Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the New Haven-Hartford and New London, CT, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas, 12280-12282 [E9-6364]
Download as PDF
12280
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 55
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206–AL83
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition
of the New Haven-Hartford and New
London, CT, Appropriated Fund
Federal Wage System Wage Areas
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) is issuing a
proposed rule that would define the
New Haven-Hartford and New London,
CT, appropriated fund Federal Wage
System (FWS) wage areas by county
rather than by city and town
boundaries. Defining the New England
FWS wage areas by primarily
considering county boundaries would
provide greater consistency in how
OPM defines FWS wage areas and
would improve the ability to make
direct data comparisons with Census
Bureau data. The proposed rule would
define the New Haven-Hartford wage
area to include Hartford and New Haven
Counties, CT, as the survey area and
Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and
Tolland Counties, CT, as the area of
application and the New London wage
area to include New London County,
CT, as the survey area and Windham
County, CT, as the area of application.
DATES: We must receive comments on or
before April 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments
to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy
Associate Director for Performance and
Pay Systems, Strategic Human
Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management, Room 7H31,
1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC
20415–8200; e-mail pay-performancepolicy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606–
4264.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606–2838; e-
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:05 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov;
or FAX: (202) 606–4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
is engaged in an ongoing project to
review the geographic definitions of
Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas.
OPM considers the following regulatory
criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when
defining FWS wage area boundaries:
(i) Distance, transportation facilities,
and geographic features;
(ii) Commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities in overall population,
employment, and the kinds and sizes of
private industrial establishments.
FWS wage areas in New England
differ from the majority of FWS wage
areas in that they are geographically
defined according to the boundaries of
cities and towns rather than by the
boundaries of counties. Under its
methodology for defining metropolitan
areas, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) uses counties rather than
cities and towns as the primary
geographic entities for defining
metropolitan areas in New England.
OMB uses cities and towns in New
England to define a secondary set of
metropolitan areas. Because OMB
considers its county-based metropolitan
areas the primary set of metropolitan
areas for New England, we propose to
primarily apply the county-based
metropolitan area definitions to FWS
wage area boundaries. Defining the New
England FWS wage areas by primarily
considering county boundaries will
provide greater consistency in how the
OPM defines FWS wage areas and will
improve the ability to make direct data
comparisons with Census Bureau data.
For example, some statistical programs,
such as the Census Bureau’s County
Business Patterns, provide data by
counties.
OPM recently completed reviews of
the definitions of the New HavenHartford and New London, CT, wage
areas and, based on analyses of the
regulatory criteria for defining wage
areas, is proposing the changes
described below.
Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT,
as the survey area and Fairfield,
Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland
Counties, CT, as the area of application.
The New Haven-Hartford survey area
currently includes 1 town of Fairfield
County, 15 towns of Hartford County, 2
towns of Middlesex County, and 11
towns of New Haven County. We
propose that the New Haven-Hartford
survey area be changed to include all of
Hartford and New Haven Counties. The
survey area would be conveniently
located in the central part of the wage
area and would closely reflect the
prevailing rates paid by businesses in
the wage area. Stratford town in
Fairfield County and Cromwell and
Middlefield towns in Middlesex
County, currently part of the New
Haven-Hartford survey area, would be
redefined to the New Haven-Hartford
area of application.
Hartford, Middlesex, and Tolland
Counties comprise the Hartford-West
Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan
Statistical Area (MSA). Old Saybrook
town in Middlesex County is part of the
current New London wage area. Somers
and Somersville towns in Tolland
County are part of the current Central
and Western Massachusetts wage area.
OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do
not permit splitting MSAs for the
purpose of defining a wage area, except
in very unusual circumstances (e.g.,
organizational relationships among
closely located Federal activities). OPM
proposes to redefine Old Saybrook town
in Middlesex County and Somers and
Somersville towns in Tolland County to
the New Haven-Hartford area of
application so that the entire HartfordWest Hartford-East Hartford, CT MSA is
in one wage area. No FWS employees
currently work in Middlesex or Tolland
Counties. With these changes, the New
Haven-Hartford area of application
would include all of Fairfield,
Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland
Counties.
These changes would be effective for
the full-scale wage survey in the New
Haven-Hartford wage area scheduled to
begin in April 2011.
New Haven-Hartford, CT
New London, CT
This proposed rule would define the
New London, CT, appropriated fund
FWS wage area by county rather than by
city and town boundaries. The proposed
rule would define the New London
wage area to include New London
This proposed rule would define the
New Haven-Hartford, CT, appropriated
fund FWS wage area by county rather
than by city and town boundaries. The
proposed rule would define the New
Haven-Hartford wage area to include
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Proposed Rules
County, CT, as the survey area and
Windham County, CT, as the area of
application.
The New London survey area
currently includes 28 towns of New
London County, CT, 1 town of
Middlesex County, CT, and 2 towns of
Washington County, RI. We propose
that the New London survey area be
changed to include all of New London
County.
OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do
not permit splitting Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose
of defining a wage area, except in very
unusual circumstances (e.g.,
organizational relationships among
closely located Federal activities). OPM
proposes to redefine Old Saybrook town
in Middlesex County, currently part of
the New London survey area, to the
New Haven-Hartford area of application
so the entire Hartford-West HartfordEast Hartford, CT MSA is in one wage
area. No FWS employees currently work
in Middlesex County. OPM proposes to
redefine Hopkinton and Westerly towns
in Washington County, currently part of
the New London survey area, to the
Narragansett Bay, RI, area of application
so the entire Providence-New BedfordFall River, RI-MA MSA is in one wage
area. No FWS employees currently work
in Hopkinton and Westerly towns.
These changes would be effective for
the full-scale wage survey in the New
London wage area scheduled to begin in
September 2010.
The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee (FPRAC), the national labormanagement committee that advises
OPM on FWS pay matters, reviewed and
recommended these changes by
consensus. Based on its review of the
regulatory criteria for defining FWS
wage areas, FPRAC recommended no
other changes in the geographic
definitions of the New Haven-Hartford
and New London wage areas.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Kathie Ann Whipple,
Acting Director.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
*
I certify that these regulations would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
because they would affect only Federal
agencies and employees.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and
procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:05 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of
Personnel Management is proposing to
amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532—PREVAILING RATE
SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; § 532.707
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
2. In appendix C to subpart B, the
wage area listing for the State of
Connecticut is amended by revising the
listings for New Haven-Hartford and
New London; for the State of
Massachusetts, by revising the listing for
Central and Western Massachusetts; and
for the State of Rhode Island, by revising
the listing for Narragansett Bay, to read
as follows:
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532—
Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
*
*
*
*
*
CONNECTICUT
New Haven-Hartford
Survey Area
Connecticut:
Hartford
New Haven
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Connecticut:
Fairfield
Litchfield
Middlesex
Tolland
New London
Survey Area
Connecticut:
New London
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Connecticut:
Windham
*
*
*
*
*
MASSACHUSETTS
*
*
*
*
Central and Western Massachusetts
Survey Area
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns in:
Hampden County
Agawam
Chicopee
East Longmeadow
Feeding Hills
Hampden
Holyoke
Longmeadow
Ludlow
Monson
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12281
Palmer
Southwick
Springfield
Three Rivers
Westfield
West Springfield
Wilbraham
Hampshire County
Easthampton
Granby
Hadley
Northampton
South Hadley
Worcester County
Warren
West Warren
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Massachusetts:
Berkshire
Franklin
Worcester (except Blackstone and Millville)
The following cities and towns in:
Hampshire County
Amherst
Belchertown
Chesterfield
Cummington
Goshen
Hatfield
Huntington
Middlefield
Pelham
Plainfield
Southampton
Ware
Westhampton
Williamsburg
Worthington
Hampden County
Blandford
Brimfield
Chester
Granville
Holland
Montgomery
Russell
Tolland
Wales
Middlesex County
Ashby
Shirley
Townsend
New Hampshire:
Belknap
Carroll
Cheshire
Grafton
Hillsborough
Merrimack
Sullivan
Vermont:
Addison
Bennington
Caledonia
Essex
Lamoille
Orange
Orleans
Rutland
Washington
Windham
Windsor
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
12282
*
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
RHODE ISLAND
Narragansett Bay
Survey Area
Rhode Island:
Bristol
Newport
The following cities and towns:
Kent County
Anthony
Coventry
East Greenwich
Greene
Warwick
West Warwick
Providence County
Ashton
Burrillville
Central Falls
Cranston
Cumberland
Cumberland Hill
East Providence
Esmond
Forestdale
Greenville
Harrisville
Johnston
Lincoln
Manville
Mapleville
North Providence
North Smithfield
Oakland
Pascoag
Pawtucket
Providence
Saylesville
Slatersville
Smithfield
Valley Falls
Wallum Lake
Woonsocket
Washington County
Davisville
Galilee
Lafayette
Narragansett
North Kingstown
Point Judith
Quonset Point
Saunderstown
Slocum
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns:
Bristol County
Attleboro
Fall River
North Attleboro
Rehoboth
Seekonk
Somerset
Swansea
Westport
Norfolk County
Caryville
Plainville
South Bellingham
Worcester County
Blackstone
Millville
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:05 Mar 24, 2009
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Rhode Island:
The following cities and towns in:
Kent County
West Greenwich
Providence County
Foster
Glocester
Scituate
Washington County
Charlestown
Exeter
Hopkinton
New Shoreham
Richmond
South Kingstown
Westerly
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns in:
Bristol County
Acushnet
Berkley
Dartmouth
Dighton
Fairhaven
Freetown
Mansfield
New Bedford
Norton
Raynham
Taunton
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–6364 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 150
RIN 3038–AC40
Concept Release on Whether To
Eliminate the Bona Fide Hedge
Exemption for Certain Swap Dealers
and Create a New Limited Risk
Management Exemption From
Speculative Position Limits
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for public
comment.
SUMMARY: In June and July of 2008, the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (’’Commission’’) issued a
special call for information from swap
dealers and index traders regarding their
over-the-counter (‘‘OTC’’) market
activities. In September of 2008, the
Commission released a ‘‘Staff Report on
Commodity Swap Dealers and Index
Traders with Commission
Recommendations’’ (the ‘‘September
2008 Report’’) with several preliminary
Commission recommendations.
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Recommendation five of the September
2008 Report directs the staff to develop
an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking that would review whether
to eliminate the bona fide hedge
exemption for swap dealers and replace
it with a limited risk management
exemption that is conditioned upon,
among other things, an obligation to
report to the CFTC and applicable selfregulatory organizations when certain
noncommercial swap clients reach a
certain position level and/or a
certification that none of a swap dealer’s
noncommercial swap clients exceed
specified position limits in related
exchange-regulated commodities.1
This concept release reviews the
underlying statutory and regulatory
background, as well as the regulatory
history and relevant marketplace
developments, as described in the
September 2008 Report, which led to
the foregoing recommendation. It then
poses a number of questions designed to
help inform the Commission’s decision
as to whether to proceed with the
recommendation to eliminate the bona
fide hedge exemption for swap dealers
and replace it with a conditional limited
risk management exemption; and if so,
what form the new limited risk
management exemptive rules should
take and how they might be
implemented most effectively.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments should be
submitted to David Stawick, Secretary,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581. Comments also may be sent by
facsimile to (202) 418–5521, or by
electronic mail to secretary@cftc.gov.
Reference should be made to ‘‘Whether
to Eliminate the Bona Fide Hedge
Exemption for Certain Swap Dealers and
Create a New Limited Risk Management
Exemption from Speculative Position
Limits.’’ Comments may also be
submitted by connecting to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov and following
comment submission instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donald Heitman, Senior Special
Counsel, Division of Market Oversight,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC
20581, telephone (202) 418–5041,
facsimile number (202) 418–5507,
electronic mail dheitman@cftc.gov.
1 Staff Report on Commodity Swap Dealers and
Index Traders with Commission Recommendations,
Commodity Futures Trading Commission,
September 2008, at 6.
E:\FR\FM\24MRP1.SGM
24MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12280-12282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6364]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 12280]]
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
5 CFR Part 532
RIN 3206-AL83
Prevailing Rate Systems; Redefinition of the New Haven-Hartford
and New London, CT, Appropriated Fund Federal Wage System Wage Areas
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a
proposed rule that would define the New Haven-Hartford and New London,
CT, appropriated fund Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas by county
rather than by city and town boundaries. Defining the New England FWS
wage areas by primarily considering county boundaries would provide
greater consistency in how OPM defines FWS wage areas and would improve
the ability to make direct data comparisons with Census Bureau data.
The proposed rule would define the New Haven-Hartford wage area to
include Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area and
Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the area
of application and the New London wage area to include New London
County, CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of
application.
DATES: We must receive comments on or before April 23, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to Charles D. Grimes III, Deputy
Associate Director for Performance and Pay Systems, Strategic Human
Resources Policy Division, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Room
7H31, 1900 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20415-8200; e-mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, (202) 606-2838; e-
mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Office of Personnel Management
(OPM) is engaged in an ongoing project to review the geographic
definitions of Federal Wage System (FWS) wage areas. OPM considers the
following regulatory criteria under 5 CFR 532.211 when defining FWS
wage area boundaries:
(i) Distance, transportation facilities, and geographic features;
(ii) Commuting patterns; and
(iii) Similarities in overall population, employment, and the kinds
and sizes of private industrial establishments.
FWS wage areas in New England differ from the majority of FWS wage
areas in that they are geographically defined according to the
boundaries of cities and towns rather than by the boundaries of
counties. Under its methodology for defining metropolitan areas, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) uses counties rather than cities
and towns as the primary geographic entities for defining metropolitan
areas in New England. OMB uses cities and towns in New England to
define a secondary set of metropolitan areas. Because OMB considers its
county-based metropolitan areas the primary set of metropolitan areas
for New England, we propose to primarily apply the county-based
metropolitan area definitions to FWS wage area boundaries. Defining the
New England FWS wage areas by primarily considering county boundaries
will provide greater consistency in how the OPM defines FWS wage areas
and will improve the ability to make direct data comparisons with
Census Bureau data. For example, some statistical programs, such as the
Census Bureau's County Business Patterns, provide data by counties.
OPM recently completed reviews of the definitions of the New Haven-
Hartford and New London, CT, wage areas and, based on analyses of the
regulatory criteria for defining wage areas, is proposing the changes
described below.
New Haven-Hartford, CT
This proposed rule would define the New Haven-Hartford, CT,
appropriated fund FWS wage area by county rather than by city and town
boundaries. The proposed rule would define the New Haven-Hartford wage
area to include Hartford and New Haven Counties, CT, as the survey area
and Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties, CT, as the
area of application.
The New Haven-Hartford survey area currently includes 1 town of
Fairfield County, 15 towns of Hartford County, 2 towns of Middlesex
County, and 11 towns of New Haven County. We propose that the New
Haven-Hartford survey area be changed to include all of Hartford and
New Haven Counties. The survey area would be conveniently located in
the central part of the wage area and would closely reflect the
prevailing rates paid by businesses in the wage area. Stratford town in
Fairfield County and Cromwell and Middlefield towns in Middlesex
County, currently part of the New Haven-Hartford survey area, would be
redefined to the New Haven-Hartford area of application.
Hartford, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties comprise the Hartford-
West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA).
Old Saybrook town in Middlesex County is part of the current New London
wage area. Somers and Somersville towns in Tolland County are part of
the current Central and Western Massachusetts wage area. OPM
regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting MSAs for the
purpose of defining a wage area, except in very unusual circumstances
(e.g., organizational relationships among closely located Federal
activities). OPM proposes to redefine Old Saybrook town in Middlesex
County and Somers and Somersville towns in Tolland County to the New
Haven-Hartford area of application so that the entire Hartford-West
Hartford-East Hartford, CT MSA is in one wage area. No FWS employees
currently work in Middlesex or Tolland Counties. With these changes,
the New Haven-Hartford area of application would include all of
Fairfield, Litchfield, Middlesex, and Tolland Counties.
These changes would be effective for the full-scale wage survey in
the New Haven-Hartford wage area scheduled to begin in April 2011.
New London, CT
This proposed rule would define the New London, CT, appropriated
fund FWS wage area by county rather than by city and town boundaries.
The proposed rule would define the New London wage area to include New
London
[[Page 12281]]
County, CT, as the survey area and Windham County, CT, as the area of
application.
The New London survey area currently includes 28 towns of New
London County, CT, 1 town of Middlesex County, CT, and 2 towns of
Washington County, RI. We propose that the New London survey area be
changed to include all of New London County.
OPM regulations at 5 CFR 532.211 do not permit splitting
Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) for the purpose of defining a
wage area, except in very unusual circumstances (e.g., organizational
relationships among closely located Federal activities). OPM proposes
to redefine Old Saybrook town in Middlesex County, currently part of
the New London survey area, to the New Haven-Hartford area of
application so the entire Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT MSA
is in one wage area. No FWS employees currently work in Middlesex
County. OPM proposes to redefine Hopkinton and Westerly towns in
Washington County, currently part of the New London survey area, to the
Narragansett Bay, RI, area of application so the entire Providence-New
Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA MSA is in one wage area. No FWS employees
currently work in Hopkinton and Westerly towns.
These changes would be effective for the full-scale wage survey in
the New London wage area scheduled to begin in September 2010.
The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee (FPRAC), the
national labor-management committee that advises OPM on FWS pay
matters, reviewed and recommended these changes by consensus. Based on
its review of the regulatory criteria for defining FWS wage areas,
FPRAC recommended no other changes in the geographic definitions of the
New Haven-Hartford and New London wage areas.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
I certify that these regulations would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because they
would affect only Federal agencies and employees.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 532
Administrative practice and procedure, Freedom of information,
Government employees, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wages.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Kathie Ann Whipple,
Acting Director.
Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is proposing
to amend 5 CFR part 532 as follows:
PART 532--PREVAILING RATE SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for part 532 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 5343, 5346; Sec. 532.707 also issued under
5 U.S.C. 552.
2. In appendix C to subpart B, the wage area listing for the State
of Connecticut is amended by revising the listings for New Haven-
Hartford and New London; for the State of Massachusetts, by revising
the listing for Central and Western Massachusetts; and for the State of
Rhode Island, by revising the listing for Narragansett Bay, to read as
follows:
Appendix C to Subpart B of Part 532--Appropriated Fund Wage and Survey
Areas
* * * * *
CONNECTICUT
New Haven-Hartford
Survey Area
Connecticut:
Hartford
New Haven
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Connecticut:
Fairfield
Litchfield
Middlesex
Tolland
New London
Survey Area
Connecticut:
New London
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Connecticut:
Windham
* * * * *
MASSACHUSETTS
* * * * *
Central and Western Massachusetts
Survey Area
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns in:
Hampden County
Agawam
Chicopee
East Longmeadow
Feeding Hills
Hampden
Holyoke
Longmeadow
Ludlow
Monson
Palmer
Southwick
Springfield
Three Rivers
Westfield
West Springfield
Wilbraham
Hampshire County
Easthampton
Granby
Hadley
Northampton
South Hadley
Worcester County
Warren
West Warren
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Massachusetts:
Berkshire
Franklin
Worcester (except Blackstone and Millville)
The following cities and towns in:
Hampshire County
Amherst
Belchertown
Chesterfield
Cummington
Goshen
Hatfield
Huntington
Middlefield
Pelham
Plainfield
Southampton
Ware
Westhampton
Williamsburg
Worthington
Hampden County
Blandford
Brimfield
Chester
Granville
Holland
Montgomery
Russell
Tolland
Wales
Middlesex County
Ashby
Shirley
Townsend
New Hampshire:
Belknap
Carroll
Cheshire
Grafton
Hillsborough
Merrimack
Sullivan
Vermont:
Addison
Bennington
Caledonia
Essex
Lamoille
Orange
Orleans
Rutland
Washington
Windham
Windsor
[[Page 12282]]
* * * * *
RHODE ISLAND
Narragansett Bay
Survey Area
Rhode Island:
Bristol
Newport
The following cities and towns:
Kent County
Anthony
Coventry
East Greenwich
Greene
Warwick
West Warwick
Providence County
Ashton
Burrillville
Central Falls
Cranston
Cumberland
Cumberland Hill
East Providence
Esmond
Forestdale
Greenville
Harrisville
Johnston
Lincoln
Manville
Mapleville
North Providence
North Smithfield
Oakland
Pascoag
Pawtucket
Providence
Saylesville
Slatersville
Smithfield
Valley Falls
Wallum Lake
Woonsocket
Washington County
Davisville
Galilee
Lafayette
Narragansett
North Kingstown
Point Judith
Quonset Point
Saunderstown
Slocum
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns:
Bristol County
Attleboro
Fall River
North Attleboro
Rehoboth
Seekonk
Somerset
Swansea
Westport
Norfolk County
Caryville
Plainville
South Bellingham
Worcester County
Blackstone
Millville
Area of Application. Survey area plus:
Rhode Island:
The following cities and towns in:
Kent County
West Greenwich
Providence County
Foster
Glocester
Scituate
Washington County
Charlestown
Exeter
Hopkinton
New Shoreham
Richmond
South Kingstown
Westerly
Massachusetts:
The following cities and towns in:
Bristol County
Acushnet
Berkley
Dartmouth
Dighton
Fairhaven
Freetown
Mansfield
New Bedford
Norton
Raynham
Taunton
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-6364 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-39-P