California Municipal Utilities Association; Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA; City and County of San Francisco; Northern California Power Agency; Sacramento Municipal Utility District; Modesto Irrigation District; Transmission Agency of Northern California, Complainants, v. California Independent System Operator Corporation, Respondent; Notice of Complaint, 10728-10729 [E9-5260]

Download as PDF 10728 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Notices link to log on and submit the intervention or protests. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–5249 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. ER09–768–000] assumptions of liability, is March 24, 2009. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at https:// www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the intervention or protests. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–5250 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am] March 4, 2009. cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES Saracen Power Partners, L.P.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY BILLING CODE 6717–01–P This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of Saracen Power Partners, L.P.’s application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with regard to the applicant’s request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:56 Mar 11, 2009 Jkt 217001 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. EL09–38–000] California Municipal Utilities Association; Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA; City and County of San Francisco; Northern California Power Agency; Sacramento Municipal Utility District; Modesto Irrigation District; Transmission Agency of Northern California, Complainants, v. California Independent System Operator Corporation, Respondent; Notice of Complaint March 5, 2009. Take notice that on March 4, 2009, the California Municipal Utilities Association, (CMUA) on behalf of itself and its members, the Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Riverside, California (the Six Cities); the City and County of San Francisco (CCSF); the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA); the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD); the Modesto Irrigation District (MID); and the Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC), filed a formal complaint against the California Independent System Operator Corporation (CASIO), pursuant to sections 206, 306 and 309 of the Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, alleging that the absence of Tariff provisions to protect Market Participants against charges incurred upon implementation of the Market Redesign and Technology Upgrade Tariff that are dramatically in excess of those levied during prior historic periods is unjust and unreasonable in violation of the Federal Power Act. Complainants certify that copies of the complaint were served on the contacts for the CASIO as listed on the Commission’s list of Corporate Officials. Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent’s answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. The Respondent’s answer, motions to intervene, and protests must be served on the Complainants. The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 47 / Thursday, March 12, 2009 / Notices (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2009. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–5260 Filed 3–11–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP09–22–000] Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC; Notice of Availability of the Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Fort Necessity Gas Storage Project cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES March 4, 2009. The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) on the natural gas pipeline facilities proposed by Atmos Pipeline and Storage, LLC (Atmos) in the above-referenced docket. The EA was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The staff concludes that approval of the proposed project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the construction and operation of the proposed natural gas storage and pipeline facilities including: Storage facilities: • Three 8.25 billion cubic feet (Bcf) salt dome storage caverns (24.75 Bcf total) with a total working capacity of 15.0 Bcf of natural gas, each with a well and well pad for solution mining and subsequent gas injection/withdrawal; • One leaching plant with associated pumps, tanks, and piping; • Nine water supply wells; • Nine brine disposal wells; • Two collocated 0.9-mile-long, 30inch-diameter gas pipelines from the compressor station to the three cavern wells; • 0.4 mile of 2-inch-diameter diesel injection pipeline extending from the leaching plant to the three cavern wells; • 0.4 mile of 2-inch-diameter instrument air pipeline extending from the leaching plant to the three cavern wells; • 1.7 miles of varying diameter high density polyethylene (HDPE) water supply pipeline extending from the VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:56 Mar 11, 2009 Jkt 217001 water supply wells to the leaching plant; • 0.4 mile of 20-inch-diameter steel pipeline feeding high pressure water extending from the leaching plant to the three cavern wells; • 0.4 mile of 22-inch-diameter HDPE pipeline to return brine from the three cavern wells to the leaching plant; • 5.5 miles of varying diameter steel brine disposal pipeline extending from the leaching plant to the brine disposal; • Related delivery piping, line heaters, pressure vessels, and valves along with other appurtenant facilities; and • One electrical substation consisting of two 15/20 mega volt ampere transformers. Interconnect pipeline facilities: • One compressor station with nine 4,700 horsepower (hp)-rated natural gas driven reciprocating compressors, totaling 42,300 hp; • One dehydration facility; • Four meter stations; • Two collocated 0.01-mile-long (70foot-long), 36-inch-diameter interconnect gas pipelines with one metering station to tie in to Tennessee Gas Pipeline’s (TGP) existing 30-inchdiameter pipeline; • Two collocated 0.8-mile-long, 36inch-diameter interconnect gas pipelines with one metering station to tie into Columbia Gulf Transmission’s (CGT) existing 30- and 36-inch-diameter pipelines, continuing northwest from the proposed TGP metering station site; • Two collocated 6.5-mile-long 30inch-diameter interconnect gas pipelines with two metering stations collocated within the same fenced area to tie into ANR Pipeline Company’s (ANR) existing 30- and 36-inch-diameter pipelines and to the existing 30-inchdiameter Winnsboro Extension of the Regency Energy Partners’ (Regency) pipeline, continuing north from the proposed CGT metering station site; and • All related facilities. Atmos states that the project would provide new storage. It would interconnect with the existing interstate pipelines operated by TGP, CGT, and ANR, and the intrastate pipeline operated by Regency. All proposed facilities would be constructed and operated in Franklin Parish, Louisiana. Atmos proposes beginning construction in 2009 and to have Cavern No. 1 in service by 2011, Cavern No. 2 in service by 2013, and Cavern No. 3 in service by 2015. The EA has been placed in the public files of the FERC. A limited number of copies of the EA are available for distribution and public inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10729 Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–8371. Copies of the EA have been mailed to federal, state, and local agencies; public interest groups; interested individuals and affected landowners; Native American tribes; newspapers and libraries; and parties to this proceeding. Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. To ensure consideration prior to a Commission decision on the proposal, it is important that we receive your comments before the date specified below. You can make a difference by providing us with your specific comments or concerns about the Fort Necessity Gas Storage Project. Your comments should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please send in your comments so that they will be received in Washington, DC on or before April 3, 2009. For your convenience, there are three methods in which you can use to submit your comments to the Commission. In all instances please reference the project docket number CP09–22–000 with your submission. The docket number can be found on the front of this notice. The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has dedicated eFiling expert staff available to assist you at 202–502–8258 or efiling@ferc.gov. (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick Comment feature, which is located on the Commission’s internet Web site at https://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. A Quick Comment is an easy method for interested persons to submit text-only comments on a project; (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling feature, which is located on the Commission’s internet Web site at https://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. eFiling involves preparing your submission in the same manner as you would if filing on paper, and then saving the file on your computer’s hard drive. You will attach that file as your submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on ‘‘Sign up’’ or ‘‘eRegister.’’ You will be asked to select the type of filing you are making. A comment on a particular project is considered a ‘‘Comment on a Filing;’’ or (3) You may file your comments via mail to the Commission by sending an E:\FR\FM\12MRN1.SGM 12MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 47 (Thursday, March 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10728-10729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-38-000]


California Municipal Utilities Association; Cities of Anaheim, 
Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, CA; City and County of 
San Francisco; Northern California Power Agency; Sacramento Municipal 
Utility District; Modesto Irrigation District; Transmission Agency of 
Northern California, Complainants, v. California Independent System 
Operator Corporation, Respondent; Notice of Complaint

March 5, 2009.
    Take notice that on March 4, 2009, the California Municipal 
Utilities Association, (CMUA) on behalf of itself and its members, the 
Cities of Anaheim, Azusa, Banning, Colton, Pasadena, and Riverside, 
California (the Six Cities); the City and County of San Francisco 
(CCSF); the Northern California Power Agency (NCPA); the Sacramento 
Municipal Utility District (SMUD); the Modesto Irrigation District 
(MID); and the Transmission Agency of Northern California (TANC), filed 
a formal complaint against the California Independent System Operator 
Corporation (CASIO), pursuant to sections 206, 306 and 309 of the 
Federal Power Act and Rule 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, alleging that the absence 
of Tariff provisions to protect Market Participants against charges 
incurred upon implementation of the Market Redesign and Technology 
Upgrade Tariff that are dramatically in excess of those levied during 
prior historic periods is unjust and unreasonable in violation of the 
Federal Power Act.
    Complainants certify that copies of the complaint were served on 
the contacts for the CASIO as listed on the Commission's list of 
Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's 
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before 
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and 
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at https://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at https://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call

[[Page 10729]]

(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 16, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-5260 Filed 3-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.