Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish Fisheries; 2009 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications, 9072-9075 [E9-4284]

Agencies

• DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 39 (Monday, March 2, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9072-9075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4284]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 090206144-9186-01]
RIN 0648-AX49


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fisheries; 2009 Atlantic Bluefish Specifications

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS proposes 2009 specifications for the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery, including state-by-state commercial quotas, a recreational 
harvest limit, and recreational possession limits for Atlantic bluefish 
off the east coast of the United States. The intent of these 
specifications is to establish the allowable 2009 harvest levels and 
possession limits to attain the target fishing mortality rate (F), 
consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish Fishery Management Plan (FMP).

DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 5 p.m. eastern 
standard time, on March 17, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by 0648-AX49, by any one 
of the following methods:
     Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov,
     Fax: (978) 281-9135, Attn: Regional Administrator.
     Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, 
Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 
01930. Mark the outside of the envelope: ``Comments on 2009 Bluefish 
Specifications.''
    Instructions: All comments received are part of the public record 
and will generally be posted to https://www.regulations.gov without 
change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, 
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publicly 
accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or 
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
    NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachments to electronic 
comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or 
Adobe PDF file formats only.
    Copies of the specifications document, including the Environmental 
Assessment and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and 
other supporting documents for the specifications, are available from 
Daniel Furlong, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management 
Council, Room 2115, Federal Building, 300 South Street, Dover, DE 
19901-6790. The specifications document is also accessible via the 
Internet at https://www.nero.noaa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst, 
(978) 281-9273.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The regulations implementing the FMP are prepared by the Mid-
Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council) and appear at 50 CFR part 
648, subparts A and J. Regulations requiring annual specifications are 
found at Sec.  648.160. The management unit for bluefish (Pomatomus 
saltatrix) is U.S. waters of the western Atlantic Ocean.
    The FMP requires that the Council recommend, on an annual basis, 
total allowable landings (TAL) for the fishery, consisting of a 
commercial quota and recreational harvest limit (RHL). A research set 
aside (RSA) quota is deducted from the bluefish TAL (after any 
applicable transfer) in an amount proportional to the percentage of the 
overall TAL as allocated to the commercial and recreational sectors. 
The annual review process for bluefish requires that the Council's 
Bluefish Monitoring Committee (Monitoring Committee) and Scientific and 
Statistical Committee (SSC) review and make recommendations based on 
the best available data, including, but not limited to, commercial and 
recreational catch/landing statistics, current estimates of fishing 
mortality, stock abundance, discards for the recreational fishery, and 
juvenile recruitment. Based on the recommendations of the Monitoring 
Committee and SSC, the Council makes a recommendation to the Northeast 
Regional Administrator (RA). This FMP is a joint plan with the Atlantic 
States Marine Fisheries Commission (Commission); therefore, the 
Commission meets during the annual specification process to adopt 
complementary measures.
    The Council's recommendations must include supporting documentation 
concerning the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the 
recommendations. NMFS is responsible for reviewing these 
recommendations to assure they achieve the FMP objectives, and may 
modify them if they do not. NMFS then publishes proposed specifications 
in the Federal Register. After considering public comment, NMFS will 
publish final specifications in the Federal Register.
    In July 2008, the Monitoring Committee and SSC met to discuss the 
updated estimates of bluefish stock biomass and project fishery yields 
for 2009. In August 2008, the Council approved the SSC and Monitoring 
Committee's recommendations and the Commission's Bluefish Board (Board) 
adopted complementary management measures.

Proposed Specifications

Updated Model Estimates

    According to Amendment 1 to the FMP (Amendment 1), overfishing for 
bluefish occurs when F exceeds the fishing mortality rate that allows 
maximum sustainable yield (FMSY), or the maximum F threshold 
to be achieved. The stock is considered overfished if the biomass (B) 
falls below the minimum biomass threshold, which is defined as 1/2 
BMSY. Amendment 1 also established that the long-term target 
F is 90 percent of FMSY (FMSY = 0.19, therefore 
Ftarget = 90 percent of FMSY = 0.17), and the 
long-term target B is BMSY = 324 million lb (146,964 mt). 
The rebuilding plan established through Amendment 1 stipulates that the 
target fishing mortality rate (Ftarget) in 2009 be set at F 
= 0.31 (based upon earlier estimates ofFMSY, which was 
updated by the 41st Stock Assessment Review Committee (SARC-41) in 
2005), or the status quo fishing mortality rate (F2007), 
whichever is less.
    An age-structured assessment program (ASAP) model for bluefish was 
approved by SARC-41 in 2005 to

[[Page 9073]]

estimate F and annual biomass. The ASAP model was updated for the 
purpose of estimating the current status of the bluefish stock; i.e., 
2007 biomass and F estimates, in order to enable the Monitoring 
Committee and SSC to recommend 2009 specifications using landings 
information and survey indices through the 2007 fishing year. The 
results of the assessment update were as follows: (1) An estimated 
stock biomass for 2007, B2007 = 339.2 million lb (153,843 
mt); and (2) projected yields for 2009 using Ftarget = 
F2007 = 0.15. Based on the updated 2007 estimate of bluefish 
stock biomass, the bluefish stock is not considered overfished: 
B2007 = 339.2 million lb (153,843 mt) is greater than the 
minimum biomass threshold, 1/2 BMSY = 162 million lb (73,526 
mt), and is actually above BMSY. The bluefish stock, 
therefore, appears to be fully rebuilt. Estimates of fishing mortality 
have declined from 0.41 in 1991 to 0.15 in 2007. The new model results 
also conclude that the Atlantic stock of bluefish is not experiencing 
overfishing; i.e., the most recent F (F2007 = 0.15) is less 
than the maximum F overfishing threshold specified by SARC-41 
(FMSY = 0.19).

2009 TAL

    The FMP specifies that the bluefish stock is to be rebuilt to 
BMSY over a 9-year period (i.e., by the year 2010). The FMP 
requires the Council to recommend, on an annual basis, a level of total 
allowable catch (TAC) consistent with the rebuilding program in the 
FMP. An estimate of annual discards is deducted from the TAC to 
calculate the TAL that can be made during the year by the commercial 
and recreational fishing sectors combined. The TAL is composed of a 
commercial quota and a RHL. The FMP rebuilding program requires the TAC 
for any given year to be set based either on the target F resulting 
from the stock rebuilding schedule specified in the FMP (0.31 for 
2009), or the F estimated in the most recent fishing year (F2007 
= 0.15), whichever is lower. Therefore, the 2009 recommendation is 
based on an estimated F of 0.15. An overall TAC of 34.081 million lb 
(15,459 mt) was recommended as the coast-wide TAC by the Council at its 
August 2008 meeting to achieve the target fishing mortality rate, (F = 
0.15) in 2009, and to ensure that the bluefish stock continues to 
remain above the long-term biomass target, BMSY.
    The proposed TAL for 2009 is derived by subtracting an estimate of 
discards of 4.725 million lb (2,143 mt), the average discard level from 
2005-2007, from the TAC. After subtracting estimated discards, the 2009 
TAL would be approximately 4 percent greater than the 2008 TAL, or 
29.356 million lb (13,316 mt). Based strictly on the percentages 
specified in the FMP (17 percent commercial, 83 percent recreational), 
the commercial quota for 2009 would be 4.991 million lb (2,227 mt), and 
the RHL would be 24.366 million lb (11,052 mt) in 2009. In addition, up 
to 3 percent of the TAL may be allocated as RSA quota. The discussion 
below describes the recommended allocation of TAL between the 
commercial and recreational sectors, and the proportional adjustments 
to account for the recommended bluefish RSA quota.

Proposed Commercial Quota and Recreational Harvest Limit

    The FMP stipulates that, in any year in which 17 percent of the TAL 
is less than 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt), the commercial quota may be 
increased up to 10.500 million lb (4,763 mt) as long as the 
recreational fishery is not projected to land more than 83 percent of 
the TAL in the upcoming fishing year, and the combined projected 
recreational landings and commercial quota would not exceed the TAL. At 
the Monitoring Committee meeting in July 2008, Council staff estimated 
projected recreational landings for the 2009 fishing year by using 
simple linear regression of the recent (2001-2007) temporal trends in 
recreational landings. At that time, recreational landings were 
projected to reach 24.719 million lb (11,212 mt) in 2009. Therefore, 
projected 2009 recreational landings were slightly greater than the 
initial 2009 RHL. As such, a transfer of quota to the commercial sector 
could not occur based on those data, resulting in a significantly 
reduced commercial quota for 2009. Any amount of transfer would likely 
have caused the TAL to be exceeded. This option, therefore, represents 
the preferred alternative recommended by the Council in its 
specifications document.
    However, the Council also recommended that, if later projections 
based on more complete data indicate that recreational harvest is below 
83 percent of the TAL, the difference be transferred to the commercial 
sector in the final specifications. NMFS Northeast Regional Office 
staff recently updated the recreational harvest projection using Marine 
Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) data through Wave 5 of 
2008, and estimated the recreational harvest to be approximately 19.528 
million lb (8,858 mt), or 67 percent of the TAL. Following the 
Council's recommendation, this would allow for a transfer to the 
commercial fishery of 4.838 million lb (2,194 mt), increasing the 
commercial quota from 4.991 million lb (2,227 mt) to 9.828 million lb 
(4,458 mt). This commercial quota is 27 percent greater than the 2008 
quota, and 86 percent greater than actual 2008 commercial landings.

RSA

    A request for proposals was published to solicit research proposals 
to utilize RSA in 2008 based on research priorities identified by the 
Council (February 8, 2008; 73 FR 7528). Oneresearch project that would 
utilize bluefish RSA has been preliminarily approved by the RA and 
forwarded to the NOAA Grants Office. Therefore, a 97,750-lb (44,339-kg) 
RSA quota is proposed for use by this project, or other potential 
research projects, during 2009. This proposed rule does not represent 
NOAA's approval of any RSA-related grant award, which will be included 
in a subsequent action. Consistent with the allocation of the bluefish 
RSA, the proposed commercial quota for 2009 would be adjusted to 9.731 
million lb (4,414 mt) and the proposed RHL to 19.528 million lb (8,858 
mt). Therefore, NMFS proposes a commercial quota of 9.731 million lb 
(4,414 mt), an RHL of 19.528 million lb (8,858 mt), and an RSA quota of 
97,750 lb (44,339 kg) for the 2009 bluefish fishery.

Proposed Recreational Possession Limit

    The Council recommends, and NMFS proposes, to maintain the current 
recreational possession limit of up to 15 fish per person to achieve 
the RHL.

Proposed State Commercial Allocations

    The proposed state commercial allocations for the recommended 2009 
commercial quota are shown in Table 1, based on the percentages 
specified in the FMP. These quotas do not reflect any adjustments for 
quota overages that may have occurred in some states in 2008. Any 
potential deductions for states that exceeded their quota in 2008 will 
be accounted for in the final rule.

  Table 1. Proposed Bluefish Commercial State-by-State Allocations for
                    2009 (including RSA deductions).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     2009 Commercial    2009 Commercial
     State        Percent Share        Quota (lb)          Quota (kg)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ME                     0.6685              65,049              29,506
NH                     0.4145              40,333              18,295
MA                     6.7167             653,575             296,462
RI                     6.8081             662,469             300,496
CT                     1.2663             123,219              55,892
NY                    10.3851           1,010,533             458,378
NJ                    14.8162           1,441,702             653,956

[[Page 9074]]

 
DE                     1.8782             182,760              82,900
MD                     3.0018             292,093             132,493
VA                    11.8795           1,155,945             524,337
NC                    32.0608           3,119,709           1,415,100
SC                     0.0352               3,425               1,554
GA                     0.0095                 924                 419
FL                    10.0597             978,869             444,015
Total                100.0001           9,730,601           4,413,801
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the 
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is 
consistent with the Atlantic Bluefish FMP, other provisions of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, subject to further 
consideration after public comment.
    This action is exempt from review under E.O. 12866.
    An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as 
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The 
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, 
would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is 
being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at 
the beginning of this preamble and in the SUMMARY. A summary of the 
analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is available from the Council 
(see ADDRESSES).
    No large entities participate in this fishery, as defined in 
section 601 of the RFA. Therefore, there are no disproportionate 
effects on small versus large entities. Information on costs in the 
fishery are not readily available and individual vessel profitability 
cannot be determined directly. Therefore, changes in gross revenues 
were used as a proxy for profitability. In the absence of quantitative 
data, qualitative analyses were conducted.
    The participants in the commercial sector were defined using two 
sets of data. First, the Northeast dealer reports were used to identify 
any vessel that reported having landed 1 lb (0.45 kg) or more of 
bluefish during calendar year 2007 (the last year for which there is 
complete data). These dealer reports identified 709 vessels that landed 
bluefish in states from Maine to North Carolina. However, this database 
does not provide information about fishery participation in South 
Carolina, Georgia, or Florida. South Atlantic Trip Ticket reports were 
used to identify 856 vessels\1\ that landed bluefish in North Carolina 
and 586 vessels that landed bluefish on Florida's east coast. Bluefish 
landings in South Carolina and Georgia were near zero, representing a 
negligible proportion of the total bluefish landings along the Atlantic 
Coast in 2007. In recent years, approximately 2,063 party/charter 
vessels may have been active in the bluefish fishery and/or have caught 
bluefish.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Some of these vessels were identified in the Northeast 
dealer data; therefore, double counting is possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The IRFA in the Draft EA analyzed three alternatives (including the 
no action/status quo alternative) for allocating the TAL between the 
commercial and recreational sectors of the fishery. Consistent with the 
FMP's rebuilding schedule and the status of the resource as assessed by 
the revised SARC-41 report and the updated model projections, 
Alternative 1 was based on an overall TAL of 29.356 million lb (13,316 
mt) and included an RSA quota of 97,750 lb (44,339 kg). Alternative 2 
applies F = 0.17 based on a rebuilt bluefish stock, resulting in a TAL 
of 32.205 million lb (14,608 mt). Alternative 3, the no action/status 
quo alternative, includes an overall TAL of 28.156 million lb (12,771 
mt). The preferred NMFS alternative, not analyzed in the Draft EA, also 
applies the TAL used in the Council's preferred alternative: 29.356 
million lb (13,316 mt). Outside of the difference in the overall TAL 
specification, the alternatives differed only in the manner in which 
the TAL was allocated between the commercial and recreational sectors.
    Alternative 1 would allocate 4.974 million lb (2,256 mt) to the 
commercial sector and 24.285 million lb (11,015 mt) to the recreational 
sector, reflecting the percentage allocations specified in the FMP 
(i.e., the 17-percent commercial/83-percent recreational sector split). 
Alternative 2 would allocate 7.486 million lb (3,396 mt) to the 
commercial sector and 24.719 million lb (11,212 mt) to the recreational 
sector. Alternative 3 would allocate 7.678 million lb (3,483 mt) to the 
commercial sector and 20.380 million lb (9,244 mt) to the recreational 
sector, reflecting the commercial harvest level that was in place in 
2008 (i.e., status quo). The NMFS preferred alternative, not included 
in the Draft EA, would allocate 9.731 million lb (4,414 mt) to the 
commercial sector and 19.528 million lb (8,858 mt) to the recreational 
sector (Table 2), consistent with the Council's recommendation to 
utilize the recent updated projection for 2009 recreational harvest.

 Table 2. Proposed 2009 Atlantic Bluefish Specification Alternatives for TAL, Commercial Quota, and RHL (million
                                                      lb).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          TAL                   Commercial Quota                  RHL
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alternative 1                      29.356 (13,316 mt)           4.974 (2,256 mt)          24.285 (11,015 mt)
Alternative 2                      32.205 (14,608 mt)           7.486 (3,396 mt)          24.719 (11,212 mt)
Alternative 3                      28.156 (12,771 mt)           7.678 (3,483 mt)           20.380 (9,244 mt)
NMFS Preferred                     29.356 (13,316 mt)           9.731 (4,414 mt)           19.528 (8,858 mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the commercial sector, the recommended coast-wide quota is 
approximately 26 percent higher than the 2008 commercial quota, and 86 
percent higher than 2008 commercial landings. Based on available data, 
approximately 32 percent of the TAL was not harvested during the 2008 
fishing year. Only one state, New York, fully harvested its initial 
bluefish quota and received allocation transfers from other states in 
2008. Four additional states, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, 
and North Carolina, harvested more than 50 percent of their bluefish 
quotas, while the remaining states only harvested between 0 and 40 
percent of their allocations. Given these recent trends in landings, it 
is unlikely that the proposed TAL will be fully harvested in 2009, 
resulting in no overall coastwide economic impacts on the bluefish 
fishery. The economic impacts of the NMFS preferred

[[Page 9075]]

alternative are therefore likely to be neutral or positive relative to 
the status quo and other alternatives. For states that did not harvest 
their quotas in 2008, the proposed 2009 quotas are also not expected to 
result in any detrimental impacts. For states that exceeded their 
initial quota allocations in 2008, but received quota transfers from 
other states, the apparent economic losses would likely be mitigated by 
quota transfers during 2009, therefore resulting in no overall impacts. 
For states that exceeded their post-transfer quota allocations in 2008, 
any economic impacts would be solely due to the overage in landings.
    Impacts on individual commercial vessels were assessed by 
conducting a threshold analysis using the dealer reports for the 709 
vessels that landed bluefish from Maine through North Carolina in 2007. 
For Alternative 1, the 2009 commercial quota would be approximately 35 
percent lower than in 2008. The analysis projected that there would be 
no revenue change for 36 vessels, while 602 vessels could incur slight 
revenue losses of less than 5 percent. Approximately 71 vessels would 
incur revenue losses of more than 5 percent, including 16 vessels that 
would incur revenue losses of at least 40 percent. The majority of 
these vessels have home ports in New York and New Jersey. Of the 71 
vessels that may experience revenue losses of at least 5 percent, 30 
percent had gross sales of $1,000 or less, and 58 percent had gross 
sales of $10,000 or less, indicating that dependence on income from 
fishing for some of these vessels is very small.
    The impacts of Alternative 1 on commercial vessels in the South 
Atlantic were assessed using trip ticket data. The analysis concluded 
that, as a consequence of the 2009 allocation compared to 2007 
landings, there would be revenue losses of 3.1 percent for vessels that 
land bluefish in North Carolina, but no loss of revenue for vessels 
that land in Florida.
    The analysis of Alternative 2, which includes a 2.5-percent 
reduction in the commercial quota from 2008, concluded that there would 
be no revenue change for 147 vessels, while 513 vessels could incur 
slight revenue losses (less than 5 percent). Another 46 vessels could 
incur revenue losses of between 5 percent and 29 percent, while 3 
vessels could incur revenue losses of greater than 29 percent. Most of 
the vessels projected to incur revenue losses of greater than 5 percent 
had home ports in New York and New Jersey. The analysis of impacts of 
Alternative 2 on commercial vessels in the South Atlantic concluded 
that no revenue reduction would be expected for vessels that land 
bluefish in North Carolina or Florida.
    The analysis of Alternative 3, which maintains the status quo for 
commercial quota, concluded that there would be no change in revenue 
for 147 vessels, while 517 vessels could incur slight revenue losses 
(less than 5 percent). Another 45 vessels could incur revenue losses of 
between 5 percent and 49 percent, and zero vessels would incur revenue 
losses of greater than 49 percent. The analysis of impacts of 
Alternative 3 on vessels in the South Atlantic concluded that no 
revenue reduction would be expected for vessels that land bluefish in 
North Carolina or Florida.
    For the recreational sector of the fishery, there were no negative 
revenue impacts projected to occur with regard to the RHL, because the 
level considered in each alternative is equal to or above the 
recreational landings projected for 2009 (19.528 million lb (8,858 
mt)). The recommended RHL is lower than the other alternatives, and 
lower than the RHL implemented in 2007 (21.163 million lb (9,599 mt)) 
and 2008 (20.414 million lb (9,260 mt)). This reduction in RHL, 
however, is commensurate with an apparent decline in recreational 
bluefish harvest during 2008, and projected to continue in 2009. 
Although there is very little empirical evidence regarding the 
sensitivity of charter/party anglers to regulation, it is anticipated 
that the proposed harvest levels will not affect the demand for 
charter/party boat trips.
    The IRFA also analyzed the impacts on revenues of the proposed RSA 
amount and found that the social and economic impacts are minimal. 
Assuming that the full RSA of 97,750 lb (44,339 kg) is landed and sold 
to support the proposed research project (a supplemental finfish survey 
in the Mid-Atlantic), then all of the participants in the fishery would 
benefit from the anticipated improvements in the data underlying the 
stock assessments. Because the recommended overall commercial quota is 
higher than 2008 landings, no overall negative impacts are expected in 
the commercial sector. Based on recent trends in the recreational 
fishery, recreational landings will more than likely remain below the 
recommended harvest level in 2009.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 23, 2009.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-4284 Filed 2-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S