Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767-200 and 767-300 Series Airplanes, 12243-12245 [E9-5961]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations approval letter must specifically reference this AD. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. Material Incorporated by Reference (i) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727–53A0223, dated March 28, 2002, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1, fax 206–766– 5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. (4) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ ibr_locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 27, 2009. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–5957 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0898; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–200–AD; Amendment 39–15856; AD 2009–06–19] mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767–200 and 767–300 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:02 Mar 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Boeing Model 767–200 and 767–300 series airplanes. This AD requires detailed inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage, mid-frequency eddy current (MFEC) and low frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections of radial web lap splices, tear strap splices, and super tear strap splices for cracking, and corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from analysis that indicates fatigue cracks of the web lap splice, tear strap splice, or super tear strap splice of the aft bulkhead are expected to occur on certain Boeing Model 767–200 and 767–300 series airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks of the aft pressure bulkhead, which could result in rapid decompression of the passenger compartment and possible damage or interference with airplane control systems that penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. DATES: This AD is effective April 28, 2009. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 28, 2009. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124– 2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1, fax 206–766–5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is the Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 12243 Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to certain Boeing Model 767–200 and 767– 300 series airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 21, 2008 (73 FR 49366). That NPRM proposed to require detailed inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage, mid-frequency eddy current (MFEC) and low frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections of radial web lap splices, tear strap splices, and super tear strap splices for cracking, and corrective actions if necessary. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the comments received. Request To Refer to AD 2003–18–10 Boeing and United Airlines ask that we refer to AD 2003–18–10, amendment 39–13301 (68 FR 53503, September 11, 2003) in the AD. Boeing states that AD 2003–18–10 requires a revision of the Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document D622T001–9 to incorporate the October 2002 revision, and Appendix B of the Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001 to incorporate the December 2002 revision, for Model 767 line numbers 1–895. Boeing adds that the inspection requirements of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, supersede the Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001– 9 and Document D622T001, Appendix B, inspections for Structural Significant Items (SSI) 53–80–I01B, C, D, and E. Boeing concludes that the NPRM affects the requirements of AD 2003–18–10 and asks that a reference to that AD be added to the ‘‘Affected ADs’’ paragraph of the NPRM. United Airlines (UAL) states that a reference to AD 2003–18–10 should be included because paragraph 1.F. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, states that the Accomplishment Instructions ‘‘are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to the inspections of SSI 53–80–I01B, C, D, and E of Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001–9 and Appendix B of Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001 as required by paragraph (d) of Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003–18– 10.’’ In addition, due to the AD-related SSIs, UAL states that the NPRM should include the SSI numbers specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1 12244 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES We do not agree that AD 2003–18–10 should be referred to in this AD. The ‘‘Affected ADs’’ paragraph is used to refer to the AD number of supersedure and revision ADs only; we consider AD 2003–18–10 a ‘‘related AD,’’ not a supersedure or revision. AD 2003–18– 10 applies to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes. That AD currently requires revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the MPD Document (767 Airworthiness Limitations Instructions (ALI)). AD 2003–18–10 also incorporates into the ALI certain inspections and compliance times to detect fatigue cracking of principal structural elements (PSEs). AD 2003–18–10 is already referred to in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, and since that service bulletin is the source of service information for accomplishing the required actions in this AD it is not necessary to refer to AD 2003–18–10 in this AD. We have made no change to the AD in this regard. Requests To Clarify the Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph Relative to AD 2003–18–10 Boeing asks that we clarify the AMOC paragraph to ensure that AMOCs for repairs are required only for the requirements of the NPRM, not the requirements of AD 2003–18–10 that are specifically superseded in paragraph 1.F. ‘‘Approval,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. Boeing states that the inspections in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, supersede the Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001–9 and Document D622T001, Appendix B, inspections for SSI 53–80–I01B, C, D, and E. Boeing adds that if cracks are found and repaired, an AMOC to the superseded inspections of AD 2003–18–10 specifically referenced in the above sentence is not required or applicable. Boeing asks that paragraph (g)(3) of the NPRM be changed to add the following: Alternative inspections for repair configurations require an AMOC to this AD only, not the requirements of AD 2003–18–10, which have been superseded by the inspection in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. This AMOC applies only to the areas inspected as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. Delta Airlines states that all repairs that would receive an AMOC to any of the repetitive inspections required by this AD (in the repaired area) should automatically be considered as having received an AMOC to the respective and VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:02 Mar 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 equivalent inspections required by AD 2003–18–10. Delta adds that this is for SSIs 53–80–I01B, C, D, and E, as specified in paragraph 1.F. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. Delta notes that the operator should not have to apply for such an AMOC. We do not agree that an AMOC is not necessary for inspection requirements in areas repaired as required by AD 2003– 18–10. The repairs required by this AD affect the ability to accomplish certain inspections required by AD 2003–18– 10, resulting in the need for an AMOC to that AD. The AMOC provided in paragraph 1.F. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, allows for only the inspections in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, to be an AMOC to certain inspections in AD 2003–18–10. That AMOC does not include approval of inspections as a separate AMOC to this AD as a result of a repair in repaired areas. However, we agree that inspections of repaired areas, if approved as an AMOC for the inspection requirements of this AD, should also be approved as an AMOC to the inspection required by AD 2003–18– 10 for the repaired areas only. Additionally, we agree that the AMOC paragraph should be clarified relative to inspections of repaired areas as required by AD 2003–18–10. We have added paragraph (g)(4) to this AD for clarification and to provide this AMOC approval. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously. This change will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD. Costs of Compliance There are about 244 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 84 airplanes of U.S. registry. The actions take about 31 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $208,320, or $2,480 per airplane, per inspection cycle. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, (2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of compliance in the AD Docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: ■ PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: ■ 2009–06–19 Boeing: Amendment 39–15856. Docket No. FAA–2008–0898; Directorate Identifier 2007–NM–200–AD. E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Effective Date (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 28, 2009. Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767– 200 and 767–300 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from analysis that indicates fatigue cracks of the web lap splice, tear strap splice, or super tear strap splice of the aft bulkhead are expected to occur on certain Boeing Model 767–200 and 767–300 series airplanes. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks of the aft pressure bulkhead, which could result in rapid decompression of the passenger compartment and possible damage or interference with airplane control systems that penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. Compliance (e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES Inspections and Applicable Related Investigative and Corrective Actions (f) Except as provided by paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD: At the applicable compliance time and repeat intervals listed in Tables 1 and 2 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, do detailed inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage, midfrequency eddy current (MFEC) and low frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections of radial web lap splices, tear strap splices, and super tear strap splices for cracking, and applicable corrective actions, by accomplishing all the applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. (1) Where Table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, specifies a compliance time after the date on that service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, specifies a compliance time of ‘‘As given by Boeing’’ or to contact Boeing for the appropriate action, this AD requires, before further flight, inspections of the area of repair and repair of any damaged/cracked part, as applicable, using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, ATTN: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington telephone VerDate Nov<24>2008 01:02 Mar 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 (425) 917–6421; fax (425) 917–6590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. (4) Inspections of repaired areas approved as an AMOC for the inspection requirements of this AD are also approved as an AMOC to the inspections for the repaired areas only as required by paragraph (d) of AD 2003–18–10. Material Incorporated by Reference (h) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1, fax 206–766– 5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. (4) You may also review copies of the service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ code_of_federal_regulations/ibr _locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 12, 2009. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–5961 Filed 3–23–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 12245 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2008–1361; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–140–AD; Amendment 39–15858; AD 2009–06–21] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC–8–102, –103, and –106 Airplanes, and Model DHC–8–200, –300, and –400 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: A fuselage spoiler cable disconnect sensing device was installed in production on later DHC–8 Series 100/200/300 aircraft, and on all DHC–8 Series 400 aircraft. On earlier DHC–8 Series 100/200/300 aircraft, its installation was mandated by [Canadian] Airworthiness Directive CF–2006–13 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2007–21–16]. However, several incorrectly assembled spoiler cable disconnect sensing devices have recently been discovered on in-service aircraft. A pulley and plastic spacer had been inadvertently interchanged during assembly of the device in production, resulting in the spoiler cable sliding on the spacer rather than on the pulley, as designed. Continued operation with an incorrectly assembled spoiler cable disconnect sensing device could result in impaired operation of the sensing device and/or an eventual fuselage spoiler cable disconnect, with possible reduced controllability of the aircraft. We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: This AD becomes effective April 28, 2009. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 28, 2009. ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC. E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM 24MRR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12243-12245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5961]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0898; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-200-AD; 
Amendment 39-15856; AD 2009-06-19]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767-200 and 767-300 Series 
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 
Boeing Model 767-200 and 767-300 series airplanes. This AD requires 
detailed inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage, mid-
frequency eddy current (MFEC) and low frequency eddy current (LFEC) 
inspections of radial web lap splices, tear strap splices, and super 
tear strap splices for cracking, and corrective actions if necessary. 
This AD results from analysis that indicates fatigue cracks of the web 
lap splice, tear strap splice, or super tear strap splice of the aft 
bulkhead are expected to occur on certain Boeing Model 767-200 and 767-
300 series airplanes. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct 
fatigue cracks of the aft pressure bulkhead, which could result in 
rapid decompression of the passenger compartment and possible damage or 
interference with airplane control systems that penetrate the bulkhead, 
and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective April 28, 2009.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by 
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 28, 
2009.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 206-
544-5000, extension 1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail me.boecom@boeing.com; 
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, 
any comments received, and other information. The address for the 
Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is the Document Management 
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace 
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone (425) 917-6421; fax (425) 917-6590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to 
certain Boeing Model 767-200 and 767-300 series airplanes. That NPRM 
was published in the Federal Register on August 21, 2008 (73 FR 49366). 
That NPRM proposed to require detailed inspections of the aft pressure 
bulkhead for damage, mid-frequency eddy current (MFEC) and low 
frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspections of radial web lap splices, 
tear strap splices, and super tear strap splices for cracking, and 
corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing 
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Request To Refer to AD 2003-18-10

    Boeing and United Airlines ask that we refer to AD 2003-18-10, 
amendment 39-13301 (68 FR 53503, September 11, 2003) in the AD.
    Boeing states that AD 2003-18-10 requires a revision of the Boeing 
767 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document D622T001-9 to incorporate 
the October 2002 revision, and Appendix B of the Boeing 767 MPD 
Document D622T001 to incorporate the December 2002 revision, for Model 
767 line numbers 1-895. Boeing adds that the inspection requirements of 
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, 
supersede the Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001-9 and Document D622T001, 
Appendix B, inspections for Structural Significant Items (SSI) 53-80-
I01B, C, D, and E. Boeing concludes that the NPRM affects the 
requirements of AD 2003-18-10 and asks that a reference to that AD be 
added to the ``Affected ADs'' paragraph of the NPRM.
    United Airlines (UAL) states that a reference to AD 2003-18-10 
should be included because paragraph 1.F. of Boeing Alert Service 
Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, states that the 
Accomplishment Instructions ``are approved as an alternative method of 
compliance (AMOC) to the inspections of SSI 53-80-I01B, C, D, and E of 
Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001-9 and Appendix B of Boeing 767 MPD 
Document D622T001 as required by paragraph (d) of Airworthiness 
Directive (AD) 2003-18-10.'' In addition, due to the AD-related SSIs, 

UAL states that the NPRM should include the SSI numbers specified in 
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007.

[[Page 12244]]

    We do not agree that AD 2003-18-10 should be referred to in this 
AD. The ``Affected ADs'' paragraph is used to refer to the AD number of 
supersedure and revision ADs only; we consider AD 2003-18-10 a 
``related AD,'' not a supersedure or revision. AD 2003-18-10 applies to 
certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes. That AD currently requires 
revising the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the MPD Document (767 
Airworthiness Limitations Instructions (ALI)). AD 2003-18-10 also 
incorporates into the ALI certain inspections and compliance times to 
detect fatigue cracking of principal structural elements (PSEs). AD 
2003-18-10 is already referred to in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-
53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, and since that service bulletin is the 
source of service information for accomplishing the required actions in 
this AD it is not necessary to refer to AD 2003-18-10 in this AD. We 
have made no change to the AD in this regard.

Requests To Clarify the Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) 
Paragraph Relative to AD 2003-18-10

    Boeing asks that we clarify the AMOC paragraph to ensure that AMOCs 
for repairs are required only for the requirements of the NPRM, not the 
requirements of AD 2003-18-10 that are specifically superseded in 
paragraph 1.F. ``Approval,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-
53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. Boeing states that the inspections in 
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, 
supersede the Boeing 767 MPD Document D622T001-9 and Document D622T001, 
Appendix B, inspections for SSI 53-80-I01B, C, D, and E. Boeing adds 
that if cracks are found and repaired, an AMOC to the superseded 
inspections of AD 2003-18-10 specifically referenced in the above 
sentence is not required or applicable. Boeing asks that paragraph 
(g)(3) of the NPRM be changed to add the following: Alternative 
inspections for repair configurations require an AMOC to this AD only, 
not the requirements of AD 2003-18-10, which have been superseded by 
the inspection in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated 
August 16, 2007. This AMOC applies only to the areas inspected as 
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 
16, 2007.
    Delta Airlines states that all repairs that would receive an AMOC 
to any of the repetitive inspections required by this AD (in the 
repaired area) should automatically be considered as having received an 
AMOC to the respective and equivalent inspections required by AD 2003-
18-10. Delta adds that this is for SSIs 53-80-I01B, C, D, and E, as 
specified in paragraph 1.F. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-
53A0147, dated August 16, 2007. Delta notes that the operator should 
not have to apply for such an AMOC.
    We do not agree that an AMOC is not necessary for inspection 
requirements in areas repaired as required by AD 2003-18-10. The 
repairs required by this AD affect the ability to accomplish certain 
inspections required by AD 2003-18-10, resulting in the need for an 
AMOC to that AD. The AMOC provided in paragraph 1.F. of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, allows for only 
the inspections in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated 
August 16, 2007, to be an AMOC to certain inspections in AD 2003-18-10. 
That AMOC does not include approval of inspections as a separate AMOC 
to this AD as a result of a repair in repaired areas. However, we agree 
that inspections of repaired areas, if approved as an AMOC for the 
inspection requirements of this AD, should also be approved as an AMOC 
to the inspection required by AD 2003-18-10 for the repaired areas 
only. Additionally, we agree that the AMOC paragraph should be 
clarified relative to inspections of repaired areas as required by AD 
2003-18-10. We have added paragraph (g)(4) to this AD for clarification 
and to provide this AMOC approval.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, 
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting 
the AD with the change described previously. This change will neither 
increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 244 airplanes of the affected design in the 
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 84 airplanes of U.S. registry. 
The actions take about 31 work hours per airplane, at an average labor 
rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost 
of the AD for U.S. operators is $208,320, or $2,480 per airplane, per 
inspection cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation 
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's 
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, 
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various 
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive 
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of 
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, 
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2009-06-19 Boeing: Amendment 39-15856. Docket No. FAA-2008-0898; 
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-200-AD.

[[Page 12245]]

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 28, 
2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767-200 and 767-300 series 
airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from analysis that indicates fatigue cracks 
of the web lap splice, tear strap splice, or super tear strap splice 
of the aft bulkhead are expected to occur on certain Boeing Model 
767-200 and 767-300 series airplanes. We are proposing this AD to 
detect and correct fatigue cracks of the aft pressure bulkhead, 
which could result in rapid decompression of the passenger 
compartment and possible damage or interference with airplane 
control systems that penetrate the bulkhead, and consequent loss of 
controllability of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, 
unless already done.

Inspections and Applicable Related Investigative and Corrective Actions

    (f) Except as provided by paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this 
AD: At the applicable compliance time and repeat intervals listed in 
Tables 1 and 2 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert 
Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, do detailed 
inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for damage, mid-frequency 
eddy current (MFEC) and low frequency eddy current (LFEC) 
inspections of radial web lap splices, tear strap splices, and super 
tear strap splices for cracking, and applicable corrective actions, 
by accomplishing all the applicable actions specified in the 
Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin.
    (1) Where Table 1 of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing 
Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated August 16, 2007, specifies 
a compliance time after the date on that service bulletin, this AD 
requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the 
effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, dated 
August 16, 2007, specifies a compliance time of ``As given by 
Boeing'' or to contact Boeing for the appropriate action, this AD 
requires, before further flight, inspections of the area of repair 
and repair of any damaged/cracked part, as applicable, using a 
method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in 
paragraph (g) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 
FAA, ATTN: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, 
ANM-120S, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington telephone (425) 
917-6421; fax (425) 917-6590; has the authority to approve AMOCs for 
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different 
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19. 
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA 
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 
FSDO.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an 
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes 
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized 
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis 
of the airplane and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Inspections of repaired areas approved as an AMOC for the 
inspection requirements of this AD are also approved as an AMOC to 
the inspections for the repaired areas only as required by paragraph 
(d) of AD 2003-18-10.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (h) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-53A0147, 
dated August 16, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless 
the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the 
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5 
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact 
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, 
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207; telephone 
206-544-5000, extension 1, fax 206-766-5680; e-mail 
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA, 
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at 
the FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that 
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records 
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this 
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 12, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-5961 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.