Assessments, 9338-9341 [E9-4585]
Download as PDF
9338
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
12 CFR Part 327
8967; and Christopher Bellotto, Counsel,
Legal Division, (202) 898–3801 or
Sheikha Kapoor, Senior Attorney, Legal
Division, (202) 898–3960.
RIN 3064–AD35
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Assessments
I. Background
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for
comment.
Recent and anticipated failures of
FDIC-insured institutions resulting from
deterioration in banking and economic
conditions have significantly increased
losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund
(the fund or the DIF). The reserve ratio
of the DIF declined from 1.19 percent as
of March 31, 2008, to 1.01 percent as of
June 30, 0.76 percent as of September
30, and 0.40 percent (preliminary) as of
December 31. Twenty-five institutions
failed in 2008, and the FDIC projects a
substantially higher rate of institution
failures in the next few years, leading to
a further decline in the reserve ratio.
Because the fund reserve ratio fell below
1.15 percent as of June 30, 2008, and
was expected to remain below 1.15
percent, the Reform Act required the
FDIC to establish and implement a
Restoration Plan that would restore the
reserve ratio to at least 1.15 percent
within five years, absent extraordinary
circumstances.1
On October 7, 2008, the FDIC
established a Restoration Plan for the
DIF. The Restoration Plan called for the
FDIC to set assessment rates such that
the reserve ratio would return to 1.15
percent within five years. The plan also
required the FDIC to update its loss and
income projections for the fund and, if
needed to ensure that the fund reserve
ratio reaches 1.15 percent within five
years, increase assessment rates.
Simultaneously with the adoption of
this interim rule, the FDIC has amended
the Restoration Plan and extended the
time within which the reserve ratio
must be returned to 1.15 percent to 7
years due to extraordinary
circumstances. Also, again
simultaneously with the adoption of
this interim rule, the FDIC has adopted
a final rule (the assessments final rule)
that, among other things, sets initial
base assessment rates at 12 to 45 basis
points.
However, given the FDIC’s estimated
losses from projected institution
failures, the assessment rates adopted in
the final rule are not sufficient to return
the fund reserve ratio to 1.15 percent
within 7 years and are unlikely to
prevent the DIF fund balance and
reserve ratio from falling to near zero or
becoming negative this year.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES2
SUMMARY: The FDIC is adopting an
interim rule to impose a 20 basis point
emergency special assessment under 12
U.S.C. 1817(b)(5) on June 30, 2009. The
assessment will be collected on
September 30, 2009. The interim rule
also provides that, after June 30, 2009,
if the reserve ratio of the Deposit
Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a
level that the Board believes would
adversely affect public confidence or to
a level which shall be close to zero or
negative at the end of a calendar quarter,
an emergency special assessment of up
to 10 basis points may be imposed by
a vote of the Board on all insured
depository institutions based on each
institution’s assessment base calculated
pursuant to 12 CFR 327.5 for the
corresponding assessment period. The
FDIC seeks comment on the interim
rule.
DATES: Effective April 1, 2009.
Comments must be received on or
before April 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN number, by any of the
following methods:
• Agency Web Site: http://www.fdic.
gov/regulations/laws/federal/
propose.html. Follow instructions for
submitting comments on the Agency
Web Site.
• E-mail: Comments@FDIC.gov.
Include the RIN number in the subject
line of the message.
• Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive
Secretary, Attention: Comments, Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20429
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard
station at the rear of the 550 17th Street
Building (located on F Street) on
business days between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and RIN
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change
to http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/propose.html including any
personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Munsell W. St. Clair, Chief, Banking and
Regulatory Policy Section, Division of
Insurance and Research, (202) 898–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Mar 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
1 Section 7(b)(3)(E) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(3)(E).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
II. Emergency Special Assessment
The FDIC believes that it is important
that the fund not decline to a level that
could undermine public confidence in
federal deposit insurance. Even though
the FDIC has significant authority to
borrow from the Treasury to cover
losses, a fund balance and reserve ratio
that are near zero or negative could
create public confusion about the FDIC’s
ability to move quickly to resolve
problem institutions and protect insured
depositors. The FDIC views the
Treasury line of credit as available to
cover unforeseen losses, not as a source
of financing projected losses.
The FDIC projects that the reserve
ratio will fall to close to zero or become
negative in 2009 unless the FDIC
receives more revenue than regular
quarterly assessments will produce,
given the rates adopted in the final rule
on assessments. Therefore, the FDIC
will impose an emergency special
assessment equal to 20 basis points of
an institution’s assessment base on June
30, 2009.2 The special assessment will
be collected on September 30, 2009, at
the same time that the risk-based
assessments for the second quarter of
2009 are collected. The assessment base
for the special assessment shall be the
same as the assessment base for the
second quarter risk-based assessment.
The FDIC has extended the period of
the Restoration Plan to seven years due
to the extraordinary circumstances
facing the banking industry—including
the severe problems in the financial
markets and the prospects of a lengthy
recession. If the Restoration Plan period
remained at its original five years, the
FDIC estimates that initial assessment
rates would have had to range from 20
to 45 basis points, compared to the
actual initial assessment rates adopted
in the assessments final rule, which
range from 12 to 45 basis points.
A 20 basis point special assessment
rate should increase the reserve ratio by
approximately 32 basis points.
2 12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(5) provides: Emergency
special assessments.—In addition to the other
assessments imposed on insured depository
institutions under this subsection, the Corporation
may impose 1 or more special assessments on
insured depository institutions in an amount
determined by the Corporation if the amount of any
such assessment is necessary—
(A) to provide sufficient assessment income to
repay amounts borrowed from the Secretary of the
Treasury under [12 U.S.C. 1824(a)] in accordance
with the repayment schedule in effect under [12
U.S.C. 1824(c)] during the period with respect to
which such assessment is imposed;
(B) to provide sufficient assessment income to
repay obligations issued to and other amounts
borrowed from insured depository institutions
under [12 U.S.C. 1824(d)]; or
(C) for any other purpose that the Corporation
may deem necessary.
E:\FR\FM\03MRR2.SGM
03MRR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
According to the FDIC’s projections, the
20 basis point special assessment
combined with the rates adopted in the
final assessments rule would return the
reserve ratio to 1.15 percent by the end
of 2015, consistent with the amended
seven-year Restoration Plan period.
As part of the Restoration Plan, the
FDIC has the authority to restrict credit
use while the plan is in effect, providing
that institutions may still apply credits
against their assessments equal to the
lesser of their assessment or 3 basis
points.3 The FDIC has decided not to
restrict credit use in the Restoration
Plan. The FDIC projects that the amount
of credits remaining at the time that the
special assessment is imposed will be
very small and that their use will have
very little effect on the assessment
revenue necessary to meet the
requirements of the plan.4
Effect on Capital and Earnings
The FDIC has analyzed the effect of a
20 basis point special assessment on the
capital and earnings of insured
institutions. For this analysis, it relied
on the projected range of industry
earnings in 2009 described in Appendix
2 of the preamble to the final rule on
assessments. Given the assumptions in
the analysis, for the industry as a whole,
the special assessment in 2009 would
result in year-end 2009 capital that
would be approximately 0.7 percent
lower than in the absence of a special
assessment. Based on the range of
projected industry earnings, a 20 basis
point special assessment would cause 9
to 13 institutions (with $3 billion to $5
billion in aggregate assets) whose
equity-to-assets ratio would have
exceeded 4 percent in the absence of
such an assessment to fall below that
percentage and 3 to 4 institutions (with
about $1 billion in aggregate assets) to
fall below 2 percent.
For profitable institutions, the special
assessment in 2009 would result in pretax income that would be between 10
percent and 13 percent lower than if the
FDIC did not charge such the special
assessment. For unprofitable
institutions, pre-tax losses would
increase by an average of between 3
percent and 6 percent.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES2
III. Further Special Assessments
The FDIC recognizes that there is
considerable uncertainty about its
projections for losses and insured
deposit growth, and, therefore, of future
3 Section 7(b)(3)(E)(iv) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(3)(E)(iv)).
4 For 2009 and 2010, credits may not offset more
than 90 percent of an institution’s assessment.
Section 7(e)(3)(D)(ii) of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(e)(3)(D)(ii)).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Mar 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
fund reserve ratios. To further ensure
that the fund reserve ratio does not
decline to a level that could undermine
public confidence in federal deposit
insurance, the FDIC may impose an
emergency special assessment of up to
10 basis points of an institution’s
assessment base whenever, after June
30, 2009, the reserve ratio of the Deposit
Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a
level that the Board believes would
adversely affect public confidence or to
a level which shall be close to zero or
negative at the end of a calendar quarter.
Any such special assessment will be
imposed on the last day of a quarter
(March 31, June 30, September 30 or
December 31) and will be collected
approximately three months later, at the
same time that risk-based assessments
are collected. The earliest possible date
for such a special assessment is
September 30, 2009 (which would be
collected December 30, 2009).
The assessment base for any special
assessment shall be the base for the riskbased assessment for the quarter ending
the date the special assessment is
imposed. Thus, for example, the
assessment base for a special assessment
imposed on September 30, 2009, would
be the assessment base for the quarterly
risk-based assessment for the third
quarter of 2009 (collected December 30,
2009).
Near the end of each quarter, the FDIC
will estimate the reserve ratio for that
quarter from available data on, or
estimates of, insurance fund assessment
income, investment income, operating
expenses, other revenue and expenses,
and loss provisions (including
provisions for anticipated failures).
Because no data on estimated insured
deposits will be available until after the
quarter-end, the FDIC will assume that
estimated insured deposits will increase
during the quarter at the average
quarterly rate over the previous four
quarters.
If the FDIC estimates that the reserve
ratio will fall to a level that the Board
believes would adversely affect public
confidence or to a level close to zero or
negative at the end of a calendar quarter,
and the Board decides to impose an
emergency special assessment of up to
10 basis points, the FDIC will announce
the imposition and rate of the special
assessment no later than the last day of
the quarter. As soon as practicable after
any such announcement, the FDIC will
have a notice published in the Federal
Register of the imposition of the special
assessment.
Thus, for example, if in late
September 2009, the FDIC estimates that
the reserve ratio on September 30, 2009,
will fall to zero, and the FDIC’s Board
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9339
votes to impose a special assessment of
up to 10 basis points, the FDIC will
announce no later than September 30
that it is imposing a special assessment
on September 30, 2009, and the rate of
the assessment, and will collect the
special assessment, along with the usual
quarterly deposit insurance assessment,
on December 30, 2009.
The FDIC currently projects that the
combination of regular quarterly
assessments and the 20 basis point
special assessment will prevent the fund
reserve ratio from falling to a level that
that the Board believes would adversely
affect public confidence or to a level
close to zero or negative during the
period of the Restoration Plan. For this
reason, the FDIC does not expect to
impose a special assessment of up to 10
basis points. However, the FDIC will not
make its estimates of quarter-end
reserve ratios for purposes of any such
special assessment, nor will the Board
determine whether to impose such a
special assessment, until shortly before
the end of each quarter, in order to take
advantage of the most recently available
data.
IV. Requests for Comments
The FDIC seeks comment on every
aspect of this rulemaking. In particular,
the FDIC seeks comment on the issues
set out below. The FDIC asks that
commenters include reasons for their
positions.
1. Should the June 30, 2009 special
assessment be at a rate other than 20
basis points?
2. Should there be a maximum rate
that the combination of an institution’s
regular quarterly assessment rate and a
special assessment could not exceed?
For example, an institution in Risk
Category IV could possibly be charged a
regular quarterly assessment at the
annual rate of 77.5 basis points
beginning in the second quarter of 2009.
A 20 basis point special assessment
would effectively increase the
maximum possible annual rate to nearly
100 basis points. Should the rate be
capped at a smaller amount?
3. Should weaker institutions be
exempted, in whole or in part, from the
special assessment? For example,
should institutions with CAMELS
ratings of 4 or 5 be exempted? Should
adequately or undercapitalized
institutions be exempted? Should
institutions that would become
undercapitalized (or critically
undercapitalized) as the result of the
special assessment be exempted?
4. Should special assessments be
assessed on assets or some other
measure, rather than the regular riskbased assessment base?
E:\FR\FM\03MRR2.SGM
03MRR2
9340
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
5. Should there be special
assessments of up to10 basis points?
Should some other rate be used? For
example, should the rate be the rate
needed to maintain the fund reserve
ratio at particular value for the reserve
ratio?
6. Should FDIC assessments,
including emergency special
assessments, take into account the
assistance being provided to
systemically important institutions?
V. Effective Date
This interim rule will take effect April
1, 2009.
VI. Regulatory Analysis and Procedure
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES2
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA),
notice and comment are not required
prior to the issuance of a final rule if an
agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. The FDIC finds
good cause to adopt this interim rule
without prior notice and comment.
The FDIC believes that it is important
that the fund not decline to a level that
could undermine public confidence in
federal deposit insurance. A fund
balance and reserve ratio that are near
zero or negative could create public
confusion about the FDIC’s ability to
move quickly to resolve problem
institutions and protect insured
depositors. Without additional revenue
other than quarterly risk-based
assessments based on the rates adopted
in the Final Rule, the FDIC projects the
reserve ratio will fall close to zero or
become negative in 2009. Therefore, it is
important for public confidence to have
the interim rule in place quickly.
Nevertheless, the FDIC desires to have
the benefit of public comment and thus
invites interested parties to submit
comments during a 30-day comment
period. The 30-day comment period will
allow the FDIC to receive comments in
a timely manner, given that the interim
rule will be on April 1, 2009. The FDIC
will revise the interim rule, if
appropriate, in light of the comments
received.
B. Solicitation of Comments on Use of
Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-LeachBliley Act, Public Law 106–102, 113
Stat. 1338, 1471 (Nov. 12, 1999),
requires the federal banking agencies to
use plain language in all proposed and
final rules published after January 1,
2000. The FDIC invites your comments
on how to make this proposal easier to
understand. For example:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Mar 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
• Has the FDIC organized the material
to suit your needs? If not, how could
this material be better organized?
• Are the requirements in the
regulation clearly stated? If not, how
could the regulation be more clearly
stated?
• Does the regulation contain
language or jargon that is not clear? If
so, which language requires
clarification?
• Would a different format (grouping
and order of sections, use of headings,
paragraphing) make the regulation
easier to understand? If so, what
changes to the format would make the
regulation easier to understand?
• What else could the FDIC do to
make the regulation easier to
understand?
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
requires that each federal agency either
certify that a final rule would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities or
prepare an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis of the proposal and publish the
analysis for comment.5 Certain types of
rules, such as rules of particular
applicability relating to rates or
corporate or financial structures, or
practices relating to such rates or
structures, are expressly excluded from
the definition of ‘‘rule’’ for purposes of
the RFA.6 The interim rule relates
directly to the rates imposed on insured
depository institutions for deposit
insurance. In addition, this interim rule
does not involve the issuance of a notice
of proposed rulemaking. For these
reasons, the requirements of the RFA do
not apply. Nonetheless, the FDIC is
voluntarily undertaking a regulatory
flexibility analysis and is seeking
comment on it.
As of December 31, 2008, of the 8,305
insured commercial banks and savings
institutions, 4,567 were small insured
depository institutions as that term is
defined for purposes of the RFA (i.e.,
those with $165 million or less in
assets).
The FDIC’s total assessment needs are
driven by the statutory requirement that
the FDIC adopt a Restoration Plan that
provides that the fund reserve ratio
reach at least 1.15 percent within five
years absent extraordinary
circumstances and by the FDIC’s
aggregate insurance losses, expenses,
investment income, and insured deposit
growth, among other factors. Under the
interim rule, each institution would be
subject to a special assessment at a
5 See
65
PO 00000
5 U.S.C. 603, 604 and 605.
U.S.C. 601.
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
uniform rate to help meet FDIC
assessment revenue needs. Apart from
the uniform special assessment on all
institutions to help meet the FDIC’s total
revenue needs, the interim rule makes
no other changes in rates for any
insured institution, including small
insured depository institutions. In
effect, the interim rule would uniformly
increase each institution’s assessment
rate by 20 basis points for one
assessment collection (including each
small institution’s assessment rate, as a
small institution is defined for RFA
purposes), and would not alter the
present distribution of assessment
rates.7 The interim rule does not
directly impose any ‘‘reporting’’ or
‘‘recordkeeping’’ requirements within
the meaning of the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The compliance
requirements for the interim rule would
not exceed existing compliance
requirements for the present system of
FDIC deposit insurance assessments,
which, in any event, are governed by
separate regulations. The FDIC is
unaware of any duplicative, overlapping
or conflicting federal rules.
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that the interim rule is
not a ‘‘major rule’’ within the meaning
of the relevant sections of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of
1996 (SBREFA) Public Law 110–28
(1996). As required by law, the FDIC
will file the appropriate reports with
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office so that the interim
rule may be reviewed.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
No collections of information
pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) are
contained in the interim rule.
F. The Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999—
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
The FDIC has determined that the
interim rule will not affect family wellbeing within the meaning of section 654
of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act,
enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681).
7 Additional special assessments of up to 10 basis
points could uniformly increase each institution’s
assessment rate up to 10 basis points for additional
assessment collections.
E:\FR\FM\03MRR2.SGM
03MRR2
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 3, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 327
Bank deposit insurance, Banks,
banking, Savings associations.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the FDIC proposes to amend
chapter III of title 12 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 327—ASSESSMENTS
1. The authority citation for part 327
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1441, 1813, 1815,
1817–1819, 1821; Sec. 2101–2109, Pub. L.
109–171, 120 Stat. 9–21, and Sec. 3, Pub. L.
109–173, 119 Stat. 3605.
2. In part 327 add new § 327.15 to
Subpart A to read as follows:
■
§ 327.11
Emergency special assessments.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with RULES2
(a) Emergency special assessment
imposed on June 30, 2009. On June 30,
2009, the FDIC shall impose an
emergency special assessment of 20
basis points on each insured depository
institution based on the institution’s
assessment base calculated pursuant to
§ 327.5 for the second assessment period
of 2009.
(b) Emergency special assessments
after June 30, 2009. After June 30, 2009,
if the reserve ratio of the Deposit
Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a
level that that the Board believes would
adversely affect public confidence or to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:03 Mar 02, 2009
Jkt 217001
a level which shall be close to zero or
negative at the end of a calendar quarter,
an emergency special assessment of up
to 10 basis points may be imposed by
a vote of the Board on all insured
depository institutions based on each
institution’s assessment base calculated
pursuant to § 327.5 for the
corresponding assessment period.
(1) Estimation process. For purposes
of any emergency special assessment
under this paragraph (b), the FDIC shall
estimate the reserve ratio of the Deposit
Insurance Fund for the applicable
calendar quarter end from available data
on, or estimates of, insurance fund
assessment income, investment income,
operating expenses, other revenue and
expenses, and loss provisions, including
provisions for anticipated failures. The
FDIC will assume that estimated insured
deposits will increase during the quarter
at the average quarterly rate over the
previous four quarters.
(2) Imposition and announcement of
emergency special assessments. Any
emergency special assessment under
this paragraph (b) shall be on the last
day of a calendar quarter and shall be
announced by the end of such quarter.
As soon as practicable after
announcement, the FDIC will have a
notice published in the Federal Register
of the emergency special assessment.
(c) Invoicing of any emergency special
assessments. The FDIC shall advise each
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
9341
insured depository institution of the
amount and calculation of any
emergency special assessment imposed
under paragraph (a) or (b) of this
section. This information shall be
provided at the same time as the
institution’s quarterly certified
statement invoice for the assessment
period in which the emergency special
assessment was imposed.
(d) Payment of any emergency special
assessment. Each insured depository
institution shall pay to the Corporation
any emergency special assessment
imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) of
this section in compliance with and
subject to the provisions of §§ 327.3,
327.6 and 327.7 of subpart A, and the
provisions of subpart B. The payment
date for any emergency special
assessment shall be the date provided in
§ 327.3(b)(2) for the institution’s
quarterly certified statement invoice for
the calendar quarter in which the
emergency special assessment was
imposed.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 27th day of
February, 2009.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–4585 Filed 3–2–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
E:\FR\FM\03MRR2.SGM
03MRR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 3, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9338-9341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4585]
[[Page 9337]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
12 CFR Part 327
Assessments; Interim Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 40 / Tuesday, March 3, 2009 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 9338]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
12 CFR Part 327
RIN 3064-AD35
Assessments
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FDIC is adopting an interim rule to impose a 20 basis
point emergency special assessment under 12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(5) on June
30, 2009. The assessment will be collected on September 30, 2009. The
interim rule also provides that, after June 30, 2009, if the reserve
ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a level
that the Board believes would adversely affect public confidence or to
a level which shall be close to zero or negative at the end of a
calendar quarter, an emergency special assessment of up to 10 basis
points may be imposed by a vote of the Board on all insured depository
institutions based on each institution's assessment base calculated
pursuant to 12 CFR 327.5 for the corresponding assessment period. The
FDIC seeks comment on the interim rule.
DATES: Effective April 1, 2009. Comments must be received on or before
April 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN number, by any of
the following methods:
Agency Web Site: http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/
federal/propose.html. Follow instructions for submitting comments on
the Agency Web Site.
E-mail: Comments@FDIC.gov. Include the RIN number in the
subject line of the message.
Mail: Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary, Attention:
Comments, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20429
Hand Delivery/Courier: Guard station at the rear of the
550 17th Street Building (located on F Street) on business days between
7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and RIN for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/
propose.html including any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Munsell W. St. Clair, Chief, Banking
and Regulatory Policy Section, Division of Insurance and Research,
(202) 898-8967; and Christopher Bellotto, Counsel, Legal Division,
(202) 898-3801 or Sheikha Kapoor, Senior Attorney, Legal Division,
(202) 898-3960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Recent and anticipated failures of FDIC-insured institutions
resulting from deterioration in banking and economic conditions have
significantly increased losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the fund
or the DIF). The reserve ratio of the DIF declined from 1.19 percent as
of March 31, 2008, to 1.01 percent as of June 30, 0.76 percent as of
September 30, and 0.40 percent (preliminary) as of December 31. Twenty-
five institutions failed in 2008, and the FDIC projects a substantially
higher rate of institution failures in the next few years, leading to a
further decline in the reserve ratio. Because the fund reserve ratio
fell below 1.15 percent as of June 30, 2008, and was expected to remain
below 1.15 percent, the Reform Act required the FDIC to establish and
implement a Restoration Plan that would restore the reserve ratio to at
least 1.15 percent within five years, absent extraordinary
circumstances.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Section 7(b)(3)(E) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12
U.S.C. 1817(b)(3)(E).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On October 7, 2008, the FDIC established a Restoration Plan for the
DIF. The Restoration Plan called for the FDIC to set assessment rates
such that the reserve ratio would return to 1.15 percent within five
years. The plan also required the FDIC to update its loss and income
projections for the fund and, if needed to ensure that the fund reserve
ratio reaches 1.15 percent within five years, increase assessment
rates.
Simultaneously with the adoption of this interim rule, the FDIC has
amended the Restoration Plan and extended the time within which the
reserve ratio must be returned to 1.15 percent to 7 years due to
extraordinary circumstances. Also, again simultaneously with the
adoption of this interim rule, the FDIC has adopted a final rule (the
assessments final rule) that, among other things, sets initial base
assessment rates at 12 to 45 basis points.
However, given the FDIC's estimated losses from projected
institution failures, the assessment rates adopted in the final rule
are not sufficient to return the fund reserve ratio to 1.15 percent
within 7 years and are unlikely to prevent the DIF fund balance and
reserve ratio from falling to near zero or becoming negative this year.
II. Emergency Special Assessment
The FDIC believes that it is important that the fund not decline to
a level that could undermine public confidence in federal deposit
insurance. Even though the FDIC has significant authority to borrow
from the Treasury to cover losses, a fund balance and reserve ratio
that are near zero or negative could create public confusion about the
FDIC's ability to move quickly to resolve problem institutions and
protect insured depositors. The FDIC views the Treasury line of credit
as available to cover unforeseen losses, not as a source of financing
projected losses.
The FDIC projects that the reserve ratio will fall to close to zero
or become negative in 2009 unless the FDIC receives more revenue than
regular quarterly assessments will produce, given the rates adopted in
the final rule on assessments. Therefore, the FDIC will impose an
emergency special assessment equal to 20 basis points of an
institution's assessment base on June 30, 2009.\2\ The special
assessment will be collected on September 30, 2009, at the same time
that the risk-based assessments for the second quarter of 2009 are
collected. The assessment base for the special assessment shall be the
same as the assessment base for the second quarter risk-based
assessment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(5) provides: Emergency special
assessments.--In addition to the other assessments imposed on
insured depository institutions under this subsection, the
Corporation may impose 1 or more special assessments on insured
depository institutions in an amount determined by the Corporation
if the amount of any such assessment is necessary--
(A) to provide sufficient assessment income to repay amounts
borrowed from the Secretary of the Treasury under [12 U.S.C.
1824(a)] in accordance with the repayment schedule in effect under
[12 U.S.C. 1824(c)] during the period with respect to which such
assessment is imposed;
(B) to provide sufficient assessment income to repay obligations
issued to and other amounts borrowed from insured depository
institutions under [12 U.S.C. 1824(d)]; or
(C) for any other purpose that the Corporation may deem
necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FDIC has extended the period of the Restoration Plan to seven
years due to the extraordinary circumstances facing the banking
industry--including the severe problems in the financial markets and
the prospects of a lengthy recession. If the Restoration Plan period
remained at its original five years, the FDIC estimates that initial
assessment rates would have had to range from 20 to 45 basis points,
compared to the actual initial assessment rates adopted in the
assessments final rule, which range from 12 to 45 basis points.
A 20 basis point special assessment rate should increase the
reserve ratio by approximately 32 basis points.
[[Page 9339]]
According to the FDIC's projections, the 20 basis point special
assessment combined with the rates adopted in the final assessments
rule would return the reserve ratio to 1.15 percent by the end of 2015,
consistent with the amended seven-year Restoration Plan period.
As part of the Restoration Plan, the FDIC has the authority to
restrict credit use while the plan is in effect, providing that
institutions may still apply credits against their assessments equal to
the lesser of their assessment or 3 basis points.\3\ The FDIC has
decided not to restrict credit use in the Restoration Plan. The FDIC
projects that the amount of credits remaining at the time that the
special assessment is imposed will be very small and that their use
will have very little effect on the assessment revenue necessary to
meet the requirements of the plan.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Section 7(b)(3)(E)(iv) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act
(12 U.S.C. 1817(b)(3)(E)(iv)).
\4\ For 2009 and 2010, credits may not offset more than 90
percent of an institution's assessment. Section 7(e)(3)(D)(ii) of
the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(e)(3)(D)(ii)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effect on Capital and Earnings
The FDIC has analyzed the effect of a 20 basis point special
assessment on the capital and earnings of insured institutions. For
this analysis, it relied on the projected range of industry earnings in
2009 described in Appendix 2 of the preamble to the final rule on
assessments. Given the assumptions in the analysis, for the industry as
a whole, the special assessment in 2009 would result in year-end 2009
capital that would be approximately 0.7 percent lower than in the
absence of a special assessment. Based on the range of projected
industry earnings, a 20 basis point special assessment would cause 9 to
13 institutions (with $3 billion to $5 billion in aggregate assets)
whose equity-to-assets ratio would have exceeded 4 percent in the
absence of such an assessment to fall below that percentage and 3 to 4
institutions (with about $1 billion in aggregate assets) to fall below
2 percent.
For profitable institutions, the special assessment in 2009 would
result in pre-tax income that would be between 10 percent and 13
percent lower than if the FDIC did not charge such the special
assessment. For unprofitable institutions, pre-tax losses would
increase by an average of between 3 percent and 6 percent.
III. Further Special Assessments
The FDIC recognizes that there is considerable uncertainty about
its projections for losses and insured deposit growth, and, therefore,
of future fund reserve ratios. To further ensure that the fund reserve
ratio does not decline to a level that could undermine public
confidence in federal deposit insurance, the FDIC may impose an
emergency special assessment of up to 10 basis points of an
institution's assessment base whenever, after June 30, 2009, the
reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund is estimated to fall to a
level that the Board believes would adversely affect public confidence
or to a level which shall be close to zero or negative at the end of a
calendar quarter. Any such special assessment will be imposed on the
last day of a quarter (March 31, June 30, September 30 or December 31)
and will be collected approximately three months later, at the same
time that risk-based assessments are collected. The earliest possible
date for such a special assessment is September 30, 2009 (which would
be collected December 30, 2009).
The assessment base for any special assessment shall be the base
for the risk-based assessment for the quarter ending the date the
special assessment is imposed. Thus, for example, the assessment base
for a special assessment imposed on September 30, 2009, would be the
assessment base for the quarterly risk-based assessment for the third
quarter of 2009 (collected December 30, 2009).
Near the end of each quarter, the FDIC will estimate the reserve
ratio for that quarter from available data on, or estimates of,
insurance fund assessment income, investment income, operating
expenses, other revenue and expenses, and loss provisions (including
provisions for anticipated failures). Because no data on estimated
insured deposits will be available until after the quarter-end, the
FDIC will assume that estimated insured deposits will increase during
the quarter at the average quarterly rate over the previous four
quarters.
If the FDIC estimates that the reserve ratio will fall to a level
that the Board believes would adversely affect public confidence or to
a level close to zero or negative at the end of a calendar quarter, and
the Board decides to impose an emergency special assessment of up to 10
basis points, the FDIC will announce the imposition and rate of the
special assessment no later than the last day of the quarter. As soon
as practicable after any such announcement, the FDIC will have a notice
published in the Federal Register of the imposition of the special
assessment.
Thus, for example, if in late September 2009, the FDIC estimates
that the reserve ratio on September 30, 2009, will fall to zero, and
the FDIC's Board votes to impose a special assessment of up to 10 basis
points, the FDIC will announce no later than September 30 that it is
imposing a special assessment on September 30, 2009, and the rate of
the assessment, and will collect the special assessment, along with the
usual quarterly deposit insurance assessment, on December 30, 2009.
The FDIC currently projects that the combination of regular
quarterly assessments and the 20 basis point special assessment will
prevent the fund reserve ratio from falling to a level that that the
Board believes would adversely affect public confidence or to a level
close to zero or negative during the period of the Restoration Plan.
For this reason, the FDIC does not expect to impose a special
assessment of up to 10 basis points. However, the FDIC will not make
its estimates of quarter-end reserve ratios for purposes of any such
special assessment, nor will the Board determine whether to impose such
a special assessment, until shortly before the end of each quarter, in
order to take advantage of the most recently available data.
IV. Requests for Comments
The FDIC seeks comment on every aspect of this rulemaking. In
particular, the FDIC seeks comment on the issues set out below. The
FDIC asks that commenters include reasons for their positions.
1. Should the June 30, 2009 special assessment be at a rate other
than 20 basis points?
2. Should there be a maximum rate that the combination of an
institution's regular quarterly assessment rate and a special
assessment could not exceed? For example, an institution in Risk
Category IV could possibly be charged a regular quarterly assessment at
the annual rate of 77.5 basis points beginning in the second quarter of
2009. A 20 basis point special assessment would effectively increase
the maximum possible annual rate to nearly 100 basis points. Should the
rate be capped at a smaller amount?
3. Should weaker institutions be exempted, in whole or in part,
from the special assessment? For example, should institutions with
CAMELS ratings of 4 or 5 be exempted? Should adequately or
undercapitalized institutions be exempted? Should institutions that
would become undercapitalized (or critically undercapitalized) as the
result of the special assessment be exempted?
4. Should special assessments be assessed on assets or some other
measure, rather than the regular risk-based assessment base?
[[Page 9340]]
5. Should there be special assessments of up to10 basis points?
Should some other rate be used? For example, should the rate be the
rate needed to maintain the fund reserve ratio at particular value for
the reserve ratio?
6. Should FDIC assessments, including emergency special
assessments, take into account the assistance being provided to
systemically important institutions?
V. Effective Date
This interim rule will take effect April 1, 2009.
VI. Regulatory Analysis and Procedure
A. Administrative Procedure Act
Pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA), notice and comment are not required prior to the issuance of a
final rule if an agency for good cause finds that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. The FDIC finds good cause to adopt this interim rule
without prior notice and comment.
The FDIC believes that it is important that the fund not decline to
a level that could undermine public confidence in federal deposit
insurance. A fund balance and reserve ratio that are near zero or
negative could create public confusion about the FDIC's ability to move
quickly to resolve problem institutions and protect insured depositors.
Without additional revenue other than quarterly risk-based assessments
based on the rates adopted in the Final Rule, the FDIC projects the
reserve ratio will fall close to zero or become negative in 2009.
Therefore, it is important for public confidence to have the interim
rule in place quickly. Nevertheless, the FDIC desires to have the
benefit of public comment and thus invites interested parties to submit
comments during a 30-day comment period. The 30-day comment period will
allow the FDIC to receive comments in a timely manner, given that the
interim rule will be on April 1, 2009. The FDIC will revise the interim
rule, if appropriate, in light of the comments received.
B. Solicitation of Comments on Use of Plain Language
Section 722 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Public Law 106-102, 113
Stat. 1338, 1471 (Nov. 12, 1999), requires the federal banking agencies
to use plain language in all proposed and final rules published after
January 1, 2000. The FDIC invites your comments on how to make this
proposal easier to understand. For example:
Has the FDIC organized the material to suit your needs? If
not, how could this material be better organized?
Are the requirements in the regulation clearly stated? If
not, how could the regulation be more clearly stated?
Does the regulation contain language or jargon that is not
clear? If so, which language requires clarification?
Would a different format (grouping and order of sections,
use of headings, paragraphing) make the regulation easier to
understand? If so, what changes to the format would make the regulation
easier to understand?
What else could the FDIC do to make the regulation easier
to understand?
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that each federal
agency either certify that a final rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities or prepare an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis of the proposal and publish the
analysis for comment.\5\ Certain types of rules, such as rules of
particular applicability relating to rates or corporate or financial
structures, or practices relating to such rates or structures, are
expressly excluded from the definition of ``rule'' for purposes of the
RFA.\6\ The interim rule relates directly to the rates imposed on
insured depository institutions for deposit insurance. In addition,
this interim rule does not involve the issuance of a notice of proposed
rulemaking. For these reasons, the requirements of the RFA do not
apply. Nonetheless, the FDIC is voluntarily undertaking a regulatory
flexibility analysis and is seeking comment on it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 5 U.S.C. 603, 604 and 605.
\6\ 5 U.S.C. 601.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of December 31, 2008, of the 8,305 insured commercial banks and
savings institutions, 4,567 were small insured depository institutions
as that term is defined for purposes of the RFA (i.e., those with $165
million or less in assets).
The FDIC's total assessment needs are driven by the statutory
requirement that the FDIC adopt a Restoration Plan that provides that
the fund reserve ratio reach at least 1.15 percent within five years
absent extraordinary circumstances and by the FDIC's aggregate
insurance losses, expenses, investment income, and insured deposit
growth, among other factors. Under the interim rule, each institution
would be subject to a special assessment at a uniform rate to help meet
FDIC assessment revenue needs. Apart from the uniform special
assessment on all institutions to help meet the FDIC's total revenue
needs, the interim rule makes no other changes in rates for any insured
institution, including small insured depository institutions. In
effect, the interim rule would uniformly increase each institution's
assessment rate by 20 basis points for one assessment collection
(including each small institution's assessment rate, as a small
institution is defined for RFA purposes), and would not alter the
present distribution of assessment rates.\7\ The interim rule does not
directly impose any ``reporting'' or ``recordkeeping'' requirements
within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The compliance
requirements for the interim rule would not exceed existing compliance
requirements for the present system of FDIC deposit insurance
assessments, which, in any event, are governed by separate regulations.
The FDIC is unaware of any duplicative, overlapping or conflicting
federal rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Additional special assessments of up to 10 basis points
could uniformly increase each institution's assessment rate up to 10
basis points for additional assessment collections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that the interim
rule is not a ``major rule'' within the meaning of the relevant
sections of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996
(SBREFA) Public Law 110-28 (1996). As required by law, the FDIC will
file the appropriate reports with Congress and the Government
Accountability Office so that the interim rule may be reviewed.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
No collections of information pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) are contained in the interim rule.
F. The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
The FDIC has determined that the interim rule will not affect
family well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999
(Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681).
[[Page 9341]]
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 327
Bank deposit insurance, Banks, banking, Savings associations.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the FDIC proposes to amend
chapter III of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 327--ASSESSMENTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 327 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1441, 1813, 1815, 1817-1819, 1821; Sec.
2101-2109, Pub. L. 109-171, 120 Stat. 9-21, and Sec. 3, Pub. L. 109-
173, 119 Stat. 3605.
0
2. In part 327 add new Sec. 327.15 to Subpart A to read as follows:
Sec. 327.11 Emergency special assessments.
(a) Emergency special assessment imposed on June 30, 2009. On June
30, 2009, the FDIC shall impose an emergency special assessment of 20
basis points on each insured depository institution based on the
institution's assessment base calculated pursuant to Sec. 327.5 for
the second assessment period of 2009.
(b) Emergency special assessments after June 30, 2009. After June
30, 2009, if the reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund is
estimated to fall to a level that that the Board believes would
adversely affect public confidence or to a level which shall be close
to zero or negative at the end of a calendar quarter, an emergency
special assessment of up to 10 basis points may be imposed by a vote of
the Board on all insured depository institutions based on each
institution's assessment base calculated pursuant to Sec. 327.5 for
the corresponding assessment period.
(1) Estimation process. For purposes of any emergency special
assessment under this paragraph (b), the FDIC shall estimate the
reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund for the applicable calendar
quarter end from available data on, or estimates of, insurance fund
assessment income, investment income, operating expenses, other revenue
and expenses, and loss provisions, including provisions for anticipated
failures. The FDIC will assume that estimated insured deposits will
increase during the quarter at the average quarterly rate over the
previous four quarters.
(2) Imposition and announcement of emergency special assessments.
Any emergency special assessment under this paragraph (b) shall be on
the last day of a calendar quarter and shall be announced by the end of
such quarter. As soon as practicable after announcement, the FDIC will
have a notice published in the Federal Register of the emergency
special assessment.
(c) Invoicing of any emergency special assessments. The FDIC shall
advise each insured depository institution of the amount and
calculation of any emergency special assessment imposed under paragraph
(a) or (b) of this section. This information shall be provided at the
same time as the institution's quarterly certified statement invoice
for the assessment period in which the emergency special assessment was
imposed.
(d) Payment of any emergency special assessment. Each insured
depository institution shall pay to the Corporation any emergency
special assessment imposed under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section
in compliance with and subject to the provisions of Sec. Sec. 327.3,
327.6 and 327.7 of subpart A, and the provisions of subpart B. The
payment date for any emergency special assessment shall be the date
provided in Sec. 327.3(b)(2) for the institution's quarterly certified
statement invoice for the calendar quarter in which the emergency
special assessment was imposed.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 27th day of February, 2009.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-4585 Filed 3-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P