Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Tapentadol Into Schedule II, 7386-7388 [E9-3150]
Download as PDF
7386
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–319P]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of Tapentadol Into Schedule
II
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule is issued
by the Deputy Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to
place the substance tapentadol,
including its isomers, esters, ethers,
salts and salts of isomers, esters, and
ethers whenever the existence of such
isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is
possible, into schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This
proposed action is based on a
recommendation from the Assistant
Secretary for Health of the Department
of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
and on an evaluation of the relevant
data by DEA. If finalized, this action
would impose the regulatory controls
and criminal sanctions of schedule II on
those who handle tapentadol and
products containing tapentadol.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked on or before March 19,
2009, and electronic comments must be
sent on or before midnight Eastern time
March 19, 2009.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–319’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments sent via regular or express
mail should be sent to the Drug
Enforcement Administration, Attention:
DEA Federal Register Representative/
ODL, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152. Comments
may be sent to DEA by sending an
electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov.
Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site.
DEA will accept electronic comments
containing MS Word, WordPerfect,
Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only.
DEA will not accept any file format
other than those specifically listed here.
Please note that DEA is requesting
that electronic comments be submitted
before midnight Eastern time on the day
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Feb 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
the comment period closes because
https://www.regulations.gov terminates
the public’s ability to submit comments
at midnight Eastern time on the day the
comment period closes. Commenters in
time zones other than Eastern time may
want to consider this so that their
electronic comments are received. All
comments sent via regular or express
mail will be considered timely if
postmarked on the day the comment
period closes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section,
Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152, Telephone: (202) 307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments: Please
note that all comments received are
considered part of the public record and
made available for public inspection
online at https://www.regulations.gov
and in the Drug Enforcement
Administration’s public docket. Such
information includes personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also place
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online or made
available in the public docket in the first
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted online or made
available in the public docket.
Personal identifying information and
confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will be redacted and the comment, in
redacted form, will be posted online and
placed in the DEA’s public docket file.
Please note that the Freedom of
Information Act applies to all comments
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
received. If you wish to inspect the
agency’s public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph.
Background
On November 20, 2008, the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approved
tapentadol for marketing in the United
States as a prescription drug product for
the treatment of moderate-to-severe
acute pain. Tapentadol is a new
molecular entity with centrally-acting
analgesic properties.
Tapentadol has dual modes of action
namely, mu (μ) opioid receptor agonistic
action and inhibition of reuptake of
norepinephrine at the norepinephrine
transporter. The chemical name of its
monohydrochloride salt form is 3[(1R,2R)-3-(dimethylamino)-1-ethyl-2methylpropyl]phenol hydrochloride.
Tapentadol shares substantial
pharmacological effects and abuse
potential with other schedule II opioid
analgesics, e.g., morphine, oxycodone,
and hydromorphone. Tapentadol has
rewarding and reinforcing effects
similar to those of morphine in animal
models. It generalizes to the
discriminative stimulus effects of
morphine in rats and monkeys.
Tapentadol, similar to morphine,
produced conditioned place preference
in rats, and this effect was antagonized
by naloxone (anopioid receptor
antagonist). In a clinical study with
opioid-experienced non-dependent
subjects, the subjective scores for drug
liking of a single dose of tapentadol (50,
100 and 200 mg) were comparable to
equianalgesic doses of hydromorphone
(4, 8, and 16 mg). In clinical studies,
tapentadol showed an adverse event
profile similar to other schedule II
opioids. The most commonly reported
adverse events are nausea, dizziness,
vomiting, somnolence, vertigo, and
headache. In a clinical study in which
the patients received equianalgesic
doses of tapentadol or oxycodone for 90
days, the reports of withdrawal
symptoms were comparable for both
treatment groups upon discontinuance
of administration. The ability of
tapentadol to produce psychological
dependence is suggested by a level of
drug liking comparable to that produced
by hydromorphone.
Since tapentadol is a new molecular
entity, there has been no evidence of
diversion, abuse, or law enforcement
encounters involving the drug. On
November 13, 2008, the Assistant
Secretary for Health, DHHS, sent the
Deputy Administrator of DEA a
scientific and medical evaluation and a
letter recommending that tapentadol be
E:\FR\FM\17FEP1.SGM
17FEP1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
placed into schedule II of the CSA.
Enclosed with the November 13, 2008,
letter was a document prepared by the
FDA entitled, ‘‘Basis for the
Recommendation for Control of
Tapentadol in Schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act.’’ The
document contained a review of the
factors which the CSA requires the
Secretary to consider (21 U.S.C. 811(b)).
The factors considered by the
Assistant Secretary of Health and the
DEA with respect to tapentadol were:
(1) Its actual or relative potential for
abuse;
(2) Scientific evidence of its
pharmacological effects;
(3) The state of current scientific
knowledge regarding the drug;
(4) Its history and current pattern of
abuse;
(5) The scope, duration, and
significance of abuse;
(6) What, if any, risk there is to the
public health;
(7) Its psychic or physiological
dependence liability; and
(8) Whether the substance is an
immediate precursor of a substance
already controlled under this
subchapter. (21 U.S.C. 811(c))
Based on the recommendation of the
Assistant Secretary for Health, received
in accordance with § 201(b) of the Act
(21 U.S.C. 811(b)), and the independent
review of the available data by DEA, the
Deputy Administrator of DEA, pursuant
to §§ 201(a) and 201(b) of the Act (21
U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b)), finds that:
(1) Tapentadol has a high potential for
abuse;
(2) Tapentadol currently has accepted
medical use in treatment in the United
States; and
(3) Abuse of tapentadol may lead to
severe psychological or physical
dependence.
Based on these findings, the Deputy
Administrator of DEA concludes that
tapentadol, including its isomers, esters,
ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters,
and ethers whenever the existence of
such isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is
possible, warrants control in schedule II
of the CSA. (21 U.S.C. 812 (b)(2))
Interested persons are invited to
submit their comments, objections or
requests for a hearing with regard to this
proposal. Requests for a hearing should
state, with particularity, the issues
concerning which the person desires to
be heard. All correspondence regarding
this matter should be submitted to the
DEA to the address provided above. In
the event that comments, objections, or
requests for a hearing raise one or more
issues which the Deputy Administrator
finds warrant a hearing, the Deputy
Administrator shall order a public
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Feb 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
hearing by notice in the Federal
Register, summarizing the issues to be
heard and setting the time for the
hearing.
Requirements for Handling Tapentadol
If this rule is finalized as proposed,
tapentadol would be subject to the CSA
regulatory controls and administrative,
civil and criminal sanctions applicable
to the manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, importing, and exporting of
a schedule II controlled substance,
including the following:
Registration. Any person who
manufactures, distributes, dispenses,
imports, exports, engages in research or
conducts instructional activities with
tapentadol, or who desires to
manufacture, distribute, dispense,
import, export, engage in instructional
activities or conduct research with
tapentadol, would be required to be
registered to conduct such activities in
accordance with Part 1301 of Title 21 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Security. Tapentadol would be subject
to schedule II security requirements and
must be manufactured, distributed and
stored in accordance with §§ 1301.71,
1301.72(a), (c), and (d), 1301.73,
1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c), 1301.76 and
1301.77 of Title 21 of the CFR.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels
and labeling for commercial containers
of tapentadol which are distributed after
finalization of this rule would be
required to comply with requirements of
§§ 1302.03–1302.07 of Title 21 of the
CFR.
Quotas. Quotas for tapentadol would
be established pursuant to part 1303 of
Title 21 of the CFR.
Inventory. Every registrant required to
keep records and who possesses any
quantity of tapentadol would be
required to keep an inventory of all
stocks of tapentadol on hand pursuant
to §§ 1304.03, 1304.04 and 1304.11 of
Title 21 of the CFR. Every registrant
who desires registration in schedule II
for tapentadol would be required to
conduct an inventory of all stocks of the
substance on hand at the time of
registration.
Records. All registrants would be
required to keep records pursuant to
§§ 1304.03, 1304.04, 1304.21, 1304.22,
and 1304.23 of Title 21 of the CFR.
Reports. All registrants required to
submit reports to the Automation of
Reports and Consolidated Order System
(ARCOS) in accordance with § 1304.33
of Title 21 of the CFR would be required
to do so for tapentadol.
Orders for tapentadol. All registrants
involved in the distribution of
tapentadol would be required to comply
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7387
with the order form requirements of part
1305 of Title 21 of the CFR.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for
tapentadol or prescriptions for products
containing tapentadol would be
required to be issued pursuant to 21
CFR § 1306.03–1306.06 and 1306.11–
1306.15.
Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of
tapentadol would need to be in
compliance with part 1312 of Title 21 of
the CFR.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with
tapentadol not authorized by, or in
violation of, the CSA or the Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act
occurring on or after finalization of this
proposed rule would be unlawful.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), this action
is a formal rulemaking ‘‘on the record
after opportunity for a hearing.’’ Such
proceedings are conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557
and, as such, are exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to Executive Order 12866,
section 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), has
reviewed this proposed rule and by
approving it certifies that it will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Tapentadol products will be
prescription drugs used for the
treatment of moderate-to-severe acute
pain. Handlers of tapentadol will also
handle other controlled substances used
to treat pain which are already subject
to the regulatory requirements of the
CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of state law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any state; nor does it
diminish the power of any state to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
E:\FR\FM\17FEP1.SGM
17FEP1
7388
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 17, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $120,000,000 or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year,
and will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Federal Transit Administration
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Congressional Review Act). This
rule will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices:
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b)
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1308.12 is amended in the
table by adding a new paragraph (c)(28)
to read as follows:
Schedule II.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(28) Tapentadol 9780
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 27, 2009.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–3150 Filed 2–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:52 Feb 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
[Docket No. FTA–2006–25737]
RIN 2132–AA81
Major Capital Investment Projects
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
withdrawal.
SUMMARY: This action withdraws a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
concerning major capital investment
projects published in the Federal
Register on August 3, 2007 (72 FR
43328). FTA has determined that
withdrawal of the NPRM is warranted
due to an intervening statutory change.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Van Wyk, Office of Chief
Counsel, Federal Transit
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., East Building, Fifth Floor,
Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–4011
or Christopher.VanWyk@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the authority vested in the
Attorney General by § 201(a) of the CSA
(21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and delegated to the
Administrator of the DEA by the
Department of Justice regulations (28
CFR 0.100), and redelegated to the
Deputy Administrator pursuant to 28
CFR 0.104, the Deputy Administrator
hereby proposes that 21 CFR part 1308
be amended as follows:
§ 1308.12
49 CFR Part 611
On August 10, 2005, President Bush
signed the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
and Efficient Transportation Equity
Act—A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–
LU). Section 3011 of SAFETEA–LU
made a number of changes to 49 U.S.C.
5309, which authorizes the Federal
Transit Administration’s (FTA) capital
investment grant program. SAFETEA–
LU also required that FTA issue
regulations establishing an evaluation
and rating process for the new Small
Starts program. To effectuate the
statutory changes and comply with the
rulemaking requirement, FTA published
an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking on January 30, 2006 and a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
on August 3, 2007. On June 6, 2008, the
SAFETEA–LU Technical Corrections
Act of 2008 (122 Stat. 1572) was signed
into law, amending 49 U.S.C. 5309 to
require that FTA ‘‘give comparable, but
not necessarily equal, numerical weight
to each project justification criteria in
calculating the overall project rating’’
for both New Start and Small Start
projects. The revisions to the statute
require such a fundamental change in
how FTA weighs the several project
justification criteria that a new approach
to rulemaking for the New Starts and
Small Starts program is required. Thus,
FTA is publishing this notice to
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
withdraw the NPRM it issued on August
3, 2007.
FTA received numerous written
comments in response to the NPRM.
The majority of commenters opposed
the NPRM, with overwhelmingly
negative comment on a number of
specific proposals. The following
concerns emerged as the most widely
held: A regulatory requirement that a
project be rated medium on costeffectiveness in order to obtain a
funding recommendation; costeffectiveness weighted fifty percent of
the overall project justification rating;
modification of the definition of ‘‘fixed
guideway’’ to include High Occupancy
Toll (HOT) lanes under certain
conditions; consideration given to
congestion reduction in evaluating
projects; inclusion of weights for
evaluation criteria in the regulatory text
rather than in policy guidance; the level
of simplification for the new Small
Starts program; the combination of the
evaluation measures for economic
development and land use and the
weight given to the combined measure;
the prohibition on segmenting a New
Starts project into several Small Starts
projects; and the proposal for the Very
Small Starts category of projects.
Today’s issue of the Federal Register
contains another withdrawal notice by
which FTA is also withdrawing the
NPRM it issued for the Contractor
Performance Incentives for the Capital
Investment Program on February 19,
2008 (73 FR 9075).
The Withdrawal
In consideration of the foregoing, the
NPRM for FTA Docket No. FTA–2006–
25737, as published in the Federal
Register on August 3, 2007 (72 FR
43328) is hereby withdrawn.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 10th day of
February, 2009.
Matthew J. Welbes,
Acting Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–3208 Filed 2–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 612
[Docket No. FTA–2008–0005]
RIN 2132–AA96
Contractor Performance Incentives for
the Capital Investment Program
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), DOT.
E:\FR\FM\17FEP1.SGM
17FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 17, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7386-7388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-3150]
[[Page 7386]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-319P]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Tapentadol Into
Schedule II
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule is issued by the Deputy Administrator of
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to place the substance
tapentadol, including its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of
isomers, esters, and ethers whenever the existence of such isomers,
esters, ethers, and salts is possible, into schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). This proposed action is based on a
recommendation from the Assistant Secretary for Health of the
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and on an evaluation of
the relevant data by DEA. If finalized, this action would impose the
regulatory controls and criminal sanctions of schedule II on those who
handle tapentadol and products containing tapentadol.
DATES: Written comments must be postmarked on or before March 19, 2009,
and electronic comments must be sent on or before midnight Eastern time
March 19, 2009.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference
``Docket No. DEA-319'' on all written and electronic correspondence.
Written comments sent via regular or express mail should be sent to the
Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register
Representative/ODL, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152. Comments may be sent to DEA by sending an electronic message to
dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov. Comments may also be sent
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov using the electronic
comment form provided on that site. An electronic copy of this document
is also available at the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. DEA will
accept electronic comments containing MS Word, WordPerfect, Adobe PDF,
or Excel file formats only. DEA will not accept any file format other
than those specifically listed here.
Please note that DEA is requesting that electronic comments be
submitted before midnight Eastern time on the day the comment period
closes because https://www.regulations.gov terminates the public's
ability to submit comments at midnight Eastern time on the day the
comment period closes. Commenters in time zones other than Eastern time
may want to consider this so that their electronic comments are
received. All comments sent via regular or express mail will be
considered timely if postmarked on the day the comment period closes.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Drug Enforcement Administration,
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152, Telephone: (202)
307-7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments: Please note that all comments received
are considered part of the public record and made available for public
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov and in the Drug
Enforcement Administration's public docket. Such information includes
personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it
to be posted online or made available in the public docket, you must
include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION'' in the first
paragraph of your comment. You must also place all the personal
identifying information you do not want posted online or made available
in the public docket in the first paragraph of your comment and
identify what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment, but do not want it to be posted online or made available
in the public docket, you must include the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL
BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must
also prominently identify confidential business information to be
redacted within the comment. If a comment has so much confidential
business information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or
part of that comment may not be posted online or made available in the
public docket.
Personal identifying information and confidential business
information identified and located as set forth above will be redacted
and the comment, in redacted form, will be posted online and placed in
the DEA's public docket file.
Please note that the Freedom of Information Act applies to all
comments received. If you wish to inspect the agency's public docket
file in person by appointment, please see the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph.
Background
On November 20, 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved tapentadol for marketing in the United States as a
prescription drug product for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acute
pain. Tapentadol is a new molecular entity with centrally-acting
analgesic properties.
Tapentadol has dual modes of action namely, mu ([mu]) opioid
receptor agonistic action and inhibition of reuptake of norepinephrine
at the norepinephrine transporter. The chemical name of its
monohydrochloride salt form is 3-[(1R,2R)-3-(dimethylamino)-1-ethyl-2-
methylpropyl]phenol hydrochloride.
Tapentadol shares substantial pharmacological effects and abuse
potential with other schedule II opioid analgesics, e.g., morphine,
oxycodone, and hydromorphone. Tapentadol has rewarding and reinforcing
effects similar to those of morphine in animal models. It generalizes
to the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats and monkeys.
Tapentadol, similar to morphine, produced conditioned place preference
in rats, and this effect was antagonized by naloxone (anopioid receptor
antagonist). In a clinical study with opioid-experienced non-dependent
subjects, the subjective scores for drug liking of a single dose of
tapentadol (50, 100 and 200 mg) were comparable to equianalgesic doses
of hydromorphone (4, 8, and 16 mg). In clinical studies, tapentadol
showed an adverse event profile similar to other schedule II opioids.
The most commonly reported adverse events are nausea, dizziness,
vomiting, somnolence, vertigo, and headache. In a clinical study in
which the patients received equianalgesic doses of tapentadol or
oxycodone for 90 days, the reports of withdrawal symptoms were
comparable for both treatment groups upon discontinuance of
administration. The ability of tapentadol to produce psychological
dependence is suggested by a level of drug liking comparable to that
produced by hydromorphone.
Since tapentadol is a new molecular entity, there has been no
evidence of diversion, abuse, or law enforcement encounters involving
the drug. On November 13, 2008, the Assistant Secretary for Health,
DHHS, sent the Deputy Administrator of DEA a scientific and medical
evaluation and a letter recommending that tapentadol be
[[Page 7387]]
placed into schedule II of the CSA. Enclosed with the November 13,
2008, letter was a document prepared by the FDA entitled, ``Basis for
the Recommendation for Control of Tapentadol in Schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act.'' The document contained a review of the
factors which the CSA requires the Secretary to consider (21 U.S.C.
811(b)).
The factors considered by the Assistant Secretary of Health and the
DEA with respect to tapentadol were:
(1) Its actual or relative potential for abuse;
(2) Scientific evidence of its pharmacological effects;
(3) The state of current scientific knowledge regarding the drug;
(4) Its history and current pattern of abuse;
(5) The scope, duration, and significance of abuse;
(6) What, if any, risk there is to the public health;
(7) Its psychic or physiological dependence liability; and
(8) Whether the substance is an immediate precursor of a substance
already controlled under this subchapter. (21 U.S.C. 811(c))
Based on the recommendation of the Assistant Secretary for Health,
received in accordance with Sec. 201(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(b)),
and the independent review of the available data by DEA, the Deputy
Administrator of DEA, pursuant to Sec. Sec. 201(a) and 201(b) of the
Act (21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b)), finds that:
(1) Tapentadol has a high potential for abuse;
(2) Tapentadol currently has accepted medical use in treatment in
the United States; and
(3) Abuse of tapentadol may lead to severe psychological or
physical dependence.
Based on these findings, the Deputy Administrator of DEA concludes
that tapentadol, including its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts
of isomers, esters, and ethers whenever the existence of such isomers,
esters, ethers, and salts is possible, warrants control in schedule II
of the CSA. (21 U.S.C. 812 (b)(2))
Interested persons are invited to submit their comments, objections
or requests for a hearing with regard to this proposal. Requests for a
hearing should state, with particularity, the issues concerning which
the person desires to be heard. All correspondence regarding this
matter should be submitted to the DEA to the address provided above. In
the event that comments, objections, or requests for a hearing raise
one or more issues which the Deputy Administrator finds warrant a
hearing, the Deputy Administrator shall order a public hearing by
notice in the Federal Register, summarizing the issues to be heard and
setting the time for the hearing.
Requirements for Handling Tapentadol
If this rule is finalized as proposed, tapentadol would be subject
to the CSA regulatory controls and administrative, civil and criminal
sanctions applicable to the manufacture, distribution, dispensing,
importing, and exporting of a schedule II controlled substance,
including the following:
Registration. Any person who manufactures, distributes, dispenses,
imports, exports, engages in research or conducts instructional
activities with tapentadol, or who desires to manufacture, distribute,
dispense, import, export, engage in instructional activities or conduct
research with tapentadol, would be required to be registered to conduct
such activities in accordance with Part 1301 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR).
Security. Tapentadol would be subject to schedule II security
requirements and must be manufactured, distributed and stored in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 1301.71, 1301.72(a), (c), and (d), 1301.73,
1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c), 1301.76 and 1301.77 of Title 21 of the
CFR.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels and labeling for commercial
containers of tapentadol which are distributed after finalization of
this rule would be required to comply with requirements of Sec. Sec.
1302.03-1302.07 of Title 21 of the CFR.
Quotas. Quotas for tapentadol would be established pursuant to part
1303 of Title 21 of the CFR.
Inventory. Every registrant required to keep records and who
possesses any quantity of tapentadol would be required to keep an
inventory of all stocks of tapentadol on hand pursuant to Sec. Sec.
1304.03, 1304.04 and 1304.11 of Title 21 of the CFR. Every registrant
who desires registration in schedule II for tapentadol would be
required to conduct an inventory of all stocks of the substance on hand
at the time of registration.
Records. All registrants would be required to keep records pursuant
to Sec. Sec. 1304.03, 1304.04, 1304.21, 1304.22, and 1304.23 of Title
21 of the CFR.
Reports. All registrants required to submit reports to the
Automation of Reports and Consolidated Order System (ARCOS) in
accordance with Sec. 1304.33 of Title 21 of the CFR would be required
to do so for tapentadol.
Orders for tapentadol. All registrants involved in the distribution
of tapentadol would be required to comply with the order form
requirements of part 1305 of Title 21 of the CFR.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for tapentadol or prescriptions
for products containing tapentadol would be required to be issued
pursuant to 21 CFR Sec. 1306.03-1306.06 and 1306.11-1306.15.
Importation and Exportation. All importation and exportation of
tapentadol would need to be in compliance with part 1312 of Title 21 of
the CFR.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with tapentadol not authorized by,
or in violation of, the CSA or the Controlled Substances Import and
Export Act occurring on or after finalization of this proposed rule
would be unlawful.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)),
this action is a formal rulemaking ``on the record after opportunity
for a hearing.'' Such proceedings are conducted pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and, as such, are exempt from review
by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Executive Order
12866, section 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), has reviewed this proposed rule and
by approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Tapentadol products
will be prescription drugs used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe
acute pain. Handlers of tapentadol will also handle other controlled
substances used to treat pain which are already subject to the
regulatory requirements of the CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
Sec. Sec. 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of state
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any state; nor
does it diminish the power of any state to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
[[Page 7388]]
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$120,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and will
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by Sec. 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional
Review Act). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices:
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
Under the authority vested in the Attorney General by Sec. 201(a)
of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and delegated to the Administrator of
the DEA by the Department of Justice regulations (28 CFR 0.100), and
redelegated to the Deputy Administrator pursuant to 28 CFR 0.104, the
Deputy Administrator hereby proposes that 21 CFR part 1308 be amended
as follows:
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1308 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b) unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1308.12 is amended in the table by adding a new
paragraph (c)(28) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.12 Schedule II.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(28) Tapentadol 9780
* * * * *
Dated: January 27, 2009.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-3150 Filed 2-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P