National Environmental Policy Act; Wallops Flight Facility Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program, 12387-12390 [E9-6317]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Agency: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Title: General Inquiries to State
Agency Contacts.
OMB Number: 1220–0168.
Affected Public: State, local, or Tribal
Government.
Total Respondents: 54.
Frequency: As needed.
Total Responses: 23,890.
Average Time per Response: 40
minutes.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
15,927.
Total Burden Cost (Capital/Startup):
$0.
Total Burden Cost (Operating/
Maintenance): $0.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they also
will become a matter of public record.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
March 2009.
Kimberley D. Hill,
Acting Chief, Division of Management
Systems, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
[FR Doc. E9–6341 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (09–031)]
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
National Environmental Policy Act;
Wallops Flight Facility Shoreline
Restoration and Infrastructure
Protection Program
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and to conduct scoping for the Wallops
Flight Facility Shoreline Restoration
and Infrastructure Protection Program
(SRIPP).
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act, as amended,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:06 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500–1508), and NASA’s NEPA
policy and procedures (14 CFR Part
1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA intends to
prepare an EIS for the implementation
of a long-term SRIPP at Wallops Flight
Facility (WFF). The U.S. Minerals
Management Service (MMS) and the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk
District, have been asked to participate
as Cooperating Agencies as they possess
both regulatory authority and
specialized expertise pertaining to the
Proposed Action. MMS has recently
accepted NASA’s request and will serve
as a Cooperating Agency in the
preparation of this EIS.
In May 2007, NASA released for
public comment a Draft Programmatic
Environmental Assessment for Goddard
Space Flight Center’s Wallops Flight
Facility, Shoreline Restoration and
Infrastructure Protection Program. Since
that time, NASA’s Proposed Action has
changed and NASA will now prepare an
EIS for the Proposed Action currently
under consideration.
The SRIPP would be implemented to
restore the Wallops Island shoreline and
to protect the over $800 million in
Federal and state assets on Wallops
Island that are increasingly at risk from
larger than normal storm events, storm
waves, and flooding damage. The design
and implementation of a solution to
provide Wallops Island infrastructure
with the necessary protection from both
storm energy and flooding form the
basis of the Proposed Action and
alternatives to be analyzed in the WFF
SRIPP EIS. The project’s design lifespan
would be fifty (50) years. The No Action
Alternative is to not implement the WFF
SRIPP, but to continue making
emergency repairs to the Wallops Island
shoreline as necessary.
NASA will hold a public scoping
meeting as part of the NEPA process
associated with the development of the
EIS. The public meeting location and
date identified at this time are provided
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
below.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to
submit comments on environmental
issues and concerns, preferably in
writing, on or before May 11, 2009, to
assure full consideration during the
scoping process.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted by
mail should be addressed to 250/NEPA
Manager, WFF Shoreline Restoration
and Infrastructure Protection Program,
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center’s
Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island,
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12387
Virginia 23337. Comments may be
submitted via e-mail to wff_shoreline_
eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
WFF Shoreline Restoration and
Infrastructure Protection Program EIS by
e-mail addressed to wff_shoreline_eis
@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov or by mail
addressed to 250/NEPA Manager, WFF
Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure
Protection Program, NASA Goddard
Space Flight Center’s Wallops Flight
Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia 23337.
Additional information about the WFF
Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure
Protection Program and NASA’s NEPA
process may be found on the internet at
https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/
shoreline_eis.html.
WFF is a
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
field installation located in Accomack
County on the Eastern Shore of Virginia.
As the oldest active launch range in the
continental United States and the only
range completely under NASA
management, WFF has launched over
15,000 orbital and suborbital rockets
since its operations began in the early
1940s.
WFF consists of three distinct
landmasses totaling nearly 2,630
hectares (6,500 acres)—the Main Base,
Wallops Mainland, and Wallops Island.
To meet the safety and technical
requirements of its various missions,
many of WFF’s primary launch support
facilities reside on Wallops Island
(island) which is located directly on the
Atlantic Ocean. Even prior to NASA’s
presence on the island, the landmass
has been subject to the effects of
shoreline retreat, with measured losses
averaging approximately 3.7 meters
(12.2 feet) per year since 1857. Since the
early 1960s, NASA has implemented
several shoreline protection projects on
the island that have included
construction of wooden groins
perpendicular to its shoreline,
construction of a rock armor seawall
parallel to its shoreline, and placement
of dredged material along its shorefront.
Despite these efforts, the ocean has
continued to encroach substantially
toward launch pads, infrastructure, and
test and training facilities belonging to
NASA, the U.S. Navy, and the MidAtlantic Regional Spaceport. In calendar
years 2006 and 2007, NASA prepared a
Draft SRIPP Programmatic
Environmental Assessment to assess a
wide variety of shoreline protection and
flood control measures on the island.
After receiving public comment and
carefully considering the objectives of
the project, NASA has since modified
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
12388
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
its Proposed Action and is now
preparing an EIS.
At present, the severity of the island’s
shoreline retreat could cause the
interruption of missions supported by
the facility and/or permanent loss of
capabilities. The SRIPP would help
reduce the risk to infrastructure on
Wallops Island by restoring the
shoreline or providing flood protection
for infrastructure on the island.
NASA’s Proposed Action would
involve an initial construction phase
with follow-on maintenance cycles. The
initial construction phase would
include three distinct elements:
1. Extending its existing rock seawall
a maximum of 1,372 meters (4,500 feet)
south of its southernmost point;
2. Constructing a rock groin
perpendicular to the shoreline in the
vicinity of the island’s southernmost
property boundary; and
3. Placing approximately 2,293,664
cubic meters (three (3) million cubic
yards [MCY]) of fill material dredged
from either of two shoals located
offshore in Federal waters.
The seawall extension would likely be
implemented first and would consist of
the placement of 1.8–3.6 metric ton (two
(2) to four (4) ton) rocks parallel to the
island shoreline. Groin construction
would likely follow seawall extension
and would involve the placement of
like-sized rocks perpendicular to the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:06 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
shoreline at approximately the point
where Wallops Island meets
Assawoman Island. Sand placement
would be the final stage of the project
and would likely involve removing sand
from one of two shoals by hopper
dredge and pumping the material onto
the beach. Fill placement would likely
occur in a south to north direction and
could extend as far north as 6.8
kilometers (4.2 miles). Sources of sand
under consideration are two shoals,
Blackfish Bank and an unnamed shoal,
located approximately eight (8) and
sixteen (16) kilometers (five (5) and ten
(10) miles) offshore, respectively (see
Figure).
Subsequent beach renourishment
cycles would vary throughout the
lifecycle of the Proposed Action. Factors
dictating the frequency and magnitude
of such actions would include storm
severity and frequency as well as
availability of funding. Given the
dynamic nature of the ocean
environment and that exact locations
and magnitude of renourishment cycles
may fluctuate, additional NEPA
documentation for renourishment
actions may be prepared in the future as
appropriate. For the purpose of this EIS,
the renourishment cycle is anticipated
to be 764,554 cubic meters (one (1)
MCY) every five years.
Alternatives to be considered in this
EIS will include, but not necessarily be
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
limited to construction of hard
structures only, beach fill only, and
various combinations of hard structures
and beach fill. The effects of dredging
fill material from feasible offshore
shoals will also be considered.
NASA anticipates that the areas of
potential environmental impact from
each alternative of most interest to the
public would be: The physical effects on
both the seafloor and nearby
landmasses, the effects on plants,
animals, and their habitat (including
threatened and endangered species), the
effects on commercial and recreational
fisheries, the effects on cultural and
historic resources, and the effects on
water quality.
NASA plans to hold a public meeting
to provide information on the WFF
SRIPP EIS and to solicit public
comments. The public meeting is
scheduled as follows:
—Tuesday, April 21, 2009, at the WFF
Visitor Information Center, Route 175,
Wallops Island, Virginia, 6 p.m.–9
p.m.
Written public input on alternatives
and environmental issues and concerns
associated with the WFF SRIPP that
should be addressed in the EIS are
hereby requested.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure.
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
12389
[FR Doc. E9–6317 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:06 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
EN24MR09.012
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices
12390
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Notices
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Advisory Committee for Mathematical
and Physical Sciences; Notice of
Meeting
In accordance with Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463, as
amended), the National Science
Foundation announces the following
meeting:
Name: Advisory Committee for
Mathematical and Physical Sciences (#66).
Date/Time:April 2, 2009 8:30 a.m.–6 p.m.
April 3, 2009 8:30 a.m.–3 p.m.
Place: National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230,
Room 1235.
Type of Meeting: OPEN.
Contact Person: Dr. Morris L. Aizenman,
Senior Science Associate, Directorate for
Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room
1005, National Science Foundation, 4201
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
(703) 292–8807.
Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and
recommendations concerning NSF science
and education activities within the
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical
Sciences.
Agenda: Update on current status of
Directorate. Report of Division of Physics
Committee of Visitors. Meeting of MPSAC
with Divisions within MPS Directorate.
Discussion of MPS Future Activities.
Summary Minutes: May be obtained from
the contact person listed above.
Dated: March 18, 2009.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–6316 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0131]
Biweekly Notice; Applications and
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses Involving No Significant
Hazards Considerations
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
I. Background
Pursuant to section 189a. (2) of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended
(the Act), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (the Commission or NRC
staff) is publishing this regular biweekly
notice. The Act requires the
Commission publish notice of any
amendments issued, or proposed to be
issued and grants the Commission the
authority to issue and make
immediately effective any amendment
to an operating license upon a
determination by the Commission that
such amendment involves no significant
hazards consideration, notwithstanding
VerDate Nov<24>2008
01:06 Mar 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
the pendency before the Commission of
a request for a hearing from any person.
This biweekly notice includes all
notices of amendments issued, or
proposed to be issued from February 26,
2009, through March 11, 2009. The last
biweekly notice was published on
March 10, 2009 (74 FR 10305).
Notice of Consideration of Issuance of
Amendments to Facility Operating
Licenses, Proposed No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
and Opportunity for a Hearing
The Commission has made a
proposed determination that the
following amendment requests involve
no significant hazards consideration.
Under the Commission’s regulations in
10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation
of the facility in accordance with the
proposed amendment would not (1)
involve a significant increase in the
probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or (2)
create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or (3)
involve a significant reduction in a
margin of safety. The basis for this
proposed determination for each
amendment request is shown below.
The Commission is seeking public
comments on this proposed
determination. Any comments received
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice will be
considered in making any final
determination.
Normally, the Commission will not
issue the amendment until the
expiration of 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice. The
Commission may issue the license
amendment before expiration of the 60day period provided that its final
determination is that the amendment
involves no significant hazards
consideration. In addition, the
Commission may issue the amendment
prior to the expiration of the 30-day
comment period should circumstances
change during the 30-day comment
period such that failure to act in a
timely way would result, for example in
derating or shutdown of the facility.
Should the Commission take action
prior to the expiration of either the
comment period or the notice period, it
will publish in the Federal Register a
notice of issuance. Should the
Commission make a final No Significant
Hazards Consideration Determination,
any hearing will take place after
issuance. The Commission expects that
the need to take this action will occur
very infrequently.
Written comments may be submitted
by mail to the Chief, Rulemaking,
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Directives and Editing Branch, TWB–
05–B01M, Division of Administrative
Services, Office of Administration, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, and
should cite the publication date and
page number of this Federal Register
notice. Copies of written comments
received may be examined at the
Commission’s Public Document Room
(PDR), located at One White Flint North,
Public File Area O1F21, 11555
Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville,
Maryland.
Within 60 days after the date of
publication of this notice, any person(s)
whose interest may be affected by this
action may file a request for a hearing
and a petition to intervene with respect
to issuance of the amendment to the
subject facility operating license.
Requests for a hearing and a petition for
leave to intervene shall be filed in
accordance with the Commission’s
‘‘Rules of Practice for Domestic
Licensing Proceedings’’ in 10 CFR Part
2. Interested person(s) should consult a
current copy of 10 CFR 2.309, which is
available at the Commission’s PDR,
located at One White Flint North, Public
File Area 01F21, 11555 Rockville Pike
(first floor), Rockville, Maryland.
Publicly available records will be
accessible from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System’s (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the
NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/. If a
request for a hearing or petition for
leave to intervene is filed within 60
days, the Commission or a presiding
officer designated by the Commission or
by the Chief Administrative Judge of the
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Panel, will rule on the request and/or
petition; and the Secretary or the Chief
Administrative Judge of the Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board will issue a
notice of a hearing or an appropriate
order.
As required by 10 CFR 2.309, a
petition for leave to intervene shall set
forth with particularity the interest of
the petitioner in the proceeding, and
how that interest may be affected by the
results of the proceeding. The petition
should specifically explain the reasons
why intervention should be permitted
with particular reference to the
following general requirements: (1) The
name, address, and telephone number of
the requestor or petitioner; (2) the
nature of the requestor’s/petitioner’s
right under the Act to be made a party
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12387-12390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6317]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (09-031)]
National Environmental Policy Act; Wallops Flight Facility
Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and to conduct scoping for the Wallops Flight Facility Shoreline
Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program (SRIPP).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended,
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
Parts 1500-1508), and NASA's NEPA policy and procedures (14 CFR Part
1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA intends to prepare an EIS for the
implementation of a long-term SRIPP at Wallops Flight Facility (WFF).
The U.S. Minerals Management Service (MMS) and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Norfolk District, have been asked to participate as
Cooperating Agencies as they possess both regulatory authority and
specialized expertise pertaining to the Proposed Action. MMS has
recently accepted NASA's request and will serve as a Cooperating Agency
in the preparation of this EIS.
In May 2007, NASA released for public comment a Draft Programmatic
Environmental Assessment for Goddard Space Flight Center's Wallops
Flight Facility, Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection
Program. Since that time, NASA's Proposed Action has changed and NASA
will now prepare an EIS for the Proposed Action currently under
consideration.
The SRIPP would be implemented to restore the Wallops Island
shoreline and to protect the over $800 million in Federal and state
assets on Wallops Island that are increasingly at risk from larger than
normal storm events, storm waves, and flooding damage. The design and
implementation of a solution to provide Wallops Island infrastructure
with the necessary protection from both storm energy and flooding form
the basis of the Proposed Action and alternatives to be analyzed in the
WFF SRIPP EIS. The project's design lifespan would be fifty (50) years.
The No Action Alternative is to not implement the WFF SRIPP, but to
continue making emergency repairs to the Wallops Island shoreline as
necessary.
NASA will hold a public scoping meeting as part of the NEPA process
associated with the development of the EIS. The public meeting location
and date identified at this time are provided under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION below.
DATES: Interested parties are invited to submit comments on
environmental issues and concerns, preferably in writing, on or before
May 11, 2009, to assure full consideration during the scoping process.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted by mail should be addressed to 250/NEPA
Manager, WFF Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection
Program, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's Wallops Flight Facility,
Wallops Island, Virginia 23337. Comments may be submitted via e-mail to
wff_shoreline_eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: WFF Shoreline Restoration and
Infrastructure Protection Program EIS by e-mail addressed to wff_shoreline_eis@majordomo.gsfc.nasa.gov or by mail addressed to 250/NEPA
Manager, WFF Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection
Program, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's Wallops Flight Facility,
Wallops Island, Virginia 23337. Additional information about the WFF
Shoreline Restoration and Infrastructure Protection Program and NASA's
NEPA process may be found on the internet at https://sites.wff.nasa.gov/code250/shoreline_eis.html.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: WFF is a NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
field installation located in Accomack County on the Eastern Shore of
Virginia. As the oldest active launch range in the continental United
States and the only range completely under NASA management, WFF has
launched over 15,000 orbital and suborbital rockets since its
operations began in the early 1940s.
WFF consists of three distinct landmasses totaling nearly 2,630
hectares (6,500 acres)--the Main Base, Wallops Mainland, and Wallops
Island. To meet the safety and technical requirements of its various
missions, many of WFF's primary launch support facilities reside on
Wallops Island (island) which is located directly on the Atlantic
Ocean. Even prior to NASA's presence on the island, the landmass has
been subject to the effects of shoreline retreat, with measured losses
averaging approximately 3.7 meters (12.2 feet) per year since 1857.
Since the early 1960s, NASA has implemented several shoreline
protection projects on the island that have included construction of
wooden groins perpendicular to its shoreline, construction of a rock
armor seawall parallel to its shoreline, and placement of dredged
material along its shorefront. Despite these efforts, the ocean has
continued to encroach substantially toward launch pads, infrastructure,
and test and training facilities belonging to NASA, the U.S. Navy, and
the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport. In calendar years 2006 and 2007,
NASA prepared a Draft SRIPP Programmatic Environmental Assessment to
assess a wide variety of shoreline protection and flood control
measures on the island. After receiving public comment and carefully
considering the objectives of the project, NASA has since modified
[[Page 12388]]
its Proposed Action and is now preparing an EIS.
At present, the severity of the island's shoreline retreat could
cause the interruption of missions supported by the facility and/or
permanent loss of capabilities. The SRIPP would help reduce the risk to
infrastructure on Wallops Island by restoring the shoreline or
providing flood protection for infrastructure on the island.
NASA's Proposed Action would involve an initial construction phase
with follow-on maintenance cycles. The initial construction phase would
include three distinct elements:
1. Extending its existing rock seawall a maximum of 1,372 meters
(4,500 feet) south of its southernmost point;
2. Constructing a rock groin perpendicular to the shoreline in the
vicinity of the island's southernmost property boundary; and
3. Placing approximately 2,293,664 cubic meters (three (3) million
cubic yards [MCY]) of fill material dredged from either of two shoals
located offshore in Federal waters.
The seawall extension would likely be implemented first and would
consist of the placement of 1.8-3.6 metric ton (two (2) to four (4)
ton) rocks parallel to the island shoreline. Groin construction would
likely follow seawall extension and would involve the placement of
like-sized rocks perpendicular to the shoreline at approximately the
point where Wallops Island meets Assawoman Island. Sand placement would
be the final stage of the project and would likely involve removing
sand from one of two shoals by hopper dredge and pumping the material
onto the beach. Fill placement would likely occur in a south to north
direction and could extend as far north as 6.8 kilometers (4.2 miles).
Sources of sand under consideration are two shoals, Blackfish Bank and
an unnamed shoal, located approximately eight (8) and sixteen (16)
kilometers (five (5) and ten (10) miles) offshore, respectively (see
Figure).
Subsequent beach renourishment cycles would vary throughout the
lifecycle of the Proposed Action. Factors dictating the frequency and
magnitude of such actions would include storm severity and frequency as
well as availability of funding. Given the dynamic nature of the ocean
environment and that exact locations and magnitude of renourishment
cycles may fluctuate, additional NEPA documentation for renourishment
actions may be prepared in the future as appropriate. For the purpose
of this EIS, the renourishment cycle is anticipated to be 764,554 cubic
meters (one (1) MCY) every five years.
Alternatives to be considered in this EIS will include, but not
necessarily be limited to construction of hard structures only, beach
fill only, and various combinations of hard structures and beach fill.
The effects of dredging fill material from feasible offshore shoals
will also be considered.
NASA anticipates that the areas of potential environmental impact
from each alternative of most interest to the public would be: The
physical effects on both the seafloor and nearby landmasses, the
effects on plants, animals, and their habitat (including threatened and
endangered species), the effects on commercial and recreational
fisheries, the effects on cultural and historic resources, and the
effects on water quality.
NASA plans to hold a public meeting to provide information on the
WFF SRIPP EIS and to solicit public comments. The public meeting is
scheduled as follows:
--Tuesday, April 21, 2009, at the WFF Visitor Information Center, Route
175, Wallops Island, Virginia, 6 p.m.-9 p.m.
Written public input on alternatives and environmental issues and
concerns associated with the WFF SRIPP that should be addressed in the
EIS are hereby requested.
Olga M. Dominguez,
Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure.
[[Page 12389]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN24MR09.012
[FR Doc. E9-6317 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P