Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600), CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604) Airplanes, 8039-8043 [E9-3778]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Proposed Rules FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. Related Information (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2008– 0161, dated August 25, 2008; Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330–92–3066, Revision 01, dated August 1, 2008; and Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340–92– 4071, Revision 01, dated August 1, 2008, and Revision 02, dated November 28, 2008; for related information. Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 5, 2009. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–3776 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2009–0044; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–132–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL–600–1A11 (CL–600), CL– 600–2A12 (CL–601), CL–600–2B16 (CL– 601–3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604) Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS AGENCY: SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Feb 20, 2009 Jkt 217001 There have been several Stick Pusher Capstan Shaft failures causing the dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function. * * * Dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 25, 2009. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Bombardier, ˆ Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, ´ Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Valentine, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE– 172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 8039 Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7328; fax (516) 794–5531. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2009–0044; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–132–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2008–12, dated February 8, 2008 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: There have been several Stick Pusher Capstan Shaft failures causing the dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function. This directive is issued to revise the first flight of the day check [in the Airplane Flight Manual] of the stall protection system to detect a degradation of the stick pusher function. It also introduces a new periodic maintenance task [in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the Instructions for Continuing Airworthiness] to check the structural integrity of the stick pusher capstan shaft. Dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. Relevant Service Information Bombardier has issued the temporary revisions listed in the tables titled ‘‘Temporary Revisions to the Airplane Flight Manual’’ and ‘‘Temporary Revisions to the Airworthiness Limitations Section.’’ The actions described in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1 8040 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Proposed Rules TEMPORARY REVISIONS TO THE AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL Use Canadair temporary revision— For Bombardier model— Dated— To the Normal Procedures section of— Canadair Challenger CL–600–1A11 AFM. Canadair Challenger CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets). Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B–1. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1A–1. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1–1. Canadair Challenger CL–604 AFM, PSP 604–1. CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ........................ CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ........................ 600/23 600–1/18 January 30, 2007 ........ January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 601/15 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 601/16 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 601/20 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 CL–600–2B16 planes. CL–600–2B16 planes. CL–600–2B16 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ (CL–601–3A, and CL–601–3R) air- 601/28 601/27 January 30, 2007 ........ January 30, 2007 ........ (CL–601–3A, and CL–601–3R) air- 601/28 January 30, 2007 ........ (CL–604) airplanes ........................ 604/22 January 30, 2007 ........ TEMPORARY REVISIONS TO THE AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS SECTION Use Canadair temporary revision— For Bombardier model— Dated— To the Airworthiness Limitations section of— Canadair Challenger Time Limits/Maintenance Checks (TLMC), PSP 605, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 601–5, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 601A–5, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. Canadair Challenger CL–604 TLMC, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–40. CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ........................ 5–138 June 26, 2007 ............. CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 5–226 June 26, 2007 ............. CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, and CL–601–3R) airplanes. CL–600–2B16 (CL–604) airplanes ........................ 5–239 June 26, 2007 ............. 5–2–32 May 31, 2007 .............. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS FAA’s Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information. We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Feb 20, 2009 Jkt 217001 Costs of Compliance Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD would affect 707 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take 1 workhour per product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per workhour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $56,560, or $80 per product. promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Proposed Rules 8041 under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA–2009–0044; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–132–AD. PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES Comments Due Date List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, (a) We must receive comments by March 25, 2009. Affected ADs Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 (b) None. Applicability [Amended] (c) This AD applies to the airplanes listed in Table 1 of this AD, certificated in any category. 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: TABLE 1—APPLICABILITY Bombardier model— Serial Nos.— CL–600–1A11 CL–600–2A12 CL–600–2B16 CL–600–2B16 1004 3001 5001 5301 (CL–600) airplanes ........................................................... (CL–601) airplanes ........................................................... (CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R) airplanes ............................... (CL–604) airplanes ........................................................... Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. The request should include a description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure the continued operational safety of the airplane. Subject (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight Controls. through through through through 1085 3066 5194 5665 inclusive. inclusive. inclusive. inclusive. Reason Actions and Compliance (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: There have been several Stick Pusher Capstan Shaft failures causing the dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function. This directive is issued to revise the first flight of the day check [in the Airplane Flight Manual] of the stall protection system to detect a degradation of the stick pusher function. It also introduces a new periodic maintenance task [in the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the Instructions for Continuing Airworthiness] to check the structural integrity of the stick pusher capstan shaft. Dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. (f) Unless already done, do the following actions. (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the Normal Procedures section of the applicable airplane flight manual (AFM) by inserting a copy of the applicable TR listed in Table 2 of this AD. Thereafter, operate the airplanes per the procedures specified in the applicable TR, except as provided by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. If the operator has an AFM that is not listed in Table 2 of this AD, within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the AFM using a method approved by the FAA or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated agent). TABLE 2—TEMPORARY REVISIONS TO THE AFM Use Canadair temporary revision— For Bombardier model— Dated— To the Normal Procedures section of— Canadair Challenger CL–600–1A11 AFM. Canadair Challenger CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets). Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B–1. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1A–1. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2A12 AFM. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1. Canadair Challenger CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1–1. Canadair Challenger CL–604 AFM, PSP 604–1. 600/23 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ........................ 600–1/18 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 601/15 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 601/16 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 601/20 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ........................ 601/28 January 30, 2007 ........ CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, and CL–601–3R) airplanes. CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, and CL–601–3R) airplanes. CL–600–2B16 (CL–604) airplanes ........................ 601/27 January 30, 2007 ........ 601/28 January 30, 2007 ........ 604/22 January 30, 2007 ........ VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Feb 20, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1 8042 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Proposed Rules (2) When information identical to that in a TR specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD has been included in the general revisions of the applicable AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the AFM, and the TR may be removed from that AFM. (3) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by incorporating the applicable task in the TR listed in Table 3 of this AD. For all tasks identified in the TRs, the initial compliance time starts from the later of the times specified in paragraph (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this AD. Thereafter, except as provided by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, no alternative maintenance task intervals may be used. (i) Within the compliance time specified in the ‘‘Check Interval’’ or ‘‘Task Interval,’’ as applicable, after the effective date of this AD. (ii) Within the compliance time specified in the ‘‘Check Interval’’ or ‘‘Task Interval,’’ as applicable, after the date of issuance of the original Canadian airworthiness certificate or the date of issuance of the original Canadian export certificate of airworthiness. TABLE 3—TEMPORARY REVISIONS TO THE AIRWORTHINESS LIMITATIONS SECTION Use Canadair temporary revision— For Bombardier model— Dated— To the Airworthiness Limitations section of— Canadair Challenger Time Limits/Maintenance Checks (TLMC), PSP 605, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 601–5, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 601A–5, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. Canadair Challenger CL–604 TLMC, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–40. CL–600–1A11 (CL–600) airplanes ........................ 5–138 June 26, 2007 ............. CL–600–2A12 (CL–601) airplanes ........................ 5–226 June 26, 2007 ............. CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, and CL–601–3R) airplanes. CL–600–2B16 (CL–604) airplanes ........................ 5–239 June 26, 2007 ............. 5–2–32 May 31, 2007 .............. (4) When the information in applicable TR listed in Table 3 of this AD has been included in the general revisions of the applicable chapter of the Airworthiness Limitations section, the TR may be removed from the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instruction for Continued Airworthiness. FAA AD Differences Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information as follows: No differences. Other FAA AD Provisions (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Bruce Valentine, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7328; fax (516) 794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. (4) Special Flight Permits: Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199), are not allowed. Related Information (h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF–2008–12, dated February 8, 2008, and the service information listed in Table 4 of this AD, for related information. TABLE 4—ALL SERVICE INFORMATION Dated— To the— 5–138 ................................... 600/23 .................................. 600–1/18 .............................. 5–226 ................................... 601/15 .................................. 601/16 .................................. 601/20 .................................. 601/28 .................................. 5–239 ................................... 601/27 .................................. 601/28 .................................. 5–2–32 ................................. 604/22 .................................. rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS Canadair TR— June 26, 2007 .................... January 30, 2007 ............... January 30, 2007 ............... June 26, 2007 .................... January 30, 2007 ............... January 30, 2007 ............... January 30, 2007 ............... January 30, 2007 ............... June 26, 2007 .................... January 30, 2007 ............... January 30, 2007 ............... May 31, 2007 ..................... January 30, 2007 ............... Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair Canadair VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Feb 20, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Challenger Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 TLMC, PSP 605, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. CL–600–1A11 AFM. CL–600–1A11 AFM (Winglets). TLMC, PSP 601–5, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B–1. CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1A–1. CL–600–2A12 AFM, PSP 601–1B. CL–600–2A12 AFM. TLMC, PSP 601A–5, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–30. CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1. CL–600–2B16 AFM, PSP 601A–1–1. CL–604 TLMC, Chapter 5, Section 5–10–40. CL–604 AFM, PSP 604–1. E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Proposed Rules Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 15, 2009. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–3778 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2009–0005; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–164–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A. (CASA), Model C–212–CB, C–212–CC, C–212–CD, C–212–CE, C–212–CF, and C–212–DE Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 25, 2009. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact EADS–CASA, Military Transport Aircraft Division (MTAD), Integrated Customer Services (ICS), Technical Services, Avenida de ´ Aragon 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585 55 84; fax +34 91 585 55 05; e-mail MTA.TechnicalService@casa.eads.net; Internet https://www.eads.net. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. Examining the AD Docket Incidents have been reported on BrittenNorman BN–2 aircraft, where cracks were found in the inner shell of the pitot/static pressure heads. The investigation concluded that these pitot tubes, supplied by Thales Optronics, could be operated outside their voltage specification. On December 15th, 2005, CAA [Civil Aviation Authority] United Kingdom issued AD G–2005–0034 (EASA approval number 2005–6447), later superseded by EASA AD 2006–0143, to require inspections and leak tests on BrittenNorman aircraft. Subsequently, it has been discovered that the same tubes are supplied to EADS–CASA for installation on C–212 aircraft, one for the pilot side and one for the co-pilot side. So far, EADS–CASA has not received any report of cracked pitot tubes from C–212 operators. This condition, if not corrected, could result in incorrect readings on the pressure instrumentation, e.g., altimeters, vertical speed indicators (rate of climb) and airspeed indicators, potentially leading to navigational errors. You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM– 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1112; fax (425) 227–1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The unsafe condition could reduce the ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and landing of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. Comments Invited VerDate Nov<24>2008 16:49 Feb 20, 2009 Jkt 217001 We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 8043 FAA–2009–0005; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–164–AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this proposed AD. Discussion The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008–0155, dated August 11, 2008 (referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: Incidents have been reported on BrittenNorman BN–2 aircraft, where cracks were found in the inner shell of the pitot/static pressure heads. The investigation concluded that these pitot tubes, supplied by Thales Optronics, could be operated outside their voltage specification. On December 15th, 2005, CAA [Civil Aviation Authority] United Kingdom issued AD G–2005–0034 (EASA approval number 2005–6447), later superseded by EASA AD 2006–0143, to require inspections and leak tests on BrittenNorman aircraft. Subsequently, it has been discovered that the same tubes are supplied to EADS–CASA for installation on C–212 aircraft, one for the pilot side and one for the co-pilot side. So far, EADS–CASA has not received any report of cracked pitot tubes from C–212 operators. This condition, if not corrected, could result in incorrect readings on the pressure instrumentation, e.g., altimeters, vertical speed indicators (rate of climb) and airspeed indicators, potentially leading to navigational errors. For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires the inspection of the affected pitot tubes, and, if cracks are found, replacement of those tubes with the new P/N [part number] 212–A0150–0001 and 212–A0150–0002 pitot tubes. The unsafe condition could reduce the ability of the flightcrew to maintain the safe flight and landing of the airplane. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket. Relevant Service Information CASA has issued Chapter 5 of the C– 212 Series 100/200 Maintenance Manual, Revision 2, dated June 11, 2002; and Service Bulletin SB–212–34– 11, Revision 1, dated February 27, 2008. The actions described in this service E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM 23FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 34 (Monday, February 23, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8039-8043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0044; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-132-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600),
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604)
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

There have been several Stick Pusher Capstan Shaft failures
causing the dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher
function. * * *

Dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function could
result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 25, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; e-mail
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.

Examining the AD Docket

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Valentine, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7328; fax (516) 794-5531.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0044;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-132-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2008-12, dated February 8, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

There have been several Stick Pusher Capstan Shaft failures
causing the dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher
function. This directive is issued to revise the first flight of the
day check [in the Airplane Flight Manual] of the stall protection
system to detect a degradation of the stick pusher function. It also
introduces a new periodic maintenance task [in the Airworthiness
Limitations Section of the Instructions for Continuing
Airworthiness] to check the structural integrity of the stick pusher
capstan shaft.

Dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function could
result in reduced controllability of the airplane. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

Bombardier has issued the temporary revisions listed in the tables
titled ``Temporary Revisions to the Airplane Flight Manual'' and
``Temporary Revisions to the Airworthiness Limitations Section.'' The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

[[Page 8040]]

Temporary Revisions to the Airplane Flight Manual
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use Canadair
For Bombardier model-- temporary Dated-- To the Normal Procedures
revision-- section of--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.... 600/23 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-1A11 AFM.
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.... 600-1/18 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-1A11 AFM (Winglets).
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/15 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12 AFM, PSP 601-1B-
1.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/16 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12 AFM, PSP 601-1A-
1.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/20 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12 AFM, PSP 601-
1B.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/28 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12 AFM.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, and CL-601- 601/27 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
3R) airplanes. 600-2B16 AFM, PSP 601A-
1.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, and CL-601- 601/28 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
3R) airplanes. 600-2B16 AFM, PSP 601A-1-
1.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes.... 604/22 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
604 AFM, PSP 604-1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Temporary Revisions to the Airworthiness Limitations Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use Canadair
For Bombardier model-- temporary Dated-- To the Airworthiness
revision-- Limitations section of--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.... 5-138 June 26, 2007.................... Canadair Challenger Time
Limits/Maintenance
Checks (TLMC), PSP 605,
Chapter 5, Section 5-10-
30.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 5-226 June 26, 2007.................... Canadair Challenger TLMC,
PSP 601-5, Chapter 5,
Section 5-10-30.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, and CL-601- 5-239 June 26, 2007.................... Canadair Challenger TLMC,
3R) airplanes. PSP 601A-5, Chapter 5,
Section 5-10-30.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes.... 5-2-32 May 31, 2007..................... Canadair Challenger CL-
604 TLMC, Chapter 5,
Section 5-10-40.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 707 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
would take 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $56,560, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities

[[Page 8041]]

under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec. 39.13 [Amended]

2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2009-0044;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-132-AD.

Comments Due Date

(a) We must receive comments by March 25, 2009.

Affected ADs

(b) None.

Applicability

Table 1--Applicability
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bombardier model-- Serial Nos.--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes......... 1004 through 1085 inclusive.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes......... 3001 through 3066 inclusive.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R) 5001 through 5194 inclusive.
airplanes.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes......... 5301 through 5665 inclusive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

Dormant loss or severe degradation of the stick pusher function
could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.

Actions and Compliance

(f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise
the Normal Procedures section of the applicable airplane flight
manual (AFM) by inserting a copy of the applicable TR listed in
Table 2 of this AD. Thereafter, operate the airplanes per the
procedures specified in the applicable TR, except as provided by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. If the operator has an AFM that is not
listed in Table 2 of this AD, within 30 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the AFM using a method approved by the FAA
or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated agent).

Table 2--Temporary Revisions to the AFM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use Canadair
For Bombardier model-- temporary Dated-- To the Normal Procedures
revision-- section of--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.... 600/23 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-1A11
AFM.
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.... 600-1/18 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-1A11
AFM (Winglets).
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/15 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B-1.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/16 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1A-1.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/20 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12
AFM, PSP 601-1B.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 601/28 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
600-2A12
AFM.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, and CL-601- 601/27 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
3R) airplanes. 600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, and CL-601- 601/28 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
3R) airplanes. 600-2B16
AFM, PSP 601A-1-1.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes.... 604/22 January 30, 2007................. Canadair Challenger CL-
604
AFM, PSP 604-1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 8042]]

(2) When information identical to that in a TR specified in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD has been included in the general
revisions of the applicable AFM, the general revisions may be
inserted into the AFM, and the TR may be removed from that AFM.
(3) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise
the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness by incorporating the applicable task in the
TR listed in Table 3 of this AD. For all tasks identified in the
TRs, the initial compliance time starts from the later of the times
specified in paragraph (f)(3)(i) and (f)(3)(ii) of this AD.
Thereafter, except as provided by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, no
alternative maintenance task intervals may be used.
(i) Within the compliance time specified in the ``Check
Interval'' or ``Task Interval,'' as applicable, after the effective
date of this AD.
(ii) Within the compliance time specified in the ``Check
Interval'' or ``Task Interval,'' as applicable, after the date of
issuance of the original Canadian airworthiness certificate or the
date of issuance of the original Canadian export certificate of
airworthiness.

Table 3--Temporary Revisions to the Airworthiness Limitations Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use Canadair
For Bombardier model-- temporary Dated-- To the Airworthiness
revision-- Limitations section of--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.... 5-138 June 26, 2007.................... Canadair Challenger Time
Limits/Maintenance
Checks (TLMC), PSP 605,
Chapter 5, Section 5-10-
30.
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes.... 5-226 June 26, 2007.................... Canadair Challenger TLMC,
PSP 601-5, Chapter 5,
Section 5-10-30.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, and CL-601- 5-239 June 26, 2007.................... Canadair Challenger TLMC,
3R) airplanes. PSP 601A-5, Chapter 5,
Section 5-10-30.
CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes.... 5-2-32 May 31, 2007..................... Canadair Challenger CL-
604 TLMC, Chapter 5,
Section 5-10-40.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(4) When the information in applicable TR listed in Table 3 of
this AD has been included in the general revisions of the applicable
chapter of the Airworthiness Limitations section, the TR may be
removed from the Airworthiness Limitations section of the
Instruction for Continued Airworthiness.

FAA AD Differences

Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Bruce Valentine,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA,
New York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7328; fax (516)
794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI)
in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
(4) Special Flight Permits: Special flight permits, as described
in Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199), are not allowed.

Related Information

(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-12,
dated February 8, 2008, and the service information listed in Table
4 of this AD, for related information.

Table 4--All Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadair TR-- Dated-- To the--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-138................................... June 26, 2007.............. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 605,
Chapter 5, Section 5-10-30.
600/23.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-1A11 AFM.
600-1/18................................ January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-1A11 AFM
(Winglets).
5-226................................... June 26, 2007.............. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 601-5,
Chapter 5, Section 5-10-30.
601/15.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-2A12 AFM, PSP
601-1B-1.
601/16.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-2A12 AFM, PSP
601-1A-1.
601/20.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-2A12 AFM, PSP
601-1B.
601/28.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-2A12 AFM.
5-239................................... June 26, 2007.............. Canadair Challenger TLMC, PSP 601A-5,
Chapter 5, Section 5-10-30.
601/27.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-2B16 AFM, PSP
601A-1.
601/28.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-600-2B16 AFM, PSP
601A-1-1.
5-2-32.................................. May 31, 2007............... Canadair Challenger CL-604 TLMC, Chapter
5, Section 5-10-40.
604/22.................................. January 30, 2007........... Canadair Challenger CL-604 AFM, PSP 604-
1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 8043]]

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 15, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-3778 Filed 2-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.