Capital Adequacy Guidelines: Trust Preferred Securities and the Definition of Capital; Delay of Implementation Date, 12076-12078 [E9-6096]
Download as PDF
12076
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 54 / Monday, March 23, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Metal halide lamp fixture means a
light fixture for general lighting
application designed to be operated
with a metal halide lamp and a ballast
for a metal halide lamp.
Probe-start metal halide ballast means
a ballast that starts a probe-start metal
halide lamp that contains a third
starting electrode (probe) in the arc tube,
and does not generally contain an
igniter but instead starts lamps with
high ballast open circuit voltage.
Pulse-start metal halide ballast means
an electronic or electromagnetic ballast
that starts a pulse-start metal halide
lamp with high voltage pulses, where
lamps shall be started by the ballast first
providing a high voltage pulse for
ionization of the gas to produce a glow
discharge and then power to sustain the
discharge through the glow-to-arc
transition.
Test Procedures
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
§ 431.323 Materials incorporated by
reference.
(a) General. We incorporate by
reference the following standards into
Subpart S of Part 431. The material
listed has been approved for
incorporation by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. Any subsequent
amendment to a standard by the
standard-setting organization will not
affect the DOE regulations unless and
until amended by DOE. Material is
incorporated as it exists on the date of
the approval and a notice of any change
in the material will be published in the
Federal Register. All approved material
is available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030 or
go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html. Also, this material is
available for inspection at U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
Building Technologies Program, 6th
Floor, 950 L’Enfant Plaza, SW.,
Washington, DC 20024, 202–586–2945,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
or go to: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/
buildings/appliance_standards/.
Standards can be obtained from the
sources listed below.
(b) ANSI. American National
Standards Institute, 25 W. 43rd Street,
4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, 212–
642–4900, or go to https://www.ansi.org.
(1) ANSI C78.43–2004, Revision and
consolidation of ANSI C78.1372–1997,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Mar 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
.1374–1997, .1375–1997, .1376–1997,
.1377–1997, .1378–1997, .1379–1997,
.1382–1997, .1384–1997, and .1650–
2003 (‘‘ANSI C78.43’’), American
National Standard for electric lamps:
Single-Ended Metal Halide Lamps,
approved May 5, 2004, IBR approved for
§ 431.322;
(2) ANSI C82.6–2005, Proposed
Revision of ANSI C82.6–1985 (‘‘ANSI
C82.6’’), American National Standard
for Lamp Ballasts—Ballasts for HighIntensity Discharge Lamps—Methods of
Measurement, approved February 14,
2005, IBR approved for § 431.322;
(c) NFPA. National Fire Protection
Association, 11 Tracy Drive, Avon, MA
02322, 1–800–344–3555, or go to https://
www.nfpa.org;
(1) NFPA 70–2002 (‘‘NFPA 70’’),
National Electrical Code 2002 Edition,
IBR approved for § 431.326;
(2) [Reserved].
(e) UL. Underwriters Laboratories,
Inc., COMM 2000, 1414 Brook Drive,
Downers Grove, IL 60515, 1–888–853–
3503, or go to https://www.ul.com.
(1) UL 1029 (ANSI/UL 1029–2007)
(‘‘UL 1029’’), Standard for Safety HighIntensity-Discharge Lamp Ballasts, 5th
edition, May 25, 1994, which consists of
pages dated May 25, 1994, September
28, 1995, August 3, 1998, February 7,
2001 and December 11, 2007, IBR
approved for § 431.326.
(2) [Reserved].
§ 431.324 Uniform test method for the
measurement of energy efficiency of metal
halide ballasts.
(a) Scope. This section provides test
procedures for measuring, pursuant to
EPCA, the energy efficiency of metal
halide ballasts.
(b) Testing and Calculations.
[Reserved]
Energy Conservation Standards
§ 431.326 Energy conservation standards
and their effective dates.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, each metal halide
lamp fixture manufactured on or after
January 1, 2009, and designed to be
operated with lamps rated greater than
or equal to 150 watts but less than or
equal to 500 watts shall contain—
(1) A pulse-start metal halide ballast
with a minimum ballast efficiency of 88
percent;
(2) A magnetic probe-start ballast with
a minimum ballast efficiency of 94
percent; or
(3) A nonpulse-start electronic ballast
with either a minimum ballast
efficiency of 92 percent for wattages
greater than 250 watts; or a minimum
ballast efficiency of 90 percent for
wattages less than or equal to 250 watts.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(b) The standards described in
paragraph (a) of this section do not
apply to—
(1) Metal halide lamp fixtures with
regulated lag ballasts;
(2) Metal halide lamp fixtures that use
electronic ballasts that operate at 480
volts; or
(3) Metal halide lamp fixtures that;
(i) Are rated only for 150 watt lamps;
(ii) Are rated for use in wet locations;
as specified by the National Fire
Protection Association in NFPA 70
(incorporated by reference; see
§ 431.323); and
(iii) Contain a ballast that is rated to
operate at ambient air temperatures
above 50°C, as specified in UL 1029,
(incorporated by reference; see
§ 431.323).
[FR Doc. E9–5935 Filed 3–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 225
[Regulation Y; Docket No. R–1193]
Capital Adequacy Guidelines: Trust
Preferred Securities and the Definition
of Capital; Delay of Implementation
Date
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This final rule delays the
March 31, 2009, implementation date
for certain amendments to the Board’s
capital adequacy guidelines for bank
holding companies on trust preferred
securities and the definition of capital
published by the Board in the Federal
Register on March 10, 2005. Due to the
continuing stressed conditions in the
financial markets and in order to
promote stability in the financial
markets and the banking industry as a
whole, the Board has decided to delay
until March 31, 2011, the
implementation date of new
requirements that: limit the aggregate
amount of cumulative perpetual
preferred stock, trust preferred
securities, and minority interests in the
equity accounts of most consolidated
subsidiaries (collectively, restricted core
capital elements) included in the tier 1
capital of all bank holding companies;
require bank holding companies to
deduct goodwill, less any associated
deferred tax liability, from the sum of
core capital elements in calculating the
amount of restricted core capital
elements that may be included in tier 1
capital; and impose further limits on the
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 54 / Monday, March 23, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
amount of restricted core capital
elements that internationally active
bank holding companies may include in
tier 1 capital.
DATES: This amendment is effective
March 23, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norah M. Barger, Deputy Director, (202)
452–2402, or John Connolly, Senior
Project Manager, (202) 452–3621,
Division of Banking Supervision and
Regulation; or April C. Snyder, Counsel,
(202) 452–3099, Benjamin W.
McDonough, Senior Attorney, (202)
452–2036, or Kathleen M. O’Day,
Deputy General Counsel, (202) 452–
3786, Legal Division; Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, 20th Street and Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20551. For
the hearing impaired only,
Telecommunication Device for the Deaf
(TDD), (202) 263–4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 10, 2005, the Board
published in the Federal Register (70
FR 11827) a final rule (final rule)
amending its risk-based capital
standards for bank holding companies
(BHCs) (1) to allow the continued
inclusion of outstanding and
prospective issuances of trust preferred
securities in the tier 1 capital of BHCs,
subject to stricter requirements,1 and (2)
to revise the requirements generally
applied to the aggregate amount of
restricted core capital elements
(including trust preferred securities)
included in the tier 1 capital of BHCs.2
These new limits on trust preferred
securities and other restricted core
capital elements (new limits) were
scheduled to become effective on March
31, 2009. As noted in the preamble to
the final rule, the Board adopted the
final rule to address supervisory
concerns, competitive equity
considerations, and changes in generally
accepted accounting principles and to
strengthen the definition of regulatory
capital for BHCs.3
Under limits on restricted core capital
elements that are currently in effect, a
BHC generally may include in tier 1
capital cumulative perpetual preferred
stock and trust preferred securities up to
25 percent of the sum of core capital
elements (including cumulative
perpetual preferred stock and trust
preferred securities).4 The new limits
1 70
FR 11827 (March 10, 2005).
12 CFR part 225, Appendix A, sections
II.A.1.b.i and II.A.2.d.iv.
3 70 FR 11827 (March 10, 2005).
4 In addition, on October 22, 2008, the Board
issued an interim final rule that allows BHCs to
2 See
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Mar 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
would limit restricted core capital
elements includable in the tier 1 capital
of a BHC to 25 percent of the sum of
core capital elements (including
restricted core capital elements), net of
goodwill less any associated deferred
tax liability. In addition, internationally
active BHCs would be subject to a
further limitation.5 In particular, the
amount of restricted core capital
elements (other than qualifying
mandatory convertible preferred
securities) that an internationally active
BHC could include in tier 1 capital
could not exceed 15 percent of the sum
of core capital elements (including
restricted core capital elements), net of
goodwill less any associated deferred
tax liability.6
II. Postponement of the Implementation
Date
On May 19, 2004, the Board issued a
notice of proposed rulemaking
(proposed rule) under which the new
limits would have come into force on
March 31, 2007.7 Several commenters to
the proposed rule asked the Board to
extend the transition period for
compliance with the new limits.8 These
commenters noted that an extended
transition period would allow affected
BHCs substantially more flexibility in
managing their compliance with the
new limits through a combination of
redeeming outstanding trust preferred
securities with expired no-call periods
and generating capital internally
through the retention of earnings.9 For
these reasons, and consistent with
comments received, in the final rule the
Board established an implementation
date for the new limits of March 31,
2009, to allow BHCs to transition to the
new limits.
In light of conditions in the capital
markets, the Board has considered
whether an additional extension of the
implementation date of the new limits
is appropriate. The economic conditions
for the past 18 months, and currently,
have created a situation in which
include new senior perpetual preferred securities
issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) under the capital purchase program
announced by the Secretary of the Treasury on
October 14, 2008, in tier 1 capital without limit. 73
FR 62851 (October 22, 2008).
5 An internationally active BHC is defined as a
BHC that (1) as of its most recent year-end FR Y–
9C reports total consolidated assets equal to $250
billion or more or (2) on a consolidated basis,
reports total on-balance-sheet foreign exposure of
$10 billion or more on its filings of the most recent
year-end FFIEC 009 Country Exposure Report. See
12 CFR part 225, appendix A, section II.A.1.b.i.(2)
at n. 6.
6 See 70 FR 11830.
7 See 69 FR 28851 (May 19, 2004).
8 70 FR 11832.
9 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12077
requiring adherence to the new limits by
the March 31, 2009, implementation
date creates a substantial burden for
many BHCs in a way that was not
anticipated when the final rule was
adopted in 2005. In the prevailing
market conditions, it is especially
important for BHCs to expend efforts to
increase their overall capital levels,
although it is challenging to do so now
through retention of earnings, the most
typical means. Therefore, to promote
stability in the financial markets and the
banking industry as a whole, the Board
has decided to further delay the
implementation date of the new limits
until March 31, 2011. The Board
believes that this extended transition
period would allow affected BHCs
sufficient flexibility to satisfy the
Board’s risk-based and leverage capital
guidelines during the current stressed
market conditions.10
The Board notes that the new limits
apply only to regulatory capital
calculations and do not affect the ability
of restricted core capital instruments to
absorb losses. However, as a general
matter and in light of the Board’s
continuing interest in assuring the
appropriate regulatory capital treatment
of trust preferred securities (and other
restricted core capital elements),
institutions that intend to issue new
restricted core capital instruments
should consult with appropriate Reserve
Bank and Board staff prior to issuance.
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to sections 553(b) and (d) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
(5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (d)), the Board
finds that there is good cause for
delaying the implementation date of the
final rule, and that it is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest to issue a notice of proposed
rulemaking and provide an opportunity
to comment before the implementation
date. The Board has adopted the rule in
light of, and to help address, the
potential adverse effects of imposing
new regulatory capital restrictions, the
continuing stressed market conditions,
and BHCs’ efforts to increase their
overall capital levels. Because the
implementation date of the final rule
(March 31, 2009) is imminent, it is
impracticable to seek further public
comment before issuing this amendment
to the final rule delaying the
implementation date of the new limits.
In addition, the delay will further the
Board’s efforts, as well as the efforts of
10 With respect to the Board’s first quarter 2009
regulatory reports, the Board will provide
supplemental instructions to BHCs on how to report
overages in their restricted core capital elements.
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
12078
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 54 / Monday, March 23, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the other Federal banking agencies and
Treasury, to respond to the current
financial situation.
Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Authority and Issuance
Under section 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 604), a
final regulatory flexibility analysis is
required only for notice-and-comment
rulemakings conducted under section
553 of the APA. Since the Board finds
that there is ‘‘good cause’’ under the
APA for not proceeding with noticeand-comment rulemaking for this
amendment to the implementation date
for the final rule, the RFA does not
require that a final regulatory flexibility
analysis be provided for this
amendment.
The Board provided regulatory
flexibility analysis in the preamble to
the final rule published on March 10,
2005 (70 FR 11827–11838). In that
regulatory flexibility analysis, the Board
considered the likely impact of the final
rule on small entities and determined
that the final rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
■
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3506), the Board has
reviewed this rule to assess any
information collections. There are no
collections of information as defined by
the Paperwork Reduction Act in this
rule.
Solicitation of Comments on Use of
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, Public Law 106–102,
requires the Federal banking agencies to
use plain language in all proposed and
final rules published after January 1,
2000. The Board invited comment on
how to make the final rule easier to
understand.11 No commenter indicated
that the proposed rule should be revised
to make it easier to understand. In the
preamble to the final rule the Board
indicated that it believes the final rule
is written plainly and clearly.12
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 225
Administrative Practice and
Procedure, Banks, Banking, Federal
Reserve System, Holding companies,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Securities.
11 69
12 70
FR 28856 (May 19, 2004).
FR 11834 (March 10, 2005).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 Mar 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
12 CFR Chapter II
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System amends part 225 of
chapter II of title 12 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 225—BANK HOLDING
COMPANIES AND CHANGE IN BANK
CONTROL (REGULATION Y)
1. The authority citation for part 225
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(13), 1818,
1828(o), 1831i, 1831p–1, 1843(c)(8), 1844(b),
1972(1), 3106, 3108, 3310, 3331–3351, 3907,
and 3909; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and 6805.
Appendix A to Part 225 [Amended]
2. In Appendix A to part 225,
paragraphs II.A.1.b.ii. and II.A.2.d.iv.
are amended by removing ‘‘2009’’ and
adding ‘‘2011’’ in its place wherever it
appears.
■
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, March 16, 2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9–6096 Filed 3–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–02–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 370
RIN 3064–AD37
Amendment of the Temporary Liquidity
Guarantee Program To Extend the
Debt Guarantee Program and To
Impose Surcharges on Assessments
for Certain Debt Issued on or After
April 1, 2009
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Interim Rule with request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FDIC is issuing this
Interim Rule to amend the Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) by
providing a limited extension of the
Debt Guarantee Program (DGP) for
insured depository institutions (IDIs)
participating in the DGP. The extended
DGP also would apply to other
participating entities; however, other
participating entities that have not
issued FDIC-guaranteed debt before
April 1, 2009 are required to submit an
application to and obtain approval from
the FDIC to participate in the extended
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DGP. The Interim Rule imposes
surcharges on certain debt issued on or
after April 1, 2009. Any surcharge
collected will be deposited into the
Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF or Fund).
The Interim Rule also establishes an
application process whereby entities
participating in the extended DGP may
apply to issue non-FDIC-guaranteed
debt during the extension period.
DATES: The Interim Rule becomes
effective on March 23, 2009. Comments
on the Interim Rule must be received by
April 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the Interim Rule by any of the
following methods:
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.FDIC.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/notices.html. Follow
instructions for submitting comments
on the Agency Web Site.
• E-mail: Comments@FDIC.gov.
Include RIN # 3064–AD37 on the
subject line of the message.
• Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429.
• Hand Delivery: Comments may be
hand delivered to the guard station at
the rear of the 550 17th Street Building
(located on F Street) on business days
between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Instructions: All comments received
will be posted generally without change
to https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/propose.html, including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark L. Handzlik, Senior Attorney,
Legal Division, (202) 898–3990 or
mhandzlik@fdic.gov; Robert C. Fick,
Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 898–8962
or rfick@fdic.gov; A. Ann Johnson,
Counsel, Legal Division, (202) 898–3573
or aajohnson@fdic.gov; (for questions or
comments related to applications) Lisa
D Arquette, Associate Director, Division
of Supervision and Consumer
Protection, (202) 898–8633 or
larquette@fdic.gov; Serena L. Owens,
Associate Director, Supervision and
Applications Branch, Division of
Supervision and Consumer Protection,
(202) 898–8996 or sowens@fdic.gov; Gail
Patelunas, Deputy Director, Division of
Resolutions and Receiverships, (202)
898–6779 or gpatelunas@fdic.gov;
Donna Saulnier, Manager, Assessment
Policy Section, Division of Finance,
(703) 562–6167 or dsaulnier@fdic.gov;
or Munsell St. Clair, Chief, Bank and
Regulatory Policy Section, Division of
Insurance and Research, (202) 898–8967
or mstclair@fdic.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 54 (Monday, March 23, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12076-12078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-6096]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
12 CFR Part 225
[Regulation Y; Docket No. R-1193]
Capital Adequacy Guidelines: Trust Preferred Securities and the
Definition of Capital; Delay of Implementation Date
AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule delays the March 31, 2009, implementation date
for certain amendments to the Board's capital adequacy guidelines for
bank holding companies on trust preferred securities and the definition
of capital published by the Board in the Federal Register on March 10,
2005. Due to the continuing stressed conditions in the financial
markets and in order to promote stability in the financial markets and
the banking industry as a whole, the Board has decided to delay until
March 31, 2011, the implementation date of new requirements that: limit
the aggregate amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, trust
preferred securities, and minority interests in the equity accounts of
most consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, restricted core capital
elements) included in the tier 1 capital of all bank holding companies;
require bank holding companies to deduct goodwill, less any associated
deferred tax liability, from the sum of core capital elements in
calculating the amount of restricted core capital elements that may be
included in tier 1 capital; and impose further limits on the
[[Page 12077]]
amount of restricted core capital elements that internationally active
bank holding companies may include in tier 1 capital.
DATES: This amendment is effective March 23, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norah M. Barger, Deputy Director,
(202) 452-2402, or John Connolly, Senior Project Manager, (202) 452-
3621, Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation; or April C.
Snyder, Counsel, (202) 452-3099, Benjamin W. McDonough, Senior
Attorney, (202) 452-2036, or Kathleen M. O'Day, Deputy General Counsel,
(202) 452-3786, Legal Division; Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 20th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20551. For the hearing impaired only, Telecommunication Device for the
Deaf (TDD), (202) 263-4869.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 10, 2005, the Board published in the Federal Register (70
FR 11827) a final rule (final rule) amending its risk-based capital
standards for bank holding companies (BHCs) (1) to allow the continued
inclusion of outstanding and prospective issuances of trust preferred
securities in the tier 1 capital of BHCs, subject to stricter
requirements,\1\ and (2) to revise the requirements generally applied
to the aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements (including
trust preferred securities) included in the tier 1 capital of BHCs.\2\
These new limits on trust preferred securities and other restricted
core capital elements (new limits) were scheduled to become effective
on March 31, 2009. As noted in the preamble to the final rule, the
Board adopted the final rule to address supervisory concerns,
competitive equity considerations, and changes in generally accepted
accounting principles and to strengthen the definition of regulatory
capital for BHCs.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 70 FR 11827 (March 10, 2005).
\2\ See 12 CFR part 225, Appendix A, sections II.A.1.b.i and
II.A.2.d.iv.
\3\ 70 FR 11827 (March 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under limits on restricted core capital elements that are currently
in effect, a BHC generally may include in tier 1 capital cumulative
perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities up to 25
percent of the sum of core capital elements (including cumulative
perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities).\4\ The new
limits would limit restricted core capital elements includable in the
tier 1 capital of a BHC to 25 percent of the sum of core capital
elements (including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill
less any associated deferred tax liability. In addition,
internationally active BHCs would be subject to a further
limitation.\5\ In particular, the amount of restricted core capital
elements (other than qualifying mandatory convertible preferred
securities) that an internationally active BHC could include in tier 1
capital could not exceed 15 percent of the sum of core capital elements
(including restricted core capital elements), net of goodwill less any
associated deferred tax liability.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In addition, on October 22, 2008, the Board issued an
interim final rule that allows BHCs to include new senior perpetual
preferred securities issued to the U.S. Department of the Treasury
(Treasury) under the capital purchase program announced by the
Secretary of the Treasury on October 14, 2008, in tier 1 capital
without limit. 73 FR 62851 (October 22, 2008).
\5\ An internationally active BHC is defined as a BHC that (1)
as of its most recent year-end FR Y-9C reports total consolidated
assets equal to $250 billion or more or (2) on a consolidated basis,
reports total on-balance-sheet foreign exposure of $10 billion or
more on its filings of the most recent year-end FFIEC 009 Country
Exposure Report. See 12 CFR part 225, appendix A, section
II.A.1.b.i.(2) at n. 6.
\6\ See 70 FR 11830.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Postponement of the Implementation Date
On May 19, 2004, the Board issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
(proposed rule) under which the new limits would have come into force
on March 31, 2007.\7\ Several commenters to the proposed rule asked the
Board to extend the transition period for compliance with the new
limits.\8\ These commenters noted that an extended transition period
would allow affected BHCs substantially more flexibility in managing
their compliance with the new limits through a combination of redeeming
outstanding trust preferred securities with expired no-call periods and
generating capital internally through the retention of earnings.\9\ For
these reasons, and consistent with comments received, in the final rule
the Board established an implementation date for the new limits of
March 31, 2009, to allow BHCs to transition to the new limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 69 FR 28851 (May 19, 2004).
\8\ 70 FR 11832.
\9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In light of conditions in the capital markets, the Board has
considered whether an additional extension of the implementation date
of the new limits is appropriate. The economic conditions for the past
18 months, and currently, have created a situation in which requiring
adherence to the new limits by the March 31, 2009, implementation date
creates a substantial burden for many BHCs in a way that was not
anticipated when the final rule was adopted in 2005. In the prevailing
market conditions, it is especially important for BHCs to expend
efforts to increase their overall capital levels, although it is
challenging to do so now through retention of earnings, the most
typical means. Therefore, to promote stability in the financial markets
and the banking industry as a whole, the Board has decided to further
delay the implementation date of the new limits until March 31, 2011.
The Board believes that this extended transition period would allow
affected BHCs sufficient flexibility to satisfy the Board's risk-based
and leverage capital guidelines during the current stressed market
conditions.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ With respect to the Board's first quarter 2009 regulatory
reports, the Board will provide supplemental instructions to BHCs on
how to report overages in their restricted core capital elements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board notes that the new limits apply only to regulatory
capital calculations and do not affect the ability of restricted core
capital instruments to absorb losses. However, as a general matter and
in light of the Board's continuing interest in assuring the appropriate
regulatory capital treatment of trust preferred securities (and other
restricted core capital elements), institutions that intend to issue
new restricted core capital instruments should consult with appropriate
Reserve Bank and Board staff prior to issuance.
Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to sections 553(b) and (d) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (d)), the Board finds that there is good
cause for delaying the implementation date of the final rule, and that
it is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest to
issue a notice of proposed rulemaking and provide an opportunity to
comment before the implementation date. The Board has adopted the rule
in light of, and to help address, the potential adverse effects of
imposing new regulatory capital restrictions, the continuing stressed
market conditions, and BHCs' efforts to increase their overall capital
levels. Because the implementation date of the final rule (March 31,
2009) is imminent, it is impracticable to seek further public comment
before issuing this amendment to the final rule delaying the
implementation date of the new limits. In addition, the delay will
further the Board's efforts, as well as the efforts of
[[Page 12078]]
the other Federal banking agencies and Treasury, to respond to the
current financial situation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C.
604), a final regulatory flexibility analysis is required only for
notice-and-comment rulemakings conducted under section 553 of the APA.
Since the Board finds that there is ``good cause'' under the APA for
not proceeding with notice-and-comment rulemaking for this amendment to
the implementation date for the final rule, the RFA does not require
that a final regulatory flexibility analysis be provided for this
amendment.
The Board provided regulatory flexibility analysis in the preamble
to the final rule published on March 10, 2005 (70 FR 11827-11838). In
that regulatory flexibility analysis, the Board considered the likely
impact of the final rule on small entities and determined that the
final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number
of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506), the Board has reviewed this rule to assess
any information collections. There are no collections of information as
defined by the Paperwork Reduction Act in this rule.
Solicitation of Comments on Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Public Law 106-102,
requires the Federal banking agencies to use plain language in all
proposed and final rules published after January 1, 2000. The Board
invited comment on how to make the final rule easier to understand.\11\
No commenter indicated that the proposed rule should be revised to make
it easier to understand. In the preamble to the final rule the Board
indicated that it believes the final rule is written plainly and
clearly.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 69 FR 28856 (May 19, 2004).
\12\ 70 FR 11834 (March 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 225
Administrative Practice and Procedure, Banks, Banking, Federal
Reserve System, Holding companies, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Securities.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
12 CFR Chapter II
Authority and Issuance
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System amends part 225 of chapter II of title 12 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 225--BANK HOLDING COMPANIES AND CHANGE IN BANK CONTROL
(REGULATION Y)
0
1. The authority citation for part 225 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(13), 1818, 1828(o), 1831i, 1831p-1,
1843(c)(8), 1844(b), 1972(1), 3106, 3108, 3310, 3331-3351, 3907, and
3909; 15 U.S.C. 6801 and 6805.
Appendix A to Part 225 [Amended]
0
2. In Appendix A to part 225, paragraphs II.A.1.b.ii. and II.A.2.d.iv.
are amended by removing ``2009'' and adding ``2011'' in its place
wherever it appears.
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, March 16, 2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-6096 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-02-P