Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: EducationUSA Advising Coordination and Support Program, 7725-7732 [E9-3533]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml) or
• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–OCC–2009–02 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2009–02. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if e-mail is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for inspection and copying in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days
between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Copies of such filings also will be
available for inspection and copying at
the principal office of OCC and on
OCC’s Web site at https://
www.optionsclearing.com/publications/
rules/proposed_changes/
sr_occ_09_02.pdf. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–OCC–
2009–02 and should be submitted on or
before March 12, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–3427 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6529]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: DS–158, Contact
Information and Work History for
Nonimmigrant, OMB Control Number
1405–0144
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments.
SUMMARY: The Department of State is
seeking Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval for the
information collection described below.
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60
days for public comment in the Federal
Register preceding submission to OMB.
We are conducting this process in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
• Title of Information Collection:
Contact Information and Work History
for Nonimmigrant.
• OMB Control Number: 1405–0144.
• Type of Request: Extension of a
Currently Approved Collection.
• Originating Office: CA/VO.
• Form Number: DS–158.
• Respondents: Nonimmigrant visa
applicants.
• Estimated Number of Respondents:
700,000.
• Estimated Number of Responses:
700,000.
• Average Hours per Response: 1
hour.
• Total Estimated Burden: 700,000
hours.
• Frequency: Once per applicant.
• Obligation to Respond: Required to
Obtain or Retain a Benefit.
DATES: The Department will accept
comments from the public up to 60 days
from February 19, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Web: Persons with access to the
internet may also view and comment on
this notice by going to the
regulations.gov Web site at https://
www.regulations.gov/index/cfm.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD–ROM
submissions): Chief, Legislation and
Regulations Division, Visa Services—
DS–160, 2401 E. Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20520–30106.
6 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7725
You must include the DS form
number (if applicable), information
collection title, and OMB control
number in any correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct requests for additional
information regarding the collection
listed in this notice, including requests
for copies of the proposed information
collection and supporting documents, to
Lauren Prosnik, Visa Services, U.S.
Department of State, 2401 E Street, NW.,
L–603, Washington, DC 20522, who may
be reached at (202) 663–2951.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are
soliciting public comments to permit
the Department to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our
functions.
• Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected.
• Minimize the reporting burden on
those who are to respond, including the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of technology.
Abstract of proposed collection:
The DS–158 is used to collect
supplemental information from students
wishing to obtain a nonimmigrant visa
to study in the United States.
Methodology:
Applicants may fill out the DS–158
online or print the page and fill it out
by hand, and submit it in person at the
time of interview.
Dated: February 6, 2009.
David T. Donahue,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–3527 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6530]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: EducationUSA Advising
Coordination and Support Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement Funding.
Opportunity Number: ECA/A/S/A–
10–03.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Program Start Date:
October 1, 2009 (pending the
availability of funds).
Application Deadline: April 24, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
7726
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
Executive Summary: The Educational
Information and Resources Branch in
the Office of Global Educational
Programs of the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces
an open competition for up to five
assistance awards to administer
components of the Office’s
EducationUSA Advising Coordination
and Support Program in Fiscal Year
2010. Public and private non-profit
organizations or consortia of eligible
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 501(c)(3) may submit proposals
to cooperate with the Bureau in the
administration of the EducationUSA
Advising Coordination and Support
Program as noted below.
To facilitate effective communication
between ECA’s Educational Information
and Resources Branch (ECA/A/S/A) and
the organizations cooperating on this
program, award recipients must have a
Washington, DC presence. Applicants
who do not currently have a
Washington, DC presence must include
in their proposals a detailed plan for
establishing such a presence by October
1, 2009. The costs related to establishing
such a presence must be borne by the
award recipient. No such costs may be
included in the budget submission in
this proposal. The award recipient must
have e-mail capability, access to Internet
resources, and the ability to exchange
data electronically with all partners
involved in the EducationUSA Advising
Coordination and Support Program.
The goal of this program is to increase
student mobility between the United
States and other countries by providing
support to EducationUSA, the network
of overseas educational advising centers
affiliated with the Department of State.
EducationUSA centers operate in a wide
variety of institutional settings around
the world, including binational
Fulbright Commissions, Public Affairs
Sections of U.S. Embassies, independent
binational centers, foreign universities,
and the overseas offices of U.S. nongovernment organizations. The support
of the Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs for these centers varies
by center and region, and ranges from
support for educational resources and
the professional development of
advising staffs to, in a limited number
of locations, direct support for office
operations. In addition, all
EducationUSA centers receive
specialized, highly tailored advice from
Bureau-supported regional and country
educational advising coordinators who
currently are based in fourteen locations
in every world region.
EducationUSA centers are catalysts
for the enrollment in U.S. colleges and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
universities of students and scholars
sponsored by the U.S. government and
by other sponsors as well as students
and scholars seeking U.S. study
opportunities independently. The
advising staffs at EducationUSA centers
provide comprehensive, balanced
advice about the complex range of
higher educational opportunities in the
United States to international students,
parents, scholars, and foreign
government officials. EducationUSA
centers also assist U.S. institutions of
higher education in their overseas
outreach efforts. In addition, the
EducationUSA network encourages
study abroad by Americans and the
development of study abroad
opportunities by U.S. universities. The
use of the EducationUSA logo is critical
to the identity of the network. More
information on the network and a
current EducationUSA center list is
located at https://
www.educationusa.state.gov.
Applicant organizations may submit
proposals for the following components
of the EducationUSA Advising
Coordination and Support Program:
Component A: Regional and Country
EducationUSA Advising Coordination
One recipient organization will
provide programmatic oversight,
maintain channels of communication,
organize professional development
opportunities and provide logistical
support and human resources services
to regional and country advising
coordinators as follows:
• Regional Educational Advising
Coordinators (REACs) based in SubSaharan Africa (two locations), Europe
and Eurasia (two or more locations),
East Asia and the Pacific (three
locations including China, North Asia
and Southeast Asia), North Africa and
the Middle East, South and Central Asia
(two or more locations, including India),
and the Western Hemisphere (three
locations, including Mexico, Brazil, and
a country on the Pacific coast of South
America). Applicant organizations may
propose specific locations within the
countries and regions specified above.
• Country Coordinators based in
Brazil, China, Indonesia, Russia, and
Vietnam. Applicant organizations may
propose specific locations within these
countries.
The recipient organization will
support the EducationUSA advising
effort through coordinated outreach and
marketing to international student
audiences, on-going communication of
substantive advice about educational
issues to EducationUSA centers, and the
innovative use of technology. The
marketing effort should be coordinated
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by a full-time marketing coordinator
whose responsibilities should include
the coordination of updated online
materials in key languages such as
Persian, Russian, Chinese, Arabic,
Spanish, French, Portuguese, Japanese,
Bahasa Indonesia and Vietnamese.
Other languages may be included based
on consultation with ECA/A/S/A. The
recipient organization will also ensure
that the coordinators prepare and
provide to the Bureau, U.S. embassies
and Fulbright commissions annual
assessments of current issues faced by
EducationUSA advising centers with
specific reference to regional trends in
student mobility. Coordinators should
also provide, for review and approval by
ECA/A/S/A, periodic recommendations
of reference materials, equipment, and
professional development opportunities
to meet the needs of EducationUSA
centers and their advising staffs in the
coordinators’ countries or regions of
responsibility. Additional information
about Component A is provided in the
Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI).
Component B: EducationUSA Center
Advising Support
One or more recipient organizations
will provide operational support to
EducationUSA advising centers in the
following regions:
(1) Eurasia/Central Asia (Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova,
Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and
Ukraine).
(2) Middle East/North Africa (Egypt,
Gaza, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon,
Morocco, Oman, Syria, Tunisia, West
Bank, and Yemen).
(3) East Asia (China, Mongolia,
Vietnam).
(4) Western Hemisphere (Guatemala,
Mexico).
Although educational advising
centers belonging to the EducationUSA
network in countries and regions not
listed above may not receive direct
operational support from the Bureau
under Component B of this program, all
EducationUSA advising centers
worldwide will be eligible for support
from the Bureau for professional
development, reference materials,
equipment, outreach efforts, and
coordinator support through Component
A and other mechanisms.
In addition, support for
EducationUSA centers in Eurasia/
Central Asia and the Middle East/North
Africa includes administrative and
program support for a program of
Opportunity Scholarships. This program
provides support to well qualified
international students of limited
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
financial means to cover the up-front
costs of applying for admission and
financial aid, as well as the costs of
visas and international travel. Proposals
should address how the organization
will engage educational advisers in the
identification of candidates and how the
administrative efforts in the affected
advising centers will give priority to this
initiative.
Proposals for the Middle East/North
Africa may include requests for support
for online outreach to Iranians in
English and Persian.
Additional information about
Component B, including a list of
countries in which EducationUSA
Centers are currently eligible to
participate in the Opportunity
scholarships program, is provided in the
Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: To facilitate and increase the
flow of international students to the
U.S. in an effort to deepen and expand
understanding of U.S. society, culture,
and values in other countries, and to
expand the understanding of foreign
cultures and societies by Americans
through the increased participation of
U.S. students in academically sound
study abroad programs in a widening
range of international locations,
especially in non-traditional study
abroad destinations. The work of
EducationUSA centers is critical to the
Bureau’s pursuit of these objectives.
Additional Guidelines
Applicant organizations must submit
separate proposals with budgets and
narratives outlining a comprehensive
strategy for the administration and
implementation of each program
component for which they are applying:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
Component A: Regional and Country
EducationUSA Advising Coordination;
Component B: EducationUSA Center
Advising Support (in one or more of
four specified regions—Eurasia/Central
Asia, Middle East/North Africa, East
Asia, and the Western Hemisphere).
Organizations may apply for either or
both components of the program and for
one or more regions under Component
B. Organizations submitting proposals
under Component B for more than one
region should submit one proposal for
each region proposed. Each proposal
submitted for this competition should
reflect a vision that includes innovative
ideas and recommendations.
The narrative portion of the proposal
for each program component should not
exceed 20 pages. Proposals may utilize
appendices to illustrate elements of the
narrative. Applicants must also provide
a separate administrative and program
budget for each program component.
Where possible, proposals for more than
one component or for more than one
region under Component B should
reflect economies of scale and
demonstrate administrative efficiencies.
Please refer to the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI) for
further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement(s). In a cooperative
agreement, the Bureau is substantially
involved in program activities above
and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/A/
S/A activities and responsibilities for
this program are to:
• Participate in staff selection, review
staffing requirements, travel plans,
budgets, and policy guidance and
direction;
• Maintain direct role in monitoring
coordinators’ relationships with
advisers, Public Affairs Sections, ECA
offices, U.S. universities and other
organizations;
• Assist, where necessary and
possible, with requirements for
coordinator access to U.S. embassies.
Where possible, arrange for APO or
pouch privileges for coordinators to
facilitate receipt of educational
materials;
• Consult coordinators on the
development of annual regional
strategic plans; approve travel plans,
adviser travel grants, professional
development, workshops, venues,
agendas; consult regarding substantive
advising issues;
• Assist with meetings of regional
and country coordinators;
• Meet with coordinators on other
occasions as necessary;
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7727
• Work with Public Affairs sections at
U.S. embassies and consulates to
oversee and evaluate the quality of
advising services and to identify
appropriate center locations;
• Review for approval requests for
funding for reference materials,
workshops, and outreach.
The amount that will be available for
this program in FY2010 resources
cannot be determined until FY2010
funds are appropriated. However, for
planning purposes applicant
organizations may submit budgets in
this competition in the amounts noted
below.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2010
Approximate Total Funding:
Approximately $7,900,000, pending
availability of FY2010 funds.
Component A: Regional and Country
EducationUSA Advising Coordination—
approximately $4,300,000.
Component B: EducationUSA
Advising Support:
a. Eurasia/Central Asia—
approximately $1,700,000.
b. Middle East/North Africa—
approximately $800,000.
c. East Asia—up to approximately
$1,000,000.
d. Western Hemisphere—
approximately $100,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: At
least two, not more than five.
Approximate Average Award: Not
Applicable.
Floor of Award Range: approximately
$100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range:
approximately $4,300,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, October 1, 2009.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew cooperative agreements
issued in response to this solicitation for
up to two additional fiscal years, before
openly competing the programs again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
7728
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
(a.) Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
experience in conducting international
exchanges be limited to $60,000 in
Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
making between two and five awards, in
amounts over $60,000 to support
program and administrative costs
required to implement this exchange
program. Therefore, organizations with
less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this
competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Office of Global Educational
Programs, ECA/A/S/A, Room 349, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
telephone: 202–453–8866, fax number:
202–453–8890, e-mail:
MoraDD@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
S//A–10–03 located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request. Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Dorothy Mora, Program
Officer, and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/S/A–10–
03 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/
open2.html, or from the Grants.gov Web
site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call
1–866–705–5711. Please ensure that
your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
Please note: Effective January 7, 2009,
all applicants for ECA federal assistance
awards must include in their
application the names of directors and/
or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless
of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants
must submit information in one of the
following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue
Service Form 990, ‘‘Return of
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Organization Exempt From Income
Tax,’’ must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form
990 must submit information above in
the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting
requirements, award recipients will also
be required to submit a one-page
document, derived from their program
reports, listing and describing their
grant activities. For award recipients,
the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees,
and key employees), as well as the onepage description of grant activities, will
be transmitted by the State Department
to OMB, along with other information
required by the Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA), and will be made available to
the public by the Office of Management
and Budget on its USASpending.gov
Web site as part of ECA’s FFATA
reporting requirements.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: For applicants’
information only, the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs places
critically important emphases on the
security and proper administration of
the Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs
and adherence by award recipients and
sponsors to all regulations governing the
J visa. Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements. The award recipient
will be responsible for issuing DS–2019
forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation: Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
recipient organization will track
participants or partners and be able to
respond to key evaluation questions,
including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program,
changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on
institutions (institutions in which
participants work or partner
institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure
gains in mutual understanding as well
as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it: (1) Specifies
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7729
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be
required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau
in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e.
sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other requirements
etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF–
424A—‘‘Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs’’ along with a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification. Indirect costs
may not be charged against participant
program costs.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) REAC manager, Regional and
Country Coordinator, and Marketing/
Technology Coordinator salaries,
benefits, health insurance, retirement;
(2) Costs for coordinator professional
development and for facilitating
communication and information flow
among coordinators and with advising
centers;
(3) Part-time assistant salaries;
(4) Coordinator travel;
(5) Logistical support and equipment;
(6) Cost of organizing regional adviser
professional development programs;
(7) Advising center staff salaries and
benefits;
(8) Reference materials, computer
equipment for centers and coordinators;
(9) Office supplies and expenses,
including rent, communications,
postage and shipping;
(10) Outreach, publicity, and special
projects costs;
(11) Indirect costs. Indirect costs may
not be charged against participant
program costs.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
7730
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Friday,
April 24, 2009.
Reference Number: ECA/A/S/A–10–
03.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and eight copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/A/S/A–10–03, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on
a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Sections at
the U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘‘Get Started’’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your Internet connection.
In addition, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend
that you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes
extensive information on all phases/
aspects of the Grants.gov process,
including an extensive section on
frequently asked questions, located
under the ‘‘For Applicants’’ section of
the Web site. ECA strongly recommends
that all potential applicants review
thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site,
well in advance of submitting a
proposal through the Grants.gov system.
ECA bears no responsibility for data
errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support,
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726,
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail:
support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web
site, for definitions of various
‘‘application statuses’’ and the
difference between a submission receipt
and a submission validation.
Applicants will receive a validation email from grants.gov upon the
successful submission of an application.
Again, validation of an electronic
submission via Grants.gov can take up
to two business days. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Optional—IV.3f.3 You may also state
here any limitations on the number of
applications that an applicant may
submit and make it clear whether the
limitation is on the submitting
organization, individual program
director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will
review all proposals for technical
eligibility. Proposals will be deemed
ineligible if they do not fully adhere to
the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
1. Quality of the program idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Program planning/Ability to
achieve program objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan
should adhere to the program overview
and guidelines described above.
Objectives should be reasonable,
feasible, and flexible. Proposals should
clearly demonstrate how the institution
will meet the program’s objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
5. Institutional Capacity/Institution’s
Record/Ability: Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be
adequate and appropriate to achieve the
program or project’s goals. Proposals
should demonstrate an institutional
record of successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal
management and full compliance with
all reporting requirements for past
Bureau awards (grants or cooperative
agreements) as determined by Bureau
Grants Staff. The Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients
and the demonstrated potential of new
applicants.
6. Follow-on Activities: Proposals
should provide a plan for continued
follow-on activity (without Bureau
support) ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
7. Project Evaluation: Proposals
should include a plan to evaluate the
activity’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program. A
draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a
methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is
recommended.
8. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead
and administrative components of the
proposal, including salaries and
honoraria, should be kept as low as
possible. All other items should be
necessary and appropriate. Proposals
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
7731
should maximize cost-sharing through
other private sector support as well as
institutional direct funding
contributions.
relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements
or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Federal Assistance Award
(FAA) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The FAA and the original proposal with
subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing
document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be
signed by an authorized Grants Officer,
and mailed to the recipient’s
responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional
requirements apply to this project:
For assistance awards involving Iran:
A critical component of current U.S.
government Iran policy is the support
for indigenous Iranian voices. The State
Department has made the awarding of
grants for this purpose a key component
of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of
Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has
requested the Department of State to
follow certain procedures to effectuate
the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571,
582, and 635(b) of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18
U.S.C. 2339A and 2339B; Executive
Order 13224; and Homeland Security
Presidential Directive 6. These licensing
conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran
grantees and sub-grantees for counterterrorism purposes. To conduct this
vetting the Department will collect
information from grantees and subgrantees regarding the identity and
background of their key employees and
Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of the Palestinian Authority
complies with requirements, please contact
ECA/A/S/A Program Officer Amy Forest,
202–453–8866, e-mail: ForestAL@state.gov,
for additional information.
Note: To assure that planning for the
inclusion of Iran complies with
requirements, please contact ECA/A/S/A
Program Officer Bahareh Moradi, 202–453–
8885, e-mail: MoradiBX@state.gov for
additional information.
For assistance awards involving the
Palestinian Authority, West Bank, and
Gaza: All awards made under this
competition must be executed according
to all relevant U.S. laws and policies
regarding assistance to the Palestinian
Authority, and to the West Bank and
Gaza. Organizations must consult with
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments.’’
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following
reports:
(1) A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program
report summarizing program outcomes
no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award. This one-page
report will be transmitted to OMB, and
be made available to the public via
OMB’s USAspending.gov Web site—as
part of ECA’s Federal Funding
Accountability and Transparency Act
(FFATA) reporting requirements.
(3) A SF–PPR, ‘‘Performance Progress
Report’’ Cover Sheet with all program
reports.
(4) Semi-annual financial reports
which should show the actual amounts
generated and that these funds are
applied to support advising services. All
such income must be enumerated on
Financial Status Report ‘‘Long Form
269.’’ Program reports should also show
how using such income reinforces the
goals and objectives of this grant.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
7732
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 32 / Thursday, February 19, 2009 / Notices
Award recipients will be required to
provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in
their regular program reports. (Please
refer to IV. Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Dorothy Mora,
Educational Information and Resources
Branch, ECA/A/S/A, Room 349, ECA/A/
S/A–10–03, U.S. Department of State,
SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, phone: 202–
453–8868, fax: 202–453–8890, e-mail:
MoraDD@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/S/A–
10–03. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notice: The terms and conditions
published in this RFGP are binding and
may not be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: February 10, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational
and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–3533 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:38 Feb 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
Dated: February 3, 2009.
Marc Susser,
Executive Secretary, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–3524 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6493]
Advisory Committee on Historical
Diplomatic Documentation; Notice of
Meeting
BILLING CODE 4710–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
The Advisory Committee on
Historical Diplomatic Documentation
will meet in the Department of State,
2201 ‘‘C’’ Street, NW., Washington, DC,
March 2–3, 2009, in Conference Room
1207. Prior notification and a valid
government-issued photo ID (such as
driver’s license, passport, U. S.
government or military ID) are required
for entrance into the building. Members
of the public planning to attend must
notify Nathaniel Smith, Office of the
Historian (202–663–3268) no later than
February 25, 2009, to provide date of
birth, valid government-issued photo
identification number and type (such as
driver’s license number/state, passport
number/country, or U.S. government ID
number/agency or military ID number/
branch), and relevant telephone
numbers. If you cannot provide one of
the enumerated forms of ID, please
consult with Nathaniel Smith for
acceptable alternative forms of picture
identification.
The Committee will meet in open
session from 1:30 p.m. through 2:30
p.m. on Monday, March 2, 2009, in the
Department of State, 2201 ‘‘C’’ Street,
NW., Washington, DC, in Conference
Room 1207, to discuss declassification
and transfer of Department of State
records to the National Archives and
Records Administration and the status
of the Foreign Relations series. The
remainder of the Committee’s sessions
from 2:45 p.m. until 5 p.m. on Monday,
March 2, 2009, and 9 a.m. until 12 p.m.
on Tuesday, March 3, 2008, in
Conference Room 1207 will be closed in
accordance with Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463). The agenda calls for
discussions of agency declassification
decisions concerning the Foreign
Relations series and other
declassification issues. These are
matters not subject to public disclosure
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and the public
interest requires that such activities be
withheld from disclosure.
Questions concerning the meeting
should be directed to Marc J. Susser,
Executive Secretary, Advisory
Committee on Historical Diplomatic
Documentation, Department of State,
Office of the Historian, Washington, DC
20520, telephone (202) 663–1123 (email history@state.gov).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Public Notice 6513]
Industry Advisory Panel: Notice of
Open Meeting
The Industry Advisory Panel of
Overseas Buildings Operations will
meet on Tuesday, March 3, 2009 from
9:30 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time. The meeting will be
held in room 1107 of the U.S.
Department of State, located at 2201 C
Street NW. (entrance on 23rd Street)
Washington, DC. For logistical and
security reasons, it is imperative that
everyone enter and exit using only the
23rd Street entrance. The majority of the
meeting is devoted to an exchange of
ideas between the Department’s Bureau
of Overseas Buildings Operations’
senior management and the panel
members, on design, operations, and
building maintenance. Members of the
public are asked to kindly refrain from
joining the discussion until Director
Shinnick opens the discussion to them.
Entry to the building is controlled; to
obtain pre-clearance for entry, members
of the public planning to attend should
provide, by February 20, 2009, their
name, professional affiliation, date of
birth, citizenship, and a valid
government-issued ID number (i.e., U.S.
government ID, U.S. military ID,
passport, or drivers license with state)
by e-mailing: iapr@state.gov. Because of
space restrictions, we request that
companies interested in attending send
only one representative.
If you have any questions, please
contact Andrea Walk at
walkam@state.gov or on (703) 516–1544.
February 6, 2009.
Richard J. Shinnick,
Director, ad interim, Overseas Building
Operations, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–3529 Filed 2–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6514]
Announcement of A Meeting of the
International Telecommunication
Advisory Committee
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
meeting of the International
Telecommunication Advisory
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 32 (Thursday, February 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7725-7732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3533]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 6530]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: EducationUSA Advising Coordination and Support Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement Funding.
Opportunity Number: ECA/A/S/A-10-03.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Program Start Date: October 1, 2009 (pending the
availability of funds).
Application Deadline: April 24, 2009.
[[Page 7726]]
Executive Summary: The Educational Information and Resources Branch
in the Office of Global Educational Programs of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) announces an open competition
for up to five assistance awards to administer components of the
Office's EducationUSA Advising Coordination and Support Program in
Fiscal Year 2010. Public and private non-profit organizations or
consortia of eligible organizations meeting the provisions described in
Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) may submit proposals to
cooperate with the Bureau in the administration of the EducationUSA
Advising Coordination and Support Program as noted below.
To facilitate effective communication between ECA's Educational
Information and Resources Branch (ECA/A/S/A) and the organizations
cooperating on this program, award recipients must have a Washington,
DC presence. Applicants who do not currently have a Washington, DC
presence must include in their proposals a detailed plan for
establishing such a presence by October 1, 2009. The costs related to
establishing such a presence must be borne by the award recipient. No
such costs may be included in the budget submission in this proposal.
The award recipient must have e-mail capability, access to Internet
resources, and the ability to exchange data electronically with all
partners involved in the EducationUSA Advising Coordination and Support
Program.
The goal of this program is to increase student mobility between
the United States and other countries by providing support to
EducationUSA, the network of overseas educational advising centers
affiliated with the Department of State. EducationUSA centers operate
in a wide variety of institutional settings around the world, including
binational Fulbright Commissions, Public Affairs Sections of U.S.
Embassies, independent binational centers, foreign universities, and
the overseas offices of U.S. non-government organizations. The support
of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs for these centers
varies by center and region, and ranges from support for educational
resources and the professional development of advising staffs to, in a
limited number of locations, direct support for office operations. In
addition, all EducationUSA centers receive specialized, highly tailored
advice from Bureau-supported regional and country educational advising
coordinators who currently are based in fourteen locations in every
world region.
EducationUSA centers are catalysts for the enrollment in U.S.
colleges and universities of students and scholars sponsored by the
U.S. government and by other sponsors as well as students and scholars
seeking U.S. study opportunities independently. The advising staffs at
EducationUSA centers provide comprehensive, balanced advice about the
complex range of higher educational opportunities in the United States
to international students, parents, scholars, and foreign government
officials. EducationUSA centers also assist U.S. institutions of higher
education in their overseas outreach efforts. In addition, the
EducationUSA network encourages study abroad by Americans and the
development of study abroad opportunities by U.S. universities. The use
of the EducationUSA logo is critical to the identity of the network.
More information on the network and a current EducationUSA center list
is located at https://www.educationusa.state.gov.
Applicant organizations may submit proposals for the following
components of the EducationUSA Advising Coordination and Support
Program:
Component A: Regional and Country EducationUSA Advising Coordination
One recipient organization will provide programmatic oversight,
maintain channels of communication, organize professional development
opportunities and provide logistical support and human resources
services to regional and country advising coordinators as follows:
Regional Educational Advising Coordinators (REACs) based
in Sub-Saharan Africa (two locations), Europe and Eurasia (two or more
locations), East Asia and the Pacific (three locations including China,
North Asia and Southeast Asia), North Africa and the Middle East, South
and Central Asia (two or more locations, including India), and the
Western Hemisphere (three locations, including Mexico, Brazil, and a
country on the Pacific coast of South America). Applicant organizations
may propose specific locations within the countries and regions
specified above.
Country Coordinators based in Brazil, China, Indonesia,
Russia, and Vietnam. Applicant organizations may propose specific
locations within these countries.
The recipient organization will support the EducationUSA advising
effort through coordinated outreach and marketing to international
student audiences, on-going communication of substantive advice about
educational issues to EducationUSA centers, and the innovative use of
technology. The marketing effort should be coordinated by a full-time
marketing coordinator whose responsibilities should include the
coordination of updated online materials in key languages such as
Persian, Russian, Chinese, Arabic, Spanish, French, Portuguese,
Japanese, Bahasa Indonesia and Vietnamese. Other languages may be
included based on consultation with ECA/A/S/A. The recipient
organization will also ensure that the coordinators prepare and provide
to the Bureau, U.S. embassies and Fulbright commissions annual
assessments of current issues faced by EducationUSA advising centers
with specific reference to regional trends in student mobility.
Coordinators should also provide, for review and approval by ECA/A/S/A,
periodic recommendations of reference materials, equipment, and
professional development opportunities to meet the needs of
EducationUSA centers and their advising staffs in the coordinators'
countries or regions of responsibility. Additional information about
Component A is provided in the Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI).
Component B: EducationUSA Center Advising Support
One or more recipient organizations will provide operational
support to EducationUSA advising centers in the following regions:
(1) Eurasia/Central Asia (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia,
Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and
Ukraine).
(2) Middle East/North Africa (Egypt, Gaza, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon,
Morocco, Oman, Syria, Tunisia, West Bank, and Yemen).
(3) East Asia (China, Mongolia, Vietnam).
(4) Western Hemisphere (Guatemala, Mexico).
Although educational advising centers belonging to the EducationUSA
network in countries and regions not listed above may not receive
direct operational support from the Bureau under Component B of this
program, all EducationUSA advising centers worldwide will be eligible
for support from the Bureau for professional development, reference
materials, equipment, outreach efforts, and coordinator support through
Component A and other mechanisms.
In addition, support for EducationUSA centers in Eurasia/Central
Asia and the Middle East/North Africa includes administrative and
program support for a program of Opportunity Scholarships. This program
provides support to well qualified international students of limited
[[Page 7727]]
financial means to cover the up-front costs of applying for admission
and financial aid, as well as the costs of visas and international
travel. Proposals should address how the organization will engage
educational advisers in the identification of candidates and how the
administrative efforts in the affected advising centers will give
priority to this initiative.
Proposals for the Middle East/North Africa may include requests for
support for online outreach to Iranians in English and Persian.
Additional information about Component B, including a list of
countries in which EducationUSA Centers are currently eligible to
participate in the Opportunity scholarships program, is provided in the
Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI).
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: To facilitate and increase the flow of international
students to the U.S. in an effort to deepen and expand understanding of
U.S. society, culture, and values in other countries, and to expand the
understanding of foreign cultures and societies by Americans through
the increased participation of U.S. students in academically sound
study abroad programs in a widening range of international locations,
especially in non-traditional study abroad destinations. The work of
EducationUSA centers is critical to the Bureau's pursuit of these
objectives.
Additional Guidelines
Applicant organizations must submit separate proposals with budgets
and narratives outlining a comprehensive strategy for the
administration and implementation of each program component for which
they are applying:
Component A: Regional and Country EducationUSA Advising
Coordination;
Component B: EducationUSA Center Advising Support (in one or more
of four specified regions--Eurasia/Central Asia, Middle East/North
Africa, East Asia, and the Western Hemisphere).
Organizations may apply for either or both components of the
program and for one or more regions under Component B. Organizations
submitting proposals under Component B for more than one region should
submit one proposal for each region proposed. Each proposal submitted
for this competition should reflect a vision that includes innovative
ideas and recommendations.
The narrative portion of the proposal for each program component
should not exceed 20 pages. Proposals may utilize appendices to
illustrate elements of the narrative. Applicants must also provide a
separate administrative and program budget for each program component.
Where possible, proposals for more than one component or for more than
one region under Component B should reflect economies of scale and
demonstrate administrative efficiencies.
Please refer to the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) for further information.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement(s). In a cooperative
agreement, the Bureau is substantially involved in program activities
above and beyond routine monitoring. ECA/A/S/A activities and
responsibilities for this program are to:
Participate in staff selection, review staffing
requirements, travel plans, budgets, and policy guidance and direction;
Maintain direct role in monitoring coordinators'
relationships with advisers, Public Affairs Sections, ECA offices, U.S.
universities and other organizations;
Assist, where necessary and possible, with requirements
for coordinator access to U.S. embassies. Where possible, arrange for
APO or pouch privileges for coordinators to facilitate receipt of
educational materials;
Consult coordinators on the development of annual regional
strategic plans; approve travel plans, adviser travel grants,
professional development, workshops, venues, agendas; consult regarding
substantive advising issues;
Assist with meetings of regional and country coordinators;
Meet with coordinators on other occasions as necessary;
Work with Public Affairs sections at U.S. embassies and
consulates to oversee and evaluate the quality of advising services and
to identify appropriate center locations;
Review for approval requests for funding for reference
materials, workshops, and outreach.
The amount that will be available for this program in FY2010
resources cannot be determined until FY2010 funds are appropriated.
However, for planning purposes applicant organizations may submit
budgets in this competition in the amounts noted below.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2010
Approximate Total Funding: Approximately $7,900,000, pending
availability of FY2010 funds.
Component A: Regional and Country EducationUSA Advising
Coordination--approximately $4,300,000.
Component B: EducationUSA Advising Support:
a. Eurasia/Central Asia--approximately $1,700,000.
b. Middle East/North Africa--approximately $800,000.
c. East Asia--up to approximately $1,000,000.
d. Western Hemisphere--approximately $100,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: At least two, not more than five.
Approximate Average Award: Not Applicable.
Floor of Award Range: approximately $100,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: approximately $4,300,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, October 1,
2009.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew cooperative agreements issued in response to this
solicitation for up to two additional fiscal years, before openly
competing the programs again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
[[Page 7728]]
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved agreement. Cost sharing may
be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements: (a.) Bureau grant guidelines
require that organizations with less than four years experience in
conducting international exchanges be limited to $60,000 in Bureau
funding. ECA anticipates making between two and five awards, in amounts
over $60,000 to support program and administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in
support of its programs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Office of Global Educational Programs, ECA/A/S/A, Room 349,
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, telephone: 202-453-8866, fax number: 202-453-8890, e-mail:
MoraDD@state.gov to request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/S//A-10-03 located at the top of this
announcement when making your request. Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained from grants.gov. Please see section
IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Dorothy Mora, Program Officer, and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/S/A-10-03 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/grants/open2.html, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. Please note: Effective January 7, 2009, all applicants for
ECA federal assistance awards must include in their application the
names of directors and/or senior executives (current officers,
trustees, and key employees, regardless of amount of compensation). In
fulfilling this requirement, applicants must submit information in one
of the following ways:
(1) Those who file Internal Revenue Service Form 990, ``Return of
Organization Exempt From Income Tax,'' must include a copy of relevant
portions of this form.
(2) Those who do not file IRS Form 990 must submit information
above in the format of their choice.
In addition to final program reporting requirements, award
recipients will also be required to submit a one-page document, derived
from their program reports, listing and describing their grant
activities. For award recipients, the names of directors and/or senior
executives (current officers, trustees, and key employees), as well as
the one-page description of grant activities, will be transmitted by
the State Department to OMB, along with other information required by
the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA), and
will be made available to the public by the Office of Management and
Budget on its USASpending.gov Web site as part of ECA's FFATA reporting
requirements.
If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not received
a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three years, or
if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS within the
past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation to verify
nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to do so will
cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence To All Regulations Governing the J Visa: For
applicants' information only, the Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs places critically important emphases on the security and proper
administration of the Exchange Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by award recipients and sponsors to all regulations governing the J
visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the applicant's capacity
to meet all requirements governing the administration of the Exchange
Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62, including the oversight of
Responsible Officers and Alternate Responsible Officers, screening and
selection of program participants, provision of pre-arrival information
and orientation to participants, monitoring of participants, proper
maintenance and security of forms, record-keeping, reporting and other
requirements. The award recipient will be responsible for issuing DS-
2019 forms to participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of
[[Page 7729]]
State, Office of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-
44, Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203-5029, FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines: Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation: Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the recipient
organization will track participants or partners and be able to respond
to key evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it: (1) Specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Recipient organizations will be required to provide reports
analyzing their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected, including survey responses and
contact information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years
and provided to the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e. sustainability, overall
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any
other requirements etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit SF-424A--``Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs'' along with a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification. Indirect costs may not
be charged against participant program costs.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) REAC manager, Regional and Country Coordinator, and Marketing/
Technology Coordinator salaries, benefits, health insurance,
retirement;
(2) Costs for coordinator professional development and for
facilitating communication and information flow among coordinators and
with advising centers;
(3) Part-time assistant salaries;
(4) Coordinator travel;
(5) Logistical support and equipment;
(6) Cost of organizing regional adviser professional development
programs;
(7) Advising center staff salaries and benefits;
(8) Reference materials, computer equipment for centers and
coordinators;
(9) Office supplies and expenses, including rent, communications,
postage and shipping;
(10) Outreach, publicity, and special projects costs;
(11) Indirect costs. Indirect costs may not be charged against
participant program costs.
[[Page 7730]]
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Friday, April 24, 2009.
Reference Number: ECA/A/S/A-10-03.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1.) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2.) Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications: Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/S/A-10-03, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room
534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) or Microsoft Word format on a PC-formatted
disk. The Bureau will provide these files electronically to the
appropriate Public Affairs Sections at the U.S. embassies for their
review.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications: Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the ``Get Started'' portion of the site
(https://www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. In
addition, validation of an electronic submission via Grants.gov can
take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
The Grants.gov Web site includes extensive information on all
phases/aspects of the Grants.gov process, including an extensive
section on frequently asked questions, located under the ``For
Applicants'' section of the Web site. ECA strongly recommends that all
potential applicants review thoroughly the Grants.gov Web site, well in
advance of submitting a proposal through the Grants.gov system. ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726, Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, E-
mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Please refer to the Grants.gov Web site, for definitions of various
``application statuses'' and the difference between a submission
receipt and a submission validation.
Applicants will receive a validation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. Again, validation of an
electronic submission via Grants.gov can take up to two business days.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov. ECA will not notify you upon receipt of electronic
applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
Optional--IV.3f.3 You may also state here any limitations on the
number of applications that an applicant may submit and make it clear
whether the limitation is on the submitting organization, individual
program director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process: The Bureau will review all proposals for
technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do
not fully adhere to the guidelines stated herein and in the
Solicitation Package. All eligible proposals will be reviewed by the
program office, as well as the Public Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be subject to compliance with
Federal and Bureau regulations and guidelines and forwarded to Bureau
grant panels for advisory review. Proposals may also be reviewed by the
Office of the Legal Adviser or by other Department elements. Final
funding decisions are at the discretion of the Department of State's
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative agreements resides with the
Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
[[Page 7731]]
1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Program planning/Ability to achieve program objectives: Detailed
agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive
undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to
the program overview and guidelines described above. Objectives should
be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
5. Institutional Capacity/Institution's Record/Ability: Proposed
personnel and institutional resources should be adequate and
appropriate to achieve the program or project's goals. Proposals should
demonstrate an institutional record of successful exchange programs,
including responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all
reporting requirements for past Bureau awards (grants or cooperative
agreements) as determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants.
6. Follow-on Activities: Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
7. Project Evaluation: Proposals should include a plan to evaluate
the activity's success, both as the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
project objectives is recommended.
8. Cost-effectiveness: The overhead and administrative components
of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as
low as possible. All other items should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector
support as well as institutional direct funding contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Federal
Assistance Award (FAA) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The FAA and the
original proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall
be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the
U.S. Government. The FAA will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.1b. The following additional requirements apply to this project:
For assistance awards involving Iran: A critical component of
current U.S. government Iran policy is the support for indigenous
Iranian voices. The State Department has made the awarding of grants
for this purpose a key component of its Iran policy. As a condition of
licensing these activities, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC)
has requested the Department of State to follow certain procedures to
effectuate the goals of Sections 481(b), 531(a), 571, 582, and 635(b)
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (as amended); 18 U.S.C. 2339A and
2339B; Executive Order 13224; and Homeland Security Presidential
Directive 6. These licensing conditions mandate that the Department
conduct a vetting of potential Iran grantees and sub-grantees for
counter-terrorism purposes. To conduct this vetting the Department will
collect information from grantees and sub-grantees regarding the
identity and background of their key employees and Boards of Directors.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of Iran complies
with requirements, please contact ECA/A/S/A Program Officer Bahareh
Moradi, 202-453-8885, e-mail: MoradiBX@state.gov for additional
information.
For assistance awards involving the Palestinian Authority, West
Bank, and Gaza: All awards made under this competition must be executed
according to all relevant U.S. laws and policies regarding assistance
to the Palestinian Authority, and to the West Bank and Gaza.
Organizations must consult with relevant Public Affairs Offices before
entering into any formal arrangements or agreements with Palestinian
organizations or institutions.
Note: To assure that planning for the inclusion of the
Palestinian Authority complies with requirements, please contact
ECA/A/S/A Program Officer Amy Forest, 202-453-8866, e-mail:
ForestAL@state.gov, for additional information.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments.''
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations.
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. https://
fa.statebuy.state.gov.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus two copies of the following reports:
(1) A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
(2) A concise, one-page final program report summarizing program
outcomes no more than 90 days after the expiration of the award. This
one-page report will be transmitted to OMB, and be made available to
the public via OMB's USAspending.gov Web site--as part of ECA's Federal
Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reporting
requirements.
(3) A SF-PPR, ``Performance Progress Report'' Cover Sheet with all
program reports.
(4) Semi-annual financial reports which should show the actual
amounts generated and that these funds are applied to support advising
services. All such income must be enumerated on Financial Status Report
``Long Form 269.'' Program reports should also show how using such
income reinforces the goals and objectives of this grant.
[[Page 7732]]
Award recipients will be required to provide reports analyzing
their evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program
reports. (Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions
(IV.3.d.3) above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Dorothy Mora,
Educational Information and Resources Branch, ECA/A/S/A, Room 349, ECA/
A/S/A-10-03, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, phone: 202-453-8868, fax: 202-453-8890, e-mail:
MoraDD@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/S/A-10-03. Please read the
complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals.
Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this
competition with applicants until the proposal review process has been
completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice: The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding
and may not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory
information provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language
will not be binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award
commitment on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right
to reduce, revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the
needs of the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be
subject to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section
VI.3 above.
Dated: February 10, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-3533 Filed 2-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P