Notice Designating Purdue University as Visualization Sciences and Education Lead Institution for the DHS Center of Excellence for Command, Control and Interoperability, 12372-12373 [E9-6450]
Download as PDF
12372
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Notice Designating Purdue University
as Visualization Sciences and
Education Lead Institution for the DHS
Center of Excellence for Command,
Control and Interoperability
AGENCY: Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security has designated Purdue
University as Visualization Sciences
and Education Lead Institution for the
DHS Center of Excellence for Command,
Control and Interoperability.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Kielman, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528; telephone 202–254–5787; e-mail
joseph.kielman@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 308 of the Homeland Security
Act of 2002, Public Law 107–296, (the
‘‘Homeland Security Act’’), as amended
by the Consolidated Appropriations
Resolution 2003, Public Law 108–7, and
as codified in Title 6 of the United
States Code Chapter I Subchapter III
Section 188(b)(2) [6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)],
directs the Department of Homeland
Security (‘‘Department’’) to sponsor
extramural research, development,
demonstration, testing and evaluation
programs relating to homeland security.
As part of this program, the Department
has established a coordinated system of
university-based centers for homeland
security (the ‘‘Centers’’).
The Centers are envisioned to be an
integral component of the Department’s
capability to anticipate, prevent,
respond to, and recover from terrorist
attacks and natural disasters. The
Centers will leverage multidisciplinary
capabilities and fill gaps in current
knowledge.
Title 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B) lists
fourteen areas of substantive expertise
that, if demonstrated, might qualify
universities for designation as
university-based centers. The listed
areas of expertise include: (1) The
training of first responders; (2)
responding to incidents involving
weapons of mass destruction and
biological warfare; (3) emergency and
diagnostic medical services; (4)
chemical, biological, radiological and
nuclear countermeasures or detection;
(5) animal and plant health and
diagnostics; (6) food safety; (7) water
and wastewater operations; (8) port and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:06 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
waterway security; (9) multi-modal
transportation; (10) information security
and information engineering; (11)
engineering; (12) educational outreach
and technical assistance; (13) border
and transportation security; and (14) the
public policy implications and public
dissemination of homeland security
relevant research and development.
However, this list is not exclusive.
Title 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(C) gives the
Secretary discretion to except certain
criteria specified in 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B)
and consider additional criteria beyond
those specified in 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B)
in selecting universities for this
program, as long as the Department
issues a Federal Register notice
explaining the criteria used for the
designation. This Center of Excellence
will address statutory criterion 6 U.S.C.
188(b)(2)(B)(10), information security
and information engineering.
Evaluation
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) chose Purdue University
and its partner institutions for the new
Center of Excellence (COE) through a
merit-based, competitive, and rigorous
review process consistent with
guidelines set forth in Section 308 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L.
107–296), as amended. The DHS
Science and Technology Directorate
(S&T) issued a research funding
opportunity announcement (FOA)
soliciting applications for the
establishment of a COE for the Study of
Command, Control and Interoperability
(CCI) issues on May 1, 2008 on https://
www.grants.gov.
DHS received eight proposals in
response to this announcement.
External subject matter experts
considered the merits of these proposals
with respect to the evaluation criteria in
the announcement and referred four
proposals to a DHS internal review
panel. DHS subject matter experts
evaluated the proposals in light of DHS
priorities and investments and made
recommendations. A select team of S&T
staff made site visits to all four
applicants considered by the internal
review panel. At the end of the
competitive review, University
Programs selected the lead institutions
in accordance with Section 308 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Criteria
As communicated in the funding
opportunity announcement and to the
reviewers, the evaluation criteria for
proposals were as follows. The first six
criteria (a–f) were critical elements of
the proposal and were of equal
significance. Proposals that did not
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
provide satisfactory responses to all of
these essential criteria were declined.
The remaining criteria (g–m) also were
important to meeting S&T’s overall
objectives. They were listed in
approximate descending order of
importance, and needed to be fully
addressed by applicants.
a. Responsiveness: The degree to
which the proposal directly responds to
the research areas, topics or questions
described in the funding opportunity
announcement, with appropriate
scientific theory, methods, and data.
b. Technical Merit and Quality: The
degree to which the proposed research
focus will achieve excellence (to offer
results capable of commanding the
respect of active researchers and of
probing a frontier area well). The
originality and creativity of the
proposed research questions and the
appropriateness and adequacy of the
proposed research methods.
c. Mission-Related Significance: The
degree to which the proposed research
focus can yield results that overcome
existing and difficult technical
limitations, or that offer the scientific
basis to enable major technological
advances in the foreseeable future. The
responsiveness of the proposal to the
research needs identified in this
announcement and the willingness and
ability of the applicants to consult with
Federal, State, local and private
stakeholders to refine research questions
and design to make results applicable to
homeland security issues or policy.
d. Geographical Distribution of All
Centers of Excellence and Major
Partners: The Centers of Excellence
program’s authorizing legislation states:
‘‘ * * * the Under Secretary for Science
and Technology, shall operate
extramural research, development,
demonstration, testing and evaluation
programs so as to ensure that colleges,
universities, private research institutes
and companies from as many regions of
the United States as practicable
participate.’’ Geographical location of
the lead institution and its major
partners will be a factor in evaluating
proposals submitted in response to this
COE.
e. Qualifications of Investigators: The
qualifications of the principal
investigator(s) and other key personnel,
including training, demonstrated
knowledge of pertinent literature,
experience, and publication records,
and the extent to which key personnel
will make a significant time
commitment to the project.
f. Productive Use of Federal
Resources: The ability to extend the
productivity of Federal funds and other
resources through matching funds,
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
leveraging of other new fund sources,
in-kind provision of faculty, student
support, dedicated office or laboratory
space.
g. Facilities and Equipment: The
availability and/or adequacy of the
facilities and equipment proposed for
the project.
h. Management: The ability of the
lead institution to manage a complex
Center of Excellence in terms of
achieving research results when due,
managing large and complex budgets
and communicating research outcomes,
and the adequacy of the proposed
management plan to ensure quality
research and education programs from
researchers at both primary and partner
institutions.
i. Minority Serving Institution
Partnerships: The demonstrated ability
and commitment to establish
meaningful partnerships with MSIs to
develop a quality MSI research and
training program, and the quality of the
proposed program.
j. Education: The adequacy of
education plans and supporting
materials demonstrating the proposed
COE’s ability to establish an enduring
and comprehensive program of study in
disciplines related to the specific
research areas cited in this
announcement.
k. Knowledge of Current Research:
Evidence that the applicant is familiar
with the research and resources of
existing DHS COEs, other DHS S&T,
Federal agency or National Laboratory
research and development programs,
and other relevant university programs
and can demonstrate its ability to take
advantage of these resources.
l. Results Transition: The
effectiveness and soundness of a
strategy to transition research results to
end users and mechanisms to
accomplish this transition, and
demonstration of a clear and effective
plan for transitioning research results
for each project or research area
ultimately to homeland security mission
agencies.
m. Budget: Although budget
information does not reflect on the
application’s scientific merit, the
evaluation will include the
appropriateness and/or adequacy of the
proposed budget and its implications for
the potential success of the proposed
research. Input on requested equipment
is of particular interest.
Summary
This COE will conduct fundamental
research into the technological issues,
challenges, and policy issues related to
(1) dynamic, on-demand data processing
and visualization; (2) hypothesis-driven
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:06 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
data analysis; (3) visualization of
structured, unstructured, and streaming
data; (4) mathematics of discrete and
visual analytics; (5) scalable information
filtering and dissemination; (6)
visualization and simulation of
information; (7) mobile and light-weight
information analytics and sharing. This
COE will create the scientific basis and
enduring technologies needed to
analyze massive amounts of information
from multiple sources to more reliably
detect threats to the security of the
nation and its infrastructures, and to the
health and welfare of its populace.
These new technologies will also
improve the dissemination of both
information and related technologies.
Based on information collected in the
evaluation process, DHS designated
Purdue University as Visualization
Sciences and Education Lead Institution
for the DHS Center of Excellence for
Command, Control and Interoperability,
in partnership with Rutgers University
(the Data Sciences Lead Institution) and
other affiliates. This team of institutions
is uniquely well qualified and located to
address data analysis, visualization,
cyber security and other related issues.
They will become an intrinsic part of
the DHS science and technology
portfolio, working closely with DHS and
other Federal, State, and local
governments to solve complex and
critical data and visualization science
challenges.
Matthew Clark,
Director, University Programs, Science and
Technology Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9–6450 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9F–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0169]
Head and Gut Fleet; Guidance for
Implementation of the Alternate
Compliance and Safety Agreement
Program
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces
the availability of guidance for
implementation of the Alternate
Compliance and Safety Agreement
program for ‘‘head and gut fleet’’
vessels. The guidance clarifies various
elements contained in the original 2006
policy letter relating to that program,
and in a 2006 Federal Register notice
that announced the availability of that
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12373
policy letter. Among these elements is
the issuance of a conditional load line
exemption for head and gut vessels.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or e-mail M. M. Rosecrans, Chief,
Fishing Vessel Safety Division (CG–
5433), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202–
372–1245, e-mail
Michael.M.Rosecrans@uscg.mil.
If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
In the August 22, 2006 Federal
Register (71 FR 48932), we announced
the availability of Coast Guard G–PCV
policy letter 06–03, concerning the
applicability of vessel classification and
load line requirements set by 46 CFR
Part 28, Subpart F, and 46 CFR
Subchapter E to ‘‘head and gut fleet’’
vessels. The head and gut (H&G) fleet
consists of approximately 60 vessels
that operate in the Gulf of Alaska and
the Bering Sea/Aleutian Island fisheries.
Crews on H&G vessels not only catch
fish, but also freeze and package the
catch for later distribution to foreign
and domestic markets. Due to the age of
most H&G vessels and the costs
associated with compliance, the
majority of the H&G fleet cannot comply
with classification and load line
requirements. The policy announced in
2006 provides a safe and economical
alternative: H&G vessel owners may
apply for and be granted an exemption
from those requirements, so long as they
meet Alternate Compliance and Safety
Agreement (ACSA) program elements
that provide an equivalent level of
safety. The ACSA Program was
developed in 2006 to process individual
requests for exemption letters under 46
CFR 28.60. The Program allows
exemptions to the class and Load Line
requirements while at the same time
creating improved safety requirements
for these vessels, thereby avoiding the
incentive to operate strictly as
uninspected fishing vessels. ACSA
vessel owners work with the Coast
Guard to develop alternative standards
for their vessels, and compliance with
those standards is facilitated through
voluntary vessel examination by Coast
Guard personnel. Guidance for
implementation of the ACSA program is
available at https://www.fishsafe.info/
acsaguidance. This guidance document
reiterates and clarifies information
already provided in the ACSA Program
governing guidance of the G–PCV Policy
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12372-12373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6450]
[[Page 12372]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Notice Designating Purdue University as Visualization Sciences
and Education Lead Institution for the DHS Center of Excellence for
Command, Control and Interoperability
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security has designated Purdue
University as Visualization Sciences and Education Lead Institution for
the DHS Center of Excellence for Command, Control and Interoperability.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Kielman, Science and Technology
Directorate, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528;
telephone 202-254-5787; e-mail joseph.kielman@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 308 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107-
296, (the ``Homeland Security Act''), as amended by the Consolidated
Appropriations Resolution 2003, Public Law 108-7, and as codified in
Title 6 of the United States Code Chapter I Subchapter III Section
188(b)(2) [6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)], directs the Department of Homeland
Security (``Department'') to sponsor extramural research, development,
demonstration, testing and evaluation programs relating to homeland
security. As part of this program, the Department has established a
coordinated system of university-based centers for homeland security
(the ``Centers'').
The Centers are envisioned to be an integral component of the
Department's capability to anticipate, prevent, respond to, and recover
from terrorist attacks and natural disasters. The Centers will leverage
multidisciplinary capabilities and fill gaps in current knowledge.
Title 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B) lists fourteen areas of substantive
expertise that, if demonstrated, might qualify universities for
designation as university-based centers. The listed areas of expertise
include: (1) The training of first responders; (2) responding to
incidents involving weapons of mass destruction and biological warfare;
(3) emergency and diagnostic medical services; (4) chemical,
biological, radiological and nuclear countermeasures or detection; (5)
animal and plant health and diagnostics; (6) food safety; (7) water and
wastewater operations; (8) port and waterway security; (9) multi-modal
transportation; (10) information security and information engineering;
(11) engineering; (12) educational outreach and technical assistance;
(13) border and transportation security; and (14) the public policy
implications and public dissemination of homeland security relevant
research and development.
However, this list is not exclusive. Title 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(C)
gives the Secretary discretion to except certain criteria specified in
6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B) and consider additional criteria beyond those
specified in 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B) in selecting universities for this
program, as long as the Department issues a Federal Register notice
explaining the criteria used for the designation. This Center of
Excellence will address statutory criterion 6 U.S.C. 188(b)(2)(B)(10),
information security and information engineering.
Evaluation
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chose Purdue University
and its partner institutions for the new Center of Excellence (COE)
through a merit-based, competitive, and rigorous review process
consistent with guidelines set forth in Section 308 of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-296), as amended. The DHS Science and
Technology Directorate (S&T) issued a research funding opportunity
announcement (FOA) soliciting applications for the establishment of a
COE for the Study of Command, Control and Interoperability (CCI) issues
on May 1, 2008 on https://www.grants.gov.
DHS received eight proposals in response to this announcement.
External subject matter experts considered the merits of these
proposals with respect to the evaluation criteria in the announcement
and referred four proposals to a DHS internal review panel. DHS subject
matter experts evaluated the proposals in light of DHS priorities and
investments and made recommendations. A select team of S&T staff made
site visits to all four applicants considered by the internal review
panel. At the end of the competitive review, University Programs
selected the lead institutions in accordance with Section 308 of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002.
Criteria
As communicated in the funding opportunity announcement and to the
reviewers, the evaluation criteria for proposals were as follows. The
first six criteria (a-f) were critical elements of the proposal and
were of equal significance. Proposals that did not provide satisfactory
responses to all of these essential criteria were declined. The
remaining criteria (g-m) also were important to meeting S&T's overall
objectives. They were listed in approximate descending order of
importance, and needed to be fully addressed by applicants.
a. Responsiveness: The degree to which the proposal directly
responds to the research areas, topics or questions described in the
funding opportunity announcement, with appropriate scientific theory,
methods, and data.
b. Technical Merit and Quality: The degree to which the proposed
research focus will achieve excellence (to offer results capable of
commanding the respect of active researchers and of probing a frontier
area well). The originality and creativity of the proposed research
questions and the appropriateness and adequacy of the proposed research
methods.
c. Mission-Related Significance: The degree to which the proposed
research focus can yield results that overcome existing and difficult
technical limitations, or that offer the scientific basis to enable
major technological advances in the foreseeable future. The
responsiveness of the proposal to the research needs identified in this
announcement and the willingness and ability of the applicants to
consult with Federal, State, local and private stakeholders to refine
research questions and design to make results applicable to homeland
security issues or policy.
d. Geographical Distribution of All Centers of Excellence and Major
Partners: The Centers of Excellence program's authorizing legislation
states: `` * * * the Under Secretary for Science and Technology, shall
operate extramural research, development, demonstration, testing and
evaluation programs so as to ensure that colleges, universities,
private research institutes and companies from as many regions of the
United States as practicable participate.'' Geographical location of
the lead institution and its major partners will be a factor in
evaluating proposals submitted in response to this COE.
e. Qualifications of Investigators: The qualifications of the
principal investigator(s) and other key personnel, including training,
demonstrated knowledge of pertinent literature, experience, and
publication records, and the extent to which key personnel will make a
significant time commitment to the project.
f. Productive Use of Federal Resources: The ability to extend the
productivity of Federal funds and other resources through matching
funds,
[[Page 12373]]
leveraging of other new fund sources, in-kind provision of faculty,
student support, dedicated office or laboratory space.
g. Facilities and Equipment: The availability and/or adequacy of
the facilities and equipment proposed for the project.
h. Management: The ability of the lead institution to manage a
complex Center of Excellence in terms of achieving research results
when due, managing large and complex budgets and communicating research
outcomes, and the adequacy of the proposed management plan to ensure
quality research and education programs from researchers at both
primary and partner institutions.
i. Minority Serving Institution Partnerships: The demonstrated
ability and commitment to establish meaningful partnerships with MSIs
to develop a quality MSI research and training program, and the quality
of the proposed program.
j. Education: The adequacy of education plans and supporting
materials demonstrating the proposed COE's ability to establish an
enduring and comprehensive program of study in disciplines related to
the specific research areas cited in this announcement.
k. Knowledge of Current Research: Evidence that the applicant is
familiar with the research and resources of existing DHS COEs, other
DHS S&T, Federal agency or National Laboratory research and development
programs, and other relevant university programs and can demonstrate
its ability to take advantage of these resources.
l. Results Transition: The effectiveness and soundness of a
strategy to transition research results to end users and mechanisms to
accomplish this transition, and demonstration of a clear and effective
plan for transitioning research results for each project or research
area ultimately to homeland security mission agencies.
m. Budget: Although budget information does not reflect on the
application's scientific merit, the evaluation will include the
appropriateness and/or adequacy of the proposed budget and its
implications for the potential success of the proposed research. Input
on requested equipment is of particular interest.
Summary
This COE will conduct fundamental research into the technological
issues, challenges, and policy issues related to (1) dynamic, on-demand
data processing and visualization; (2) hypothesis-driven data analysis;
(3) visualization of structured, unstructured, and streaming data; (4)
mathematics of discrete and visual analytics; (5) scalable information
filtering and dissemination; (6) visualization and simulation of
information; (7) mobile and light-weight information analytics and
sharing. This COE will create the scientific basis and enduring
technologies needed to analyze massive amounts of information from
multiple sources to more reliably detect threats to the security of the
nation and its infrastructures, and to the health and welfare of its
populace. These new technologies will also improve the dissemination of
both information and related technologies.
Based on information collected in the evaluation process, DHS
designated Purdue University as Visualization Sciences and Education
Lead Institution for the DHS Center of Excellence for Command, Control
and Interoperability, in partnership with Rutgers University (the Data
Sciences Lead Institution) and other affiliates. This team of
institutions is uniquely well qualified and located to address data
analysis, visualization, cyber security and other related issues. They
will become an intrinsic part of the DHS science and technology
portfolio, working closely with DHS and other Federal, State, and local
governments to solve complex and critical data and visualization
science challenges.
Matthew Clark,
Director, University Programs, Science and Technology Directorate,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9-6450 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9F-P