Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis, 10701-10703 [E9-5357]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Proposed Rules
proposed rulemaking notice should be
addressed to Forest Service, USDA, attn:
Director, Minerals and Geology
Management, at Mail Stop 1126,
Washington, DC 20250–1126; by
electronic mail to 36cfr251@fs.fed.us; or
by fax to (703) 605–1575; or by the
electronic process available at Federal
e-Rulemaking portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments,
including names and addresses when
provided, are placed in the record and
are available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received at 1601 N. Kent
Street, Suite 500 Arlington, Virginia
22209 during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.), Monday through
Friday, except holidays. Visitors are
encouraged to call ahead to (703) 605–
4792 to facilitate entry to the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ivette E. Torres, Liaison Specialist,
Minerals and Geology Management.
Phone Number: (703) 605–4792, or (703)
615–7813. E-mail: ietorres@fs.fed.us.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 5, 2009.
Abigail R. Kimball,
Chief, Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E9–5318 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[DA 09–490; MB Docket No. 09–18; RM–
11513]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Dulac,
LA
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Audio Division requests
comment on a petition filed by Sunburst
Media-Louisiana, LLC, licensee of
Station KMYO–FM, Channel 244C3,
Morgan City, Louisiana, proposing the
substitution of FM Channel 230A for
vacant Channel 242A at Dulac,
Louisiana. The reference coordinates for
Channel 230A at Dulac, Louisiana, are
29–20–37 NL and 90–45–16 WL. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, infra.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before April 20, 2009, and reply
comments on or before May 5, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:21 Mar 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 Twelfth Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. In addition to
filing comments with the FCC,
interested parties should serve the
petitioner, his counsel, or consultant, as
follows: Mark N. Lipp, Esq., Scott
Woodworth, Esq., Wiley Rein LLP, 1776
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006
(Counsel for Sunburst Media-Louisiana,
LLC).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew J. Rhodes, Media Bureau, (202)
418–2180.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No.
09–18, adopted February 25, 2009, and
released February 27, 2009. The full text
of this Commission decision is available
for inspection and copying during
regular business hours at the FCC’s
Reference Information Center, Portals II,
445 Twelfth Street, SW., Room CYA257, Washington, DC 20554. The
complete text of this decision may also
be purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554,
telephone 1–800–378–3160 or https://
www.BCPIWEB.com. This document
does not contain proposed information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. In addition,
therefore, it does not contain any
proposed information collection burden
‘‘for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4).
The proposed channel substitution at
Dulac is part of a hybrid application and
rulemaking proceeding. In the
application (File No. BPH–
20090129AMR), Sunburst MediaLouisiana proposes the upgrade of
Channel 244C3 to Channel 244C2 at
Morgan City, Louisiana, the reallotment
of Channel 244C2 to Gray, Louisiana,
and the associated modification of the
Station KMYO–FM license. See 74 FR
9399 (March 4, 2009).
Provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to
this proceeding.
Members of the public should note
that from the time a Notice of Proposed
Rule Making is issued until the matter
is no longer subject to Commission
consideration or court review, all ex
parte contacts are prohibited in
Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments.
See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules
governing permissible ex parte contact.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10701
For information regarding proper
filing procedures for comments, see 47
CFR 1.415 and 1.420.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Radio broadcasting.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 73 as follows:
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
1. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.
§ 73.202
[Amended]
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM
Allotments under Louisiana, is
amended by removing 242A and adding
Channel 230A at Dulac.
Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media
Bureau.
[FR Doc. E9–5398 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R2-ES-2009-0014] [92210-1117-0000B4]
RIN 1018-AT52
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Designation of Critical
Habitat for Roswell springsnail
(Pyrgulopsis roswellensis), Koster’s
springsnail (Juturnia kosteri), Noel’s
amphipod (Gammarus desperatus),
and Pecos assiminea (Assiminea
pecos)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
public comment period.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), take this
action pursuant to a settlement
agreement and court order that vacated,
in part, the August 9. 2005 final rule
that designated critical habitat under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), for the Roswell
springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis),
Koster’s springsnail (Juturnia kosteri),
Noel’s amphipod (Gammarus
desperatus), and Pecos assiminea
(Assiminea pecos) with respect to lands
at the Bitter Lake National Wildlife
E:\FR\FM\12MRP1.SGM
12MRP1
10702
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Refuge. Accordingly, the February 12,
2002, proposed critical habitat
designation is reinstated for these
invertebrates with respect to Bitter Lake
National Wildlife Refuge and we
announce the reopening of the public
comment period for the February 12,
2002, proposed rule in order to
reconsider designation of these lands.
This re-evaluation of the designation of
critical habitat at Bitter Lake National
Wildlife Refuge does not affect the
designation of critical habitat at
Diamond Y Spring and Sandia Spring.
Comments previously submitted on the
February 12, 2002, proposed rule (67 FR
6459) need not be resubmitted as they
have been incorporated into the public
record as part of this reopening of the
comment period and will be fully
considered in preparation of the final
rule. Additionally, so that we may fully
consider any new information available,
we are also soliciting comments and
information on the final economic
analysis and final environmental
assessment that were made available
concurrent with the August 9, 2005,
final designation of critical habitat.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
May 11, 2009. We must receive requests
for public hearings, in writing, at the
address shown in the ADDRESSES section
by April 27, 2009.
You may submit
information by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: FWS-R2ES-2009-0014; Division of Policy and
Directives Management; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We
will post all information received on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see the Public Comments Solicited
section below for more details).
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wally ‘‘J’’ Murphy, Field Supervisor,
New Mexico Ecological Services Field
Office, 2105 Osuna NE, Albuquerque,
NM 87113; telephone 505-761-4781;
facsimile 505-346-2542. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTD), you may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:21 Mar 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
Background
The Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis
roswellensis), Koster’s springsnail
(Juturnia kosteri), Noel’s amphipod
(Gammarus desperatus), and Pecos
assiminea (Assiminea pecos) (four
invertebrates) occupy springs, seeps,
sinkholes, and wetlands near Roswell,
New Mexico, and in Reeves and Pecos
counties, Texas. On February 12, 2002
(67 FR 6459), we published a proposed
rule to list the four invertebrates as
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act;
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and to designate
critical habitat for them. The proposed
rule included two complexes on Bitter
Lake National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge)
totaling 456 hectares (ha) (1127 acres
(ac)), one complex at Diamond Y
Springs in Pecos County, Texas, of 153.8
ha (380 ac), and one complex at East
Sandia Spring in Reeves County, Texas,
of 6.7 ha (16.5 ac). On August 9, 2005,
we published our final rule listing the
four invertebrates as endangered with
critical habitat (70 FR 46304). In that
final rule, critical habitat was
designated at the Diamond Y Spring and
East Sandia Spring complexes but was
not designated on the Refuge on the
ground that these areas did not meet the
definition of ‘‘critical habitat’’ under
section 3(5)(A) of the Act (70 FR 46323).
On December 19, 2007, Forest
Guardians (now WildEarth Guardians)
filed a complaint challenging the merits
of our critical habitat designation for the
four invertebrates, including the
exclusion of the Refuge from the final
critical habitat designation. The
plaintiffs alleged that the Refuge should
have been included in the designation
because it is the last known occupied
habitat for three of the four species
(Roswell springsnail, Koster’s
springsnail, and Noel’s amphipod) and
that the Refuge’s Comprehensive
Conservation Plan would not adequately
protect the species from threats,
including oil and gas development,
outside of the Refuge boundaries.
Pursuant to a settlement agreement, the
court has partially vacated the August 9,
2005, critical habitat decision (70 FR
46304) with respect to the areas
excluded under section 3(5)(A) of the
Act.
If the proposed rule with respect to
the Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge
is made final, section 7 of the Act will
prohibit adverse modification of critical
habitat by any activity funded,
authorized, or carried out by any
Federal agency. Federal agencies
proposing actions that may affect areas
designated as critical habitat must
consult with us on the effects of their
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposed actions, pursuant to section
7(a)(2) of the Act. This re-evaluation of
the designation of critical habitat on the
Refuge does not affect the August 9,
2005, final designation of critical habitat
(70 FR 46304) with respect to
designated critical habitat at Diamond Y
Spring and Sandia Spring, and
consultation on activities that may
result in destruction or adverse
modification of critical habitat is still
required in these areas. Further, section
7(a)(4) of the Act and regulations at 50
CFR 402.10 require Federal agencies to
confer with us on any action that is
likely to result in destruction or adverse
modification of proposed critical
habitat. Thus, Federal agencies are
required to confer with the Service on
any such action that may affect the
proposed critical habitat on the Refuge
as identified in the February 12, 2002,
proposed rule (67 FR 6459).
Section 4 of the Act requires that we
consider economic and other relevant
impacts prior to making a final decision
on what areas to designate as critical
habitat. A final economic analysis and
final environmental assessment were
made available concurrent with the
publication of the August 9, 2005, final
critical habitat designation (70 FR
46304). We solicit data and comments
from the public on the final economic
analysis and final environmental
assessment, as well as on all aspects of
the proposed rule. We will review and
consider all best available information
including public comments or other
information submitted previously or as
part of the present comment period, as
we develop our final determination. In
particular, we may exclude an area from
critical habitat if we determine that the
benefits of excluding the area outweigh
the benefits of including the area as
critical habitat, provided such exclusion
will not result in the extinction of the
species.
Public Comments Solicited
To ensure that the final critical habitat
designation is complete and based on
the best available scientific information,
we are soliciting information from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
industry, or any other interested party
concerning this proposed rule. We
particularly seek information
concerning:
(1) The reasons why habitat on the
Refuge should or should not be
determined to be critical habitat as
provided by section 4 of the Act,
including whether the benefits of
inclusion of these areas will or will not
outweigh the benefits of exclusion from
critical habitat designation;
E:\FR\FM\12MRP1.SGM
12MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
(2) Specific information on the
distribution of the four invertebrates
and their habitats, and which habitats
are essential to the conservation of the
species and why;
(3) Land use management and current
or planned activities in the subject area
and their possible impacts on proposed
critical habitat;
(4) Any foreseeable economic,
environmental, or other impacts
resulting from the proposed designation
of critical habitat;
(5) Whether the economic analysis
makes appropriate assumptions
regarding current practices and likely
regulatory changes imposed as a result
of the designation of critical habitat; and
(6) Whether the economic analysis
appropriately identifies all costs that
could result or have already resulted
from the designation.
Comments previously submitted on
the February 12, 2002, proposed rule (67
FR 6459) need not be resubmitted as
they have been incorporated into the
public record as part of this reopening
of the comment period and will be fully
considered in preparation of the final
rule. Comments submitted during this
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:21 Mar 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
comment period also will be
incorporated into the public record and
will be fully considered in the final rule.
You may submit comments and
materials concerning the proposed rule,
the associated economic analysis, and
the associated environmental
assessment by one of the methods listed
in the ADDRESSES section. We will not
consider comments sent by e-mail or
fax, or to an address not listed in the
ADDRESSES section.
If you submit a comment via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If your submission is
made via a hardcopy that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy comments on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this notice, will be
available for public inspection on https://
www.regulations.gov, or by
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10703
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, New Mexico Ecological
Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may obtain copies of the
proposed rule, the final economic
analysis, and the final environmental
assessment on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by mail from
the New Mexico Ecological Services
Field Office.
Author
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff of the New Mexico Ecological
Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna NE,
Albuquerque, NM 87113.
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Jane Lyder,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Department
of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E9–5357 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-S
E:\FR\FM\12MRP1.SGM
12MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10701-10703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5357]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS-R2-ES-2009-0014] [92210-1117-0000-B4]
RIN 1018-AT52
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of
Critical Habitat for Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis),
Koster's springsnail (Juturnia kosteri), Noel's amphipod (Gammarus
desperatus), and Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of public comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), take this
action pursuant to a settlement agreement and court order that vacated,
in part, the August 9. 2005 final rule that designated critical habitat
under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), for the
Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis), Koster's springsnail
(Juturnia kosteri), Noel's amphipod (Gammarus desperatus), and Pecos
assiminea (Assiminea pecos) with respect to lands at the Bitter Lake
National Wildlife
[[Page 10702]]
Refuge. Accordingly, the February 12, 2002, proposed critical habitat
designation is reinstated for these invertebrates with respect to
Bitter Lake National Wildlife Refuge and we announce the reopening of
the public comment period for the February 12, 2002, proposed rule in
order to reconsider designation of these lands. This re-evaluation of
the designation of critical habitat at Bitter Lake National Wildlife
Refuge does not affect the designation of critical habitat at Diamond Y
Spring and Sandia Spring. Comments previously submitted on the February
12, 2002, proposed rule (67 FR 6459) need not be resubmitted as they
have been incorporated into the public record as part of this reopening
of the comment period and will be fully considered in preparation of
the final rule. Additionally, so that we may fully consider any new
information available, we are also soliciting comments and information
on the final economic analysis and final environmental assessment that
were made available concurrent with the August 9, 2005, final
designation of critical habitat.
DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before May
11, 2009. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at
the address shown in the ADDRESSES section by April 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit information by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public Comments Processing,
Attn: FWS-R2-ES-2009-0014; Division of Policy and Directives
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive,
Suite 222; Arlington, VA 22203.
We will not accept e-mail or faxes. We will post all information
received on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we
will post any personal information you provide us (see the Public
Comments Solicited section below for more details).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wally ``J'' Murphy, Field Supervisor,
New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna NE,
Albuquerque, NM 87113; telephone 505-761-4781; facsimile 505-346-2542.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TTD), you may call
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Roswell springsnail (Pyrgulopsis roswellensis), Koster's
springsnail (Juturnia kosteri), Noel's amphipod (Gammarus desperatus),
and Pecos assiminea (Assiminea pecos) (four invertebrates) occupy
springs, seeps, sinkholes, and wetlands near Roswell, New Mexico, and
in Reeves and Pecos counties, Texas. On February 12, 2002 (67 FR 6459),
we published a proposed rule to list the four invertebrates as
endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act;
16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and to designate critical habitat for them. The
proposed rule included two complexes on Bitter Lake National Wildlife
Refuge (Refuge) totaling 456 hectares (ha) (1127 acres (ac)), one
complex at Diamond Y Springs in Pecos County, Texas, of 153.8 ha (380
ac), and one complex at East Sandia Spring in Reeves County, Texas, of
6.7 ha (16.5 ac). On August 9, 2005, we published our final rule
listing the four invertebrates as endangered with critical habitat (70
FR 46304). In that final rule, critical habitat was designated at the
Diamond Y Spring and East Sandia Spring complexes but was not
designated on the Refuge on the ground that these areas did not meet
the definition of ``critical habitat'' under section 3(5)(A) of the Act
(70 FR 46323).
On December 19, 2007, Forest Guardians (now WildEarth Guardians)
filed a complaint challenging the merits of our critical habitat
designation for the four invertebrates, including the exclusion of the
Refuge from the final critical habitat designation. The plaintiffs
alleged that the Refuge should have been included in the designation
because it is the last known occupied habitat for three of the four
species (Roswell springsnail, Koster's springsnail, and Noel's
amphipod) and that the Refuge's Comprehensive Conservation Plan would
not adequately protect the species from threats, including oil and gas
development, outside of the Refuge boundaries. Pursuant to a settlement
agreement, the court has partially vacated the August 9, 2005, critical
habitat decision (70 FR 46304) with respect to the areas excluded under
section 3(5)(A) of the Act.
If the proposed rule with respect to the Bitter Lake National
Wildlife Refuge is made final, section 7 of the Act will prohibit
adverse modification of critical habitat by any activity funded,
authorized, or carried out by any Federal agency. Federal agencies
proposing actions that may affect areas designated as critical habitat
must consult with us on the effects of their proposed actions, pursuant
to section 7(a)(2) of the Act. This re-evaluation of the designation of
critical habitat on the Refuge does not affect the August 9, 2005,
final designation of critical habitat (70 FR 46304) with respect to
designated critical habitat at Diamond Y Spring and Sandia Spring, and
consultation on activities that may result in destruction or adverse
modification of critical habitat is still required in these areas.
Further, section 7(a)(4) of the Act and regulations at 50 CFR 402.10
require Federal agencies to confer with us on any action that is likely
to result in destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical
habitat. Thus, Federal agencies are required to confer with the Service
on any such action that may affect the proposed critical habitat on the
Refuge as identified in the February 12, 2002, proposed rule (67 FR
6459).
Section 4 of the Act requires that we consider economic and other
relevant impacts prior to making a final decision on what areas to
designate as critical habitat. A final economic analysis and final
environmental assessment were made available concurrent with the
publication of the August 9, 2005, final critical habitat designation
(70 FR 46304). We solicit data and comments from the public on the
final economic analysis and final environmental assessment, as well as
on all aspects of the proposed rule. We will review and consider all
best available information including public comments or other
information submitted previously or as part of the present comment
period, as we develop our final determination. In particular, we may
exclude an area from critical habitat if we determine that the benefits
of excluding the area outweigh the benefits of including the area as
critical habitat, provided such exclusion will not result in the
extinction of the species.
Public Comments Solicited
To ensure that the final critical habitat designation is complete
and based on the best available scientific information, we are
soliciting information from the public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested
party concerning this proposed rule. We particularly seek information
concerning:
(1) The reasons why habitat on the Refuge should or should not be
determined to be critical habitat as provided by section 4 of the Act,
including whether the benefits of inclusion of these areas will or will
not outweigh the benefits of exclusion from critical habitat
designation;
[[Page 10703]]
(2) Specific information on the distribution of the four
invertebrates and their habitats, and which habitats are essential to
the conservation of the species and why;
(3) Land use management and current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts on proposed critical habitat;
(4) Any foreseeable economic, environmental, or other impacts
resulting from the proposed designation of critical habitat;
(5) Whether the economic analysis makes appropriate assumptions
regarding current practices and likely regulatory changes imposed as a
result of the designation of critical habitat; and
(6) Whether the economic analysis appropriately identifies all
costs that could result or have already resulted from the designation.
Comments previously submitted on the February 12, 2002, proposed
rule (67 FR 6459) need not be resubmitted as they have been
incorporated into the public record as part of this reopening of the
comment period and will be fully considered in preparation of the final
rule. Comments submitted during this comment period also will be
incorporated into the public record and will be fully considered in the
final rule.
You may submit comments and materials concerning the proposed rule,
the associated economic analysis, and the associated environmental
assessment by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. We
will not consider comments sent by e-mail or fax, or to an address not
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
If you submit a comment via https://www.regulations.gov, your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--will be
posted on the Web site. If your submission is made via a hardcopy that
includes personal identifying information, you may request at the top
of your document that we withhold this information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will
post all hardcopy comments on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing this notice, will be available for
public inspection on https://www.regulations.gov, or by appointment,
during normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may obtain copies of the proposed rule, the final economic
analysis, and the final environmental assessment on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by mail from the New Mexico Ecological
Services Field Office.
Author
The primary authors of this notice are the staff of the New Mexico
Ecological Services Field Office, 2105 Osuna NE, Albuquerque, NM 87113.
Authority
The authority for this action is the Endangered Species Act of 1973
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Jane Lyder,
Assistant Deputy Secretary for Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E9-5357 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-S