Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy Ranger District, Pomeroy, WA; South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project, 9981-9983 [E9-4764]

Download as PDF 9981 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Notices REPORTING BURDEN Estimated number of respondents Respondent Responses annually per respondent Total annual responses Estimated average number of hours per response Estimated total annual hours of response burden SFA Directors SFA Director Survey Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ 600 150 1.00 1.00 600 150 0.4175 0.0500 250.500 7.500 300 75 1.00 1.00 300 75 0.3006 0.0500 90.180 3.750 600 150 1.00 1.00 900 225 0.3785 0.0500 340.680 11.250 900 47 1.00 1.00 900 47 0.3340 0.0500 300.600 2.350 900 47 1.00 1.00 900 47 6.1002 0.0500 5,490.180 2.350 900 47 1.00 1.00 1,800 94 3.2171 0.0500 5,790.780 4.700 1.00 1.00 855 92 0.3340 0.0500 285.570 4.600 SFA Recruitment Interview Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ Total for SFA Directors Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ School Foodservice Managers School Food Service Manager Survey Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ Menu Survey Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ Total for School Food Service Managers Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ Principals Completed interviews ........................................................... Attempted interviews ............................................................ 855 92 School Liaisons Completed checklists ........................................................... Attempted checklists ............................................................ 855 92 1.00 1.00 855 92 0.5000 0.0500 427.500 4.600 Total Responding Burden ............................................. 3,591 1.37 4,913 1.3983 6,869.680 Estimated Time per Response: 1.3983 hours. As shown in the above table, the estimated time of response varies from 20 minutes (0.3340 hours) to 6.1002 hours for responders and 5 minutes for non-responders, depending on the respondent group and instrument. dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES Dated: March 3, 2009. E. Enrique Gomez, Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. E9–4838 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:28 Mar 06, 2009 Jkt 217001 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy Ranger District, Pomeroy, WA; South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to disclose environmental effects on proposed resource management actions in South George project planning area. This project would improve the health and vigor of upland forest stands by PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 managing vegetation composition, structure, stand density, and diversity, and decrease the susceptibility to future wildland fires of uncharacteristic intensity by reducing ladder, surface, and canopy fuels. The project planning area is approximately 21,000 acres in size. Proposed project activities consist of commercial timber harvest, including treatment of activity and natural fuels within harvest units, non commercial thinning for fuels reduction purposes, temporary road construction (that will be decommissioned after project use), danger tree removal along haul routes, and landscape prescribed burning. DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by April 8, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected September E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1 dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES 9982 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Notices 2009 and the final environmental impact statement is expected December 2009. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Monte Fujishin, District Ranger, Pomeroy Ranger District, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, WA 99347. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to comments-pacificnorthwest-umatillapomeroy@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to (509) 843–4621. Comments may be hand delivered to the Pomeroy Ranger District office between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and comments. The submission of timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer’s ability to participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review. Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Koberstein, Project Team Leader, Pomeroy Ranger District, telephone (509) 843–1891 or e-mail ekoberstein@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: South George project planning area is primarily located in Asotin County, Washington with a small portion in Garfield County, Washington. The legal description of the area is as follows: portions of T.7N., R.44E., section 1; T.7N., R.43E., sections 1–2; T.8N., R.43E., sections 1, 2, 10–15, 21–28, 3336; T.8N., R.44E., sections 5–8, 17–20, 26–36; and T. 9N., R.43E., section 35. It is within South Fork Asotin Creek and Upper George Creek Subwatersheds of Asotin Watershed. Asotin Creek and Wenatchee Creek inventoried roadless areas (IRAs) are adjacent on the west and south sides of the project planning VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:28 Mar 06, 2009 Jkt 217001 area. Existing forest roads (4400, 4300, and 4304) separate the IRAs from the project planning area boundary. Anatone Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) area is near the eastern boundary of the project planning area and is identified in the Asotin County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). Approximately 550 acres within the project planning area is owned by Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife. Purpose and Need for Action The purpose and need for action in this project is to improve health, vigor, and resilience to fire, insects, and disease in upland forests that are outside their historical 3 pre-fire suppression conditions for species composition, structural diversity, stocking densities, and fuel loads. Additionally there is a need to provide sawlogs and wood fiber products for utilization by regional and local industry. Findings from historical range of variability analysis show that dry upland forest sites once dominated by old forest stands of ponderosa pine have closed in with shade tolerant species such as Douglas-fir and grand fir. Species composition on dry-forest sites indicates that Douglas-fir and grand fir are over-represented, and ponderosa pine is under-represented. For moist forest sites, species composition analysis shows that Douglas-fir, western larch, and lodgepole pine are underrepresented and below their historical range, while grand fir and spruce-fir are over-represented. Findings also show that existing insect and disease susceptibility based upon historical range of variability is well above normal levels for defoliators (western spruce budworm and Douglas-fir tussock moth), fir engraver beetles, and root diseases (Armillaria and laminated root disease). The following statements summarize the purpose of and need for action in South George project planning area: Vegetation—There is a need to manage vegetation composition, structure, stand density, and diversity of landscape patterns toward desired future conditions across the landscape by favoring fire tolerant species, increasing old forest structure, and reducing stocking density to levels that resist insects, diseases, and standreplacing wildfire(s). Fuels—There is a need to improve suppression capability near private lands, and treat forest stands that deviate from natural fire regimes in terms of fire return interval and vegetative change from historical PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 composition and density, specifically in condition class 2 (moderately altered from historical range) and condition class 3 (significantly altered from historical range). This would decrease the potential risk to wildfires of uncharacteristic intensity by reducing fuel loads to levels expected under natural fire disturbance regimes. This would be achieved by lowering stand densities, increasing the relative abundance of fire tolerant species, reducing existing ladder, surface, and canopy fuels, and reintroducing landscape prescribed fire into the ecosystem. Timber Production—There is a need to provide sawlogs and wood fiber for utilization by regional and local economies. Proposed Action—Following are brief descriptions of activities proposed for implementation, along with associated activities that would occur concurrently. Timber Harvest—Commercially harvest approximately 4,200 acres. Free thinning (an unevenaged prescription utilized when remaining structure and composition is paramount and suited for restoring old-growth character of forests as well as reducing risk of wildfire) would be the primary silviculture prescription (approximately 3,300 acres). Some shelterwood and seed-tree prescriptions (approximately 900 acres) would be used in declining stands where thinning would not restore stand health or vigor. Treatments would tend to favor early seral tree species such as ponderosa pine and western larch. Harvest methods would include conventional ground based tractor logging (approximately 3,000 acres), skyline logging (approximately 900 acres) and helicopter logging (approximately 300 acres). Some treatment units may include the removal of sawlogs, small diameter trees (generally less than 7.0 inches diameter at breast height), and excess down wood for use as woody biomass products. Harvest objectives would vary by stand condition and fuel management objectives. The focus of treatment would be based on the desired quality of each treatment area after management rather than the quantity of products removed from each area. Fuel Treatments (activity and natural)—Treat to convert stands in condition classes 2 and 3 to condition class 1 (within historical range). Treatments would be designed to reduce ladder fuels to lower the risk of fire spread into the upper canopy, and reduce ground fuel that could contribute to uncharacteristic wildfire intensity and resource damage. Treatments would E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1 dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 44 / Monday, March 9, 2009 / Notices also reduce fuel continuity in areas adjacent to private lands. Treatment objectives would be achieved though a combination of the following activities (more than one treatment may occur on a single acre): mechanical thinning (approximately 1,300 acres), prescribed burning of activity fuels (approximately 2,100 acres), grapple piling of activity fuels (approximately 1,000 acres) and yarding with tops attached. Noncommercial thinning by hand or mechanical methods would remove trees that are less than 10 inches diameter at breast height in stands with excess ladder fuels (approximately 200 acres). Road Management—To accomplish implementation of proposed activities approximately 32 miles of closed system roads and 45 miles of seasonally open roads would be used as haul routes. All system roads would remain the same after project implementation, closed roads would continue to be closed and seasonally open roads would continue with that designation. Approximately 3.0 miles of temporary road would be constructed, of which 1.4 miles would be constructed over previous road templates. All temporary roads would be decommissioned after project activity use. No new road construction is proposed. Danger Tree Removal—Danger trees would be felled and removed along all previously described haul routes used for timber sale activity. If considered economically feasible, they would be sold as part of a timber sale. Danger trees within Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas (RHCAs) would not be removed; they would be cut and left to provide additional coarse woody debris. Landscape Prescribed Fire— Landscape prescribed fire would occur across approximately 3,000 acres within the project planning area. This treatment would reintroduce fire to a fire-dependent ecosystem to lessen the effects of a future uncharacteristic large wildfire and improve forage quality for big game. In the project planning area, fire intensities would be kept low by keeping fire out of the overstory and burning mainly surface fuels. Individual tree and group torching would likely occur in areas where there is sufficient ladder fuels and in timber stands with high occurrences of mistletoe. Upon completion the area would likely be a mosaic of unburned, lightly burned, moderately burned, and intensely burned patches. Responsible Official Monte Fujishin, District Ranger, Pomeroy Ranger District, Umatilla VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:28 Mar 06, 2009 Jkt 217001 National Forest, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, Washington 99347. Nature of Decision To Be Made The decision to be made is whether to approve the proposed action or any alternative way to achieve the desired outcome. No Forest Plan amendment is proposed. Scoping Process This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. Comments and input regarding this proposed action are being requested from the public and other interested parties in conjunction with this notice of intent. The comment period will be open for thirty days, beginning on the date of publication of this notice of intent. Response to the draft environmental impact statement will be sought from interested tribes and public beginning approximately in September 2009. It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency’s preparation of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly articulate the reviewer’s concerns and comments. The submission of timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer’s ability to participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review. Dated: March 2, 2009. Monte Fujishin, District Ranger. [FR Doc. E9–4764 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000, as amended, (Pub. L. 110–343), the Boise and Payette National Forests’ Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public. DATES: Thursday, March 19, beginning at 10:30 a.m. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 9983 ADDRESSES: Idaho Counties Risk Management Program Building, 3100 South Vista Avenue, Boise, Idaho. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Brandel, Designated Federal Official, at (208) 347–0301 or e-mail kbrandel@fs.fed.us. Dated: February 27, 2009. Suzanne C. Rainville, Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest. [FR Doc. E9–4765 Filed 3–6–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration A–331–802 Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Ecuador: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from Ecuador with respect to 81 companies. The respondents which the Department selected for individual examination are Promarisco, S.A. (Promarisco) and Sociedad Nacional de Galapagos, S.A. (Songa). The respondents which were not selected for individual examination are listed in the ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’ section of this notice. This is the third administrative review of this order. The period of review (POR) covers February 1, 2007, through August 14, 2007. We preliminarily determine that sales made to the United States by Promarisco and Songa have been made below normal value (NV). In addition, based on the preliminary results for the respondents selected for individual examination, we have determined a preliminary weighted–average margin for those companies that were not individually examined. If the preliminary results are adopted in our final results of administrative review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results. EFFECTIVE DATE: March 9, 2009. E:\FR\FM\09MRN1.SGM 09MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 44 (Monday, March 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9981-9983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Umatilla National Forest, Pomeroy Ranger District, Pomeroy, WA; 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) to disclose environmental effects on proposed resource 
management actions in South George project planning area. This project 
would improve the health and vigor of upland forest stands by managing 
vegetation composition, structure, stand density, and diversity, and 
decrease the susceptibility to future wildland fires of 
uncharacteristic intensity by reducing ladder, surface, and canopy 
fuels. The project planning area is approximately 21,000 acres in size. 
Proposed project activities consist of commercial timber harvest, 
including treatment of activity and natural fuels within harvest units, 
non commercial thinning for fuels reduction purposes, temporary road 
construction (that will be decommissioned after project use), danger 
tree removal along haul routes, and landscape prescribed burning.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by April 8, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected 
September

[[Page 9982]]

2009 and the final environmental impact statement is expected December 
2009.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Monte Fujishin, District Ranger, 
Pomeroy Ranger District, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, WA 99347. 
Comments may also be sent via e-mail to comments-pacificnorthwest-
umatilla-pomeroy@fs.fed.us or via facsimile to (509) 843-4621. Comments 
may be hand delivered to the Pomeroy Ranger District office between the 
hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 
Federal holidays.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation 
of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and comments. The submission of 
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to 
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
    Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names 
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record 
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be 
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide 
the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent 
administrative appeal or judicial review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ed Koberstein, Project Team Leader, 
Pomeroy Ranger District, telephone (509) 843-1891 or e-mail 
ekoberstein@fs.fed.us. Individuals who use telecommunication devices 
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service 
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, 
Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: South George project planning area is 
primarily located in Asotin County, Washington with a small portion in 
Garfield County, Washington. The legal description of the area is as 
follows: portions of T.7N., R.44E., section 1; T.7N., R.43E., sections 
1-2; T.8N., R.43E., sections 1, 2, 10-15, 21-28, 33-36; T.8N., R.44E., 
sections 5-8, 17-20, 26-36; and T. 9N., R.43E., section 35. It is 
within South Fork Asotin Creek and Upper George Creek Subwatersheds of 
Asotin Watershed. Asotin Creek and Wenatchee Creek inventoried roadless 
areas (IRAs) are adjacent on the west and south sides of the project 
planning area. Existing forest roads (4400, 4300, and 4304) separate 
the IRAs from the project planning area boundary. Anatone Wildland 
Urban Interface (WUI) area is near the eastern boundary of the project 
planning area and is identified in the Asotin County Community Wildfire 
Protection Plan (CWPP). Approximately 550 acres within the project 
planning area is owned by Washington State Department of Fish and 
Wildlife.

Purpose and Need for Action

    The purpose and need for action in this project is to improve 
health, vigor, and resilience to fire, insects, and disease in upland 
forests that are outside their historical 3 pre-fire suppression 
conditions for species composition, structural diversity, stocking 
densities, and fuel loads. Additionally there is a need to provide 
sawlogs and wood fiber products for utilization by regional and local 
industry.
    Findings from historical range of variability analysis show that 
dry upland forest sites once dominated by old forest stands of 
ponderosa pine have closed in with shade tolerant species such as 
Douglas-fir and grand fir. Species composition on dry-forest sites 
indicates that Douglas-fir and grand fir are over-represented, and 
ponderosa pine is under-represented. For moist forest sites, species 
composition analysis shows that Douglas-fir, western larch, and 
lodgepole pine are under-represented and below their historical range, 
while grand fir and spruce-fir are over-represented. Findings also show 
that existing insect and disease susceptibility based upon historical 
range of variability is well above normal levels for defoliators 
(western spruce budworm and Douglas-fir tussock moth), fir engraver 
beetles, and root diseases (Armillaria and laminated root disease). The 
following statements summarize the purpose of and need for action in 
South George project planning area:
    Vegetation--There is a need to manage vegetation composition, 
structure, stand density, and diversity of landscape patterns toward 
desired future conditions across the landscape by favoring fire 
tolerant species, increasing old forest structure, and reducing 
stocking density to levels that resist insects, diseases, and stand-
replacing wildfire(s).
    Fuels--There is a need to improve suppression capability near 
private lands, and treat forest stands that deviate from natural fire 
regimes in terms of fire return interval and vegetative change from 
historical composition and density, specifically in condition class 2 
(moderately altered from historical range) and condition class 3 
(significantly altered from historical range). This would decrease the 
potential risk to wildfires of uncharacteristic intensity by reducing 
fuel loads to levels expected under natural fire disturbance regimes. 
This would be achieved by lowering stand densities, increasing the 
relative abundance of fire tolerant species, reducing existing ladder, 
surface, and canopy fuels, and reintroducing landscape prescribed fire 
into the ecosystem.
    Timber Production--There is a need to provide sawlogs and wood 
fiber for utilization by regional and local economies.
    Proposed Action--Following are brief descriptions of activities 
proposed for implementation, along with associated activities that 
would occur concurrently.
    Timber Harvest--Commercially harvest approximately 4,200 acres. 
Free thinning (an unevenaged prescription utilized when remaining 
structure and composition is paramount and suited for restoring old-
growth character of forests as well as reducing risk of wildfire) would 
be the primary silviculture prescription (approximately 3,300 acres). 
Some shelterwood and seed-tree prescriptions (approximately 900 acres) 
would be used in declining stands where thinning would not restore 
stand health or vigor. Treatments would tend to favor early seral tree 
species such as ponderosa pine and western larch. Harvest methods would 
include conventional ground based tractor logging (approximately 3,000 
acres), skyline logging (approximately 900 acres) and helicopter 
logging (approximately 300 acres). Some treatment units may include the 
removal of sawlogs, small diameter trees (generally less than 7.0 
inches diameter at breast height), and excess down wood for use as 
woody biomass products. Harvest objectives would vary by stand 
condition and fuel management objectives. The focus of treatment would 
be based on the desired quality of each treatment area after management 
rather than the quantity of products removed from each area.
    Fuel Treatments (activity and natural)--Treat to convert stands in 
condition classes 2 and 3 to condition class 1 (within historical 
range). Treatments would be designed to reduce ladder fuels to lower 
the risk of fire spread into the upper canopy, and reduce ground fuel 
that could contribute to uncharacteristic wildfire intensity and 
resource damage. Treatments would

[[Page 9983]]

also reduce fuel continuity in areas adjacent to private lands. 
Treatment objectives would be achieved though a combination of the 
following activities (more than one treatment may occur on a single 
acre): mechanical thinning (approximately 1,300 acres), prescribed 
burning of activity fuels (approximately 2,100 acres), grapple piling 
of activity fuels (approximately 1,000 acres) and yarding with tops 
attached. Non-commercial thinning by hand or mechanical methods would 
remove trees that are less than 10 inches diameter at breast height in 
stands with excess ladder fuels (approximately 200 acres).
    Road Management--To accomplish implementation of proposed 
activities approximately 32 miles of closed system roads and 45 miles 
of seasonally open roads would be used as haul routes. All system roads 
would remain the same after project implementation, closed roads would 
continue to be closed and seasonally open roads would continue with 
that designation. Approximately 3.0 miles of temporary road would be 
constructed, of which 1.4 miles would be constructed over previous road 
templates. All temporary roads would be decommissioned after project 
activity use. No new road construction is proposed.
    Danger Tree Removal--Danger trees would be felled and removed along 
all previously described haul routes used for timber sale activity. If 
considered economically feasible, they would be sold as part of a 
timber sale. Danger trees within Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas 
(RHCAs) would not be removed; they would be cut and left to provide 
additional coarse woody debris.
    Landscape Prescribed Fire--Landscape prescribed fire would occur 
across approximately 3,000 acres within the project planning area. This 
treatment would reintroduce fire to a fire-dependent ecosystem to 
lessen the effects of a future uncharacteristic large wildfire and 
improve forage quality for big game. In the project planning area, fire 
intensities would be kept low by keeping fire out of the overstory and 
burning mainly surface fuels. Individual tree and group torching would 
likely occur in areas where there is sufficient ladder fuels and in 
timber stands with high occurrences of mistletoe. Upon completion the 
area would likely be a mosaic of unburned, lightly burned, moderately 
burned, and intensely burned patches.

Responsible Official

    Monte Fujishin, District Ranger, Pomeroy Ranger District, Umatilla 
National Forest, 71 West Main Street, Pomeroy, Washington 99347.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The decision to be made is whether to approve the proposed action 
or any alternative way to achieve the desired outcome. No Forest Plan 
amendment is proposed.

Scoping Process

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides 
the development of the environmental impact statement. Comments and 
input regarding this proposed action are being requested from the 
public and other interested parties in conjunction with this notice of 
intent. The comment period will be open for thirty days, beginning on 
the date of publication of this notice of intent. Response to the draft 
environmental impact statement will be sought from interested tribes 
and public beginning approximately in September 2009.
    It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times 
and in such a manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation 
of the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be 
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly 
articulate the reviewer's concerns and comments. The submission of 
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to 
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.

    Dated: March 2, 2009.
Monte Fujishin,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-4764 Filed 3-6-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.