Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish Fishery; Scoping Process, 7880-7882 [E9-3701]

Download as PDF 7880 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 33 / Friday, February 20, 2009 / Notices increase of minimum stream flows) implemented in Clear Creek, for purposes of evaluation and adaptive management of the Clear Creek Restoration Program. Research activities associated with Project 5 may include the collection, transport and holding of fish; fish observation by stream survey, walking or wading; seining and electrofishing; fish rescues; application of anesthesia; conducting fish weight and length measurements, collection of fish scales for life history analysis; and retention of (carcass) fish heads for coded-wire extraction and/otolith analyses. Project 6 monitors adult salmon escapement at the Red Bluff Diversion Dam fish ladder for purposes of identifying fall, late-fall, winter, and spring Chinook salmon run components of adult return migration. Research activities associated with Project 6 include the trapping, collecting, holding, and handling of fish, and examination of fish for condition assessment and identification of marks. Project 7 monitors the seasonal, temporal, diel and spatial patterns of abundance of juvenile winter, spring, fall, and late-fall Chinook salmon and steelhead and green sturgeon passing RBDD in the upper Sacramento River basin; and allows for refining (model) the accuracy and precision of juvenile passage estimates. Research activities associated with Project 7 includes fish sampling by rotary screw trap, holding, and handling of juvenile salmon and steelhead for application of anesthesia, species identification, enumeration, forklength measurements, genetic analysis, marking/tagging, and release. Project 8 conducts a carcass survey on winter-run Chinook salmon from the Clear Creek confluence area to the Keswick Dam in the upper Sacramento River watershed, for purposes providing annual adult escapement estimates on winter-run Chinook salmon. Research activities associated with Project 8 include recording carcass location, collecting forklength measurements, identifying gender and origin (hatchery [absence of adipose fin] or natural), evaluation of spawning success; and water quality (temperature and clarity) measurements. Project 9 conducts research on the spawning habitat and larval drift characteristics of Southern Distinct Population Segment green sturgeon from Ord Ferry Bridge to Keswick Dam in the upper Sacramento River watershed for purposes of providing basic life history information. Research activities associated with Project 9 include determining spawning sites by sampling eggs with egg mats, and VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:55 Feb 19, 2009 Jkt 217001 sampling larval green sturgeon using a benthic D-net, fyke net, push nets, or seines, to determine temporal and spatial drift characteristics of migrating larvae. SFWO requests authorization for estimated annual take of juvenile Central Valley spring-run Chinook salmon and juvenile California Valley steelhead associated with Project 10 for five consecutive years, associated with research and monitoring activities involving visual observations (underwater observations on estimated fish numbers and forklengths, and fish utilization of riverine habitat) and physical habitat measurements (taking measurements of water depths and velocities, surveying water surface elevations and bed elevations). Project 10 conducts monitoring and research activities to assess the status of streamflows in Central Valley streams prioritized by AFRP for doubling anadromous fish production over the base period of 1967 to 1991. Project 10 will assess instream flows in Clear Creek, South Cow Creek, and Old Cow Creek in the Sacramento River watershed, and the Tuolumne River in the San Joaquin River watershed, and determine the need for recommendations on streamflowrequirements necessary to support populations of anadromous salmonids species and other game fish in said sampled streams. Dated: February 13, 2009. Angela Somma, Division Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E9–3686 Filed 2–19–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–AX70 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish Fishery; Scoping Process AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) and notice of initiation of scoping process; request for comments. SUMMARY: The New England and MidAtlantic Fishery Management Councils (Councils) announce their intent to prepare an amendment (Amendment 5) PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Monkfish (Lophius americanus) and to prepare an EIS to analyze the impacts of any proposed management measures. In general, the goals of the amendment are to bring the FMP into compliance with the new requirements of the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson Stevens Act), specifically to establish annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability measures (AMs), and to manage the fishery at long-term sustainable levels. The Councils are initiating a public process to determine the scope of alternatives to be addressed in the amendment and EIS. The purpose of this notification is to alert the interested public of the commencement of the scoping process and to provide for public participation in compliance with environmental documentation requirements. DATES: Written and electronic scoping comments must be received on or before 5 pm., local time, March 31, 2009. ADDRESSES: Written comments on Amendment 5 may be sent by any of the following methods: • E-mail to the following address: monkfish.five@noaa.gov; • Mail to Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope ‘‘Scoping Comments on Monkfish Amendment 5;’’ or • Fax to Patricia A. Kurkul, 978–281– 9135. Requests for copies of the scoping document and other information should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950, telephone 978–465–0492. The scoping document is accessible electronically via the Internet at https:// www.nefmc.org. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 978–465–0492. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The U.S. monkfish fishery is jointly managed by both Councils, with the NEFMC having the administrative lead. The Councils manage monkfish under a two-area program (northern and southern), primarily due to differences in the characteristics of the fisheries in the two areas, and no conclusive evidence exists supporting the idea that there are two biological stocks. The Councils first adopted management E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 33 / Friday, February 20, 2009 / Notices measures for the monkfish fishery in 1998, and the Monkfish FMP became effective on November 8, 1999. The Councils have modified the management program several times since the original FMP was adopted, most recently in 2007–2008 with the adoption of Framework Adjustments 4, 5, and 6. While a significant portion of the monkfish catch in both areas is incidental to other fishing activities, a directed fishery (i.e., vessels fishing under monkfish days-at-sea (DAS)) also exists which targets monkfish. The Councils currently manage the directed fishery through a combination of DAS allocations and trip limits and have adopted incidental catch possession limits for all non-directed fisheries (i.e., vessels retaining the incidental catch of monkfish while not fishing under a DAS). The basis for setting effort controls on the directed fishery is a target total allowable catch (TTAC), from which the portion expected to be caught by the incidental-catch component of the fishery is subtracted before the directed fishery portion is calculated in order to minimize discards in the incidental catch fisheries. In Framework Adjustment 4, the Councils adopted a 3-year TTAC specification for fishing years 2007 through 2009, and included a provision that those TTACs would remain in effect beyond that time if new specifications had not yet been adopted. Based on the anticipated effectiveness date of Amendment 5 (2011), the current TTACs will remain in effect under that extension provision through the 2010 fishing year (ending April 30, 2010). The TTACs are 5,000 mt and 5,100 mt for northern and southern management areas, respectively. The current allocation of DAS and the directed fishery trip limits are based on those TTACs, after accounting for the anticipated catch in incidental-catch fisheries. The reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that NMFS and the Councils establish ACLs and AMs by the year 2011 for every federally managed fishery that is not subject to overfishing, including monkfish. NMFS has published guidelines for the Councils to use in establishing ACLs, AMs, and other reference points relevant to National Standard 1, to ‘‘prevent overfishing while achieving on a continuing basis, the optimum yield from each fishery...’’ (74 FR 3178, January 16, 2009). This amendment is necessary, therefore, to update the Monkfish FMP to bring it into compliance with the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act, and to adopt VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:55 Feb 19, 2009 Jkt 217001 new multi-year TTAC specifications in a manner that is consistent with the new requirements of the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act. Measures Under Consideration The Councils will consider alternatives for setting ACLs, AMs, and other management reference points, in compliance with the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act and under the guidelines for National Standard 1. Among the reference points the Councils will adopt is the Acceptable Biological Catch (ABC), which will be based on the recommendation of the NEFMC’s Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC). The SSC will consider scientific uncertainty in the specification of ABC so that the catch will not exceed the overfishing limit. In determining the appropriate AMs, the NEFMC will consider management uncertainty such that the AMs prevent the catch from exceeding the ACL, or account for any overage in the event catches do exceed the ACL. The ACLs and AMs will serve as the basis for the management program, whether that is a continuation of the current DAS and trip limits system, or an alternative approach, such as described below. In addition to addressing the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act requirements in Amendment 5, and in response to public requests, the Councils are considering revising the management program from the current DAS and trip limits, to one based on individual transferrable quotas (ITQs) and/or one that allows for the formation of sectors in the monkfish fishery. While the Councils have stated that work on these two alternatives will commence only after development work on the other requirements is complete, it is accepting public comment during this scoping phase so that work on these alternatives can begin immediately upon completion of the primary components of the amendment. The reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act authorizes and provides a regulatory framework for Councils to establish Limited Access Privilege Programs (LAPPs), of which ITQs are one type. In addition to the requirements and standards for all LAPPs, the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act requires the NEFMC specifically to hold a referendum and gain approval of more than two thirds of the voters for an ITQ program prior to submitting the plan to NMFS. The Councils would recommend who is eligible to participate in the referendum from among the potential pool that includes permit holders and crew members who derive a significant part of their total income from the PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7881 fishery under the proposed program. If an ITQ system is adopted, the Councils would allocate individual proportions of the available catch to qualified participants who would then be allowed, under yet-unspecified terms and restrictions, to buy, sell, trade, or otherwise transfer their shares to other participants. With regards to sectors, the NEFMC has already adopted two sector management programs in the Northeast Multispecies FMP, and is considering adopting additional sectors in that fishery and in other FMPs under its authority. The NEFMC has also adopted a Sector Policy that establishes overall guidelines, requirements and restrictions that apply to all of the sector programs adopted under its individual FMPs. Under sector management programs, vessels may join together in an organized group, a‘‘sector,’’ to maximize the efficiency with which they harvest the available catch. Vessels electing to join a sector bring to the group a potential sector contribution which is an individual proportion of the total available catch for the sector species, and the vessels pool and redistribute their contribution in the manner of their choosing, subject to NMFS’ approval. Under sector management, vessels may be exempt from many, but not all of the restrictions and rules that apply to non-sector vessels. Scoping Process All persons affected by or otherwise interested in monkfish fishery management are invited to participate in determining the scope and significance of issues to be analyzed by submitting written comments (see ADDRESSES) or by attending one of the meetings where scoping comments will be taken. Scoping consists of identifying the range of actions, alternatives (including taking no action), and impacts to be considered in developing an amendment that addresses the purposes and goals discussed in this notice. Impacts may be direct, indirect, or cumulative. This scoping process will also identify and eliminate from detailed analysis issues that are not significant, as well as alternatives that do not achieve the goals of the FMP or this amendment. After the scoping process is completed, the Councils will identify the range of alternatives to be considered and analyzed in the Amendment 5 document and EIS. Once a draft amendment document, including a Draft EIS, is completed, the Councils will hold public hearings to receive comments on the alternatives and the analysis of its impacts presented in the E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1 7882 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 33 / Friday, February 20, 2009 / Notices Draft EIS. Following that public comment period, the Councils will identify their proposed action and complete a final amendment document that includes a Final EIS, as well as documentation and analysis required by all other applicable laws. The Councils will then submit the amendment to NMFS for review, approval and implementation. To meet the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act mandated implementation date of 2011, the Councils intend to submit the final amendment document in mid–2010. Scoping Hearing Schedule The Councils will discuss and take scoping comments at the following public meetings: 1. Monday, February 23, 2009, 4 p.m.; Annisquam River Marine Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Avenue, Gloucester, MA 01930, telephone: 978– 282–0308. 2. Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 10 a.m.; Hilton Garden Inn (Hillsborough Room), One Thurber Road, Warwick, RI 02886; telephone: 401–734–9600. 3. Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 7 p.m.; Holiday Inn, 151 Route 72 East, Manahawkin, NJ 08050; telephone: 609– 481–6100. 4. Friday, March 6, 2009, 1 p.m.; Maine Fishermen’s Forum, Samoset Resort, 220 Warrenton Street, Rockport, ME 04856; telephone: 207–594–2511. Special Accommodations The meetings are accessible to people with physical disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Paul J. Howard (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 days prior to this meeting date. Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Dated: February 13, 2009. Emily H. Menashes, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E9–3701 Filed 2–19–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB) Department of Energy. ACTION: Notice of open meeting. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463; 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the Federal Register. DATES: March 17–19, 2009. VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:55 Feb 19, 2009 Jkt 217001 L’Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480 L’Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Burch, STEAB Designated Federal Officer, Office of Commercialization and Project Management, Golden Field Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401, Telephone 303–275–4801. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: To make recommendations to the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy regarding goals and objectives, programmatic and administrative policies, and to otherwise carry out the Board’s responsibilities as designated in the State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act of 1990 (Pub. L. No. 101–440). Tentative Agenda: Discuss ways STEAB can support DOE’s implementation of the Economic Recovery Act, commercialization efforts for both energy efficiency and renewable energy, consider potential collaborative activities involving the State Energy offices, and update members on their routine business matters. Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Members of the public who wish to make oral statements pertaining to agenda items should contact Gary Burch at the address or telephone number listed above. Requests to make oral comments must be received five days prior to the meeting; reasonable provision will be made to include requested topic(s) on the agenda. The Chair of the Board is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available for public review and copying within 60 days on the STEAB Web site, https://www.steab.org. Issued at Washington, DC, on February 17, 2009. Rachel Samuel, Deputy Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. E9–3666 Filed 2–19–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Combined Notice of Filings #1 February 12, 2009. Take notice that the Commission received the following electric rate filings: Docket Numbers: ER99–845–015 Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc. Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status. Filed Date: 02/04/2009 Accession Number: 20090204–5162 Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 25, 2009. Docket Numbers: ER00–586–007. Applicants: Madison Gas & Electric Company. Description: Madison Gas & Electric submits Market-Based Power Sales Tariff, Second Revised Volume 4. Filed Date: 02/09/2009. Accession Number: 20090211–0198. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 2, 2009. Docket Numbers: ER00–3412–008; ER00–2687–010; ER00–816–006; ER05– 53–009; ER04–8–007; ER98–2440–007; ER98–3285–005; ER05–638–002; ER05– 1482–003. Applicants: Ameren Energy Generating Company, Ameren Energy Marketing Company, AmerenEnergy Resources Generating Company, AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen, LLC, Central Illinois Light Company, Central Illinois Public Service Company, Illinois Power Company, Union Electric Company. Description: Ameren Services Company submits a supplement to its 12/24/08 filing of an updated market power analysis. Filed Date: 02/06/2009. Accession Number: 20090210–0073. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 27, 2009. Docket Numbers: ER01–205–033; ER98–2640–031 Applicants: Xcel Energy Services Inc.; Northern States Power CompanyWisconsin. Description: NSP Companies submits a supplement to its updated market power analysis which reflects the results of the revised SIL Study. Filed Date: 02/06/2009. Accession Number: 20090210–0071. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 27, 2009. Docket Numbers: ER01–2636–005. Applicants: ALLETE, Inc. Description: Minnesota Power submits Supplemental Joint Affidavit of E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM 20FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 33 (Friday, February 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7880-7882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-AX70


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Monkfish Fishery; 
Scoping Process

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement 
(EIS) and notice of initiation of scoping process; request for 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Councils 
(Councils) announce their intent to prepare an amendment (Amendment 5) 
to the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Monkfish (Lophius americanus) 
and to prepare an EIS to analyze the impacts of any proposed management 
measures. In general, the goals of the amendment are to bring the FMP 
into compliance with the new requirements of the reauthorized Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson Stevens Act), 
specifically to establish annual catch limits (ACLs) and accountability 
measures (AMs), and to manage the fishery at long-term sustainable 
levels. The Councils are initiating a public process to determine the 
scope of alternatives to be addressed in the amendment and EIS. The 
purpose of this notification is to alert the interested public of the 
commencement of the scoping process and to provide for public 
participation in compliance with environmental documentation 
requirements.

DATES: Written and electronic scoping comments must be received on or 
before 5 pm., local time, March 31, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on Amendment 5 may be sent by any of the 
following methods:
     E-mail to the following address: monkfish.five@noaa.gov;
     Mail to Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, 
Northeast Regional Office, 55 Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 
01930. Mark the outside of the envelope ``Scoping Comments on Monkfish 
Amendment 5;'' or
     Fax to Patricia A. Kurkul, 978-281-9135.
    Requests for copies of the scoping document and other information 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England 
Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 
01950, telephone 978-465-0492. The scoping document is accessible 
electronically via the Internet at https://www.nefmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council, 978-465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The U.S. monkfish fishery is jointly managed by both Councils, with 
the NEFMC having the administrative lead. The Councils manage monkfish 
under a two-area program (northern and southern), primarily due to 
differences in the characteristics of the fisheries in the two areas, 
and no conclusive evidence exists supporting the idea that there are 
two biological stocks. The Councils first adopted management

[[Page 7881]]

measures for the monkfish fishery in 1998, and the Monkfish FMP became 
effective on November 8, 1999. The Councils have modified the 
management program several times since the original FMP was adopted, 
most recently in 2007-2008 with the adoption of Framework Adjustments 
4, 5, and 6.
    While a significant portion of the monkfish catch in both areas is 
incidental to other fishing activities, a directed fishery (i.e., 
vessels fishing under monkfish days-at-sea (DAS)) also exists which 
targets monkfish. The Councils currently manage the directed fishery 
through a combination of DAS allocations and trip limits and have 
adopted incidental catch possession limits for all non-directed 
fisheries (i.e., vessels retaining the incidental catch of monkfish 
while not fishing under a DAS). The basis for setting effort controls 
on the directed fishery is a target total allowable catch (TTAC), from 
which the portion expected to be caught by the incidental-catch 
component of the fishery is subtracted before the directed fishery 
portion is calculated in order to minimize discards in the incidental 
catch fisheries.
    In Framework Adjustment 4, the Councils adopted a 3-year TTAC 
specification for fishing years 2007 through 2009, and included a 
provision that those TTACs would remain in effect beyond that time if 
new specifications had not yet been adopted. Based on the anticipated 
effectiveness date of Amendment 5 (2011), the current TTACs will remain 
in effect under that extension provision through the 2010 fishing year 
(ending April 30, 2010). The TTACs are 5,000 mt and 5,100 mt for 
northern and southern management areas, respectively. The current 
allocation of DAS and the directed fishery trip limits are based on 
those TTACs, after accounting for the anticipated catch in incidental-
catch fisheries.
    The reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that NMFS and the 
Councils establish ACLs and AMs by the year 2011 for every federally 
managed fishery that is not subject to overfishing, including monkfish. 
NMFS has published guidelines for the Councils to use in establishing 
ACLs, AMs, and other reference points relevant to National Standard 1, 
to ``prevent overfishing while achieving on a continuing basis, the 
optimum yield from each fishery...'' (74 FR 3178, January 16, 2009). 
This amendment is necessary, therefore, to update the Monkfish FMP to 
bring it into compliance with the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act, 
and to adopt new multi-year TTAC specifications in a manner that is 
consistent with the new requirements of the reauthorized Magnuson-
Stevens Act.

Measures Under Consideration

    The Councils will consider alternatives for setting ACLs, AMs, and 
other management reference points, in compliance with the reauthorized 
Magnuson-Stevens Act and under the guidelines for National Standard 1. 
Among the reference points the Councils will adopt is the Acceptable 
Biological Catch (ABC), which will be based on the recommendation of 
the NEFMC's Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC). The SSC will 
consider scientific uncertainty in the specification of ABC so that the 
catch will not exceed the overfishing limit. In determining the 
appropriate AMs, the NEFMC will consider management uncertainty such 
that the AMs prevent the catch from exceeding the ACL, or account for 
any overage in the event catches do exceed the ACL. The ACLs and AMs 
will serve as the basis for the management program, whether that is a 
continuation of the current DAS and trip limits system, or an 
alternative approach, such as described below.
    In addition to addressing the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act 
requirements in Amendment 5, and in response to public requests, the 
Councils are considering revising the management program from the 
current DAS and trip limits, to one based on individual transferrable 
quotas (ITQs) and/or one that allows for the formation of sectors in 
the monkfish fishery. While the Councils have stated that work on these 
two alternatives will commence only after development work on the other 
requirements is complete, it is accepting public comment during this 
scoping phase so that work on these alternatives can begin immediately 
upon completion of the primary components of the amendment.
    The reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act authorizes and provides a 
regulatory framework for Councils to establish Limited Access Privilege 
Programs (LAPPs), of which ITQs are one type. In addition to the 
requirements and standards for all LAPPs, the reauthorized Magnuson-
Stevens Act requires the NEFMC specifically to hold a referendum and 
gain approval of more than two thirds of the voters for an ITQ program 
prior to submitting the plan to NMFS. The Councils would recommend who 
is eligible to participate in the referendum from among the potential 
pool that includes permit holders and crew members who derive a 
significant part of their total income from the fishery under the 
proposed program. If an ITQ system is adopted, the Councils would 
allocate individual proportions of the available catch to qualified 
participants who would then be allowed, under yet-unspecified terms and 
restrictions, to buy, sell, trade, or otherwise transfer their shares 
to other participants.
    With regards to sectors, the NEFMC has already adopted two sector 
management programs in the Northeast Multispecies FMP, and is 
considering adopting additional sectors in that fishery and in other 
FMPs under its authority. The NEFMC has also adopted a Sector Policy 
that establishes overall guidelines, requirements and restrictions that 
apply to all of the sector programs adopted under its individual FMPs. 
Under sector management programs, vessels may join together in an 
organized group, a``sector,'' to maximize the efficiency with which 
they harvest the available catch. Vessels electing to join a sector 
bring to the group a potential sector contribution which is an 
individual proportion of the total available catch for the sector 
species, and the vessels pool and redistribute their contribution in 
the manner of their choosing, subject to NMFS' approval. Under sector 
management, vessels may be exempt from many, but not all of the 
restrictions and rules that apply to non-sector vessels.

Scoping Process

    All persons affected by or otherwise interested in monkfish fishery 
management are invited to participate in determining the scope and 
significance of issues to be analyzed by submitting written comments 
(see ADDRESSES) or by attending one of the meetings where scoping 
comments will be taken. Scoping consists of identifying the range of 
actions, alternatives (including taking no action), and impacts to be 
considered in developing an amendment that addresses the purposes and 
goals discussed in this notice. Impacts may be direct, indirect, or 
cumulative. This scoping process will also identify and eliminate from 
detailed analysis issues that are not significant, as well as 
alternatives that do not achieve the goals of the FMP or this 
amendment.
    After the scoping process is completed, the Councils will identify 
the range of alternatives to be considered and analyzed in the 
Amendment 5 document and EIS. Once a draft amendment document, 
including a Draft EIS, is completed, the Councils will hold public 
hearings to receive comments on the alternatives and the analysis of 
its impacts presented in the

[[Page 7882]]

Draft EIS. Following that public comment period, the Councils will 
identify their proposed action and complete a final amendment document 
that includes a Final EIS, as well as documentation and analysis 
required by all other applicable laws. The Councils will then submit 
the amendment to NMFS for review, approval and implementation. To meet 
the reauthorized Magnuson-Stevens Act mandated implementation date of 
2011, the Councils intend to submit the final amendment document in 
mid-2010.

Scoping Hearing Schedule

    The Councils will discuss and take scoping comments at the 
following public meetings:
    1. Monday, February 23, 2009, 4 p.m.; Annisquam River Marine 
Fisheries Station, 30 Emerson Avenue, Gloucester, MA 01930, telephone: 
978-282-0308.
    2. Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 10 a.m.; Hilton Garden Inn 
(Hillsborough Room), One Thurber Road, Warwick, RI 02886; telephone: 
401-734-9600.
    3. Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 7 p.m.; Holiday Inn, 151 Route 72 East, 
Manahawkin, NJ 08050; telephone: 609-481-6100.
    4. Friday, March 6, 2009, 1 p.m.; Maine Fishermen's Forum, Samoset 
Resort, 220 Warrenton Street, Rockport, ME 04856; telephone: 207-594-
2511.

Special Accommodations

    The meetings are accessible to people with physical disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 days 
prior to this meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 13, 2009.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E9-3701 Filed 2-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.