Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80C2B5F Turbofan Engines, 7831-7833 [E9-3609]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 33 / Friday, February 20, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Pursuant
to the Commodity Promotion, Research
and Information Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C.
7411–7425) (Act), it is hereby directed
that a referendum be conducted to
ascertain whether continuance of the
Order is favored by producers of
peanuts covered under the program. The
Order is authorized under the Act.
The representative period for
establishing voter eligibility for the
referendum shall be the period from
January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2008.
Persons who are producers of peanuts
and paid assessments at the time of the
referendum and during the
representative period are eligible to
vote. Persons who received an
exemption from assessments for the
entire representative period are
ineligible to vote. The referendum shall
be conducted by mail from April 2,
2009, through April 30, 2009.
Section 518 of the Act authorizes
continuance referenda. Under section
1216.82 of the Order, the Department of
Agriculture (Department) shall conduct
a referendum every five years or when
10 percent or more of the eligible voters
petition the Secretary of Agriculture to
hold a referendum to determine if
persons subject to assessment favor
continuance of the Order. The
Department would continue the Order if
continuance of the Order is approved by
a simple majority of the producers
voting in the referendum.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), the referendum ballot has
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB NO. 0581–0093. It has
been estimated that there are
approximately 10,840 producers who
will be eligible to vote in the
referendum. It will take an average of 15
minutes for each voter to read the voting
instructions and complete the
referendum ballot.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Referendum Order
Jeanette Palmer and Sonia Jimenez,
RPB, FVP, AMS, USDA, Stop 0244,
Room 0632–S, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0244, are designated as the referendum
agents to conduct this referendum. The
referendum procedures 7 CFR 1216.100
through 1216.107, which were issued
pursuant to the Act, shall be used to
conduct the referendum.
The referendum agents will mail the
ballots to be cast in the referendum and
voting instructions to all known
producers prior to the first day of the
voting period. Persons who are
producers and paid assessments at the
time of the referendum and during the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:28 Feb 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
representative period are eligible to
vote. Persons who received an
exemption from assessments during the
entire representative period are
ineligible to vote. Any eligible producer
who does not receive a ballot should
contact the referendum agent no later
than one week before the end of the
voting period. Ballots must be received
by the referendum agent by the April 30,
2009 deadline, in order to be counted.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1216
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advertising, Consumer
information, Marketing agreements,
Peanut promotion, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7411–7425 and 7
U.S.C. 7401.
Dated: February 13, 2009.
James E. Link,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–3601 Filed 2–19–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
7831
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by April 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Part, Burlington, MA 01803;
e-mail: robert.green@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7754; fax (781) 238–7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0121; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–36–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General
Electric Company (GE) CF6–80C2B5F
Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for GE
CF6–80C2B5F turbofan engines. This
proposed AD would require removing
certain part number (P/N) high-pressure
compressor rotor (HPCR) 11–14 spool/
shafts before they exceed a new,
reduced life limit. This proposed AD
results from an internal GE audit that
compared the life limited parts
certification documentation to the
airworthiness limitations section (ALS)
of the instructions for continuing
airworthiness (ICA). We are proposing
this AD to prevent HPCR 11–14 spool/
shaft fatigue cracks caused by exceeding
the life limit, which could result in a
possible uncontained failure of the
HPCR spool/shaft and damage to the
airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2009–0121; Directorate Identifier 2008–
NE–36–AD’’ in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
7832
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 33 / Friday, February 20, 2009 / Proposed Rules
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
The ALS in the ICA for CF6–80C2
series engines incorrectly cited a cyclic
life of 20,000 cycles for the HPCR 11–
14 spool/shaft, P/N 1703M74G03,
installed in CF6–80C2B5F engines. The
certified life for this spool/shaft in CF6–
80C2B5F engines is 19,500 cycles. The
HPCR 11–14 spool/shaft, P/N
1703M74G03, wasn’t originally certified
for CF6–80C2B5F engines, but was
included in the ALS under the CF6–
80C2B5F engine model listing with a
20,000 cycle limit. When the spool/shaft
was certified for the CF6–80C2B5F, it
was certified for 19,500 cycles. GE
changed the ALS to 19,500 cycles.
Exceeding the 19,500 cycle life limit
could result in fatigue cracks starting
and growing until the spool/shaft fails.
This condition, if not corrected, could
result in possible uncontained HPCR
spool/shaft failure and damage to the
airplane.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require removing from
service CF6–80C2B5F engines with
HPCR 11–14 spool/shafts, P/N
1703M74G03, before they exceed 19,500
cycles.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect one engine installed on an
airplane of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that the proposed actions
would require no work-hours per
engine. No parts are required. Based on
these figures, we estimate there is no
cost of the proposed AD to U.S.
operators.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:28 Feb 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD. You may get a copy
of this summary at the address listed
under ADDRESSES.
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA–
2009–0121; Directorate Identifier 2008–
NE–36–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) action by April
21, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric
Company (GE) CF6–80C2B5F turbofan
engines with a high-pressure compressor
rotor (HPCR) 11–14 spool/shaft, part number
(P/N) 1703M74G03, installed. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Boeing
747 series airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from an internal GE
audit that compared the life limited parts
certification documentation to the
airworthiness limitations section (ALS) of the
instructions for continuing airworthiness
(ICA). We are issuing this AD to prevent
HPCR 11–14 spool/shaft fatigue cracks
caused by exceeding the life limit, which
could result in a possible uncontained failure
of the HPCR spool/shaft and damage to the
airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
New Reduced Life Limit for the HPCR 11–
14 Spool/Shaft
(f) Remove any CF6–80C2B5F turbofan
engine that has an HPCR 11–14 spool/shaft,
P/N 1703M74G03, before the spool/shaft
meets or exceeds the new, reduced life cycle
limit of 19,500 cycles.
Installation Prohibition
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
(g) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install any CF6–80C2B5F turbofan engine
that has an HPCR 11–14 spool/shaft, P/N
1703M74G03, that meets or exceeds 19,500
cycles.
The Proposed Amendment
Alternative Methods of Compliance
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Under the authority delegated to me
by the Administrator, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
Special Flight Permits
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
(i) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are
prohibiting special flight permits for this AD.
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(h) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(j) Contact Robert Green, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Part, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: robert.green@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7754; fax (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 33 / Friday, February 20, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
February 12, 2009.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–3609 Filed 2–19–09; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: terry.fahr@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7155; fax (781)
238–7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0113; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–25–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Hamilton
Sundstrand Propellers Model 247F
Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Hamilton Sundstrand Propellers model
247F propeller assemblies with certain
part number (P/N) and serial number
(SN) blades. This proposed AD would
require removing affected propeller
blades from service. This proposed AD
results from reports of blades with
corrosion pits in the tulip area of the
blades. We are proposing this AD to
prevent cracks from developing in the
tulip area of the blade, which could
result in separation of the blade and
possible loss of airplane control.
DATES: We must receive any comments
on this proposed AD by April 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to comment on this proposed
AD.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
You can get the service information
identified in this proposed AD from
Hamilton Sundstrand Propeller
Technical Team, One Hamilton Road,
Mail Stop 1–3–AB43, Windsor Locks,
CT 06096–1010; fax (860) 654–5107.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:28 Feb 19, 2009
Jkt 217001
7833
R817370–1, could result in corrosion
pits developing in the tulip area of the
propeller blade. This condition, if not
corrected, could cause cracks in the
tulip area, which could result in
separation of the propeller blade and
possible loss of airplane control.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written
relevant data, views, or arguments
regarding this proposal. Send your
comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2009–0113; Directorate Identifier 2008–
NE–25–AD’’ in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
We have reviewed and approved the
technical contents of Hamilton
Sundstrand Service Bulletin 247F–61–
54, Revision 1, dated January 12, 2004,
that describes procedures for reworking
and re-marking the blade with a new
P/N.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
Discussion
We have received reports of corrosion
on 6 propeller blades. A lack of
adhesive and primer beyond the end of
the compression wrap during
manufacturing of certain serialnumbered propeller blades, P/N
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Relevant Service Information
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe
condition that is likely to exist or
develop on other products of this same
type design. We are proposing this AD,
which would require removing
propeller blades, P/N R817370–1, with
a SN listed in this proposed AD, within
30 days after the effective date of this
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 25 propellers installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 128
work-hours per propeller to perform the
proposed actions, and that the average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts would cost about $50 per
propeller. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the proposed
AD to U.S. operators to be $257,250.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in subtitle VII,
part A, subpart III, section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
E:\FR\FM\20FEP1.SGM
20FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 33 (Friday, February 20, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7831-7833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3609]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0121; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-36-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) CF6-
80C2B5F Turbofan Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for GE CF6-80C2B5F turbofan engines. This proposed AD would require
removing certain part number (P/N) high-pressure compressor rotor
(HPCR) 11-14 spool/shafts before they exceed a new, reduced life limit.
This proposed AD results from an internal GE audit that compared the
life limited parts certification documentation to the airworthiness
limitations section (ALS) of the instructions for continuing
airworthiness (ICA). We are proposing this AD to prevent HPCR 11-14
spool/shaft fatigue cracks caused by exceeding the life limit, which
could result in a possible uncontained failure of the HPCR spool/shaft
and damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by April 21,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Part, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
robert.green@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7754; fax (781) 238-7199.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0121; Directorate
Identifier 2008-NE-36-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m.
[[Page 7832]]
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is the same as the
Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
Discussion
The ALS in the ICA for CF6-80C2 series engines incorrectly cited a
cyclic life of 20,000 cycles for the HPCR 11-14 spool/shaft, P/N
1703M74G03, installed in CF6-80C2B5F engines. The certified life for
this spool/shaft in CF6-80C2B5F engines is 19,500 cycles. The HPCR 11-
14 spool/shaft, P/N 1703M74G03, wasn't originally certified for CF6-
80C2B5F engines, but was included in the ALS under the CF6-80C2B5F
engine model listing with a 20,000 cycle limit. When the spool/shaft
was certified for the CF6-80C2B5F, it was certified for 19,500 cycles.
GE changed the ALS to 19,500 cycles. Exceeding the 19,500 cycle life
limit could result in fatigue cracks starting and growing until the
spool/shaft fails. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
possible uncontained HPCR spool/shaft failure and damage to the
airplane.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would require
removing from service CF6-80C2B5F engines with HPCR 11-14 spool/shafts,
P/N 1703M74G03, before they exceed 19,500 cycles.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect one engine installed
on an airplane of U.S. registry. We also estimate that the proposed
actions would require no work-hours per engine. No parts are required.
Based on these figures, we estimate there is no cost of the proposed AD
to U.S. operators.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2009-0121; Directorate
Identifier 2008-NE-36-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by April 21,
2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-80C2B5F
turbofan engines with a high-pressure compressor rotor (HPCR) 11-14
spool/shaft, part number (P/N) 1703M74G03, installed. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Boeing 747 series airplanes.
Unsafe Condition
(d) This AD results from an internal GE audit that compared the
life limited parts certification documentation to the airworthiness
limitations section (ALS) of the instructions for continuing
airworthiness (ICA). We are issuing this AD to prevent HPCR 11-14
spool/shaft fatigue cracks caused by exceeding the life limit, which
could result in a possible uncontained failure of the HPCR spool/
shaft and damage to the airplane.
Compliance
(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.
New Reduced Life Limit for the HPCR 11-14 Spool/Shaft
(f) Remove any CF6-80C2B5F turbofan engine that has an HPCR 11-
14 spool/shaft, P/N 1703M74G03, before the spool/shaft meets or
exceeds the new, reduced life cycle limit of 19,500 cycles.
Installation Prohibition
(g) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any CF6-
80C2B5F turbofan engine that has an HPCR 11-14 spool/shaft, P/N
1703M74G03, that meets or exceeds 19,500 cycles.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(h) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Special Flight Permits
(i) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are prohibiting special flight
permits for this AD.
Related Information
(j) Contact Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Part, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
robert.green@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7754; fax (781) 238-7199,
for more information about this AD.
[[Page 7833]]
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 12, 2009.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-3609 Filed 2-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P