Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of the Proposed Transmission Agency of Northern California Transmission Project, California, 8086-8088 [E9-3772]
Download as PDF
8086
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Notices
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC
Online service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–3687 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Construction, Operation, and
Maintenance of the Proposed
Transmission Agency of Northern
California Transmission Project,
California
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Western Area Power
Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report and
conduct scoping meetings; notice of
floodplain and wetlands involvement.
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power
Administration (Western), an agency of
the DOE intends to prepare a joint
environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report (EIS/EIR)
for the construction, operation, and
maintenance of the proposed
Transmission Agency of Northern
California (TANC) Transmission Project
(Project) in California. Western is
issuing this Notice to inform the public
and interested parties about the
proposed Project, conduct a public
scoping process, and invite the public to
comment on the scope, proposed action,
alternatives, and other issues to be
addressed in the EIS/EIR.
The EIS/EIR will address the
construction, maintenance, and
operation of the proposed Project,
which would include building and
upgrading about 600 miles of 230kilovolt (kV) and 500-kV transmission
lines and associated equipment and
facilities in northern California. Portions
of the proposed Project may affect
floodplains and wetlands in the area.
Western and TANC will hold public
scoping meetings in 12 locations in the
Project area during the public scoping
period. At the scoping meetings,
Western and TANC will share
additional information on the proposed
Project and receive comments and
suggestions on the scope of the EIS/EIR.
DATES: The public scoping period begins
with the publication of this Federal
Register notice and closes on April 30,
2009. Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:31 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
INFORMATION
section for scoping meeting
dates.
ADDRESSES: Please see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for
scoping meeting locations. Written
comments on the scope of the EIS
should be addressed to Mr. David
Young, National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) Document Manager,
Western Area Power Administration,
Sierra Nevada Region, 114 Parkshore
Drive, Folsom, CA 95630, telephone
(916) 353–4777, fax (916) 353–4772, or
e-mail TTPEIS@wapa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Young, NEPA Document
Manager, Western Area Power
Administration, Sierra Nevada Region,
114 Parkshore Drive, Folsom, CA 95630,
telephone (916) 353–4777, fax (916)
353–4772, or e-mail TTPEIS@wapa.gov.
Additional information and submitted
comments on the proposed project can
be found at https://www.wapa.gov/
transmission/ttp.htm. For general
information on DOE’s NEPA review
procedures or status of a NEPA review,
contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom,
Director of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, GC–20, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585, telephone
(202) 586–4600 or (800) 472–2756.
Western,
an agency within DOE, markets Federal
hydroelectric power to preference
customers, as specified by law. These
customers include municipalities,
cooperatives, irrigation districts, Federal
and State agencies, and Native
American tribes. Western’s service
territory covers 15 western states,
including California. Western owns and
operates more than 17,000 miles of
high-voltage transmission lines.
TANC is a registered Transmission
Owner, Transmission Planner, and
Transmission Service Provider (as these
terms are defined by the North
American Electric Reliability
Corporation). TANC’s mission is to
assist its publicly owned utility
members in providing cost-effective
energy supplies to their customers,
through construction and long-term
ownership of high-voltage transmission
lines within California and the western
United States. TANC’s membership
includes the California cities of
Alameda, Biggs, Gridley, Healdsburg,
Lodi, Lompoc, Palo Alto, Redding,
Roseville, Santa Clara, and Ukiah, the
Sacramento Municipal Utility District,
Modesto Irrigation District, and Turlock
Irrigation District. The Plumas-Sierra
Rural Electric Cooperative is an
associate member of TANC.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Advance Notice of Intent
Western published an Advance Notice
of Intent (NOI) to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report; Notice of
Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement
on January 7, 2008 (74 FR 707). The
Advance NOI provided a project
description and stated that Western
would be issuing a formal NOI in early
2009 (74 FR 708). This is the formal NOI
discussed in the Advance NOI.
Background and Need for Agency
Action
Western and TANC propose to
coordinate development of the proposed
Project, which includes new and
upgraded 230-kV and 500-kV
transmission lines, substations, and
related facilities. The Project would
satisfy Western’s and TANC’s need to
develop new access to renewable energy
resources in northeastern California,
northwestern Nevada, and the Pacific
Northwest, enhance the CaliforniaOregon Intertie, reduce existing
congestion and system losses, increase
the load-carrying capability and
reliability of northern California’s
transmission system, improve the
reliability of the Balancing Authority
Area, in which Western resides, and
relieve certain existing electrical
transmission system constraints in
northern California.
Project Description
Details and plans for the proposed
Project and alternatives are still being
developed and refinements will
continue throughout the public scoping
process. TANC would own all facilities
of the proposed Project except for the
Federal Transmission System owned by
Western and the Sierra Foothills
Segment, as noted below. Western’s
Federal Transmission System
ownership includes the land rights,
towers, and circuit 1 between Tracy
Substation and Livermore Substation.
Some of the facilities associated with
the proposed Project may require
modifications to and/or
interconnections with Western’s
transmission system.
Proposed Routes and Alternative
Routes
The proposed Project would be
located entirely in California. The
corridor would consist of five segments
of transmission line that extend from
northeastern California through the
Central Valley and split westward to the
San Francisco Bay area and eastward to
the Sierra Foothills. The proposed
corridors have been identified to avoid,
to the extent possible, residential and
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Notices
known environmentally-sensitive areas,
and take optimum advantage of
accessible competitive renewable energy
zones, as recommended by the State of
California’s Renewable Energy
Transmission Initiative.
North Segment. The North Segment
would include two, new, single-circuit,
500-kV transmission lines, each
trending west from a proposed new
substation near Ravendale to a
proposed, substation near Pacific Gas &
Electric Company’s (PG&E) existing
Round Mountain Substation. Three
corridor alternatives, each 80 to 100
miles long, have been identified. These
three alternative corridors would be
located generally to the north of Eagle
Lake and State Route (SR) 44; and near
SR 299. The North Segment would
include a new, 1-mile, double-circuit,
500-kV transmission line from the
proposed new substation near Round
Mountain to PG&E’s Round Mountain
Substation. The North Segment would
continue with a new, double-circuit,
500-kV transmission line that would run
40 to 45 miles southwest to the
California-Oregon Transmission
Project’s (COTP) existing Olinda
Substation, south of Redding. Three
corridor alternatives have been
preliminarily identified for this
segment.
Central Segment. The Central
Segment would begin at the Olinda
Substation and trend south,
approximately 170 to 190 miles to
Tracy. It would include a new, doublecircuit, 500-kV transmission line
through the Central Valley to a new
substation in southern Sacramento
County and on to a new substation near
the COTP’s existing Tracy Substation.
Three possible alternative corridors
have been identified for the Central
Segment: the western, central, and
eastern alternatives.
The 172-mile western corridor
alternative of the Central Segment
would lie along the western side of the
Sacramento Valley. This alternative
would be roughly parallel to and 5 to 20
miles west of the Interstate 5 corridor.
It would pass just east of Black Butte
Lake and west of the cities of Orland,
Willows, and Williams. South of
Winters, the western alternative would
turn east and cross between the cities of
Dixon and Vacaville before continuing
east for approximately 35 miles to a
proposed new substation in southern
Sacramento County, west of SR 99 and
south of Elk Grove.
The 167-mile central corridor
alternative runs roughly parallel to and
5 to 10 miles west of SR 99 through the
Sacramento Valley, just west of the
cities of Red Bluff and Chico, then
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:31 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
between the Sutter Buttes and Yuba
City, and east of the cities of Woodland
and Davis. The central alternative
would then turn southeast, converging
with the western alternative, and
interconnect at the proposed new
substation in southern Sacramento
County.
The 173-mile eastern corridor
alternative would be located west of the
Sierra Foothills of the Sacramento
Valley, roughly parallel to and 5 to 10
miles east of SR 99. This alignment
would pass east of the cities of Red Bluff
and Chico, through Oroville and east of
Yuba City. This proposed alternative
would then shift approximately 15
miles to the west and continue
southward, just west of the Sacramento
Airport and City of West Sacramento to
the proposed substation in southern
Sacramento County.
From the proposed new substation in
southern Sacramento County, each of
three alternative corridors would
continue 40 to 45 miles southwest to a
proposed new substation near the
COTP’s existing Tracy Substation.
West Segment. The West Segment
would include two, double-circuit, 230kV transmission lines from the Tracy
area to the South San Francisco Bay
area. The first would include upgrading
the existing transmission line from the
new substation near Tracy to Silicon
Valley Power’s existing Kifer Receiving
Station (KRS) in Santa Clara.
Construction of this transmission line
would include upgrading about 13 miles
of existing, double-circuit, 230-kV
transmission line from the proposed
substation near Tracy to Western’s
Livermore Substation, and building 30
to 40 miles of new, double-circuit, 230kV transmission line from the Livermore
Substation to the proposed substation
near the KRS Substation. Up to 7 miles
of this segment may be built
underground. From the new substation
near KRS, an approximately 500-foot,
115-kV transmission tie would be built
to KRS. Two possible alternative
corridors have been identified for this
transmission line.
The second double-circuit, 230-kV
transmission line would follow a
southwesterly path from PG&E’s
existing Tesla Substation to just south of
Livermore and through the cities of
Fremont and Newark to PG&E’s existing
Newark Substation.
East Segment. This segment would
include building 40 to 45 miles of new,
double-circuit, 500-kV transmission line
east from the new substation near Tracy,
roughly paralleling Interstate 205 and
SR 120, to a proposed substation located
south of the Oakdale Airport. There are
two corridor alternatives for the
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8087
proposed 500-kV transmission line, both
of which would run north of the cities
of Tracy and Modesto and south of the
cities of Manteca, Escalon, and Oakdale.
From the new substation near the
Oakdale Airport, the East Segment
would split into two alignments: a 7- to
11-mile, double-circuit, 230-kV
transmission line would run southwest
to the Modesto Irrigation District’s
existing Parker Substation in Modesto;
and a 15-to 22-mile, double-circuit, 230kV line would run south to a proposed
new substation located just east of
Turlock. Three corridor alternatives
have been identified for each of the two,
proposed, 230-kV transmission lines.
Sierra Foothills Segment. The Sierra
Foothills Segment would be built,
owned, operated, and maintained by
Western. This Segment would include a
new, double-circuit, 230-kV
transmission line, approximately 28
miles long. It would originate at the
proposed substation near the Oakdale
Airport and trend northeast, generally
along SR 108, through the Sierra
Foothills to Western’s existing
substation at the New Melones Dam.
Alternative corridors for this segment
have not been identified at this time.
No Action Alternative
Western and TANC will also consider
the ‘‘No Action’’ alternative in the EIS/
EIR. Under the No Action Alternative,
the proposed Project would not be built.
Agency Responsibilities
To participate in the Project, Western
must comply with NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321–4347, as amended), Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations for
implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500–
1508), and DOE NEPA Implementing
Procedures (10 CFR 1021). Because the
proposed Project may involve action in
floodplains or wetlands, the EIS/EIR
will include, as applicable, a floodplain/
wetland assessment and floodplain/
wetland statement of findings following
DOE regulations for compliance with
floodplain and wetlands environmental
review (10 CFR 1022).
Western is the lead Federal agency, as
defined at 40 CFR 1501.5, for
preparation of the NEPA analysis. The
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service (USFS) and the U.S. Department
of Interior, Bureau of Land Management
(BLM) plan to be cooperating agencies
because of their jurisdiction over
proposed routing across public lands.
TANC has applied to the USFS and the
BLM for permits, which may involve
amending current forest land and
resource management plans and/or BLM
resource management plans.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8088
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Notices
Tribes and other agencies with
jurisdiction or special expertise are also
invited to be cooperating agencies. Such
tribes or agencies may make a request to
Western to be a cooperating agency by
contacting Mr. Young at the address
listed above. Designated cooperating
agencies have certain responsibilities to
support the NEPA process, as specified
at 40 CFR 1501.6(b).
TANC will be responsible for
satisfying all requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Thus, Western, TANC, and cooperating
agencies will prepare a joint EIS/EIR.
Environmental Issues
This notice is to inform agencies and
the public of the proposed Project and
solicit comments and suggestions for
consideration in preparing the EIS/EIR.
To help the public frame its comments,
this notice contains a list of potential
environmental issues that Western and
TANC have tentatively identified for
analysis. These issues include the
following:
1. Impacts on protected, threatened,
endangered, or sensitive species of
animals or plants or their critical
habitats;
2. Impacts on other biological
resources;
3. Impacts on agriculture, land use,
recreation, and transportation;
4. Impacts on floodplains and
wetlands;
5. Impacts on cultural or historic
resources and tribal values;
6. Impacts on human health and
safety;
7. Impacts on air, soil, and water
resources;
8. Visual impacts; and
9. Socioeconomic impacts and
disproportionately high and adverse
impacts to minority and low-income
populations.
This list is not intended to be allinclusive or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. Western
and TANC invite interested parties to
suggest specific issues within these
general categories, or other issues not
included above, to be considered in the
EIS/EIR.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Public Participation
Public participation and full
disclosure are planned for the entire
EIS/EIR process. The EIS/EIR process
includes public review and hearings on
the draft EIS/EIR; publication of a final
EIS/EIR; and publication of a record of
decision. The public scoping period
begins with publication of this notice in
the Federal Register and closes April
30, 2009. Western and TANC anticipate
the Draft EIS/EIR will be available in
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:31 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
early 2010, with a Final EIS/EIR
available in early 2011. A record of
decision is expected to be issued late in
2011. Persons interested in receiving
future notices, Project information,
copies of the EIS/EIR, and other
information on the NEPA review
process should contact Mr. Young.
Western and TANC will hold public
scoping meetings as follows:
1. March 26, 2009, Radisson Hotel
Sacramento, 500 Leisure Lane,
Sacramento, CA 95815.
2. March 30, 2009, Sacred Heart
Catholic Church, 507 East 4th Street,
Alturas, CA 96101.
3. March 31, 2009, Burney Lions Club,
37006 Main Street, Burney, CA 96013.
4. April 1, 2009, Hyatt Regency Santa
Clara, 5101 Great America Parkway,
Santa Clara, CA 95054.
5. April 2, 2009, On Broadway, 153
South Broadway, Turlock, CA 95380.
6. April 6, 2009, Chico Family
Masonic Center, 1110 West East
Avenue, Chico, CA 95926.
7. April 7, 2009, Jensen Hall at Lassen
County Fairgrounds, 195 Russell
Avenue, Susanville, CA 96130.
8. April 8, 2009, Clarion Inn, 1612
Sisk Road, Modesto, CA 95350.
9. April 9, 2009, Platinum Conference
Center at the Opera House, 902 Central
Avenue, Tracy, CA 95376.
10. April 13, 2009, Red Lion Hotel,
1830 Hilltop Drive, Redding, CA 96002.
11. April 14, 2009, Granzella’s Inn,
391 6th Street, Williams, CA 95987.
12. April 15, 2009, Lexington Plaza
Waterfront Hotel, 110 West Fremont
Street, Stockton, CA 95202.
Each meeting is scheduled to begin at
5:30 p.m. with an open-house format,
during which attendees are invited to
speak one-on-one with Project
representatives and agencies. At
approximately 6:30 p.m., a presentation
will be given by the Project
representatives, after which, the openhouse format will resume. The meetings
are scheduled to close no earlier than
8:30 p.m. Attendees are welcome to
come and go at their convenience
throughout the meeting.
The purpose of the scoping meetings
is to provide information about the
proposed Project, review Project maps,
answer questions, and take written
comments from interested parties. All
meeting locations are handicappedaccessible. Anyone needing special
accommodations should contact Mr.
Young to make arrangements.
The public will have the opportunity
to provide written comments at the
public scoping meetings, or send them
to Western by fax, e-mail, or U.S. Postal
Service mail. Comments may also be
submitted on-line at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
www.wapa.gov/transmission/ttp.htm.
To help define the scope of the EIS/EIR,
comments should be received by
Western no later than April 30, 2009.
Anonymous comments will not be
accepted.
Dated: February 13, 2009.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–3772 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2003–0034; FRL–8775–1]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; EPA’s Voluntary Aluminum
Industrial Partnership (VAIP)
(Renewal); EPA ICR No. 1867.04, OMB
Control No. 2060–0411
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR,
which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and
its estimated burden and cost.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before March 25, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2003–0034, to (1) EPA online
using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by e-mail to a-andr-Docket@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Docket Information Center, 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer
for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sally Rand, Climate Change Division,
Office of Atmospheric Programs (6207J),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–343–
9739; fax number: 202–343–2202; e-mail
address: rand.sally@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 34 (Monday, February 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8086-8088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3772]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Western Area Power Administration
Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of the Proposed
Transmission Agency of Northern California Transmission Project,
California
AGENCY: Western Area Power Administration, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report and conduct scoping meetings; notice of
floodplain and wetlands involvement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Western Area Power Administration (Western), an agency of
the DOE intends to prepare a joint environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report (EIS/EIR) for the construction, operation,
and maintenance of the proposed Transmission Agency of Northern
California (TANC) Transmission Project (Project) in California. Western
is issuing this Notice to inform the public and interested parties
about the proposed Project, conduct a public scoping process, and
invite the public to comment on the scope, proposed action,
alternatives, and other issues to be addressed in the EIS/EIR.
The EIS/EIR will address the construction, maintenance, and
operation of the proposed Project, which would include building and
upgrading about 600 miles of 230-kilovolt (kV) and 500-kV transmission
lines and associated equipment and facilities in northern California.
Portions of the proposed Project may affect floodplains and wetlands in
the area. Western and TANC will hold public scoping meetings in 12
locations in the Project area during the public scoping period. At the
scoping meetings, Western and TANC will share additional information on
the proposed Project and receive comments and suggestions on the scope
of the EIS/EIR.
DATES: The public scoping period begins with the publication of this
Federal Register notice and closes on April 30, 2009. Please see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for scoping meeting dates.
ADDRESSES: Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for scoping
meeting locations. Written comments on the scope of the EIS should be
addressed to Mr. David Young, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Document Manager, Western Area Power Administration, Sierra Nevada
Region, 114 Parkshore Drive, Folsom, CA 95630, telephone (916) 353-
4777, fax (916) 353-4772, or e-mail TTPEIS@wapa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Young, NEPA Document
Manager, Western Area Power Administration, Sierra Nevada Region, 114
Parkshore Drive, Folsom, CA 95630, telephone (916) 353-4777, fax (916)
353-4772, or e-mail TTPEIS@wapa.gov. Additional information and
submitted comments on the proposed project can be found at https://
www.wapa.gov/transmission/ttp.htm. For general information on DOE's
NEPA review procedures or status of a NEPA review, contact Ms. Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC-20, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20585, telephone (202) 586-4600 or (800) 472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Western, an agency within DOE, markets
Federal hydroelectric power to preference customers, as specified by
law. These customers include municipalities, cooperatives, irrigation
districts, Federal and State agencies, and Native American tribes.
Western's service territory covers 15 western states, including
California. Western owns and operates more than 17,000 miles of high-
voltage transmission lines.
TANC is a registered Transmission Owner, Transmission Planner, and
Transmission Service Provider (as these terms are defined by the North
American Electric Reliability Corporation). TANC's mission is to assist
its publicly owned utility members in providing cost-effective energy
supplies to their customers, through construction and long-term
ownership of high-voltage transmission lines within California and the
western United States. TANC's membership includes the California cities
of Alameda, Biggs, Gridley, Healdsburg, Lodi, Lompoc, Palo Alto,
Redding, Roseville, Santa Clara, and Ukiah, the Sacramento Municipal
Utility District, Modesto Irrigation District, and Turlock Irrigation
District. The Plumas-Sierra Rural Electric Cooperative is an associate
member of TANC.
Advance Notice of Intent
Western published an Advance Notice of Intent (NOI) to Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report; Notice of
Floodplain and Wetlands Involvement on January 7, 2008 (74 FR 707). The
Advance NOI provided a project description and stated that Western
would be issuing a formal NOI in early 2009 (74 FR 708). This is the
formal NOI discussed in the Advance NOI.
Background and Need for Agency Action
Western and TANC propose to coordinate development of the proposed
Project, which includes new and upgraded 230-kV and 500-kV transmission
lines, substations, and related facilities. The Project would satisfy
Western's and TANC's need to develop new access to renewable energy
resources in northeastern California, northwestern Nevada, and the
Pacific Northwest, enhance the California-Oregon Intertie, reduce
existing congestion and system losses, increase the load-carrying
capability and reliability of northern California's transmission
system, improve the reliability of the Balancing Authority Area, in
which Western resides, and relieve certain existing electrical
transmission system constraints in northern California.
Project Description
Details and plans for the proposed Project and alternatives are
still being developed and refinements will continue throughout the
public scoping process. TANC would own all facilities of the proposed
Project except for the Federal Transmission System owned by Western and
the Sierra Foothills Segment, as noted below. Western's Federal
Transmission System ownership includes the land rights, towers, and
circuit 1 between Tracy Substation and Livermore Substation. Some of
the facilities associated with the proposed Project may require
modifications to and/or interconnections with Western's transmission
system.
Proposed Routes and Alternative Routes
The proposed Project would be located entirely in California. The
corridor would consist of five segments of transmission line that
extend from northeastern California through the Central Valley and
split westward to the San Francisco Bay area and eastward to the Sierra
Foothills. The proposed corridors have been identified to avoid, to the
extent possible, residential and
[[Page 8087]]
known environmentally-sensitive areas, and take optimum advantage of
accessible competitive renewable energy zones, as recommended by the
State of California's Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative.
North Segment. The North Segment would include two, new, single-
circuit, 500-kV transmission lines, each trending west from a proposed
new substation near Ravendale to a proposed, substation near Pacific
Gas & Electric Company's (PG&E) existing Round Mountain Substation.
Three corridor alternatives, each 80 to 100 miles long, have been
identified. These three alternative corridors would be located
generally to the north of Eagle Lake and State Route (SR) 44; and near
SR 299. The North Segment would include a new, 1-mile, double-circuit,
500-kV transmission line from the proposed new substation near Round
Mountain to PG&E's Round Mountain Substation. The North Segment would
continue with a new, double-circuit, 500-kV transmission line that
would run 40 to 45 miles southwest to the California-Oregon
Transmission Project's (COTP) existing Olinda Substation, south of
Redding. Three corridor alternatives have been preliminarily identified
for this segment.
Central Segment. The Central Segment would begin at the Olinda
Substation and trend south, approximately 170 to 190 miles to Tracy. It
would include a new, double-circuit, 500-kV transmission line through
the Central Valley to a new substation in southern Sacramento County
and on to a new substation near the COTP's existing Tracy Substation.
Three possible alternative corridors have been identified for the
Central Segment: the western, central, and eastern alternatives.
The 172-mile western corridor alternative of the Central Segment
would lie along the western side of the Sacramento Valley. This
alternative would be roughly parallel to and 5 to 20 miles west of the
Interstate 5 corridor. It would pass just east of Black Butte Lake and
west of the cities of Orland, Willows, and Williams. South of Winters,
the western alternative would turn east and cross between the cities of
Dixon and Vacaville before continuing east for approximately 35 miles
to a proposed new substation in southern Sacramento County, west of SR
99 and south of Elk Grove.
The 167-mile central corridor alternative runs roughly parallel to
and 5 to 10 miles west of SR 99 through the Sacramento Valley, just
west of the cities of Red Bluff and Chico, then between the Sutter
Buttes and Yuba City, and east of the cities of Woodland and Davis. The
central alternative would then turn southeast, converging with the
western alternative, and interconnect at the proposed new substation in
southern Sacramento County.
The 173-mile eastern corridor alternative would be located west of
the Sierra Foothills of the Sacramento Valley, roughly parallel to and
5 to 10 miles east of SR 99. This alignment would pass east of the
cities of Red Bluff and Chico, through Oroville and east of Yuba City.
This proposed alternative would then shift approximately 15 miles to
the west and continue southward, just west of the Sacramento Airport
and City of West Sacramento to the proposed substation in southern
Sacramento County.
From the proposed new substation in southern Sacramento County,
each of three alternative corridors would continue 40 to 45 miles
southwest to a proposed new substation near the COTP's existing Tracy
Substation.
West Segment. The West Segment would include two, double-circuit,
230-kV transmission lines from the Tracy area to the South San
Francisco Bay area. The first would include upgrading the existing
transmission line from the new substation near Tracy to Silicon Valley
Power's existing Kifer Receiving Station (KRS) in Santa Clara.
Construction of this transmission line would include upgrading about 13
miles of existing, double-circuit, 230-kV transmission line from the
proposed substation near Tracy to Western's Livermore Substation, and
building 30 to 40 miles of new, double-circuit, 230-kV transmission
line from the Livermore Substation to the proposed substation near the
KRS Substation. Up to 7 miles of this segment may be built underground.
From the new substation near KRS, an approximately 500-foot, 115-kV
transmission tie would be built to KRS. Two possible alternative
corridors have been identified for this transmission line.
The second double-circuit, 230-kV transmission line would follow a
southwesterly path from PG&E's existing Tesla Substation to just south
of Livermore and through the cities of Fremont and Newark to PG&E's
existing Newark Substation.
East Segment. This segment would include building 40 to 45 miles of
new, double-circuit, 500-kV transmission line east from the new
substation near Tracy, roughly paralleling Interstate 205 and SR 120,
to a proposed substation located south of the Oakdale Airport. There
are two corridor alternatives for the proposed 500-kV transmission
line, both of which would run north of the cities of Tracy and Modesto
and south of the cities of Manteca, Escalon, and Oakdale. From the new
substation near the Oakdale Airport, the East Segment would split into
two alignments: a 7- to 11-mile, double-circuit, 230-kV transmission
line would run southwest to the Modesto Irrigation District's existing
Parker Substation in Modesto; and a 15-to 22-mile, double-circuit, 230-
kV line would run south to a proposed new substation located just east
of Turlock. Three corridor alternatives have been identified for each
of the two, proposed, 230-kV transmission lines.
Sierra Foothills Segment. The Sierra Foothills Segment would be
built, owned, operated, and maintained by Western. This Segment would
include a new, double-circuit, 230-kV transmission line, approximately
28 miles long. It would originate at the proposed substation near the
Oakdale Airport and trend northeast, generally along SR 108, through
the Sierra Foothills to Western's existing substation at the New
Melones Dam. Alternative corridors for this segment have not been
identified at this time.
No Action Alternative
Western and TANC will also consider the ``No Action'' alternative
in the EIS/EIR. Under the No Action Alternative, the proposed Project
would not be built.
Agency Responsibilities
To participate in the Project, Western must comply with NEPA (42
U.S.C. 4321-4347, as amended), Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508), and DOE NEPA
Implementing Procedures (10 CFR 1021). Because the proposed Project may
involve action in floodplains or wetlands, the EIS/EIR will include, as
applicable, a floodplain/wetland assessment and floodplain/wetland
statement of findings following DOE regulations for compliance with
floodplain and wetlands environmental review (10 CFR 1022).
Western is the lead Federal agency, as defined at 40 CFR 1501.5,
for preparation of the NEPA analysis. The U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service (USFS) and the U.S. Department of Interior,
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) plan to be cooperating agencies because
of their jurisdiction over proposed routing across public lands. TANC
has applied to the USFS and the BLM for permits, which may involve
amending current forest land and resource management plans and/or BLM
resource management plans.
[[Page 8088]]
Tribes and other agencies with jurisdiction or special expertise
are also invited to be cooperating agencies. Such tribes or agencies
may make a request to Western to be a cooperating agency by contacting
Mr. Young at the address listed above. Designated cooperating agencies
have certain responsibilities to support the NEPA process, as specified
at 40 CFR 1501.6(b).
TANC will be responsible for satisfying all requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act. Thus, Western, TANC, and
cooperating agencies will prepare a joint EIS/EIR.
Environmental Issues
This notice is to inform agencies and the public of the proposed
Project and solicit comments and suggestions for consideration in
preparing the EIS/EIR. To help the public frame its comments, this
notice contains a list of potential environmental issues that Western
and TANC have tentatively identified for analysis. These issues include
the following:
1. Impacts on protected, threatened, endangered, or sensitive
species of animals or plants or their critical habitats;
2. Impacts on other biological resources;
3. Impacts on agriculture, land use, recreation, and
transportation;
4. Impacts on floodplains and wetlands;
5. Impacts on cultural or historic resources and tribal values;
6. Impacts on human health and safety;
7. Impacts on air, soil, and water resources;
8. Visual impacts; and
9. Socioeconomic impacts and disproportionately high and adverse
impacts to minority and low-income populations.
This list is not intended to be all-inclusive or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. Western and TANC invite interested parties
to suggest specific issues within these general categories, or other
issues not included above, to be considered in the EIS/EIR.
Public Participation
Public participation and full disclosure are planned for the entire
EIS/EIR process. The EIS/EIR process includes public review and
hearings on the draft EIS/EIR; publication of a final EIS/EIR; and
publication of a record of decision. The public scoping period begins
with publication of this notice in the Federal Register and closes
April 30, 2009. Western and TANC anticipate the Draft EIS/EIR will be
available in early 2010, with a Final EIS/EIR available in early 2011.
A record of decision is expected to be issued late in 2011. Persons
interested in receiving future notices, Project information, copies of
the EIS/EIR, and other information on the NEPA review process should
contact Mr. Young.
Western and TANC will hold public scoping meetings as follows:
1. March 26, 2009, Radisson Hotel Sacramento, 500 Leisure Lane,
Sacramento, CA 95815.
2. March 30, 2009, Sacred Heart Catholic Church, 507 East 4th
Street, Alturas, CA 96101.
3. March 31, 2009, Burney Lions Club, 37006 Main Street, Burney, CA
96013.
4. April 1, 2009, Hyatt Regency Santa Clara, 5101 Great America
Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054.
5. April 2, 2009, On Broadway, 153 South Broadway, Turlock, CA
95380.
6. April 6, 2009, Chico Family Masonic Center, 1110 West East
Avenue, Chico, CA 95926.
7. April 7, 2009, Jensen Hall at Lassen County Fairgrounds, 195
Russell Avenue, Susanville, CA 96130.
8. April 8, 2009, Clarion Inn, 1612 Sisk Road, Modesto, CA 95350.
9. April 9, 2009, Platinum Conference Center at the Opera House,
902 Central Avenue, Tracy, CA 95376.
10. April 13, 2009, Red Lion Hotel, 1830 Hilltop Drive, Redding, CA
96002.
11. April 14, 2009, Granzella's Inn, 391 6th Street, Williams, CA
95987.
12. April 15, 2009, Lexington Plaza Waterfront Hotel, 110 West
Fremont Street, Stockton, CA 95202.
Each meeting is scheduled to begin at 5:30 p.m. with an open-house
format, during which attendees are invited to speak one-on-one with
Project representatives and agencies. At approximately 6:30 p.m., a
presentation will be given by the Project representatives, after which,
the open-house format will resume. The meetings are scheduled to close
no earlier than 8:30 p.m. Attendees are welcome to come and go at their
convenience throughout the meeting.
The purpose of the scoping meetings is to provide information about
the proposed Project, review Project maps, answer questions, and take
written comments from interested parties. All meeting locations are
handicapped-accessible. Anyone needing special accommodations should
contact Mr. Young to make arrangements.
The public will have the opportunity to provide written comments at
the public scoping meetings, or send them to Western by fax, e-mail, or
U.S. Postal Service mail. Comments may also be submitted on-line at
https://www.wapa.gov/transmission/ttp.htm. To help define the scope of
the EIS/EIR, comments should be received by Western no later than April
30, 2009. Anonymous comments will not be accepted.
Dated: February 13, 2009.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-3772 Filed 2-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P