Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Cabbage Crop Insurance Provisions, 8705-8713 [E9-4118]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
exhausted before any action against
FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Environmental Evaluation
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has
not been prepared since this regulation
does not have an impact on small
entities and, therefore, this regulation is
exempt from the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Background
On May 22, 2008, the 2008 Farm Bill
was enacted. Section 12010 of the 2008
Farm Bill amended section 508(e) of the
Federal Crop Insurance Act (Act) by
removing paragraph (3), which has
authorized AIPs to provide a premium
discount to their insureds if they were
able to deliver the crop insurance
program for less money than they were
paid in an administrative and operating
expense reimbursement under section
508(k) of the (Act) and the Standard
Reinsurance Agreement. The provisions
of the 2008 Farm Bill are very specific
and do not allow FCIC any discretion
regarding interpretation of the
provisions or their implementation.
Therefore, elimination of the provisions
authorizing the payment of the premium
discount necessitates the removal of the
relevant provisions in 7 CFR part 400,
subpart V related to the premium
reduction plan.
Good cause is shown to make this rule
effective upon filing for public
inspection at the Office of the Federal
Register. Good cause exists when notice
and comment and the 30-day delay in
the effective date is impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. FCIC is merely making
ministerial changes to the regulation
that are mandated by the 2008 Farm
Bill. There is no discretion given to
FCIC in the terms contained in this rule
or their implementation. Therefore,
good cause exists to make this change
effective upon filing for public
inspection at the Office of the Federal
Register.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988
on civil justice reform. The provisions
of this rule will not have a retroactive
effect. The provisions of this rule will
preempt State and local laws to the
extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to
any direct action taken by FCIC or to
require the insurance provider to take
specific action under the terms of the
crop insurance policy, the
administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11 must be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Jkt 217001
8705
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(o).
Subpart V—Submission of Policies,
Provisions of Policies and Rates of
Premium
2. Revise the heading for subpart V to
read as set forth above.
■ 3. Revise section § 400.700 to read as
follows:
■
§ 400.700 Basis, purpose, and
applicability.
This subpart establishes guidelines for
the submission of policies, plans of
insurance, and rates of premium to the
Board as authorized under section
508(h) of the Act and for nonreinsured
supplemental policies in accordance
with the SRA, and the roles and
responsibilities of FCIC and the
applicant. It also specifies the
procedures for requesting
reimbursement for research and
development costs, and maintenance
costs for products and the approval
process.
§ 400.701
[Amended]
4. Revise section § 400.701 by
removing the definitions for
‘‘Administrative and operating (A&O)
costs,’’ ‘‘Agent,’’ ‘‘Approved
procedures,’’ ‘‘Compensation,’’
‘‘Efficiency,’’ ‘‘Eligible crop insurance
contract,’’ ‘‘Eligible producer,’’
‘‘Managing General Agent (MGA),’’
‘‘Plan of Operations,’’ ‘‘Premium
discount,’’ ‘‘Profit sharing
arrangement,’’ ‘‘Reduction in service,’’
‘‘Standard Reinsurance Agreement
(SRA),’’ ‘‘Third Party Administrator
(TPA),’’ ‘‘Underwriting gain,’’ and
‘‘Unfair discrimination’’.
■
§§ 400.714–400.722
[Removed]
5. Remove sections §§ 400.714
through 400.722.
■
Signed in Washington, DC, on February 19,
2009.
William J. Murphy,
Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9–4116 Filed 2–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
Administrative practice and
procedure, Crop insurance.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Final Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation amends 7 CFR Part 400 as
follows:
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
PART 400—GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Cabbage Crop Insurance Provisions
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 400 continues to read as follows:
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563–AB99
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
8706
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) finalizes the
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Cabbage Crop Insurance Provisions to
convert the cabbage pilot crop insurance
program to a permanent insurance
program for the 2010 and succeeding
crop years.
DATES: Effective Date: March 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Albright, Risk Management Specialist,
Product Management, Product
Administration and Standards Division,
Risk Management Agency, United States
Department of Agriculture, Beacon
Facility—Mail Stop 0812, PO Box
419205, Kansas City, MO 64141–6205,
telephone (816) 926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
non-significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act of 2002, to
promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to
submit an application and acreage
report to establish their insurance
guarantees and compute premium
amounts, and all producers are required
to submit a notice of loss and
production information to determine the
amount of an indemnity payment in the
event of an insured cause of crop loss.
Whether a producer has 10 acres or
1000 acres, there is no difference in the
kind of information collected. To ensure
crop insurance is available to small
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act
authorizes FCIC to waive collection of
administrative fees from limited
resource farmers. FCIC believes this
waiver helps to ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to manage their risks
through the use of crop insurance. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988
on civil justice reform. The provisions
of this rule will not have a retroactive
effect. The provisions of this rule will
preempt State and local laws to the
extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to
any direct action taken by FCIC or to
require the insurance provider to take
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
specific action under the terms of the
crop insurance policy, the
administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before any action against
FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
On Thursday, November 16, 2006,
FCIC published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 71
FR 66694–66698 to add 7 CFR 457.171
Cabbage crop insurance provisions,
effective for the 2009 and succeeding
crop years. As a result of delays in the
rulemaking process, the 2009 effective
date became impossible and FCIC will
have this rule effective for the 2010 crop
year.
The public was afforded 60 days to
submit written comments and opinions.
A total of 30 comments were received
from 3 commenters. The commenters
were an insurance services organization,
an insurance provider, and a grower
association. The comments received and
FCIC’s responses are as follows:
Comment: One commenter suggested
in the definition of ‘‘damaged cabbage
production’’ to delete the word ‘‘For’’ at
the beginning of the two phrases so it
reads ‘‘Fresh market cabbage that fails to
grade U.S. Commercial or better,’’ and
‘‘or processing cabbage that fails to
grade U.S. No. 2 or better.’’
Response: FCIC has revised the
definition accordingly.
Comment: One commenter
recommended rearranging the definition
of ‘‘marketable cabbage’’ to avoid
duplication of the phrase ‘‘Grades at
least’’ at the beginning of subsections (a)
and (b). The commenter recommended
the definition read as, ‘‘Cabbage that is
sold or grades at least: (a) U.S.
Commercial for fresh market cabbage; or
(b) U.S. No. 2 for processing cabbage.’’
Response: FCIC has revised the
definition accordingly.
Comment: One commenter
recommended adding the missing
period at the end of the sentence in the
definition of ‘‘planted acreage.’’
Response: FCIC has revised the
definition accordingly.
Comment: One commenter
recommended the definition of ‘‘price
election’’ be moved to follow the
definition of ‘‘planted acreage’’ to be in
alphabetical order.
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Response: FCIC has removed the
definition of ‘‘price election’’ in
response to other comments. Therefore,
the requested change is no longer
applicable.
Comment: One commenter questioned
that if a processor contract specifies the
number of acres rather than the amount
of production contracted, how that
contract would be affected by the
requirement in the definition of
‘‘processor contract’’ that the processor
must agree to ‘‘* * * purchase all the
production stated in the contract * * *’’
The commenter also questioned what
the ‘‘specified conditions’’ under which
delivery must be accepted.
Response: If the processor contract
specifies the number of acres rather than
the amount of production and the
processor agrees to purchase all the
production from the acreage stated in
the contract, all such production would
be considered to be under contract.
Therefore, there is no difference if the
processor contract refers to acreage or
production. Both contracts are insurable
under the terms of the policy as long as
the processor agrees to accept all
production from the acreage. The term
‘‘specified conditions’’ is vague so FCIC
has removed the phrase ‘‘and to accept
delivery subject only to specified
conditions’’ from the definition of
‘‘processor contract.’’
Comment: One commenter stated the
definition of ‘‘type’’ has changed from
specifying ‘‘Green or red cabbage’’ to a
more generic definition. The commenter
questioned if there are other categories
being considered, or is this just leaving
the option of other categories available.
Response: A more generic definition
will allow for changes or additional
types in the future. For this reason, the
definition refers to the categories of
cabbage designated as a type in the
Special Provisions.
Comment: One commenter supported
basic units by planting period as
proposed in section 2. In the past,
growers in areas where the pilot has
been operating have primarily bought
CAT coverage because unit division has
not been available. The commenter
stated that without unit division the
policy is of limited value, particularly
because of the staggered planting dates
for cabbage over a long period of time.
Response: FCIC has retained the
proposed provisions in the final rule
allowing basic units by planting period,
if applicable, and optional units by type,
if applicable.
Comment: One commenter stated
since it might be possible to have both
fresh and processing cabbage in the
same unit, section 3 might need to be
reviewed and possibly rearranged to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
address that possibility. The procedure
for determining the price, acres,
premium, liability, and indemnity for
cabbage could be extremely complicated
with the potential for multiple price
elections for fresh and processing in the
same unit.
Response: Under the proposed rule it
was possible to have processing cabbage
under different processor contracts
containing different prices in the same
unit. Calculating the price, premium,
liability and indemnity for the unit
could be very complicated if there are
multiple price elections for fresh and
processing in the same unit. Therefore,
the provisions in sections 3(c), 6 and
13(c)(1) regarding insuring processing
cabbage under the price per
hundredweight contained in a processor
contract have not been retained in the
final rule. FCIC will issue the price
election for fresh and processing
cabbage. As a result, the definition of
‘‘price election’’ has been removed
because it is no longer needed because
the definition in the Common Crop
Insurance Policy Basic Provisions will
be applicable.
Comment: Two commenters stated the
proposed addition of section 3(c),
addressing the possibility of different
price elections for multiple processor
contracts for processing cabbage, raises
questions as to whether (a) and (b) apply
only to fresh cabbage. The commenters
recommended section 3(a) should be
identified as ‘‘For fresh cabbage, * * *’’
and section 3(c) be identified as ‘‘For
processing cabbage, * * *’’.
Clarification is also needed as to
whether section 3(b), requiring the same
price percentage relationship when
there are separate price elections by
type, applies only to fresh cabbage or
also applies to the contract price
elections for processing cabbage grown
under contract.
Response: As stated above, FCIC has
removed section 3(c), which would have
insured processing cabbage using the
contracted price in the processing
contract. FCIC issues price elections for
both fresh and processing cabbage. A
cabbage producer must have a processor
contract to obtain insurance on
processing cabbage and must select one
price election for each cabbage type
designated in the Special Provisions.
Therefore, sections 3(a) and (b) apply to
both fresh and processing cabbage.
Comment: One commenter
recommended changing the phrase
‘‘different price per hundredweights’’ in
section 3(c) to the phrase ‘‘different
prices per hundredweight.’’ The
commenter also recommended changing
the word ‘‘stipulates’’ to ‘‘stipulate’’ in
the parenthetical. If the parenthetical
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8707
phrase is not revised based on other
comments, the first word should not be
capitalized (or else, it needs to be
treated as a separate sentence from the
sentence that precedes it and each
sentence needs its own period).
Response: As stated above, FCIC has
removed section 3(c) in response to
other comments.
Comment: One commenter stated the
two different types of contracts (based
on specific acreage or based on
production to be delivered) in section
3(c) should be separated. The
commenter recommended section 3(c)
be revised and a new subsection (d) be
added to read: ‘‘For processing cabbage:
‘‘(1) If there are multiple contracts
stipulating specific acreage within the
same unit with different price per
hundredweights, each contract price
will be considered a separate price
election which will be multiplied by the
number of acres specified under
applicable processor contract. ‘‘(2) If
there are multiple contracts stipulating
production within the same unit with
different price per hundredweights,
each contract price will be considered a
separate price election. ‘‘(3) Acres for
contracts stipulating production will be
determined by dividing the amount of
production to the delivered by the
approved yield. ‘‘(d) These price
amounts will be totaled to determine the
premium, liability and indemnity for
the unit.’’
Response: As stated above, FCIC has
removed the proposed provisions that
would insure processing cabbage using
the contracted prices.
Comment: Two commenters stated
there are some concerns with the new
language in section 3(c) with regard to
determining the number of acres used
when a production contract is in effect.
The calculation may result in an
artificial number of acres that do not
match what can or will be planted to
cabbage (and should not exceed the
number of acres actually planted to
cabbage). One commenter recommended
adding a definition of insured acres
since insured acres may not be planted
acres and instead of determining the
acres (when a contract stipulates the
amount of production) by dividing,
using a cup and cap on the result would
be more accurate.
Response: FCIC has removed section
3(c), which would have insured
processing cabbage using the contracted
price. However, the commenter is
correct that there must be a means to
calculate insurable acreage. FCIC has
revised section 8(c) to clarify how to
determine insurable acreage. As revised
in section 8(c), insurable acreage for
acreage and production based processor
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
8708
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
contracts is based on the lesser of the
planted acres or the maximum acres
stated in the processor contact.
Insurable acreage for production based
processor contracts will be based on the
lesser of the planted acres or the number
of acres determined by dividing the
production stated in the processor
contract by the approved yield. In
addition, FCIC has changed the
reference to ‘‘insurable acreage’’ in
section 13(c)(1) to be consistent with
section 8(c). These revisions will
prevent over-insurance.
Comment: One commenter stated the
price used to determine liability is the
only aspect of determining liability
covered in section 3 of the proposed
rule. Additional information must be
added in order for insurance providers
to understand the necessary
calculations. For example, the
commenter asked how liability is
determined for processing cabbage
when the insured has one basic unit,
two separate basic units or two optional
units and: (1) A single contract
stipulating total production to be
delivered; (2) a single contract
stipulating different prices for
production to be delivered; or (3)
multiple contracts stipulating total
production to be delivered. The
commenter stated the last sentence of
section 3(c) in the proposed rule states
‘‘These amounts will be totaled to
determine the premium, liability and
indemnity for the unit.’’ The use of the
‘‘These amounts’’ is vague. The
placement of this sentence within
section 3(c) is also questionable. The
commenter questioned whether the
intent of this sentence is to convey that
though different prices may apply to
different acres (based on different
contract prices and/or prices from the
actuarial documents), the liability for
the unit is the total of the liabilities
determined in accordance with section
3.
Response: As stated above, FCIC has
removed section 3(c) in response to
other comments.
Comment: One commenter questioned
if the deletion of the July 31 date for
California in section 5 means that
California will have whatever date is
‘‘designated in the Special Provisions,’’
or will cabbage no longer be insurable
in this state.
Response: California is not
participating in the cabbage program at
this time; if they do participate at a later
date they will be eligible under the
category ‘‘All other states and counties’’
and the date will be designated in the
Special Provisions.
Comment: One commenter
recommended adding a comma in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
section 6 following the phrase ‘‘in your
processor contract’’ for clarity.
Response: FCIC has removed the
phrase ‘‘under the price per
hundredweight contained in your
processor contract’’ in section 6 in
response to other comments. FCIC has
added a comma following the word
‘‘cabbage.’’
Comment: One commenter stated in
section 7(a)(1) through (6) the change of
‘‘and’’ to ‘‘or’’ following section 7(a)(5)
seems to indicate that not all six of these
provisions will apply in all cases.
However, the ‘‘or’’ could be understood
to mean that as long as one of the other
provisions applies, it is not necessary
for the cabbage to be planted within the
applicable plating periods. Therefore,
the commenter recommended
combining subsections (4) and (5) into
one subsection for cabbage that is either
fresh or processing cabbage, then the
word ‘‘or’’ at the end of subsection (5)
can be changed to the word ‘‘and’’.
Response: FCIC has revised the
provision accordingly.
Comment: Two commenters stated the
reference to ‘‘mustard’’ in section 7(b)
needs to be corrected to ‘‘cabbage’’.
Response: FCIC has revised the
provision accordingly.
Comment: One commenter stated
since the proposed provisions in
sections 7(b) and (c) address the insured
share rather than the insured crop, the
commenter recommended putting them
under a separate ‘‘Share Insured’’
section corresponding to section 10 of
the Basic Provisions.
Response: The provisions of sections
7(b) and (c) are consistent with other
Crop Provisions. Therefore, no change
has been made.
Comment: One commenter stated in
section 9(b) it states, ‘‘In accordance
with the provisions of section 11 of the
Basic Provisions, the end of the
insurance period will be the earlier of:
‘‘(1) The date the crop should have been
harvested; ‘‘(2) For processing cabbage,
the date you harvested sufficient
production to fulfill your processor
contract * * *; or ‘‘(3) The following
applicable calendar date after
planting:* * *’’ This seems to exclude
any consideration of the other
conditions of the Basic Provisions (i.e.,
abandonment, harvest, final adjustment
of the loss, etc.). The commenter stated
if section 9(b) were to be revised to read
‘‘In addition to the provisions of section
11(b) of the Basic Provisions * * *’’ it
would be clear that these other
conditions still apply.
Response: FCIC has changed the
phrase ‘‘In accordance with’’ to ‘‘In
addition to’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comment: One commenter
recommended section 10(a)(2) be
clarified to read ‘‘Fire, due to natural
causes’’ or ‘‘Fire, if caused by lightning’’
as is in the proposed revision to the
Tobacco Crop Provisions.
Response: Section 12 of the Basic
Provisions states all specified causes of
loss must be due to a naturally
occurring event. Further, if the
requirement for natural causes was only
included with regard to fire, it may
create the mistaken impression that fire
is the only cause of action that must be
from natural causes. Therefore, no
change has been made.
Comment: One commenter stated the
word ‘‘a’’ needs to be added before the
phrase ‘‘cause of loss’’ in section
10(a)(7).
Response: FCIC has revised the
provision accordingly.
Comment: One commenter stated in
sections 11(c)(1) and (2) that, without
some indication in the proposed rule as
to what range of hundredweight might
be given in the Special Provisions to
replace the previous policy language or
why the specified figures are being
removed, it is difficult to comment since
there is no way of knowing the
significance of the proposed policy
change. The commenter also
recommended changing the semicolon
to a comma preceding the phrase
‘‘multiplied by your insured share’’ at
the end of the first sentence in section
11(c).
Response: FCIC revised sections
11(c)(1) and (2) to specify that the
amount of replanting payment per acre
will be contained in the Special
Provisions because the replant costs
vary considerably by region. The
amount in hundredweight will be the
amount to cover the cost of replanting
the crop in that region. The semicolon
in the first sentence of section 11(c)
should be changed to a comma and the
provision has been revised accordingly.
Comment: One commenter questioned
if the phrase ‘‘In addition to section 14
of the Basic Provisions,’’ in section
12(b)(1) means the allowance for notice
of damage not later than 15 days after
the end of the insurance period from the
Basic Provisions is still afforded.
Response: FCIC did not intend for the
15 days after the end of insurance
period notice of damage from section
14(a)(2)(Your Duties) of the Basic
Provisions to be applicable to cabbage.
FCIC has revised section 12(b) to clarify
proposed section 12(b)(1) was in lieu of
section 14(a)(2)(Your Duties) of the
Basic Provisions. FCIC added a new
section 12(c) and redesignated sections
12(b)(2), (3), and (4) as sections 12(c)(1),
(2), and (3), respectively, to clarify these
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
provisions were intended to be in
addition to section 14 of the Basic
Provisions. The proposed sections 12(c)
and (d) have been redesignated as
sections 12(d) and (e), respectively, and
the reference to section 12(b) in
redesignated section 12(d) has been
revised to reference the new sections
12(b) and (c).
Comment: One commenter
recommended either adding a comma
before the phrase ‘‘except for stored
cabbage’’ or putting this phrase in
parentheses in section 12(c).
Response: FCIC has added a comma
before the phrase ‘‘except for stored
cabbage’’ in redesignated section 12(d).
Comment: One commenter stated
unless the provision in section 12(d)
affects more than just what is in section
14(a)(3) of the Basic Provisions, the
commenter recommended keeping the
more specific reference to section
14(a)(3) in the first sentence so people
do not have to read through all of
section 14 of the Basic Provisions.
Response: FCIC has revised the
provision accordingly.
Comment: Two commenters stated in
section 13(a)(1) the sentence following
section 13(a)(1)(ii) ‘‘For any processor
contract that stipulates * * *’’ should
be identified as subsection (a)(2)
otherwise, (a)(1) includes two sets of (i)
and (ii), though perhaps it would be
better if this subsection were moved to
section 13(d) [production to count]. One
commenter also stated the spelling of
‘‘nothwithstanding’’ needs to be
corrected to ‘‘notwithstanding’’.
Response: FCIC has identified the
paragraph following section 13(a)(1)(ii)
as subsection (a)(2) and has corrected
the spelling to ‘‘notwithstanding’’. FCIC
has also removed sections 13(a)(2)(ii)
and (iii) and combined section 13(a)(2)
with section 13(a)(2)(i) to be consistent
with the changes in the Mustard Crop
Insurance Provisions, which were
recently converted to a permanent crop
insurance program and contain
provisions regarding a processing crop.
Comment: Two commenters stated
section 13(a)(2)(ii) [if the subsection
(a)(2) is added as recommended above]
references section 13(b)(4), but there is
no section 13(b)(4).
Response: As stated above, FCIC has
removed section 13(a)(2)(ii) to be
consistent with the changes in the
Mustard Crop Insurance Provisions,
which were recently converted to a
permanent crop insurance program and
contain provisions regarding a
processing crop.
Comment: One commenter stated it is
unclear whether the reference to section
13(b) in section 13(a)(2)(iii) [if the
subsection (a)(2) is added as
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
recommended above] is correct. The
commenter stated perhaps it should
reference section 13(c).
Response: As stated above, FCIC has
removed section 13(a)(2)(iii) to be
consistent with the changes in the
Mustard Crop Insurance Provisions,
which were recently converted to a
permanent crop insurance program and
contain provisions regarding a
processing crop.
Comment: One commenter stated
section 13(c)(1) references the term
‘‘insured acreage’’. The commenter
recommended adding a definition of
insured acreage.
Response: FCIC has added language in
section 8(c) explaining how insurable
acreage is determined for processing
cabbage. In addition, FCIC has changed
the reference from ‘‘insured acreage’’ to
‘‘insurable acreage’’ in section 13(c)(1)
to be consistent with section 8(c).
Comment: Two commenters stated the
background of this proposed rule states
quality adjustments have been added.
There is no specific reference to quality
adjustments; however, section 13(e)
notes an adjustment for damaged
production that is sold. The commenters
recommended that, in order to maintain
consistency with other Crop Provisions
and to provide clarity, section 13(e)
should contain language regarding the
conditions under which quality
adjustments will be used.
Response: FCIC erroneously stated in
the proposed rule that quality
adjustments have been added to the
provisions. Quality adjustment
provisions were already contained in
the Pilot Cabbage Crop Provisions. FCIC
has revised the language in section
13(e)(1) to be more consistent with other
Crop Provisions and to reference a
quality adjustment. Further, the
definition of ‘‘local market price’’ has
been removed because it is no longer
required. The provision now refers to
the amount received. For cabbage to be
adjusted for damage, the damage must
have been caused by an insured cause
of loss, but the damaged cabbage must
be marketable. The definition of
‘‘marketable cabbage’’ in section 1
establishes that cabbage production that
is sold or grades at least U.S.
Commercial for fresh market cabbage or
grades at least U.S. No. 2 for processing
cabbage is marketable.
In addition to the changes described
above, FCIC has made minor editorial
changes and added a definition for
‘‘crop year.’’ FCIC has also removed any
reference to South Carolina because
they will no longer be participating in
the program.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8709
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Cabbage, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Final Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation amends 7 CFR part 457 for
the 2010 and succeeding crop years as
follows:
■
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
2. Section 457.171 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 457.171 Cabbage crop insurance
provisions.
The Cabbage Crop Insurance
Provisions for the 2010 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
FCIC policies: United States
Department of Agriculture, Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation.
Reinsured policies: (Appropriate title
for insurance provider).
Both FCIC and reinsured policies:
Cabbage Crop Insurance Provisions.
1. Definitions
Cabbage. Plants of the family
Brassicaceae and the genus Brassica,
grown for their compact heads and used
for human consumption.
Crop Year. In lieu of the definition
contained in section 1 of the Basic
Provisions, a period of time that begins
on the first day of the earliest planting
period and continues through the last
day of the insurance period for the latest
planting period. The crop year is
designated by the calendar year in
which the cabbage planted in the latest
planting period is normally harvested.
Damaged cabbage production. Fresh
market cabbage that fails to grade U.S.
Commercial or better in accordance
with the United States Standards for
Grades of Cabbage, or processing
cabbage that fails to grade U.S. No. 2 or
better in accordance with the United
States Standards for Grades of Cabbage
for Processing due to an insurable cause
of loss.
Direct marketing. Sale of the insured
crop directly to consumers without the
intervention of an intermediary such as
a wholesaler, retailer, packer, processor,
shipper, or buyer. Examples of direct
marketing include selling through an
on-farm or roadside stand, farmer’s
market, and permitting the general
public to enter the field for the purpose
of picking all or a portion of the crop.
Harvest. Cutting of the cabbage plant
to sever the head from the stalk.
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
8710
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Hundredweight. One hundred pounds
avoirdupois.
Inspected transplants. Cabbage plants
that have been found to meet the
standards of the public agency
responsible for the inspection process
within the State in which they are
grown.
Marketable cabbage. Cabbage that is
sold or grades at least:
(a) U.S. Commercial for fresh market
cabbage; or
(b) U.S. No. 2 for processing cabbage.
Planted acreage. In addition to the
definition contained in section 1 of the
Basic Provisions, cabbage plants and
seeds must initially be planted in rows
wide enough to permit mechanical
cultivation. Cabbage planted or seeds
planted in any other manner will not be
insurable unless otherwise provided by
the Special Provisions, actuarial
documents, or by written agreement.
Processor. Any business enterprise
regularly engaged in processing cabbage
for human consumption, that possesses
all licenses and permits for processing
cabbage required by the State in which
it operates, and that possesses facilities,
or has contractual access to such
facilities, with enough equipment to
accept and process the contracted
cabbage within a reasonable amount of
time after harvest.
Processor contract. A written contract
between the producer and the processor,
containing at a minimum:
(a) The producer’s commitment to
plant and grow cabbage, and to sell and
deliver the cabbage production to the
processor;
(b) The processor’s commitment to
purchase all the production stated in the
processor contract; and
(c) A price per hundredweight that
will be paid for the production.
Timely planted. In lieu of the
definition contained in section 1 of the
Basic Provisions, cabbage planted
during a planting period designated in
the Special Provisions.
Type. A category of cabbage as
designated in the Special Provisions.
2. Unit Division
(a) A basic unit, as defined in section
1 of the Basic Provisions, will also be
divided into additional basic units by
planting period if separate planting
periods are designated in the Special
Provisions.
(b) In addition to the requirements of
section 34 of the Basic Provisions,
optional units may also be established
by type if separate types are designated
in the Special Provisions.
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage
Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities
In addition to the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions:
(a) You may select only one price
election for all the cabbage in the county
insured under this policy unless the
Special Provisions provide different
price elections by type, in which case
you may select one price election for
each cabbage type designated in the
Special Provisions.
(b) The price elections you choose for
each type must bear the same
percentage relationship to the maximum
price election offered by us for each
type. For example, if you selected 100
percent of the maximum price election
for one type, you must also select 100
percent of the maximum price election
for all other types.
4. Contract Changes
In accordance with the provisions of
section 4 of the Basic Provisions, the
contract change dates are the following
calendar dates preceding the
cancellation dates:
(a) April 30 in Florida; Brooks,
Colquitt, Tift, and Toombs Counties,
Georgia; and Texas;
(b) November 30 in Alaska; Rabun
County, Georgia; Illinois; Michigan;
New York; North Carolina; Ohio;
Oregon; Pennsylvania; Virginia;
Washington; and Wisconsin; or
(c) As designated in the Special
Provisions for all other states and
counties.
5. Cancellation and Termination Dates
In accordance with the provisions of
section 2 of the Basic Provisions, the
cancellation and termination dates are:
State and counties
Cancellation and
termination dates
Brooks, Colquitt, Tift, and Toombs Counties, Georgia; Texas ...............................................................................................
Florida ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Oregon, Washington ................................................................................................................................................................
Rabun County, Georgia; North Carolina .................................................................................................................................
Alaska, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Wisconsin ..............................................................
All other states and counties ...................................................................................................................................................
July 1.
August 15.
February 1.
February 28.
March 15.
As designated in the
Special Provisions.
6. Report of Acreage
In addition to the provisions of
section 6 of the Basic Provisions, to
insure your processing cabbage, you
must provide a copy of all your
processor contracts to us on or before
the acreage reporting date.
7. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with the provisions
of section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the
crop insured will be all the cabbage
types in the county for which a
premium rate is provided by the
actuarial documents, in which you have
a share, and that are:
(1) Planted with inspected
transplants, if such transplants are
required by the Special Provisions;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
(2) If direct seeded, planted with
hybrid seed unless otherwise permitted
by the Special Provisions;
(3) Planted within the planting
periods as designated in the Special
Provisions;
(4) Planted to be:
(i) Harvested and sold as fresh
cabbage; or
(ii) Grown and sold as processing
cabbage in accordance with the
requirements of a processor contract
executed on or before the acreage
reporting date and not excluded from
the processor contract at any time
during the crop year; and
(5) Unless allowed by the Special
Provisions:
(i) Not interplanted with another crop;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(ii) Not sold by direct marketing.
(b) Under the processor contract, you
will be considered to have a share in the
insured crop to the extent you retain
control of the acreage on which the
cabbage is grown, your income from the
insured crop is dependent on the
amount of production delivered, and the
processor contract provides for delivery
of the cabbage under specified
conditions and at a stipulated price.
(c) A processing cabbage producer
who is also a processor may establish an
insurable interest if the following
additional requirements are met:
(1) The producer must comply with
these Crop Provisions;
(2) Prior to the sales closing date, the
Board of Directors or officers of the
processor must execute and adopt a
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
resolution that contains the same terms
as an acceptable processor contract.
Such resolution will be considered a
processor contract under this policy;
and
(3) Our inspection reveals that the
processing facilities comply with the
definition of ‘‘processor’’ contained in
these Crop Provisions.
8. Insurable Acreage
In addition to the provisions of
section 9 of the Basic Provisions:
(a) We will not insure any acreage that
does not meet the rotation requirements
contained in the Special Provisions.
(b) Any acreage of the insured crop
damaged before the end of the planting
period, to the extent that a majority of
producers in the area would normally
not further care for the crop, must be
replanted unless we agree that it is not
practical to replant.
(c) For processing cabbage, insurable
acreage will be:
(1) For acreage only based processor
contracts, and acreage and production
based processor contracts which specify
a maximum number of acres, the lesser
of:
(i) The planted acres; or
(ii) The maximum number of acres
specified in the contract;
(2) For production only based
processor contracts, the lesser of:
(i) The number of acres determined by
dividing the production stated in the
processor contract by the approved
yield; or
(ii) The planted acres.
9. Insurance Period
(a) In lieu of the provisions of section
11 of the Basic Provisions, coverage
begins on each unit or part of a unit the
later of:
(1) The date we accept your
application; or
(2) When the cabbage is planted in
each planting period.
(b) In addition to the provisions of
section 11 of the Basic Provisions, the
end of the insurance period will be the
earlier of:
(1) The date the crop should have
been harvested; or
(2) The following applicable calendar
date after planting;
(i) Alaska: October 1;
(ii) Florida:
(A) February 15 for the fall planting
period;
(B) April 15 for the winter planting
period; and
(C) May 31 for the spring planting
period;
(iii) Brooks, Colquitt, Tift, and
Toombs Counties, Georgia:
(A) January 15 for the fall planting
period; and
(B) June 15 for the spring planting
period;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
(iv) Rabun County, Georgia:
(A) September 15 for the spring
planting period; and
(B) October 31 for the summer
planting period;
(v) Illinois, Michigan, New York,
Ohio, and Pennsylvania:
(A) September 30 for the spring
planting period; and
(B) November 25 for the summer
planting period;
(vi) North Carolina:
(A) July 10 for the spring planting
period; and
(B) December 31 for the fall planting
period;
(vii) Oregon: December 31;
(viii) Texas:
(A) December 31 for the summer
planting period;
(B) February 15 for the fall planting
period; and
(C) April 30 for the winter planting
period;
(ix) Virginia:
(A) July 31 for the early spring
planting period;
(B) September 15 for the spring
planting period; and
(C) November 15 for the summer
planting period;
(x) Washington: December 31;
(xi) Wisconsin: November 5; and
(xii) All other states and counties as
provided in the Special Provisions.
10. Causes of Loss
(a) In accordance with the provisions
of section 12 of the Basic Provisions,
insurance is provided only against the
following causes of loss that occur
during the insurance period:
(1) Adverse weather conditions;
(2) Fire;
(3) Wildlife;
(4) Insects or plant disease, but not
damage due to insufficient or improper
application of control measures;
(5) Earthquake;
(6) Volcanic eruption; or
(7) Failure of the irrigation water
supply, if caused by a cause of loss
specified in sections 10(a)(1) through (6)
that occurs during the insurance period.
(b) In addition to the causes of loss
excluded in section 12 of the Basic
Provisions, we will not insure against
damage or loss of production due to:
(1) Failure to market the cabbage for
any reason other than actual physical
damage from an insured cause of loss
that occurs during the insurance period
(For example, we will not pay you an
indemnity if you are unable to market
due to quarantine, boycott, or refusal of
any person to accept production, etc.);
or
(2) Damage that occurs or becomes
evident after the end of the insurance
period, including, but not limited to,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8711
damage that occurs or becomes evident
after the cabbage has been placed in
storage.
11. Replanting Payments
(a) In accordance with the provisions
of section 13 of the Basic Provisions, a
replanting payment is allowed if the
crop is damaged by an insurable cause
of loss to the extent that the remaining
stand will not produce at least 90
percent of the production guarantee for
the acreage and it is practical to replant.
(b) No replanting payment will be
made on acreage planted prior to the
initial planting date or after the end of
the final planting period as designated
by the Special Provisions.
(c) In accordance with the provisions
of section 13(c) of the Basic Provisions,
the maximum amount of the replanting
payment per acre is the number of
hundredweight specified in the Special
Provisions multiplied by your price
election, multiplied by your insured
share. The fresh market cabbage price
election will be used to determine
processing cabbage replanting payments
in counties where both fresh market and
processing cabbage are insurable.
(d) When the insured crop is
replanted using a practice that is
uninsurable as an original planting, the
liability for the unit will be reduced by
the amount of the replanting payment
attributable to your share. The premium
will not be reduced.
(e) In lieu of the provisions contained
in section 13 of the Basic Provisions that
limit a replanting payment to one each
crop year, only one replanting payment
will be made for acreage replanted
during each planting period within the
crop year, if separate planting periods
are allowed by the Special Provisions.
12. Duties In The Event of Damage or
Loss
(a) Failure to meet the requirements of
this section will result in an appraised
amount of production to count of not
less than the production guarantee per
acre if such failure results in our
inability to make the required appraisal.
(b) In lieu of the provisions of section
14(a)(2)(Your Duties) of the Basic
Provisions, so that we may inspect the
insured crop, you must give us notice
within 72 hours of your initial discovery
of damage if such discovery occurs more
than 15 days prior to harvest of the
acreage.
(c) In addition to the provisions of
section 14(a)(3) (Your Duties) of the
Basic Provisions, so that we may inspect
the insured crop, you must give us
notice:
(1) Immediately if damage is
discovered 15 days or less prior to the
beginning of harvest or during harvest.
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
8712
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(2) At least 15 days prior to the
beginning of harvest, if direct marketing
of the insured crop is allowed by the
Special Provisions, and you intend to
direct market any of the crop.
(3) At least 15 days before the earlier
of:
(i) The date harvest would normally
start if any acreage on the unit will not
be harvested; or
(ii) The beginning of harvest, if any
production will be harvested for a use
other than as indicated on the acreage
report.
(d) After you have provided the
applicable notice required by sections
12(b) and (c), we will conduct an
appraisal to determine your production
to count for the purposes of section
13(d).
(1) Except as provided in section
12(e), you must not dispose of or sell the
damaged crop, or store the insured crop,
until after we have appraised it and
given you written consent to do so.
(2) If additional damage occurs after
this appraisal, except for stored cabbage,
we will conduct another appraisal.
(3) These appraisals, and any
acceptable records provided by you,
will be used to determine your
production to count in accordance with
section 13(d).
(e) In accordance with the
requirements of section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, if you initially discover
damage to any insured cabbage within
15 days of or during harvest, you must
leave representative samples of the
unharvested crop for our inspection.
The samples must be at least 3 rows
wide and extend the entire length of
each field in the unit and must not be
harvested or destroyed until the earlier
of our inspection or 15 days after
completion of harvest on the unit.
13. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a
unit basis.
(1) In the event you are unable to
provide separate acceptable production
records:
(i) For any optional units, we will
combine all optional units for which
such production records were not
provided; and
(ii) For any basic units, we will
allocate any commingled production to
such units in proportion to our liability
on the harvested acreage for the units.
(2) For any processor contract that
stipulates only the amount of
production to be delivered, and
notwithstanding the provisions of this
section or any unit division provisions
contained in the Basic Provisions, no
indemnity will be paid for any loss of
production on any unit if you produced
a crop sufficient to fulfill the processor
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
contract(s) forming the basis of the
insurance guarantee;
(b) The extent of any damaged
cabbage production must be determined
not later than the date the cabbage is
placed in storage if the production is
stored prior to sale, or the date the
cabbage is delivered to a buyer,
wholesaler, packer, processor, or other
handler if production is not stored.
(c) In the event of loss or damage
covered by this policy, we will settle
your claim by:
(1) Multiplying the insurable acreage
by its respective production guarantee
(per acre), by type if applicable;
(2) Multiplying each result in section
13(c)(1) by the respective price election,
by type if applicable;
(3) Totaling the results in section
13(c)(2);
(4) Multiplying the total production to
count of each type, if applicable (see
section 13)(d)), by its respective price
election;
(5) Totaling the results in section
13(c)(4);
(6) Subtracting the results in section
13(c)(5) from the results of section
13(c)(3); and
(7) Multiplying the result in section
13(c)(6) by your share.
For example:
For a basic unit you have 100 percent
share in 100 acres of cabbage, 50 acres
for fresh market and 50 acres for
processing as sauerkraut, with a
production guarantee (per acre) of 400
hundredweight per acre for fresh market
and 400 hundredweight per acre for
processing as sauerkraut and a price
election of $5.00 per hundredweight for
fresh market and $1.90 per
hundredweight for processing as
sauerkraut. You are only able to harvest
9,000 hundredweight of fresh market
cabbage and 9,000 hundredweight of
cabbage for sauerkraut because an
insured cause of loss has reduced
production. Your total indemnity would
be calculated as follows:
(1) 50 acres × 400 hundredweight =
20,000 hundredweight guarantee for the
fresh market acreage.
50 acres × 400 hundredweight =
20,000 hundredweight guarantee for the
processing as sauerkraut acreage.
(2) 20,000 hundredweight guarantee ×
$5.00 price election = $100,000 value of
guarantee for the fresh market cabbage.
20,000 hundredweight guarantee ×
$1.90 price election = $38,000 value of
guarantee for processing as sauerkraut.
(3) $100,000 + $38,000 = $138,000
total value of guarantee.
(4) 9,000 hundredweight × $5.00 price
election = $45,000 value of production
to count for the fresh market acreage.
9,000 hundredweight × $1.90 price
election = $17,100 value of production
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to count for the acreage for processing
as sauerkraut.
(5) $45,000 + $17,100 = $62,100 total
value of production to count.
(6) $138,000 ¥$62,100 = $75,900 loss.
(7) $75,900 × 100 percent share =
$75,900 indemnity payment.
(d) The total production to count (in
hundredweight) of marketable cabbage
from all insurable acreage on the unit
will include:
(1) All appraised production as
follows:
(i) Not less than the production
guarantee (per acre) for acreage:
(A) That is abandoned;
(B) For which you fail to meet the
requirements contained in section 12;
(C) That is put to another use without
our consent;
(D) That is damaged solely by
uninsured causes; or
(E) For which you fail to provide
production records that are acceptable
to us;
(ii) All production lost due to
uninsured causes;
(iii) All unharvested marketable
production;
(iv) All potential production on
insured acreage that you intend to put
to another use or abandon, if you and
we agree on the appraised amount of
production. Upon such agreement, the
insurance period for that acreage will
end when you put the acreage to
another use or abandon the crop. If
agreement on the appraised amount of
production is not reached:
(A) If you do not elect to continue to
care for the crop, we may give you
consent to put the acreage to another
use if you agree to leave intact, and
provide sufficient care for,
representative samples of the crop in
locations acceptable to us. (The amount
of production to count for such acreage
will be based on the harvested
production or appraisals from the
samples at the time harvest should have
occurred. If you do not leave the
required samples intact, or fail to
provide sufficient care for the samples,
our appraisal made prior to giving you
consent to put the acreage to another
use will be used to determine the
amount of production to count); or
(B) If you elect to continue to care for
the crop, the amount of production to
count for the acreage will be the
harvested production, or our reappraisal
if additional damage occurs and the
crop is not harvested; and
(2) All harvested production from the
insurable acreage.
(e) Mature production that is
considered damaged cabbage
production but is sold will be adjusted
for quality as follows:
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 37 / Thursday, February 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Dividing the amount received per
hundredweight of such damaged
cabbage production by the applicable
price election; and
(2) Multiplying the result by the
number of hundredweight of damaged
cabbage production.
14. Late and Prevented Planting
The late and prevented planting
provisions of the Basic Provisions are
not applicable.
Signed in Washington, DC, on February 19,
2009.
William J. Murphy,
Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9–4118 Filed 2–25–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2007–29255; Directorate
Identifier 2007–NM–085–AD; Amendment
39–15821; AD 2009–04–15]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300,
–400, and –500 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 737–100, –200, –200C,
–300, –400, and –500 series airplanes.
This AD requires repetitive internal
eddy current and detailed inspections to
detect cracked stringer tie clips;
measuring the fastener spacing and the
edge margin if applicable, and doing
applicable corrective and related
investigative actions. As a temporary
alternative to doing the actions
described previously, this AD requires
repetitive external general visual
inspections of the skin and lap joints
and repetitive external eddy current
sliding probe inspections, as applicable,
of the lap joints for cracks and evidence
of overload resulting from cracked
stringer tie clips, and applicable
corrective actions if necessary. This AD
results from a report of several cracked
stringer tie clips. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct multiple adjacent
cracked stringer tie clips and damaged
skin and frames, which could lead to
the skin and frame structure developing
cracks and consequent decompression
of the airplane.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:57 Feb 25, 2009
Jkt 217001
DATES: This AD becomes effective April
2, 2009.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in the AD
as of April 2, 2009.
For service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data
& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707,
MC 2H–65, Seattle, Washington 98124–
2207; telephone 206–544–5000,
extension 1, fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
ADDRESSES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527)
is the Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6447; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The FAA issued a supplemental
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an
AD that would apply to certain Boeing
Model 737–100, –200, –200C, –300,
–400, and –500 series airplanes. That
supplemental NPRM was published in
the Federal Register on August 29, 2008
(73 FR 50899). That supplemental
NPRM proposed to require repetitive
internal eddy current and detailed
inspections to detect cracked stringer tie
clips; measuring the fastener spacing
and the edge margin if applicable, and
doing applicable corrective and related
investigative actions. That supplemental
NPRM also proposed to require
repetitive external eddy current sliding
probe inspections of the lap joints for
cracks and evidence of overload
resulting from cracked stringer tie clips,
and applicable corrective actions if
necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8713
Comments
We provided the public the
opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have
considered the comments received.
Request To Clarify Effectivity
Boeing asks that the affected airplanes
specified in Note 3 of the supplemental
NPRM be clarified. Boeing states that
the original issue of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737–53–1085, Revision 1, dated
May 10, 1990 (referred to in Note 3),
contains an error in the affected
airplanes shown in the summary
section. Boeing notes that the error
shows line numbers 1 through 1000.
Boeing also states that in the planning
information section of that service
bulletin, it shows line number 1000/part
number 136 is not included in the
Group 2 airplanes (all affected Model
737–200 airplanes). In addition, Boeing
Service Bulletin 737–53–1085, Revision
1, dated May 10, 1990, includes a
change to the production line for line
numbers 1000 and on. Boeing asks that
Note 3 of the supplemental NPRM be
changed to replace line number 1000
with line number 999, and to replace
line number 1001 with line number
1000. We agree for the reasons provided
and have changed Note 3 for
clarification.
Request To Clarify Paragraph (g)
Boeing asks that we clarify the first
sentence in paragraph (g) of the
supplemental NPRM (paragraph (f) of
the final rule) by adding ‘‘as applicable’’
after the inspection method. We agree
because the inspection method depends
on the type of stringer clip. We have
changed paragraph (f) of the AD
accordingly.
Request To Clarify Paragraph (h)
Boeing asks that we clarify the first
sentence in paragraph (h) of the
supplemental NPRM (paragraph (g) of
the final rule) by adding ‘‘as applicable’’
to that sentence. We agree because the
inspection types are appropriate only
for certain airplanes. We have changed
paragraph (g) of the AD accordingly.
Request To Move Note 2
Boeing asks that we move Note 2 of
the supplemental NPRM from its
current position below paragraph (h) of
the supplemental NPRM (paragraph (g)
of the final rule) to the position below
paragraph (g) (paragraph (f) of the final
rule) and Note 1 of the supplemental
NPRM. Boeing states that Note 2
pertains to the optional/economic
inspections, which are relative to those
inspections specified in paragraph (g),
not paragraph (h). Boeing notes that
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 37 (Thursday, February 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8705-8713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-4118]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563-AB99
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Cabbage Crop Insurance
Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
[[Page 8706]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) finalizes the
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Cabbage Crop Insurance Provisions to
convert the cabbage pilot crop insurance program to a permanent
insurance program for the 2010 and succeeding crop years.
DATES: Effective Date: March 30, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Albright, Risk Management
Specialist, Product Management, Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, Beacon Facility--Mail Stop 0812, PO Box 419205, Kansas
City, MO 64141-6205, telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is non-significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of 2002,
to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies
to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a
producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the kind
of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to
small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive
collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC
believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the
same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the
use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small
entities, and, therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This final rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will
not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC
or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the
terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before any
action against FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
On Thursday, November 16, 2006, FCIC published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 71 FR 66694-66698 to add 7 CFR
457.171 Cabbage crop insurance provisions, effective for the 2009 and
succeeding crop years. As a result of delays in the rulemaking process,
the 2009 effective date became impossible and FCIC will have this rule
effective for the 2010 crop year.
The public was afforded 60 days to submit written comments and
opinions. A total of 30 comments were received from 3 commenters. The
commenters were an insurance services organization, an insurance
provider, and a grower association. The comments received and FCIC's
responses are as follows:
Comment: One commenter suggested in the definition of ``damaged
cabbage production'' to delete the word ``For'' at the beginning of the
two phrases so it reads ``Fresh market cabbage that fails to grade U.S.
Commercial or better,'' and ``or processing cabbage that fails to grade
U.S. No. 2 or better.''
Response: FCIC has revised the definition accordingly.
Comment: One commenter recommended rearranging the definition of
``marketable cabbage'' to avoid duplication of the phrase ``Grades at
least'' at the beginning of subsections (a) and (b). The commenter
recommended the definition read as, ``Cabbage that is sold or grades at
least: (a) U.S. Commercial for fresh market cabbage; or (b) U.S. No. 2
for processing cabbage.''
Response: FCIC has revised the definition accordingly.
Comment: One commenter recommended adding the missing period at the
end of the sentence in the definition of ``planted acreage.''
Response: FCIC has revised the definition accordingly.
Comment: One commenter recommended the definition of ``price
election'' be moved to follow the definition of ``planted acreage'' to
be in alphabetical order.
[[Page 8707]]
Response: FCIC has removed the definition of ``price election'' in
response to other comments. Therefore, the requested change is no
longer applicable.
Comment: One commenter questioned that if a processor contract
specifies the number of acres rather than the amount of production
contracted, how that contract would be affected by the requirement in
the definition of ``processor contract'' that the processor must agree
to ``* * * purchase all the production stated in the contract * * *''
The commenter also questioned what the ``specified conditions'' under
which delivery must be accepted.
Response: If the processor contract specifies the number of acres
rather than the amount of production and the processor agrees to
purchase all the production from the acreage stated in the contract,
all such production would be considered to be under contract.
Therefore, there is no difference if the processor contract refers to
acreage or production. Both contracts are insurable under the terms of
the policy as long as the processor agrees to accept all production
from the acreage. The term ``specified conditions'' is vague so FCIC
has removed the phrase ``and to accept delivery subject only to
specified conditions'' from the definition of ``processor contract.''
Comment: One commenter stated the definition of ``type'' has
changed from specifying ``Green or red cabbage'' to a more generic
definition. The commenter questioned if there are other categories
being considered, or is this just leaving the option of other
categories available.
Response: A more generic definition will allow for changes or
additional types in the future. For this reason, the definition refers
to the categories of cabbage designated as a type in the Special
Provisions.
Comment: One commenter supported basic units by planting period as
proposed in section 2. In the past, growers in areas where the pilot
has been operating have primarily bought CAT coverage because unit
division has not been available. The commenter stated that without unit
division the policy is of limited value, particularly because of the
staggered planting dates for cabbage over a long period of time.
Response: FCIC has retained the proposed provisions in the final
rule allowing basic units by planting period, if applicable, and
optional units by type, if applicable.
Comment: One commenter stated since it might be possible to have
both fresh and processing cabbage in the same unit, section 3 might
need to be reviewed and possibly rearranged to address that
possibility. The procedure for determining the price, acres, premium,
liability, and indemnity for cabbage could be extremely complicated
with the potential for multiple price elections for fresh and
processing in the same unit.
Response: Under the proposed rule it was possible to have
processing cabbage under different processor contracts containing
different prices in the same unit. Calculating the price, premium,
liability and indemnity for the unit could be very complicated if there
are multiple price elections for fresh and processing in the same unit.
Therefore, the provisions in sections 3(c), 6 and 13(c)(1) regarding
insuring processing cabbage under the price per hundredweight contained
in a processor contract have not been retained in the final rule. FCIC
will issue the price election for fresh and processing cabbage. As a
result, the definition of ``price election'' has been removed because
it is no longer needed because the definition in the Common Crop
Insurance Policy Basic Provisions will be applicable.
Comment: Two commenters stated the proposed addition of section
3(c), addressing the possibility of different price elections for
multiple processor contracts for processing cabbage, raises questions
as to whether (a) and (b) apply only to fresh cabbage. The commenters
recommended section 3(a) should be identified as ``For fresh cabbage, *
* *'' and section 3(c) be identified as ``For processing cabbage, * *
*''. Clarification is also needed as to whether section 3(b), requiring
the same price percentage relationship when there are separate price
elections by type, applies only to fresh cabbage or also applies to the
contract price elections for processing cabbage grown under contract.
Response: As stated above, FCIC has removed section 3(c), which
would have insured processing cabbage using the contracted price in the
processing contract. FCIC issues price elections for both fresh and
processing cabbage. A cabbage producer must have a processor contract
to obtain insurance on processing cabbage and must select one price
election for each cabbage type designated in the Special Provisions.
Therefore, sections 3(a) and (b) apply to both fresh and processing
cabbage.
Comment: One commenter recommended changing the phrase ``different
price per hundredweights'' in section 3(c) to the phrase ``different
prices per hundredweight.'' The commenter also recommended changing the
word ``stipulates'' to ``stipulate'' in the parenthetical. If the
parenthetical phrase is not revised based on other comments, the first
word should not be capitalized (or else, it needs to be treated as a
separate sentence from the sentence that precedes it and each sentence
needs its own period).
Response: As stated above, FCIC has removed section 3(c) in
response to other comments.
Comment: One commenter stated the two different types of contracts
(based on specific acreage or based on production to be delivered) in
section 3(c) should be separated. The commenter recommended section
3(c) be revised and a new subsection (d) be added to read: ``For
processing cabbage: ``(1) If there are multiple contracts stipulating
specific acreage within the same unit with different price per
hundredweights, each contract price will be considered a separate price
election which will be multiplied by the number of acres specified
under applicable processor contract. ``(2) If there are multiple
contracts stipulating production within the same unit with different
price per hundredweights, each contract price will be considered a
separate price election. ``(3) Acres for contracts stipulating
production will be determined by dividing the amount of production to
the delivered by the approved yield. ``(d) These price amounts will be
totaled to determine the premium, liability and indemnity for the
unit.''
Response: As stated above, FCIC has removed the proposed provisions
that would insure processing cabbage using the contracted prices.
Comment: Two commenters stated there are some concerns with the new
language in section 3(c) with regard to determining the number of acres
used when a production contract is in effect. The calculation may
result in an artificial number of acres that do not match what can or
will be planted to cabbage (and should not exceed the number of acres
actually planted to cabbage). One commenter recommended adding a
definition of insured acres since insured acres may not be planted
acres and instead of determining the acres (when a contract stipulates
the amount of production) by dividing, using a cup and cap on the
result would be more accurate.
Response: FCIC has removed section 3(c), which would have insured
processing cabbage using the contracted price. However, the commenter
is correct that there must be a means to calculate insurable acreage.
FCIC has revised section 8(c) to clarify how to determine insurable
acreage. As revised in section 8(c), insurable acreage for acreage and
production based processor
[[Page 8708]]
contracts is based on the lesser of the planted acres or the maximum
acres stated in the processor contact. Insurable acreage for production
based processor contracts will be based on the lesser of the planted
acres or the number of acres determined by dividing the production
stated in the processor contract by the approved yield. In addition,
FCIC has changed the reference to ``insurable acreage'' in section
13(c)(1) to be consistent with section 8(c). These revisions will
prevent over-insurance.
Comment: One commenter stated the price used to determine liability
is the only aspect of determining liability covered in section 3 of the
proposed rule. Additional information must be added in order for
insurance providers to understand the necessary calculations. For
example, the commenter asked how liability is determined for processing
cabbage when the insured has one basic unit, two separate basic units
or two optional units and: (1) A single contract stipulating total
production to be delivered; (2) a single contract stipulating different
prices for production to be delivered; or (3) multiple contracts
stipulating total production to be delivered. The commenter stated the
last sentence of section 3(c) in the proposed rule states ``These
amounts will be totaled to determine the premium, liability and
indemnity for the unit.'' The use of the ``These amounts'' is vague.
The placement of this sentence within section 3(c) is also
questionable. The commenter questioned whether the intent of this
sentence is to convey that though different prices may apply to
different acres (based on different contract prices and/or prices from
the actuarial documents), the liability for the unit is the total of
the liabilities determined in accordance with section 3.
Response: As stated above, FCIC has removed section 3(c) in
response to other comments.
Comment: One commenter questioned if the deletion of the July 31
date for California in section 5 means that California will have
whatever date is ``designated in the Special Provisions,'' or will
cabbage no longer be insurable in this state.
Response: California is not participating in the cabbage program at
this time; if they do participate at a later date they will be eligible
under the category ``All other states and counties'' and the date will
be designated in the Special Provisions.
Comment: One commenter recommended adding a comma in section 6
following the phrase ``in your processor contract'' for clarity.
Response: FCIC has removed the phrase ``under the price per
hundredweight contained in your processor contract'' in section 6 in
response to other comments. FCIC has added a comma following the word
``cabbage.''
Comment: One commenter stated in section 7(a)(1) through (6) the
change of ``and'' to ``or'' following section 7(a)(5) seems to indicate
that not all six of these provisions will apply in all cases. However,
the ``or'' could be understood to mean that as long as one of the other
provisions applies, it is not necessary for the cabbage to be planted
within the applicable plating periods. Therefore, the commenter
recommended combining subsections (4) and (5) into one subsection for
cabbage that is either fresh or processing cabbage, then the word
``or'' at the end of subsection (5) can be changed to the word ``and''.
Response: FCIC has revised the provision accordingly.
Comment: Two commenters stated the reference to ``mustard'' in
section 7(b) needs to be corrected to ``cabbage''.
Response: FCIC has revised the provision accordingly.
Comment: One commenter stated since the proposed provisions in
sections 7(b) and (c) address the insured share rather than the insured
crop, the commenter recommended putting them under a separate ``Share
Insured'' section corresponding to section 10 of the Basic Provisions.
Response: The provisions of sections 7(b) and (c) are consistent
with other Crop Provisions. Therefore, no change has been made.
Comment: One commenter stated in section 9(b) it states, ``In
accordance with the provisions of section 11 of the Basic Provisions,
the end of the insurance period will be the earlier of: ``(1) The date
the crop should have been harvested; ``(2) For processing cabbage, the
date you harvested sufficient production to fulfill your processor
contract * * *; or ``(3) The following applicable calendar date after
planting:* * *'' This seems to exclude any consideration of the other
conditions of the Basic Provisions (i.e., abandonment, harvest, final
adjustment of the loss, etc.). The commenter stated if section 9(b)
were to be revised to read ``In addition to the provisions of section
11(b) of the Basic Provisions * * *'' it would be clear that these
other conditions still apply.
Response: FCIC has changed the phrase ``In accordance with'' to
``In addition to''.
Comment: One commenter recommended section 10(a)(2) be clarified to
read ``Fire, due to natural causes'' or ``Fire, if caused by
lightning'' as is in the proposed revision to the Tobacco Crop
Provisions.
Response: Section 12 of the Basic Provisions states all specified
causes of loss must be due to a naturally occurring event. Further, if
the requirement for natural causes was only included with regard to
fire, it may create the mistaken impression that fire is the only cause
of action that must be from natural causes. Therefore, no change has
been made.
Comment: One commenter stated the word ``a'' needs to be added
before the phrase ``cause of loss'' in section 10(a)(7).
Response: FCIC has revised the provision accordingly.
Comment: One commenter stated in sections 11(c)(1) and (2) that,
without some indication in the proposed rule as to what range of
hundredweight might be given in the Special Provisions to replace the
previous policy language or why the specified figures are being
removed, it is difficult to comment since there is no way of knowing
the significance of the proposed policy change. The commenter also
recommended changing the semicolon to a comma preceding the phrase
``multiplied by your insured share'' at the end of the first sentence
in section 11(c).
Response: FCIC revised sections 11(c)(1) and (2) to specify that
the amount of replanting payment per acre will be contained in the
Special Provisions because the replant costs vary considerably by
region. The amount in hundredweight will be the amount to cover the
cost of replanting the crop in that region. The semicolon in the first
sentence of section 11(c) should be changed to a comma and the
provision has been revised accordingly.
Comment: One commenter questioned if the phrase ``In addition to
section 14 of the Basic Provisions,'' in section 12(b)(1) means the
allowance for notice of damage not later than 15 days after the end of
the insurance period from the Basic Provisions is still afforded.
Response: FCIC did not intend for the 15 days after the end of
insurance period notice of damage from section 14(a)(2)(Your Duties) of
the Basic Provisions to be applicable to cabbage. FCIC has revised
section 12(b) to clarify proposed section 12(b)(1) was in lieu of
section 14(a)(2)(Your Duties) of the Basic Provisions. FCIC added a new
section 12(c) and redesignated sections 12(b)(2), (3), and (4) as
sections 12(c)(1), (2), and (3), respectively, to clarify these
[[Page 8709]]
provisions were intended to be in addition to section 14 of the Basic
Provisions. The proposed sections 12(c) and (d) have been redesignated
as sections 12(d) and (e), respectively, and the reference to section
12(b) in redesignated section 12(d) has been revised to reference the
new sections 12(b) and (c).
Comment: One commenter recommended either adding a comma before the
phrase ``except for stored cabbage'' or putting this phrase in
parentheses in section 12(c).
Response: FCIC has added a comma before the phrase ``except for
stored cabbage'' in redesignated section 12(d).
Comment: One commenter stated unless the provision in section 12(d)
affects more than just what is in section 14(a)(3) of the Basic
Provisions, the commenter recommended keeping the more specific
reference to section 14(a)(3) in the first sentence so people do not
have to read through all of section 14 of the Basic Provisions.
Response: FCIC has revised the provision accordingly.
Comment: Two commenters stated in section 13(a)(1) the sentence
following section 13(a)(1)(ii) ``For any processor contract that
stipulates * * *'' should be identified as subsection (a)(2) otherwise,
(a)(1) includes two sets of (i) and (ii), though perhaps it would be
better if this subsection were moved to section 13(d) [production to
count]. One commenter also stated the spelling of ``nothwithstanding''
needs to be corrected to ``notwithstanding''.
Response: FCIC has identified the paragraph following section
13(a)(1)(ii) as subsection (a)(2) and has corrected the spelling to
``notwithstanding''. FCIC has also removed sections 13(a)(2)(ii) and
(iii) and combined section 13(a)(2) with section 13(a)(2)(i) to be
consistent with the changes in the Mustard Crop Insurance Provisions,
which were recently converted to a permanent crop insurance program and
contain provisions regarding a processing crop.
Comment: Two commenters stated section 13(a)(2)(ii) [if the
subsection (a)(2) is added as recommended above] references section
13(b)(4), but there is no section 13(b)(4).
Response: As stated above, FCIC has removed section 13(a)(2)(ii) to
be consistent with the changes in the Mustard Crop Insurance
Provisions, which were recently converted to a permanent crop insurance
program and contain provisions regarding a processing crop.
Comment: One commenter stated it is unclear whether the reference
to section 13(b) in section 13(a)(2)(iii) [if the subsection (a)(2) is
added as recommended above] is correct. The commenter stated perhaps it
should reference section 13(c).
Response: As stated above, FCIC has removed section 13(a)(2)(iii)
to be consistent with the changes in the Mustard Crop Insurance
Provisions, which were recently converted to a permanent crop insurance
program and contain provisions regarding a processing crop.
Comment: One commenter stated section 13(c)(1) references the term
``insured acreage''. The commenter recommended adding a definition of
insured acreage.
Response: FCIC has added language in section 8(c) explaining how
insurable acreage is determined for processing cabbage. In addition,
FCIC has changed the reference from ``insured acreage'' to ``insurable
acreage'' in section 13(c)(1) to be consistent with section 8(c).
Comment: Two commenters stated the background of this proposed rule
states quality adjustments have been added. There is no specific
reference to quality adjustments; however, section 13(e) notes an
adjustment for damaged production that is sold. The commenters
recommended that, in order to maintain consistency with other Crop
Provisions and to provide clarity, section 13(e) should contain
language regarding the conditions under which quality adjustments will
be used.
Response: FCIC erroneously stated in the proposed rule that quality
adjustments have been added to the provisions. Quality adjustment
provisions were already contained in the Pilot Cabbage Crop Provisions.
FCIC has revised the language in section 13(e)(1) to be more consistent
with other Crop Provisions and to reference a quality adjustment.
Further, the definition of ``local market price'' has been removed
because it is no longer required. The provision now refers to the
amount received. For cabbage to be adjusted for damage, the damage must
have been caused by an insured cause of loss, but the damaged cabbage
must be marketable. The definition of ``marketable cabbage'' in section
1 establishes that cabbage production that is sold or grades at least
U.S. Commercial for fresh market cabbage or grades at least U.S. No. 2
for processing cabbage is marketable.
In addition to the changes described above, FCIC has made minor
editorial changes and added a definition for ``crop year.'' FCIC has
also removed any reference to South Carolina because they will no
longer be participating in the program.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Cabbage, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Final Rule
0
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation amends 7 CFR part 457 for the 2010 and succeeding crop
years as follows:
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
0
2. Section 457.171 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 457.171 Cabbage crop insurance provisions.
The Cabbage Crop Insurance Provisions for the 2010 and succeeding
crop years are as follows:
FCIC policies: United States Department of Agriculture, Federal
Crop Insurance Corporation.
Reinsured policies: (Appropriate title for insurance provider).
Both FCIC and reinsured policies: Cabbage Crop Insurance
Provisions.
1. Definitions
Cabbage. Plants of the family Brassicaceae and the genus Brassica,
grown for their compact heads and used for human consumption.
Crop Year. In lieu of the definition contained in section 1 of the
Basic Provisions, a period of time that begins on the first day of the
earliest planting period and continues through the last day of the
insurance period for the latest planting period. The crop year is
designated by the calendar year in which the cabbage planted in the
latest planting period is normally harvested.
Damaged cabbage production. Fresh market cabbage that fails to
grade U.S. Commercial or better in accordance with the United States
Standards for Grades of Cabbage, or processing cabbage that fails to
grade U.S. No. 2 or better in accordance with the United States
Standards for Grades of Cabbage for Processing due to an insurable
cause of loss.
Direct marketing. Sale of the insured crop directly to consumers
without the intervention of an intermediary such as a wholesaler,
retailer, packer, processor, shipper, or buyer. Examples of direct
marketing include selling through an on-farm or roadside stand,
farmer's market, and permitting the general public to enter the field
for the purpose of picking all or a portion of the crop.
Harvest. Cutting of the cabbage plant to sever the head from the
stalk.
[[Page 8710]]
Hundredweight. One hundred pounds avoirdupois.
Inspected transplants. Cabbage plants that have been found to meet
the standards of the public agency responsible for the inspection
process within the State in which they are grown.
Marketable cabbage. Cabbage that is sold or grades at least:
(a) U.S. Commercial for fresh market cabbage; or
(b) U.S. No. 2 for processing cabbage.
Planted acreage. In addition to the definition contained in section
1 of the Basic Provisions, cabbage plants and seeds must initially be
planted in rows wide enough to permit mechanical cultivation. Cabbage
planted or seeds planted in any other manner will not be insurable
unless otherwise provided by the Special Provisions, actuarial
documents, or by written agreement.
Processor. Any business enterprise regularly engaged in processing
cabbage for human consumption, that possesses all licenses and permits
for processing cabbage required by the State in which it operates, and
that possesses facilities, or has contractual access to such
facilities, with enough equipment to accept and process the contracted
cabbage within a reasonable amount of time after harvest.
Processor contract. A written contract between the producer and the
processor, containing at a minimum:
(a) The producer's commitment to plant and grow cabbage, and to
sell and deliver the cabbage production to the processor;
(b) The processor's commitment to purchase all the production
stated in the processor contract; and
(c) A price per hundredweight that will be paid for the production.
Timely planted. In lieu of the definition contained in section 1 of
the Basic Provisions, cabbage planted during a planting period
designated in the Special Provisions.
Type. A category of cabbage as designated in the Special
Provisions.
2. Unit Division
(a) A basic unit, as defined in section 1 of the Basic Provisions,
will also be divided into additional basic units by planting period if
separate planting periods are designated in the Special Provisions.
(b) In addition to the requirements of section 34 of the Basic
Provisions, optional units may also be established by type if separate
types are designated in the Special Provisions.
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for
Determining Indemnities
In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic
Provisions:
(a) You may select only one price election for all the cabbage in
the county insured under this policy unless the Special Provisions
provide different price elections by type, in which case you may select
one price election for each cabbage type designated in the Special
Provisions.
(b) The price elections you choose for each type must bear the same
percentage relationship to the maximum price election offered by us for
each type. For example, if you selected 100 percent of the maximum
price election for one type, you must also select 100 percent of the
maximum price election for all other types.
4. Contract Changes
In accordance with the provisions of section 4 of the Basic
Provisions, the contract change dates are the following calendar dates
preceding the cancellation dates:
(a) April 30 in Florida; Brooks, Colquitt, Tift, and Toombs
Counties, Georgia; and Texas;
(b) November 30 in Alaska; Rabun County, Georgia; Illinois;
Michigan; New York; North Carolina; Ohio; Oregon; Pennsylvania;
Virginia; Washington; and Wisconsin; or
(c) As designated in the Special Provisions for all other states
and counties.
5. Cancellation and Termination Dates
In accordance with the provisions of section 2 of the Basic
Provisions, the cancellation and termination dates are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancellation and termination
State and counties dates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brooks, Colquitt, Tift, and Toombs July 1.
Counties, Georgia; Texas.
Florida............................. August 15.
Oregon, Washington.................. February 1.
Rabun County, Georgia; North February 28.
Carolina.
Alaska, Illinois, Michigan, New March 15.
York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia,
and Wisconsin.
All other states and counties....... As designated in the Special
Provisions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Report of Acreage
In addition to the provisions of section 6 of the Basic Provisions,
to insure your processing cabbage, you must provide a copy of all your
processor contracts to us on or before the acreage reporting date.
7. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with the provisions of section 8 of the Basic
Provisions, the crop insured will be all the cabbage types in the
county for which a premium rate is provided by the actuarial documents,
in which you have a share, and that are:
(1) Planted with inspected transplants, if such transplants are
required by the Special Provisions;
(2) If direct seeded, planted with hybrid seed unless otherwise
permitted by the Special Provisions;
(3) Planted within the planting periods as designated in the
Special Provisions;
(4) Planted to be:
(i) Harvested and sold as fresh cabbage; or
(ii) Grown and sold as processing cabbage in accordance with the
requirements of a processor contract executed on or before the acreage
reporting date and not excluded from the processor contract at any time
during the crop year; and
(5) Unless allowed by the Special Provisions:
(i) Not interplanted with another crop; and
(ii) Not sold by direct marketing.
(b) Under the processor contract, you will be considered to have a
share in the insured crop to the extent you retain control of the
acreage on which the cabbage is grown, your income from the insured
crop is dependent on the amount of production delivered, and the
processor contract provides for delivery of the cabbage under specified
conditions and at a stipulated price.
(c) A processing cabbage producer who is also a processor may
establish an insurable interest if the following additional
requirements are met:
(1) The producer must comply with these Crop Provisions;
(2) Prior to the sales closing date, the Board of Directors or
officers of the processor must execute and adopt a
[[Page 8711]]
resolution that contains the same terms as an acceptable processor
contract. Such resolution will be considered a processor contract under
this policy; and
(3) Our inspection reveals that the processing facilities comply
with the definition of ``processor'' contained in these Crop
Provisions.
8. Insurable Acreage
In addition to the provisions of section 9 of the Basic Provisions:
(a) We will not insure any acreage that does not meet the rotation
requirements contained in the Special Provisions.
(b) Any acreage of the insured crop damaged before the end of the
planting period, to the extent that a majority of producers in the area
would normally not further care for the crop, must be replanted unless
we agree that it is not practical to replant.
(c) For processing cabbage, insurable acreage will be:
(1) For acreage only based processor contracts, and acreage and
production based processor contracts which specify a maximum number of
acres, the lesser of:
(i) The planted acres; or
(ii) The maximum number of acres specified in the contract;
(2) For production only based processor contracts, the lesser of:
(i) The number of acres determined by dividing the production
stated in the processor contract by the approved yield; or
(ii) The planted acres.
9. Insurance Period
(a) In lieu of the provisions of section 11 of the Basic
Provisions, coverage begins on each unit or part of a unit the later
of:
(1) The date we accept your application; or
(2) When the cabbage is planted in each planting period.
(b) In addition to the provisions of section 11 of the Basic
Provisions, the end of the insurance period will be the earlier of:
(1) The date the crop should have been harvested; or
(2) The following applicable calendar date after planting;
(i) Alaska: October 1;
(ii) Florida:
(A) February 15 for the fall planting period;
(B) April 15 for the winter planting period; and
(C) May 31 for the spring planting period;
(iii) Brooks, Colquitt, Tift, and Toombs Counties, Georgia:
(A) January 15 for the fall planting period; and
(B) June 15 for the spring planting period;
(iv) Rabun County, Georgia:
(A) September 15 for the spring planting period; and
(B) October 31 for the summer planting period;
(v) Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania:
(A) September 30 for the spring planting period; and
(B) November 25 for the summer planting period;
(vi) North Carolina:
(A) July 10 for the spring planting period; and
(B) December 31 for the fall planting period;
(vii) Oregon: December 31;
(viii) Texas:
(A) December 31 for the summer planting period;
(B) February 15 for the fall planting period; and
(C) April 30 for the winter planting period;
(ix) Virginia:
(A) July 31 for the early spring planting period;
(B) September 15 for the spring planting period; and
(C) November 15 for the summer planting period;
(x) Washington: December 31;
(xi) Wisconsin: November 5; and
(xii) All other states and counties as provided in the Special
Provisions.
10. Causes of Loss
(a) In accordance with the provisions of section 12 of the Basic
Provisions, insurance is provided only against the following causes of
loss that occur during the insurance period:
(1) Adverse weather conditions;
(2) Fire;
(3) Wildlife;
(4) Insects or plant disease, but not damage due to insufficient or
improper application of control measures;
(5) Earthquake;
(6) Volcanic eruption; or
(7) Failure of the irrigation water supply, if caused by a cause of
loss specified in sections 10(a)(1) through (6) that occurs during the
insurance period.
(b) In addition to the causes of loss excluded in section 12 of the
Basic Provisions, we will not insure against damage or loss of
production due to:
(1) Failure to market the cabbage for any reason other than actual
physical damage from an insured cause of loss that occurs during the
insurance period (For example, we will not pay you an indemnity if you
are unable to market due to quarantine, boycott, or refusal of any
person to accept production, etc.); or
(2) Damage that occurs or becomes evident after the end of the
insurance period, including, but not limited to, damage that occurs or
becomes evident after the cabbage has been placed in storage.
11. Replanting Payments
(a) In accordance with the provisions of section 13 of the Basic
Provisions, a replanting payment is allowed if the crop is damaged by
an insurable cause of loss to the extent that the remaining stand will
not produce at least 90 percent of the production guarantee for the
acreage and it is practical to replant.
(b) No replanting payment will be made on acreage planted prior to
the initial planting date or after the end of the final planting period
as designated by the Special Provisions.
(c) In accordance with the provisions of section 13(c) of the Basic
Provisions, the maximum amount of the replanting payment per acre is
the number of hundredweight specified in the Special Provisions
multiplied by your price election, multiplied by your insured share.
The fresh market cabbage price election will be used to determine
processing cabbage replanting payments in counties where both fresh
market and processing cabbage are insurable.
(d) When the insured crop is replanted using a practice that is
uninsurable as an original planting, the liability for the unit will be
reduced by the amount of the replanting payment attributable to your
share. The premium will not be reduced.
(e) In lieu of the provisions contained in section 13 of the Basic
Provisions that limit a replanting payment to one each crop year, only
one replanting payment will be made for acreage replanted during each
planting period within the crop year, if separate planting periods are
allowed by the Special Provisions.
12. Duties In The Event of Damage or Loss
(a) Failure to meet the requirements of this section will result in
an appraised amount of production to count of not less than the
production guarantee per acre if such failure results in our inability
to make the required appraisal.
(b) In lieu of the provisions of section 14(a)(2)(Your Duties) of
the Basic Provisions, so that we may inspect the insured crop, you must
give us notice within 72 hours of your initial discovery of damage if
such discovery occurs more than 15 days prior to harvest of the
acreage.
(c) In addition to the provisions of section 14(a)(3) (Your Duties)
of the Basic Provisions, so that we may inspect the insured crop, you
must give us notice:
(1) Immediately if damage is discovered 15 days or less prior to
the beginning of harvest or during harvest.
[[Page 8712]]
(2) At least 15 days prior to the beginning of harvest, if direct
marketing of the insured crop is allowed by the Special Provisions, and
you intend to direct market any of the crop.
(3) At least 15 days before the earlier of:
(i) The date harvest would normally start if any acreage on the
unit will not be harvested; or
(ii) The beginning of harvest, if any production will be harvested
for a use other than as indicated on the acreage report.
(d) After you have provided the applicable notice required by
sections 12(b) and (c), we will conduct an appraisal to determine your
production to count for the purposes of section 13(d).
(1) Except as provided in section 12(e), you must not dispose of or
sell the damaged crop, or store the insured crop, until after we have
appraised it and given you written consent to do so.
(2) If additional damage occurs after this appraisal, except for
stored cabbage, we will conduct another appraisal.
(3) These appraisals, and any acceptable records provided by you,
will be used to determine your production to count in accordance with
section 13(d).
(e) In accordance with the requirements of section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, if you initially discover damage to any insured cabbage
within 15 days of or during harvest, you must leave representative
samples of the unharvested crop for our inspection. The samples must be
at least 3 rows wide and extend the entire length of each field in the
unit and must not be harvested or destroyed until the earlier of our
inspection or 15 days after completion of harvest on the unit.
13. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis.
(1) In the event you are unable to provide separate acceptable
production records:
(i) For any optional units, we will combine all optional units for
which such production records were not provided; and
(ii) For any basic units, we will allocate any commingled
production to such units in proportion to our liability on the
harvested acreage for the units.
(2) For any processor contract that stipulates only the amount of
production to be delivered, and notwithstanding the provisions of this
section or any unit division provisions contained in the Basic
Provisions, no indemnity will be paid for any loss of production on any
unit if you produced a crop sufficient to fulfill the processor
contract(s) forming the basis of the insurance guarantee;
(b) The extent of any damaged cabbage production must be determined
not later than the date the cabbage is placed in storage if the
production is stored prior to sale, or the date the cabbage is
delivered to a buyer, wholesaler, packer, processor, or other handler
if production is not stored.
(c) In the event of loss or damage covered by this policy, we will
settle your claim by:
(1) Multiplying the insurable acreage by its respective production
guarantee (per acre), by type if applicable;
(2) Multiplying each result in section 13(c)(1) by the respective
price election, by type if applicable;
(3) Totaling the results in section 13(c)(2);
(4) Multiplying the total production to count of each type, if
applicable (see section 13)(d)), by its respective price election;
(5) Totaling the results in section 13(c)(4);
(6) Subtracting the results in section 13(c)(5) from the results of
section 13(c)(3); and
(7) Multiplying the result in section 13(c)(6) by your share.
For example:
For a basic unit you have 100 percent share in 100 acres of
cabbage, 50 acres for fresh market and 50 acres for processing as
sauerkraut, with a production guarantee (per acre) of 400 hundredweight
per acre for fresh market and 400 hundredweight per acre for processing
as sauerkraut and a price election of $5.00 per hundredweight for fresh
market and $1.90 per hundredweight for processing as sauerkraut. You
are only able to harvest 9,000 hundredweight of fresh market cabbage
and 9,000 hundredweight of cabbage for sauerkraut because an insured
cause of loss has reduced production. Your total indemnity would be
calculated as follows:
(1) 50 acres x 400 hundredweight = 20,000 hundredweight guarantee
for the fresh market acreage.
50 acres x 400 hundredweight = 20,000 hundredweight guarantee for
the processing as sauerkraut acreage.
(2) 20,000 hundredweight guarantee x $5.00 price election =
$100,000 value of guarantee for the fresh market cabbage.
20,000 hundredweight guarantee x $1.90 price election = $38,000
value of guarantee for processing as sauerkraut.
(3) $100,000 + $38,000 = $138,000 total value of guarantee.
(4) 9,000 hundredweight x $5.00 price election = $45,000 value of
production to count for the fresh market acreage.
9,000 hundredweight x $1.90 price election = $17,100 value of
production to count for the acreage for processing as sauerkraut.
(5) $45,000 + $17,100 = $62,100 total value of production to count.
(6) $138,000 -$62,100 = $75,900 loss.
(7) $75,900 x 100 percent share = $75,900 indemnity payment.
(d) The total production to count (in hundredweight) of marketable
cabbage from all insurable acreage on the unit will include:
(1) All appraised production as follows:
(i) Not less than the production guarantee (per acre) for acreage:
(A) That is abandoned;
(B) For which you fail to meet the requirements contained in
section 12;
(C) That is put to another use without our consent;
(D) That is damaged solely by uninsured causes; or
(E) For which you fail to provide production records that are
acceptable to us;
(ii) All production lost due to uninsured causes;
(iii) All unharvested marketable production;
(iv) All potential production on insured acreage that you intend to
put to another use or abandon, if you and we agree on the appraised
amount of production. Upon such agreement, the insurance period for
that acreage will end when you put the acreage to another use or
abandon the crop. If agreement on the appraised amount of production is
not reached:
(A) If you do not elect to continue to care for the crop, we may
give you consent to put the acreage to another use if you agree to
leave intact, and provide sufficient care for, representative samples
of the crop in locations acceptable to us. (The amount of production to
count for such acreage will be based on the harvested production or
appraisals from the samples at the time harvest should have occurred.
If you do not leave the required samples intact, or fail to provide
sufficient care for the samples, our appraisal made prior to giving you
consent to put the acreage to another use will be used to determine the
amount of production to count); or
(B) If you elect to continue to care for the crop, the amount of
production to count for the acreage will be the harvested production,
or our reappraisal if additional damage occurs and the crop is not
harvested; and
(2) All harvested production from the insurable acreage.
(e) Mature production that is considered damaged cabbage production
but is sold will be adjusted for quality as follows:
[[Page 8713]]
(1) Dividing the amount received per hundredweight of such damaged
cabbage production by the applicable price election; and
(2) Multiplying the result by the number of hundredweight of
damaged cabbage production.
14. Late and Prevented Planting
The late and prevented planting provisions of the Basic Provisions
are not applicable.
Signed in Washington, DC, on February 19, 2009.
William J. Murphy,
Acting Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E9-4118 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P