Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 9613-9615 [E9-4515]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 42 / Thursday, March 5, 2009 / Notices
Unauthorized Committees (PACs and
Party Committees)
Political committees filing on a
semiannual basis in 2009 are subject to
special election reporting if they make
previously undisclosed contributions or
expenditures in connection with the
New York Special General Election by
the close of books for the applicable
report(s). (See chart below for the
closing date for each report.)
Political committees filing monthly
that support candidates in the New York
Special General Election should
continue to file according to the
monthly reporting schedule.
Additional disclosure information in
connection with the New York Special
Election may be found on the FEC Web
site at https://www.fec.gov/info/
report_dates.shtml.
Calendar of Reporting Dates for New
York Special Election
Quarterly Filing Political Committees
Involved in the Special General (03/31/
09) Must File:
Close of books 1
Report
Pre-General .........................................................................................................
April Quarterly ......................................................................................................
Post-General ........................................................................................................
July Quarterly .......................................................................................................
9613
Reg./cert. & overnight mailing
deadline
03/11/09
03/31/09
04/20/09
06/30/09
03/16/09
04/15/09
04/30/09
07/15/09
Filing deadline
03/19/09
04/15/09
04/30/09
07/15/09
Semiannual Filing Political
Committees Involved in the Special
General (03/31/09) Must File:
Close of books 1
Report
Pre-General .........................................................................................................
Post-General ........................................................................................................
Mid-Year ..............................................................................................................
Reg./cert. & overnight mailing
deadline
03/11/09
04/20/09
06/30/09
03/16/09
04/30/09
07/31/09
Filing deadline
03/19/09
04/30/09
07/31/09
1 The reporting period always begins the day after the closing date of the last report filed. If the committee is new and has not previously filed
a report, the first report must cover all activity that occurred before the committee registered up through the close of books for the first report
due.
Dated: February 27, 2009.
On behalf of the Commission,
Steven T. Walther,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–4651 Filed 3–4–09; 8:45 am]
or matters affecting a particular
employee.
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9–4662 Filed 3–4–09; 8:45 am]
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:
Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone:
(202) 694–1220.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
BILLING CODE 6715–01–M
Sunshine Act Notices
Federal Election Commission.
Executive Session
scheduled for February 24, 2009. Open
Meeting scheduled for February 26,
2009. Executive Session scheduled for
March 3, 2009. Open Meeting scheduled
for March 5, 2009.
DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 4,
2009, at 10 a.m. and Thursday, March
5, 2009, at 2 p.m.
PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington,
DC.
STATUS: These meetings will be closed
to the public.
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance
matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C.
437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil
actions or proceedings or arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
CANCELLATIONS:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Mar 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project:
‘‘Coordinating Care across Primary Care
and Specialty Care Practices.’’ In
accordance with the Paperwork
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ invites the public
to comment on this proposed
information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by May 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
e-mail at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
‘‘Coordinating Care Across Primary Care
and Specialty Care Practices’’
AHRQ proposes an evaluation of the
redesign of the transitions of care
between primary care and specialty care
services. The purpose of the redesign is
to remedy inefficiencies in the current
referral processes that threaten care
quality and safety, and system
efficiency. This redesign is being
implemented at the Boston Medical
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
9614
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 42 / Thursday, March 5, 2009 / Notices
Center (BMC), and two affiliated health
centers. The evaluation will be
conducted for AHRQ by its contractor,
the Boston University School of Public
Health (BUSPH).
Care coordination has been identified
by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) as a
key strategy with potential to improve
the effectiveness, safety and efficiency
of the health care system. At the same
time, care coordination, particularly in
transitions among sites of care, is often
lacking. Research shows that problems
in coordination of care and common
failures in patients’ transitioning
between and among systems typically
create serious quality concerns in many
settings. Individuals moving across
systems of care and between care
providers are vulnerable to fragmented
and disjointed care (Coleman et al.,
2004). Uncoordinated and fragmented
transitions can lead to a wide range of
costly problems and threats to patient
safety including greater use of hospital
and emergency services (Coleman et al.,
2004), ordering and completion of
redundant tests (Coleman & Berenson,
2004), prescription and medication
errors and use of poly-pharmacy by
multiple providers (Coleman &
Berenson, 2004). The end result is often
confusion about conflicting care plans
and lack of follow-up care. The aim of
this evaluation is to address this
confusion and fragmentation by
expanding knowledge of how to
improve the experience and outcomes
for patients in transitions of care
between primary care and specialty
practices. The initial focus is on
referrals between primary care and two
specialties: gastroenterology (GI) and
obstetrics (OB). The redesigned referral
system will be tested by implementing
it in three participating primary care
sites and two specialty clinics. We
expect that the lessons learned from this
evaluation will provide a model and
tools that can later easily be tested and
applied to other sites and specialties in
the BMC system and provide lessons
learned to other systems seeking to
sustainably improve their referral
systems.
This project is being conducted
pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory authority
to conduct research and evaluations on
health care and systems for the delivery
of such care, including activities with
respect to: the quality, effectiveness,
efficiency, appropriateness and value of
health care services; clinical practice,
including primary care and practiceoriented research; and health care costs,
productivity, organization, and market
forces. See 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(l), (4) and
(6).
The overall aims of the evaluation are
to provide a rigorous assessment of the
success of the redesigned referral system
in meeting its improvement goals and to
gain an understanding of the
implementation of the redesigned
system.
Method of Collection
This evaluation will include the
following data collections:
b Medical record data will be used
to analyze aspects of the referral
process, such as percentage of items on
referral forms filled in, proportion of
specialty appointments made, time
between referral and initial specialty
appointment. Patients’ personal health
data will not be analyzed. The medical
record data will be used to measure both
the fidelity of the redesigned system
within the practices and success in
meeting redesign improvement goal
(outcome) indicators. The medical
record data will be extracted by project
staff and will not impose a burden on
the participating health care sites.
b Patient satisfaction survey will be
administered to selected patients twice
during the project. The questionnaire
will be designed to assess patient
experience in the referral system. Only
patients with referrals to obstetrics or
gastroenterology specialists will receive
the questionnaire. These two
questionnaires are essentially identical
and vary only by the type of specialist
seen; for the purpose of this clearance
request they are treated as identical.
Results from the first survey will
provide baseline data; results from the
second survey will provide the basis for
assessing change over time and fidelity
to the new system design.
b Focus groups with providers,
clinical staff and administrative staff
will be conducted in each primary care
site and in each specialty practice. The
group sessions will pursue three topics:
the extent to which the new system is
being used as intended; the perceived
effectiveness of the new system as
implemented; and the organization and
culture of the clinical setting. Themes
from the focus groups will be used to
assess fidelity of implementation,
performance outcomes and factors
affecting fidelity and outcomes.
b Implementation logs and meeting
notes kept by the project team
throughout the redesign implementation
will document the implementation
process, including factors affecting the
process, challenges encountered, and
strategies for dealing with the
challenges. This component of the
evaluation will not impose a burden on
the participating health care sites.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden hours for the
respondents’ time to participate in this
two year evaluation. The patient
satisfaction survey questionnaire will be
completed by a total of 600 patients
prior to the referral process redesign and
600 patients after the completion of the
redesign (Exhibit 1 shows 300 per year).
The questionnaire is estimated to take 6
minutes to complete. Focus groups will
be conducted with about 21 clinical
staff at each of the 3 primary care sites
and 2 specialty care sites (Exhibit 1
shows 2.5 sites per year). Each focus
group session will last about 45
minutes. The total annualized burden is
estimated to be 99 hours.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated
annualized cost burden associated with
the respondents’ time to participate in
this project. The total annualized cost
burden is estimated to be $2,620.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Form name
Number of
responses per
respondent
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Patient satisfaction survey .............................................................................
Focus groups .................................................................................................
300
2.5
2
21
6/60
45/60
60
39
Total ........................................................................................................
302.5
na
na
99
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Mar 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
9615
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 42 / Thursday, March 5, 2009 / Notices
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Form name
Total burden
hours
Average
hourly wage
rate*
Total cost
burden
Patient satisfaction survey .............................................................................
Focus groups .................................................................................................
300
2.5
60
39
$19.29
37.50
$1,157
1,463
Total ........................................................................................................
302.5
99
na
2,620
* The hourly wage for the patient surveys is based on the national average wage. The hourly wage for the focus groups is based upon the
weighted mean of the average wages for physicians ($58.76, n=45), clinical administrative staff ($17.64, n=30) and other clinical staff ($25.48,
n=30). National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. June
2007, Summary 07–03, https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncblO9lO.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2008.
Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal
Government
Exhibit 3 shows the estimated total
and annualized cost for this two-year
evaluation. The total cost is $155,110
and includes $23,267 for project
development, $32,573 for data
collection activities, $31,022 for data
processing and analysis, $15,511 for the
publication of results, $12,408 for
project management and $40,329 for
overhead.
EXHIBIT 3—ESTIMATED TOTAL AND ANNUALIZED COST
Cost component
Total cost
Annualized
cost
Project Development .......................................................................................................................................................
Data Collection Activities .................................................................................................................................................
Data Processing and Analysis .........................................................................................................................................
Publication of Results ......................................................................................................................................................
Project Management ........................................................................................................................................................
Overhead .........................................................................................................................................................................
$23,267
32,573
31,022
15,511
12,408
40,329
$11,633
16,287
15,511
7,756
6,204
20,164
Total ..........................................................................................................................................................................
155,110
77,555
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Request for Comments
In accordance with the above-cited
Paperwork Reduction Act legislation,
comments on AHRQ’s information
collection are requested with regard to
any of the following: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
AHRQ health care research, quality
improvement and information
dissemination functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:49 Mar 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dated: February 24, 2009.
Carol M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9–4515 Filed 3–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–M
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–09–08AR]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–4766 or send an
e-mail to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Proposed Project
CDC Cervical Cancer Study (CX3)—
New—National Center for Chronic
Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The National Breast and Cervical
Cancer Early Detection Program
(NBCCEDP) is the only organized
national screening program in the
United States that offers breast and
cervical cancer screening to
underserved women. Screening policies
for cervical cancer in the program
include an annual Pap test until a
woman has had three consecutive
normal Pap tests. However, human
papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is
not currently a reimbursable expense
under NBCCEDP guidelines, therefore
adopting HPV DNA testing along with
Pap testing in women over 30 could
help the program better utilize resources
by extending the screening interval of
women who are cytology negative and
HPV test negative, which is estimated to
be 80–90% of women.
CDC proposes to conduct a pilot study
at 18 clinics in the state of Illinois in
order to assess the feasibility,
acceptability and barriers to use the
HPV DNA test in conjunction with Pap
E:\FR\FM\05MRN1.SGM
05MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 42 (Thursday, March 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9613-9615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4515]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection
project: ``Coordinating Care across Primary Care and Specialty Care
Practices.'' In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), AHRQ invites the public to comment on this
proposed information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by May 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by e-mail at
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection
instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be
obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by e-mail at
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
``Coordinating Care Across Primary Care and Specialty Care Practices''
AHRQ proposes an evaluation of the redesign of the transitions of
care between primary care and specialty care services. The purpose of
the redesign is to remedy inefficiencies in the current referral
processes that threaten care quality and safety, and system efficiency.
This redesign is being implemented at the Boston Medical
[[Page 9614]]
Center (BMC), and two affiliated health centers. The evaluation will be
conducted for AHRQ by its contractor, the Boston University School of
Public Health (BUSPH).
Care coordination has been identified by the Institute of Medicine
(IOM) as a key strategy with potential to improve the effectiveness,
safety and efficiency of the health care system. At the same time, care
coordination, particularly in transitions among sites of care, is often
lacking. Research shows that problems in coordination of care and
common failures in patients' transitioning between and among systems
typically create serious quality concerns in many settings. Individuals
moving across systems of care and between care providers are vulnerable
to fragmented and disjointed care (Coleman et al., 2004). Uncoordinated
and fragmented transitions can lead to a wide range of costly problems
and threats to patient safety including greater use of hospital and
emergency services (Coleman et al., 2004), ordering and completion of
redundant tests (Coleman & Berenson, 2004), prescription and medication
errors and use of poly-pharmacy by multiple providers (Coleman &
Berenson, 2004). The end result is often confusion about conflicting
care plans and lack of follow-up care. The aim of this evaluation is to
address this confusion and fragmentation by expanding knowledge of how
to improve the experience and outcomes for patients in transitions of
care between primary care and specialty practices. The initial focus is
on referrals between primary care and two specialties: gastroenterology
(GI) and obstetrics (OB). The redesigned referral system will be tested
by implementing it in three participating primary care sites and two
specialty clinics. We expect that the lessons learned from this
evaluation will provide a model and tools that can later easily be
tested and applied to other sites and specialties in the BMC system and
provide lessons learned to other systems seeking to sustainably improve
their referral systems.
This project is being conducted pursuant to AHRQ's statutory
authority to conduct research and evaluations on health care and
systems for the delivery of such care, including activities with
respect to: the quality, effectiveness, efficiency, appropriateness and
value of health care services; clinical practice, including primary
care and practice-oriented research; and health care costs,
productivity, organization, and market forces. See 42 U.S.C.
299a(a)(l), (4) and (6).
The overall aims of the evaluation are to provide a rigorous
assessment of the success of the redesigned referral system in meeting
its improvement goals and to gain an understanding of the
implementation of the redesigned system.
Method of Collection
This evaluation will include the following data collections:
[ballot] Medical record data will be used to analyze aspects of the
referral process, such as percentage of items on referral forms filled
in, proportion of specialty appointments made, time between referral
and initial specialty appointment. Patients' personal health data will
not be analyzed. The medical record data will be used to measure both
the fidelity of the redesigned system within the practices and success
in meeting redesign improvement goal (outcome) indicators. The medical
record data will be extracted by project staff and will not impose a
burden on the participating health care sites.
[ballot] Patient satisfaction survey will be administered to
selected patients twice during the project. The questionnaire will be
designed to assess patient experience in the referral system. Only
patients with referrals to obstetrics or gastroenterology specialists
will receive the questionnaire. These two questionnaires are
essentially identical and vary only by the type of specialist seen; for
the purpose of this clearance request they are treated as identical.
Results from the first survey will provide baseline data; results from
the second survey will provide the basis for assessing change over time
and fidelity to the new system design.
[ballot] Focus groups with providers, clinical staff and
administrative staff will be conducted in each primary care site and in
each specialty practice. The group sessions will pursue three topics:
the extent to which the new system is being used as intended; the
perceived effectiveness of the new system as implemented; and the
organization and culture of the clinical setting. Themes from the focus
groups will be used to assess fidelity of implementation, performance
outcomes and factors affecting fidelity and outcomes.
[ballot] Implementation logs and meeting notes kept by the project
team throughout the redesign implementation will document the
implementation process, including factors affecting the process,
challenges encountered, and strategies for dealing with the challenges.
This component of the evaluation will not impose a burden on the
participating health care sites.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the
respondents' time to participate in this two year evaluation. The
patient satisfaction survey questionnaire will be completed by a total
of 600 patients prior to the referral process redesign and 600 patients
after the completion of the redesign (Exhibit 1 shows 300 per year).
The questionnaire is estimated to take 6 minutes to complete. Focus
groups will be conducted with about 21 clinical staff at each of the 3
primary care sites and 2 specialty care sites (Exhibit 1 shows 2.5
sites per year). Each focus group session will last about 45 minutes.
The total annualized burden is estimated to be 99 hours.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden associated
with the respondents' time to participate in this project. The total
annualized cost burden is estimated to be $2,620.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Form name Number of responses per Hours per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patient satisfaction survey.................... 300 2 6/60 60
Focus groups................................... 2.5 21 45/60 39
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................... 302.5 na na 99
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 9615]]
Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Total burden Average hourly Total cost
Form name respondents hours wage rate* burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Patient satisfaction survey.................... 300 60 $19.29 $1,157
Focus groups................................... 2.5 39 37.50 1,463
----------------------------------------------------------------
Total...................................... 302.5 99 na 2,620
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The hourly wage for the patient surveys is based on the national average wage. The hourly wage for the focus
groups is based upon the weighted mean of the average wages for physicians ($58.76, n=45), clinical
administrative staff ($17.64, n=30) and other clinical staff ($25.48, n=30). National Compensation Survey:
Occupational Wages in the United States, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. June 2007,
Summary 07-03, https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncblO9lO.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2008.
Estimated Annual Costs to the Federal Government
Exhibit 3 shows the estimated total and annualized cost for this
two-year evaluation. The total cost is $155,110 and includes $23,267
for project development, $32,573 for data collection activities,
$31,022 for data processing and analysis, $15,511 for the publication
of results, $12,408 for project management and $40,329 for overhead.
Exhibit 3--Estimated Total and Annualized Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized
Cost component Total cost cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Development........................... $23,267 $11,633
Data Collection Activities.................... 32,573 16,287
Data Processing and Analysis.................. 31,022 15,511
Publication of Results........................ 15,511 7,756
Project Management............................ 12,408 6,204
Overhead...................................... 40,329 20,164
-------------------------
Total..................................... 155,110 77,555
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for Comments
In accordance with the above-cited Paperwork Reduction Act
legislation, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
AHRQ health care research, quality improvement and information
dissemination functions, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden
(including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of
information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use
of automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: February 24, 2009.
Carol M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. E9-4515 Filed 3-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M