Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; CERENIA TABLETS, 10597-10598 [E9-5109]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 11, 2009 / Notices
Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For animal drug
products, the testing phase begins on
the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated
for the drug or when an exemption
under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
360b(j)) became effective and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval
phase starts with the initial submission
of an application to market the animal
drug product and continues until FDA
grants permission to market the drug
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
an animal drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the animal drug product CERENIA
INJECTABLE SOLUTION (maropitant).
CERENIA INJECTABLE SOLUTION is
indicated for the prevention and
treatment of acute vomiting in dogs.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for
CERENIA INJECTABLE SOLUTION
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:01 Mar 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
(U.S. Patent No. 6,222,038) from Pfizer
Inc., and the Patent and Trademark
Office requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
May 6, 2008, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this animal
drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of CERENIA INJECTABLE
SOLUTION represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Shortly thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
CERENIA INJECTABLE SOLUTION is
1,887 days. Of this time, 1,841 days
occurred during the testing phase of the
regulatory review period, while 46 days
occurred during the approval phase.
These periods of time were derived from
the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j))
became effective: December 1, 2001. The
applicant claims June 28, 2000, as the
date the investigational new animal
drug application (INAD) became
effective. However, the date that a major
health or environmental effects test is
begun or the date on which the agency
acknowledges the filing of a notice of
claimed investigational exemption for a
new animal drug, whichever is earlier,
is the effective date for the INAD.
According to FDA records, December 1,
2001, is the effective date for the INAD.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section 512
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act: December 15, 2006. The applicant
claims December 13, 2006, as the date
the new animal drug application
(NADA) for CERENIA INJECTABLE
SOLUTION (NADA 141–263) was
initially submitted. However, a review
of FDA records reveals that NADA 141–
263 was initially submitted on
December 15, 2006.
3. The date the application was
approved: January 29, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 141–263 was approved on
January 29, 2007.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,078 days of patent
term extension.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10597
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by May 11, 2009.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
September 8, 2009. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: February 17, 2009.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E9–5112 Filed 3–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–E–0230]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CERENIA TABLETS
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
CERENIA TABLETS and is publishing
this notice of that determination as
required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
10598
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 11, 2009 / Notices
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993–
0002, 301–796–3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For animal drug
products, the testing phase begins on
the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated
for the drug or when an exemption
under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
360b(j)) became effective and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval
phase starts with the initial submission
of an application to market the animal
drug product and continues until FDA
grants permission to market the drug
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
an animal drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the animal drug product CERENIA
TABLETS (maropitant citrate
monohydrate). CERENIA TABLETS is
indicated for the prevention of acute
vomiting in dogs and the prevention of
vomiting due to motion sickness in
dogs. Subsequent to this approval, the
Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for
CERENIA TABLETS (U.S. Patent No.
6,255,320) from Pfizer Inc., and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
FDA’s assistance in determining this
patent’s eligibility for patent term
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:01 Mar 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
restoration. In a letter dated May 6,
2008, FDA advised the Patent and
Trademark Office that this animal drug
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
CERENIA TABLETS represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Shortly thereafter,
the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
CERENIA TABLETS is 1,887 days. Of
this time, 1,841 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory
review period, while 46 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j))
became effective: December 1, 2001. The
applicant claims November 21, 2000, as
the date the investigational new animal
drug application (INAD) became
effective. However, the date that a major
health or environmental effects test is
begun or the date on which the agency
acknowledges the filing of a notice of
claimed investigational exemption for a
new animal drug, whichever is earlier,
is the effective date for the INAD.
According to FDA records, December 1,
2001, is the effective date for the INAD.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section 512
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act: December 15, 2006. The applicant
claims December 13, 2006, as the date
the new animal drug application
(NADA) for CERENIA TABLETS (NADA
141–262) was initially submitted.
However, a review of FDA records
reveals that NADA 141–262 was
initially submitted on December 15,
2006.
3. The date the application was
approved: January 29, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 141–262 was approved on
January 29, 2007.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 267 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
redetermination by May 11, 2009.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
September 8, 2009. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: February 17, 2009.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E9–5109 Filed 3–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–D–0060]
Guidance for Industry: Measures to
Address the Risk for Contamination by
Salmonella Species in Food
Containing a Peanut-Derived Product
as an Ingredient; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled
‘‘Guidance for Industry: Measures to
Address the Risk for Contamination by
Salmonella Species in Food Containing
a Peanut-Derived Product as an
Ingredient.’’ This guidance is intended
to clarify for manufacturers who
produce foods containing a peanutderived product as an ingredient that
there is a risk that Salmonella species
may be present in the incoming peanutderived product, and to recommend
measures to address that risk.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on agency guidances at any
time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the guidance to the Division of
E:\FR\FM\11MRN1.SGM
11MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10597-10598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-5109]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2007-E-0230]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CERENIA TABLETS
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for CERENIA TABLETS and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
[[Page 10598]]
electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of
Regulatory Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6222, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For animal drug products, the
testing phase begins on the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated for the drug or when an
exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and runs until the approval
phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of
an application to market the animal drug product and continues until
FDA grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual
amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may
award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well
as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for an animal
drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the animal drug product CERENIA
TABLETS (maropitant citrate monohydrate). CERENIA TABLETS is indicated
for the prevention of acute vomiting in dogs and the prevention of
vomiting due to motion sickness in dogs. Subsequent to this approval,
the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration
application for CERENIA TABLETS (U.S. Patent No. 6,255,320) from Pfizer
Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in
determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated May 6, 2008, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office
that this animal drug product had undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of CERENIA TABLETS represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly
thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA
determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
CERENIA TABLETS is 1,887 days. Of this time, 1,841 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 46 days
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived
from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective: December
1, 2001. The applicant claims November 21, 2000, as the date the
investigational new animal drug application (INAD) became effective.
However, the date that a major health or environmental effects test is
begun or the date on which the agency acknowledges the filing of a
notice of claimed investigational exemption for a new animal drug,
whichever is earlier, is the effective date for the INAD. According to
FDA records, December 1, 2001, is the effective date for the INAD.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the animal drug product under section 512 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act: December 15, 2006. The applicant claims December 13,
2006, as the date the new animal drug application (NADA) for CERENIA
TABLETS (NADA 141-262) was initially submitted. However, a review of
FDA records reveals that NADA 141-262 was initially submitted on
December 15, 2006.
3. The date the application was approved: January 29, 2007. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NADA 141-262 was approved on
January 29, 2007.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 267 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by May 11, 2009. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by September 8,
2009. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: February 17, 2009.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E9-5109 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S