Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 11109-11111 [E9-5581]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 49 / Monday, March 16, 2009 / Notices similarly revised to include the current credit exposure arising from credit derivative contracts that represent (a) purchased protection that is defined as a covered position under the market risk capital guidelines and (b) purchased protection that is not a covered position under the market risk capital guidelines and is not recognized as a guarantee for risk-based capital purposes. The Federal Reserve also proposed to add new Memorandum items 3.a and 3.b to Schedule HC–R to collect the present value of unpaid premiums on sold credit protection that is defined as a covered position under the market risk capital guidelines. Consistent with the information currently reported in Memorandum item 2.g, the Federal Reserve proposed to collect this present value information with a breakdown between investment grade and subinvestment grade for the rating of the underlying reference asset and with the same three remaining maturity breakouts. No comments were received on any of the proposed reporting revisions pertaining to credit derivatives described above, except for a comment from a bankers’ organization on the proposal to collect data on Schedule HC–R relating to the present value of unpaid premiums on sold credit protection that is defined as a covered position under the market risk capital guidelines. Accordingly, the Federal Reserve will implement all of the proposed credit derivative reporting changes—other than the proposed new Schedule HC–R data items for present value data—as of June 30, 2009, as proposed. With respect to the present value data, the bankers’ organization requested clarification of the impact of this proposed reporting requirement on a banking institution’s risk-based capital calculations. The Federal Reserve is continuing to consider this comment and the proposed collection of present value data for certain credit derivatives. Therefore, the Federal Reserve will not add Memorandum items 3.a and 3.b to Schedule HC–R to collect this present value information effective June 30, 2009, as proposed. Once deliberations on the comment and the proposed present value data items have been concluded, conclusions will be published in a separate Federal Register notice. If Memorandum items 3.a and 3.b are subsequently added to Schedule HC–R, this new reporting requirement would take effect no earlier than December 31, 2009. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:38 Mar 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 11, 2009. Jennifer J. Johnson, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. E9–5584 Filed 3–13–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6210–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection project: ‘‘Improving Patient Flow and Reducing Emergency Department Crowding.’’ In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ invites the public to comment on this proposed information collection. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register on January 15th, 2009 and allowed 60 days for public comment. One comment was received. The purpose of this notice is to allow an additional 30 days for public comment. DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by April 15, 2009. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ’s OMB Desk Officer by fax at (202) 395–6974 (attention: AHRQ’s desk officer) or by email at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ’s desk officer). Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by e-mail at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed Project ‘‘Improving Patient Flow and Reducing Emergency Department Crowding’’ AHRQ proposes to study implementation of strategies from the Urgent Matters (UM) Toolkit for improving patient flow in emergency PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 11109 departments (ED). UM, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) funded initiative, began as a collaborative of 10 urban, safety net hospitals that experimented with a variety of strategies (now included in the ‘‘UM Toolkit’’) designed to relieve ED crowding. The first phase of this initiative demonstrated that reductions in ED crowding were achievable without investment of significant financial resources. However, implementation of these strategies has not been widespread, and questions remain about how readily the strategies could be implemented in a more diverse group of hospitals, and the associated costs and outcomes of implementation. This study is funded by a grant from RWJF to AHRQ. Six diverse hospitals have been selected for this study of the implementation of strategies from the UM Toolkit for improving ED patient flow. This study poses a common outcome goal across all six sites of improving patient flow and reducing ED crowding, but requires each hospital to select strategies that fit its own needs and context. This approach rests on innovation research showing that organizational innovations are more successful when they are aligned with features of the adopting hospital. Participating hospitals will select strategies from the UM Toolkit that they believe will work best to address the particular problems they face. The six hospitals have agreed to participate in a collaborative run by the UM National Program Office (NPO) over the course of this study to facilitate the sharing of data and experiences while the project is underway. This study will document the experiences of a diverse set of hospital EDs as they identify and implement ED patient flow improvement strategies. The six case study hospitals were selected to reflect diversity of size, ownership, teaching status, safety net status, and types of challenges with ED crowding. Research methods will include observational site visits, in-person and telephone interviews, and the analysis of cost data. AHRQ’s contractor for this study, Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET), will perform analysis of secondary data on ED performance measures; this secondary data will be provided to HRET by the Urgent Matters NPO. These qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to: • Study the processes through which hospitals decide upon and adopt patient flow improvement strategies; E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 11110 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 49 / Monday, March 16, 2009 / Notices • Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation and maintenance of these strategies; • Document changes in patient flow, patient satisfaction, and staff satisfaction associated with the implementation of strategies and processes; • Generate estimates of the costs of adopting the strategies; • Identify issues associated with the reporting of ED performance measures; and, • Develop lessons for hospitals considering the adoption of patient flow improvement strategies. The study will not be used to answer questions about causality or degrees of effectiveness (e.g., to what degree did a given intervention cause an improvement in patient flow?). Rather, the study seeks to enhance understanding of factors affecting decision-making and adoption processes that facilitate or hinder implementation. Insights and lessons learned about organizational, technical and resource challenges arising from these improvement activities may be of interest or benefit to others seeking to identify and adopt strategies to address similar problems in their EDs. This study is being conducted pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory authority to conduct and support research on health care and on systems for the delivery of such care, including activities with respect to: The quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and value of health care services; quality measurement and improvement; and health care costs, productivity, organization, and market forces. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1), (2), and (6). Method of Collection AHRQ seeks approval for the following data collection activities: In-person interviews will be conducted within two months of the implementation with up to 12 individuals at each of the 6 sites during two-day site visits to each of the hospitals. Telephone interviews will be conducted approximately 6 months after implementation with 12 individuals from each of the six hospitals (most or all of whom will be the same individuals interviewed in person). Estimated Annual Respondent Burden Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the hospitals’ time to participate in this study. In-person interviews will be conducted within two months of implementation with 12 administrative and clinical personnel from each of the six participating hospitals and will require about one hour. Telephone interviews will be conducted approximately six months thereafter with 12 individuals (administrative and clinical) from each hospital and will take about 45 minutes. The total estimated burden for participation in this study is 126 hours. EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Number of responses per hospital Number of hospitals Data collection Hours per response Total burden hours In-person interviews ......................................................................................... Telephone interviews ....................................................................................... 6 6 12 12 1.0 45/60 72 54 Total .......................................................................................................... 12 na na 126 Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden for the respondents’ time to provide the requested data. The total cost burden is approximately $4,419. EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN Total burden hours Data collection Average hourly wage rate * Total cost burden In-person interviews ..................................................................................................................... Telephone interviews ................................................................................................................... 72 54 $35.07 $35.07 $2,525 1,894 Total ...................................................................................................................................... 126 na 4,419 * For the interviews, the hourly rate of $35.07 is an average of the admini strative personnel hourly wage of $14.53, the physician rate of $62.52, and the registered nurse rate of $28.15. National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States 2005, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal Government Exhibit 3 shows the total and annualized cost to the government for this eighteen-month study. EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED COST Cost component Total cost Project Development ............................................................................................................................................... Data Collection Activities ......................................................................................................................................... VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:38 Mar 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1 52,446 90,298 Annualized cost 34,964 60,199 11111 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 49 / Monday, March 16, 2009 / Notices EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED COST—Continued Cost component Total cost Annualized cost Data Processing and Analysis ................................................................................................................................. Publication of Results .............................................................................................................................................. Project Management ................................................................................................................................................ Overhead ................................................................................................................................................................. 70,569 41,420 68,908 76,320 47,046 27,613 45,939 50,880 Total .................................................................................................................................................................. $399,961 266,641 Request for Comments In accordance with the above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act legislation, comments on AHRQ’s information collection are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ’s health care research and health care information dissemination functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the Agency’s subsequent request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record. Dated: March 9, 2009. Carolyn M. Clancy, Director. [FR Doc. E9–5581 Filed 3–13–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–90–M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Meeting of the National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and Quality AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). ACTION: Notice of public meeting. SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, this notice announces a meeting of the National VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:38 Mar 13, 2009 Jkt 217001 Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and Quality. DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, April 3, 2009, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Eisenberg Conference Center, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Queenan, Coordinator of the Advisory Council, at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850, (301) 427–1330. For press-related information, please contact Karen Migdail at (301) 427–1855. If sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodation for a disability is needed, please contact Mr. Donald L. Inniss, Director, Office of Equal Employment Opportunity Program, Program Support Center, on (301) 443–1144, no later than March 27, 2009. The agenda, roster, and minutes are available from Ms. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850. Ms. Campbell’s phone number is (301) 427–1554. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Purpose The National Advisory Council for Healthcare Research and Quality was established in accordance with Section 921 (now Section 931) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 299c. In accordance with its statutory mandate, the Council is to advise the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and the Director, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), on matters related to actions of AHRQ to enhance the quality, improve the outcomes, and reduce the costs of health care services; improve access to such services through scientific research; and promote improvements in clinical practice and in the organization, financing, and delivery of health care services. The Council is composed of members of the public, appointed by the PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Secretary, and Federal ex-officio members. II. Agenda On Friday, April 3, the Council meeting will convene at 9 a.m., with the call to order by the Council Chair and approval of previous Council minutes. The AHRQ director will present her update on current research, programs, and initiatives. The agenda will include a discussion of AHRQ budget for FY09, the comparative effectiveness program, and the AHRQ activities under American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The final agenda will be available on the AHRQ Web site at https:// www.ahrg.gov no later than March 30, 2009. Dated: March 9, 2009. Carolyn M. Clancy, Alternate Certifying Officer Director. [FR Doc. E9–5580 Filed 3–13–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–90–M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Subcommittee on Procedures Reviews, Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (ABRWH), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), CDC announces the following meeting for the aforementioned subcommittee: Time and Date: 10 a.m.–5 p.m., March 24, 2009. Place: Cincinnati Airport Marriott, 2395 Progress Drive, Hebron, Kentucky 41018. Telephone (859) 334–4611, Fax (859) 334– 4619. Status: Open to the public, but without a public oral comment period. To access by conference call dial the following information 1 (866) 659–0537, Participant Pass Code 9933701. Background: The Advisory Board was established under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM 16MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 49 (Monday, March 16, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11109-11111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5581]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for 
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection 
project: ``Improving Patient Flow and Reducing Emergency Department 
Crowding.'' In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ invites the public to comment on this 
proposed information collection.
    This proposed information collection was previously published in 
the Federal Register on January 15th, 2009 and allowed 60 days for 
public comment. One comment was received. The purpose of this notice is 
to allow an additional 30 days for public comment.

DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by April 15, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: AHRQ's OMB Desk 
Officer by fax at (202) 395-6974 (attention: AHRQ's desk officer) or by 
e-mail at OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov (attention: AHRQ's desk 
officer).
    Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection 
instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be 
obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports 
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by e-mail at 
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Proposed Project

    ``Improving Patient Flow and Reducing Emergency Department 
Crowding'' AHRQ proposes to study implementation of strategies from the 
Urgent Matters (UM) Toolkit for improving patient flow in emergency 
departments (ED). UM, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) funded 
initiative, began as a collaborative of 10 urban, safety net hospitals 
that experimented with a variety of strategies (now included in the 
``UM Toolkit'') designed to relieve ED crowding. The first phase of 
this initiative demonstrated that reductions in ED crowding were 
achievable without investment of significant financial resources. 
However, implementation of these strategies has not been widespread, 
and questions remain about how readily the strategies could be 
implemented in a more diverse group of hospitals, and the associated 
costs and outcomes of implementation. This study is funded by a grant 
from RWJF to AHRQ.
    Six diverse hospitals have been selected for this study of the 
implementation of strategies from the UM Toolkit for improving ED 
patient flow. This study poses a common outcome goal across all six 
sites of improving patient flow and reducing ED crowding, but requires 
each hospital to select strategies that fit its own needs and context. 
This approach rests on innovation research showing that organizational 
innovations are more successful when they are aligned with features of 
the adopting hospital. Participating hospitals will select strategies 
from the UM Toolkit that they believe will work best to address the 
particular problems they face. The six hospitals have agreed to 
participate in a collaborative run by the UM National Program Office 
(NPO) over the course of this study to facilitate the sharing of data 
and experiences while the project is underway.
    This study will document the experiences of a diverse set of 
hospital EDs as they identify and implement ED patient flow improvement 
strategies. The six case study hospitals were selected to reflect 
diversity of size, ownership, teaching status, safety net status, and 
types of challenges with ED crowding.
    Research methods will include observational site visits, in-person 
and telephone interviews, and the analysis of cost data. AHRQ's 
contractor for this study, Health Research & Educational Trust (HRET), 
will perform analysis of secondary data on ED performance measures; 
this secondary data will be provided to HRET by the Urgent Matters NPO. 
These qualitative and quantitative methods will be used to:
     Study the processes through which hospitals decide upon 
and adopt patient flow improvement strategies;

[[Page 11110]]

     Identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation 
and maintenance of these strategies;
     Document changes in patient flow, patient satisfaction, 
and staff satisfaction associated with the implementation of strategies 
and processes;
     Generate estimates of the costs of adopting the 
strategies;
     Identify issues associated with the reporting of ED 
performance measures; and,
     Develop lessons for hospitals considering the adoption of 
patient flow improvement strategies.
    The study will not be used to answer questions about causality or 
degrees of effectiveness (e.g., to what degree did a given intervention 
cause an improvement in patient flow?). Rather, the study seeks to 
enhance understanding of factors affecting decision-making and adoption 
processes that facilitate or hinder implementation. Insights and 
lessons learned about organizational, technical and resource challenges 
arising from these improvement activities may be of interest or benefit 
to others seeking to identify and adopt strategies to address similar 
problems in their EDs.
    This study is being conducted pursuant to AHRQ's statutory 
authority to conduct and support research on health care and on systems 
for the delivery of such care, including activities with respect to: 
The quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and value of 
health care services; quality measurement and improvement; and health 
care costs, productivity, organization, and market forces. 42 U.S.C. 
299a(a)(1), (2), and (6).

Method of Collection

    AHRQ seeks approval for the following data collection activities:
    In-person interviews will be conducted within two months of the 
implementation with up to 12 individuals at each of the 6 sites during 
two-day site visits to each of the hospitals.
    Telephone interviews will be conducted approximately 6 months after 
implementation with 12 individuals from each of the six hospitals (most 
or all of whom will be the same individuals interviewed in person).

Estimated Annual Respondent Burden

    Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the 
hospitals' time to participate in this study. In-person interviews will 
be conducted within two months of implementation with 12 administrative 
and clinical personnel from each of the six participating hospitals and 
will require about one hour. Telephone interviews will be conducted 
approximately six months thereafter with 12 individuals (administrative 
and clinical) from each hospital and will take about 45 minutes. The 
total estimated burden for participation in this study is 126 hours.

                                  Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
                 Data collection                     Number of     responses per     Hours per     Total burden
                                                     hospitals       hospital        response          hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In-person interviews............................               6              12             1.0              72
Telephone interviews............................               6              12           45/60              54
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................              12              na              na             126
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden for the 
respondents' time to provide the requested data. The total cost burden 
is approximately $4,419.

                                   Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Total burden   Average hourly    Total cost
                         Data collection                               hours        wage rate *       burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In-person interviews............................................              72          $35.07          $2,525
Telephone interviews............................................              54          $35.07           1,894
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................             126              na           4,419
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* For the interviews, the hourly rate of $35.07 is an average of the admini strative personnel hourly wage of
  $14.53, the physician rate of $62.52, and the registered nurse rate of $28.15. National Compensation Survey:
  Occupational Wages in the United States 2005, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal Government

    Exhibit 3 shows the total and annualized cost to the government for 
this eighteen-month study.

                        Exhibit 3--Estimated Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Annualized
             Cost component                 Total cost         cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Development.....................          52,446          34,964
Data Collection Activities..............          90,298          60,199

[[Page 11111]]

 
Data Processing and Analysis............          70,569          47,046
Publication of Results..................          41,420          27,613
Project Management......................          68,908          45,939
Overhead................................          76,320          50,880
                                         -------------------------------
    Total...............................        $399,961         266,641
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Request for Comments

    In accordance with the above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act 
legislation, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested 
with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
AHRQ's health care research and health care information dissemination 
functions, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours 
and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information upon the respondents, including the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the 
proposed information collection.
    All comments will become a matter of public record.

    Dated: March 9, 2009.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-5581 Filed 3-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.