National Transit Database: Policy on Reporting of Coordinated Human Services Transportation Data, 9471-9473 [E9-4634]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 4, 2009 / Notices
requirements of section 4129 while
continuing to ensure that operation of
CMVs by drivers with ITDM will
achieve the requisite level of safety
required of all exemptions granted
under 49 USC. 31136(e).
Section 4129(d) also directed FMCSA
to ensure that drivers of CMVs with
ITDM are not held to a higher standard
than other drivers, with the exception of
limited operating, monitoring and
medical requirements that are deemed
medically necessary. FMCSA concluded
that all of the operating, monitoring and
medical requirements set out in the
September 3, 2003 Notice, except as
modified, were in compliance with
section 4129(d). Therefore, all of the
requirements set out in the September 3,
2003 Notice, except as modified by the
Notice in the Federal Register on
November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
remain in effect.
Issued on: February 26, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–4577 Filed 3–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No: FTA–2008–0009]
National Transit Database: Policy on
Reporting of Coordinated Human
Services Transportation Data
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Final Policy on
Reporting of Coordinated Human
Services Transportation Data to the
National Transit Database.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA)
policy on the reporting of coordinated
human services transportation data to
the National Transit Database (NTD). On
August 12, 2008, FTA proposed a new
policy clarifying how transit providers
reporting to the NTD may include
sponsored trips in their reports. FTA
received two comments on the proposed
policy and is now formally adopting the
new policy.
DATES: Effective Date: March 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
program issues, John D. Giorgis, Office
of Budget and Policy, (202) 366–5430
(telephone); (202) 366–7989 (fax); or
john.giorgis@dot.gov (e-mail). For legal
issues, Richard Wong, Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366–0675
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
(telephone); (202) 366–3809 (fax); or
richard.wong@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Transit Database (NTD)
was established by Congress ‘‘to help
meet the needs of * * * the public for
information on which to base public
transportation service planning * * *’’
(49 U.S.C. 5335). To support this goal,
recipients or beneficiaries of Urbanized
Area Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. 5307) or
Other Than Urbanized Area Formula
Grants (49 U.S.C. 5311) are required to
report to the NTD. Some other providers
of transit service in urbanized areas
report voluntarily to the NTD for
purposes of benefitting their local
urbanized area in the urbanized area
apportionments. Currently, over 650
transit providers in urbanized areas and
over 60 State, Territorial, and Tribal
Departments of Transportation
representing over 1,300 transit providers
in rural areas report to the NTD through
an Internet-based reporting system. Each
year, performance data from the
urbanized area submissions are used to
apportion over $6 billion of FTA funds
under the Urbanized Area Formula
Grants and Fixed-Guideway
Modernization Grants (49 U.S.C.
5309(b)(2)) Programs. These data are
also used in the annual National Transit
Summaries and Trends report, the
biennial Conditions and Performance
Report to Congress, in meeting FTA’s
obligations under the Government
Performance and Results Act, and in
public reports available on https://
www.ntdprogram.gov.
For many years, it has been FTA’s
policy to require urbanized area transit
providers reporting demand response
service to the NTD to exclude from their
reports service data for certain
sponsored trips. These trips were
typically arranged and paid for by a
third party for a specific group of clients
(such as participants in programs like
Medicaid, Head Start, sheltered
workshops, or assisted living centers),
and these sponsored trips were often not
open to the general public at large.
Excluding data for these trips from the
NTD also excluded them from the
calculation of the apportionment of
formula grants for urbanized areas. In
light of FTA’s policies and guidance on
Coordinated Human Services
Transportation, FTA proposed to clarify
this policy for the 2008 NTD Report
Year to specify that transit providers are
to report data for all of their demand
response service as public
transportation, except for those services
that are defined as charter service under
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
9471
FTA’s recently revised charter rule (49
CFR 604, 73 FR 2326, January 14, 2008).
FTA also proposed to require transit
agencies in urbanized areas to
separately report their ‘‘regular unlinked
passenger trips’’ and their ‘‘sponsored
demand response unlinked passenger
trips’’ for demand response service.
II. Comments and FTA Response to
Comments
On August 12, 2008, FTA published
a notice in the Federal Register (73 FR
47641) inviting comments on this
proposed policy on reporting
coordinated human services
transportation data to the NTD. FTA
received two comments on the proposed
change.
One commenter supported the
proposed policy. A second commenter
objected to this policy on the grounds
that the policy would impose NTD
reporting requirements on human
services transportation providers that
are coordinated through a brokerage
operated by a reporting transit provider,
and that the burdensome nature of the
NTD reporting requirements on these
small-scale human service
transportation providers would result in
a reduction in service from these
providers. The commenter noted that
almost all of the human services
transportation providers coordinated
through the brokerage received very
little Federal funding, and that this
Federal funding was usually not
through the Section 5307 Program. The
commenter also noted that many of the
required NTD reporting elements are not
currently collected at all, and the
ridership metrics that are collected are
not compliant with FTA Circular
2710.1A.
Response: FTA clarifies that this
policy only applies to what trips a
transit provider reports to the NTD, but
does not extend NTD reporting
requirements to any other transit
provider. The NTD requires a transit
provider to report all transit trips
provided using its own directlyoperated equipment or through its own
subcontractors. Coordinating a trip
through a brokerage does not create a
subcontractor relationship with the
other human service transportation
providers participating in a brokerage.
Thus, such trips should not be reported
to the NTD by a transit provider
operating a brokerage. The only trips
from the brokerage that the transit
provider should report to the NTD are
those referred to itself and carried out
using its own directly-operated
equipment or using its purchased
transportation subcontractors.
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
9472
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 4, 2009 / Notices
If a transit provider wishes to benefit
from the service data generated by trips
coordinated through a brokerage, it may
do so by requesting a separate NTD
Identification Number (NTD ID) for
making a consolidated report on behalf
of the participants in the brokerage. The
transit provider would then be
responsible for ensuring that this
consolidated report is fully in
compliance with all NTD reporting
requirements found in the Reporting
Manuals and with the Uniform System
of Accounts.
FTA also wishes to clarify that it is
not necessary for the ridership metrics
of unlinked passenger trips (UPT) and
passenger miles traveled (PMT) reported
to the NTD to be collected as described
in FTA Circular 2710.A. This Circular
delineates requirements for reporting
UPT and PMT data through statistical
sampling when 100% counts of UPT
and PMT are either unavailable or
unreliable. Transit providers should
report 100% counts of UPT and PMT to
the NTD whenever they are available
and reliable, and should not report this
data to the NTD through statistical
sampling in these cases. Almost all
demand response systems keep records
of their UPT sufficient to report a 100%
count. Most demand response systems
also record origins and destinations of
their passengers, which may be used to
generate a 100% count of PMT, and so
avoid statistical sampling.
III. Final Policy
This policy shall take effect for the
2008 NTD Report Year, so that any
transit provider wishing to take
advantage of this policy for the 2008
NTD Report Year may do so. Since
many transit providers have already
begun completing their 2008 NTD
Reports, however, FTA will also accept
any reports from the 2008 NTD Report
Year made under the old policy. This
policy will take effect for all agencies
beginning with the 2009 NTD Report
Year. Any transit provider unable to
comply with this policy for 2009 may
request a waiver for up to one year from
FTA through the efile functionality of
the NTD Online Reporting System.
Transit providers should report all
demand response services provided to
individuals as public transportation
services, regardless of whether the trip
was sponsored in whole or in part by a
third party, except for those services
that are defined as charter service under
FTA’s recently revised charter rule (49
CFR Part 604, 73 FR 2326, January 14,
2008). Service that meets the definition
of charter service must be reported on
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
a quarterly basis to the charter
registration Web site, as required by the
charter rule, and data for these trips
should not be reported as revenue
service to the NTD.
Charter service is defined, in part, as
‘‘transportation provided * * * at the
request of a third party for the exclusive
use of a bus or van at a negotiated
price,’’ with the caveat that ‘‘charter
service * * * does not include demand
response service to individuals.’’ Transit
providers reporting to the NTD may
distinguish their demand response
services, particularly their sponsored
demand response service, from charter
service by a number of factors:
(1) Charter service is exclusive,
whereas demand response service is
shared-ride. If the transit provider may
mix passengers from a trip sponsor with
other demand response passengers on
the same trip, then the trip is sharedride service, and service data for that
trip should be reported to the NTD as
public transportation.
(2) Charter service is service to a
group, whereas demand response
service is service to individuals. Service
to individuals can be identified by a
vehicle trip that includes multiple
origins, multiple destinations, or both,
even when the clients have exclusive
use of the vehicle. Some demand
response sponsored trips carried out as
part of a Coordinated Human Services
Transportation Plan, such as trips for
Head Start, assisted living centers, or
sheltered workshops, may be provided
on an exclusive basis, but are provided
to service multiple origins to a single
destination, a single origin to multiple
destinations, or even multiple origins to
multiple destinations. Transit providers
should report service data for these trips
to the NTD as public transportation.
(3) Charter service is for a specific
event or function, whereas demand
response service is regular and
continuing. Some demand response
sponsored trips carried out as part of a
Coordinated Human Services
Transportation Plan may be exclusive,
and may be for a group from a single
origin to a single destination, but may
occur on a frequently reoccurring basis,
such as daily, weekly, biweekly, or
monthly. Transit providers should
report service data for these trips to the
NTD as public transportation.
(4) Demand response service may also
include certain trips that are exclusive,
for a group, from a single origin to a
single destination, and that reoccur on
a less-frequent basis than once per
month, so long as these trips are
arranged and operated under the same
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
terms and conditions as the demand
response system for individuals. These
terms and conditions include advance
notice requirements, service windows
for pick-up and drop-off, and price.
Service carried out by the demand
response units of transit providers that
are exclusive, for a group, from a single
origin to a single destination, for a
single event, and not under the usual
terms and conditions of the demand
response system for individuals should
be considered to be charter service.
Transit providers should report these
services to the charter registration Web
site. The following diagram provides a
visual representation of this guidance.
Transit providers reporting to the
NTD must specifically exclude from
their reports on revenue service any
service that meets the definition of
‘‘charter service’’ under the charter rule,
and thus, must be reported to the
charter registration Web site. This
exclusion includes charter service
legally provided to a Qualified Human
Services Organization (QHSO), as
provided for by the charter rule.
Transit providers reporting to the
NTD must report their regular unlinked
passenger trips and their sponsored
unlinked passenger trips separately for
demand response service, but not for
any other modes of service. Regular
unlinked passenger trips would refer to
those demand response trips that are
arranged and paid for by individuals,
even when those individuals pay the
fare with user-side subsidies, such as
coupons or passes provided a QHSO.
Regular unlinked passenger trips would
include all demand response trips
provided pursuant to the requirements
of the Americans with Disabilities Act
of 1990. Sponsored unlinked passenger
trips would include all trips where the
transit provider is directly reimbursed
in whole or in part by some third party
that has helped arrange for the trips.
This distinction would make reporting
of these services for urbanized area
transit providers consistent with the
reporting of these services for transit
providers in rural areas to the Rural
NTD. Since this proposal is being
announced late in the 2008 Report Year,
FTA will grant a waiver from reporting
separately regular and sponsored
unlinked passenger trips for the 2008
Report Year to any NTD Reporter that
requests such a waiver.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 20th day of
February 2009.
Matthew Welbes,
Acting Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 41 / Wednesday, March 4, 2009 / Notices
9473
[FR Doc. E9–4634 Filed 3–3–09; 8:45 am]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Mar 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\04MRN1.SGM
04MRN1
EN04MR09.021
BILLING CODE 4910–57–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 4, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9471-9473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
[Docket No: FTA-2008-0009]
National Transit Database: Policy on Reporting of Coordinated
Human Services Transportation Data
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Final Policy on Reporting of Coordinated Human
Services Transportation Data to the National Transit Database.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the Federal Transit Administration's
(FTA) policy on the reporting of coordinated human services
transportation data to the National Transit Database (NTD). On August
12, 2008, FTA proposed a new policy clarifying how transit providers
reporting to the NTD may include sponsored trips in their reports. FTA
received two comments on the proposed policy and is now formally
adopting the new policy.
DATES: Effective Date: March 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For program issues, John D. Giorgis,
Office of Budget and Policy, (202) 366-5430 (telephone); (202) 366-7989
(fax); or john.giorgis@dot.gov (e-mail). For legal issues, Richard
Wong, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-0675 (telephone); (202)
366-3809 (fax); or richard.wong@dot.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Transit Database (NTD) was established by Congress
``to help meet the needs of * * * the public for information on which
to base public transportation service planning * * *'' (49 U.S.C.
5335). To support this goal, recipients or beneficiaries of Urbanized
Area Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. 5307) or Other Than Urbanized Area
Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. 5311) are required to report to the NTD. Some
other providers of transit service in urbanized areas report
voluntarily to the NTD for purposes of benefitting their local
urbanized area in the urbanized area apportionments. Currently, over
650 transit providers in urbanized areas and over 60 State,
Territorial, and Tribal Departments of Transportation representing over
1,300 transit providers in rural areas report to the NTD through an
Internet-based reporting system. Each year, performance data from the
urbanized area submissions are used to apportion over $6 billion of FTA
funds under the Urbanized Area Formula Grants and Fixed-Guideway
Modernization Grants (49 U.S.C. 5309(b)(2)) Programs. These data are
also used in the annual National Transit Summaries and Trends report,
the biennial Conditions and Performance Report to Congress, in meeting
FTA's obligations under the Government Performance and Results Act, and
in public reports available on https://www.ntdprogram.gov.
For many years, it has been FTA's policy to require urbanized area
transit providers reporting demand response service to the NTD to
exclude from their reports service data for certain sponsored trips.
These trips were typically arranged and paid for by a third party for a
specific group of clients (such as participants in programs like
Medicaid, Head Start, sheltered workshops, or assisted living centers),
and these sponsored trips were often not open to the general public at
large. Excluding data for these trips from the NTD also excluded them
from the calculation of the apportionment of formula grants for
urbanized areas. In light of FTA's policies and guidance on Coordinated
Human Services Transportation, FTA proposed to clarify this policy for
the 2008 NTD Report Year to specify that transit providers are to
report data for all of their demand response service as public
transportation, except for those services that are defined as charter
service under FTA's recently revised charter rule (49 CFR 604, 73 FR
2326, January 14, 2008). FTA also proposed to require transit agencies
in urbanized areas to separately report their ``regular unlinked
passenger trips'' and their ``sponsored demand response unlinked
passenger trips'' for demand response service.
II. Comments and FTA Response to Comments
On August 12, 2008, FTA published a notice in the Federal Register
(73 FR 47641) inviting comments on this proposed policy on reporting
coordinated human services transportation data to the NTD. FTA received
two comments on the proposed change.
One commenter supported the proposed policy. A second commenter
objected to this policy on the grounds that the policy would impose NTD
reporting requirements on human services transportation providers that
are coordinated through a brokerage operated by a reporting transit
provider, and that the burdensome nature of the NTD reporting
requirements on these small-scale human service transportation
providers would result in a reduction in service from these providers.
The commenter noted that almost all of the human services
transportation providers coordinated through the brokerage received
very little Federal funding, and that this Federal funding was usually
not through the Section 5307 Program. The commenter also noted that
many of the required NTD reporting elements are not currently collected
at all, and the ridership metrics that are collected are not compliant
with FTA Circular 2710.1A.
Response: FTA clarifies that this policy only applies to what trips
a transit provider reports to the NTD, but does not extend NTD
reporting requirements to any other transit provider. The NTD requires
a transit provider to report all transit trips provided using its own
directly-operated equipment or through its own subcontractors.
Coordinating a trip through a brokerage does not create a subcontractor
relationship with the other human service transportation providers
participating in a brokerage. Thus, such trips should not be reported
to the NTD by a transit provider operating a brokerage. The only trips
from the brokerage that the transit provider should report to the NTD
are those referred to itself and carried out using its own directly-
operated equipment or using its purchased transportation
subcontractors.
[[Page 9472]]
If a transit provider wishes to benefit from the service data
generated by trips coordinated through a brokerage, it may do so by
requesting a separate NTD Identification Number (NTD ID) for making a
consolidated report on behalf of the participants in the brokerage. The
transit provider would then be responsible for ensuring that this
consolidated report is fully in compliance with all NTD reporting
requirements found in the Reporting Manuals and with the Uniform System
of Accounts.
FTA also wishes to clarify that it is not necessary for the
ridership metrics of unlinked passenger trips (UPT) and passenger miles
traveled (PMT) reported to the NTD to be collected as described in FTA
Circular 2710.A. This Circular delineates requirements for reporting
UPT and PMT data through statistical sampling when 100% counts of UPT
and PMT are either unavailable or unreliable. Transit providers should
report 100% counts of UPT and PMT to the NTD whenever they are
available and reliable, and should not report this data to the NTD
through statistical sampling in these cases. Almost all demand response
systems keep records of their UPT sufficient to report a 100% count.
Most demand response systems also record origins and destinations of
their passengers, which may be used to generate a 100% count of PMT,
and so avoid statistical sampling.
III. Final Policy
This policy shall take effect for the 2008 NTD Report Year, so that
any transit provider wishing to take advantage of this policy for the
2008 NTD Report Year may do so. Since many transit providers have
already begun completing their 2008 NTD Reports, however, FTA will also
accept any reports from the 2008 NTD Report Year made under the old
policy. This policy will take effect for all agencies beginning with
the 2009 NTD Report Year. Any transit provider unable to comply with
this policy for 2009 may request a waiver for up to one year from FTA
through the efile functionality of the NTD Online Reporting System.
Transit providers should report all demand response services
provided to individuals as public transportation services, regardless
of whether the trip was sponsored in whole or in part by a third party,
except for those services that are defined as charter service under
FTA's recently revised charter rule (49 CFR Part 604, 73 FR 2326,
January 14, 2008). Service that meets the definition of charter service
must be reported on a quarterly basis to the charter registration Web
site, as required by the charter rule, and data for these trips should
not be reported as revenue service to the NTD.
Charter service is defined, in part, as ``transportation provided *
* * at the request of a third party for the exclusive use of a bus or
van at a negotiated price,'' with the caveat that ``charter service * *
* does not include demand response service to individuals.'' Transit
providers reporting to the NTD may distinguish their demand response
services, particularly their sponsored demand response service, from
charter service by a number of factors:
(1) Charter service is exclusive, whereas demand response service
is shared-ride. If the transit provider may mix passengers from a trip
sponsor with other demand response passengers on the same trip, then
the trip is shared-ride service, and service data for that trip should
be reported to the NTD as public transportation.
(2) Charter service is service to a group, whereas demand response
service is service to individuals. Service to individuals can be
identified by a vehicle trip that includes multiple origins, multiple
destinations, or both, even when the clients have exclusive use of the
vehicle. Some demand response sponsored trips carried out as part of a
Coordinated Human Services Transportation Plan, such as trips for Head
Start, assisted living centers, or sheltered workshops, may be provided
on an exclusive basis, but are provided to service multiple origins to
a single destination, a single origin to multiple destinations, or even
multiple origins to multiple destinations. Transit providers should
report service data for these trips to the NTD as public
transportation.
(3) Charter service is for a specific event or function, whereas
demand response service is regular and continuing. Some demand response
sponsored trips carried out as part of a Coordinated Human Services
Transportation Plan may be exclusive, and may be for a group from a
single origin to a single destination, but may occur on a frequently
reoccurring basis, such as daily, weekly, biweekly, or monthly. Transit
providers should report service data for these trips to the NTD as
public transportation.
(4) Demand response service may also include certain trips that are
exclusive, for a group, from a single origin to a single destination,
and that reoccur on a less-frequent basis than once per month, so long
as these trips are arranged and operated under the same terms and
conditions as the demand response system for individuals. These terms
and conditions include advance notice requirements, service windows for
pick-up and drop-off, and price.
Service carried out by the demand response units of transit
providers that are exclusive, for a group, from a single origin to a
single destination, for a single event, and not under the usual terms
and conditions of the demand response system for individuals should be
considered to be charter service. Transit providers should report these
services to the charter registration Web site. The following diagram
provides a visual representation of this guidance.
Transit providers reporting to the NTD must specifically exclude
from their reports on revenue service any service that meets the
definition of ``charter service'' under the charter rule, and thus,
must be reported to the charter registration Web site. This exclusion
includes charter service legally provided to a Qualified Human Services
Organization (QHSO), as provided for by the charter rule.
Transit providers reporting to the NTD must report their regular
unlinked passenger trips and their sponsored unlinked passenger trips
separately for demand response service, but not for any other modes of
service. Regular unlinked passenger trips would refer to those demand
response trips that are arranged and paid for by individuals, even when
those individuals pay the fare with user-side subsidies, such as
coupons or passes provided a QHSO. Regular unlinked passenger trips
would include all demand response trips provided pursuant to the
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Sponsored
unlinked passenger trips would include all trips where the transit
provider is directly reimbursed in whole or in part by some third party
that has helped arrange for the trips. This distinction would make
reporting of these services for urbanized area transit providers
consistent with the reporting of these services for transit providers
in rural areas to the Rural NTD. Since this proposal is being announced
late in the 2008 Report Year, FTA will grant a waiver from reporting
separately regular and sponsored unlinked passenger trips for the 2008
Report Year to any NTD Reporter that requests such a waiver.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 20th day of February 2009.
Matthew Welbes,
Acting Administrator.
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P
[[Page 9473]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04MR09.021
[FR Doc. E9-4634 Filed 3-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-C