Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Subcommittee Meeting on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels; Revised, 8123 [E9-3753]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 34 / Monday, February 23, 2009 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Based on its review, the staff has
determined that the affected
environment and any environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action are bounded by the impacts
evaluated by the ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities’’ (NUREG–
1496) Volumes 1–3 (ML042310492,
ML042320379, and ML042330385). The
staff finds there were no significant
environmental impacts from the use of
radioactive material at the Facility. The
NRC staff reviewed the docket file
records and the final status survey
report to identify any non-radiological
hazards that may have impacted the
environment surrounding the Facility.
No such hazards or impacts to the
environment were identified. The NRC
has identified no other radiological or
non-radiological activities in the area
that could result in cumulative
environmental impacts.
The NRC staff finds that the proposed
release of the Facility for unrestricted
use and the termination of the NRC
materials license is in compliance with
10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its review,
the staff considered the impact of the
residual radioactivity at the Facility and
concluded that the proposed action will
not have a significant effect on the
quality of the human environment.
Environmental Impacts of the
Alternatives to the Proposed Action
Due to the largely administrative
nature of the proposed action, its
environmental impacts are small.
Therefore, the only alternative the staff
considered is the no-action alternative,
under which the staff would leave
things as they are by simply denying the
amendment request. This no-action
alternative is not feasible because it
conflicts with 10 CFR 30.36(d),
requiring that decommissioning of
byproduct material facilities be
completed and approved by the NRC
after licensed activities cease. The
NRC’s analysis of the Licensee’s final
status survey data confirmed that the
Facility meets the requirements of 10
CFR 20.1402 for unrestricted release.
Additionally, denying the amendment
request would result in no change in
current environmental impacts. The
environmental impacts of the proposed
action and the no-action alternative are
therefore similar, and the no-action
alternative is accordingly not further
considered.
Conclusion
The NRC staff has concluded that the
proposed action is consistent with the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:31 Feb 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
NRC’s unrestricted release criteria
specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because
the proposed action will not
significantly impact the quality of the
human environment, the NRC staff
concludes that the proposed action is
the preferred alternative.
Agencies and Persons Consulted
NRC provided a draft of this
Environmental Assessment to the
Bureau of Radiation Control, Florida
Department of Health for review on
December 2, 2008. On December 9,
2008, the Florida Bureau of Radiation
Control responded by electronic mail.
The State agreed with the conclusions of
the EA, and otherwise had no
comments.
The NRC staff has determined that the
proposed action is of a procedural
nature, and will not affect listed species
or critical habitat. Therefore, no further
consultation is required under Section 7
of the Endangered Species Act. The
NRC staff has also determined that the
proposed action is not the type of
activity that has the potential to cause
effects on historic properties. Therefore,
no further consultation is required
under Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act.
III. Finding of No Significant Impact
The NRC staff has prepared this EA in
support of the proposed action. On the
basis of this EA, the NRC finds that
there are no significant environmental
impacts from the proposed action, and
that preparation of an environmental
impact statement is not warranted.
Accordingly, the NRC has determined
that a Finding of No Significant Impact
is appropriate.
IV. Further Information
Documents related to this action,
including the application for license
amendment and supporting
documentation, are available
electronically at the NRC’s Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. From this site,
you can access the NRC’s Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS), which provides text
and image files of NRC’s public
documents. The documents related to
this action are listed below, along with
their ADAMS accession numbers.
1. NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated
NMSS Decommissioning Guidance;’’
2. Title 10 Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E,
‘‘Radiological Criteria for License
Termination;’’
3. Title 10, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 51, ‘‘Environmental
Protection Regulations for Domestic
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8123
Licensing and Related Regulatory
Functions;’’
4. NUREG–1496, ‘‘Generic
Environmental Impact Statement in
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological
Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities;’’ and
5. United States Environmental
Protection Agency letter dated
September 3, 2008 [ML082690377].
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the NRC Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. These documents
may also be viewed electronically on
the public computers located at the
NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
MD 20852. The PDR reproduction
contractor will copy documents for a
fee.
Dated at Region I, 475 Allendale Road,
King of Prussia this 10th day of February
2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
James P. Dwyer,
Chief, Commercial and R&D Branch, Division
of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
[FR Doc. E9–3750 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards (ACRS) Subcommittee
Meeting on Materials, Metallurgy &
Reactor Fuels; Revised
The ACRS Subcommittee on
Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels
scheduled for Wednesday, March 4,
2009, has been moved to the
Commission Hearing Room, 01–F16/01–
G16, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland, 20852. All other items
pertaining to this meeting remain the
same as published previously in the
Federal Register on Tuesday, February
10, 2009.
For future information contact:
Michael L. Benson, Designated Federal
Officer (Telephone: 301–415–6396)
between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. (ET) or by email Michael.Benson@nrc.gov.
Dated, February 17, 2009.
Cayetano Santos,
Branch Chief Reactor Safety Branch A,
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9–3753 Filed 2–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 34 (Monday, February 23, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 8123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3753]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) Subcommittee
Meeting on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels; Revised
The ACRS Subcommittee on Materials, Metallurgy & Reactor Fuels
scheduled for Wednesday, March 4, 2009, has been moved to the
Commission Hearing Room, 01-F16/01-G16, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland, 20852. All other items pertaining to this meeting
remain the same as published previously in the Federal Register on
Tuesday, February 10, 2009.
For future information contact: Michael L. Benson, Designated
Federal Officer (Telephone: 301-415-6396) between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.
(ET) or by e-mail Michael.Benson@nrc.gov.
Dated, February 17, 2009.
Cayetano Santos,
Branch Chief Reactor Safety Branch A, Advisory Committee on Reactor
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. E9-3753 Filed 2-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P