Safety Zone; Naval Underwater Detonation; Northwest Harbor, San Clemente Island, CA, 8007-8009 [E9-3764]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia, at telephone
Number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be enforced from 7 a.m.
on March 4, 2009, to 6 p.m. on March
6, 2009.
Dated: February 4, 2009.
Patrick B. Trapp,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. E9–3769 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Regulatory Information
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0046]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Naval Underwater
Detonation; Northwest Harbor, San
Clemente Island, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of the Northwest
Harbor of San Clemente Island in
support of the Naval Underwater
Detonation. This safety zone is
necessary to ensure non-authorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by
keeping clear of the hazardous area
during the training activity. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from
February 1, 2009 through April 1, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket are part
of docket USCG–2009–0046 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
2009–0046 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and the U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N.
Harbor Dr., San Diego, CA 92101
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278–7262. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of commercial and
recreational vehicles in the vicinity of
the Naval Underwater Detonation on the
dates and times this rule will be in
effect and delay would be contrary to
the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest,
since immediate action is needed to
ensure the public’s safety. Any delay in
the effective date of this rule would
expose mariners to the dangers posed by
the detonation of underwater
explosives.
Background and Purpose
The Officer in Charge (OIC) of the
Southern California Offshore Range will
be conducting intermittent training
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8007
involving the detonation of military
grade explosives underwater throughout
February and March 2009. This safety
zone is necessary to ensure nonauthorized personnel and vessels
remain safe by keeping clear of the
hazardous area during the training
activity.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone that will be enforced from
February 1, 2009 through April 1, 2009.
The limits of the safety zone will be the
navigable waters of the Northwest
Harbor of San Clemente Island bounded
by the following coordinates: 33°02′06″
N, 118°35′36″ W; 33°02′00″ N,
118°34′36″ W; thence along San
Clemente shoreline to 33°02′06″ N,
118°35′36″ W. This safety zone is
necessary to ensure non-authorized
personnel and vessels remain safe by
keeping clear of the hazardous area
during the training activities. Persons
and vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size
and location of the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times while
training is being conducted.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
8008
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Northwest Harbor of
San Clemente Island from February 1,
2009 through August 1, 2009.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. Vessel traffic can
pass safely around the safety zone.
Although the safety zone will apply to
the harbor, traffic will be allowed to
pass through the zone with the
permission of the Coast Guard patrol
commander. Before the effective period,
the Coast Guard will issue a broadcast
notice to mariners (BNM) alerts.
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded under the Instruction
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: February 3, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9–3764 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am]
■
2. Add a new temporary § 165.T11–
148 to read as follows:
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
§ 165.T11–148 Safety Zone; Naval
Underwater Detonation; Northwest Harbor,
San Clemente Island, CA.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295; 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
POSTAL SERVICE
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include the navigable waters
of the Northwest Harbor of San
Clemente Island bounded by the
following coordinates: 33°02′06″ N,
118°35′36″ W; 33°02′00″ N, 118°34′36″
W; thence along the coast of San
Clemente Island to 33°02′06″ N,
118°35′36″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from February 1, 2009
through April 1, 2009. If the training is
concluded prior to the scheduled
termination time, the COTP will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will
announce that fact via Broadcast Notice
to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section:
designated representative, means any
Commissioned, Warrant, or Petty
Officers of the Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, or local, state, and federal
law enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
COTP; non-authorized personnel and
vessels, means any civilian boats,
fishermen, divers, and swimmers.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the COTP San Diego or his designated
representative.
(2) Non-authorized personnel and
vessels requesting permission to transit
through the safety zone may request
authorization to do so from the COTP
San Diego or his designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF–FM Channel 16, or at telephone
number (619) 278–7033.
(3) Naval units involved in the
exercise are allowed in confines of the
established safety zone.
(4) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard COTP or his designated
representative.
(5) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard or other official personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(6) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies
and the U.S. Navy.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:34 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
39 CFR Part 111
New Pricing Eligibility, Intelligent Mail,
and Move Update Standards for
Domestic Mailing Services and
Shipping Services
Postal ServiceTM.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is filing a
notice of domestic Mailing Services
(and selected Shipping Services) price
adjustments, effective in May 2009, with
the Postal Regulatory Commission. This
final rule provides revised eligibility
standards related to the new prices in
May 2009.
DATES: Effective May 11, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Chatfield, 202–268–7278.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal
Service’s final rule includes revised
eligibility standards directly related to
prices established by the USPS®
Governors. We are including a new
incentive program for Standard Mail®
saturation mailers. The final rule also
contains modifications regarding the
implementation of the full-service
Intelligent Mail® option and a revision
to Move Update standards. Additional
mail classification changes have been
proposed and were published in the
Federal Register on February 6, 2009
(74 FR 6250–6257).
We summarize revisions by shape of
mail, and then provide updates to
Intelligent Mail and Move Update,
followed by changes to the mailing
standards in Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM®).
Automation Flats
Effective May 2009, we require all
automation flats to bear barcodes that
include delivery point routing codes, as
currently required for automation
letters. We announced this change as
part of the final rule for implementation
of our Intelligent Mail program, but
reiterate it here.
Saturation Mail Volume Incentive
Program for Standard Mail
The Postal Service implements an
incentive program for saturation mailers
who increase their saturation Standard
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
8009
Mail letters or flats volume. This
increase can result from a growth in
total mailed volume or a growth in
market coverage within a defined
market. Mailers able to demonstrate an
increase in Standard Mail saturation
mailing volume from the prior year will
qualify for a per-piece credit for the
incremental volume during the program
period.
This program begins May 11, 2009
and ends May 10, 2010. If successful,
the program may be extended, on a yearby-year basis. For approved
participants, the program provides a
per-piece credit, to the participant’s
specified Centralized Account Payment
System (CAPS) account, for the verified,
incremental volume exceeding the base
volume demonstrated in the previous
year (May 11, 2008 to May 10, 2009).
Participating mailers must pay postage
through a permit imprint advance
deposit account at the time of
application and must have a functioning
CAPS account prior to the close of the
program period. Each permit imprint
advance deposit account used for the
payment of postage for saturation
mailings must be established at a postal
facility having PostalOne!® capability.
Mailers wishing to participate in the
Standard Mail saturation mail volume
incentive program must submit a letter
requesting participation to their District
Manager, Business Mail Entry (see the
postal locator link of the Postal
Explorer® at https://pe.usps.com and
click on Business Mail Entry for contact
information). Those interested in
participating must apply between
February 11, 2009 and June 11, 2009.
Requests must be completed and
submitted by an authorized official of
the business or nonprofit entity that
owns the mail. For the purposes of
participation in this program, an entity
is defined as the parent organization.
Franchisees that are not separate
business entities may not apply for the
incentive independently of the parent
organization. Printers and mailing
agents may not request participation on
behalf of customers for which they
prepare the mail. Participating mailers
must be able to demonstrate saturation
mailing activity in both the 2007 and
2008 calendar years with a minimum of
six saturation mailings in the 2008
calendar year.
Mailers who choose to participate
only within a market area, must
demonstrate volume growth within a
specific USPS sectional center facility
(SCF) service area over the program
period to qualify for the incentives. For
example, a mailer can choose to
participate for saturation mail
destinating within the Miami FL SCF,
E:\FR\FM\23FER1.SGM
23FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 34 (Monday, February 23, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8007-8009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3764]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0046]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Naval Underwater Detonation; Northwest Harbor, San
Clemente Island, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on the navigable
waters of the Northwest Harbor of San Clemente Island in support of the
Naval Underwater Detonation. This safety zone is necessary to ensure
non-authorized personnel and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of
the hazardous area during the training activity. Persons and vessels
are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) or his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from February 1, 2009 through April 1,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and materials received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket
are part of docket USCG-2009-0046 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option
on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0046 in the Docket
ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID
column. This material is also available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and the U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Dr., San Diego, CA 92101 between
8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 278-7262. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of commercial and recreational vehicles in the
vicinity of the Naval Underwater Detonation on the dates and times this
rule will be in effect and delay would be contrary to the public
interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is needed to
ensure the public's safety. Any delay in the effective date of this
rule would expose mariners to the dangers posed by the detonation of
underwater explosives.
Background and Purpose
The Officer in Charge (OIC) of the Southern California Offshore
Range will be conducting intermittent training involving the detonation
of military grade explosives underwater throughout February and March
2009. This safety zone is necessary to ensure non-authorized personnel
and vessels remain safe by keeping clear of the hazardous area during
the training activity.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced
from February 1, 2009 through April 1, 2009. The limits of the safety
zone will be the navigable waters of the Northwest Harbor of San
Clemente Island bounded by the following coordinates: 33[deg]02'06'' N,
118[deg]35'36'' W; 33[deg]02'00'' N, 118[deg]34'36'' W; thence along
San Clemente shoreline to 33[deg]02'06'' N, 118[deg]35'36'' W. This
safety zone is necessary to ensure non-authorized personnel and vessels
remain safe by keeping clear of the hazardous area during the training
activities. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the size and location of the safety zone. Recreational vessels will
not be allowed to transit through the designated safety zone during the
specified times while training is being conducted.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not
[[Page 8008]]
dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of the Northwest Harbor of San Clemente
Island from February 1, 2009 through August 1, 2009.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Vessel
traffic can pass safely around the safety zone. Although the safety
zone will apply to the harbor, traffic will be allowed to pass through
the zone with the permission of the Coast Guard patrol commander.
Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue a broadcast
notice to mariners (BNM) alerts.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
under the Instruction that there are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
[[Page 8009]]
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295; 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add a new temporary Sec. 165.T11-148 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-148 Safety Zone; Naval Underwater Detonation; Northwest
Harbor, San Clemente Island, CA.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will include the
navigable waters of the Northwest Harbor of San Clemente Island bounded
by the following coordinates: 33[deg]02'06'' N, 118[deg]35'36'' W;
33[deg]02'00'' N, 118[deg]34'36'' W; thence along the coast of San
Clemente Island to 33[deg]02'06'' N, 118[deg]35'36'' W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from February
1, 2009 through April 1, 2009. If the training is concluded prior to
the scheduled termination time, the COTP will cease enforcement of this
safety zone and will announce that fact via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
designated representative, means any Commissioned, Warrant, or Petty
Officers of the Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, or local, state,
and federal law enforcement vessels who have been authorized to act on
the behalf of the COTP; non-authorized personnel and vessels, means any
civilian boats, fishermen, divers, and swimmers.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP San
Diego or his designated representative.
(2) Non-authorized personnel and vessels requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may request authorization to do so from
the COTP San Diego or his designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16, or at telephone number (619) 278-7033.
(3) Naval units involved in the exercise are allowed in confines of
the established safety zone.
(4) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard COTP or his designated representative.
(5) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard or other official
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator
of a vessel shall proceed as directed.
(6) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies and the U.S. Navy.
Dated: February 3, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9-3764 Filed 2-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P