California Municipal Utilities Association; Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA; City and County of San Francisco; Northern California Power Agency; Sacramento Municipal Utility District; Modesto Irrigation District; Transmission Agency of Northern California, Complainants, v. California Independent System Operator Corporation, Respondent; Notice of Complaint, 10728-10729 [E9-5260]
Download as PDF
10728
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Notices
link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the intervention or protest to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St., NE., Washington, DC
20426.
The filings in the above-referenced
proceeding are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list.
They are also available for review in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added
to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or
call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY,
call (202) 502–8659.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–5249 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. ER09–768–000]
assumptions of liability, is March 24,
2009.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the
FERC Online links at https://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic
service, persons with Internet access
who will eFile a document and/or be
listed as a contact for an intervenor
must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the intervention or protest to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St., NE., Washington, DC
20426.
The filings in the above-referenced
proceeding are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an eSubscription link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–5250 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am]
March 4, 2009.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Saracen Power Partners, L.P.;
Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes
Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
This is a supplemental notice in the
above-referenced proceeding of Saracen
Power Partners, L.P.’s application for
market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that
such application includes a request for
blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
Part 34, of future issuances of securities
and assumptions of liability.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest should file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant.
Notice is hereby given that the
deadline for filing protests with regard
to the applicant’s request for blanket
authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of
future issuances of securities and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Mar 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. EL09–38–000]
California Municipal Utilities
Association; Cities of Anaheim, Azusa,
Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and
Riverside, CA; City and County of San
Francisco; Northern California Power
Agency; Sacramento Municipal Utility
District; Modesto Irrigation District;
Transmission Agency of Northern
California, Complainants, v. California
Independent System Operator
Corporation, Respondent; Notice of
Complaint
March 5, 2009.
Take notice that on March 4, 2009, the
California Municipal Utilities
Association, (CMUA) on behalf of itself
and its members, the Cities of Anaheim,
Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Riverside, California (the Six Cities); the
City and County of San Francisco
(CCSF); the Northern California Power
Agency (NCPA); the Sacramento
Municipal Utility District (SMUD); the
Modesto Irrigation District (MID); and
the Transmission Agency of Northern
California (TANC), filed a formal
complaint against the California
Independent System Operator
Corporation (CASIO), pursuant to
sections 206, 306 and 309 of the Federal
Power Act and Rule 206 of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, alleging that
the absence of Tariff provisions to
protect Market Participants against
charges incurred upon implementation
of the Market Redesign and Technology
Upgrade Tariff that are dramatically in
excess of those levied during prior
historic periods is unjust and
unreasonable in violation of the Federal
Power Act.
Complainants certify that copies of
the complaint were served on the
contacts for the CASIO as listed on the
Commission’s list of Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. The Respondent’s answer
and all interventions, or protests must
be filed on or before the comment date.
The Respondent’s answer, motions to
intervene, and protests must be served
on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Notices
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time
on March 16, 2009.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–5260 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP09–22–000]
Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC;
Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the
Proposed Fort Necessity Gas Storage
Project
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
March 4, 2009.
The staff of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) on the
natural gas pipeline facilities proposed
by Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC
(Atmos) in the above-referenced docket.
The EA was prepared to satisfy the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act. The staff
concludes that approval of the proposed
project, with appropriate mitigating
measures, would not constitute a major
federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
The EA assesses the potential
environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the
proposed natural gas storage and
pipeline facilities including:
Storage facilities:
• Three 8.25 billion cubic feet (Bcf)
salt dome storage caverns (24.75 Bcf
total) with a total working capacity of
15.0 Bcf of natural gas, each with a well
and well pad for solution mining and
subsequent gas injection/withdrawal;
• One leaching plant with associated
pumps, tanks, and piping;
• Nine water supply wells;
• Nine brine disposal wells;
• Two collocated 0.9-mile-long, 30inch-diameter gas pipelines from the
compressor station to the three cavern
wells;
• 0.4 mile of 2-inch-diameter diesel
injection pipeline extending from the
leaching plant to the three cavern wells;
• 0.4 mile of 2-inch-diameter
instrument air pipeline extending from
the leaching plant to the three cavern
wells;
• 1.7 miles of varying diameter high
density polyethylene (HDPE) water
supply pipeline extending from the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:56 Mar 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
water supply wells to the leaching
plant;
• 0.4 mile of 20-inch-diameter steel
pipeline feeding high pressure water
extending from the leaching plant to the
three cavern wells;
• 0.4 mile of 22-inch-diameter HDPE
pipeline to return brine from the three
cavern wells to the leaching plant;
• 5.5 miles of varying diameter steel
brine disposal pipeline extending from
the leaching plant to the brine disposal;
• Related delivery piping, line
heaters, pressure vessels, and valves
along with other appurtenant facilities;
and
• One electrical substation consisting
of two 15/20 mega volt ampere
transformers.
Interconnect pipeline facilities:
• One compressor station with nine
4,700 horsepower (hp)-rated natural gas
driven reciprocating compressors,
totaling 42,300 hp;
• One dehydration facility;
• Four meter stations;
• Two collocated 0.01-mile-long (70foot-long), 36-inch-diameter
interconnect gas pipelines with one
metering station to tie in to Tennessee
Gas Pipeline’s (TGP) existing 30-inchdiameter pipeline;
• Two collocated 0.8-mile-long, 36inch-diameter interconnect gas
pipelines with one metering station to
tie into Columbia Gulf Transmission’s
(CGT) existing 30- and 36-inch-diameter
pipelines, continuing northwest from
the proposed TGP metering station site;
• Two collocated 6.5-mile-long 30inch-diameter interconnect gas
pipelines with two metering stations
collocated within the same fenced area
to tie into ANR Pipeline Company’s
(ANR) existing 30- and 36-inch-diameter
pipelines and to the existing 30-inchdiameter Winnsboro Extension of the
Regency Energy Partners’ (Regency)
pipeline, continuing north from the
proposed CGT metering station site; and
• All related facilities.
Atmos states that the project would
provide new storage. It would
interconnect with the existing interstate
pipelines operated by TGP, CGT, and
ANR, and the intrastate pipeline
operated by Regency. All proposed
facilities would be constructed and
operated in Franklin Parish, Louisiana.
Atmos proposes beginning construction
in 2009 and to have Cavern No. 1 in
service by 2011, Cavern No. 2 in service
by 2013, and Cavern No. 3 in service by
2015.
The EA has been placed in the public
files of the FERC. A limited number of
copies of the EA are available for
distribution and public inspection at:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10729
Public Reference Room, 888 First Street,
NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–8371.
Copies of the EA have been mailed to
federal, state, and local agencies; public
interest groups; interested individuals
and affected landowners; Native
American tribes; newspapers and
libraries; and parties to this proceeding.
Any person wishing to comment on
the EA may do so. To ensure
consideration prior to a Commission
decision on the proposal, it is important
that we receive your comments before
the date specified below.
You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Fort
Necessity Gas Storage Project. Your
comments should focus on the potential
environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or
lessen environmental impacts. The more
specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send in your comments
so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before April 3,
2009.
For your convenience, there are three
methods in which you can use to submit
your comments to the Commission. In
all instances please reference the project
docket number CP09–22–000 with your
submission. The docket number can be
found on the front of this notice. The
Commission encourages electronic filing
of comments and has dedicated eFiling
expert staff available to assist you at
202–502–8258 or efiling@ferc.gov.
(1) You may file your comments
electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located on
the Commission’s internet Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov under the link to
Documents and Filings. A Quick
Comment is an easy method for
interested persons to submit text-only
comments on a project;
(2) You may file your comments
electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the
Commission’s internet Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov under the link to
Documents and Filings. eFiling involves
preparing your submission in the same
manner as you would if filing on paper,
and then saving the file on your
computer’s hard drive. You will attach
that file as your submission. New
eFiling users must first create an
account by clicking on ‘‘Sign up’’ or
‘‘eRegister.’’ You will be asked to select
the type of filing you are making. A
comment on a particular project is
considered a ‘‘Comment on a Filing;’’ or
(3) You may file your comments via
mail to the Commission by sending an
E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM
12MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10728-10729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5260]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL09-38-000]
California Municipal Utilities Association; Cities of Anaheim,
Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA; City and County of
San Francisco; Northern California Power Agency; Sacramento Municipal
Utility District; Modesto Irrigation District; Transmission Agency of
Northern California, Complainants, v. California Independent System
Operator Corporation, Respondent; Notice of Complaint
March 5, 2009.
Take notice that on March 4, 2009, the California Municipal
Utilities Association, (CMUA) on behalf of itself and its members, the
Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside,
California (the Six Cities); the City and County of San Francisco
(CCSF); the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA); the Sacramento
Municipal Utility District (SMUD); the Modesto Irrigation District
(MID); and the Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC), filed
a formal complaint against the California Independent System Operator
Corporation (CASIO), pursuant to sections 206, 306 and 309 of the
Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, alleging that the absence
of Tariff provisions to protect Market Participants against charges
incurred upon implementation of the Market Redesign and Technology
Upgrade Tariff that are dramatically in excess of those levied during
prior historic periods is unjust and unreasonable in violation of the
Federal Power Act.
Complainants certify that copies of the complaint were served on
the contacts for the CASIO as listed on the Commission's list of
Corporate Officials.
Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
[[Page 10729]]
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2009.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5260 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P