Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy Ranger District, Pomeroy, WA; South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project, 9981-9983 [E9-4764]
Download as PDF
9981
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Notices
REPORTING BURDEN
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Estimated average number
of hours per
response
Estimated total
annual hours
of response
burden
SFA Directors
SFA Director Survey
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
600
150
1.00
1.00
600
150
0.4175
0.0500
250.500
7.500
300
75
1.00
1.00
300
75
0.3006
0.0500
90.180
3.750
600
150
1.00
1.00
900
225
0.3785
0.0500
340.680
11.250
900
47
1.00
1.00
900
47
0.3340
0.0500
300.600
2.350
900
47
1.00
1.00
900
47
6.1002
0.0500
5,490.180
2.350
900
47
1.00
1.00
1,800
94
3.2171
0.0500
5,790.780
4.700
1.00
1.00
855
92
0.3340
0.0500
285.570
4.600
SFA Recruitment Interview
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
Total for SFA Directors
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
School Foodservice Managers
School Food Service Manager Survey
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
Menu Survey
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
Total for School Food Service Managers
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
Principals
Completed interviews ...........................................................
Attempted interviews ............................................................
855
92
School Liaisons
Completed checklists ...........................................................
Attempted checklists ............................................................
855
92
1.00
1.00
855
92
0.5000
0.0500
427.500
4.600
Total Responding Burden .............................................
3,591
1.37
4,913
1.3983
6,869.680
Estimated Time per Response: 1.3983
hours. As shown in the above table, the
estimated time of response varies from
20 minutes (0.3340 hours) to 6.1002
hours for responders and 5 minutes for
non-responders, depending on the
respondent group and instrument.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Dated: March 3, 2009.
E. Enrique Gomez,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–4838 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Mar 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy
Ranger District, Pomeroy, WA; South
George Vegetation and Fuels
Management Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose
environmental effects on proposed
resource management actions in South
George project planning area. This
project would improve the health and
vigor of upland forest stands by
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
managing vegetation composition,
structure, stand density, and diversity,
and decrease the susceptibility to future
wildland fires of uncharacteristic
intensity by reducing ladder, surface,
and canopy fuels. The project planning
area is approximately 21,000 acres in
size. Proposed project activities consist
of commercial timber harvest, including
treatment of activity and natural fuels
within harvest units, non commercial
thinning for fuels reduction purposes,
temporary road construction (that will
be decommissioned after project use),
danger tree removal along haul routes,
and landscape prescribed burning.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
April 8, 2009. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected September
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
9982
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Notices
2009 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected December
2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Monte Fujishin, District Ranger,
Pomeroy Ranger District, 71 West Main
Street, Pomeroy, WA 99347. Comments
may also be sent via e-mail to
comments-pacificnorthwest-umatillapomeroy@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to
(509) 843–4621. Comments may be hand
delivered to the Pomeroy Ranger District
office between the hours of 7:30 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a manner that they are useful to
the agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
comments. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the
respondent with standing to participate
in subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed
Koberstein, Project Team Leader,
Pomeroy Ranger District, telephone
(509) 843–1891 or e-mail
ekoberstein@fs.fed.us. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: South
George project planning area is
primarily located in Asotin County,
Washington with a small portion in
Garfield County, Washington. The legal
description of the area is as follows:
portions of T.7N., R.44E., section 1;
T.7N., R.43E., sections 1–2; T.8N.,
R.43E., sections 1, 2, 10–15, 21–28, 3336; T.8N., R.44E., sections 5–8, 17–20,
26–36; and T. 9N., R.43E., section 35. It
is within South Fork Asotin Creek and
Upper George Creek Subwatersheds of
Asotin Watershed. Asotin Creek and
Wenatchee Creek inventoried roadless
areas (IRAs) are adjacent on the west
and south sides of the project planning
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Mar 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
area. Existing forest roads (4400, 4300,
and 4304) separate the IRAs from the
project planning area boundary.
Anatone Wildland Urban Interface
(WUI) area is near the eastern boundary
of the project planning area and is
identified in the Asotin County
Community Wildfire Protection Plan
(CWPP). Approximately 550 acres
within the project planning area is
owned by Washington State Department
of Fish and Wildlife.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for action in
this project is to improve health, vigor,
and resilience to fire, insects, and
disease in upland forests that are
outside their historical 3 pre-fire
suppression conditions for species
composition, structural diversity,
stocking densities, and fuel loads.
Additionally there is a need to provide
sawlogs and wood fiber products for
utilization by regional and local
industry.
Findings from historical range of
variability analysis show that dry
upland forest sites once dominated by
old forest stands of ponderosa pine have
closed in with shade tolerant species
such as Douglas-fir and grand fir.
Species composition on dry-forest sites
indicates that Douglas-fir and grand fir
are over-represented, and ponderosa
pine is under-represented. For moist
forest sites, species composition
analysis shows that Douglas-fir, western
larch, and lodgepole pine are underrepresented and below their historical
range, while grand fir and spruce-fir are
over-represented. Findings also show
that existing insect and disease
susceptibility based upon historical
range of variability is well above normal
levels for defoliators (western spruce
budworm and Douglas-fir tussock
moth), fir engraver beetles, and root
diseases (Armillaria and laminated root
disease). The following statements
summarize the purpose of and need for
action in South George project planning
area:
Vegetation—There is a need to
manage vegetation composition,
structure, stand density, and diversity of
landscape patterns toward desired
future conditions across the landscape
by favoring fire tolerant species,
increasing old forest structure, and
reducing stocking density to levels that
resist insects, diseases, and standreplacing wildfire(s).
Fuels—There is a need to improve
suppression capability near private
lands, and treat forest stands that
deviate from natural fire regimes in
terms of fire return interval and
vegetative change from historical
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
composition and density, specifically in
condition class 2 (moderately altered
from historical range) and condition
class 3 (significantly altered from
historical range). This would decrease
the potential risk to wildfires of
uncharacteristic intensity by reducing
fuel loads to levels expected under
natural fire disturbance regimes. This
would be achieved by lowering stand
densities, increasing the relative
abundance of fire tolerant species,
reducing existing ladder, surface, and
canopy fuels, and reintroducing
landscape prescribed fire into the
ecosystem.
Timber Production—There is a need
to provide sawlogs and wood fiber for
utilization by regional and local
economies.
Proposed Action—Following are brief
descriptions of activities proposed for
implementation, along with associated
activities that would occur
concurrently.
Timber Harvest—Commercially
harvest approximately 4,200 acres. Free
thinning (an unevenaged prescription
utilized when remaining structure and
composition is paramount and suited
for restoring old-growth character of
forests as well as reducing risk of
wildfire) would be the primary
silviculture prescription (approximately
3,300 acres). Some shelterwood and
seed-tree prescriptions (approximately
900 acres) would be used in declining
stands where thinning would not restore
stand health or vigor. Treatments would
tend to favor early seral tree species
such as ponderosa pine and western
larch. Harvest methods would include
conventional ground based tractor
logging (approximately 3,000 acres),
skyline logging (approximately 900
acres) and helicopter logging
(approximately 300 acres). Some
treatment units may include the
removal of sawlogs, small diameter trees
(generally less than 7.0 inches diameter
at breast height), and excess down wood
for use as woody biomass products.
Harvest objectives would vary by stand
condition and fuel management
objectives. The focus of treatment would
be based on the desired quality of each
treatment area after management rather
than the quantity of products removed
from each area.
Fuel Treatments (activity and
natural)—Treat to convert stands in
condition classes 2 and 3 to condition
class 1 (within historical range).
Treatments would be designed to reduce
ladder fuels to lower the risk of fire
spread into the upper canopy, and
reduce ground fuel that could contribute
to uncharacteristic wildfire intensity
and resource damage. Treatments would
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Notices
also reduce fuel continuity in areas
adjacent to private lands. Treatment
objectives would be achieved though a
combination of the following activities
(more than one treatment may occur on
a single acre): mechanical thinning
(approximately 1,300 acres), prescribed
burning of activity fuels (approximately
2,100 acres), grapple piling of activity
fuels (approximately 1,000 acres) and
yarding with tops attached. Noncommercial thinning by hand or
mechanical methods would remove
trees that are less than 10 inches
diameter at breast height in stands with
excess ladder fuels (approximately 200
acres).
Road Management—To accomplish
implementation of proposed activities
approximately 32 miles of closed system
roads and 45 miles of seasonally open
roads would be used as haul routes. All
system roads would remain the same
after project implementation, closed
roads would continue to be closed and
seasonally open roads would continue
with that designation. Approximately
3.0 miles of temporary road would be
constructed, of which 1.4 miles would
be constructed over previous road
templates. All temporary roads would
be decommissioned after project activity
use. No new road construction is
proposed.
Danger Tree Removal—Danger trees
would be felled and removed along all
previously described haul routes used
for timber sale activity. If considered
economically feasible, they would be
sold as part of a timber sale. Danger
trees within Riparian Habitat
Conservation Areas (RHCAs) would not
be removed; they would be cut and left
to provide additional coarse woody
debris.
Landscape Prescribed Fire—
Landscape prescribed fire would occur
across approximately 3,000 acres within
the project planning area. This
treatment would reintroduce fire to a
fire-dependent ecosystem to lessen the
effects of a future uncharacteristic large
wildfire and improve forage quality for
big game. In the project planning area,
fire intensities would be kept low by
keeping fire out of the overstory and
burning mainly surface fuels. Individual
tree and group torching would likely
occur in areas where there is sufficient
ladder fuels and in timber stands with
high occurrences of mistletoe. Upon
completion the area would likely be a
mosaic of unburned, lightly burned,
moderately burned, and intensely
burned patches.
Responsible Official
Monte Fujishin, District Ranger,
Pomeroy Ranger District, Umatilla
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:28 Mar 06, 2009
Jkt 217001
National Forest, 71 West Main Street,
Pomeroy, Washington 99347.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to
approve the proposed action or any
alternative way to achieve the desired
outcome. No Forest Plan amendment is
proposed.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments and input
regarding this proposed action are being
requested from the public and other
interested parties in conjunction with
this notice of intent. The comment
period will be open for thirty days,
beginning on the date of publication of
this notice of intent. Response to the
draft environmental impact statement
will be sought from interested tribes and
public beginning approximately in
September 2009.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a manner that they are useful to
the agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
comments. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
Dated: March 2, 2009.
Monte Fujishin,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9–4764 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee Meeting
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000, as amended,
(Pub. L. 110–343), the Boise and Payette
National Forests’ Southwest Idaho
Resource Advisory Committee will
conduct a business meeting. The
meeting is open to the public.
DATES: Thursday, March 19, beginning
at 10:30 a.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9983
ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk
Management Program Building, 3100
South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda
topics will include review and approval
of project proposals, and is an open
public forum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Brandel, Designated Federal
Official, at (208) 347–0301 or e-mail
kbrandel@fs.fed.us.
Dated: February 27, 2009.
Suzanne C. Rainville,
Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–4765 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–331–802
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Ecuador: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp from Ecuador
with respect to 81 companies. The
respondents which the Department
selected for individual examination are
Promarisco, S.A. (Promarisco) and
Sociedad Nacional de Galapagos, S.A.
(Songa). The respondents which were
not selected for individual examination
are listed in the ‘‘Preliminary Results of
Review’’ section of this notice. This is
the third administrative review of this
order. The period of review (POR)
covers February 1, 2007, through August
14, 2007.
We preliminarily determine that sales
made to the United States by Promarisco
and Songa have been made below
normal value (NV). In addition, based
on the preliminary results for the
respondents selected for individual
examination, we have determined a
preliminary weighted–average margin
for those companies that were not
individually examined.
If the preliminary results are adopted
in our final results of administrative
review, we will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. Interested parties are invited to
comment on the preliminary results.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 9, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM
09MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9981-9983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy Ranger District, Pomeroy, WA;
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose environmental effects on proposed resource
management actions in South George project planning area. This project
would improve the health and vigor of upland forest stands by managing
vegetation composition, structure, stand density, and diversity, and
decrease the susceptibility to future wildland fires of
uncharacteristic intensity by reducing ladder, surface, and canopy
fuels. The project planning area is approximately 21,000 acres in size.
Proposed project activities consist of commercial timber harvest,
including treatment of activity and natural fuels within harvest units,
non commercial thinning for fuels reduction purposes, temporary road
construction (that will be decommissioned after project use), danger
tree removal along haul routes, and landscape prescribed burning.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by April 8, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
September
[[Page 9982]]
2009 and the final environmental impact statement is expected December
2009.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Monte Fujishin, District Ranger,
Pomeroy Ranger District, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, WA 99347.
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to comments-pacificnorthwest-
umatilla-pomeroy@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to (509) 843-4621. Comments
may be hand delivered to the Pomeroy Ranger District office between the
hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation
of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and comments. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide
the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent
administrative appeal or judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Koberstein, Project Team Leader,
Pomeroy Ranger District, telephone (509) 843-1891 or e-mail
ekoberstein@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: South George project planning area is
primarily located in Asotin County, Washington with a small portion in
Garfield County, Washington. The legal description of the area is as
follows: portions of T.7N., R.44E., section 1; T.7N., R.43E., sections
1-2; T.8N., R.43E., sections 1, 2, 10-15, 21-28, 33-36; T.8N., R.44E.,
sections 5-8, 17-20, 26-36; and T. 9N., R.43E., section 35. It is
within South Fork Asotin Creek and Upper George Creek Subwatersheds of
Asotin Watershed. Asotin Creek and Wenatchee Creek inventoried roadless
areas (IRAs) are adjacent on the west and south sides of the project
planning area. Existing forest roads (4400, 4300, and 4304) separate
the IRAs from the project planning area boundary. Anatone Wildland
Urban Interface (WUI) area is near the eastern boundary of the project
planning area and is identified in the Asotin County Community Wildfire
Protection Plan (CWPP). Approximately 550 acres within the project
planning area is owned by Washington State Department of Fish and
Wildlife.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for action in this project is to improve
health, vigor, and resilience to fire, insects, and disease in upland
forests that are outside their historical 3 pre-fire suppression
conditions for species composition, structural diversity, stocking
densities, and fuel loads. Additionally there is a need to provide
sawlogs and wood fiber products for utilization by regional and local
industry.
Findings from historical range of variability analysis show that
dry upland forest sites once dominated by old forest stands of
ponderosa pine have closed in with shade tolerant species such as
Douglas-fir and grand fir. Species composition on dry-forest sites
indicates that Douglas-fir and grand fir are over-represented, and
ponderosa pine is under-represented. For moist forest sites, species
composition analysis shows that Douglas-fir, western larch, and
lodgepole pine are under-represented and below their historical range,
while grand fir and spruce-fir are over-represented. Findings also show
that existing insect and disease susceptibility based upon historical
range of variability is well above normal levels for defoliators
(western spruce budworm and Douglas-fir tussock moth), fir engraver
beetles, and root diseases (Armillaria and laminated root disease). The
following statements summarize the purpose of and need for action in
South George project planning area:
Vegetation--There is a need to manage vegetation composition,
structure, stand density, and diversity of landscape patterns toward
desired future conditions across the landscape by favoring fire
tolerant species, increasing old forest structure, and reducing
stocking density to levels that resist insects, diseases, and stand-
replacing wildfire(s).
Fuels--There is a need to improve suppression capability near
private lands, and treat forest stands that deviate from natural fire
regimes in terms of fire return interval and vegetative change from
historical composition and density, specifically in condition class 2
(moderately altered from historical range) and condition class 3
(significantly altered from historical range). This would decrease the
potential risk to wildfires of uncharacteristic intensity by reducing
fuel loads to levels expected under natural fire disturbance regimes.
This would be achieved by lowering stand densities, increasing the
relative abundance of fire tolerant species, reducing existing ladder,
surface, and canopy fuels, and reintroducing landscape prescribed fire
into the ecosystem.
Timber Production--There is a need to provide sawlogs and wood
fiber for utilization by regional and local economies.
Proposed Action--Following are brief descriptions of activities
proposed for implementation, along with associated activities that
would occur concurrently.
Timber Harvest--Commercially harvest approximately 4,200 acres.
Free thinning (an unevenaged prescription utilized when remaining
structure and composition is paramount and suited for restoring old-
growth character of forests as well as reducing risk of wildfire) would
be the primary silviculture prescription (approximately 3,300 acres).
Some shelterwood and seed-tree prescriptions (approximately 900 acres)
would be used in declining stands where thinning would not restore
stand health or vigor. Treatments would tend to favor early seral tree
species such as ponderosa pine and western larch. Harvest methods would
include conventional ground based tractor logging (approximately 3,000
acres), skyline logging (approximately 900 acres) and helicopter
logging (approximately 300 acres). Some treatment units may include the
removal of sawlogs, small diameter trees (generally less than 7.0
inches diameter at breast height), and excess down wood for use as
woody biomass products. Harvest objectives would vary by stand
condition and fuel management objectives. The focus of treatment would
be based on the desired quality of each treatment area after management
rather than the quantity of products removed from each area.
Fuel Treatments (activity and natural)--Treat to convert stands in
condition classes 2 and 3 to condition class 1 (within historical
range). Treatments would be designed to reduce ladder fuels to lower
the risk of fire spread into the upper canopy, and reduce ground fuel
that could contribute to uncharacteristic wildfire intensity and
resource damage. Treatments would
[[Page 9983]]
also reduce fuel continuity in areas adjacent to private lands.
Treatment objectives would be achieved though a combination of the
following activities (more than one treatment may occur on a single
acre): mechanical thinning (approximately 1,300 acres), prescribed
burning of activity fuels (approximately 2,100 acres), grapple piling
of activity fuels (approximately 1,000 acres) and yarding with tops
attached. Non-commercial thinning by hand or mechanical methods would
remove trees that are less than 10 inches diameter at breast height in
stands with excess ladder fuels (approximately 200 acres).
Road Management--To accomplish implementation of proposed
activities approximately 32 miles of closed system roads and 45 miles
of seasonally open roads would be used as haul routes. All system roads
would remain the same after project implementation, closed roads would
continue to be closed and seasonally open roads would continue with
that designation. Approximately 3.0 miles of temporary road would be
constructed, of which 1.4 miles would be constructed over previous road
templates. All temporary roads would be decommissioned after project
activity use. No new road construction is proposed.
Danger Tree Removal--Danger trees would be felled and removed along
all previously described haul routes used for timber sale activity. If
considered economically feasible, they would be sold as part of a
timber sale. Danger trees within Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas
(RHCAs) would not be removed; they would be cut and left to provide
additional coarse woody debris.
Landscape Prescribed Fire--Landscape prescribed fire would occur
across approximately 3,000 acres within the project planning area. This
treatment would reintroduce fire to a fire-dependent ecosystem to
lessen the effects of a future uncharacteristic large wildfire and
improve forage quality for big game. In the project planning area, fire
intensities would be kept low by keeping fire out of the overstory and
burning mainly surface fuels. Individual tree and group torching would
likely occur in areas where there is sufficient ladder fuels and in
timber stands with high occurrences of mistletoe. Upon completion the
area would likely be a mosaic of unburned, lightly burned, moderately
burned, and intensely burned patches.
Responsible Official
Monte Fujishin, District Ranger, Pomeroy Ranger District, Umatilla
National Forest, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, Washington 99347.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether to approve the proposed action
or any alternative way to achieve the desired outcome. No Forest Plan
amendment is proposed.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement. Comments and
input regarding this proposed action are being requested from the
public and other interested parties in conjunction with this notice of
intent. The comment period will be open for thirty days, beginning on
the date of publication of this notice of intent. Response to the draft
environmental impact statement will be sought from interested tribes
and public beginning approximately in September 2009.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation
of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and comments. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
Dated: March 2, 2009.
Monte Fujishin,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-4764 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M