Safety Zone; Coast Guard Air Station San Francisco Airborne Use of Force Judgmental Training Flights, 9956-9958 [E9-4894]
Download as PDF
9956
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
designated herein for the 2008–09 crop
year apply to all NS raisins acquired
during the crop year; (2) handlers are
aware of this action, which was
unanimously recommended at a public
meeting, and need no additional time to
comply with these percentages; and (3)
this interim final rule provides a 60-day
comment period, and all comments
timely received will be considered prior
to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 989 is amended to
read as followed:
PART 989—RAISINS PRODUCED
FROM GRAPES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 989 continues to read as follows:
■
Crop year
2003–04
2005–06
2006–07
2007–08
2008–09
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
......................................................................
Dated: March 3, 2009.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–4851 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0063]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Coast Guard Air Station
San Francisco Airborne Use of Force
Judgmental Training Flights
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters of the San Pablo
Bay, CA for training purposes. This
safety zone is established to ensure the
safety of the public and participating
crews from potential hazards associated
with fast-moving Coast Guard
smallboats taking part in the exercise.
Unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or remaining in the safety zone
without permission of the Captain of the
Port San Francisco or his designated
representative.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:42 Mar 06, 2009
2. Section 989.257 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 989.257 Final free and reserve
percentages.
(a) The final percentages for the
respective varietal type(s) of raisins
acquired by handlers during the crop
year beginning August 1, which shall be
free tonnage and reserve tonnage,
respectively, are designated as follows:
Free
percentage
Varietal type
(b) The volume regulation percentages
apply to acquisitions of the varietal type
of raisins for the applicable crop year
until the reserve raisins for that crop are
disposed of under the marketing order.
ACTION:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Jkt 217001
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
(sun-dried)
(sun-dried)
(sun-dried)
(sun-dried)
(sun-dried)
Seedless
Seedless
Seedless
Seedless
Seedless
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
DATES: This safety zone is effective from
9 a.m. on February 10, 2009, until 10
p.m. on March 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket USCG–2009–0063 and are
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG–
2009–0063 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco, 1 Yerba
Buena Island, San Francisco, California
94130, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade
Megan Clifford, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
San Francisco, at (415) 399–7436. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
Due to the dynamic availability of
Coast Guard assets to conduct this
training, the Coast Guard is issuing this
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70
82.50
90
85
87
Reserve
percentage
30
17.50
10
15
13
final rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section (a)(1) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553). This provision creates a
military function exception to the
advance publication requirements.
Because of the potential hazards posed
by this exercise, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
public, participating vessels and crews,
and other vessels transiting the area. For
the safety concerns noted, it is in the
public interest to have these regulations
in effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because any delay in the effective
date of this rule would expose mariners
to the potential hazards posed by the
exercises. For the same reasons as
above, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register.
Background and Purpose
U.S. Coast Guard Air Station San
Francisco will be conducting airborne
use of force judgmental training flights
with observers from the Coast Guard
Aviation Training Center and Coast
Guard Headquarters, on February 10,
and March 5 through 20, 2009
(excluding Saturdays and Sundays), in
the waters of San Pablo Bay. The
exercises are designed to train and test
Coast Guard aviation personnel in the
judgmental decision-making process
necessary to safely and effectively
employ use of force from a helicopter
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
during homeland security incidents.
The training will generally involve the
use of Coast Guard helicopters to
intercept fast-moving, evasive
smallboats on the water. The helicopter
crews will fire weapons at the
smallboats using blank ammunition and
catch bags to ensure that cartridges and
other debris do not fall to the water.
This safety zone is issued to establish a
temporary restricted area in San Pablo
Bay around the training site.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone in the navigable
waters of San Pablo Bay. During the
exercises the safety zone applies to the
navigable waters, from the surface to the
seafloor, defined by enclosing an area
between the following points: 38°05′11″
N, 122°22′10″ W; 38°03′44″ N,
122°20′12″ W; 38°00′41″ N, 122°25′28″
W; and 38°01′45″ N, 122°26′38″ W (NAD
83).
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the exercise.
Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the restricted area.
These regulations are intended to keep
the public a safe distance away from the
participating smallboats and to ensure
the safety of transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters encompassed by the safety
zone, the effect of the rule will not be
significant because the safety zone is in
an area of San Pablo Bay not heavily
used by commercial traffic and because
local waterway users will be notified via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
minimum impact. The entities most
likely to be affected are pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:42 Mar 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for several
reasons: (i) Vessel traffic can pass safely
around the area, (ii) vessels engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing
have ample space outside of the effected
portion of the San Pablo Bay to engage
in these activities, (iii) this rule will
encompass only a small portion of the
waterway for limited periods of time,
and (iv) the maritime public will be
advised in advance of and during the
enforcement of this safety zone via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
9957
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Collection of Information
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
9958
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
■
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
■
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded under the Instruction
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation because this temporary
rule establishes a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:42 Mar 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Dated: February 9, 2009.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E9–4894 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165–T11–149 to
read as follows:
§ 165–T11–149 Safety Zone; Coast Guard
Air Station San Francisco Airborne Use of
Force Judgmental Training Flights.
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone is established for the navigable
waters of the San Pablo Bay, from the
surface to the seafloor, defined by
enclosing an area between the following
points: 38°05′11″ N, 122°22′10″ W;
38°03′44″ N, 122°20′12″ W; 38°00′41″ N,
122°25′28″ W; and 38°01′45″ N,
122°26′38″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘Designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel or a
Federal, State, or local officer assisting
the Captain of the Port (COTP) San
Francisco in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this title, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the safety zone by contacting the Patrol
Commander on VHF–16 or through the
Coast Guard Command Center at
telephone (415) 399–3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This
temporary rule will be enforced from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. on February 10, 2009, and
from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. on March 5–6,
9–13, and 16–20, 2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 60
[R08–WY–2008–0001; FRL–8770–2]
New Source Performance Standards;
Supplemental Delegation of Authority
to the State of Wyoming
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Delegation of authority;
technical amendment.
SUMMARY: The Wyoming Department of
Environmental Quality submitted a
request for an updated delegation of
authority to implement and enforce the
Federal New Source Performance
Standards, including one new standard
not previously delegated. EPA’s review
of Wyoming’s updated regulations
determined that they contain adequate
and effective procedures for the
implementation and enforcement of
these Federal standards. This action
informs the public of the updated
delegation to Wyoming.
EPA is also making a technical
amendment to update the list of
subparts delegated to Wyoming.
DATES: This technical amendment is
effective on March 9, 2009. The
delegation of authority to Wyoming
became effective on November 26, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Copies of documents
relevant to this action are available for
public inspection at the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, Air
Program, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,
Colorado 80202–1129. EPA requests that
if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the materials. You may
view the hard copy of the materials
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Platt, EPA Region 8, at (303) 312–
6449, or Platt.Amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For the
purpose of this document, we are giving
meaning to certain words or initials as
follows:
(i) The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
E:\FR\FM\09MRR1.SGM
09MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9956-9958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4894]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0063]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Coast Guard Air Station San Francisco Airborne Use
of Force Judgmental Training Flights
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of the San Pablo Bay, CA for training purposes. This
safety zone is established to ensure the safety of the public and
participating crews from potential hazards associated with fast-moving
Coast Guard smallboats taking part in the exercise. Unauthorized
persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or remaining in the safety zone without permission of the
Captain of the Port San Francisco or his designated representative.
DATES: This safety zone is effective from 9 a.m. on February 10, 2009,
until 10 p.m. on March 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2009-0063 and are available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0063 in the Docket ID
box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID
column. This material is also available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and Coast Guard Sector
San Francisco, 1 Yerba Buena Island, San Francisco, California 94130,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade Megan Clifford, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415) 399-7436. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
Due to the dynamic availability of Coast Guard assets to conduct
this training, the Coast Guard is issuing this final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
(a)(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553). This
provision creates a military function exception to the advance
publication requirements. Because of the potential hazards posed by
this exercise, the safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety
of the public, participating vessels and crews, and other vessels
transiting the area. For the safety concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have these regulations in effect during the event.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with
respect to this rule because any delay in the effective date of this
rule would expose mariners to the potential hazards posed by the
exercises. For the same reasons as above, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
U.S. Coast Guard Air Station San Francisco will be conducting
airborne use of force judgmental training flights with observers from
the Coast Guard Aviation Training Center and Coast Guard Headquarters,
on February 10, and March 5 through 20, 2009 (excluding Saturdays and
Sundays), in the waters of San Pablo Bay. The exercises are designed to
train and test Coast Guard aviation personnel in the judgmental
decision-making process necessary to safely and effectively employ use
of force from a helicopter
[[Page 9957]]
during homeland security incidents. The training will generally involve
the use of Coast Guard helicopters to intercept fast-moving, evasive
smallboats on the water. The helicopter crews will fire weapons at the
smallboats using blank ammunition and catch bags to ensure that
cartridges and other debris do not fall to the water. This safety zone
is issued to establish a temporary restricted area in San Pablo Bay
around the training site.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of San Pablo Bay. During the exercises the safety zone
applies to the navigable waters, from the surface to the seafloor,
defined by enclosing an area between the following points:
38[deg]05'11'' N, 122[deg]22'10'' W; 38[deg]03'44'' N, 122[deg]20'12''
W; 38[deg]00'41'' N, 122[deg]25'28'' W; and 38[deg]01'45'' N,
122[deg]26'38'' W (NAD 83).
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the exercise.
Except for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted
area. These regulations are intended to keep the public a safe distance
away from the participating smallboats and to ensure the safety of
transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of the rule will not be significant because
the safety zone is in an area of San Pablo Bay not heavily used by
commercial traffic and because local waterway users will be notified
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure minimum impact. The entities
most likely to be affected are pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect owners and operators of pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities and sightseeing. This rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for several reasons: (i) Vessel traffic can pass safely around the
area, (ii) vessels engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing
have ample space outside of the effected portion of the San Pablo Bay
to engage in these activities, (iii) this rule will encompass only a
small portion of the waterway for limited periods of time, and (iv) the
maritime public will be advised in advance of and during the
enforcement of this safety zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
[[Page 9958]]
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ``significant energy action'' under that
order because it is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator
of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated
it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because this temporary rule establishes a
safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165-T11-149 to read as follows:
Sec. 165-T11-149 Safety Zone; Coast Guard Air Station San Francisco
Airborne Use of Force Judgmental Training Flights.
(a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established for the
navigable waters of the San Pablo Bay, from the surface to the
seafloor, defined by enclosing an area between the following points:
38[deg]05'11'' N, 122[deg]22'10'' W; 38[deg]03'44'' N, 122[deg]20'12''
W; 38[deg]00'41'' N, 122[deg]25'28'' W; and 38[deg]01'45'' N,
122[deg]26'38'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``Designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer assisting the
Captain of the Port (COTP) San Francisco in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec. 165.23
of this title, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter the safety zone by contacting
the Patrol Commander on VHF-16 or through the Coast Guard Command
Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
(d) Enforcement period. This temporary rule will be enforced from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. on February 10, 2009, and from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. on
March 5-6, 9-13, and 16-20, 2009.
Dated: February 9, 2009.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E9-4894 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P