to achieve
the core objective of remedying undue
discrimination in the provision of
transmission service. The Commission
did, however, grant rehearing and
clarification regarding certain revisions
to its regulations and the pro forma
OATT. NorthWestern Corporation
(NorthWestern) and South Carolina
Electric and Gas Co. (SCE&G) have
requested further rehearing and
clarification of Order No. 890–B on
certain discrete issues, which we
address below.
I. Reforms of the OATT
A. Consistency and Transparency of
ATC Calculations
3. In Order No. 890–B, the
Commission among other things
affirmed a clarification provided in
Order No. 890–A that adjacent
transmission providers must coordinate
and exchange data and assumptions to
achieve consistent available transfer
capability (ATC) values on either side of
a single interface.3 The Commission
stated that it disagreed with petitioners
arguing that consistent ATC values
2 Promoting Wholesale Competition Through
Open Access Non-Discriminatory Transmission
Services by Public Utilities; Recovery of Stranded
Costs by Public Utilities and Transmitting Utilities,
Order No. 888, 61 FR 21,540 (May 10, 1996), FERC
Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,026 (1996), order on reh’g, Order
No. 888–A, 62 FR 12,274 (Mar. 14, 1997), FERC
Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,048 (1997), order on reh’g, Order
No. 888–B, 81 FERC ¶ 61,248 (1997), order on reh’g,
Order No. 888–C, 82 FERC ¶ 61,046 (1998, aff’d in
relevant part sub nom. Transmission Access Policy
Study Group v. FERC, 225 F.3d 667 (DC Cir.
2000)(TAPS v. FERC), aff’d sub nom. New York v.
FERC, 535 U.S. 1 (2002).
3 Order No. 890–B at P 15.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 56 (Wednesday, March 25, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12535-12540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6628]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74 , No. 56 / Wednesday, March 25, 2009 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 12535]]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 440
[Docket No. EEWAP1201]
RIN 1904-AB84
Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income Persons
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is expanding the
definition of ``State'' under the Weatherization Assistance Program for
Low-Income Persons and amending the financial assistance allocation
procedure to reflect the expanded definition. The Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 amended the Weatherization Assistance Program
definition of ``State'' to include the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and
the other territories and possessions of the United States. Consistent
with the statutory amendment, DOE is amending the regulatory definition
of ``State,'' and amending the allocation procedure relied on to
calculate the amount of financial assistance received by each State so
as to include American Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
Further, DOE is amending the Weatherization Assistance Program
regulations consistent with recent statutory amendments in the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 25, 2009, and applicable on
March 12, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Diggs, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Weatherization
Assistance Program, EE-2K, Room 6070, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585-0121, (202) 586-8506, e-mail:
jean.diggs@ee.doe.gov, or Chris Calamita, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of the General Counsel, Forrestal Building, GC-72, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9507, e-mail:
Christopher.Calamita@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
II. Definition of ``State''
III. Allocation of Funds
IV. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
V. Effective Date
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Congressional Notification
VIII. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Introduction
Sections 411-418 of the Energy Conservation and Production Act
established the Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income
Persons (Weatherization Assistance Program). (42 U.S.C. 6861 et seq.)
The Weatherization Assistance Program reduces energy costs for low-
income households by increasing the energy efficiency of their homes,
while promoting their health and safety. DOE works in partnership with
State- and local-level agencies to implement the Weatherization
Assistance Program. DOE's Project Management Center awards grants to
State-level agencies, which then contract with local agencies.
DOE issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) to amend the
Weatherization Assistance Program regulations consistent with
amendments to the Energy Conservation and Production Act under the
Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (Pub. L. No. 110-140;
December 19, 2007). (73 FR 79414; December 29, 2008) The Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 amended the Weatherization
Assistance Program definition of ``State'' to include the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico and the other territories and possessions of the United
States. Consistent with the statutory amendment, DOE proposed to amend
the regulatory definition of ``State,'' and to amend the allocation
procedure relied on to calculate the amount of financial assistance
received by each State so as to include American Samoa, Guam,
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
DOE received one comment in response to the NOPR, from the Governor
of the Virgin Islands. The comment was generally supportive of the rule
as proposed. As explained in the remainder of this notice, DOE is
adopting the NOPR as proposed. Further, DOE is making additional
amendments to the Weatherization Assistance Program regulations
consistent with the recent statutory changes in the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. No. 111-5).
II. Definition of ``State''
DOE allocates financial assistance for weatherization to States and
Indian tribes. 10 CFR 440.10 and 440.11. Section 411(c) of the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 amended section 412 of the Energy
Conservation and Production Act to include under the definition of
``State,'' the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any other territory or
possession of the United States. (42 U.S.C. 6862(8)) In the NOPR, DOE
proposed to amend the regulatory definition of ``State'' under the
Weatherization Program consistent with the statutory definition. As
proposed the definition of ``State'' would include American Samoa,
Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands (hereafter collectively referred to
as the U.S. territories).
The amended statutory definition of ``State'' includes territories
or possessions of the United States generally, which would indicate
that the territories of Palmyra Atoll and Wake Atoll would also be
included. However, as explained in the NOPR, the territories of Palmyra
Atoll and Wake Atoll do not have significant permanent populations to
warrant inclusion in the Weatherization Program. Palmyra Atoll is a
national Wildlife Refuge and access to Wake Atoll is restricted. (See,
https://www.doi.gov/oia/Firstpginfo/islandfactsheet.htm, last visited
September 30, 2008.) The purpose of the Weatherization Assistance
Program is to provide grants ``for the purpose of providing financial
assistance with regard to projects designed to provide for the
weatherization of dwelling units, particularly those where elderly or
[[Page 12536]]
handicapped low-income persons reside, occupied by low-income
families.'' (42 U.S.C. 6863(a)) Further DOE must ``allocate financial
assistance to each State on the basis of the relative need for
weatherization assistance among low-income persons throughout the
States[.]'' (42 U.S.C. 6864) The absence of permanent populations on
Palmyra Atoll and Wake Atoll would make the inclusion of these Atolls
superfluous. As such DOE did not propose to include the territories of
Palmyra Atoll and Wake Atoll in the regulatory definition of State for
the purpose of the Weatherization Assistance Program.
The comment from the Governor of the Virgin Islands supported
inclusion of the U.S. territories in the definition of ``State,'' and
urged DOE to finalize the revised definition in advance of distributing
funds made available under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
of 2009.
DOE has concluded that the rationale for the proposed definition
remains valid. Therefore, DOE is amending the definition of ``State,''
as proposed, to mean each of the States, the District of Columbia,
American Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
III. Allocation of Funds
Each year Congress appropriates funds to implement the
Weatherization Assistance Program. A portion of the appropriated funds
is used for training and technical assistance. The remaining funds,
comprising the majority of the appropriated funds, are distributed to
the States as program funds based on a two-part allocation.
From the total appropriation, DOE reserves funds for national
training and technical assistance (T&TA) activities that benefit all
States. In addition, DOE specifically allocates funding to States for
T&TA activities at both the State and local levels. Prior to the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the total funds for
national, State, and local T&TA could not exceed 10 percent of the
Congressional appropriation. Section 407 of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 increased the percent of funds eligible for
T&TA to up to 20 percent. (42 U.S.C. 6866) The remaining funds comprise
the State program allocations.
If the State program allocations in a fiscal year (FY) are at or
above the amount allocated to States in FY 1994 under Public Law No.
103-332 (September 30, 1994) (i.e., the funds made available to the
Weatherization Assistance Program minus funds for T&TA, which equaled
$209,724,761) the State program allocations are distributed according
to a two-part allocation procedure. Should total funds for State
program allocation fall below $209,724,761, the allocations to States
are reduced proportionally. See 10 CFR 440.10(c).
The two-part allocation is comprised of a base allocation plus a
formula allocation. See 10 CFR 440.10(b). The base allocation for each
State is fixed, but differs for each State and was derived from each
State's allocation under the appropriations for FY 1993.\1\ The base
allocation was developed to minimize fluctuations in funds received by
States between fiscal years resulting from changes in the total amount
of appropriated funds received for the Weatherization Assistance
Program. The base allocation was established in response to concern
that substantial fluctuation between annual funds could disrupt a
State's program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Calculation of each State's share of the funds was based on
a formula different from that in the current regulations. See, 60 FR
4480, 4482; January 23, 1995.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the two-part allocation, funds in excess of the total base
allocation are allocated among States according to the formula
allocation set forth in 10 CFR 440.10(b)(3). A State's formula
allocation is based on three factors for each State. Factor 1, Low-
Income Population, represents the share of the nation's low-income
households in each State expressed as a percentage of all U.S. low-
income households. Factor 2, Climatic Conditions, is obtained from the
heating and cooling degrees for each State, treating the energy needed
for heating and cooling proportionately. Factor 3, Residential Energy
Expenditures by Low-Income Households in each State, is an
approximation of the financial burden that energy use places on low-
income households. The approximation is necessary because State-
specific data on residential energy expenditures by low-income
households is generally lacking.
In the NOPR, DOE proposed to revise how funds are allocated under
the Weatherization Assistance Program so as to include the U.S.
territories. The proposed revisions were based on a method for
determining the base and formula allocation for the U.S. territories
that was consistent with how the current allocation method for States
was developed.
Essentially, the Department followed the development process used
in 1995 to establish the existing allocation method (i.e., basing the
allocation formula on FY 1994 allocation) under the assumption that at
that time the U.S. territories were included in the Weatherization
Assistance Program. DOE recognized that the data used to calculate a
State's share of the funds under the 1995 rulemaking are not available
for the U.S. territories. Therefore, DOE proposed to use Hawaii's
information for the U.S. territories. Similar to Hawaii, the U.S.
territories are in hot climates with virtually no heating load, are all
islands, and share a common main fuel type used in low-income
households, electricity.
A. Allocation Threshold
As discussed in the previous paragraphs, the allocation of funding
under the Weatherization Assistance Program is dependent first upon
whether the total funds available for allocation to the States
(excluding funds for T&TA) are at or above the level made available
under Public Law No. 103-322, i.e., $209,724,761. In order to make the
regulations clearer, the Department is replacing the references in 10
CFR part 440 to the ``total program allocations under Public Law No.
103-322'' with the actual dollar value. This amendment does not impact
the allocation process, and is solely for the purpose of making the
current regulation easier to read and understand.
B. Base Allocation
To reflect the addition of the U.S. territories to the
Weatherization Assistance Program, DOE is revising the base allocation
to include the newly added jurisdictions, as proposed. As discussed
previously, DOE relied on Hawaii's base allocation ($120,000) as the
base allocation for the U.S. territories. This revision does not reduce
the base allocation amount for any State, but instead increases the
total base allocation value so as to include the U.S. territories.
The comment from the Governor of the Virgin Islands supported the
use of data from Hawaii, although indicated that such data could be
made available for the Virgin Islands. However, such data was not
provided as part of the comment.
For the reasons expressed in the NOPR and in this Final Rule, DOE
is adopting the Base Allocation as proposed.
C. Formula Allocation
In addition to a base allocation, DOE will now allocate
weatherization funds to the U.S. territories through the formula
allocation. Essentially, the weatherization funds will be based on
[[Page 12537]]
the U.S. territories' (1) Number of low-income households (10 CFR
440.10(b)(3)(i)), (2) number of ``heating degree'' and ``cooling
degree'' days (10 CFR 440.10(b)(3)(ii) and (iii)), and (3) average
residential household energy expenditures (10 CFR 440.10(b)(3)(v)). DOE
recognizes that data for the third factor of the formula allocation,
i.e., average residential household energy expenditures, may not be
available for all the U.S. territories. In the instances in which DOE
does not have such data, DOE will again rely on comparable data from a
comparable State, i.e., Hawaii, as proposed. This approach does not
require revisions to the regulatory text for the formula allocation.
IV. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
Section 407 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
amended several of the Weatherization Assistance Program provisions in
the Energy Conservation and Production Act. The amendments under
section 407--
Increased the referenced percentage of the poverty level
in the definition of ``low income'' from 150 percent to 200 percent (42
U.S.C. 6862(7));
Increased the limit on the minimum average expenditure per
dwelling unit from $2,500 to $6,500 (42 U.S.C. 6865(c)(1));
Increased the maximum amount of appropriated funds that
the Department may apply towards T&TA from 10 percent of the
appropriated sums to 20 percent (42 U.S.C. 6866); and
Extended eligibility for further financial assistance to
dwelling units that had been partially weatherized under a Federal
program from September 30, 1975, through September 30, 1994.
The first three of these amendments under section 407 of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 require updates to the
Weatherization Assistance Program regulations. Today's final rule
amends the regulations consistent with these changes. The time period
for previously received financial assistance as it relates to dwelling
eligibility is governed by the statute and is not reflected in
regulation, and as such there is no existing regulation to update.
DOE finds that there is good cause to amend the Weatherization
Assistance Program regulations consistent with the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 without providing an opportunity for
notice and comment as such procedures are unnecessary. DOE is
establishing the maximum percent of poverty level referenced in the
definition of ``low income,'' the maximum permitted expenditure per
dwelling, or the maximum percent of funds permitted to be used for T&TA
in accordance with the specific provisions of the statute. DOE is
exercising no discretion in codifying these provisions and does not
have the authority to amend the specific aspects of these provisions.
Thus, no useful purpose would be served by offering an opportunity for
public comment.
V. Effective Date
Today's final rule is effective on March 25, 2009. Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Department finds good cause that the effective
date of this final rule need not be delayed. In the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Congress appropriated $5 billion for the
Weatherization Assistance Program. The stated purposes of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 are--
(1) To preserve and create jobs and promote economic recovery.
(2) To assist those most impacted by the recession.
(3) To provide investments needed to increase economic efficiency
by spurring technological advances in science and health.
(4) To invest in transportation, environmental protection, and
other infrastructure that will provide long-term economic benefits.
(5) To stabilize State and local government budgets, in order to
minimize and avoid reductions in essential services and
counterproductive state and local tax increases. (Section 3(a), Pub. L.
No. 11-5) Moreover, Congress directed the agencies to manage and expend
the funds made available so as to achieve the specified purposes,
including commencing expenditures and activities as quickly as possible
consistent with prudent management. (Section 3(b), Pub. L. No. 11-5) A
delay in the effective date of today's final rule would delay the
allocation of weatherization assistance funds to the States including
the U.S. territories.\2\ DOE believes it would be contrary to the
public interest to delay the allocation of weatherization funds made
available under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Thus, a delay to the final rule would be inconsistent with the
Congressional direction to commence expenditures as quickly as
possible, and thereby unnecessary, impracticable, and contrary to
public interest. For the reasons stated above, DOE finds good cause,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), to waive the 30-day delay in effective
date required by the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative
Procedures Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The comment from the Governor of the Virgin Islands
encouraged DOE to apply the amended definition and allocation
formula to funds made available under the Consolidated Security,
Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub.
L. No. 110-329; September 30, 2008). Today's final rule will apply
to fund allocation determinations made following the issuance date
of today's final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Regulatory Analysis
A. Review under Executive Order 12866
Today's final rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735; October 4, 1993). Accordingly, today's action
was not subject to review by the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
B. Review under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires the
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. As required
by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in
Agency Rulemaking,'' (67 FR 53461; August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure that the
potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking process (68 FR 7990). DOE has made its
procedures and policies available on the Office of General Counsel's
Web site: https://www.gc.doe.gov.
DOE has reviewed today's final rule for the Weatherization
Assistance Program under the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. Today's final rule incorporates statutory changes made to the
Weatherization Assistance Program. The amendments include the U.S.
territories in the Weatherization Assistance Program to the same extent
as States are currently included. This rule will directly affect States
and individual recipients of assistance. It will not have an economic
impact on small entities. On this basis, DOE certifies that today's
final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this rulemaking.
[[Page 12538]]
C. Review Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
DOE has determined that today's final rule is covered under the
Categorical Exclusion found in DOE's National Environmental Policy Act
regulations at paragraph A.6. of Appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part
1021. That Categorical Exclusion applies to rulemakings that are
strictly procedural, such as rulemaking establishing the administration
of grants. Today's final rule establishes the procedure for allocating
funds under the Weatherization Assistance Program so as to cover, in
addition to the States and the District of Columbia, the U.S.
territories. The regulations will not have any independent
environmental impact. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared an
environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement.
D. Review Under Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132, 64 FR 43255 (August 4, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on agencies formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that pre-empt State law or that have federalism
implications. Agencies are required to examine the constitutional and
statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the
policymaking discretion of the States and carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. DOE has examined today's final rule and has
determined that it will not pre-empt State law and will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. No further
action is required by Executive Order 13132.
E. Review Under Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, 61 FR 4729 (February 7, 1996), imposes on
Executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard and
promote simplification and burden reduction. The review required by
sections 3(a) and 3(b) of Executive Order 12988 specifically requires
that Executive agencies make every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the pre-emptive effect, if any; (2)
clearly specifies any effect on existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive
effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship
under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
Executive Order 12988 requires Executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b) to determine
whether they are met or it is unreasonable to meet one or more of them.
DOE has completed the required review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, today's final rule meets the relevant
standards of Executive Order 12988.
F. Review Under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine closely the impacts of regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal governments. Subsection 101(5) of
Title I of that law defines a Federal intergovernmental mandate to
include any regulation that would impose upon State, local, or tribal
governments an enforceable duty, except a condition of Federal
assistance or a duty arising from participating in a voluntary Federal
program. Title II of that law requires each Federal agency to assess
the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, other than to
the extent such actions merely incorporate requirements specifically
set forth in a statute. Section 202 of that title requires a Federal
agency to perform a detailed assessment of the anticipated costs and
benefits of any rule that includes a Federal mandate which may result
in costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private
sector, of $100 million or more. Section 204 of that title requires
each agency that proposes a rule containing a significant Federal
intergovernmental mandate to develop an effective process for obtaining
meaningful and timely input from elected officers of State, local, and
tribal governments.
Today's final rule will not impose a Federal mandate on State,
local or tribal governments, and it will not result in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Accordingly,
no assessment or analysis is required under the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
G. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act
of 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a
Family Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family
well-being. Today's final rule will not have any impact on the autonomy
or integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
H. Review Under the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act
of 2001
Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 2001 (44 U.S.C. 3516, note) provides for agencies to review most
disseminations of information to the public under guidelines
established by each agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB's guidelines were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002),
and DOE's guidelines were published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002).
DOE has reviewed today's final rule under the OMB and DOE guidelines
and has concluded that it is consistent with applicable policies in
those guidelines.
I. Review Under Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001), requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
OMB a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed significant energy
action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined as any action by an
agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to promulgation of a
final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, or (3) is designated by the Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) as a significant energy
action. For any proposed significant energy action, the agency must
give a detailed statement of any adverse effects on energy supply,
distribution, or use, should the proposal be implemented, and of
reasonable alternatives to the action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
[[Page 12539]]
Today's regulatory action will not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy and is therefore
not a significant energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
J. Review Under Executive Order 13175
Executive Order 13175. ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249; November 9, 2000), requires DOE to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal implications''
refers to regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' Today's regulatory
action is not a policy that has ``tribal implications'' under Executive
Order 13175.
Under the Weatherization Assistance Program, a tribal organization
may qualify as a unit of general purpose local government and,
therefore, be eligible to apply for funds. See 10 CFR 440.11. Today's
regulatory action will not change the eligibility of Indian tribes to
apply for or receive funds under the Weatherization Assistance Program.
Today's regulatory action will include the U.S. territories in the
allocation of available funds. DOE has reviewed today's final rule
under Executive Order 13175 and has determined that it is consistent
with applicable policies of that Executive Order.
VII. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of this rule prior to its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VIII. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of today's final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 440
Administrative practice and procedure, Energy conservation, Grant
programs--energy, Grant programs--housing and community development,
Housing standards, Indians, Individuals with disabilities, Reporting
and record keeping requirements, Weatherization.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 12, 2009.
Steve Chalk,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DOE amends part 440 of
chapter II of title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, to read as
follows:
PART 440--WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR LOW-INCOME PERSONS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 440 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6861 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
0
2. Section 440.3 is amended by revising the definitions of ``low
income'' and ``State'' to read as follows:
Sec. 440.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Low Income means that income in relation to family size which:
(1) At or below 200 percent of the poverty level determined in
accordance with criteria established by the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget, except that the Secretary may establish a higher
level if the Secretary, after consulting with the Secretary of
Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, determines
that such a higher level is necessary to carry out the purposes of this
part and is consistent with the eligibility criteria established for
the weatherization program under Section 222(a)(12) of the Economic
Opportunity Act of 1964;
(2) Is the basis on which cash assistance payments have been paid
during the preceding twelve month-period under Titles IV and XVI of the
Social Security Act or applicable State or local law; or
(3) If a State elects, is the basis for eligibility for assistance
under the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981, provided that
such basis is at least 200 percent of the poverty level determined in
accordance with criteria established by the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget.
* * * * *
State means each of the States, the District of Columbia, American
Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 440.10 is amended by:
0
a. Removing the phrase ``total program allocations under Pub. L. 103-
332'' in paragraph (b) introductory text and adding in its place
``$209,724,761'';
0
b. Revising Table 1 in paragraph (b)(1) and paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 440.10 Allocation of funds.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
Base Allocation Table
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base
State allocation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama................................................. $1,636,000
Alaska.................................................. 1,425,000
Arizona................................................. 760,000
Arkansas................................................ 1,417,000
California.............................................. 4,404,000
Colorado................................................ 4,574,000
Connecticut............................................. 1,887,000
Delaware................................................ 409,000
District of Columbia.................................... 487,000
Florida................................................. 761,000
Georgia................................................. 1,844,000
Hawaii.................................................. 120,000
Idaho................................................... 1,618,000
Illinois................................................ 10,717,000
Indiana................................................. 5,156,000
Iowa.................................................... 4,032,000
Kansas.................................................. 1,925,000
Kentucky................................................ 3,615,000
Louisiana............................................... 912,000
Maine................................................... 2,493,000
Maryland................................................ 1,963,000
Massachusetts........................................... 5,111,000
Michigan................................................ 12,346,000
Minnesota............................................... 8,342,000
Mississippi............................................. 1,094,000
Missouri................................................ 4,615,000
Montana................................................. 2,123,000
Nebraska................................................ 2,013,000
Nevada.................................................. 586,000
New Hampshire........................................... 1,193,000
New Jersey.............................................. 3,775,000
New Mexico.............................................. 1,519,000
New York................................................ 15,302,000
North Carolina.......................................... 2,853,000
North Dakota............................................ 2,105,000
Ohio.................................................... 10,665,000
Oklahoma................................................ 1,846,000
Oregon.................................................. 2,320,000
Pennsylvania............................................ 11,457,000
Rhode Island............................................ 878,000
South Carolina.......................................... 1,130,000
South Dakota............................................ 1,561,000
Tennessee............................................... 3,218,000
Texas................................................... 2,999,000
Utah.................................................... 1,692,000
Vermont................................................. 1,014,000
Virginia................................................ 2,970,000
Washington.............................................. 3,775,000
West Virginia........................................... 2,573,000
Wisconsin............................................... 7,061,000
Wyoming................................................. 967,000
American Samoa.......................................... 120,000
Guam.................................................... 120,000
Puerto Rico............................................. 120,000
Northern Mariana Islands................................ 120,000
Virgin Islands.......................................... 120,000
Total................................................... 171,858,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(c) Should total program allocations for any fiscal year fall below
$209,724,761, then each State's program allocation shall be reduced
from its allocated amount under a total program allocation of
$209,724,761 by the same
[[Page 12540]]
percentage as total program allocations for the fiscal year fall below
$209,724,761.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 440.18 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 440.18 Allowable expenditures.
(a) Except as adjusted, the expenditure of financial assistance
provided under this part for labor, weatherization materials, and
related matters included in paragraphs (c)(1) through (9) of this
section shall not exceed an average of $6,500 per dwelling unit
weatherized in the State, except as adjusted in paragraph (c) of this
section.
* * * * *
(c) The $6,500 average will be adjusted annually by DOE beginning
in calendar year 2010 and the $3,000 average for renewable energy
systems will be adjusted annually by DOE beginning in calendar year
2007, by increasing the limitations by an amount equal to:
* * * * *
0
5. Section 440.22 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 440.22 Eligible dwelling units.
(a) A dwelling unit shall be eligible for weatherization assistance
under this part if it is occupied by a family unit:
(1) Whose income is at or below 200 percent of the poverty level
determined in accordance with criteria established by the Director of
the Office of Management and Budget,
(2) Which contains a member who has received cash assistance
payments under Title IV or XVI of the Social Security Act or applicable
State or local law at any time during the 12-month period preceding the
determination of eligibility for weatherization assistance; or
(3) If the State elects, is eligible for assistance under the Low-
Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981, provided that such basis is
at least 200 percent of the poverty level determined in accordance with
criteria established by the Director of the Office of Management and
Budget.
* * * * *
0
6. Section 440.23 is amended by revising paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 440.23 Oversight, training, and technical assistance.
* * * * *
(e) The Secretary may reserve from the funds appropriated for any
fiscal year an amount not to exceed 20 percent to provide, directly or
indirectly, training and technical assistance to any grantee or
subgrantee. Such training and technical assistance may include
providing information concerning conservation practices to occupants of
eligible dwelling units.
[FR Doc. E9-6628 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P