Union Pacific Railroad Company-Petition for Declaratory Order, 10991-10992 [E9-5456]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Notices
S.P No.
S.P No.
Applicant
Regulation(s)
10991
Nature of special permit thereof
DENIED
8006–M ........
14742–N ......
14774–N ......
14730–N ......
Request by JA–RU, Inc., Jacksonville, FL, February 25, 2009. To modify the special permit to authorize the transportation in
commerce of certain toy caps by JaRu customers between their distribution centers and their retail stores without meeting the
marking and packaging requirements.
Request by Strong Environmental, Inc., Norcross, GA, October 01, 2008. To authorize the manufacture, marking, sale and use
of a UN standard 4G fiberboard box for use as the outer packaging for lab pack applications in accordance with § 173.12(b).
Request by Mercury Marine, Fond du Lac, WI, January 13, 2009. To authorize the transportation in commerce of internal combustion engines that contain small amounts of hazardous materials residue by cargo vessel.
Request by ITW Military Products, Waterbury, CT, August 12, 2008.
11827–M ......
...........................
NRS Logistics, White
Plains, NY.
Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C., Flanders, NJ.
49 CFR 180.605(c)(1);
180.352(b)(3).
49 CFR 172.102(c) Special Provision 36.
14729–N ......
...........................
14738–N ......
...........................
49 CFR 171.8 .................
...........................
Bridgeview Aerosol, LLC,
Bridgeview, IL.
Source Production &
Equipment Co., Inc.,
St. Rose, LA.
14775–N ......
14804–N ......
...........................
Cordstrap USA, Inc.,
Racine, WI.
49 CFR 174.55(a) ..........
EE 14783–N
...........................
New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, Albany,
NY.
49 CFR 173.240,
173.241.
[FR Doc. E9–5005 Filed 3–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35219]
Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Petition for Declaratory Order
Surface Transportation Board.
Institution of declaratory order
proceeding; request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: In response to a petition filed
by Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP) on February 18, 2009, the Board is
instituting a declaratory order
proceeding under 49 U.S.C. 721 and 5
U.S.C. 554(e).1 UP requests that the
Board determine the extent of the
common carrier obligation to quote rates
for new, lengthy movements of chlorine,
a toxic inhalation hazard (TIH), where
the transportation would require
movement through High Threat Urban
Areas (HTUAs) 2 and other large
communities to destinations where,
1 By a separate decision served on March 10,
2009, the Board issued a protective order in this
proceeding.
2 As UP refers to them, HTUAs are defined by the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at 49
CFR 1580.3.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:55 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
49 CFR 173.416 .............
To modify the special permit to authorize rail
cargo as an approved transportation.
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
certain waste medicines in packagings that exceed the maximum authorized net quantity as
required by Special Provision 36 when transported by motor vehicle. (mode 1)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
pure compressed gas as an ‘aerosol.’ (mode 1)
To authorize the continued transportation in commerce of one 2OWC packaging containing radioactive material after October 1, 2008. (mode
1)
To authorize the use of a corded polyester lashing
securement system for blocking and bracing
hazardous materials transported by rail. (mode
2)
To authorize the transportation in commerce of
PCB capacitors in non-DOT specification bulk
containers. (mode 1)
according to UP, an ample supply of
chlorine is available from nearby
sources. The Board seeks public
comment on this matter.
DATES: Replies to UP’s petition and
comments are due by March 31, 2009.
UP’s rebuttal and reply to comments are
due by April 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted either via the Board’s e-filing
format or in the traditional paper
format. Any person using e-filing should
attach a document and otherwise
comply with the instructions at the EFILING link on the Board’s website, at
https://www.stb.dot.gov. Any person
submitting a filing in the traditional
paper format should send an original
and 10 copies, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35219, to: Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, send one copy of comments to
UP’s representative, Tonya W. Conley,
Union Pacific Railroad Company, 1400
Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179.
Copies of written comments will be
available for viewing and self-copying at
the Board’s Public Docket Room, Room
131, and will be posted to the Board’s
Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Strafford, (202) 245–0356.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is
available through the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at: 1–
800–877–8339].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: UP, as a
rail common carrier, has an obligation
under 49 U.S.C. 11101(b) to provide
common carrier rates and other service
terms upon reasonable request. UP’s
petition for declaratory order seeks to
address a recent request from a
customer for common carriage rates for
the transportation of chlorine from Utah
to destinations in or near Houston and
Dallas, TX, and Allemania and
Plaquemine, LA. These movements
would average 1,900 miles in distance
and travel through two HTUAs and
several other large cities. UP declined to
quote rates for these movements,
pending the outcome of this proceeding,
because, according to UP, the risk of
potential exposure from long distance
shipments of chlorine is unnecessary
where all four of these destinations are
located less than 300 miles from ample
alternate chlorine supplies. UP asserts
that the facilities in both Allemania and
Plaquemine have alternate chlorine
sources accessible by rail within 70
miles, none of which will route through
any HTUAs, and that the facilities in
Houston and Dallas have alternative
chlorine sources within 300 miles, with
potential sources located in the Houston
metropolitan area. UP also asserts that
other governmental agencies have
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
10992
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 48 / Friday, March 13, 2009 / Notices
requested that it find ways to reduce
TIH shipments in order to reduce TIH
transportation risks.
On July 22, 2008, the Board held a
public hearing in STB Ex Parte 677
(Sub-No. 1) to examine issues related to
the common carrier obligation of
railroads with respect to the
transportation of hazardous materials.
Comments were filed in that proceeding
by the railroads (including UP) and TIH
shippers. Many of the comments
touched on the issues that are likely to
arise in this proceeding. Thus, the
parties that participated in STB Ex Parte
677 (Sub-No. 1) may have an interest in
the issues raised in this proceeding.
Under 5 U.S.C. 554(e), the Board has
discretionary authority to issue a
declaratory order to terminate a
controversy or remove uncertainty. A
declaratory order proceeding is thus
instituted in this proceeding to invite
broad public comment. Any person
seeking to comment on UP’s petition
may submit written comments to the
Board regarding the extent of UP’s
common carrier obligation to quote rates
for new, lengthy movements of chlorine,
where the transportation would require
movement through HTUAs and other
large communities to destinations where
an ample supply of chlorine may be
available from nearby sources.
In its petition, UP urges the Board to
consult with TSA and the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) because
UP suggests that a decision by the Board
in this proceeding could conflict with
TSA and FRA policies. Because the
Board’s consideration of the issues
raised by UP’s petition may relate to
statutes and regulations governed by
TSA, FRA, and other agencies, any
agency with an interest in the outcome
of these issues is encouraged to
comment.
Board decisions, notices, and filings
in this and other Board proceedings are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: March 10, 2009.
By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–5456 Filed 3–12–09; 8:45 am]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35224]
Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway
Company—Intra-Corporate Family
Lease Exemption—Illinois Central
Railroad Company
Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway
Company (EJ&E), a Class II rail common
carrier, filed a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3)
for an intra-corporate family lease of a
line of railroad of Illinois Central
Railroad Company (IC), a Class I rail
common carrier, in Will County, IL.1
Pursuant to the lease agreement entered
into by EJ&E and IC, EJ&E will lease
from IC a line of rail from milepost 41.0
to milepost 39.43, near Plaines, IL, a
distance of approximately 1.57 miles. IC
will retain its right to use the line to
serve any future industries on the line
and to access IC’s other rail operations
in the Joliet, IL area.
The transaction is scheduled to be
consummated on or shortly after March
29, 2009, the effective date of the
exemption.
The purpose of the transaction is to
allow EJ&E to store and spot railroad
cars delivered to a local power company
and thereby increase operating
efficiency.
This is a transaction within a
corporate family of the type specifically
exempted from prior review and
approval under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(3).
EJ&E states that the transaction will not
result in adverse changes in service
levels, significant operational changes,
or any change in the competitive
balance between IC/EJ&E and carriers
outside the CN corporate family.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. As a condition to the use of
this exemption, any employees
adversely affected by this transaction
will be protected by the conditions set
forth in Norfolk and Western Ry. Co.—
Trackage Rights—BN, 354 I.C.C. 605
(1978), as modified in Mendocino Coast
Ry., Inc.—Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C.
653 (1980).
If the notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
1 EJ&E and IC are wholly owned indirect
subsidiaries of Canadian National Railway
Corporation (CN).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:55 Mar 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
automatically stay the transaction.
Petitions for stay must be filed no later
than March 20, 2009 (at least 7 days
before the exemption becomes
effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35224, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, one copy of each
pleading must be served on Michael J.
Barron, Jr., Fletcher & Sippel LLC, 29
North Wacker Drive, Suite 920, Chicago,
IL 60606–2832.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: March 4, 2009.
By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9–5129 Filed 3–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35223]
Illinois Central Railroad Company—
Trackage Rights Exemption—
Wisconsin Central Ltd.
Pursuant to a written trackage rights
agreement entered into between Illinois
Central Railroad Company (IC) and
Wisconsin Central Ltd. (WC), IC has
agreed to grant non-exclusive overhead
and interchange trackage rights to WC
over IC’s line of railroad between
milepost 31.6 at University Park, IL
(Stuenkel Road), and milepost 20.1 at
Harvey, IL (South Junction), a distance
of approximately 11.5 miles (line).1
The transaction may be consummated
on or after March 28, 2009, the effective
date of the exemption (30 days after the
exemption was filed).
The purpose of the proposed
transaction is to enable WC to handle
efficiently overhead and interchange
freight movements between University
Park and Harvey. Under the trackage
rights agreement, WC shall not perform
any local freight service on the line. WC
does not indicate that the transaction
imposes interchange commitments. See
49 CFR 1180.4(g)(4).
As a condition to this exemption, any
employees affected by the acquisition of
1 A redacted version of the trackage rights
agreement between WC and IC was filed with the
notice of exemption. The full version was
concurrently filed under seal along with a motion
for protective order, which will be addressed in a
separate decision.
E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM
13MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 48 (Friday, March 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10991-10992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5456]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35219]
Union Pacific Railroad Company--Petition for Declaratory Order
AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.
ACTION: Institution of declaratory order proceeding; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In response to a petition filed by Union Pacific Railroad
Company (UP) on February 18, 2009, the Board is instituting a
declaratory order proceeding under 49 U.S.C. 721 and 5 U.S.C.
554(e).\1\ UP requests that the Board determine the extent of the
common carrier obligation to quote rates for new, lengthy movements of
chlorine, a toxic inhalation hazard (TIH), where the transportation
would require movement through High Threat Urban Areas (HTUAs) \2\ and
other large communities to destinations where, according to UP, an
ample supply of chlorine is available from nearby sources. The Board
seeks public comment on this matter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ By a separate decision served on March 10, 2009, the Board
issued a protective order in this proceeding.
\2\ As UP refers to them, HTUAs are defined by the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) at 49 CFR 1580.3.
DATES: Replies to UP's petition and comments are due by March 31, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
UP's rebuttal and reply to comments are due by April 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either via the Board's e-filing
format or in the traditional paper format. Any person using e-filing
should attach a document and otherwise comply with the instructions at
the E-FILING link on the Board's website, at https://www.stb.dot.gov.
Any person submitting a filing in the traditional paper format should
send an original and 10 copies, referring to STB Finance Docket No.
35219, to: Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20423-0001. In addition, send one copy of comments to UP's
representative, Tonya W. Conley, Union Pacific Railroad Company, 1400
Douglas Street, Omaha, NE 68179.
Copies of written comments will be available for viewing and self-
copying at the Board's Public Docket Room, Room 131, and will be posted
to the Board's Web site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Strafford, (202) 245-0356.
[Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at: 1-800-877-8339].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: UP, as a rail common carrier, has an
obligation under 49 U.S.C. 11101(b) to provide common carrier rates and
other service terms upon reasonable request. UP's petition for
declaratory order seeks to address a recent request from a customer for
common carriage rates for the transportation of chlorine from Utah to
destinations in or near Houston and Dallas, TX, and Allemania and
Plaquemine, LA. These movements would average 1,900 miles in distance
and travel through two HTUAs and several other large cities. UP
declined to quote rates for these movements, pending the outcome of
this proceeding, because, according to UP, the risk of potential
exposure from long distance shipments of chlorine is unnecessary where
all four of these destinations are located less than 300 miles from
ample alternate chlorine supplies. UP asserts that the facilities in
both Allemania and Plaquemine have alternate chlorine sources
accessible by rail within 70 miles, none of which will route through
any HTUAs, and that the facilities in Houston and Dallas have
alternative chlorine sources within 300 miles, with potential sources
located in the Houston metropolitan area. UP also asserts that other
governmental agencies have
[[Page 10992]]
requested that it find ways to reduce TIH shipments in order to reduce
TIH transportation risks.
On July 22, 2008, the Board held a public hearing in STB Ex Parte
677 (Sub-No. 1) to examine issues related to the common carrier
obligation of railroads with respect to the transportation of hazardous
materials. Comments were filed in that proceeding by the railroads
(including UP) and TIH shippers. Many of the comments touched on the
issues that are likely to arise in this proceeding. Thus, the parties
that participated in STB Ex Parte 677 (Sub-No. 1) may have an interest
in the issues raised in this proceeding.
Under 5 U.S.C. 554(e), the Board has discretionary authority to
issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove
uncertainty. A declaratory order proceeding is thus instituted in this
proceeding to invite broad public comment. Any person seeking to
comment on UP's petition may submit written comments to the Board
regarding the extent of UP's common carrier obligation to quote rates
for new, lengthy movements of chlorine, where the transportation would
require movement through HTUAs and other large communities to
destinations where an ample supply of chlorine may be available from
nearby sources.
In its petition, UP urges the Board to consult with TSA and the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) because UP suggests that a
decision by the Board in this proceeding could conflict with TSA and
FRA policies. Because the Board's consideration of the issues raised by
UP's petition may relate to statutes and regulations governed by TSA,
FRA, and other agencies, any agency with an interest in the outcome of
these issues is encouraged to comment.
Board decisions, notices, and filings in this and other Board
proceedings are available on our Web site at https://www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: March 10, 2009.
By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-5456 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P