Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products, 10830-10836 [E9-5459]
Download as PDF
10830
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
distribution is to be truncated so that
the deep percolation rates vary between
10 and 100 mm/year (0.39 and 3.9 in./
year).
(3) DOE must assess the effects of
general corrosion on engineered
barriers. DOE may use a constant
representative corrosion rate throughout
the period of geologic stability or a
distribution of corrosion rates correlated
to other repository parameters.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day
of March 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–5448 Filed 3–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 436
RIN 1904–AB68
Federal Procurement of Energy
Efficient Products
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) today publishes a final
rule to promote Federal procurement of
energy-efficient products. The final rule
establishes guidelines for Federal
agencies regarding the implementation
of amendments to the National Energy
Conservation Policy Act (NECPA) that
require Federal agencies to procure
ENERGY STAR qualified and Federal
Energy Management Program (FEMP)
designated products in procurements
involving energy consuming products
and systems. Today’s final rule includes
changes in response to comments
received on the notice of proposed
rulemaking published June 19, 2007.
Most notably, today’s final rule does not
establish a reporting requirement, as
initially proposed, for federal agencies
under procurement requirement of
NECPA.
DATES: This rule is effective April 13,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical issues contact Mr. Cyrus
Nasseri, U.S. Department of Energy,
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Federal Energy
Management Program, EE–2L, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121, (202) 586–
9138, e-mail: cyrus.nasseri@ee.doe.gov.
For legal issues contact Mr. Chris
Calamita, U.S. Department of Energy,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
Office of the General Counsel, Forrestal
Building, GC–72, 1000 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585,
(202) 586–9507, e-mail:
Christopher.Calamita@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction and Background
A. The Energy Policy Act of 2005
B. ENERGY STAR Qualified and FEMP
Designated Products
C. Proposed Rule
D. Draft Guidance
II. Discussion of Comments and the Final
Rule
A. Definition of ‘‘Covered Product’’
B. Reporting Agency Exceptions to the
Procurement Requirement
C. Compliance With Section 553
D. Definition of Criteria for ENERGY STAR
Qualification or FEMP Designation
E. Supply Source for Excepted
Procurement
III. DOE Guidance
A. Procurements
B. Procurement Planning
C. Exceptions
IV. Regulatory Review
A. National Environmental Policy Act
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
F. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
G. Executive Order 12866
H. Executive Order 12988
I. Executive Order 13132
J. Executive Order 13211
V. Congressional Notification
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Introduction and Background
A. The Energy Policy Act of 2005
The Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPACT 2005) (Pub. L. 109–58; August
8, 2005), amended Part 3 of title V of
NECPA (42 U.S.C. 8251–8259) by
adding section 553. Section 553 of
NECPA requires each Federal agency to
procure ENERGY STAR qualified or
FEMP designated products, unless the
head of the agency determines in
writing that a statutory exception
applies. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)) Section
553 of NECPA was further amended by
section 525 of the Energy Independence
and Security Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 140–
110; December 19, 2007) to clarify that
the procurement requirement applies to
the procurement of a product in a
category covered by the Energy Star
program or the FEMP program for
designated products. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(1)) Further, each Federal
agency is required to incorporate into
the specifications of all procurements
involving energy consuming products
and systems, and into the factors for
evaluation of offers received for such
procurements, criteria for energy
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
efficiency that are consistent with the
criteria used for rating ENERGY STAR
qualified products and for rating FEMP
designated products. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(3))
Section 553 also requires that all
inventories or listings of products
operated and maintained by the General
Services Administration (GSA) and the
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) clearly
identify and prominently display
ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products in any listing or
inventory of products, and it requires
GSA and DLA to supply only ENERGY
STAR qualified and FEMP designated
products in all covered product
categories, except in cases in which the
head of the agency ordering a product
specifies in writing that an exception
applies. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(c))
Section 553 of NECPA contains two
exceptions to the requirement to
procure only ENERGY STAR qualified
and FEMP designated products, and it
excludes a specific category of energy
consuming products from coverage.
A procurement may be excepted if the
head of an agency finds in writing that
either: (1) An ENERGY STAR qualified
product or FEMP designated product is
not cost-effective over the life of the
product taking energy cost savings into
account; or (2) no ENERGY STAR
qualified product or FEMP designated
product is reasonably available that
meets the functional requirements of the
agency. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)) In
addition, section 553 excludes from the
definition of products subject to these
requirements any energy consuming
product or system designed or procured
for combat or combat-related missions.
(42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5))
The subsection entitled
‘‘REGULATIONS,’’ section 553(f) of
NECPA, directs the Secretary of Energy
to issue guidelines to carry out the
statute. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(f)) NECPA
section 553 imposes procurement
requirements on agencies and additional
requirements on GSA and DLA. DOE
does not need to issue regulations to
implement those statutory requirements.
Moreover, DOE does not have the
authority to change by regulation the
statutory procurement requirements that
are applicable to agencies or the
additional requirements that govern
GSA and DLA.
Consistent with the direction
provided in section 553(f), today’s final
rule amends 10 CFR part 436, Federal
Energy Management and Planning
Programs, to establish guidelines for
Federal agencies on compliance with
section 553.
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
B. ENERGY STAR Qualified and FEMP
Designated Products
In 1992, the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
introduced ENERGY STAR as a
voluntary labeling program designed to
identify and promote energy efficient
products, in part, to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions.
In response to Executive Order 12902,
‘‘Energy Efficiency and Water
Conservation at Federal Facilities,’’ (59
FR 11463; March 8, 1994) twenty-two
federal agencies signed an agreement in
1994 to shift their purchasing of energyusing products to the best 25% of
models on the market. Products that
were labeled with the ENERGY STAR
logo met this requirement. The
Department of Energy’s Federal Energy
Management Program (FEMP) provided
additional guidance to Federal agencies
to identify efficient products not
covered by the ENERGY STAR program,
i.e., FEMP designated products.
In 1999, the partnership between EPA
and DOE was furthered by Executive
Order 13123, ‘‘Greening the Government
Through Efficient Energy Management,’’
which directed EPA and DOE to
expedite the process of designating
products as ENERGY STAR qualified
and to merge their efficiency rating
procedures. 64 FR 30851; June 8, 1999.
Executive Order 13123 was replaced
with Executive Order 13423,
‘‘Strengthening Federal Environmental,
Energy, and Transportation
Management,’’ which requires, among
other things, that in acquisitions of
goods and services Federal agencies use
sustainable environmental practices,
including acquisition of bio-based,
environmentally preferable, energyefficient, water-efficient, and recycledcontent products. 72 FR 3919; January
26, 2007.
In EPACT 2005, Congress established
statutory parameters for the ENERGY
STAR program. (42 U.S.C. 6294a) The
statute prescribes the program duties of
the Administrator of EPA and the
Secretary of Energy; requires the
solicitation of public comment before an
ENERGY STAR product category,
specification or criterion is established
or revised; and establishes a lead time
before a new or significant revision of a
product category, specification, or
criterion may become effective.
EPACT 2005 also reaffirmed the
authority of the Federal Energy
Management Program to identify a
product as being ‘‘among the highest 25
percent of equivalent products for
energy efficiency.’’ (42 U.S.C.
8259b(a)(4))
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
Currently, ENERGY STAR qualified
and FEMP designated products cover 62
types of products in the following
categories: (1) Lighting; (2) commercial
and industrial equipment; (3) food
service equipment; (4) office equipment;
(5) home electronics; (6) appliances; (7)
residential equipment; (8) plumbing;
and (9) construction products. ENERGY
STAR qualified and FEMP designated
products have been determined to be
life-cycle cost-effective in normal usage.
However, purchasers are encouraged to
evaluate products according to their
specific applications and circumstances.
Life-cycle cost calculators for many of
the ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products can be accessed
at:https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/
procurement/eep_eccalculators.html.
C. Proposed Rule
As discussed above, NECPA section
553(f), entitled ‘‘REGULATIONS,’’
directs DOE to issue guidelines to carry
out the section. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(e)) On
June 19, 2007, DOE published a notice
of proposed rulemaking that proposed a
reporting requirement to track agency
compliance with the procurement
requirements established in section 553
of NECPA. 72 FR 33696; June 19, 2007.
DOE also published draft guidance to
assist Federal agencies in complying
with the procurement requirements
established in section 553.
NECPA section 553 applies to the
procurement of energy consuming
products. Section 553 defines ‘‘product’’
as excluding energy consuming
products or systems designed or
procured for combat or combat-related
missions. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5)) For the
purpose of the reporting requirement,
the proposed rule relied on the term
‘‘covered product,’’ i.e., a product or
system that is in a category covered by
the ENERGY STAR or FEMP program.
Covered products are those energy
consuming products that the ENERGY
STAR or FEMP programs determined to
hold the greatest promise for energy
savings. Within these product
categories, there is typically a broad
range of life-cycle costs associated with
the products. ENERGY STAR and FEMP
identify those products with lower lifecycle costs for federal buyers. Both
programs will continue to review
market trends and product availability,
and may determine that additional
products should be added to the list of
covered products.
Section 553(a)(1) specifies a definition
of agency that includes an agency under
any branch of the Government
(including a congressional agency). (42
U.S.C. 8259b(a)(1)) The proposed rule
defined ‘‘agency’’ consistent with the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10831
definition contained in Title 5 of the
United States Code, which essentially
limits the term ‘‘agency’’ to those under
the Executive Branch. (5 U.S.C. 551(1))
DOE initially determined that the
inclusion of non-Executive Branch
agencies under the definition in section
553(a)(1) of NECPA was inappropriate
for a regulation promulgated by DOE
given DOE’s authority. 72 FR 33697.
Moreover, the definition of ‘‘agency’’ in
5 U.S.C. 551(1) is incorporated by
reference into subchapter III, Federal
Energy Initiative, of Chapter 91 of Title
42 of the United States Code, which
includes section 553. DOE noted that
the other branches of the Government
may, at their discretion, rely on DOE’s
regulation and guidance in
implementing section 553.
As stated above, section 553 of
NECPA contains two exceptions to the
requirement to procure only ENERGY
STAR qualified and FEMP designated
products. In order to track exceptions,
DOE proposed reporting requirements to
track the exception findings made by
agency heads. DOE initially determined
that information regarding the
procurement of products for which an
exception was necessary would help
DOE and EPA determine if there is a
need for revisions to ENERGY STAR
qualified or FEMP designated products.
DOE has determined that existing
reporting and tracking mechanisms
provide an adequate means to collect
and analyze information regarding
agency procurement of these products.
D. Draft Guidance
In the preamble to the proposed rule,
DOE provided draft guidance on
compliance with the procurement
requirements set forth in section 553 of
NECPA. As discussed previously in this
document, section 553(b) requires that
when agencies procure energy
consuming products, either directly or
through part of a larger contract (e.g.,
construction, renovation, and service or
maintenance contracts) that they
procure either an ENERGY STAR
qualified product or a FEMP designated
product. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(1)) Section
553(c) requires GSA and DLA to clearly
identify and prominently display
ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products in any inventory or
listing of products by these agencies and
that they supply only ENERGY STAR
qualified and FEMP designated
products when appropriate. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(c))
DOE encourages agencies other than
GSA and DLA that operate procurement
ordering systems to achieve the goals of
section 553.
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
10832
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Comments were received on the draft
guidance provided in the notice of
proposed rulemaking. The discussion
below responds to those comments and
provides guidance for Federal agencies
in complying with section 553.
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
II. Discussion of Comments and the
Final Rule
Today’s final rule contains a number
of changes from the proposed rule. Most
significantly, the final rule does not
include a reporting requirement. The
changes are discussed below.
DOE received thirteen comments in
response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking. The comments covered the
following topics: Definition of products
covered under the rule—specifically,
whether a product must itself be
‘‘energy consuming’’ to be considered a
‘‘covered product’’; reporting of
exceptions granted by each agency;
responsibilities of agencies to define
procedures to comply with NECPA
section 553 requirements; and criteria
determining whether a product meets
the requirement of ‘‘Energy Starqualified or FEMP-designated.’’ DOE
received several comments in support of
the proposed rule.
A. Definition of ‘‘Covered Product’’
Several commenters raised issues
concerning the definition of covered
product. (See comments from Single Ply
Roofing Industry, Duro-Last Roofing,
Information Technology Industry
Council, Chemical Fabrics & Film
Association, Inc., Sika Sarnafil, Inc.)
Commenters suggested that the
definition of ‘‘covered product’’ be
expanded to include all products for
which an ENERGY STAR qualification
or a FEMP designation is established.
Discussion of the term ‘‘product’’ in
the preamble of the notice of proposed
rulemaking was in the context of
‘‘energy consuming’’ products. 72 FR
33697; June 19, 2007. However, in the
proposed regulatory text, ‘‘covered
product’’ was defined more broadly as
‘‘a product that is of a category for
which an ENERGY STAR qualification
or FEMP designation is established.’’
The ENERGY STAR categories cover
products that do not consume energy,
such as windows and roofing materials.
DOE is maintaining the definition of
‘‘covered product’’ as in the proposed
regulatory text. The definition of
‘‘covered product’’ for the purpose of
the regulation includes any product that
is of a category for which an ENERGY
STAR qualification or FEMP
designation is established. However, the
statutory procurement requirements
apply only to the procurement of
products as set forth in section 553 of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
NECPA. (42 U.S.C. 8259b) As noted
above, section 553 of NECPA, as
recently amended, specifies that the
requirement applies to the procurement
of an energy consuming product in a
product category covered by the Energy
Star Program or the FEMP program for
designating products. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(1)) The definition of ‘‘covered
product’’ established in today’s final
rule clarifies that the requirements
under section 553 of NECPA apply only
with regard to energy consuming
products that are of a product category
covered by the Energy Star Program or
the FEMP program for designating
products.
The Information Technology Industry
Council stated that it was unclear what
the term ‘‘category’’ meant in the
definition of covered product. The
ENERGY STAR and FEMP programs
apply to specified types of products, i.e.,
categories. A listing of the product
categories covered by the ENERGY
STAR program can be found at https://
www.energystar.gov/
index.cfm?fuseaction=find_a_product.
Currently, there is no companion list
of FEMP designated products, but the
FEMP specifications for energy
efficiency products are located at
https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/
procurement/eep_requirements.html.
B. Reporting Agency Exceptions to the
Procurement Requirement
Several comments were received
regarding the perceived burdens of
requiring agencies to report information
regarding the finding of an exception
under section 553(b)(2) of NECPA. (See
comments from Office of Federal
Environmental Executive; Department
of Justice; Department of Commerce).
These commenters indicated that the
reporting requirement included in the
notice of proposed rulemaking would be
unduly burdensome on agencies.
DOE recognizes that there are several
existing reporting requirements through
which DOE can obtain information on
exceptions found under section 533 of
NECPA, without the need to establish a
separate reporting requirement through
regulation. Specifically, Federal
agencies are currently required to
provide information for DOE’s annual
report on energy use and the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy’s annual
report on green purchasing
requirements. DOE will coordinate with
the Office of Management and Budget to
incorporate information regarding the
finding of exemptions under section 533
of NECPA as part of the data collected
for the these annual reports. By relying
on existing reporting schemes, DOE
avoids any potential redundancy in
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reporting requirements for Federal
agencies. Therefore, DOE is not
establishing a reporting requirement in
today’s final rule.
C. Compliance With Section 553
Several comments were received
regarding agency compliance with the
procurement requirements in section
553 of NECPA. Specifically, some of
these comments requested that DOE
establish regulations:
—Establishing requirements for GSA
and DLA to identify energy-efficient
products (comment from Alliance to
Save Energy);
—Specifying how agencies are to
determine the cost-effectiveness of
products for the purpose of an
exception finding (comments from
Office of Federal Environmental
Executive; Information Technologies
Industry Council; and Department of
Veterans Affairs); and
—Providing additional exceptions that
may be available to Federal agencies
(comments from Office of Federal
Environmental Executive and
Department of Veterans Affairs).
As stated above, DOE has determined
that the procurement requirements and
the product listing requirements of
section 553 of NECPA are selfexecuting. However, today’s final rule
codifies the guidance provided in the
preamble of the notice of proposed
rulemaking and this document. Placing
the guidance in the Code of Federal
Regulations, agencies should be able to
more readily access the guidance.
With regard to a finding under the
exception provision in section 553(b)(2),
each agency should develop a process
for evaluating its individual product
needs. In the guidance section below,
DOE does provide guidance on how an
agency may evaluate the costeffectiveness of a product.
The exception provision in section
553 provides specific criteria for
determining when such an exception
finding can be made. Section 553 does
not include provisions granting
exceptions beyond those enumerated in
that section. While section 553 specifies
that a finding of an exception is to be
made by the head of an agency, agencies
may consider, as appropriate, the
delegation of the exception authority to
other officials within the agency.
D. Definition of Criteria for ENERGY
STAR Qualification or FEMP
Designation
One comment (comment from
Arkansas Lamp Manufacturing) dealt
with the mechanism by which the
ENERGY STAR program determines the
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
criteria by which ENERGY STAR
qualified products are identified. This
process is beyond the scope of this
regulation. Moreover, as noted above,
EPACT 2005 established statutory
parameters for the ENERGY STAR
program. (42 U.S.C. 6294a)
Another comment (comment from
Information Technology Industry
Council) dealt with the distinction
between a product meeting the
functional requirements contained in
the technical specifications for ENERGY
STAR products and a product that is
ENERGY STAR qualified. The language
of section 553 of NECPA requires
federal agencies to procure an ENERGY
STAR qualified product; i.e., a product
manufactured by a full participant in
the ENERGY STAR program. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(1)(A)) A product must be
ENERGY STAR qualified to meet the
procurement requirements; functional
performance alone is not sufficient.
E. Supply Source for Excepted
Procurement
One comment (comment from
Alliance to Save Energy) requested that
DOE require the federal supply sources
(GSA and DLA) to verify that customers
had prepared a written exception before
supplying a covered product that is not
ENERGY STAR qualified or FEMP
designated. As discussed above, DOE
does not have the authority to change by
regulation the statutory requirements
that govern GSA and DLA.
III. DOE Guidance
Section 533(e) of NECPA, titled
‘‘Regulations’’, directs DOE to issue
guidelines to carry out the procurement
requirements of that section. As
indicated previously in this document,
DOE is codifying, to the extent practical,
the guidance provided in the preamble
of the notice of proposed rulemaking
and this document. As noted, the
guidance provided in the Code of
Federal Regulations, should be more
readily accessible to agencies, as
opposed to guidance provided only in
the Federal Register.
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
A. Procurements
Requirements for Federal
procurement are governed, in part, by
the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR). (48 CFR part 1 et seq.). On
November 23, 2007, the FAR
requirements were revised to reflect the
requirements in section 553 of NECPA.
72 FR 65868; Nov. 23, 2007. DOE has
worked closely with members of the
FAR Council to ensure a consistency
between today’s final rule and the
recent FAR revision.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
Federal agencies are generally
required to procure an ENERGY STAR
qualified or FEMP designated product
whenever procuring a covered product.
Additionally, products furnished by
contractors while performing at a
federally controlled facility should be
qualified products regardless of whether
the government receives title at the end
of contract performance.
A list of product categories, which
contain ENERGY STAR qualified and
FEMP designed products, is located at
https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/
eep_productfactsheet.pdf.
To identify actual products that are
ENERGY STAR rated, potential
purchasers can go to https://
www.energystar.gov/products.
Currently, there is no companion list
of FEMP designated products, but the
FEMP specifications for energy
efficiency products are located at
https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/
procurement/eep_requirements.html.
B. Procurement Planning
In addition to establishing
requirements for the actual procurement
of certain products, section 553(b)(3)
directs heads of agencies to incorporate
into the specifications for all
procurements involving covered
products criteria for energy efficiency
that are consistent with the criteria used
to rate ENERGY STAR products and
FEMP designated products. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(3)) This requirement applies to
general specifications, project
specifications, and construction,
renovation and service contracts that
involve the procurement of covered
products. Agencies should consider this
requirement to apply to:
• Design, design/build, renovation,
retrofit and services contracts; facility
maintenance and operations contracts;
as well as energy savings performance
contracts and utility energy service
contracts.
• If applicable, lease agreements for
buildings or equipment, including
build-to-lease contracts, such as those
used to implement the Military Housing
Privatization Initiative.
Further, agencies should require the
procurement of ENERGY STAR and
FEMP designated products in new
service contracts and other existing
service contracts as they are recompeted
and should, to the extent possible,
incorporate such requirements and
preferences into existing contracts as
they are modified or extended through
options.
As directed by section 553(b)(3),
Federal agencies should include criteria
for energy efficiency that are consistent
with the criteria used for rating
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10833
qualified products in the factors for the
evaluation of:
• Offers received for procurements
involving covered products, and
• Offers received for construction,
renovation, and services contracts that
include provisions for covered products.
Agencies should notify their vendors
of the Federal requirements for energy
efficient purchasing.
Guidance is available for developing
model contract language for contracts
which involve covered products. Model
contract language for all ENERGY STAR
qualified and FEMP designated
products can be found at https://
www.eere.energy.gov/femp/
procurement/eep_modellang.html.
Moreover, there are guide specification
requirements which have already been
incorporated in existing specifications
such as the Unified Facilities Guide
Specifications, which are available at
https://www.wbdg.org/ccb/
browse_org.php?o=70, and EPA’s
Federal Guide for Green Construction
Specifications, which is available at
https://www.wbdg.org/design/
greenspec.php.
Further, FEMP offers a series of
training opportunities for procurement
staff that are listed at https://
www.eere.energy.gov/femp/services/
training_catalog.html. New classes are
periodically added to the Web site.
Procurement officials are encouraged to
take advantage of these training
opportunities, which can provide a
useful context to understand the
benefits of energy efficient technologies
and the innovative financing strategies
available to fund them.
Although energy consuming products
or systems that are designed or procured
for combat or combat-related missions
are not subject to the requirements of
this subpart (see § 436.40 of this
subpart), DOE encourages the
Department of Defense to incorporate
energy efficiency criteria into
procurements of combat-related
equipment, to the extent practicable.
C. Exceptions
As stated above, section 553 provides
for exceptions to the procurement
requirements. Under the statute, an
agency may only procure an energy
consuming product that is not an
ENERGY STAR qualified or FEMP
designated product if the head of the
agency finds in writing that an
exception applies. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(2)) Under section 553(b)(2) a
written exception can only be made if
one of two criteria are met. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(2)) The first criterion requires
an agency head to find that a product is
not life-cycle cost-effective in the
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
10834
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
application for which it will be used.
(42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)(A)) Although
ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products are life-cycle costeffective under normal use conditions,
they may not be if used in a specialized
way or for very limited hours. When
making a determination that a product
is not life-cycle cost-effective, an agency
should rely on the life-cycle cost
analysis method in part 436, subpart A,
of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, or another method
determined by the agency to be
equivalent.
The second criterion requires an
agency head to find that there is no
ENERGY STAR qualified or FEMP
designated product reasonably available
that meets the functional requirements
of the agency. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)(B))
IV. Regulatory Review
A. Executive Order 12866
Today’s final rule has been
determined not to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f)(1)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review. (58 FR 51735;
October 4, 1993).
B. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this rule is
covered under the Categorical Exclusion
found in DOE’s National Environmental
Policy Act regulations at paragraph A.6
of Appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR
part 1021. That Categorical Exclusion
applies to rulemakings that are strictly
procedural, such as rulemaking
establishing a reporting requirement
applicable to contracting practices for
the purchase of goods and services. The
rule establishes guidance for Federal
agencies with regard to the requirements
of section 553 to procure energy
efficient products and develop
procurement practices which facilitate
the purchase of energy efficient
products.
The rule would not establish any
procurement requirements.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement.
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires the
preparation of an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis for any rule that by
law must be proposed for public
comment, unless the agency certifies
that the rule, if promulgated, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order
13272, ‘‘Proper Consideration of Small
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
Entities in Agency Rulemaking,’’ (67 FR
53461; August 16, 2002), DOE published
procedures and policies on February 19,
2003, to ensure that the potential
impacts of its rules on small entities are
properly considered during the
rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990; Feb.
19, 2003. The Department has made its
procedures and policies available on the
Office of General Counsel’s Web site:
https://www.gc.doe.gov.
DOE has reviewed today’s rule under
the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the procedures and
policies published on February 19,
2003. Today’s final rule applies only to
Federal agencies. Today’s final rule will
not impact small entities. In addition,
the final rule only facilitates Federal
agency compliance with a statutory
mandate to procure ENERGY STAR
qualified and FEMP designated
products. On the basis of the foregoing,
DOE certifies that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis for this
rulemaking. This certification and
supporting statement of factual basis
will be provided to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b).
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
No new record keeping requirements,
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act,
44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., are imposed by
this final rule.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine
closely the impacts of regulatory actions
on State, local, and tribal governments,
or the private sector. Subsection 101(5)
of title I of that law defines a Federal
intergovernmental mandate to include
any regulation that would impose upon
State, local, or tribal governments an
enforceable duty, except a condition of
Federal assistance or a duty arising from
participating in a voluntary Federal
program. Title II of that law requires
each Federal agency to assess the effects
of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or to the private sector, other
than to the extent such actions merely
incorporate requirements specifically
set forth in a statute. Section 202 of that
title requires a Federal agency to
perform a detailed assessment of the
anticipated costs and benefits of any
rule that includes a Federal mandate
which may result in costs to State, local,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or tribal governments, or to the private
sector, of $100 million or more.
Section 204 of that title requires each
agency that proposes a rule containing
a significant Federal intergovernmental
mandate to develop an effective process
for obtaining meaningful and timely
input from elected officers of State,
local, and tribal governments.
This rule does not impose a Federal
mandate on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector.
Accordingly, no assessment or analysis
is required under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
F. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105–277) requires
Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule
that may affect family well-being.
This final rule will not have any
impact on the autonomy or integrity of
the family as an institution.
Accordingly, DOE has concluded that it
is not necessary to prepare a Family
Policymaking Assessment.
G. Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 2001
(44 U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for
agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under
guidelines established by each agency
pursuant to general guidelines issued by
OMB. OMB’s guidelines were published
at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002).
DOE’s guidelines were published at 67
FR 62446 (October 7, 2002).
DOE has reviewed today’s final rule
under the OMB and DOE guidelines and
has concluded that it is consistent with
applicable policies in those guidelines.
H. Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing
regulations and the promulgation of
new regulations, section 3(a) of
Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice
Reform,’’ (61 FR 4729; February 7,
1996), imposes on Executive agencies
the general duty to adhere to the
following requirements: (1) Eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and
(3) provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct rather than a general
standard and promote simplification
and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of
Executive Order 12988 specifically
requires that Executive agencies make
every reasonable effort to ensure that the
regulation: (1) Clearly specifies the
preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
specifies any effect on existing Federal
law or regulation; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct
while promoting simplification and
burden reduction; (4) specifies the
retroactive effect, if any; (5) adequately
defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity
and general draftsmanship under any
guidelines issued by the Attorney
General. Section 3(c) of Executive Order
12988 requires Executive agencies to
review regulations in light of applicable
standards in section 3(a) and section
3(b) to determine whether they are met
or it is unreasonable to meet one or
more of them.
DOE has completed the required
review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this rule meets
the relevant standards of Executive
Order 12988.
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
(64 FR 43255; August 4, 1999), imposes
certain requirements on agencies
formulating and implementing policies
or regulations that preempt State law or
that have federalism implications. The
Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory
authority supporting any action that
would limit the policymaking discretion
of the States and to carefully assess the
necessity for such actions. The
Executive Order also requires agencies
to have an accountable process to
ensure meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications. On March
14, 2000, DOE published a statement of
policy describing the intergovernmental
consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR
13735; Mar. 14, 2000.
DOE has examined this rule and
determined that it does not preempt
State law and does not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of Government. No further action
is required by Executive Order 13132.
J. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use,’’ 66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to
prepare and submit to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA), Office of Management and
Budget, a Statement of Energy Effects for
any proposed significant energy action.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
A ‘‘significant energy action’’ is defined
as any action by an agency that
promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that:
(1) Is a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866, or any
successor order; and (2) is likely to have
a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy; or
(3) is designated by the Administrator of
OIRA as a significant energy action. For
any proposed significant energy action,
the agency must give a detailed
statement of any adverse effects on
energy supply, distribution, or use
should the proposal be implemented,
and of reasonable alternatives to the
action and their expected benefits on
energy supply, distribution, and use.
This final rule will not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy and,
therefore, is not a significant energy
action. Accordingly, DOE has not
prepared a Statement of Energy Effects.
V. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
report to Congress on the promulgation
of this rule prior to its effective date.
The report will state that it has been
determined that the rule is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VI. Approval of the Office of the
Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of today’s final rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Parts 436
Energy conservation, Federal
buildings and facilities, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Solar
energy.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5,
2009.
Rita L. Wells,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Business Administration, Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, DOE is amending Chapter II
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below.
■
PART 436—FEDERAL ENERGY
MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 436
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
8258; 42 U.S.C. 8259b.
2. Subpart C is added to part 436 to
read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10835
Subpart C—Agency Procurement of
Energy Efficient Products
Sec.
436.40 Purpose and scope.
436.41 Definitions.
436.42 Evaluation of Life-Cycle Cost
Effectiveness
436.43 Procurement Planning.
§ 436.40
Purpose and scope.
This subpart provides guidance to
promote the procurement of energy
efficient products by Federal agencies
and promote procurement practices
which facilitate the procurement of
energy efficient products, consistent
with the requirements in section 553 of
the National Energy Conservation Policy
Act. (42 U.S.C. 8259b)
§ 436.41
Definitions.
Agency means each authority of the
Government of the United States,
whether or not it is within or subject to
review by another agency, but does not
include—
(1) The Congress, and agencies
thereof;
(2) The courts of the United States;
(3) The governments of the territories
or possessions of the United States; or
(4) The government of the District of
Columbia.
Covered product means a product that
is of a category for which an ENERGY
STAR qualification or FEMP
designation is established.
ENERGY STAR qualified product
means a product that is rated for energy
efficiency under an ENERGY STAR
program established by section 324A of
the Energy Policy and Conservation Act
(42 U.S.C. 6294a).
FEMP designated product means a
product that is designated under the
Federal Energy Management Program as
being among the highest 25 percent of
equivalent products for energy
efficiency.
§ 436.42 Evaluation of Life-Cycle Cost
Effectiveness.
For the purpose of compliance with
section 553 of the National Energy
Conservation Policy Act:
(a) ENERGY STAR qualified and
FEMP designated products may be
assumed to be life-cycle cost-effective.
(b) In making a determination that a
covered product is not life-cycle costeffective, an agency should rely on the
life-cycle cost analysis method in part
436, subpart A, of title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations.
§ 436.43
Procurement planning.
(a) Agencies should consider the
procurement planning requirements of
section 553 of the National Energy
Conservation Policy Act as applying to:
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
10836
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Design, design/build, renovation,
retrofit and services contracts; facility
maintenance and operations contracts;
(2) Energy savings performance
contracts and utility energy service
contracts;
(3) If applicable, lease agreements for
buildings or equipment, including
build-to-lease contracts;
(b) Agencies should require the
procurement of ENERGY STAR and
FEMP designated products in new
service contracts and other existing
service contracts as they are recompeted
and should, to the extent possible,
incorporate such requirements and
preferences into existing contracts as
they are modified or extended through
options.
(c) Agencies should include criteria
for energy efficiency that are consistent
with the criteria used for rating
qualified products in the factors for the
evaluation of:
(1) Offers received for procurements
involving covered products, and
(2) Offers received for construction,
renovation, and services contracts that
include provisions for covered products.
(d) Agencies should notify their
vendors of the Federal requirements for
energy efficient purchasing.
[FR Doc. E9–5459 Filed 3–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 232, 239, 249, 269 and
274
[Release Nos. 33–9013, 34–59536, 39–2463,
IC–28642]
Attaching Authenticating Documents
to Online Form ID Applications
yshivers on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting rule and
form amendments that allow applicants
for EDGAR access codes using Form ID
to submit their authenticating
documents by attaching them to their
online Form ID applications in Portable
Document Format (PDF) as an
alternative to submitting the documents
by fax.
DATES: Effective Date: March 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Corey Jennings, Special Counsel, at
(202) 551–3258, for information on legal
issues, or Cecile Peters, Chief,
Information Technology Office, (202)
551–3600, for information on technical
issues, Division of Corporation Finance,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:40 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20459–3628.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
adopting amendments that will revise
Rules 10 1 and 101 2 under Regulation
S–T 3 and Form ID.4
I. Background
Form ID is used to apply for access
codes to file information electronically
through the Commission’s Electronic
Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval
or ‘‘EDGAR’’ system. EDGAR access
codes include a CIK (Central Index Key)
number, which serves as a permanent,
public filer identification number, as
well as confidential security codes.
Applicants submitting Form ID
applications must submit them online.
They also must fax to the Commission
a notarized document containing the
same information as contained in the
Form ID application. The additional
document is called an ‘‘authenticating
document.’’ Commission staff matches
applicants’ online submissions with
their faxed authenticating documents
before approving the Form ID
application and allowing applicants to
generate their EDGAR access codes.5
Today, we adopt amendments that
allow Form ID applicants to submit
their authenticating documents as PDF
attachments to their online Form ID
applications. This provides an
alternative method to submitting the
authenticating documents by fax. The
use of a PDF attachment may provide a
simpler and easier method for some
applicants to submit their
authenticating documents. Filers can
use a fillable PDF version of Form ID
available on the Commission’s Web site
to create and print the document. For
Form ID applications with the
authenticating documents attached,
Commission staff will no longer have to
match faxed authenticating documents
manually with online submissions. This
alternative method should enhance the
processing efficiency of these Form ID
applications. The amendments do not
impose any new burdens or
requirements on Form ID applicants or
others.
The effective date of the new rules,
March 16, 2009, coincides with the
effective date of our new rules requiring
that Form D filings be made online,
through the Internet, using the EDGAR
1 17
CFR 232.10.
CFR 232.101.
3 17 CFR 232.10 et seq.
4 17 CFR 239.63, 249.446, 269.7 and 274.402.
5 We approved this process in Release No. 33–
8410 (Apr. 21, 2004) [69 FR 22704 (Apr. 26, 2004)],
available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/338410.htm.
2 17
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
system.6 At the time we adopted the
new Form D rules, we estimated they
would result in an increase of
approximately 20,000, or 40%, in the
number of Form ID applications that we
receive annually.7 Although many Form
ID applicants will be applying for
EDGAR access codes to make filings
other than Form D filings, the increased
efficiency in use of Commission staff
resources will benefit all applicants. We
expect adoption of the Form ID
amendments should assist the staff in
better managing the expected increase
in Form ID applications resulting from
the Form D amendments.
At the time we adopted the Form D
amendments, we acknowledged concern
over the burdens of the Form ID
authentication process, particularly in
the context of mandating Form D online
filing.8 We stated that we planned to
consider ways to simplify the Form ID
authentication process before Form D
online filing became mandatory on
March 16, 2009.9 The Form ID
amendments we adopt today address
concerns over the burdens of the Form
ID authentication process. They make
the process simpler and easier for some
applicants. We are hopeful that the
increased Commission staff efficiency in
processing Form ID applications with
attached authenticating documents will
allow Form ID applicants to get their
EDGAR access codes more quickly.
However, we continue to study ways to
further streamline the process.
II. Discussion of the Amendments
A. Optional Attachment of
Authenticating Document to Online
Form ID Application
We are adopting minor revisions to
Regulation S–T 10 to allow applicants
for EDGAR access codes using Form ID
to attach their required authenticating
document electronically as a PDF
document to their online Form ID
6 We adopted the rules requiring online filing of
Form D information in Release No. 33–8891 (Feb.
6, 2008) [73 FR 10592 (Feb. 27, 2008)], available at
https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2008/33-8891.pdf.
7 See id. at 70 [73 FR 10610]. We expect an
increase because Form D filings previously were
made only in paper format, and no Form ID filings
were required because filers do not need EDGAR
access codes to make paper filings.
8 Id. at 58 [73 FR 10607].
9 Id. at 59–60 [73 FR 10607–10608].
10 Regulation S–T is the general regulation
governing electronic filing of information with the
Commission. In addition to complying with
Regulation S–T, filers must submit electronic filings
in accordance with the instructions in the
Commission’s EDGAR Filer Manual. We also are
amending the EDGAR Filer Manual to reflect a
Form ID filer’s ability to attach a PDF copy of its
authenticating document to its online Form ID
application.
E:\FR\FM\13MRR1.SGM
13MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10830-10836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5459]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 436
RIN 1904-AB68
Federal Procurement of Energy Efficient Products
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) today publishes a final
rule to promote Federal procurement of energy-efficient products. The
final rule establishes guidelines for Federal agencies regarding the
implementation of amendments to the National Energy Conservation Policy
Act (NECPA) that require Federal agencies to procure ENERGY STAR
qualified and Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) designated
products in procurements involving energy consuming products and
systems. Today's final rule includes changes in response to comments
received on the notice of proposed rulemaking published June 19, 2007.
Most notably, today's final rule does not establish a reporting
requirement, as initially proposed, for federal agencies under
procurement requirement of NECPA.
DATES: This rule is effective April 13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical issues contact Mr. Cyrus
Nasseri, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Federal Energy Management Program, EE-2L, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121, (202) 586-9138, e-
mail: cyrus.nasseri@ee.doe.gov. For legal issues contact Mr. Chris
Calamita, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
Forrestal Building, GC-72, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington,
DC 20585, (202) 586-9507, e-mail: Christopher.Calamita@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction and Background
A. The Energy Policy Act of 2005
B. ENERGY STAR Qualified and FEMP Designated Products
C. Proposed Rule
D. Draft Guidance
II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule
A. Definition of ``Covered Product''
B. Reporting Agency Exceptions to the Procurement Requirement
C. Compliance With Section 553
D. Definition of Criteria for ENERGY STAR Qualification or FEMP
Designation
E. Supply Source for Excepted Procurement
III. DOE Guidance
A. Procurements
B. Procurement Planning
C. Exceptions
IV. Regulatory Review
A. National Environmental Policy Act
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
E. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999
F. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001
G. Executive Order 12866
H. Executive Order 12988
I. Executive Order 13132
J. Executive Order 13211
V. Congressional Notification
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
I. Introduction and Background
A. The Energy Policy Act of 2005
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT 2005) (Pub. L. 109-58; August
8, 2005), amended Part 3 of title V of NECPA (42 U.S.C. 8251-8259) by
adding section 553. Section 553 of NECPA requires each Federal agency
to procure ENERGY STAR qualified or FEMP designated products, unless
the head of the agency determines in writing that a statutory exception
applies. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)) Section 553 of NECPA was further amended
by section 525 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
(Pub. L. 140-110; December 19, 2007) to clarify that the procurement
requirement applies to the procurement of a product in a category
covered by the Energy Star program or the FEMP program for designated
products. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(1)) Further, each Federal agency is
required to incorporate into the specifications of all procurements
involving energy consuming products and systems, and into the factors
for evaluation of offers received for such procurements, criteria for
energy efficiency that are consistent with the criteria used for rating
ENERGY STAR qualified products and for rating FEMP designated products.
(42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(3))
Section 553 also requires that all inventories or listings of
products operated and maintained by the General Services Administration
(GSA) and the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) clearly identify and
prominently display ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products
in any listing or inventory of products, and it requires GSA and DLA to
supply only ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products in all
covered product categories, except in cases in which the head of the
agency ordering a product specifies in writing that an exception
applies. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(c))
Section 553 of NECPA contains two exceptions to the requirement to
procure only ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products, and it
excludes a specific category of energy consuming products from
coverage.
A procurement may be excepted if the head of an agency finds in
writing that either: (1) An ENERGY STAR qualified product or FEMP
designated product is not cost-effective over the life of the product
taking energy cost savings into account; or (2) no ENERGY STAR
qualified product or FEMP designated product is reasonably available
that meets the functional requirements of the agency. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(2)) In addition, section 553 excludes from the definition of
products subject to these requirements any energy consuming product or
system designed or procured for combat or combat-related missions. (42
U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5))
The subsection entitled ``REGULATIONS,'' section 553(f) of NECPA,
directs the Secretary of Energy to issue guidelines to carry out the
statute. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(f)) NECPA section 553 imposes procurement
requirements on agencies and additional requirements on GSA and DLA.
DOE does not need to issue regulations to implement those statutory
requirements. Moreover, DOE does not have the authority to change by
regulation the statutory procurement requirements that are applicable
to agencies or the additional requirements that govern GSA and DLA.
Consistent with the direction provided in section 553(f), today's
final rule amends 10 CFR part 436, Federal Energy Management and
Planning Programs, to establish guidelines for Federal agencies on
compliance with section 553.
[[Page 10831]]
B. ENERGY STAR Qualified and FEMP Designated Products
In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
introduced ENERGY STAR as a voluntary labeling program designed to
identify and promote energy efficient products, in part, to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
In response to Executive Order 12902, ``Energy Efficiency and Water
Conservation at Federal Facilities,'' (59 FR 11463; March 8, 1994)
twenty-two federal agencies signed an agreement in 1994 to shift their
purchasing of energy-using products to the best 25% of models on the
market. Products that were labeled with the ENERGY STAR logo met this
requirement. The Department of Energy's Federal Energy Management
Program (FEMP) provided additional guidance to Federal agencies to
identify efficient products not covered by the ENERGY STAR program,
i.e., FEMP designated products.
In 1999, the partnership between EPA and DOE was furthered by
Executive Order 13123, ``Greening the Government Through Efficient
Energy Management,'' which directed EPA and DOE to expedite the process
of designating products as ENERGY STAR qualified and to merge their
efficiency rating procedures. 64 FR 30851; June 8, 1999. Executive
Order 13123 was replaced with Executive Order 13423, ``Strengthening
Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management,'' which
requires, among other things, that in acquisitions of goods and
services Federal agencies use sustainable environmental practices,
including acquisition of bio-based, environmentally preferable, energy-
efficient, water-efficient, and recycled-content products. 72 FR 3919;
January 26, 2007.
In EPACT 2005, Congress established statutory parameters for the
ENERGY STAR program. (42 U.S.C. 6294a) The statute prescribes the
program duties of the Administrator of EPA and the Secretary of Energy;
requires the solicitation of public comment before an ENERGY STAR
product category, specification or criterion is established or revised;
and establishes a lead time before a new or significant revision of a
product category, specification, or criterion may become effective.
EPACT 2005 also reaffirmed the authority of the Federal Energy
Management Program to identify a product as being ``among the highest
25 percent of equivalent products for energy efficiency.'' (42 U.S.C.
8259b(a)(4))
Currently, ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products cover
62 types of products in the following categories: (1) Lighting; (2)
commercial and industrial equipment; (3) food service equipment; (4)
office equipment; (5) home electronics; (6) appliances; (7) residential
equipment; (8) plumbing; and (9) construction products. ENERGY STAR
qualified and FEMP designated products have been determined to be life-
cycle cost-effective in normal usage. However, purchasers are
encouraged to evaluate products according to their specific
applications and circumstances. Life-cycle cost calculators for many of
the ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products can be accessed
at:https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/procurement/eep_eccalculators.html.
C. Proposed Rule
As discussed above, NECPA section 553(f), entitled ``REGULATIONS,''
directs DOE to issue guidelines to carry out the section. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(e)) On June 19, 2007, DOE published a notice of proposed
rulemaking that proposed a reporting requirement to track agency
compliance with the procurement requirements established in section 553
of NECPA. 72 FR 33696; June 19, 2007. DOE also published draft guidance
to assist Federal agencies in complying with the procurement
requirements established in section 553.
NECPA section 553 applies to the procurement of energy consuming
products. Section 553 defines ``product'' as excluding energy consuming
products or systems designed or procured for combat or combat-related
missions. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(5)) For the purpose of the reporting
requirement, the proposed rule relied on the term ``covered product,''
i.e., a product or system that is in a category covered by the ENERGY
STAR or FEMP program. Covered products are those energy consuming
products that the ENERGY STAR or FEMP programs determined to hold the
greatest promise for energy savings. Within these product categories,
there is typically a broad range of life-cycle costs associated with
the products. ENERGY STAR and FEMP identify those products with lower
life-cycle costs for federal buyers. Both programs will continue to
review market trends and product availability, and may determine that
additional products should be added to the list of covered products.
Section 553(a)(1) specifies a definition of agency that includes an
agency under any branch of the Government (including a congressional
agency). (42 U.S.C. 8259b(a)(1)) The proposed rule defined ``agency''
consistent with the definition contained in Title 5 of the United
States Code, which essentially limits the term ``agency'' to those
under the Executive Branch. (5 U.S.C. 551(1)) DOE initially determined
that the inclusion of non-Executive Branch agencies under the
definition in section 553(a)(1) of NECPA was inappropriate for a
regulation promulgated by DOE given DOE's authority. 72 FR 33697.
Moreover, the definition of ``agency'' in 5 U.S.C. 551(1) is
incorporated by reference into subchapter III, Federal Energy
Initiative, of Chapter 91 of Title 42 of the United States Code, which
includes section 553. DOE noted that the other branches of the
Government may, at their discretion, rely on DOE's regulation and
guidance in implementing section 553.
As stated above, section 553 of NECPA contains two exceptions to
the requirement to procure only ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products. In order to track exceptions, DOE proposed
reporting requirements to track the exception findings made by agency
heads. DOE initially determined that information regarding the
procurement of products for which an exception was necessary would help
DOE and EPA determine if there is a need for revisions to ENERGY STAR
qualified or FEMP designated products. DOE has determined that existing
reporting and tracking mechanisms provide an adequate means to collect
and analyze information regarding agency procurement of these products.
D. Draft Guidance
In the preamble to the proposed rule, DOE provided draft guidance
on compliance with the procurement requirements set forth in section
553 of NECPA. As discussed previously in this document, section 553(b)
requires that when agencies procure energy consuming products, either
directly or through part of a larger contract (e.g., construction,
renovation, and service or maintenance contracts) that they procure
either an ENERGY STAR qualified product or a FEMP designated product.
(42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(1)) Section 553(c) requires GSA and DLA to clearly
identify and prominently display ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products in any inventory or listing of products by these
agencies and that they supply only ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP
designated products when appropriate. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(c))
DOE encourages agencies other than GSA and DLA that operate
procurement ordering systems to achieve the goals of section 553.
[[Page 10832]]
Comments were received on the draft guidance provided in the notice
of proposed rulemaking. The discussion below responds to those comments
and provides guidance for Federal agencies in complying with section
553.
II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule
Today's final rule contains a number of changes from the proposed
rule. Most significantly, the final rule does not include a reporting
requirement. The changes are discussed below.
DOE received thirteen comments in response to the notice of
proposed rulemaking. The comments covered the following topics:
Definition of products covered under the rule--specifically, whether a
product must itself be ``energy consuming'' to be considered a
``covered product''; reporting of exceptions granted by each agency;
responsibilities of agencies to define procedures to comply with NECPA
section 553 requirements; and criteria determining whether a product
meets the requirement of ``Energy Star-qualified or FEMP-designated.''
DOE received several comments in support of the proposed rule.
A. Definition of ``Covered Product''
Several commenters raised issues concerning the definition of
covered product. (See comments from Single Ply Roofing Industry, Duro-
Last Roofing, Information Technology Industry Council, Chemical Fabrics
& Film Association, Inc., Sika Sarnafil, Inc.) Commenters suggested
that the definition of ``covered product'' be expanded to include all
products for which an ENERGY STAR qualification or a FEMP designation
is established.
Discussion of the term ``product'' in the preamble of the notice of
proposed rulemaking was in the context of ``energy consuming''
products. 72 FR 33697; June 19, 2007. However, in the proposed
regulatory text, ``covered product'' was defined more broadly as ``a
product that is of a category for which an ENERGY STAR qualification or
FEMP designation is established.'' The ENERGY STAR categories cover
products that do not consume energy, such as windows and roofing
materials.
DOE is maintaining the definition of ``covered product'' as in the
proposed regulatory text. The definition of ``covered product'' for the
purpose of the regulation includes any product that is of a category
for which an ENERGY STAR qualification or FEMP designation is
established. However, the statutory procurement requirements apply only
to the procurement of products as set forth in section 553 of NECPA.
(42 U.S.C. 8259b) As noted above, section 553 of NECPA, as recently
amended, specifies that the requirement applies to the procurement of
an energy consuming product in a product category covered by the Energy
Star Program or the FEMP program for designating products. (42 U.S.C.
8259b(b)(1)) The definition of ``covered product'' established in
today's final rule clarifies that the requirements under section 553 of
NECPA apply only with regard to energy consuming products that are of a
product category covered by the Energy Star Program or the FEMP program
for designating products.
The Information Technology Industry Council stated that it was
unclear what the term ``category'' meant in the definition of covered
product. The ENERGY STAR and FEMP programs apply to specified types of
products, i.e., categories. A listing of the product categories covered
by the ENERGY STAR program can be found at https://www.energystar.gov/
index.cfm?fuseaction=find_a_product.
Currently, there is no companion list of FEMP designated products,
but the FEMP specifications for energy efficiency products are located
at https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/procurement/eep_requirements.html.
B. Reporting Agency Exceptions to the Procurement Requirement
Several comments were received regarding the perceived burdens of
requiring agencies to report information regarding the finding of an
exception under section 553(b)(2) of NECPA. (See comments from Office
of Federal Environmental Executive; Department of Justice; Department
of Commerce). These commenters indicated that the reporting requirement
included in the notice of proposed rulemaking would be unduly
burdensome on agencies.
DOE recognizes that there are several existing reporting
requirements through which DOE can obtain information on exceptions
found under section 533 of NECPA, without the need to establish a
separate reporting requirement through regulation. Specifically,
Federal agencies are currently required to provide information for
DOE's annual report on energy use and the Office of Federal Procurement
Policy's annual report on green purchasing requirements. DOE will
coordinate with the Office of Management and Budget to incorporate
information regarding the finding of exemptions under section 533 of
NECPA as part of the data collected for the these annual reports. By
relying on existing reporting schemes, DOE avoids any potential
redundancy in reporting requirements for Federal agencies. Therefore,
DOE is not establishing a reporting requirement in today's final rule.
C. Compliance With Section 553
Several comments were received regarding agency compliance with the
procurement requirements in section 553 of NECPA. Specifically, some of
these comments requested that DOE establish regulations:
--Establishing requirements for GSA and DLA to identify energy-
efficient products (comment from Alliance to Save Energy);
--Specifying how agencies are to determine the cost-effectiveness of
products for the purpose of an exception finding (comments from Office
of Federal Environmental Executive; Information Technologies Industry
Council; and Department of Veterans Affairs); and
--Providing additional exceptions that may be available to Federal
agencies (comments from Office of Federal Environmental Executive and
Department of Veterans Affairs).
As stated above, DOE has determined that the procurement requirements
and the product listing requirements of section 553 of NECPA are self-
executing. However, today's final rule codifies the guidance provided
in the preamble of the notice of proposed rulemaking and this document.
Placing the guidance in the Code of Federal Regulations, agencies
should be able to more readily access the guidance.
With regard to a finding under the exception provision in section
553(b)(2), each agency should develop a process for evaluating its
individual product needs. In the guidance section below, DOE does
provide guidance on how an agency may evaluate the cost-effectiveness
of a product.
The exception provision in section 553 provides specific criteria
for determining when such an exception finding can be made. Section 553
does not include provisions granting exceptions beyond those enumerated
in that section. While section 553 specifies that a finding of an
exception is to be made by the head of an agency, agencies may
consider, as appropriate, the delegation of the exception authority to
other officials within the agency.
D. Definition of Criteria for ENERGY STAR Qualification or FEMP
Designation
One comment (comment from Arkansas Lamp Manufacturing) dealt with
the mechanism by which the ENERGY STAR program determines the
[[Page 10833]]
criteria by which ENERGY STAR qualified products are identified. This
process is beyond the scope of this regulation. Moreover, as noted
above, EPACT 2005 established statutory parameters for the ENERGY STAR
program. (42 U.S.C. 6294a)
Another comment (comment from Information Technology Industry
Council) dealt with the distinction between a product meeting the
functional requirements contained in the technical specifications for
ENERGY STAR products and a product that is ENERGY STAR qualified. The
language of section 553 of NECPA requires federal agencies to procure
an ENERGY STAR qualified product; i.e., a product manufactured by a
full participant in the ENERGY STAR program. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(1)(A)) A
product must be ENERGY STAR qualified to meet the procurement
requirements; functional performance alone is not sufficient.
E. Supply Source for Excepted Procurement
One comment (comment from Alliance to Save Energy) requested that
DOE require the federal supply sources (GSA and DLA) to verify that
customers had prepared a written exception before supplying a covered
product that is not ENERGY STAR qualified or FEMP designated. As
discussed above, DOE does not have the authority to change by
regulation the statutory requirements that govern GSA and DLA.
III. DOE Guidance
Section 533(e) of NECPA, titled ``Regulations'', directs DOE to
issue guidelines to carry out the procurement requirements of that
section. As indicated previously in this document, DOE is codifying, to
the extent practical, the guidance provided in the preamble of the
notice of proposed rulemaking and this document. As noted, the guidance
provided in the Code of Federal Regulations, should be more readily
accessible to agencies, as opposed to guidance provided only in the
Federal Register.
A. Procurements
Requirements for Federal procurement are governed, in part, by the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). (48 CFR part 1 et seq.). On
November 23, 2007, the FAR requirements were revised to reflect the
requirements in section 553 of NECPA. 72 FR 65868; Nov. 23, 2007. DOE
has worked closely with members of the FAR Council to ensure a
consistency between today's final rule and the recent FAR revision.
Federal agencies are generally required to procure an ENERGY STAR
qualified or FEMP designated product whenever procuring a covered
product. Additionally, products furnished by contractors while
performing at a federally controlled facility should be qualified
products regardless of whether the government receives title at the end
of contract performance.
A list of product categories, which contain ENERGY STAR qualified
and FEMP designed products, is located at https://www.eere.energy.gov/
femp/pdfs/eep_productfactsheet.pdf.
To identify actual products that are ENERGY STAR rated, potential
purchasers can go to https://www.energystar.gov/products.
Currently, there is no companion list of FEMP designated products,
but the FEMP specifications for energy efficiency products are located
at https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/procurement/eep_requirements.html.
B. Procurement Planning
In addition to establishing requirements for the actual procurement
of certain products, section 553(b)(3) directs heads of agencies to
incorporate into the specifications for all procurements involving
covered products criteria for energy efficiency that are consistent
with the criteria used to rate ENERGY STAR products and FEMP designated
products. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(3)) This requirement applies to general
specifications, project specifications, and construction, renovation
and service contracts that involve the procurement of covered products.
Agencies should consider this requirement to apply to:
Design, design/build, renovation, retrofit and services
contracts; facility maintenance and operations contracts; as well as
energy savings performance contracts and utility energy service
contracts.
If applicable, lease agreements for buildings or
equipment, including build-to-lease contracts, such as those used to
implement the Military Housing Privatization Initiative.
Further, agencies should require the procurement of ENERGY STAR and
FEMP designated products in new service contracts and other existing
service contracts as they are recompeted and should, to the extent
possible, incorporate such requirements and preferences into existing
contracts as they are modified or extended through options.
As directed by section 553(b)(3), Federal agencies should include
criteria for energy efficiency that are consistent with the criteria
used for rating qualified products in the factors for the evaluation
of:
Offers received for procurements involving covered
products, and
Offers received for construction, renovation, and services
contracts that include provisions for covered products.
Agencies should notify their vendors of the Federal requirements
for energy efficient purchasing.
Guidance is available for developing model contract language for
contracts which involve covered products. Model contract language for
all ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products can be found at
https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/procurement/eep_modellang.html.
Moreover, there are guide specification requirements which have already
been incorporated in existing specifications such as the Unified
Facilities Guide Specifications, which are available at https://
www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse_org.php?o=70, and EPA's Federal Guide for
Green Construction Specifications, which is available at https://
www.wbdg.org/design/greenspec.php.
Further, FEMP offers a series of training opportunities for
procurement staff that are listed at https://www.eere.energy.gov/femp/
services/training_catalog.html. New classes are periodically added to
the Web site. Procurement officials are encouraged to take advantage of
these training opportunities, which can provide a useful context to
understand the benefits of energy efficient technologies and the
innovative financing strategies available to fund them.
Although energy consuming products or systems that are designed or
procured for combat or combat-related missions are not subject to the
requirements of this subpart (see Sec. 436.40 of this subpart), DOE
encourages the Department of Defense to incorporate energy efficiency
criteria into procurements of combat-related equipment, to the extent
practicable.
C. Exceptions
As stated above, section 553 provides for exceptions to the
procurement requirements. Under the statute, an agency may only procure
an energy consuming product that is not an ENERGY STAR qualified or
FEMP designated product if the head of the agency finds in writing that
an exception applies. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)) Under section 553(b)(2) a
written exception can only be made if one of two criteria are met. (42
U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)) The first criterion requires an agency head to find
that a product is not life-cycle cost-effective in the
[[Page 10834]]
application for which it will be used. (42 U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)(A))
Although ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products are life-
cycle cost-effective under normal use conditions, they may not be if
used in a specialized way or for very limited hours. When making a
determination that a product is not life-cycle cost-effective, an
agency should rely on the life-cycle cost analysis method in part 436,
subpart A, of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or another
method determined by the agency to be equivalent.
The second criterion requires an agency head to find that there is
no ENERGY STAR qualified or FEMP designated product reasonably
available that meets the functional requirements of the agency. (42
U.S.C. 8259b(b)(2)(B))
IV. Regulatory Review
A. Executive Order 12866
Today's final rule has been determined not to be a ``significant
regulatory action'' under section 3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review. (58 FR 51735; October 4, 1993).
B. National Environmental Policy Act
DOE has determined that this rule is covered under the Categorical
Exclusion found in DOE's National Environmental Policy Act regulations
at paragraph A.6 of Appendix A to subpart D, 10 CFR part 1021. That
Categorical Exclusion applies to rulemakings that are strictly
procedural, such as rulemaking establishing a reporting requirement
applicable to contracting practices for the purchase of goods and
services. The rule establishes guidance for Federal agencies with
regard to the requirements of section 553 to procure energy efficient
products and develop procurement practices which facilitate the
purchase of energy efficient products.
The rule would not establish any procurement requirements.
Accordingly, DOE has not prepared an environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires the
preparation of an initial regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule
that by law must be proposed for public comment, unless the agency
certifies that the rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
As required by Executive Order 13272, ``Proper Consideration of
Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking,'' (67 FR 53461; August 16, 2002),
DOE published procedures and policies on February 19, 2003, to ensure
that the potential impacts of its rules on small entities are properly
considered during the rulemaking process. 68 FR 7990; Feb. 19, 2003.
The Department has made its procedures and policies available on the
Office of General Counsel's Web site: https://www.gc.doe.gov.
DOE has reviewed today's rule under the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act and the procedures and policies published on
February 19, 2003. Today's final rule applies only to Federal agencies.
Today's final rule will not impact small entities. In addition, the
final rule only facilitates Federal agency compliance with a statutory
mandate to procure ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products.
On the basis of the foregoing, DOE certifies that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a regulatory flexibility
analysis for this rulemaking. This certification and supporting
statement of factual basis will be provided to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
605(b).
D. Paperwork Reduction Act
No new record keeping requirements, subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., are imposed by this final rule.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) generally
requires Federal agencies to examine closely the impacts of regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal governments, or the private sector.
Subsection 101(5) of title I of that law defines a Federal
intergovernmental mandate to include any regulation that would impose
upon State, local, or tribal governments an enforceable duty, except a
condition of Federal assistance or a duty arising from participating in
a voluntary Federal program. Title II of that law requires each Federal
agency to assess the effects of Federal regulatory actions on State,
local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private
sector, other than to the extent such actions merely incorporate
requirements specifically set forth in a statute. Section 202 of that
title requires a Federal agency to perform a detailed assessment of the
anticipated costs and benefits of any rule that includes a Federal
mandate which may result in costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more.
Section 204 of that title requires each agency that proposes a rule
containing a significant Federal intergovernmental mandate to develop
an effective process for obtaining meaningful and timely input from
elected officers of State, local, and tribal governments.
This rule does not impose a Federal mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector. Accordingly, no assessment or
analysis is required under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
F. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277) requires Federal agencies to issue a Family
Policymaking Assessment for any rule that may affect family well-being.
This final rule will not have any impact on the autonomy or
integrity of the family as an institution. Accordingly, DOE has
concluded that it is not necessary to prepare a Family Policymaking
Assessment.
G. Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 2001 (44
U.S.C. 3516 note) provides for agencies to review most disseminations
of information to the public under guidelines established by each
agency pursuant to general guidelines issued by OMB. OMB's guidelines
were published at 67 FR 8452 (February 22, 2002). DOE's guidelines were
published at 67 FR 62446 (October 7, 2002).
DOE has reviewed today's final rule under the OMB and DOE
guidelines and has concluded that it is consistent with applicable
policies in those guidelines.
H. Executive Order 12988
With respect to the review of existing regulations and the
promulgation of new regulations, section 3(a) of Executive Order 12988,
``Civil Justice Reform,'' (61 FR 4729; February 7, 1996), imposes on
Executive agencies the general duty to adhere to the following
requirements: (1) Eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity; (2) write
regulations to minimize litigation; and (3) provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard and
promote simplification and burden reduction. Section 3(b) of Executive
Order 12988 specifically requires that Executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies
the preemptive effect, if any; (2) clearly
[[Page 10835]]
specifies any effect on existing Federal law or regulation; (3)
provides a clear legal standard for affected conduct while promoting
simplification and burden reduction; (4) specifies the retroactive
effect, if any; (5) adequately defines key terms; and (6) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship
under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. Section 3(c) of
Executive Order 12988 requires Executive agencies to review regulations
in light of applicable standards in section 3(a) and section 3(b) to
determine whether they are met or it is unreasonable to meet one or
more of them.
DOE has completed the required review and determined that, to the
extent permitted by law, this rule meets the relevant standards of
Executive Order 12988.
I. Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' (64 FR 43255; August 4,
1999), imposes certain requirements on agencies formulating and
implementing policies or regulations that preempt State law or that
have federalism implications. The Executive Order requires agencies to
examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any
action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and
to carefully assess the necessity for such actions. The Executive Order
also requires agencies to have an accountable process to ensure
meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.
On March 14, 2000, DOE published a statement of policy describing the
intergovernmental consultation process it will follow in the
development of such regulations. 65 FR 13735; Mar. 14, 2000.
DOE has examined this rule and determined that it does not preempt
State law and does not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of Government. No further action is required by Executive Order
13132.
J. Executive Order 13211
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,'' 66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001) requires Federal agencies to prepare and submit to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of
Management and Budget, a Statement of Energy Effects for any proposed
significant energy action. A ``significant energy action'' is defined
as any action by an agency that promulgated or is expected to lead to
promulgation of a final rule, and that: (1) Is a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, or any successor order; and (2) is
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy; or (3) is designated by the
Administrator of OIRA as a significant energy action. For any proposed
significant energy action, the agency must give a detailed statement of
any adverse effects on energy supply, distribution, or use should the
proposal be implemented, and of reasonable alternatives to the action
and their expected benefits on energy supply, distribution, and use.
This final rule will not have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy and, therefore, is not a
significant energy action. Accordingly, DOE has not prepared a
Statement of Energy Effects.
V. Congressional Notification
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will report to Congress on the
promulgation of this rule prior to its effective date. The report will
state that it has been determined that the rule is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VI. Approval of the Office of the Secretary
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of today's final
rule.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Parts 436
Energy conservation, Federal buildings and facilities, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Solar energy.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5, 2009.
Rita L. Wells,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Business Administration, Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DOE is amending Chapter II
of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below.
PART 436--FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 436 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 8258; 42 U.S.C.
8259b.
0
2. Subpart C is added to part 436 to read as follows:
Subpart C--Agency Procurement of Energy Efficient Products
Sec.
436.40 Purpose and scope.
436.41 Definitions.
436.42 Evaluation of Life-Cycle Cost Effectiveness
436.43 Procurement Planning.
Sec. 436.40 Purpose and scope.
This subpart provides guidance to promote the procurement of energy
efficient products by Federal agencies and promote procurement
practices which facilitate the procurement of energy efficient
products, consistent with the requirements in section 553 of the
National Energy Conservation Policy Act. (42 U.S.C. 8259b)
Sec. 436.41 Definitions.
Agency means each authority of the Government of the United States,
whether or not it is within or subject to review by another agency, but
does not include--
(1) The Congress, and agencies thereof;
(2) The courts of the United States;
(3) The governments of the territories or possessions of the United
States; or
(4) The government of the District of Columbia.
Covered product means a product that is of a category for which an
ENERGY STAR qualification or FEMP designation is established.
ENERGY STAR qualified product means a product that is rated for
energy efficiency under an ENERGY STAR program established by section
324A of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6294a).
FEMP designated product means a product that is designated under
the Federal Energy Management Program as being among the highest 25
percent of equivalent products for energy efficiency.
Sec. 436.42 Evaluation of Life-Cycle Cost Effectiveness.
For the purpose of compliance with section 553 of the National
Energy Conservation Policy Act:
(a) ENERGY STAR qualified and FEMP designated products may be
assumed to be life-cycle cost-effective.
(b) In making a determination that a covered product is not life-
cycle cost-effective, an agency should rely on the life-cycle cost
analysis method in part 436, subpart A, of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Sec. 436.43 Procurement planning.
(a) Agencies should consider the procurement planning requirements
of section 553 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act as
applying to:
[[Page 10836]]
(1) Design, design/build, renovation, retrofit and services
contracts; facility maintenance and operations contracts;
(2) Energy savings performance contracts and utility energy service
contracts;
(3) If applicable, lease agreements for buildings or equipment,
including build-to-lease contracts;
(b) Agencies should require the procurement of ENERGY STAR and FEMP
designated products in new service contracts and other existing service
contracts as they are recompeted and should, to the extent possible,
incorporate such requirements and preferences into existing contracts
as they are modified or extended through options.
(c) Agencies should include criteria for energy efficiency that are
consistent with the criteria used for rating qualified products in the
factors for the evaluation of:
(1) Offers received for procurements involving covered products,
and
(2) Offers received for construction, renovation, and services
contracts that include provisions for covered products.
(d) Agencies should notify their vendors of the Federal
requirements for energy efficient purchasing.
[FR Doc. E9-5459 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P