Ochoco National Forest, Lookout Mountain Ranger District; Oregon; Canyon Fuels and Vegetation Management Project EIS, 7585-7587 [E9-3363]

Download as PDF mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 18, 2009 / Notices Responsible Official: The responsible official will be Jeff Walter, Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE Third Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need. The purpose of this proposal is to reauthorize livestock grazing consistent with Forest Plan standards and guidelines. There is a need to make range improvements and change livestock management to move towards desired conditions for stream shade and bank stability. Based on surveys many of the streams in the project area do not meet the desired condition for shade or bank stability. Livestock grazing is one of the factors that contribute to low levels of shade and unstable stream banks. Active riparian restoration activities will facilitate the achievement of the desired condition. Proposed Action. The proposed action includes a variety of management strategies and activities, including active management of livestock, creation of riparian pastures, resting of some areas while riparian resources improve, implementation of deferred rotation grazing systems, implementation of rest rotation grazing systems, new water developments, relocation or improvement of existing water developments, creation of livestock exclosures around riparian areas and/or sensitive plant locations, protection of heritage resources, planting of riparian hardwoods, placing logs and rocks in and along stream channels, protection of riparian vegetation and streambanks, and temporary and permanent reductions in AUMs. Issues. Preliminary issues identified include the potential effect of the proposed action on livestock grazing, on heritage resources, on the North Fork Crooked River Wild & Scenic corridor, on sensitive plants, and on the introduction and/or spread of invasive plants, as well as the cumulative effects of the proposed action where associated activities overlap with other management activities. Comment. Public comments about this proposal are requested in order to assist in identifying issues, determine how to best manage the resources, and to focus the analysis. Comments received to this notice, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposed action and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have standing to VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:45 Feb 17, 2009 Jkt 217001 appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR parts 215 and 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the requester of the agency’s decision regarding the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a specified number of days. A draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public review by July, 2009. The EPA will publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft ETS in the Federal Register. The final EIS is scheduled to be available September 2009. The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)]. Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EJS should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits of the alternatives formulated and PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7585 discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to substantive comments received during the comment period for the draft EIS. The Forest Service is the lead agency and the responsible official is the Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest. The responsible official will decide whether and how to reissue grazing permits in the Big Summit, Pringle, Brush Creek, Lost Horse and North Fork allotments. The responsible official will also decide how to mitigate impacts of these actions and will determine when and how monitoring of effects will take place. The Big Summit Allotment Management Plan decision and the reasons for the decision will be documented in the record of decision. That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations (35 CFR Part 215). Dated: February 9, 2009. William R. Queen, District Ranger. [FR Doc. E9–3275 Filed 2–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Ochoco National Forest, Lookout Mountain Ranger District; Oregon; Canyon Fuels and Vegetation Management Project EIS Forest Service, USDA. Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Ochoco National Forest is preparing an environmental impact statement (EIS) to analyze the effects of managing fuels and vegetation within the 31,500-acre Canyon project area, which is approximately 20 miles east of Prineville, Oregon. The project area includes National Forest System lands in the Upper Ochoco Creek Watershed. The alternatives that will be analyzed include the proposed action, no action, and additional alternatives that respond to issues generated through the scoping process. The Ochoco National Forest will give notice of the full environmental analysis and decision making process so interested and affected people may participate and contributes to the final decision. E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM 18FEN1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES 7586 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 18, 2009 / Notices DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received by March 20, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be completed and available for public comment in September 2009. The final environmental impact statement is expected to be completed in December 2009. ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Bill Queen, District Ranger, Lookout Mountain District, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE Third Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754. Alternately, electronic comments may be sent to commentspacificnorthwest-ochoco@fs.fed.us. Electronic comments must be submitted as part of the actual e-mail message, or as an attachment in plain text (.txt), Microsoft Word (.doc), rich text format (.rtf), or portable document format (.pdf). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Rawlings, Project Leader, or Marcy Boehme, Environmental Coordinator, at 3160 NE Third Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754, or at (541) 416–6500, or by email at rrawlings@fs.fed.us or nboehrne @J.fed.us. Responsible Official: The responsible official will be Jeff Walter, Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE., Third Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need. The Lookout Mountain Ranger District has determined that there is a need for fuels and vegetation management activities in the project area by comparing the existing condition to the desired conditions described in the Ochoco National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. The existing condition of the Upper Ochoco Creek Watershed was evaluated in 2004 and documented in the Upper Ochoco Creek Watershed Analysis. Generally speaking, the Watershed Analysis determined that vegetation conditions in the watershed have departed from the historic condition in several ways. Important departures include changes in timber species compositions, a reduction in singlestratum late and old structured forest, an increased risk of large-scale loss of forest to wildfire, an increased risk of insect infestation and/ or disease that can impact timber stands, and a decline in the condition of riparian vegetation. The purpose and need for this proposal is to (1) Maintain and increase the abundance of late and old structure (LOS) stands; (2) reduce fuels and the potential for high-intensity wildfires; (3) maintain conditions that currently support low-intensity fires; (4) reduce the susceptibility of the landscape to VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:45 Feb 17, 2009 Jkt 217001 large-scale infestation by insects and disease; (5) enhance hardwood communities, such as aspen and cottonwood; (6) increase riparian vegetation and large tree structure in Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas (RHCAs); and (7) increase earlyseral species composition. Proposed Action. The proposed action includes a variety of management strategies and activities, including commercial thinning with follow-up precommercial thinning and/or slash treatment (4,859 acres), precommerical thinning with slash treatment (5,494 acres), juniper cutting with slash treatment (1,397 acres), hardwood and riparian vegetation treatment (236 acres), and underbuming where no other treatments are proposed (1,989 acres). Implementation of the proposed action would require some connected actions; these include headcut repair and stream restoration at five locations, road construction (19.5 miles) and road reconstruction (13.2 miles). Issues. Preliminary issues identified include the potential effect of the proposed action on wildlife habitat, water quality, fish habitat, visual quality, and recreational use. In addition, the team will analyze the cumulative effects of this proposed action where it overlaps with the effects of other activities. Comment. Public comments about this proposal are requested in order to assist in identifying issues, determine how to best manage the resources, and to focus the analysis. Comments received to this notice, including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposed action and will be available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR parts 215 and 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest Service will inform the requester of the agency’s decision regarding the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the comments may be resubmitted with or without PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 name and address within a specified number of days. A draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public review by September, 2009. The EPA will publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft EIS in the Federal Register. The final EIS is scheduled to be available December, 2009. The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)]. Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to substantive comments received during the comment period for the draft EIS. The Forest Service is the lead agency and the responsible official is the Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest. The responsible official will decide whether and how to conduct fuels and vegetation management activities in the Canyon planning area. The responsible E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM 18FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 18, 2009 / Notices official will also decide how to mitigate impacts of these actions and will determine when and how monitoring of effects will take place. The Canyon Fuels and Vegetation Management Project decision and the reasons for the decision will be documented in the record of decision. That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations (35 CFR Part 215). of March 31, 2009. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. Dated: February 11, 2009. Amy Gowan, Designated Federal Official. [FR Doc. E9–3356 Filed 2–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Dated: February 11, 2009. William R. Queen, District Ranger. [FR Doc. E9–3363 Filed 2–17–09; 8:45 am] Forest Service BILLING CODE 3410–11–M AGENCY: Lake County Resource Advisory Committee ACTION: DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee Forest Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of meeting. AGENCY: mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES SUMMARY: The Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Klamath Falls, Oregon, for the purpose of evaluating and recommending resource management projects for funding in FY 2009, under the provisions of Title II of the Secure Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110– 343). DATES: The meeting will be held on March 30 and 31, 2009. ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place at the Klamath Ranger District Office, 2819 Dahlia Street, Klamath Falls, OR 97601. Send written comments to Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee, c/o USDA Forest Service, 2819 Dahlia Street, Klamath Falls, OR 97601 or electronically to agowan@fs.fed.us. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Gowan, Designated Federal Official, c/o Klamath Ranger District, 2819 Dahlia Street, Klamath Falls, OR 97601, telephone (541) 883–6741 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The agenda will include a review of the 2008 legislation, consideration of Title II project proposals for FY 2009 submitted by the Forest Service, the public, and other agencies, presentations by project proponents, and final recommendations for funding of fiscal year 2009 projects. All Fremont and Winema Resource Advisory Committee Meetings are open to the public. Public input and comment forum will take place in the afternoon VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:45 Feb 17, 2009 Jkt 217001 Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. SUMMARY: The Lake County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold a meeting. DATES: The meeting will be held on March 19, 2009, from 3 p.m. to 5 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Lake County Board of Supervisor’s Chambers at 255 North Forbes Street, Lakeport, Room C. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie McIntosh, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Upper Lake Ranger District, 10025 Elk Mountain Road, Upper Lake, CA 95485. (707) 275–2361: e-mail thncintosh@fs.fed.us. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Roll Call/Establish Quorum; (2) Welcome and Introductions; (3) Review of Members New Legislation Information (4) Discuss Project Cost Accounting USFS/County of Lake; (7) Set Next Meeting Date; (8) Public Comment Period; Public input opportunity will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time. (19) Adjourn. Dated: February 9, 2009. Lee D. Johnson, Designated Federal Officer. [FR Doc. E9–3326 Filed 2–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Forest Service Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee Forest Service, USDA. Notice of meeting. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be having the routine monthly meeting along with the public forum. The meeting is being held pursuant to the authorities in the PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7587 Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 110–343) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110– 343). The meeting is open to the public. DATES: The meeting will be held on February 24, 2009, 6:30 p.m. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Bitterroot National Forest, Supervisor Office, 1801 N First Street, Hamilton, Montana. Send written comments to Daniel G Ritter, District Ranger, Stevensville Ranger District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile (406) 777–7423, or electronically to dritter@fs.fed.us. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel G. Ritter, Stevensville District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777–5461. Dated: February 9, 2009. Julie K. King, Deputy Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. E9–3273 Filed 2–17–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Sunshine Act Notice AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights. ACTION: Notice of meeting. DATE AND TIME: Friday, February 20, 2009; 9:30 a.m. PLACE: 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425. Meeting Agenda I. Approval of Agenda. II. Approval of Minutes of December 12, 2008 and January 16, 2009 Meetings. III. Announcements. IV. Staff Director’s Report. V. Management and Operations. • FY 2010 Budget Request VI. Program Planning. • Findings and Recommendations for Briefing Report on Department of Justice’s Enforcement of Voting Rights in 2008 Presidential Election • Request To Extend the Public Comment Period for the Briefing on ‘‘Specifying English as the Common Language of the Workplace: Every Employer’s Right or Violation of Federal Law?’’ VII. State Advisory Committee Issues. • Oklahoma SAC VIII. Future Agenda Items. IX. Adjourn. CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION; Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376– 8582. TDD: (202) 376–8116. E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM 18FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7585-7587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Ochoco National Forest, Lookout Mountain Ranger District; Oregon; 
Canyon Fuels and Vegetation Management Project EIS

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Ochoco National Forest is preparing an environmental 
impact statement (EIS) to analyze the effects of managing fuels and 
vegetation within the 31,500-acre Canyon project area, which is 
approximately 20 miles east of Prineville, Oregon. The project area 
includes National Forest System lands in the Upper Ochoco Creek 
Watershed. The alternatives that will be analyzed include the proposed 
action, no action, and additional alternatives that respond to issues 
generated through the scoping process. The Ochoco National Forest will 
give notice of the full environmental analysis and decision making 
process so interested and affected people may participate and 
contributes to the final decision.

[[Page 7586]]


DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by March 20, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected 
to be completed and available for public comment in September 2009. The 
final environmental impact statement is expected to be completed in 
December 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Bill Queen, District Ranger, 
Lookout Mountain District, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 NE Third 
Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754. Alternately, electronic comments may 
be sent to comments-pacificnorthwest-ochoco@fs.fed.us. Electronic 
comments must be submitted as part of the actual e-mail message, or as 
an attachment in plain text (.txt), Microsoft Word (.doc), rich text 
format (.rtf), or portable document format (.pdf).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Rawlings, Project Leader, or Marcy 
Boehme, Environmental Coordinator, at 3160 NE Third Street, Prineville, 
Oregon 97754, or at (541) 416-6500, or by e-mail at rrawlings@fs.fed.us 
or nboehrne @J.fed.us. Responsible Official: The responsible official 
will be Jeff Walter, Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest, 3160 
NE., Third Street, Prineville, Oregon 97754.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose and Need. The Lookout Mountain Ranger District has 
determined that there is a need for fuels and vegetation management 
activities in the project area by comparing the existing condition to 
the desired conditions described in the Ochoco National Forest Land and 
Resource Management Plan. The existing condition of the Upper Ochoco 
Creek Watershed was evaluated in 2004 and documented in the Upper 
Ochoco Creek Watershed Analysis. Generally speaking, the Watershed 
Analysis determined that vegetation conditions in the watershed have 
departed from the historic condition in several ways. Important 
departures include changes in timber species compositions, a reduction 
in singlestratum late and old structured forest, an increased risk of 
large-scale loss of forest to wildfire, an increased risk of insect 
infestation and/or disease that can impact timber stands, and a decline 
in the condition of riparian vegetation.
    The purpose and need for this proposal is to (1) Maintain and 
increase the abundance of late and old structure (LOS) stands; (2) 
reduce fuels and the potential for high-intensity wildfires; (3) 
maintain conditions that currently support low-intensity fires; (4) 
reduce the susceptibility of the landscape to large-scale infestation 
by insects and disease; (5) enhance hardwood communities, such as aspen 
and cottonwood; (6) increase riparian vegetation and large tree 
structure in Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas (RHCAs); and (7) 
increase earlyseral species composition.
    Proposed Action. The proposed action includes a variety of 
management strategies and activities, including commercial thinning 
with follow-up precommercial thinning and/or slash treatment (4,859 
acres), precommerical thinning with slash treatment (5,494 acres), 
juniper cutting with slash treatment (1,397 acres), hardwood and 
riparian vegetation treatment (236 acres), and underbuming where no 
other treatments are proposed (1,989 acres). Implementation of the 
proposed action would require some connected actions; these include 
headcut repair and stream restoration at five locations, road 
construction (19.5 miles) and road reconstruction (13.2 miles).
    Issues. Preliminary issues identified include the potential effect 
of the proposed action on wildlife habitat, water quality, fish 
habitat, visual quality, and recreational use. In addition, the team 
will analyze the cumulative effects of this proposed action where it 
overlaps with the effects of other activities.
    Comment. Public comments about this proposal are requested in order 
to assist in identifying issues, determine how to best manage the 
resources, and to focus the analysis. Comments received to this notice, 
including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered 
part of the public record on this proposed action and will be available 
for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be accepted 
and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments will not 
have standing to appeal the subsequent decision under 36 CFR parts 215 
and 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person may 
request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record by 
showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such 
confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be 
aware that, under FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very 
limited circumstances, such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest 
Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding 
the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied, the 
agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the 
comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a 
specified number of days.
    A draft EIS will be filed with the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) and available for public review by September, 2009. The EPA will 
publish a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft EIS in the Federal 
Register. The final EIS is scheduled to be available December, 2009.
    The comment period on the draft EIS will be 45 days from the date 
the EPA publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
    The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
a draft EIS must structure their participation in the environmental 
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to 
the reviewer's position and contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power 
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978)]. Also, environmental 
objections that could be raised at the draft EIS stage but that are not 
raised until after completion of the final EIS may be waived or 
dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 
1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court rulings, it is very 
important that those interested in this proposed action participate by 
the close of the 45-day comment period so that substantive comments and 
objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it 
can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final EIS.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft EIS should 
be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to 
specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also 
address the adequacy of the draft EIS of the merits of the alternatives 
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
    In the final EIS, the Forest Service is required to respond to 
substantive comments received during the comment period for the draft 
EIS. The Forest Service is the lead agency and the responsible official 
is the Forest Supervisor, Ochoco National Forest. The responsible 
official will decide whether and how to conduct fuels and vegetation 
management activities in the Canyon planning area. The responsible

[[Page 7587]]

official will also decide how to mitigate impacts of these actions and 
will determine when and how monitoring of effects will take place.
    The Canyon Fuels and Vegetation Management Project decision and the 
reasons for the decision will be documented in the record of decision. 
That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations (35 
CFR Part 215).

    Dated: February 11, 2009.
William R. Queen,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-3363 Filed 2-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.